Fluorescence microscopy for around $20

Using a blue LED flashlight (torch) and yellow filter with a simple stereo or compound microscope to view fluorescent samples.

Пікірлер: 30

  • @FulvioGa
    @FulvioGaАй бұрын

    A lot of information in this video!

  • @sadiebaker5111
    @sadiebaker51113 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much for the detailed explanations! Genius!

  • @natedoggraymond
    @natedoggraymond3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much! Brilliant!

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    3 жыл бұрын

    Glad it was helpful!

  • @williammauzey8342
    @williammauzey83423 жыл бұрын

    Nice presentation Clive!

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    3 жыл бұрын

    Glad you liked it!

  • @rberdan1
    @rberdan13 жыл бұрын

    We use something similar in research to record fluorescence in neurons injected with fluorescent dyes - only any 12 V or bright light works by place a BG -12 (Blue Green) filter in front o the light (no yellow filter required). Of course the filters cost more then your set up but can be used with any bright flash light to view fluorescence with a stereoscope and a yellow filter is not needed. Other UV lights also work and is used to view lichen, rocks etc.

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    3 жыл бұрын

    The yellow filter is used to block the scattered (blue) excitation light. You may get away without it for strongly fluorescence samples which have a low scatter. The cheap yellow filters used in this demonstration block most of the scattered light, but a blue background is observed for Nile Red-stained plastic fragments because of Rayleigh scattering. For highest sensitivity, research grade emission filters with an optical density > 4 at the excitation wavelength are required (OD > 6 for single fluorophore detection).

  • @RATAMUR1

    @RATAMUR1

    2 жыл бұрын

    Es cierto que añadirle un filtro de color azul QB24 - BG12 se emplea para fluorescencia de bajo coste. Enlaces: canadiannaturephotographer.com/diffential_interference_microscopy.html es.aliexpress.com/item/32889032226.html?spm=a2g0s.9042311.0.0.24ef63c0OB0YTk

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@RATAMUR1 If you already have a bright white light source, then adding a blue filter in front will also work. But it is more efficient to use a blue LED in the first place because this reduces the problem of other wavelengths breaking through a blue filter. LEDs are cheaper than quality filters. Best results (i.e. selectivity of fluorescence over scattered light) would be obtained using a narrow band LED (or laser) in combination with a sharp bandpass excitation and emission filters.

  • @JustDux
    @JustDux Жыл бұрын

    Looks like I can use (or make) dark field condenser, replace microscope LED with UV LED and put yellow film on cover slip

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    Жыл бұрын

    That might work. I tried putting a blue filter in front of the built-in LED and using a dark field patch stop but it was not as bright as using a separate focused LED flashlight.

  • @rajumeganathan3275
    @rajumeganathan32752 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for your explanation. Excellent work Mam. I have one doubt. Can we adopt this method to quantify Microplastics in soil extract, Leachate (other than freshwater)? We will remove organic content prior to quantification.

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hi Raju . The microscopy should work, The biggest challenge is to remove all the organic content. There are several papers in the literature which describe the required treatments (e.g. using H2O2 oxidation) but we have not tried them because our seawater samples do not have too much background signal.

  • @rajumeganathan3275

    @rajumeganathan3275

    2 жыл бұрын

    Thank you mam

  • @WarMarsM
    @WarMarsM2 жыл бұрын

    Is there any particular yellow filter you recommend?

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    2 жыл бұрын

    The ones I used are no longer available but these look similar: www.amazon.com/LingoFoto-Filter-Orange-Pockets-Cleaning/dp/B08ZK9J737/ref=sr_1_14?crid=1CTRB6MXPCN41&keywords=37mm%2Bacrylic%2Bcolor%2Bfilters&qid=1652151191&s=electronics&sprefix=37%2Bmm%2Bacrylic%2Bcolor%2Bfilters%2Celectronics%2C159&sr=1-14&th=1

  • @legoworks-cg5hk
    @legoworks-cg5hk5 ай бұрын

    Wouldn't a uv light be better?

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    5 ай бұрын

    That depends on the fluorophore. We used this set up to look at Microplastics stained with Nile Red dye for which blue is best. For autofluoresence would be good.

  • @johndubose6589
    @johndubose6589 Жыл бұрын

    Nice, very simple!

  • @irishguy200007
    @irishguy2000073 жыл бұрын

    Why a yellow filter

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    3 жыл бұрын

    To block the blue light scattered by the sample that would swamp the fluorescence signal (lets through green, yellow and red)

  • @xkachlara5616
    @xkachlara56163 жыл бұрын

    hallo i'm chlara from indonesia. i wanna ask to you, how about the wavelength LED? in my country it's difficult to find led blue light in 450 nm wavelength only 395 nm. is it recommendation to use or not?

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    3 жыл бұрын

    395 nm does not work so well with Nile Red, but can be used to excite chlorophyll fluorescence. For 450 nm, we used the WAYLLSHINE Scalable Blue LED 3 Mode Blue Light Flashlight ordered from Amazon

  • @xkachlara5616

    @xkachlara5616

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@clivebagshaw2805 could you give me recommendation for amazon's store? because there are many wayllshine options

  • @clivebagshaw2805

    @clivebagshaw2805

    3 жыл бұрын

    Try www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01C2D7SRA/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

  • @albertsiburian6406

    @albertsiburian6406

    2 жыл бұрын

    Makasih kak sudah mewakilkan gua ❤️