The necessity of change. Patterns of change (interaction) manifest as what we call reality.

Thanks. I keep wondering if it would help to think of gravity waves & gravitons as the same thing. Would that just ruin it? tavi.

I like this guy.

Would somebody explain the PHYSICAL difference between INTEGER, DIGIT and PARTICLE.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

3 ай бұрын

*"Would somebody explain the PHYSICAL difference between INTEGER, DIGIT and PARTICLE."* ... Particles are physical representatives of mathematics (numbers). Our periodic table is tantamount to a cosmic abacus.

@mykrahmaan3408

3 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC I specifically emphasized PHYSICAL. And there are 3 words to differentiate. What you have provided is mere word jugglery.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

3 ай бұрын

@@mykrahmaan3408 *"What you have provided is mere word jugglery"* ... What I did was state my view on the physical nature of numbers in the form of particles, which I presumed was your point (and that I was agreeing with you). Obviously, my reply is neither worthy nor welcomed, so I'll leave you to deal with everyone else's replies.

@io3213

3 ай бұрын

Particles are physical objects in space that always follow the same specific physical laws. Numbers and digits are abstract concepts that follow specific mathematical laws. An integer is a quantized number that is typically useful for counting. Digits are integers that are used as symbols for writing integers in the positional numeral notation system.

The great Freeman Dyson.

Meanings are fundamental. Without meanings, it would not be possible to distinguish anything.

@BulentBasaran

3 ай бұрын

We can take that one step further: Awareness (of such meanings, i.e., thoughts, and feelings) is fundamental. The universe is self-aware (or conscious of its evolving self).

Where are those spheres?

Freeman Dyson put the "Fun" in Fundamental. 😂

Quantum fields and space-time.

@idegteke

5 күн бұрын

… and information-intelligence. That is the 3rd (if not the first) one of the 3 obvious fundamental dualities. Neither matter-energy (explained by e.g. quantum fields) nor space-time can create information-intelligence. I’m confident that neither of these three actual fundamental categories of our discoverable reality (which is, of course, necessarily just a subset of EVERITHING) can create each other, while all 3 requires the other 2 in order to exist or gain discoverable manifestation. Thinking that space-time and the quantum fields (or matter-energy continuum) can create any kind of information/intelligence/order (let alone consciousness) which twisted idea is supported by only the religious dogma of “emergence”, is just as intellectually crippling as the many kinds of interest-based holy entities, rainbow energy, flat Earth, spoon bending. Or the philosopher's stone which the mainstream science, one way or another, is vehemently trying to discover ever since the humble beginnings of alchemy, for the sake of fame and fortune and power.

We are the graviton in the spacetime field.

Is the natural, physical world all-there-is? Or is there something more-a supernatural, nonphysical existence? The universe has a MENTAL apparatus. You may call it God , if you like, says Freeman Dyson . : "The public has a distorted view of science because children are taught in school that science is a collection of firmly established truths. Physicist Freeman Dyson

Niels Bohr had the Yin- Yang symbol put on his coat of arms to represent his idea of the Principle of Complementarity. He used the that Principle to explain Wave- Particle duality in quantum physics.

ONE

conciousness is fundamental.conciouness dreaming it self infinity dreams.each dream is an universe.all universe are ( dreams ) connected each other

@kos-mos1127

3 ай бұрын

Consciousness is not fundamental.

@S3RAVA3LM

3 ай бұрын

​@@kos-mos1127 your opinion is quack quack. Your sentiment is quack quack.... reveal your model, system, explication & exposition - if you haven't one, then you haven't a right to opinion. Look at you, Mr ' i dont make claims', therefore 'nobody can prove me wrong', but I'll criticize everbody else. You have made a few claims in the past, however, and they void every opinion you have now until amended.

@kos-mos1127

3 ай бұрын

@@S3RAVA3LM Stating consciousness is fundamental is not a model it’s an assertion. That which can be asserted can be denied without evidence.

@edimbukvarevic90

3 ай бұрын

​@@kos-mos1127There's no evidence without consciousness. At all.

@mktipsfun1564

3 ай бұрын

first of all scientists must prove that brain creat conciousness and conciousness is stuff of chemicals

The Eternal Life, bears all existence, the I', is the Only Real Steady Point, (Center-Reality) the I', (X1) and Consciousness, (X2) is the Cauce-Less Cauce. Rainbow is the Naked picture of X2 Colors pictures the Six Under-Cosmos.(-Circuit) (X3) (Or Eternal Basic-Abilities) We know these abilities from our daily Life, without thinking about it, and it is the very same, that make, the Smart devices work so satisfactory. The Life-desire is the Motor of Life. In direct extension We have Will, Life-side, and Gravity, Stuff-side. (Hunger- and Satisfaction-Principles, is Compass)

how might mathematics develop energy?

@Jipzorowns

3 ай бұрын

what?

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

3 ай бұрын

@@Jipzorowns *"how might mathematics develop energy?"* ... If mathematics is an information-only form of intelligence that predates physical structure, then mathematics could have manifested itself into physical form by generating the energy necessary to calculate it. This would obviously be a one-time (nonrepeatable) event with all energy we currently observe corresponding to the amount of mathematics used to generate it. True, mathematics has infinite possibilities, but mathematics is also a form of "logic." Logic dictates that once you reach a point of informational redundancy, ... then it's time to evolve into something else. You can only do 1 + 1 = 2, 1 + 2 = 3, 1 + 3 = 4, so many times before you reach a point of logical redundancy.

@Jipzorowns

3 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC This doesn't make any sense, sorry.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

3 ай бұрын

*"This doesn't make any sense, sorry."* ... Modern science has already assessed the specific amount of energy required to process a single bit of information: Landauer's principle (10^-21 Joule energy per bit of information). My theory is based on taking every mathematical process that can execute up to the point of redundancy and you end up with the amount of energy we currently observe in the universe. *Example:* Let's say science finally figured out how to establish how many calculations would need to execute before mathematics reached a point of only producing redundant data, and then applied 10^-21 Joule to each of those executions. If that amount of energy closely matched the amount of energy we observe in the universe, then my theory is plausible. It wouldn't explain how the energy was initially created, but it would reveal that the universe emerged from mathematics and that matter and energy owe their existence to logic (mathematics). *Example:* In the 1983 movie "WarGames," the WOPR computer kept cycling through nuclear attach scenarios until it reached a point of redundancy. Then it reached its no-win-scenario conclusion based on that redundancy. Such is the same for the universe (Existence).

@Jipzorowns

3 ай бұрын

@@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Landuer principle, sure, but the rest doesn't make any sense. Instead of rambling on youtube, create it into a paper.

A segment from 'Saved by the Light of the Buddha Within'... My new understandings of what many call 'God -The Holy Spirit' - resulting from some of the extraordinary ongoing after-effects relating to my NDE... Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what some scientists are now referring to as the unified field of consciousnesses. In other words, it’s the essence of all existence and non-existence - the ultimate creative force behind planets, stars, nebulae, people, animals, trees, fish, birds, and all phenomena, manifest or latent. All matter and intelligence are simply waves or ripples manifesting to and from this core source. Consciousness (enlightenment) is itself the actual creator of everything that exists now, ever existed in the past, or will exist in the future - right down to the minutest particles of dust - each being an individual ripple or wave. The big difference between chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo and most other conventional prayers is that instead of depending on a ‘middleman’ to connect us to our state of inner enlightenment, we’re able to do it ourselves. That’s because chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo allows us to tap directly into our enlightened state by way of this self-produced sound vibration. ‘Who or What Is God?’ If we compare the concept of God being a separate entity that is forever watching down on us, to the teachings of Nichiren, it makes more sense to me that the true omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence of what most people perceive to be God, is the fantastic state of enlightenment that exists within each of us. Some say that God is an entity that’s beyond physical matter - I think that the vast amount of information continuously being conveyed via electromagnetic waves in today’s world gives us proof of how an invisible state of God could indeed exist. For example, it’s now widely known that specific data relayed by way of electromagnetic waves has the potential to help bring about extraordinary and powerful effects - including an instant global awareness of something or a mass emotional reaction. It’s also common knowledge that these invisible waves can easily be used to detonate a bomb or to enable NASA to control the movements of a robot as far away as the Moon or Mars - none of which is possible without a receiver to decode the information that’s being transmitted. Without the receiver, the data would remain impotent. In a very similar way, we need to have our own ‘receiver’ switched on so that we can activate a clear and precise understanding of our own life, all other life and what everything else in existence is. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day helps us to achieve this because it allows us to reach the core of our enlightenment and keep it switched on. That’s because Myoho-Renge-Kyo represents the identity of what scientists now refer to as the unified field of consciousnesses. To break it down - Myoho represents the Law of manifestation and latency (Nature) and consists of two alternating states. For example, the state of Myo is where everything in life that’s not obvious to us exists - including our stored memories when we’re not thinking about them - our hidden potential and inner emotions whenever they’re dormant - our desires, our fears, our wisdom, happiness, karma - and more importantly, our enlightenment. The other state, ho, is where everything in Life exists whenever it becomes evident to us, such as when a thought pops up from within our memory - whenever we experience or express our emotions - or whenever a good or bad cause manifests as an effect from our karma. When anything becomes apparent, it merely means that it’s come out of the state of Myo (dormancy/latency) and into a state of ho (manifestation). It’s the difference between consciousness and unconsciousness, being awake or asleep, or knowing and not knowing. The second law - Renge - Ren meaning cause and ge meaning effect, governs and controls the functions of Myoho - these two laws of Myoho and Renge, not only function together simultaneously but also underlies all spiritual and physical existence. The final and third part of the tri-combination - Kyo, is the Law that allows Myoho to integrate with Renge - or vice versa. It’s the great, invisible thread of energy that fuses and connects all Life and matter - as well as the past, present and future. It’s also sometimes termed the Universal Law of Communication - perhaps it could even be compared with the string theory that many scientists now suspect exists. Just as the cells in our body, our thoughts, feelings and everything else is continually fluctuating within us - all that exists in the world around us and beyond is also in a constant state of flux - constantly controlled by these three fundamental laws. In fact, more things are going back and forth between the two states of Myo and ho in a single moment than it would ever be possible to calculate or describe. And it doesn’t matter how big or small, famous or trivial anything or anyone may appear to be, everything that’s ever existed in the past, exists now or will exist in the future, exists only because of the workings of the Laws ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ - the basis of the four fundamental forces, and if they didn’t function, neither we nor anything else could go on existing. That’s because all forms of existence, including the seasons, day, night, birth, death and so on, are moving forward in an ongoing flow of continuation - rhythmically reverting back and forth between the two fundamental states of Myo and ho in absolute accordance with Renge - and by way of Kyo. Even stars are dying and being reborn under the workings of what the combination ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’ represents. Nam, or Namu - which mean the same thing, are vibrational passwords or keys that allow us to reach deep into our life and fuse with or become one with ‘Myoho-Renge-Kyo’. On a more personal level, nothing ever happens by chance or coincidence, it’s the causes that we’ve made in our past, or are presently making, that determine how these laws function uniquely in each of our lives - as well as the environment from moment to moment. By facing east, in harmony with the direction that the Earth is spinning, and chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo for a minimum of, let’s say, ten minutes daily to start with, any of us can experience actual proof of its positive effects in our lives - even if it only makes us feel good on the inside, there will be a definite positive effect. That’s because we’re able to pierce through the thickest layers of our karma and activate our inherent Buddha Nature (our enlightened state). By so doing, we’re then able to bring forth the wisdom and good fortune that we need to challenge, overcome and change our adverse circumstances - turn them into positive ones - or manifest and gain even greater fulfilment in our daily lives from our accumulated good karma. This also allows us to bring forth the wisdom that can free us from the ignorance and stupidity that’s preventing us from accepting and being proud of the person that we indeed are - regardless of our race, colour, gender or sexuality. We’re also able to see and understand our circumstances and the environment far more clearly, as well as attract and connect with any needed external beneficial forces and situations. As I’ve already mentioned, everything is subject to the law of Cause and Effect - the ‘actual-proof-strength’ resulting from chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo always depends on our determination, sincerity and dedication. For example, the levels of difference could be compared to making a sound on a piano, creating a melody, producing a great song, and so on. Something else that’s very important to always respect and acknowledge is that the Law (or if you prefer God) is in everyone and everything. NB: There are frightening and disturbing sounds, and there are tranquil and relaxing sounds. It’s the emotional result of any noise or sound that can trigger off a mood or even instantly change one. When chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo each day, we are producing a sound vibration that’s the password to our true inner-self - this soon becomes apparent when you start reassessing your views on various things - such as your fears and desires etc. The best way to get the desired result when chanting is not to view things conventionally - rather than reaching out to an external source, we need to reach into our own lives and bring our needs and desires to fruition from within - including the good fortune and strength to achieve any help that we may need. Chanting Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo also reaches out externally and draws us towards, or draws towards us, what we need to make us happy from our environment. For example, it helps us to be in the right place at the right time - to make better choices and decisions and so forth. We need to think of it as a seed within us that we’re watering and bringing sunshine to for it to grow, blossom and bring forth fruit or flowers. It’s also important to understand that everything we need in life, including the answer to every question and the potential to achieve every dream, already exists within us.

))

1:52 FD: ... the most beautiful things I've done actually are pure mathematics which have nothing to do with physics I mean I discovered a beautiful theorem concerning sequences of integers which only about three people in the world ever understood or were interested in but it just is unutterably beautiful mathematics is full of gems like that and physics is too another things I did was a subject called random matrices which I did 45 years ago and the reason that it was supposed to be interesting was that Eugene Vigner ... 2:38 ... 9:06 ... now there's a new generation everybody's talking about quantum gravity and unifying these apparently disparate areas of general relativity which deals with the whole universe and quantum mechanics which deals with subatomic particles and everybody says that these have to be unified you said that maybe the inconsistency is something that is not so terrible 9:28 FD: right ... the question is which I'm raising which is supposed the gravity exists is there any way we could tell is there is there in princile any way we could detect a single graviton I mean we know we can detect classical gravitational waves there's a big machine called Ligo which has been built just to do that but of course Ligo is far too insensitive to detect a single graviton and so so the beautiful thing is that if you tried to design a Ligo apparatus for detecting a single graviton you have to have two mirrors in which the light travels back and forth and as the graviton comes by the space time is distorted a bit so the distance between the two mirriors changes very very slightly 10:42 and if you look at the way that the laws of quantum mechanics constrain the movements of the mirrors that you can't actually constrain the mirrors very closely unless they're extremely heavy and if yo ucalculate if you have a single graviton precisely how heavy the mirrors have to be it turns out they're precisely as heavy as would mean that they collapse into a black hole so nature in fact destroys the experiment before it can be completed so I find that sort of nice it's a it's a nature sets the limits to what you can do and that's of course a style of argument that was the master of and Neil SP at the beginning of mechanics love to do that kind of an argument so I'm very happy to find it still alive and well 11:35 ... there really are two worlds there's the classical world in the quantum world and that they are separate but they both exist they're both real so it's a sort of a duual view dualist view of of of of nature and that was B's gospel that that's how he understood quantum mechanics quantum mechanics does not explain everything you have to have a classical world as well the quantum theory deals with the future and classical world deals with the past so what I'm saying is that this is still true it's no longer fashionable nowadays all the young people think everything has to be quanutized but I like to go back to B

Consciousness and PURE LOVE is fundamental

@S3RAVA3LM

3 ай бұрын

Task: find out the sanskrit word that was rendered in english as consciousness. Cit; Greek= Nous/mind.

@Resmith18SR

3 ай бұрын

Your insanity is Fundamental.

Healthy contempt of the big egos who came before 😅

Is Pluto a planet or a minor planet? Ans: It doesn't matter to Pluto! It is what it is and our definition doesn't change that. Same with "fundamental."

@thejimmymeister

3 ай бұрын

"Fundamental" isn't a merely taxonomical term like "planet" and "minor planet" are. The latter two depend on convention; the former depends on real relations between things. We can't just decide that the subject of sociology is more fundamental than that of particle physics because, no matter our conventions, society simply would not exist if there weren't any physical particles. Fundamentality is a real property with explanatory and instrumental implications.

@infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836

3 ай бұрын

​@@thejimmymeister You'll notice that the brilliant Freeman Dyson's very first words were "I hate the word 'fundamental'" and later, "I don't give a damn whether it's fundamental or not." _That's a hint._ 😀 But let me ask you this: *Are atoms fundamental?*

@thejimmymeister

3 ай бұрын

@infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836 That's a hint that he doesn't care about fundamentality, not that it doesn't matter. Regardless of his attitudes towards it, fundamentality is not the same as the planet vs. dwarf planet question. I think that atoms are not ultimately fundamental. I think that they are more fundamental than chemicals but less fundamental than quarks.

@infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836

3 ай бұрын

@@thejimmymeister Dyson dismisses the question because he isn't interested in discussing semantics and that's the point of the Pluto analogy. OBVIOUSLY larger things are made of smaller things and some things appeared before others. But once you place them on your "continuum of fundamentality," what have you achieved?

(1:50) *FD: **_"I'm a mathematician, so my tools are essentially calculations and the most beautiful things I've done actually are pure mathematics"_* ... And even though Freeman is not interested in whatever physics has deemed _"the most fundamental,"_ his most _beautiful things_ are coincidentally the most fundamental structure in existence: *Information* (primarily logic / mathematics). *Pure Information* is as low as you can go on the existential ladder as nothing is found below it. The existential order of ascension starts with logical information followed by virtual structure, then basic physical structure, then complex physical structure, then simple living structure, then complex living structure, then consciousness, and then self-aware consciousness. ... We currently exist at the tail end of this 13.8-billion-year evolution of information.

@simonhibbs887

3 ай бұрын

Yet everything we know about information is in terms of physical systems. That's why we can have an information technology, and engineer information processing systems, because it's a property of the physical. If you change the physical, you change the information. There is no observed phenomenon of information independent of the physical, or pure information as you put it. This applies to mathematics as well, mathematical expressions are physical, calculating a result is a physical process, so both mathematics and information are emergent properties that depend on the physical. I know 'mathematical truths' are often held to be somehow more fundamental because they are true in a sense independent of their physical expression. I think this is wrong. The fact that they can be expressed, and evaluated, and that their calculations can be performed and produce the results that they do is due to the properties of the physical. After all if the properties of the physical did not enable the expression of those mathematical constructs, and if physical processes did not proceed to produce those results when mathematical expressions are computed, where would mathematics be then? What is a story that is never written, or that is unwritable? What is a calculation that is never expressed, or a result that is not, or never can be computed?

@grijzekijker

3 ай бұрын

I love how you structure things, it makes sense. Do you expect that the existential order of complex living structure has manifested itself on complex physical structure all over the cosmos? Isn't science in agreement that images from James Webb Telescope show 13.8 billion years is way too young for all these redshift galaxies to have formed?

@simonhibbs887

3 ай бұрын

@kijker The JWST shows us that galaxies formed more rapidly than we expected. Our old models of galaxy formation were very speculative, because it's not something we observe happening in the universe today. We hoped the JWST would give us a lot more data on the structure and formation of early galaxies, and it did just that. As a result we now have much better models for early galaxy formation that are consistent with this new evidence. Other evidence from the JWST confirmed previous estimates for the age of the universe, aside from some improvements in their accuracy. It was the models of galaxy formation that were wrong, not the estimate of the age of the universe.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

3 ай бұрын

​@@grijzekijker *"I love how you structure things, it makes sense."* ... Thank you. Unlike with the many convoluted theories modern science is handing us, reality should "make sense." *"Do you expect that the existential order of complex living structure has manifested itself on complex physical structure all over the cosmos?"* ... Whenever structure of any type ends up producing redundant data, "Existence" will evolve that structure into something else that can produce new data. We observe this happening everywhere and even in human society. It's a process, so wherever suitable conditions arise (such as a planet steeped in complex structure that's just sitting idle) ... life will emerge. *"Isn't science in agreement that images from James Webb Telescope show 13.8 billion years is way too young for all these redshift galaxies to have formed?"* ... For me, it doesn't matter if it's 13.8 or 23.8 billion years; ... the evolution from simplicity to complexity still applies. Where this clearly observable process that every one of us demonstrates throughout our own biological developments _doesn't apply_ is to fantastic, unfalsifiable theories such as Multiverse and Many Worlds.

@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC

3 ай бұрын

*"Yet everything we know about information is in terms of physical systems. That's why we can have an information technology, and engineer information processing systems, because it's a property of the physical."* ... "Know" being the operative word. "knowing" something is a nonphysical property. Knowledge is raw information that you can't shove into a test tube. Rocks don't know things, but "I" do. *"This applies to mathematics as well, mathematical expressions are physical, calculating a result is a physical process, so both mathematics and information are emergent properties that depend on the physical."* ... Mathematics is not a physical structure. Mathematics is a nonphysical structure (logic) that exists without the presence of any physical structure. *Example:* 1 (of something) + 1 (of something) = 2 (of something). That "something" might be physical (like a rock) or something nonphysical (like an imaginary magic elf). Doesn't matter! The equation exists all on its own. You know this to be true because we can both calculate it and come up with the exact same results despite no physical structure being involved. Mathematics is not dependent on anything. It exists all on its own while waiting for something physical to come along in order to demonstrate how it works. You don't have "something" first, and then mathematics suddenly emerges to count, divide, or multiply it. ... It's the other way around. *"What is a story that is never written"* ... A potential story that's still locked in the information-only stage. (that's in my book, by the way). *"What is a calculation that is never expressed"* ... A potential formula stuck in the information-only stage. *"or a result that is not, or never can be computed?"* ... That's a non sequitur. If you have a result, then it's already been calculated.

The most fundamental thing about the Cosmos is that it is big. You thought going to the shops was a long journey ! Plus, it is full of fields, such as the gravitation and Higgs fields.

Thank y'all May y'all's Journey Be Better Blessed... Up LOVE ☝️🌎🌍🌏💗 B🌞 B.R.A.T.😇 Bryan Robert August Thul👻 ONELOVE The TRINITY∆ SOURCE🫶EVERMORE

Ah, Freeman, it’s too bad you’re dead… Ironically, your objection to measuring individual gravitons, I.e. that the required mass of the “mirrors” in the measuring device would make the mirrors black holes, suggests a solution to your problem: use black holes to do the studies. One would expect the highest energy gravitons, I.e. the shortest wavelength gravitons, near event horizons. Since photons couple to (putative) gravitons, discrete accelerations of the photons would be expected for photons on near-event-horizon trajectories. The same would be true for small test masses, but these might be much more difficult to measure. One barrier to making such measurements would be all the mass and activity that typically surrounds black holes. Material near black holes would (dramatically) interfere with the photon acceleration measurements. There are many other confounding issues, but experiments might be possible, at least in principle.

Made me think if the universe as a whole becomes so heavy will it collapse into a black hole

@haroldfloyd5518

3 ай бұрын

No.

He takes too much credit. If there are no discoveries or no fundamental ideas, there is nothing to clean up. The creativity lies in the discoveries and in the ideas, not in the so-called “cleaning it up.”

@BulentBasaran

3 ай бұрын

Clean-up is also creative when done well: it causes entropy to go down!

@ALavin-en1kr

3 ай бұрын

You have a point there.

@melgross

3 ай бұрын

He did more than just “clean up”. His reputation doesn’t come from him cleaning up. But there are many problems in theories that need to be “cleaned up”, or the theory is worthless.

Nothing

From a law of non-contradiction : anything which is not itself is excluded, compliant perspective, apriori numeric syntax sequence zero one two is beautiful, but non-numeric syntax sequence negativeone, zero, two is not, since negative is not numeric syntax.

Mr. Freeman Dyson calcules gravity though mirrors It is NOT Sense when in Quantum mechanics particles are unpredictable . On other words in quantum mechanics particles existence is nil. He model It is NOT consistency with fundamental Law of quantum.

1:06 This man is one of my heroes. It is ever most wonderful if anger arises when, and such is a divine impulse, persons in a sly way interpolate their agenda of bias and sentiments into the information cultivated by the tools of science. Any man who claims to be doing science is equivalent to a carpenter claiming to be doing hammer. If any such man claims to be doing science and comes not to a unified realization of the whole and acknowledgement of this Divine power shining forth & through all things, haven't a pure aspiration and child like curiosity, a divine mania of such an insatiable thirst for Wisdom and touching That which is omnipresent,.. they may be using science, and should be seperated from.

@simonhibbs887

3 ай бұрын

>"Science is about tools rather than concepts." He's talking about the difference between scientific realism and empirical antirealism. For him science is about predictive mathematical descriptions we can use practically, rather than 'cosmic truths' and such. I agree, science can't give us the answers to truly philosophical questions, which is why I am also an empiricist. He is a christian though, so there's that.

@S3RAVA3LM

3 ай бұрын

​@@simonhibbs887 quack quack.. shut up Simon you clown

Science and religion are two windows that people look through, trying to understand the big universe outside, trying to understand why we are here. The two windows give different views, but they look out at the same universe. Both views are one-sided, neither is complete. Both leave out essential features of the real world. And both are worthy of respect. Trouble arises when either science or religion claims universal jurisdiction, when either religious or scientific dogma claims to be infallible. Religious creationists and scientific materialists are equally dogmatic and insensitive. By their arrogance they bring both science and religion into disrepute. The media exaggerate their numbers and importance. The media rarely mention the fact that the great majority of religious people belong to moderate denominations that treat science with respect, or the fact that the great majority of scientists treat religion with respect so long as religion does not claim jurisdiction over scientific questions. Physicist Freeman Dyson.

God, you can stop searching LOL

🙏OLDIES HATE FUNDAMENTALS AS THEY ARE ABOUT TO LEAVE AND DONT WANT TO STRUGGLE IN SOME OTHER UNDERSTANDING AS THEY KNOW THEIR BUCKET OF OLD GELLY IS FULL TO GRAB SOME THING NEW ABOUT REALITY , LOVE ALL OLDI BY GOLDY💔

Hahahahaha... for a mathematician he self-contradicts too much.

I have no use for a theology that claims to know the answers to deep questions but bases its arguments on the beliefs of a single tribe. I am a practicing Christian but not a believing Christian. To me, to worship God means to recognize that mind and intelligence are woven into the fabric of our universe in a way that altogether surpasses our comprehension. "God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension." Dyson 2002a . Mind, God , Religion part 2 Freeman Dyson . "God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension."