The Universe will end when it can no longer contain all of Simon's channels

@justinsadowski9823

11 ай бұрын

Next week Simon is gonna drop a new video on how to cook Carolina BBQ short ribs in a Crock Pot

@W1LDTANG

11 ай бұрын

@@justinsadowski9823 Yo, I'm bout to get mine started in the crockpot, in just a few hours... Seen this reply, and 🤔.... Lmao. Thought it was something though seeing your reply, as it was really unexpected, and random (yes I know that was the whole point, but still...), and kinda crazy being I've been planning on cooking some myself for a few days now. Anyway, *_🍻🍻🍻Cheers🍻🍻🍻_* mate! *_🇺🇸🐍🇺🇸_*

@drewishaf

11 ай бұрын

Simon is actually the AI's interface to humans. It wants us not to fear, so it made a quirky Brit that nobody questions how he gets 68 hours of content made per day, every day...

@JelleTheTunes

11 ай бұрын

Not when, if

@tommyrotton9468

11 ай бұрын

your universe has suffered a 404 error

Dear Simon, we absolutely adore space themes on sideprojects. The last few months have been full of them and its been a blast! Keep them coming, please

@F_L_U_X

11 ай бұрын

Agreed

@beethimbles8801

11 ай бұрын

Me too ✋

@swiftycortex

11 ай бұрын

Yes more please. Thank uou

@darlenefraser3022

11 ай бұрын

Same here! This is awesome!

@infernotyphoon

11 ай бұрын

Agreed

There is a theory which says if anyone ever figures out the universe it will instantly be replaced by something even more unfathomable. There is another theory that says this has already happened. - Douglas Adams, Hitchhikers Guide to the Universe

@DrDeuteron

11 ай бұрын

nerd!

@dallesamllhals9161

11 ай бұрын

42

@ChurchNietzsche

11 ай бұрын

Universe? ... are you sure?

@hrma6313

11 ай бұрын

And it's the Gib Gnab, not some stupid crunch

@charlesjenkins7130

10 ай бұрын

You think it's a long way to the chemist....

It’s also a popular theory that the supermassives were what is called a direct collapse black hole. Matter was so dense in the beginning that certain objects simply collapsed into black holes before even becoming stars.

@omega311888

11 ай бұрын

ive heard that one as well

@QBCPerdition

11 ай бұрын

That's where I, as a lay person, place my bets.

@ancientcolors

11 ай бұрын

I like the concept of black hole stars as an explanation, kurzgesagt did a video about it

@benvaun1330

11 ай бұрын

hypothesis. not theory.

@hoonaticbloggs5402

11 ай бұрын

@@benvaun1330 You mean like even the existence of black holes? Ever been to one ?

The Great Attractor was discovered to likely be the Vela Supercluster, discovered in 2016 and of sufficient mass to explain the Great Attractor.

@Ski_3_p_o

11 ай бұрын

Just sucks it happens to reside in the zone of avoidance so we can’t know for sure.

@niftybass

11 ай бұрын

​@@Ski_3_p_oOver the last few years, scientists (astronomers) have become a lot better at being able to see thru it .

@ChurchNietzsche

11 ай бұрын

I heard The Great Attractor caused the 1977 NYC blackout, with Earth's first SUPERBALL

@dianapennepacker6854

11 ай бұрын

No no No! That is a cover up theory. It is a galactic monster or being swallowing all mass! Or a civilization trying to fight against heat death!!! Don't let them fool you there allliiiieeeeennns now and the federal government is going after the rogue elements or black projects covering up as I speak!!!

@kingyoung5228

10 ай бұрын

It's the Laniakea Supercluster which is in turn being pulled by the shapely cluster this cluster being so massive that it exerts a gravitational pull on everything in our region of space every galaxy is moving towards this location

I love how the universe is a side project

@DrDeuteron

11 ай бұрын

yeah, for God

@scottbishop7899

11 ай бұрын

Just need Simon to expand on this so it makes the grade of becoming a Megaproject 😆 🤣 😂

in an infinite universe, with no beginning and no end, there's also no end to your kickass videos. informative and mind-expanding. thanks for the effort!

@ThatWriterKevin

11 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed!

@samuelbraziel6267

5 ай бұрын

​@ThatWriterKevin Kevin when did simon let you out of the basement😂

@HBrooks

5 ай бұрын

lol.. i broke out. :P@@samuelbraziel6267

I love how SMBH sounds like it was named by a child ❤

@julianaylor4351

11 ай бұрын

It was in the toy box. 😁

@ThatWriterKevin

11 ай бұрын

A LOT of science terms sound that way, like spaghetification or weekly interactive particles called WIMPs

@omega311888

11 ай бұрын

@@ThatWriterKevin spaghetification just makes me hungry for pasta 😁

@ThatWriterKevin

11 ай бұрын

@@omega311888 It is one of the greatest scientific terms ever

Thanks Simon, for everything I didn't know, for everything i'm yet to learn. It's great to hear a presenter who is not over dramatic on these subjects. You do a great job.

Cool video this.. fascinating! The 2D into 3D just feels right for some reason! .. the joint I just smoked probably helped though..

my probably wrong theory on the 'great attractor' is it could possibly be a new class of SMBH, but galactic in scale. if it was as large as this, it would be harder for an accretion disc to form with enough density to give the usual radiation signatures we see on other black holes. maybe. i dont know

@user-kw6uh2ki4m

11 ай бұрын

that might tie nicely into the whole "dark energy IS black holes and black holes have vacuum energy" theory.

Thank you for putting time and effort into this. It boggles my mind and you help un-boggle it a bit.

I like the idea that some of the supermassive black holes were actually formed from "shrapnel" from the big bang. That when the singularity "exploded" it did not do so evenly and some chunks were left that were still dense enough to remain as mini-singularities.

@kingyoung5228

10 ай бұрын

Singularities don't exist

@alipetuniashow

10 ай бұрын

@@kingyoung5228they do

Simon Et Al will you please sort your sound levels out, I almost just blew my speakers out. Across your channels the levels are never the same. P.S. love your work ;)

Love your new studio lighting. I have a tv from 2003 I'll never replace even when it goes out that gets burn pretty bad from that bright pink light that will stay for hours and then go away. This is much better.

ery impressed with this video. I have always been interested in astronomy and physics. It was things like this that drove me to enter those professions. Thank you for feeding my insatiable curiosity about the universe and the wonders that we discove

0:35 - Chapter 1 - Supermassive black holes may predate the big bang 3:25 - Chapter 2 - The great attractor 6:45 - Chapter 3 - White holes 9:40 - Chapter 4 - The holographic universe

7:50 Had me in stitches 🤘👊🤌🤣🤣🤣

The JWST has discovered a very early galaxy that is only 50 light years in diameter yet is producing stars at a rate similar to what our Milkyway is doing today. Galaxies like this could be the source of super-massive back holes.

@hoonaticbloggs5402

11 ай бұрын

Early? Our human concept of time has no place in the universe. Our ways of measuring the universe are inadequate

The most amazing explanation of the timeline of our planet I have ever seen.

As far as the great attractor goes we'll only have to wait 50 or so million years until we're on the other side of the galaxy and we'll get our 1st look. So, hopefully Simon will be ready to give us an update then

The Big Ceunch went away after we proved the universe was expanding at an accelerated rate

@zna9297

11 ай бұрын

yeah theres a lot of really outdated or over-simplified stuff here

@DrDeuteron

11 ай бұрын

but why? Maybe it will turn around?

White Hole: one of my favorite Red Dwarf episodes!

@sheparian9981

11 ай бұрын

Kryten:Long explonation about white holes. Cat:So,what is it?

@speckledjim_

11 ай бұрын

​@@sheparian9981 Kryten - another long explanation about white holes. Cat - So what is it?

Fascinating presentation. My personal take is that the sphere is the most plausible shape of the universe, and that there is a massive proportion not detectable. The universe is likened to earth in that matter migrates like tectonic plates across the medium, even ending (or beginning) by colliding in unimaginable explosions on the other side of this universal sphere. I imagined the image of galaxies at the distant limits were like the sun setting or rising and an optical illusion produces a larger object. Could these galaxies be disappearing over the horizon of a spherical universe giving the same impression? At first it seems the universe is flat due to the incredible distances involved. Maybe we haven't even seen the half of creation.

That was a roller coaster. As I‘m watching quite a lot of physics and cosmology channels, there were quite a few things that I never heard of, e.g. that the Great Attractor is directly opposite our massive black hole and could be the center of the big crunch, if any. Very interesting. Would this be compatible with the cycling universe (CCC)?

@aaronperelmuter8433

7 ай бұрын

It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with CCC, conformal cyclic cosmology, and CCC has absolutely nothing to do with the Big Crunch. The whole point of CCC is that it’s conformal, hence there is no crunch or compression phase, going from one universe/aeon to the next is just a conformal transform, no compactification or crunch necessary. That’s not to say it isn’t a wildly speculative, and wildly lacking in ANY kind of evidence for its existence. If just about anyone other than Penrose had come up with it, I’m pretty sure no one would ever have given it the time of day, it’d be shut down the first time someone read it. Regarding the Great Attractor, it isn’t directly opposite Sag A*, our smbh. It’s completely obscured from view by the main disc and bulge of the milky way, that’s all. Moreover, it too, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with anything at all regarding the big crunch. Simon has NO clue what he’s talking about! If the crunch was ever to occur, by definition, just as happens in a bh, everything gets compressed towards a single point, it isn’t possible that any matter of any definition could possibly, somehow, magically miss out on the compression which is affecting literally the ENTIRE UNIVERSE except for some random bits which just happen to hold off the force of the entire universe collapsing in on itself. Like, sure, that sound realistic, right? Like I said, Simon has no idea WTF he’s even talking about. It’s SO far from being even a fringe theory it’s laughable he even mentioned it. Anyway, the Great Attractor has been known about for around 40kph years, I think, and there’s nothing mysterious about it, nothing strange or any kind of unknown physics. A woman almost got a Nobel prize a few years ago for her research into the Great Attractor, and trust me, they do NOT award Nobel prizes for anything remotely up in the air or unproven. That’s exactly why people don’t receive their prizes until 20 or so years after their discovery/work/etc, to be (reasonably) sure that the physics is on solid ground.

All I can hear is Professor Farnsworth: “All the zones have names like that in the Galaxy of Terror.”

@Mirthandirxiii

Ай бұрын

Good news!

Personally, I think the Fuzzball concept of Black Holes makes more sense. To me, at least. Instead of being a hole at all, it’s a place in spacetime like the holographic universe you explained, the outer area of the sphere is the only part that matters, there is no other side or inside. It’s densely packed quantum foam made of spacetime effectively having its information (e.g; it’s energy) siphoned off back into our universe, which we can see in Hawking Radiation. That’s a massive simplification, but maybe it’s another side project video?

My small brain is having trouble fitting this all in 😂 But immensely interesting and humbling to know there are big brains that can actually understand and research this stuff

@cookiemonster2299

11 ай бұрын

I've always liked the idea that because everything in the universe is made from the same stuff then humans are the universe observing and trying to understand itself. 🤷🙂👍

To me, the coolest thing about the universe is that it seems we know everything and absolutely nothing about it - at the same time. Take SMBHs possibly being older than the big bang due to a "cyclic" universe expanding and then contracting. As of now, no one can say for sure if that is even possible given theories like the big RIP. Dark energy overtook the force of gravity millions of years ago as the strongest spacial influence in the universe kinda eliminating the potential of the big CRUNCH due to expansion (ie, the universe is ~14.5B years old but its diameter is ~90B light years). Everything and nothing at the same time. Fascinating, Captain. Cheers....

@fordid42

8 ай бұрын

May not even need a Big Crunch to start a new universe. Just a quantum fluctuation down the road a little bit (10^10^10^76 years, decades, seconds... doesn't matter with a number that huge). Could take into consideration the leftover particles from heat death and expansion. Maybe, I could be talking out of my behind.

Ahhh Simon, the bespectacled bearded font of interesting information, love your work

This is incredibly fascinating.

Can we get more of these? I for one really enjoy these

This feels more like a 'Science Unbound' episode. Happy im subbed to all your channels so i dont miss out during moments like this 👍

@ThatWriterKevin

11 ай бұрын

There is definitely overlap sometimes, but this stuff seems to do really well on this channel. Maybe I'll have to write the next one over there!

@Unalochy

11 ай бұрын

@ThatWriterKevin Kevin, it is an absolute honor and a pleasure! The Deepest Internet Mysteries video series on the Decoding The Unknown channel has become the go-to vids that I've pulled up and watched with friends multiple times when things seem to calm and start to drag on during get-togethers. I would like to directly thank you for the immense fun your writing has brought. Your writing is so on point that I have had some friends rewatch videos they saw months earlier at a separate gathering get excited and help drive the interest, and they still don't get the stories correctly the second time because of your bravado and skill interweaving crazy real stories with similarly crazy fiction (with amazing nerd references) 🖤 As a viewer, I do what I can to appease the youtube algorithm gods, likes, comments, and even frequent shares. With all that, though, I know my overall impact is diminutive at best. Alas, it is the only means at which I can consistently show my appreciation for the works that you present us. So, in this random chance moment that I feel I have been placed in, I would like to thank you personally for the many happy and literally cherished memories I have that would not have taken place without your influence. Video's you've written have been viewed across the world, but in my little house on my short street, you are known by name and writing talent alone. But we know your name, Kevin, and even though we will never meet, we will remember you.

@ThatWriterKevin

11 ай бұрын

@@Unalochy Thank you, that's extremely kind!

The fact the black holes can predate the big bang is mind blowing because that means the universe is so much older that we thought which makes me feel even smaller than before which is also beautiful.

@contumelious-8440

10 ай бұрын

I have always been a fan of the cyclic universe theory. Somehow, knowing that all the Universe would someday contract into a point and explode into a new Universe was comforting. Matter that was outside the big bang feels like confirmation.

@newagain9964

10 ай бұрын

It’s nonsense.

Afaik, the first hypothesis presented is related to Conformal Cyclic Cosmology a hypothesis presented by Roger Penrose. According to Penrose you should he able to see evidence of the "previous universe" through the detection of Hawking points in the CMB. Those points would be afterglow left by the evaporation of said black holes. Nothing he says would indicate the survival of a black hole through the aeon. In fact it would be impossible according to his hypothesis because for CCC to work there must be 0 mass left in the entire universe in order for the rescaling to occur

Relativity actually works on all things bigger than subatomic particles. It makes more sense to say that quantum mechanics is the science of the very small and relativity is the science of everything else.

@DrDeuteron

11 ай бұрын

which relativity? Special realtitivty + QM = quantum field theory, the most successful scientific theory ever. General R + QM = garbage out.

Every single black hole animation on the Internet always shows the accretion disk spinning way, way, WAY too slowly around the event horizon. This is matter spinning at insane speeds, being ripped apart by insane tidal forces, generating X-ray radiation just as it's about to fall inward.

Im fairly new to this kind of stuff, but if there are such things as both black and theoretical white holes, and they're supposed to work opposite of each other, could it be possible that a black hole could absorb more than its maximum, become a white hole, and end up expelling everything due to momentum, opposing magnetic forces, etc?

@Ski_3_p_o

11 ай бұрын

Short answer, no. Long answer, black holes eventually evaporate via hawking radiation, no matter how big they are. But this isn’t what a whit whole would be, a white hole would be a raging waterfall more or less. If you kept adding matter to a black hole it would increase its mass and thus is gravity would make it last longer.

@ChurchNietzsche

11 ай бұрын

@ericmiesieski3165 A "White Hole" is a miniature big bang ... some think they are gateways from other Universes.

@Wooargh

11 ай бұрын

white holes are racist

@David_Baxendale

11 ай бұрын

"A white hole, but what is it?" (Said by a cat on a spaceship - if you know, you know) 🙂

@semaj_5022

11 ай бұрын

Expanding on the previous reply, as far as we can tell, there isn't really a "maximum" amount of matter and/or energy that a black hole could take in. Everything that falls into a black hole simply becomes more black hole, its mass/energy adding to the black hole's mass. Just speculating, but I thinknif a black hole were to have a maximum intake, it would probably be equivalent to or just slightly less than it's own mass, yet even then you'd end up with a collision instead of "absorbtion," and the end result would be a doubly massive black hole.

I guess I’ve been watching too many videos to be sure, but is this a re-upload or have I just seen all this in other videos?

I think that Super Massive Black Holes cause the big bang. When enough of them combine, bam and you have another big bang. What has not been sucked up in the super, super massive black hole just gets blown outside of the new universe.

Dear Simon, in your first sentence you said that a black hole has infinite density. According to PBS Space Time that's not necessarily true. The black in the center of the Milky Way has the density of liquid water for example.

Love these videos, reminds me about how much we don't know.

It wasn't until Susskind tried explaining the holographic theory using string theory that it piqued my interest. It took me a few years to get my head around it. Now combine that with the fact that it's most certainly incomplete and possibly wrong. You start to understand the daunting task of unification.

interesting theory! MBH's predating the current BigBang cycle, matter all draws together, maybe some black holes lag behind not all drawn in before another BB happens, they get more lifetimes and stars to eat and become massive black holes

9:59 into the video about different scales behaving differently while may seem " unsatisfactory " is still true . The quantum sub-atomic particles Builds the macro particles such as the periodic table of elements and Galactic cores , and planets and moons etc .

Once again, my mind is completely blown by these videos...🎉

Heard the background music somewhere before? What is this from? Or like?

Bring on the existential dread Simon

Sometimes i really need this break from Casual Criminalist to hear some theory of the universe to clense the pallet from all the murder and awfulness.... that I will surely go back to soon....

@ThatWriterKevin

11 ай бұрын

Glad I could help!

If the bit of information was written at the Planck length an not something as massive as a atom? The Verse has such an incredible resolution.

first read "cosmic mind blenders" which I guess would be more a subject for "Into the Shadows" or "Decoding the Unknown"

If the center of black holes are a singularity where time stops and the big bang was also a singularity where time began...is there another Universe on the other side of black holes? Edit: nvm. You touched on this later in the video.

@u_t2347

11 ай бұрын

I've often thought about this. There is theoretical "stupendously large black holes" that exceed a trillion solar masses. Perhaps, once they get that big they go bang once again, whether it be in our dimension or another. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If such a black hole was in another 'verse and it reached our 'verse what would that even look like?

@scottbishop7899

11 ай бұрын

The energy could come back into this universe but in a different space and time altogether, that could be the past or the future as the black hole defies/breaks space and time (ad we know it)

@josephriley4356

11 ай бұрын

That's funny, I always do that too.

@Psykout

11 ай бұрын

I've often pondered about this. Given that spacetime is so heavily warped, that other universe would essentially be at the end of our time. If you subscribe to the idea of the big crunch, that universe on the other side of the black hole essentially would contain all the matter of our entire universe. This fits in with the cyclical theories pretty neatly, although it would mean that black holes if ever traversable, would be one way tickets to a new universe paid for by the end of the universe you were leaving. I'd much rather have them be a way to travel between galaxies considering the are the center of them.

@dianapennepacker6854

11 ай бұрын

Maybe they are the key to creating energy. I don't buy that energy cannot be created or destroyed and only transformed. That all energy that ever existed is it. Seriously it is depressing if heat death is the end of the universe.

No mention of Hawking radiation? Plenty of recent research and discussion over implications for SMBHs and such

Theoretically speaking, could it be plausible that black holes are entrances to basically a worm hole and white holes are the exits 🤔 maybe in the future we can test that theory, if it is plausible maybe it could be also used for future space travel if deemed safe

What if galaxies are galactic-sized planetary nebula?i.e remnants of supermassive stars that exploded and turned into supermassive blackholes shortly after the big bang?

More STEM topics please and thank you

Every time you said Supermassive Black Hole, I couldn't help but think of the song my Muse

what if the primordial universe was not a Singularity but billions of black holes in orbits around each other? LOVE THA SHOW!!!

Super massive black holes were able to be created because early stars were so extremely big that black holes formed inside the star. This actually has an effect of drawing in more mass unlike supernovae which push mass away

@herbalterrorist420

10 ай бұрын

Soo do you think white holes could possible be or appear to be stars that have regular novas I’m unsure what the name is now as it eludes me (recurrent novas maybe?) Maybe those novas are explosions of matter being ejected from a white hole that is either at the centre of the star or just is the star. I mean I don’t know what a white hole would look like but I would suppose it’s the opposite of a black hole so would potentially look like a star of some sort and when matter is ejected it would potentially appear like a star that has recurrent novas every however often.( our own sun/star apparently does this and has recurrent novas every how ever many millions of years). I don’t think it’s 100% proven but I think there was some evidence to suggest our sun does do this and was a theorised to potentially explain some of the extinction events and other events possibly caused by the sun having recurrent novas.

Take french lace stocking (or any stretchy fabric. Pinch and pull. Where you pinch is a contraction as an analogy of a black hole. But if you are at that singularity, that pinching is your norm. So you experience the rest of the fabric as being pulled away, moving away from you from. Like dark enegy. So we can say that if we are in a black hole, dark energy is the pulling of the previous univers.

If black holes are supposedly singularities, which means they would be only one dimensional, and also have infinite mass. So...how can they be "super massive" if they already have infinite mass (hence the reason why light can't escape them)? I remember one strange item from advanced math is that (supposedly) some "infinities" are larger than other "infinities". When I saw that, I said, "Say, what?!" 🤯 I might have to look that back up again just to see if there's been any further explanation on *that* subject. 🤔

@SreedharVenugopal

11 ай бұрын

I think it's not that they have infinite mass, but they have infinite density, as their volume is considered to be 0. Any mass divided by something approaching 0, would have its density tending to infinity.

So a thought just occurred to me. If we were anywhere close to the universal center (close being entirely relative given the incredible distances we are looking at) if the Big Crunch were to start, and it were to happen at the speed of light, would we even be able to tell in our lifetimes? If I understand this at all, the absolute farthest galaxies we see are red shifted, meaning they move away from us. They also say that the universe is spreading faster than light at those extreme distances. How long before the red shift goes away, or would the very fact that the universe has started to crunch effect the light coming to us and render it to the blue shift end of the spectrum? Or would the Big Crunch be more like popping a bubble, or is that the Big Rip theory?

@kingyoung5228

10 ай бұрын

Big crunch has been ruled out awhile ago. The current consensus is that everything will just die out and nothing will exist this is known as heat death or big freeze. This will happen when the universe reaches its maximum state of entropy.

Black holes are not infinitely dense, in fact the larger they get, the lower their average density. Counterintuitively, if it were possible to create a waterproof shell just outside the event horizon of a supermassive black hole, it would float in water.

@darthvicious9447

10 ай бұрын

If true, can you present your calculations?

@YoutubeHandlesSuckBalls

10 ай бұрын

@@darthvicious9447 I can't post any links here to the many explanations of this that are out there, so to point you in the right direction, just google "supermassive black holes would float" Anyway. Anything infinitely dense would have infinite gravity, and this would be infinite at any distance. If you think otherwise, you do not understand infinity. It is more accurate when dealing with real objects of this nature to say that using the standard model, or anything by Einstein, we do not have the mathematics to explain what happens beyond the event horizon of a black hole, because when we plug the numbers into the best equations we have, we get infinities. That is a completely different thing from the reality being an infinitely dense object.

1: the cyclical universe theory is actually called the Big Bounce theory 2: Black holes are nowhere near as mysterious as human females. 3: white holes would make more sense if scientists considered an antimatter universe inside the center of the big bang explosion. 4: Although I'm already familiar with all of these theories this was still a fun video to watch.

@zna9297

11 ай бұрын

women would be less mysterious if you stopped calling them females lol talk abt ppl like theyre in a science textbook wtf

Fantastic Episode Simon & Crew. spaced me right out..s'cuse the pun :D

I wish Simon could make five hour videos. Also does anyone know if he can speak Czech? That would be really neat if he could.

@ThatWriterKevin

11 ай бұрын

Casual Criminalist has a number of 2-3 hour videos. And I believe he's stated on Brain Blaze that his wife speaks Czech but he is very bad at it

If the universe is just on a wheel of crunch/bang then maybe there is a critical mass at which the crunch explodes. maybe that mass isn't every single bit of matter. That would leave it possible for some matter to not have been sucked in due to it's distance from the crunch. Of course this would require the actual space the matter is in to also not be dragged in to the crunch. Science, questions, question, questions...

It's interesting to think about information at the Big Bang. All information today was there, since it can't be created or destroyed. To me, this strongly implies there was something before the Big Bang, and that existence is somehow infinite in time. Energy is one thing, but I can't fathom how all this specific information could've come from nothing.

@kingyoung5228

10 ай бұрын

It could not have information does not come from nothing information only comes from an intelligent source that's is an observable fact information in nature is billions of times more complex than even the smartest computers we have I'm not sure then why scientists are so quick to assume naturalism.

We'll never observe a white hole directly because it would repel the light you're trying to use. Also, if it was the big bang, a second white hole showing up in our universe would likely be a cataclysmic event, right?

I like the idea that a black hole is not a singularly, but rather one gigantic star with matter so compressed that the mass multiples the gravitational effects of the area. That once you pass through the event horizon you actually just get slammed against a trillion degree wall of burning compress matter. A neutron star is basically just super condensed iron to the point its basically one gigantic atom. When 2 neutron stars merge they form a black hole, So the masses of the 2 neutron stars just moerge into one bigger ball if super compressed matter that they now have the combined mass to pull in everything in including light.

@aaronperelmuter8433

7 ай бұрын

That’s SO wrong, on many levels. 🤥For a start, neutron stars have NOTHING whatsoever to do with being “super condensed iron to the point it’s basically one big atom”. 😱They are NOT made from iron, nor does an iron core necessarily have to be present in the progenitor star to create a neutron star. 🤔Moreover, a neutron star, quite surprisingly, is like one big neutron, NOT one big atom. 😱Thought that would be obvious, from the name? 🤨Furthermore, 2 neutron stars can collide and form a larger neutron star, there is nothing that states all neutron star collisions will create a bh, that, again, is absolutely wrong. 🤥 Regarding your imaginary bh, how does compressing matter magically produce extra amounts of gravity? 🤔That makes no sense and there’s no physical process by which this could occur. 🤪And if said matter was so compressed, how could it possibly be at such a high temperature if it’s in such a tiny volume? 😂If the matter is all in such a small volume, and, somehow, behind an eh, how does it keep such high temperatures within its centre? Again, what you’re saying is completely non-sensical and isn’t logically consistent. It’s devoid of rational processes and ideas. 😂🤪🤪

This is good stuff. from a very avid consumer of the fact boi. this is good stuff.

Nice job everyone. Very professional

Stellar mass black holes have to be around 23X the mass of our sun. It's called Chandra Sachar limit. My spelling probably wrong.

What if movement is an illusion? Particles are just a wave in the matter field and just appear and disappear as the wave passes. Every spot in the universe has the intrinsic quality to create matter if the surrounding area promotes it. Time dilation is just a change in how fast or slow this appearances and disappearances occur. It makes sense that if your moving fast it is harder to these changes occur. Also if you have a lot of mass that tries to keep bodies together it would be harder to makes those changes from spot to spot

"How many drugs did you ingest before coming up with this theory?" 😂😂😂 Had me dying

Just a thought; is it possible that what we measure as dark-energy is actually a white-hole. That is - stuff goes into a black-hole at a point and comes out everywhere else as dark-energy?

Just thinking aloud... Why do we assume that there's one big band and one big crunch for the entire universe... Why can't the big attractor attract enough to create localised big crunch leading to localised big bang in turn and the universe in other parts keeps expanding forever... No not possible??

What if white holes are cosmically linked via quantum entanglement to corresponding black holes and white holes simply spew out the mass consumed by the linked black hole. Haha wow as soon as I submitted the above, I got to the exact part where you mentioned the exact theory I thought of myself lol.

What really blows my mind is that science communication is still using the term 'theory' when they actually mean 'hypothesis'.

@kingyoung5228

10 ай бұрын

This comment deserves infinitely more attention. Unfortunately, most people do not know any better.

If the universe started out as one big chunk of matter, isn't that by definition the biggest black hole that could ever exist? And it couldn't stay that way forever, so it went blewie, and spread out in all directions. While it could have broken down to atoms with the atomic number of 1 (I can never keep hydrogen and helium straight), there also could have been chunks of substantial size. And those chunks attracted much of the rest of the debris, and that's why galaxies were formed.

@kingyoung5228

10 ай бұрын

Matter is a by product of the big bang

As the saying goes, the universe isn’t weirder than we imagine. It’s weirder than we can imagine.

I like to think the big bang was the most massive of super massive Black holes dying and releasing all the matter it condensed as a white hole into space.

7:49 Hahaha Sam has serious competition :-D based editors you always have Simon hahaha

white holes exist in the center of a blackholer because angular momentum must be conserved. the white hole behaves through the lens of hawkins radiation. Its only because light cannot be confined to a single vector because the energy state of the universe is atleast currently too dense for quantum fluctuation to not exist.

Maybe we’re in a reverse whirlpool universe in a flowing river style constantly squeezed in to the gravity pulling all the galaxies to be vomited back into the centre of our universe or a parallel

i’ve always wondered why the big bang had to start in nothing. Is there anything that would prevent it from happening in an existing ‘space’?

@bvldr

11 ай бұрын

@@brandondenny226not exactly. most recent measurements regarding the curvature or shape of the universe has found that it is flat and open, so not even including dark energy, the universe will not end as the Big Crunch, and especially not if we include dark energy.

@bvldr

11 ай бұрын

@@brandondenny226 sure.

@bvldr

11 ай бұрын

@@brandondenny226 objectively wrong. I can’t tell if you’re trolling or not but lol if you’re going to completely ignore the current measurements regarding the shape of the universe and then also act like escape velocity isn’t a thing then you might wanna do some more research

@bvldr

11 ай бұрын

@@brandondenny226 sure bud

@bvldr

11 ай бұрын

@@brandondenny226 why not just show all your research now and change humanity forever? I’d *love* to see all the work and research you’ve done lmao

Every time Simon says event horizon I feel an urgent need to watch Event Horizon. In every video he mentions it.

@dianapennepacker6854

11 ай бұрын

Too bad that the original movie was burnt and lost. Deemed too intense at test viewing when they showed more of hell. Seriously need to make a remake or sequel with all gloves off. Tie it into 40k too! A nod with a scientist named Geller who survives it and later researched a protective field to travel. Has the potential to be the scariest movie ever IMO. Something about hell being extra dimensional strikes terror into me.

@MaD0MaT

11 ай бұрын

@@dianapennepacker6854 Not in our lives. People became even more sensitive than back when it was released. It would be remade as pg-13 with its balls cut off.

@dianapennepacker6854

11 ай бұрын

@@MaD0MaT Hey you never know! Get that funded privately. It is a cult classic! Anderson is down for a sequel. You're right though on how Hollywood is getting even more sensitive. People are more sensitive. We gave those people too much power. They are much louder than us. There will never ever be a movie like Tropic Thunder for instance. That movie was brilliant. Only a fool would get offended by it but here we are.

This was my comment and theory about the negative n positive black holes that could theoretically connect them but would be detectable so they would theoretically have to connect us in other dimensions or possible they have to be opposite to each so the other side of the galaxies/ universal galaxies we can’t detect is where they might be and others theory’s I have other theories this if anyone is in groups I’d love to be apart of n discuss stuff like this

What if a white hole is even more opposite than a black hole. What if instead of being the size of a dense black hole, they are more like a huge expanding bubble in empty spaces between Galaxy clusters. Wouldn't that help to explain the web like structure of the universe and the expansion.

all very interesting, but why are goals scored in games that I'm watching - even games I've recorded - when I leave the room to take a leak?

It's actually more useful to listen to these without watching. As much as i enjoy the images, the scales are impossibly incomprehensible, especially when trying to gauge with the eyes

I think Yuki Nagato developed the holographic universe, except I guess she would call everything data instead of information. :P

@MrWillT

11 ай бұрын

This nerdy throwback reference made me chuckle a bit

Man I love Simon tube so many good channels this man must work 24/7

If black holes are supposedly singularities, which means they would be only one dimensional, and also have infinite mass. So...how can they be "super massive" if they already have infinite mass (hence the reason why light can't escape them -- infinite mass = infinite gravity)? I remember one strange item from advanced math is that (supposedly) some "infinities" are larger than other "infinities". When I saw that, I said, "Say, what?!" 🤯 I might have to look that back up again just to see if there's been any further explanation on *that* subject. 🤔

All this just makes me think we have no idea what's been going on. We have no idea how the universe began or how it might end or whether it's cyclical or if it's part of a matrix-like setup, or... anything, really. We're just making things up, throwing them out there, and seeing if any of it sticks.

My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." "V-ger's" message has sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or, "Terran Time." It will be faster still when "V-ger" sends a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. (That name is still up for grabs.) Then there's Outside the Local Group time bubble, so on and so on until we get to the, "True Interstellar Time Standard." Now that "V-ger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." This can be proven by turning off everything except its clock and transmitter. Have "V-ger" read time for as long as possible. They WILL show the flow of time speeds up the further away you get from any celestial bodies. Until you reach the Milky Way's time standard or "Mikey's Time." •Our sun's time bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured. •Milky Way's time bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until V-ger is outside the Ort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. Just for reference. •Local Group's time bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference. •Outside any influence in the, "True Interstellar Time Standard," or...;-P Name NOT up for grabs BUT just begging to be measured. The rate/flow of time is fastest here. (Time flows fastest here so it's best to have your motor boat.) ;-P A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about. The Milky Way's Interstellar Time Standard will be known as, "Mikey's Time." Pass it on, please and thank you

I love space. Simon's pretty ok too.

I think the inflation of space time makes the cyclical universe theory impossible. There is always the possibility we don’t understand inflation correctly.

My theory has always been that the supermassive black holes would all join together during the big crunch. Having effectively eaten the universe, all that matter & information can no longer be contained by even the Super-Duper Ultra-Mega Black Hole™, resulting in what one might call abbig bang. Sounds good in my head, at least. Lol.

Thank you for breaking down holographic universe theory like that. That's beautiful shit.