While I sometimes struggle a little to understand the experts being interviewed on this channel, for the first time I have to admit that I have not the faintest idea what this chap was talking about. What I did like was the comment, after he somehow twisted his arm through 720 degrees, "You've done that before"! 😁

@Joseph-fw6xx

8 ай бұрын

Don't feel bad Einstein couldn't understand this guy

@mario26072

8 ай бұрын

Time is timeless (time less time) passed- presant -future (the same thing)

@RobYoung74

8 ай бұрын

Total gobbledygook. I think 3 or 4 pints might help…

@David.C.Velasquez

8 ай бұрын

@@RobYoung74 Just because you don't understand E8 lattice mathematics, as a potential predictive model, doesn't make it gobbledygook. Maybe you'd be better to stick with Sabine's channel.

@jimbo33

8 ай бұрын

Exactly 😂😂😂

Way above my brain capacity to deal with the subject but still able to be totally mesmerized by someone able to see and understand time clearly... Truly amazing. 🙏

Well this is certainly good news! Oh wait actually I have no idea what any of this means

This was easily the funniest conversation on Closer to Truth in recorded history. I loved it so much. I am going to go off and have a good look at this. Imagine if this is tied together! Sometimes, however, I have a hard time imagining that there aren't still plenty of fundamentals that we have no idea about, and that is what makes a unifying theory still seem slightly premature.

I believe the result of the gentleman's hypothesis is that geometry builds and multiplies upon itself leading to the process of time. To understand it as being infinite imagine the depth of fractals (it keeps going on). It clicked when he demonstrated his concept with the phone. Very interesting. Another way to understand this would be to imagine a geometrical buildup of energy that can be perceived. I believe this would be coherent with what we know as 'awareness'.

This theory, adding spin interactions, finally brings time into a conceptional reality for me. I think this makes time an emergent phenomenon, not fundamental.

@TylerAndortyandor

8 ай бұрын

Hawking came to such a view of time and the laws of physics, according to his collaborator Thomas Hertog (in On the Origin of Time)

@ToddDesiato

8 ай бұрын

Time is what clocks measure. Nothing more, nothing less. Choose your clock wisely!

@Bill..N

8 ай бұрын

@@ToddDesiato Nothing deeper than that?

@ToddDesiato

8 ай бұрын

@@Bill..N Nope, nothing. Every atom is its own clock and keeps time at its own rate, depending only on the gravitational potential it interacts with.

@Bill..N

8 ай бұрын

@ToddDesiato Well, that's fine then.. Not particularly persuasive, but a better idea than many I have heard...

I really wish you guys would put in the description or somewhere in the video when these interviews were filmed. This is obviously at least 10 years old, which is fine, but a lot of these videos seem to be presented as cutting edge theories when many have already been proven years ago (like this one) very unlikely to be correct. I'm not even sure if Garrett is still working on this theory anymore. It would be great if you could give us an ACTUAL description in the description. Thanks

"Ok, now get to time"😂❤❤

I like it… Especially “The Vortex Well” creating “Time”… It’s 3:6:9 Quantum Implosion Electric Vortex Physics…

Lisi says he is extremely confident about his result regarding the time aspect of his theory. Unfortunately for him, I can assure you that what he's saying is nothing more than a mathematical exercise without any relation to reality. For instance, he talks of De Sitter space, spacetime, and length contraction. However, none of these things exist in reality. It is nothing more than fancy mathematics, without any relation to real physics. So this all doesn't give any insight into the concept of time 😞

Spacetime frame at rest - relative to what? To avoid causality-breaking CTCs with a Warpdrive, it is necessary to have a universal rest frame. Is that what he's saying?

How Garrett didn't drop his phone is mighty impressive.

@bern047

8 ай бұрын

he copied Dirac but didn't mention him ?

This is truly fascinating, and I'm doing my best to grasp the concepts being discussed. Garrett's demonstration to illustrate spin and particle orientation is incredibly intuitive. The idea of attaching a clock to the particle to help explain time's role in this context is a clever realization. As particles move through the spacetime manifold, they also move in time depending on their speed, which is a concept that's challenging to put into words but seems essential to understanding the intricacies of quantum behavior. I'm particularly intrigued by the relationship between spin and quantum field theory. The Dirac belt trick and the notion of holding an object to convey spin and degrees of freedom for different particles are captivating. It appears that these particles are intrinsically connected to spacetime itself, and their movements are subject to unique restrictions, which is reflected in their spins. For instance, photons with a spin of 1 can be likened to rotating a card 360 degrees to return to its original orientation, while electrons with a spin of 1/2 are connected by tendrils or fibers, which limits their movement. It's intriguing to consider that the universe seems to maintain conservation laws even in rotational symmetries, leading to the observed spin behaviors. Exploring these concepts, particularly through the lens of degrees of freedom for rotation, can provide a more intuitive understanding of quantum behavior. I share your enthusiasm for the potential implications of these insights, and I hope that we're moving in the right direction toward a theory of everything. Achieving such a theory could indeed open up numerous opportunities in science and technology, advancing our understanding of the universe in profound ways.

Is he describing angular momentum/velocity of the e8 lattice?

My ideal concept of time is when I can stay home in the woods without any demands on me except for doing my own stuff and sitting on my screen porch sipping a cool one. Don't need any Higgs Field when you got that.😂

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

8 ай бұрын

*"Don't need any Higgs Field when you got that."* ... These crazy-wild theories regarding time demonstrate how physicists and mathematicians aren't immune from trying to solve imaginary mysteries.

@browngreen933

8 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC So true. They fly so far off into the weeds it's almost like spiritualist or religious mania. 🤔

@David.C.Velasquez

8 ай бұрын

Then why waste your time watching and commenting to this channel?

@David.C.Velasquez

8 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC " These crazy-wild theories regarding time demonstrate how physicists and mathematicians aren't immune from trying to solve imaginary mysteries." I would expect this type of contrarian attitude from a layperson, but you have a published 'book' and maintain that you are a learned scholar on such matters. Just because you don't understand E8 lattice mathematics, as a potential predictive model, doesn't make it a useless crazy-wild theories. The constant misuse of the word 'theory' by you, and others, is frustrating.

@brothermine2292

8 ай бұрын

​@@David.C.Velasquez: Lisi calls it his "theory of everything" and it's known as E8 Theory. In what way do you think 0-by-1's reply misused the word "theory?" It looks like E8 Theory was an interesting math exercise, but it appears to have several intractable problems and has been heavily criticized by other physicists. It's a good bet, though, that its actual problems are unrelated to 0-by-1's motivation for calling it crazy.

expansion of space (present) by electromagnetic field that measures particles from quantum probabilities? particles develop mass which increase time below speed of light?

Having another candidate for the flow of time apart from entropy is something that excites me. The theory seems far from being completely baked yet though. But things like these give hope. I wish Lisi and his collaborators all the best for the future!

I love Closer to the Truth , now understanding this way past my GED pay grade, I must admit, I’m more confused than before, oh well say-lave 🤭👍👀

Time is easy, it's always now. The eternal ever-present moment of now. You can dilate it, you can compress it, but it is always now. Singular in its existence. You cannot exist outside of the moment of now, you are the moment of now. It is in fact the only constant.

@Bill..N

8 ай бұрын

Have you considered the implications of Einsteins' insight that there are no simultaneous NOWS for any observers?

@ronhudson3730

8 ай бұрын

So, now is relative to the observer. We can accept that. The bigger idea is that we live in the eternal now. From the beginning to the end of existence we live in an eternal now. One remembers past nows and anticipates future now’s. They are all real and all exist simultaneously.

@Bill..N

8 ай бұрын

@ronhudson3730 For practical purposes, of course you are right, friend.. Still, SOME might argue that is the metaphorical equivalent of sticking your head in the sand.. Oddly, it is the prevailing view that even a single person does not interact with ANY conception of the word NOW (a misnomer), partially but not only, because of the conduction speed of nerve signals through the body and brain.. Such considerations may seem trivial, especially given our SENSATION of the smooth continuity of awareness, but from a scientific perspective, it certainly isn't.. One humble opinion..

@Bill..N

8 ай бұрын

@@ronhudson3730 Edited my comment for grammar..

@REDPUMPERNICKEL

8 ай бұрын

Easy to understand that past and future do not exist but a little trickier to grasp that neither is there a now. What exists are things moving and our thoughts about them and our thoughts consist of the complex patterned movements of a host of things.

GAWD, that was fascinating.

Wonderfully 👍

He's correct. ✅️

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

So you agree with his imagination? Silly humans! Read more non-fiction.

Very cool.

Time only has meaning when there is motion.

@haxstir

8 ай бұрын

Motion relative to what though?

@strings41

8 ай бұрын

@@haxstir Imagine you are in a system where nothing moves (changes.) How would you measure time?

@CMVMic

8 ай бұрын

​​@@strings41you cant and thats because measurement itself presupposes change

@haxstir

8 ай бұрын

@@strings41 I don't disagree with you but the point I was making was that that time (or motion) is only relative to a point of view, or having a position from which things can be measured. If you don't have a viewpoint (as in a consciousness) from which something can be measured then what happens to measurement?

@strings41

8 ай бұрын

@@haxstir Good point. Of course this topic is an exercise in abstract thinking, which is good for mental depth.

Nobel prize for this man.

Analoging particles interactions with rotations is insightful i think.

I don't have the background to conceptualize this theory but the mystery of time is of great interest to me and I like listening to the the theories about it. I agree with scientists who suggest it's probably not fundamental. Illusive as it is, I do think its true nature will be uncovered someday.

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

Fundamental? Someday? You really don’t understand time do you? Let us help you. Time is fundamental. We do not experience anything fundamental without time. Time is the fabric of the universe. Everything forms through time. Time equals energy. For example, you said someday. We do not experience day without our star the sun. When you said day you were calculating time by the motion of the Earth orbiting our star, the sun. No star no day. When we see our star, the sun, we are seen time in action. We experience time through our star the sun. We experience time every day! This video is pseudoscience. Read more nonfiction. Dictionary. Encyclopedia. Thesaurus.

@Kritiker313

8 ай бұрын

@@tyroneallen7857 Thank goodness we had the ancient Greeks to show us that the earth is not flat and then Einstein who proved that time doesn’t tick at the same rate for people in different states of motion. You speak of simple subjective experience, not what I’m talking about and certainly not what this video is about.

But is it all fire or all water? That said, the calculations they must be making are amazing. 'Don't disturb my circles' - Archimedes

So was this filmed on RLK's private jet as he was making a refueling stop in Hawaii?😂

Tendré que ver ésto otras 4 veces

Because an observer in a different frame sees a moving object get shorter doesn't mean the object actually got shorter. An observer moving with the object can measure that the object did not get shorter despite what the the person in the other frame sees.

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

You can also conclude you're not moving even though you are, depending of your choice of reference frame.

IT IS LIKE TIME TRAVEL TOO

How long did it take for time to emerge?

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

Time is the fabric of the universe. Time is the energy that gives things the ability to emerge and exist. Everything emerges from Time. When you asked the question how long you were asking about an aspect of time. Duration. Length of time! The redundancy of your question answers itself. Time is the answer for everything.

Robert sir, please, prioritize this before your friends and beliefs, if you are a genuine seeker: 1. Upanishads, translated by Nikhilananda's 4 volume set, and 18 principal Upanishads translated by Radhakrishnan 2. Vivekacudamani, by Sankara, translated by Madhavananda 3. Upadesa Sahashri, by Sankara, translated by Jagadananda

@michellereed2535

8 ай бұрын

I prefer Chewbacca's 3 volume epic "RRWWWGG"," GGWWWRGHH" and "RAWRGWAWGGR." Translated by Hans Solo

Did anyone get it?

Can you tackle the topic about passion or element or ikigai.

When he says there are other areas of his "theory" that is not as confident about, it makes me think of the physicists who want to get away from being dependent on using the standard model to describe everything. It seems like the real problems with his theoretical theory might simply be where he hasn't found a description that can depart from the standard model. I'm pretty sure I understood the smallest part of his description, but that is the sort of impression I get, and I wonder how magical/fuzzy the math is when assigning numbered values through the higgs field functions.

A time tracking device, a clock, is not time. Such a tracker is subject to internal and external physical influences such as speed, the force of gravity and the lack thereof, quantum field and so forth. When the time tracker is impacted so as to lose its internal calibration, it simply malfunctions resulting into a speeding up or slowing down in its time tracking system. Using a physical device as time itself is misleading and incorrect.

I have hard time relying on a person saying "right" after every statement.

When he says he gets time out of the symmetry breaking, does this mean he also gets classical newtonian gravity out of it there? I liked his story about special relativity as a perspective (like projective geometry, but a rotation instead), starting to like this theory this way.

This person’s explanation reminds me of Eric Ross Weinstein’s explanations of his theory of everything, but ∞less abstruse!! Must go with the territory.

Time is just the measure of change

How about a dimension composed of a counting of something that repeats.

God, creator, creation force- how ever one wants to refer to it must be a master mathematician

What does he mean by his theory explaining which time frame is "at rest"?

@hakiza-technologyltd.8198

8 ай бұрын

That guy has no clue what he was talking about. First all there is no way one can explain time before describing the notion of real and imaginary time as Hawking did.

@johnfowler3132

8 ай бұрын

I had to punt when he did not specify "at rest with respect to what?" There is no absolute standard of rest. So I guess he's saying that different rotations are happening in different moving reference systems, which makes no sense to me. Note that the "rotation" of the time axis in one system relative to that of a differently moving system is considered a "pseudo-rotation", and even that is a very specific rotation that has nothing to do with particles interacting. And yet he does seem to have some credentials.

Are we just going to pretend like this guy didn’t magically twist his arm 360 degrees without dropping his phone??

thank you for inviting AG, was looking forward for this 👌

Robert understands these guy's amazing

@brianjanku4549

8 ай бұрын

I don't think anyone understood him.

How could we can set a direction to time in a 3 dimensional space it’s a always changing in 360’ orbital path whether it’s a planet or galaxy then orbital path will be the time just like earth going with sun 365 days of time

This might be helpfull for Beginners like me :)

@martinleibacher9367

8 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/Y6t1w6uYZsWfeqg.html

..time is the measurement of motion, twisting, spinning, etc. these are all different types of motion, the better you can describe motion the better you can describe time, but Without Motion There Is No Time...

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

Without time there is no motion. Time is the fabric of the universe. Time is energy. Energy causes motion. There cannot be motion without energy. How? Motion without energy. Doesn’t make sense. Motion without time. Doesn’t make sense. Time is the reason for everything. we keep giving this information away for free because it’s necessary. The theory of everything is time. Time is everything and everything is time!

@GBuckne

8 ай бұрын

@@tyroneallen7857 time is a concept it is not tangible, and you have turned it to physical tangible thing...

Garrett's E8 theory should not be ignored.. That being said, to ME, it almost sounds hallucinogenic.. It seems impossible to imagine a mathmatical "object" like the E8 lie group physically existing and able to create everything by changing/moving/twisting without the prior existence of time enabling such actions.. VERY possibly, I'm just ignorant here. Maybe someone can clarify..

@xtratub

8 ай бұрын

All possible arrows of time and universes don't need to jump into existence, they are comfortably "exists" as eternal possibilities

@Bill..N

8 ай бұрын

@xtratub PLEASE expand on that friend, especially as it relates to the E8 theory. Thanks for your response..

@xtratub

8 ай бұрын

@@Bill..N No time, no space. Only illusions, possibilities, potentials, math relations, interactions networks with notdeteministic links between, just like one rotation can be viewed as two others in different combinations, or like nothing can be sum of somethings with opposite sign. Well, thats all.

@Bill..N

8 ай бұрын

@xtratub I can't see that perspective at all, friend.. The universe appears to be a very real PHYSICAL construct.. To say it is merely an illusion, well, that just flies in the face of our BEST current theories.. It sounds like an extraordinary claim with NO evidence at all to support it.. No?

@peterdamen2161

8 ай бұрын

@@xtratub Let me tell you, the arrow of time doesn't exist at all.

could quantum time become mass in classic space?

oh, wow, cool. Dimensions are perpendicular, making rotations in the highest dimension orthogonal to the lower dimensions in a reference frame not rotating in the time direction compared to the observer frame. We literally see the dimensional flatness of 3 dimensions as time dilation, and everything emerges from the geometry of rotations of whatever spacetime is. (I have no idea what's going on, I'm just doing my part to pollute the available training data that gets scraped for training ai language models. They think they can make ai that's smarter than us by training it on available human knowledge? fight fire with fire.)

So, how does conscious experience fit into his TOE ? Can’t be ignored if it’s a TOE

@johnyaxon__

8 ай бұрын

Consciousness is Symmetry breaking

@johnyaxon__

8 ай бұрын

Imagine a pencil lying down on a table. This is very symmetrical state for the pencil. But then consciousness breaks the symmetry of a pencil and start drawing. That symmetry breaking is consciousness. Particles don't want to construct a cell, but consciousness is forcing them to construct cells, organisms , societies etc. Consciousness is what fights against "laws of physics" . Physics of body want just lie on the bed, but consciousness is forcing body to get up and do something. Also consciousness is that force, that works against gravity. Birds, planes, spaceships - all are constructions of consciousness. So real anti-gravity is consciousness

@ral1020

8 ай бұрын

@@johnyaxon__ Existence is resistance and resistance causes consciousness to evolve

@johnyaxon__

8 ай бұрын

@@ral1020 Also, imagine the following picture: make creatures, including people, invisible in your imagination. This picture is what I call a "strange planet". So: bicycles drive by themselves, cars drive by themselves, swings swing by themselves, doors open and close by themselves, spoons and forks fly, beds make themselves, complex structures assemble by themselves, stones melt and structure themselves into airplanes, ships, rockets, cars and other complex shapes. Also, skyscrapers are built by themselves, higher and higher, cities appear out of nowhere. Strange planet. A kind of evolving field that seems to be divided only if you are inside and part of this field. But if you see this field, imagining people invisible, then very strange things will begin to happen. It's as if some spirit or spirits are living on the planet. I think that this spirit is consciousness. Something invisible that causes everything to structure itself and behave contrary to the laws of physics. A certain field that permeates everything.

@ral1020

8 ай бұрын

@@johnyaxon__ I like your examples. I do believe that consciousness is fundamental. Here's a quote from Max Planck: "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness."

The old iPhone model gave this video away as potentially being very old :)

Time is the distance between A + B

Good Qustions #121-does time shrink with matter? Smaller animals like mice have shorter lifespans,but do they experience it at the same rate as us? (Feels like 80years?)🤔 I know science has proved gravity can slow the passage of time,but how is time experienced by microscopic organisms?

@chimpinabowtie6913

8 ай бұрын

The way all mammals have roughly the same number of heartbeats over a lifespan is interesting.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

8 ай бұрын

@@chimpinabowtie6913 *"The way all mammals have roughly the same number of heartbeats over a lifespan is interesting."* ... I noticed that every yardstick I've ever encountered is exactly three feet long. ... That's just crazy!

@chimpinabowtie6913

8 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC It's in reference to time being relative, and yes, if a creature lives for 6 months or 200 years their hearts will have beaten the same number of times. I guess you thought you were making some smart arse point 🤷‍♂️

@David.C.Velasquez

8 ай бұрын

I believe so. Try to imagine scale as a 4th spatial dimension, with associated time dilation. Expansion and contraction, being equivalent to translation in this case. Addressing 0-by-1 yardstick analogy, as a thought experiment... You measure the speed of light in comparison to the yardstick, then 'expand' to the size of the galaxy, for instance. Now re-measure the speed of light, with regards to your also expanded yardstick, and with much longer wavelength light, which, from your perspective will have blue shifted to appear as the same wavelength used initially, as in your frame of reference time will have dilated such that the same lightspeed value is measured.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

8 ай бұрын

@@chimpinabowtie6913 *"I guess you thought you were making some smart arse point"* ... Yes, I was poking fun at myself and not you.

Bilateral Symmetry

Where does the ball of 200+ dimensions come from?

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

8 ай бұрын

*"Where does the ball of 200+ dimensions come from?"* ... It's what you find dangling at the end of one of those mysterious "strings" in String Theory.

@xtratub

8 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC i think Max Tegmark knows the answer

I thought for sure Garrett was going to drop his phone. He seems to understand what he's talking about. I, on the other hand, well, it might take me a while. What's a lead group?

@sentefmi

8 ай бұрын

Lie group: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_group

You need a numeric coordinate system to evaluate which LIe group complex circle'transformations are symmetric * , but since the horizontal axis includes non-number "-" meaning negative concatenated with aspatio-temporal unique number "1" for the imaginary number, you're left with syntactic, but not semantic, means for it. * Mathemaniac, "What is LIe theory, here is the big picture", KZread.

start, change, stop = time

Can we have a diagram plesse😅

Ok.

Since time is non- dimensional its logarithm is zero (Boltzmann's constant?). If time moved there would be no entropy.

At one point he sounded like this theory could give you absolute space coordinates. (The opposite of Relativity.) Very interesting. I hope to hear more of Garrett's theory, if possible.

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

He did not make one point. So what are you saying? You want to hear more confusion? All he offered was his confused imagination. Read more non-fiction. For example, time is the fabric of the universe. Space is human imagination based on fiction. Time is everything and everything is time. For example we experience time through our star the sun. Read more non-fiction. This video is pseudoscience.

@simonhibbs887

8 ай бұрын

I'm not sure whether what he was saying was that for any point in the universe there is a single rest frame predicted by his theory, or whether he was saying that a concept of relative rest frames emerges from his theory. I looked up an article he wrote on the theory, and it's not clarified there either.

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

@@simonhibbs887 you are not sure what he was saying because what he was saying was unintelligible. Garbled dribble. Nonsense. Time is not a clock. Clocks are instruments humans use to end accurately measure time! This video is pseudoscience. We experience time through our star, the sun. no star no oxygen. No oxygen, no consciousness. No consciousness no observations. He was not sharing a theory. He was sharing his imagination. Not even a hypothesis. Embarrassing! Time is the fabric of the universe. The theory of everything is time.

Guy It inst correct. Fundamental Law of phich show undertimate particles are in and out at same and not time. Phich quanta time isnt existe in Particles field . Guys please check in Weiner Heisenbeger and Schordiger cat books.

There's always that I suppose? 🤨

No idea

Advances in science often simplify our understanding of phenomena. We know time is complicated, but using a Lie group? Looks like someone is trying to use epicycles again...

@chimpinabowtie6913

8 ай бұрын

I can imagine how hard Einstein's eyes would be rolling listening to this... 🙄

Time is broken up activities being brought together or separating through measurements of time.

Did he travel back in time to get that phone?

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

All the videos on this channel are quite old.

Time is entropy entropy is time from everything to particles to us humans life and stars

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

That doesn't explain why it is increasing and not decreasing.

@johnyaxon__

8 ай бұрын

​@@andreicristian9575because

0:21 ... so you claim that your new Theory of Everything your E8 Theory can explain time. I'm skeptical so tell me. 0:27 GL: ... 2:08 so the way time emerges is actually quite interesting ...

The connection between relativity gravity, and the quantum is time. For example, time produces energy and energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. There is no space. Space is human imagination based on science fiction. Read more non-fiction. The theory of everything is time! Time is everything and everything is time! Simple. Time is the fabric of the universe from the most distant quasars in the universe to the oxygen in our blood we find time. For example, oxygen in our DNA. Do you want the answer or are you comfortable with ignorance? Take your time!

What Lisi is proposing pushes the concept of the "abstract" off the rails . This guy is the Salvador Dali of physics. On LSD.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

8 ай бұрын

*"What Lisi is proposing pushes the concept of the "abstract" off the rails . This guy is the Salvador Dali of physics. On LSD."* ... I'll definitely give him points for imagination. Just like with "string theory," there has to be some additional abstract component added to the mix that magically hooks everything together. Religion did the same thing with "God."

@jonthrelkeld2910

8 ай бұрын

Some religions do employ what amounts to magical abstactions. But Christianity and Judaism do not: God is no abstactiion: He has appeared to and has spoken directly to men: He embodies reality since He created it and the very existence and continuation of the universe depends on Him. I don't expect you to agree, but that's how I see it.@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC That's all theories until proven by experiment, but the difference is there is some mathematics involved.

Trying to follow this geometric explainer for ostensibly all of physics as we know it is breaking my mind. I find Garrett's conviction compelling, but the complexity of this theory violates my sense that the universe just can't be that geometrically complicated and interactive. I note with some disappointment that Garrett was not asked a very simple but CRITICAL question. Does this theory make predictions that are testable??? An unusual failure in an otherwise rock-solid series.

Wow! words elude me. I found this extremely interesting, beautiful and just awesome. I love the way Garrett Lisi explains things. THANK YOU

@turboelephant6298

8 ай бұрын

🤣

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

It's explaining what time is after you abstract it to death.

Sounds coherent but how congruent is it with measured results - after the fact measurement? Theory is wonderful if its coherency matches Nature with fine-tuned congruency. Don't be fooled, however, if coherency and congruency match really well. Ptolemy had a model of the revolution of bodies "around the Earth". His complex theory of cycles and epicycles and "efferents" was accepted till Copernicus and Kepler thought of something "simpler". Don't get me wrong, complexity isn't automatically disqualifying. The assumptions behind the theory: the rules, however, matter. Coherency and congruency do not mean reality. After all no theory of biological digestion can ever "explain" the urge called hunger. There is something more to reality, I think, than coherency and congruency can "dream of". In other words, just as no thought can fill your belly, so no thought can stop time. A donut 🍩 may postpone hunger, just as a clock ⏰️ may be behind time. If you solved time would you also be able to solve eating? According to DC's Flash you wouldn't.

I'm so lost

Animation when lol

He has quite an imagination, I'll give him that. But I think he just wanted to show off his new phone or something.

@yBryan1

8 ай бұрын

Look at the version of iOS that phone is running, I feel like this video was filmed ages ago

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

@@yBryan1 All these are filmed ages ago, in case you didn't realize.

are they in an airplane?

I've encountered this before and it's quite appealing but I still don't get it. If someone were to ask me, I couldn't explain it to them at all. From what I've experienced, once you hit 'lie groups' it seems to go off into the woods. I haven't seen an explanation that works for me yet.

@hakiza-technologyltd.8198

8 ай бұрын

The theory of everything already exists... with enough material evidence.

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

I imagine even if the theory was correct, it would have to involve some concepts that are at the limit of human cognition. You are an ant trying to model reality itself. I don't think we could fully grasp if even if we someday bump into it.

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

The theory of everything is time. Time is everything and everything is time. Time equals energy and energy equals mass times the speed of light squared, no space. Space is human imagination based on science fiction. We experience time through our star the sun. No time no star. No star no planet. No planet no atmosphere. no atmosphere no oxygen. No oxygen, no consciousness. Don’t test nature by holding your breath. Breathe! While breathing read more non-fiction. For example, the dictionary the encyclopedia and the thesaurus. Silly humans! Must be white people. Lack of melanin.

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

@@andreicristian9575 we are humans! Speak for yourself. Humans understand how time works. We experience time through our star the sun. Time is the fabric of the universe. There is no existence without Time. Read more non-fiction. Science rebukes analogies. Science rebukes imagination. time is everything and everything is time. What school did you go to? They did you wrong. You were lied to as a child. We can help you. Read more non-fiction. Simple. Dictionary. Encyclopedia. Thesaurus. Strengthen your dialect. Perfect your semantics. Study linguistics.

BRUH

@kevinsayes

8 ай бұрын

Bruh

Not being a mathematician, I don't fully understand Lisi's connection of Lie groups with time. Lisi seems confident about his ToE, but his overreliance on complexity and abstraction leaves me skeptical. Although my ToE also includes mathematics, it doesn't require a +160 IQ to understand how it works, nor should any all-encompassing explanation surrounding "Existence" do so. The biggest problem with most ToE's is trying to explain the *"Everything"* part solely by way mathematics when that's just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Another problem is trying to attach "time" to something other than what it is (like space, dimensions, and now "Lie groups"). ... Time is simply a "unit of measure" and nothing more, ... and what it measures is "change."

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

Yes, but there is something more to it. Change seems to have a preference when it comes to direction (towards chaos), for the entire Universe, not just me and you. Change also slows down when you observe it moving very fast.

I'm sorry, but this is not even close.

I didnt understand a single sentence.

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

You were not supposed to. That shows you have common sense. What he was saying is unintelligible. The theory of everything it’s time. Time is the energy that connects relativity, gravity, and the quantum. The most obvious example that the pseudo scientist don’t mention is our star the sun. Our star, the sun is the reason for the elements on the periodic table. For example, we are our star. We experience time through our star the sun. The sun, our star is what time looks like in action. Time is the fabric of the universe. When we witness the universe, we are witnessing time. Time is how we experience existence. No time no existence. Pseudoscientists, misconstrue, science and provide misleading information, pseudo scientist provide manipulated data. Time is everything and everything is time. Time produces energy. The universe form through time. There is no beginning without time. The atom is not filled with mostly empty space. The atom is filled with time.

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

Time is not a clock. The matter that is used to make a clock formed through time! Clocks are human instruments used to and accurately measure time. Time is infinite. Time is the fabric of the universe. Space is human imagination based on science fiction. This video is pseudoscience. Fiction. He was not sharing a theory. He was sharing his imagination not even a hypothesis. Embarrassing!

@jedi4049

27 күн бұрын

​@@tyroneallen7857 public a paper on it num nutz

Jeez did not get a one word he said 😂some words. The elementary thing s geometry space has time beyond that if I m right rest places they have a time to. Can’t equation time distance is time that all believe very complex talk sorry

I wonder why this was re-posted after it was disproven in 2010. Distler, J., Garibaldi, S. There is No “Theory of Everything” Inside E8 . Commun. Math. Phys. 298, 419-436 (2010). Still an interesting idea I guess :)

Cool theory - now prove it please...

😂😂😂

Wat

time is an illusion...

@tyroneallen7857

8 ай бұрын

Time is everything. Humans thinking time is an allusion are misinformed or uneducated. Illusions are only possible because of time. No time no illusions. Time produces light and light illuminates illusions so that humans can find clarity. For example, we are our star. We experience time through our star the sun. no illusion! Reality! Time is not a clock. Time is the fabric of the universe. There is no beginning, before or start without time. What is your age? No star no growth. What are you breathing? No star no oxygen. No oxygen, no consciousness. Don’t test nature by holding your breath. Breathe! While breathing read more non-fiction. Dictionary. Encyclopedia. Thesaurus.

WTF

Yeah he can say that rest frame but dose he understands that the rest place have a time too very complicated boy this is too danm to me 😂😂

This is called "over-engineering" - it's rampant in software dev too. I typically prefer a solution that *simplifies* in a straightforward, easily understandable way. Lie groups... circles... he involves far too many abstractions to explain basic ideas like an object rotating. I could rotate 2 of the rows of a Rubik's cube one way, and the other row the opposite way, but that doesn't mean "time is moving forward and backward" lol, there's nothing about that that's the case. That's the problem with casting all this into 3D geometry. There is no objective "arrow of time", space and time are relative to an observer. Even the order of events is different for different observers (example: 2 stars burn out simultaneously, being nearer to 1 or the other makes 1 star burn out before the other because light travels at a constant rate). No 1 vantage point is "correct" or more true than the others. The very concept of order of events is not absolute, it depends on where you are, how fast you're going, etc. Same is true of space, mass, size... how much mass something has directly relates to its speed etc. Special Relativity is essentially an explanation of how speed affects mass, time and space - that's already amazing.

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

I read somewhere that humans at some point in their life can only abstract in terms of their already existing knowledge, and lack the ability to realize it, while vehemently denying it. I'd say it's plausible that if we are to explain everything in the Universe to the smallest degree, we would be able to catch a glimpse of it through mathematics, to intuit it in a way, but not fully grasp it, otherwise we'd have to be all-knowing beings. If the math works for his model, which I'm not sure it does, visualizing it is a matter of subjectivity.

@bennyskim

8 ай бұрын

@@andreicristian9575 Well said. We can't jump to a totally unknown concept, we have to bridge the known with the unknown using analogies. Except maybe in dreams or psychedelia where you can experience a foreign/unknown but it's always so fleeting and you immediately forget, without concepts to cling to. It slips through. Given the nature of the universe, I don't think its entirety can be fully grasped in a single concept - you have to give up some truths to realize others. So anything we say the universe "is", is also "not" from many other perspectives. We can only speak of it in non-precise terms - to have precise terms is to take 1 vantage point or other, some relative frame of reference.

ja like any other good nut he thinks he is right and he is the only one to grasp his ideas...

He’s come up with A Theory of Everything but he’s still bald. That’s the first thing I would fix if I had it all figured out.

@Robinson8491

8 ай бұрын

No way, since Nic Cage has gone bald it is awesome! Rock that look!

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

8 ай бұрын

*"He’s come up with A Theory of Everything but he’s still bald."* ... Now, see? That's already covered in "Multiverse Theory!" In another universe there's a version of him that's a hippie.

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

Agreed, bald people should definitely not come up with theories until they fix their baldness. Then maybe we'll listen to them.