Brilliant. You can see the Bofors design characteristics back to the WW2 era 40mm Bofors.

@coolyeah2410

9 ай бұрын

Basically the majority of gun uses the same principle since ww2 and onward, there not much new invention since then, many are upgrade and inovation of the existing gun. Like how the bofor in the vidio is the mark 110 from a gun that was developed back in the 1970s. Well I am gonna be that guy and say sorry now

@SonsOfLorgar

9 ай бұрын

​@@coolyeah2410 the Bofors 40mm which the 57mm is derived from first entered service as a towed medium AA gun in 1938.

@petergrandien1440

9 ай бұрын

@@coolyeah2410 So if the gun and loading mechanism is from ww2 and basically simple mechanics, how come US Navy BUYS them from Swedish Bofors? Albeit there might be a production license and they are produced in US... but still the Licens costs on that.

@coolyeah2410

9 ай бұрын

@@petergrandien1440 Well the bofor guy make it since WWII, so ofc they hold the right to their mechanism

@dronefootage2778

8 ай бұрын

since everything in britain is brilliant, what is the next step up from that? we have brilliant too but it comes later on, we only use it if something is truly brilliant

What a gun the Bofors has turned out to be. First produced for the Swedes in 1930 it has stood the test of time and war to prove itself a superbly brilliant weapon. And its story isn't finished yet!!

@keithdurose7057

9 ай бұрын

Absolutely correct! During the Falklands war/conflict. The RFA LSL Knights of the Round Table. Had two 40mm Bofors In two weapon pits at the bow. 11 Ciels Squadron Royal Engineers. Built stands for twin light machine guns. Recalibered BREN's also of WW2 vintage. For anti aircraft defence. Situated at the galley entrances and on the flight deck.On board the LSL Sir Bedivere. 1 Raiding Squadron Royal Marine Commandos also on board positioned their GPMG's on the gunnels. Amidships. This proved effective. A 1000lb "return to sender" bomb. Hit the ariels, crane and bow before going into the water without exploding. The ship was also credited with shooting down an Argentine Mirage. Most likely the Bofor's did the damage.

@purrynstrumental3719

24 күн бұрын

Es el AK de la artillería

Every home in America needs one.

@reluctantheist5224

Ай бұрын

* has one.😂

this is really a clever innovation over the classic bofors magazine fed system from wwii, you keep the mature system, and replace the part of using manpower to fed the magazine with machine, i like this kind of combining the old and new.

Should have included the spent shell casing ejection in the animation.

Alright, now, how do those four stacks get distributed to the one breech? That's what I want to see next.

@nunyadambusiness6902

10 ай бұрын

It shows you - automatic feed - also reloads while firing...

@alloy299

10 ай бұрын

Given that the magazines have parallel stacks I would assume each stack squeezes, sequentially, into a single feed and the gun itself has a double feed breach. Would be interesting to have confirmation of it.

@markbecht1420

9 ай бұрын

@@alloy299 Four into two into on, with selectable gates at each 'branch' The original concept was to have multiple types of ammunition available depending on the target. Current usage is programmable multi-function projectiles that are 'told' what to do as they are fired, so ammo choice is less of a critical need. Except 'dumb' solids for practice/

@5678sothourn

9 ай бұрын

Star wheel. Look up the 90mm automatic AA gun

@peterhuffam1006

9 ай бұрын

@@5678sothourn Hi, could you post a link to the specific gun system to which you refer, please? There are several designs out there, and I am not familiar with this “star wheel” feed mechanism.

すっげー！リロードするんだ！ って驚いたらマガジンロードまでするの？！ 実質装弾数無限やんか・・・

Brillaint. Light weight. This gun shoots more explosive per min than the 76mm super rapid

I don't suppose you have to reload Bofors like this very often, there can't be many problems you can't solve with 40 rounds of 57mm.

@jerryalbus1492

9 ай бұрын

It can one-shot an aircraft, can one-shot or 3-shot a modern vessel, and hit almost 98% of the time depending on the electronics of the platform so...

@user-yq8qf9yx8t

9 ай бұрын

現代なら大量のミサイル飽和攻撃対策が必須だからなあ

@alamos8

7 ай бұрын

40 of very inmediate use, 120 inside the turret... 240 total on a corvette like that, maybe more? 300, 360?

Great video as always. I wish I could have one for home defence and hunting purposes.

@senatuspopulusqueromanus2082

9 ай бұрын

Do you like your prey turned into red mist?

@mr.normalguy69

9 ай бұрын

@@senatuspopulusqueromanus2082 Yes

@IRMentat

9 ай бұрын

it's so much easier when you can eat them through a straw.

@gaveintothedarkness

9 ай бұрын

Me too. I recently started using one of these as my CCW and absolutely love it!

@williamgibb5557

9 ай бұрын

Really useful as an anti-government official deterrent!

As someone who served in the Navy, I got to see that cannon in action during scheduled drills that were conducted to ensure it was seaworthy, as well as simply operating at peak condition. Whenever you were walking anywhere in the ship, and that thing went off, you could feel the vibrations throughout the ship go up your feet. And we all wear heavy steel toed, black leather boots!!

@dmoney8602

3 ай бұрын

No one cares

@henrycooper3431

3 ай бұрын

​@@dmoney8602you typed so you do care you know?

If you look at WW2 Bofors they alternated between 2 stack the sailors loaded, I expect with the ability to select which stack they "stripped" a round from that could likely be the simple change in rotation of the feeder would pick HE from the right, or AA frag from the left. Given the magazines can move too, the ready rounds could be a mix of 10 each of 4 different rounds. so you could have cheap solids and AP in in the mix. a 10 round burst off solids across the bow could probably reloaded with HE/AP depending on the target just threatened. Slick system, and that is what is in the turret, 80 ready rounds full of pain to go down range. Now the modern turret shape makes more sense.

@Mr.Robert1

9 ай бұрын

What you're saying is true. Problem is the mentality of the average person has gone substantially downhill. Apparently the more technology that gets put into the Public's hands they become dumb down. Unless they join the armed forces and have someone knock some sense into them. Lt Rob, United States Airforce Retired.

Ack ack gun My Grandad was on them in WW2 . After Dunkirk he was injured so was stationed on the AA guns ..He called them Ack Ack guns . So many stories but he always said it was one of the best jobs he ever had in the War .

Awesome! Thanks for these great animations!!

中身、こうなってるんだねぇ（感嘆）

今までの艦砲と違って砲の下に弾倉部分を用意しなくてよいのは色んな船に使えて良いね。オートメラーラのやつは下の弾倉デカかったからなぁ

@user-ek5xr1ry9j

7 ай бұрын

ここまでの構造を見ると芸術作品に見えてきますね。

Great video! Thanks. It seems as if the Bofors was the only thing that remotely worked….at all!

Great video! My dad was on a 40 mm Bofors on Remagen Bridge during WW2.

Excellent piece of mechanical engineering.

こいつの仕組み前からずっっと気になってたから知れてマジで嬉しいw

Perfect explination. Thank you for uploading.

After you cycle 120 rounds through that gun I don't recommend toughing the barrel for a while.

@SonsOfLorgar

9 ай бұрын

Exactly, not even if it's a water cooled version.

@benjaminshtark5977

9 ай бұрын

i think water cooling can be easily added, but yeah, after shooting for a while barrel will get deformations and will need replacement.

Nice! Cleared that up for me.

really thx. always wondered about all cannon's feeding system

Thanks! Awesome video!

yep , that looks like it would work flawlessly all the time.

Good animation ! 👍 Now let’s see an animation of how they did it the old fashion way in WWII in the heat of battle with manpower !

Great yet simple explaination video. I like it. Well done

Incredibly smart, 120 rounds on the turret before relosding (and able to reload while firing if needed)

イメージとしては「弾倉」「即応弾薬クリップ」「弾薬クリップ用予備弾」 が上にあってそれ以上必要なら下から上がってくる感じか。

Мощно, надёжно, эффективно. Только целей для таких пушек мало.

Brilliant. I love it.

Interesting design. Never would of thought of that.

thats brillaint

So frikin awesome!!

as a naval main in War Thunder, this was quite interesting.

That was so cool.

Awesome awesome awesome!!!!

砲塔内のストックが無くなったら終わりか・・・と思ったら足せるとは。凄い仕組み。

Genius!

Bofors 40 mm was/is the best light anti-aircraft gun of all time. I know them, I was the shooter on them a long time ago.

@dundonrl

7 ай бұрын

There's a reason why the military doesn't use guns for AA/AAA any more, incoming missiles and aircraft are much too fast to consistently hit them.

@SimpleTon294

4 ай бұрын

@@dundonrl they do, they are used but most navies in the world. Of course they are used alongside a variety of weapon systems like Missiles and CIWS. But they are used and they are used against incoming anti ship missiles. No system can consistently (guarantee to) hit an incoming missile, that's why we they use a layered defence.

@dundonrl

4 ай бұрын

@@SimpleTon294 Which modern Navy warships use fully automatic guns (like the 40mm Bofors) for ASCMs? I can't find a single one that isn't a CIWS. I know the US Navy doesn't use them, the non CIWS guns are used against small boat attacks, not for incoming missiles.

@SimpleTon294

4 ай бұрын

@@dundonrl the 40mm and 57mm are multi purpose gun systems. "Bofors claims that with 120 ready rounds the system can sufficiently engage 1 to 2 surface targets and 4 sea skimming missiles." It's used by the US navy and many navies around the world to engage missiles. A missile going below the speed of sound is not a extreme challenge for the borfors with 3P ammuition. That being said, faster missiles require multible systems to disengage it or destroy it (hard kill and soft kill)

@dundonrl

4 ай бұрын

@@SimpleTon294 Would you want to be on a warship that has a maximum effective range for incoming missiles of 6.2 miles? (the 57 mm is 9300 yards/5.28 miles or the RIM-116 of 10,900 yards/6.2 miles on an incoming warhead that's moving Mach 3 (for the Asif/Khalij Fars)?

Genial! Dieses Nachladesystem ist gut durchdacht.

リロードがスケベ過ぎる

My bunk used to be right beneath that bad boy, onboard a Gothenburg-class corvette, the firing is not that bad, but the hydraulics are loud af.

Great Video! Hats off!

interesting thanks. nice models

Bofors? BOFOR DEEZ NUTS OOOOOOOOH GOTTEM

Right On I always wanted to know

I’m sold, I’ll take two.

they actually have a modernized version of the Bofor 40mm L60 called the Bofors 40mm L70, and if your wondering, they do have a twin barreled CIWS of it called the OTO Melara Dardo.

Ok, but where do the shell cases go?

@pistonar

9 ай бұрын

Typically, the empties are kicked out under the gun on a chute going forward. In this case there would be a hole in the front of the turret. I suppose there could be a system for collecting the empties in a bin, but it would have to be part of the mount, and from the cutaway view there doesn't appear to be enough room, so they're likely discarded overboard

@scottgalbraith7461

9 ай бұрын

They roll around on deck.

@jstrat121

8 ай бұрын

Uhhh……ooops! LOL

@ZaHandle

8 ай бұрын

Here at Aperture Science we fire the whole bullet. That’s 66% more bullet, per bullet

great vid

結局、オートメーション化されても給弾方法は、昔のポンポン砲・日本の２５ｍｍ機銃と一緒だったのか！ でも、砲塔内に120発あるのはすごいと思うわ。即応弾がたくさんあっていいね

Works great as long as you definitely only want one kind of ammunition. Although I would guess the 2 sides could be configured separately to get 2 kinds and feed selectively to the gun.

Great Job

where does the shell casing go?

@Elthas17

9 ай бұрын

ejected out the front onto the deck usually, dont know this specific one.

なんて解りやすい動画なんだ！

Works well

凄ぇ。でっかいクリップ式みたいな装填を繰り返してるのか。

Just subbed i like these stuff

great animation. congratuations.

And that is just one reason why we have the most powerful military in the world. God bless America, and all of those to defend us.

@BilldalSWE

3 ай бұрын

It's a Swedish gun lol.

@Billsmorphboas8

3 ай бұрын

My bad I am glad that we are friends in that case. 😎🤣🤣

すごくわかりやすいです！

Amazing

terima kasih pencerahaannya...jadi tambah mengerti

Anyone know what the short term rate of fire (e.g. the first 20 rounds) vs long term (e.g. until the ship runs out) is? What limits the long term rate; heat or being secured to load from the hoists?

Superb video!

nice engineering

Very good. Can you have it on concealed carry?

Seems like there's good potential for ammo jamming.

上だけでもシステムが完結！ウクライナが今必要とする陸上砲にトレーラートラック式のボフォース57mmもイケます！巨大な可変翼対地攻撃機の背中にもこの艦載砲塔は積載可能です！(o´∀`)🇺🇦

@HNTR308

9 ай бұрын

💪🏼🇷🇺 Z

Very interesting. Do a video for the 40mm 76mm 127mmm Thanks.

How long is reload of stacks? Does ship have to disengage during reload?

Someone had their thinkin' cap on!

Bofors 🤘🏻💪🏻

Very interesting

amazing

127mmのMk45やオートメラーラとか76mm砲の解説もぜひお願いしたいです。

I like this powerful warships

Now show us how ammo is loaded into the ship's magazine in port :)

This is what you get, when you mate a Bofors 40mm, with a British 6lber...

good visualisation - where you get datashit for render?

Stripper clip tech from the 1800s still doing work in the 21st century.

This is totally amazing. I had no Earthly idea those deck guns were so powerful and durable.

@novacolonel5287

9 ай бұрын

This video tells you nothing about either of the two...

@rael5469

9 ай бұрын

@@novacolonel5287 Thumbs down.

@dundonrl

7 ай бұрын

57 mm gun isn't that powerful, not when you're shooting at enemy ships that are 10,000 tons!

@rael5469

7 ай бұрын

@@dundonrl Wait.....that gun would utterly destroy the bridge of an enemy ship. The bridge, the CIC.....etc. How about exploding a few shells right over the enemy missile launch tubes?

@dundonrl

6 ай бұрын

You have to get within range first! Also, you take out the bridge on a modern destroyer you're still not disabling the ship, it's still capable of fighting. Yes, you take out CIC and it's game over, but I'm not sure that it can penetrate into the CIC on say an Arleigh Burke DDG. It would be interesting to see, but I don't think the US Navy would sacrifice one of it's active duty warships for a test like that!@@rael5469

What is the extraction system, where do spent casings go?

very neat ,, Id like to see a real one running now though.

missing fuctionnning of atomatic canon , alimentation with 4 vertical mag, and ejection of empty case, ..... but your works is awsome thanks....

シンプルで扱いやすそう それでいて射程は76mmよりそんなに劣るわけではないから、米海軍が導入したがるのもわかる

Great animation, it was very clear. How long does a full reload take? It seems like it would take quite some time.

@joakimwohlfeil

9 ай бұрын

The animation is in slow motion. Everything goes much faster in reality

@mitchbarredo3990

6 ай бұрын

@@joakimwohlfeil Agreed. Irl I think it might take 20-30 seconds total?

激しく賢い！(語彙力捜索中)

I'd like to see real time. Thanks for the video.

Can the magazines been reloaded while the gun is firing?

The entire gun having to raise is a bit of an inconvenience I'd say, maybe if you wanna implement an auto loader you could do something similar to the amx-13, i dont know just an idea...

@novarat4089

8 ай бұрын

it probably doesnt run a mag empty often enough for it to be a problem during combat

I wish they had a video of this gun being all that it can be. I mean defending against an all out attack on the ship. How do they know what it can really do unless they test it to the max?

@nationeer

9 ай бұрын

Closest thing to this that came to my mind is a firing test video of it from 2002 where it unloads the rest of it's magazine at the end of the test

@rael5469

9 ай бұрын

@@nationeer I saw a few such vids and that air burst fragmentation munition looks VERY effective.

At the bottom ammunition hoist was it manually loaded by crew or was it a conveyer belt system?

@xxnightdriverxx9576

9 ай бұрын

The fact that it is fixed and required a stationary gun to get the ammunition up there leads me to believe that no crew is involved in filling the ammunition host. If the system would rotate with the gun, it would be much more challenging to design a system without any crew involved, but it would result in shorter breaks for reloading as you could move ammunition into the ready magazines in the gun while the gun is still fireing at other targets.

@SonsOfLorgar

9 ай бұрын

​@@xxnightdriverxx9576 not really, as the gun itself needs those breaks to not overheat the metal.

I want one!

LA VERDAD MUY BUEN VIDEO TE FELICITO NUNCA VI ALGO TAN BIEN EXPLICADO !!!

I want one of those ships.

HE POSTED AGAIN

Sure beats manually loading magazines like you see in films from WWII in the Pacific.

@TheAttacker732

9 ай бұрын

Each have their advantages. The manual hopper loading would allow you to continuously fire until the barrels melt, ammunition runs out, or the enemy breaks. The problem is just how much manpower it took to sustain any amount of cyclic firing at ~500-550 rounds per minute for the quad-40s. The autoloader removes the need for all that supporting manpower, but also removes the ability to sustain cyclic rate if the situation demands.