This was quite a nice, charming fugue with a subject that was able to be molded to your rhythms very, very well. I could totally see this being an interlude/sinfonia in an early suite. Well done :)

@averynhiell

Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much! ^^

The orchestration of the tempo is excellent!

@averynhiell

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! ^^

a catchy theme, and a lively rhythm! Well done!

@averynhiell

3 ай бұрын

Thanks a lot! (=

Nice and simple, this could be a good piece for beginner/intermediate learners to play.

@averynhiell

5 ай бұрын

Thank you! (:

Wish i were as talented as you, fugue-wise

Wow! I LIKE this! You've done a nice job of developing that rhythmic motive all the way through. And I like how you snuck in that subject inversion at the end. Neat work! ( I'm gonna go listen to some of your other stuff.)

@averynhiell

10 ай бұрын

Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it! ^^

Ok, you got another subscriber. 🙂

@averynhiell

4 ай бұрын

Thank you, I appreciate it! ^^

awsome! you got a new subscriber

@averynhiell

Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much! :o)

very simple and very fun

@averynhiell

7 ай бұрын

Thank you! ^^

Nice to meet you, Averyn.

@averynhiell

4 ай бұрын

Hi, nice to meet you too! (=

Vau! Haluan kuulla sen! Hieno koostumus!!! Hienoa, tilaan sinut :D

@averynhiell

11 ай бұрын

Kiitoksia oikein paljon! :o)

nice

@averynhiell

4 ай бұрын

Thanks! ^^

Nai❤

sorry if I allow myself to make this observation, but since I studied composition in Florence in Italy I can say that as a counterpoint this fugue is almost perfect but there are two very strange things: the countersubject of the response must be transported identical to the tonic when the tonic takes over third voice and from a rhythmic point of view you cannot use the same model for more than four bars as a fugue rule, then everyone can do it as they want but theoretically the rhythm cannot be percussive but dynamic

@averynhiell

2 ай бұрын

Thank you for your comment! (: I’m sorry, I don’t understand your first point. This fugue does not have a countersubject, every entry of the subject or the answer is accompanied by free counterpoint. Could you elaborate on that? (: As for the rhythmic aspect: I have never heard of such a rule. Of course, this fugue is rhythmically not particularly varied, but I think I have often seen a rhythmic motif being repeated over more than four bars, even in Bach, especially in sequences in episodes (as is the case in this fugue). Can you point me to a source of this claim? I possess some standard treatises on counterpoint.

@E.Vecvec

2 ай бұрын

@@averynhiell I am only reporting the academic notions of the 4-voice fugue. there is a manual by Adler that talks about the escape of the Baroque era. obviously then over the centuries the rules have changed but the countersubject in a fugue is a constitutive element of the structure of the exposure

@averynhiell

2 ай бұрын

@@E.Vecvec It is true that most fugues have a countersubject, but it is not a requirement. Off the top of my head, I can name you three fugues by Bach without a stable countersubject: Contrapunctus I and IX as well as BWV 881.

btw mistä olet kotoisin? Olen kotoisin Filippiineiltä. Nyt olen Suomessa. Minä olen Theos Emmanuel.

@averynhiell

11 ай бұрын

Olen kotoisin Saksasta. (:

...바흐 칠줄알면 피아노 다 칠줄아는거다..

@averynhiell

Ай бұрын

죄송하지만 저는 한국어를 할 줄 모릅니다. 무슨 말씀인지 이해가 안 됩니다. (:

It has no fuga form.

@averynhiell

4 ай бұрын

Which aspects exactly deviate from the fuga form, in your opinion? (:

Fugues in piano sound weird

@averynhiell

4 ай бұрын

You mean, “piano” as in the dynamic or as in the instrument? Either way, I don’t really see your point.

@jackeddemon

4 ай бұрын

@@averynhiell piano forte. Yes, the instrument