People who don't understand football say Carrick isn't a good player. Anyone who actually knows the game appreciates him.

4 жыл бұрын

Rubbish

@adamska4126

4 жыл бұрын

Who the hell says Carrick isnt a good player lol

@ashutoshmaraj4881

4 жыл бұрын

@@kincaidwolf5184 That's why England won f all. They had clowns like Gerrard and Lamard running like headless chickens everywhere.

@supersbbrawl4ever

3 жыл бұрын

@@kincaidwolf5184 Pep called Carrick one of the best holding midfielders he ever saw.

@androidbox1029

3 жыл бұрын

@@kincaidwolf5184 it was become 2017 derby. It was more like reconfirmation of what Pep said years earlier before Barca defeated United in the champions league final where pep mentioned that only carrick from the united team back then who could get into his barca team.

Stewart Downing has more caps than Carrick. Just let that one sink in.

@ObjectiveMedia

6 жыл бұрын

Carrick is a terrible footballer that’s why

@shanec3618

6 жыл бұрын

LiftedSlayer what an idiot

@jackanthony8308

6 жыл бұрын

LiftedSlayer do u even watch football?

@threelionsonourshirt8259

6 жыл бұрын

Cause woy had him at liverpool

@Two_Seat_Pete_FatA55

6 жыл бұрын

To be fair, Downing was one of the leading players for the amount of assists in Europe at one point. He also did very well at West Ham and Villa and Boro early on. People focus on his time at Liverpool where he was played out of position at left Back mostly. A very decent player at his best but probably not international quality. I agree though, Carrick should have been a mainstay in the England team.

Most English fans will never understand the value of a DLP. Carrick would've started in any national team in his prime. There's a reason why top tier managers like Ferguson, Guardiola, Mourinho and Van Gaal rate him so highly

@johnsamson5656

6 жыл бұрын

Arsene Wenger : "One of my regrets is never having had him as a player because I think he was one of the greatest players in English football.”

@TheRealMastalks

6 жыл бұрын

Mourinho doesn't rate him, he's barely played during Mou's tenure

@vapour9000

6 жыл бұрын

Lionel Sheriff Because he's 36 and he's been out for 3/4s of the season with heart problems...

@23CAREMUCH

6 жыл бұрын

Lionel Sheriff right... That's why Mourinho played him 28 times in his first season and hired him as a coach for his current staff. Makes sense.

@tejasmohite2651

6 жыл бұрын

Even pep said only carrick will fit in his team from current utd players

Carrick behind Gerrard and Lampard was just sitting there staring every England manager in the face but they were all to scared to move away from a 4-4-2

@rdh-daliasjb3796

3 жыл бұрын

Carrick and Scholes behind Gerrard or Lampard.

@arthurballs2754

3 жыл бұрын

They tried that with Barry. It was a joke. Lampard should've been dropped. England needed a proper DMF.

@thrilla72

3 жыл бұрын

@@arthurballs2754 So it should've been Scholes, Carrick and Hargreaves...oh wait, is that the midfield that got to two Champions League finals in a row?

@arsenalfan9213

2 жыл бұрын

Scholes at left mid makes me cry

@ScotisticDad

2 жыл бұрын

@@thrilla72 Funny they never just copy pasted.

Carrick one of the most under- rated midfielders ever. Every coach would praise him as one of the best in his position.

proven facts that english football appreciates more of a player who could run like a headless chicken, rather than the one who makes the ball roll around

Carrick was definitely undervalued and I love what Rio is saying about Carrick playing in the world up

Idiots managed England. Carrick was like an english busquets.

@samuoeno8972

6 жыл бұрын

KING-KAY GAMING looool Relax Hes a DM but not Busquets Alot of DMs were actually worldies Carrick couldnt break into the team simple Look at Kante for france Many examples of DMs

@yoogamsaikia8372

6 жыл бұрын

SAM UOENO He was undervalued. He wasn't given any proper chance. Barcelona and Spain were built around Busquets. If the team for once was built around Carrick we would've seen his real ability.

@alexeinicholas5071

6 жыл бұрын

SAM UOENO there’s a reason pep said carrick is one of the best DMs he’s ever seen

@rinshabbizarro1166

6 жыл бұрын

Nope.busquets is a English Carrick.

@fiftyIceStates

6 жыл бұрын

Except Kante is not a DLP, he's a BWM. Different types of a Defensive Midfielder.

As a Manchester United fan, I felt lost when we didn't have Carrick on. He has the creativity to get that ball forward. None of this BS side passing.

They deprived him of more caps just to satisfy Lampard and Steven Gerrard who can’t play at the midfield together.

@jesselioce

3 жыл бұрын

No they CAN play together. The problem was insisting on playing a 442. Just drop a striker and add scholes/carrick in front of defence. 4141

Sir Alex trust him so highly. I can't believe myself England didn't call him.

I got laughed at for saying how good Carick would be for us at the 2016 Euro’s, good to know the real pros agree with me

United signed Carrick in 2006 and Hargreaves in 2007. United went on to win 3 league titles and a UCL with the midfield of Scholes Carrick and Hargreaves (all 3 started the 08 UCL final). England’s template was right there in front of their eyes but the managers (Sven Capello etc. all blew it).

If Carrick was Italian or Spanish he would be the first name on the team sheet

England just don't relies how good some of their players are until they retire & regret it. They didn't learn their lesson with Paul Scholes & now history is repeating its self with Micheal Carrick

Carrick was class, great passes, short, long

I love Rio´s direct certainty and sticking up for his mate

Shaun Wright Phillips had more caps than Micheal Carrick. Take that in.

Because English fan was too hype with Gerrard and Lampard who had the same style in midfield. There was no creativity, they were wasting the energy to debate who would take the defensive responsibility more.

@jesselioce

3 жыл бұрын

4141 and problem solved. flat 442 even then was outdated

Carrick was England's own version of Italy's Andrea Pirlo - the greatest deep-lying playmaker in the world at the time

@the90sfattyfromtakethat

3 жыл бұрын

I think ur forgetting one mr scholes

@jesselioce

3 жыл бұрын

nah more like thiago motta or older de rossi at roma

The England mangers over the 2000s were naive. A lot of them didn’t want to move away from a 442 but when your playing a country like Spain in a hot country that formation wasn’t ideal. Gerrard and Lampard couldn’t play with each other and that’s a shame but playing a player like Carrick in behind Gerrard and Scholes would have made the game faster and efficient which would have lead us to quick successive counters.

Saw Carrick play a few times, one of the best players I’ve ever seen

Carrick could actually control a game and dictate play, Gerrard and Lampard have never done that in their lives. Shows how inept England managers have really been.

Liverpool fan but having carrick over Hnederson would improve us sooo much.

Loves Rios passion

Xavi and Pep always wanted Carrick to play with them but SAF would rather sell CR7 than let MC16 go

Rio has hit the nail on the head!

Carrick suffered from the 442 selection madness .

His two seasons at Spurs he was fantastic. Great DLP and much better in the tackle than people give him credit for. Not destructive but read the game so well and made vital interceptions while remaining on his feet to then go on andbuild quick attacks. Woefully underused by England.

@callumalston5755

Жыл бұрын

Actually played relatively similarly to busquets, not a destroyer, but a good tackler and had the ability to absolutely dictate the tempo of a football match.

Carrick is retired so currently the only solution in CDM position for england is Kalvin Philips . However he is currently playing in english championship but he have the potential to became the best of the world in that position if he getting chance. I cant see any potential in Delcan Rice and Erick Dier is totally out of form.

Players like Downing, Parker had more caps. Let that sink in

Regista

hargreves/carrick Gerrard Scholes Lampard If England used that midfield!!!!

@telephone1

6 жыл бұрын

They’d have no width or pace.

@zayn9239

6 жыл бұрын

telephone1 thats why fullbacks like ashley cole exist

@mashwork6615

6 жыл бұрын

Lampard isn’t a number 10 at all. He scored goals from runs from deep not in a number 10 position at all.

@logiatheories2576

6 жыл бұрын

Lol Lampard and Gerrard were rapid players

@izdatsumcp

6 жыл бұрын

telephone1 Dude. What? Midfielders aren't there to provide pace or width.

And this RIGHT here is why England doesn't have a Carrick/Scholes-like player. They threw them to the wayside and focused more on [god knows where] ... it's to the point where the entire COUNTRY has lost Deep-Lying-Playmakers in one Generation. I'll put it like this ... the best English CDM right now is ... Shelvey .... Think about that.

Shelvey is a liability at times, no doubt, but he's the only option, IMO.

@jackjelf07

6 жыл бұрын

nemtizz big liability. I'm from Swansea and am a Swansea gan and he's by far the most frustrating player I've ever watched. All the talent in the world but he just wants to walk around the pitch acting the tough guy.

@oscarkulkarni6112

6 жыл бұрын

nemtizz maybe but he is to dirty on the pitch it will cost him

@TheFinalStand7

6 жыл бұрын

Newcastle fan here and Shelvey Single handedly at times won us the game with his quality. No red cards or yellow cards in 2018. I think Rafa has calmed him down. Definitely should be in the England squad.

@juliusoyoyah5903

6 жыл бұрын

Aaron Martin True, I was disappointed he wasn't picked........ he really has improved under Benitez and would have been a better option in England's midfield

Lingaard and creative 😂😂

Many people said why the combinations between Scholes-Gerrard-Lampard didn't came good like everyone expect...because their not Xavi-Busquets-Iniesta..see the reason ? Their don't have player like Busquets. The almost similar player like Busquets is Michael Carrick... As a Chelsea fans, I still don't understand why England manager didn't call Carrick to top competition??

@FEDEXLuchs

7 ай бұрын

he was called they just didnt use him and the Trio should of been Scholes Carrick and with Ger or lampard rotating

Carrick was quality whoever he played for. Like many players before him, England always have picked box to box players ahead of vision players.

Carrick starts for any team in England rn, maybe even Europe.

In these guys time only Liverpool United and Chelsea players had more Caps but United had most of Englands squad it would of been like Juventus in Italy squad but Carrick was a sensation to watch like a Matic/Kante in one on the pitch

All players of this type are undervalued generally, but exactly as Rio says, if he was Italian, Spanish or German, he would be celebrated as one of the greatest players of all time.

This is so true

The problem with the England national team is the coach..too adamant on using the 4-4-2 system when they should have used 4-3-3..neville and cole on fullback..carrick, scholes and beckham in midfield..gerrard, lampard and rooney upfront..would be an ideal setup considering they had a lack of talented strikers at that time

@jesselioce

3 жыл бұрын

dude no 4141 scholes and later carrick in front of defence. lamps and stevie box to box, joe cole cutting inside from the left with a cole doing the overlap. hargreaves inverted rb joining central midfield and becks on the right. or neville as classic rb depending on the opposition. Lamps and stevie are not wingers for a 433 and playing as 2 nr 10s in a 4321 also is not their strong suit

Severely underrated

Top top player

Should have played a diamond of Carrick Gerrard Scholes Lampard But the England managers didnt know any formation other than a 442 flat

@mohamadsyahmizainuddin6179

6 жыл бұрын

No Name good formation..but need to keep in mind..there was david beckham

@mashwork6615

6 жыл бұрын

Lampard is not a number 10 at all. Joe Cole would have been perfect for that role but Lampard is a central midfielder/box to box midfielder

@samuoeno8972

6 жыл бұрын

Looool No wingers? Pace? Craft? Dribblers? Actual CAMs Lampard was CM turned Cam becuz he scored so many goals

@logiatheories2576

6 жыл бұрын

Gerrard and Lampard were rapid and could play on the wings

@yoogamsaikia8372

6 жыл бұрын

No Name Might have worked with 2 pacey strikers. Scholes laying long balls.

Agreed, in many ways, Michael Carrick was a very underrated player. Should have had many more caps.

Carrick can pass 60 yards across the field....england players cant carry the ball towards the goal like spain or germany .....but england got really fast wingers.....and carrick could have made things easy .....

why the england managers dint put Carrick in midfield and drag Scholes out of retirement is beyond me, these to was a partnership and was performing at the top level in champions league time and time again.

That's because of the English footballing culture doesn't allow for smart players like him

He is the English Sergio Busquets

More or less just justified why shelvey should go to the world cup

England never had a good coach That's y they never saw Carrick

agree

Always said he was the cloests thing to an English Busquets

England would have more world cups if they werent so hyper focused on having Lampard and Gerrard in the lineup...

Carrick 10 times better than gareth Barry...

midfield 3 in russia should be Carrick/Milner/Henderson

England need Jay Spearing in the upcoming World Cup

Tall,big and handsome.

in an alternate universe where carrick never signed for united.... rio: he is too slow, and a liability defensively

Best name for hin is the Assasin!

England should radar next carrick

If I'm not mistaken, he mentioned in an interview that traveling with the national team was not good for him mentally. He suffered depression and I believe it was his call to not be featured for international duty. It's not a matter of him being undervalued or unlucky, traveling with the national team was not for him and people have to accept that. I am kind of surprised that Rio Ferdinand, his teammate and captain, didn't know that though.

Oh please Carrick is constantly called underrated, in my books someone underrated isn’t constantly labelled ‘underrated

Why are the BT Sport panel always talking about the past? Get over it. Focus on who is playing well now and stop debating what could've been. Whoppers.

'If he was Italian, he would be playing now for Italy' 😂😂😂 Rio, bless his cotton socks. I struggle to think of a single English player who would get into an Italy side. And yet Carrick would play for Italy? Carrick picked up practically the same number of caps as Zola and Mancini for Italy. These people constantly living in a bubble.

@pragunahuja6879

2 жыл бұрын

Carrick destroyed roma. Man u 7-1 ucl 2007.pep called him the best player at utd. Criminally underused by England due to obsession with lampard and gerrad

One of the most unrated player in his generation. # Michael Carrick

England have had endless closed minded managers. Venables would have picked him. I can't think of a more creative, risk taking England manager.

Watch the champions league final vs Barcelona X2 and watch how great Carrick was.. Looked lost

@akshatbetala2813

3 жыл бұрын

Mate see Gerrard against United at ot he was lost when he did not have a penalty kick to score

Typical utd always over hyping there average players as long as there at the club... Lol if cleverly didn't leave they'd be saying the same thing about him

I am a Carrick type player😎 but runs faster

Jonjo

Shelvy

The English busquets

😂

England let McTominey slip through the net!

Carrick was in a generation with too much midfield competition, scholes, gerrard, lampard to name a few

@imo098765

3 жыл бұрын

yet Gerrard and Lampard did nothing together both do the same thing and probably not a popular opinion Lampard wasnt as good a midfielder people make him out to be especially compare to Gerrard and Scholes. Even in the great Chelsea sides he had Ballack, Essien, Makelele etc behind him and they are the ones that kept the midfield running. Also Scholes was played on the LW for England and probably why he stopped earlier than what was needed too.

@the90sfattyfromtakethat

3 жыл бұрын

@@imo098765 can’t believe they never achieved anything together, egos I think.

It was bad enough talking about these chumps back in the day. Now we have a new generation can we please forget about the dead wood that did not win fxxk all. We had 2 central midfielders (Lamps+Gerrard) who scored 15 plus a season for there clubs. Most strikers now get nowhere near that. Your telling me Carrick should have forced one of them out ? There was a toxic attitude in the camp. I suspect from too much media scrutiny. They all should have done much better. Only one worth talking about who got the job done was Peter Crouch. An nobody will ever wax lyrical about him.

@chris2156741988

6 жыл бұрын

I think the point is if Lampard and Gerrard had someone like Carrick sitting behind them to screen the defence then those two could go and do what they're best at. Instead Lampard and Gerrard always had to cover for each other because we were still stuck in the 442 is best for too many years and had no plan b or c. Best example is Sergio Busquets, just sits there, intercepts the ball gives it Iniesta or Xavi before he moved on. Undervalued players that are huge for a football team

@paulgibbons2320

6 жыл бұрын

Chris Elphick Bottom line is. lamps an Gerrard were too good to drop. But they brought the same thing to a team.

@logiatheories2576

6 жыл бұрын

Lamps and Gerrard were totally incomparable. Sure, Carrick would've done a better job in CDM but Gerrard could play there too. Furthermore, Gerrard was a physical box-to-box midfield with a world class passing and shooting ability in one player. Lampard was a deep-lying attacking midfielder with the best attacking vision ive ever seen. Defensive liability but that's what Gerrard was for. If Carrick was 5 years younger he'd be on his way to 70+ caps, but he was kept out of the side by two of the 5 best midfielders in the world at the time (the others being Pirlo, Xavi and Iniesta)

@fiftyIceStates

6 жыл бұрын

At the end of the day, they didn't produce anything. That is the POINT. They had a decade (+) to figure out a working formula and they couldn't pull it off with those two (Gerrard/Lampard) at the helm.

@parashit2181

6 жыл бұрын

Lampard and Gerrard had the same style, but none of them could sent the ball forward as good as Carrick. They have Xabi, Mascherano, Makelele, Essien, and more world class midfielder behind them when playing with their club. Anyone who thinks 4-4-2 with Gerrard and Lampard in midfield would be great is dumb.

Carrick had chances at England and never took em. Still baffles me how people say Carrick is like Paul Scholes.. Scholes scored over 100 gaols, carrick is no different to the modern Declan Rice and he looks ordinary

Carrick looked out of place in champions league finals vs Barcelona

Sorry but he was over rated so was was Hargreaves he was in a better team but he is better than England’s current midfield come on Jack wilshire is rubbish

For Ferdinand all the players from Man Utd are outstanding. Carrick is ok, that’s it, on same league as Henderson, possibly even Drinkwater. Owen Hargreaves on its prime was much better playing in this position..

@izdatsumcp

6 жыл бұрын

Carrick, Scholes and Hargreaves won the CL playing together in midfield for Man Utd. That is outstanding. Also, comparing Carrick to Henderson/Drinkwater is a crime.

Ex footballers trying to appear like they have a brain cell lol 😆

Overrated Scholes.. Retired thanks to Lampard and Gerrard

i disagree. We had way better midfielders than carrick over the time.

@s.a.6377

6 жыл бұрын

Gerrard and Lampard were to similar. Should've been a 4-3-3 with those to and Scholes holding and then Carrick when Scholes retired

@logiatheories2576

6 жыл бұрын

Gerrard and Lampard were nothing alike other than their ability in front of goal. Lampard destroyed defences with his vision and tricky runs, Gerrard played as a box-to-box and did a little bit of every midfield role, including how Carrick plays. It's because of Gerrard that Carrick got so few caps

@logiatheories2576

6 жыл бұрын

I was simply saying Gerrard picked out the same kind of passes as Carrick did, hence Carrick was overlooked. I don't think it can be justified as to how Carrick didn't get many caps after Gerrard retired from international football, but up until that point his low number of caps made sense

If anything he was OVERRATED

@akshatbetala2813

3 жыл бұрын

Nonsense

Carrick is good player but not a great one. He is a good passer of the ball but technically not good enough to hold the ball and compete at the highest level especially for England.

@akshatbetala2813

3 жыл бұрын

He was great. He stayed all the big matches for man United. He was world class for 2 seasons. He was the man.

@rahmanramli7818

3 жыл бұрын

@@akshatbetala2813 ...world class...😂...he is not in the class of Pirlo.. Zidane..Xavi..Iniesta. Carrick is a good and honest player.

@akshatbetala2813

3 жыл бұрын

@@rahmanramli7818 son watch him from 2010 to 2013 he was the best player in the premier league even Wenger and Fergie said it. He was amazing. Scholes says he was world class so does everyone else. I thought he was better for England with Gerrard than Lampard was

@rahmanramli7818

3 жыл бұрын

@@akshatbetala2813 ...yeah...in epl he was perhaps one of the best midfielder...with Lampard and Gerrard

@pragunahuja6879

2 жыл бұрын

@@rahmanramli7818 but not good enough for England. U are so deluded.

Underrated? More like overrated... it's unbelivable how much people talk about such a mediocare player... had nothing special and was lucky to have the best manager of all time

Carrick is the most OVER RATED player in football history. A man united fan.

@king-kaygaming4692

6 жыл бұрын

Not a United fan.

@TheNikhilyo

6 жыл бұрын

U Haven't been a fan for a long time it seems or are u even a fan😂

@ObjectiveMedia

6 жыл бұрын

Nikhil Shivasankar lol I’ve watched and supported united for 30 years. I know my football. So I think it’s safe to say that I’m a proper untied fan.

@ObjectiveMedia

6 жыл бұрын

KING-KAY GAMING I’m not a united fan cause I think carrick is another overrated English player? Lol k den

@TheNikhilyo

6 жыл бұрын

30 years n u don't know the value of Carrick😂 I'm not saying he's d best there is but he is quality 🙌

Carrick is the worst Utd player of all time.

@arrowstormbreaker3518

6 жыл бұрын

Lame boring🙄🙄

@king-kaygaming4692

6 жыл бұрын

The Troll in this one is real strong.

@thewood1239

4 жыл бұрын

Fred RED more one if the best, he had the. Vision