I enjoyed the talk about the scopes BUT the fact that you are building a private school, FANTASTIC. Keep up the good work. From Down Under.

Very well explained. My hunting scopes are SFP with cross hairs, my long range scopes are FFP with tactical radicals (MRAD in my case) thumbs up for the private school!

The subtension holdovers on a SFP scope cost me a cow elk in Utah several years ago. It was totally my fault. At this time, I was fully aware that adjusting the magnification on a SFP scope can change your holdovers. I was hunting in the timber and kept my Nikon scope with BDC reticle at the lowest magnification. I dropped down into a canyon and was hiking the bottom when all of a sudden a small heard of elk ran down one side of the mountain and stopped right in the bottom of the canyon 320 yards away. This should have been a fairly easy shot for me, but I rushed things and forgot to dial my magnification back to max. I used my 2nd holdover circle, which was dead on at 300 yards at full magnification, however, at the lowest magnification setting that same same circle was now dead on at 540 yards. The difference in drop was 34.5 inches. Needless to say, I shot way over her back. I ate tag soup that trip and it has always been a valuable yet bitter reminder to slow down and check things before making a shot. I still hunt with that same rifle and scope and have harvested game since then. I don't have a preference one way or another as I own both FFP and SFP scopes and believe that both can be suited for hunting and long range shooting depending on the application. Thank you Jim for continuing to create good content.

@muchomango2703

2 жыл бұрын

I read that first sentence and went "wait wait wait. YOU cost you a cow elk." Then I read the second sentence and felt like a jerk. But really, this is a great reminder for me as well.

@jasontassey9013

2 жыл бұрын

@@muchomango2703 LOL That's funny. I still feel like a jerk for making that mistake. However, it has been the single most valuable mistake I have ever made hunting, knowing I will never do it again. I was just sharing in the hopes that my experience could help out others. Thanks for sharing.

@Nick-sx6jm

2 жыл бұрын

@@jasontassey9013 Same situation happened to me a few years ago. I was deer hunting in WI and had a 243 topped off with a vortex second focal plane. This was at our cabin where we have multiple stands with multiple shooting lanes, fields, and marshes that are 300-400 yards long. The stand I was in had 2 lanes and a field that were over 300 so you really have to pay attention and be ready for a shot because they usually dont linger around in the lanes and can pop out anywhere. An 11pt buck popped out at about 225 and I held over at the first dash as it was about 225. I forgot the scope was not zoomed in all the way and hit it high in the back. Luckily the buck was just stunned and I was able to get a second shot which dropped him like a bag of bricks. But after that I ended up switching guns to something more powerful, not because of the scope but because I dont think 243 is ideal for shooting big bodied northern deer at over 300. Good thing I did because after that I ended up shooting bucks at 350 yards the next two years with a 257 wby and 28 nos.

@FinalLugiaGuardian

2 жыл бұрын

One thing I learned over the years. If you know you gear and its quirks, you will do well. Anither example. If you have an APSC camera instead of a full frame camera, you should use different aperture settings to get the same results. Instead of setting your aperture to an f-stop of f5.6 on APSC, set it to and f-stop of f3.5 to get the same depth of field as a full frame camera set at f5.6.

@1776carpediem

Жыл бұрын

I did this same thing a couple years ago on my first mule deer buck. I shot over his back and couldn’t understand why. Luckily because of the canyon and sound, he was confused on where I was and walked towards me and I was able to take him within 60 yards.

Great for you guys starting your own school, I am fed up also and running for a local school board position. Good luck and blessing to your family and school.

I actually like a second focal plane with an moa type reticle on a hunting rifle. At shorter distances, I don't have to deal with the shrinking reticle and at longer distances of 300+ yards where the holdover points and windage come into play, I will be at max magnification anyway.

@brandonudenby5609

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly 💯👏🏻

@sergeantdwz5783

2 жыл бұрын

This right here is my exact opinion

@pogeegitz

2 жыл бұрын

Agree 100%, especially if chances are very slim of taking shots over 400 yards where I do most of my hunting. I've had an FFP and it was difficult to see and more complicated than I needed. Also, SFP is fine to be zoomed all the way in up to about 16x, but starts to get impractical above that

@MrThunderbumper

2 жыл бұрын

Chad M’s comment is 100% correct from someone who has obviously already gone down the FFP rabbit hole, and found his way back out again. FFP is expensive, and entirely unnecessary unless you’re running a super high magnification scope like 20+ power magnification for 800+ yard shooting. With that large magnification range it is possible you wouldn’t want to zoom all the way in. For everything below 600 yards a 12x scope is more than enough zoom capability, and you’ll always zoom all the way in when over 300 yards as Chad pointed out. Great comment Chad. I always hate the 1,000 yard guys convincing the vast majority of hunters that a SFP scope is a bad choice for

@jason91notch

2 жыл бұрын

I agree 100%. In a hunting scenario where seconds count, I want a clean, easy reticle that isn’t busy and I can acquire my target quickly. I know yardage for my subtensions at max zoom so it just makes it painless and easy when stress/blood pressure/anticipation is extremely high.

The old scope I grew up with, you needed a screw driver to adjust for elevation and wind, so holding over just comes naturally....same in judging distance, many hours of shooting smaller targets like rabbits really helps. Now my choice is a red/green luminated 1st focal plane.

@rolandgeorges960

Жыл бұрын

I'm a Dino, the same here, amazing similarities.

@lexwaldez

Жыл бұрын

This is the way. I think people forgot how to shoot when you're hunting with all this fancy-schmancy horseshit. Really good glass, a wide field view, and learn your holds. Never touch the turrets on a hunting rifle after zero. The one thing I DO like about new scopes is the illumination in low light. Now THAT is super handy (imho oc).

@rolandgeorges960

Жыл бұрын

@@lexwaldez That's what I think. I kept it simple for 50 + years hunting & it always worked.

I’ve just always placed the crosshairs on the body adjusted for drop at the distance I’m shooting. Always works. If I know at 300 yards it will drop 4 inches, I put my crosshairs a little above the heart- lung area. Shot a big muley in Colorado at approximately 600 yards and was aiming above his back, dropped him. Just practice practice practice.

@robertboyd3863

8 ай бұрын

The very best way has worked fine for me , I done the same in CO. many years ago

@christiand6768

6 ай бұрын

Exactly my thinking to. Just adjust on the target. For hunting and the apocalypse sfp makes more sense in my mind. Ffp for long range competition I can see a point but not in real life situations.

THANK YOU! I completely agree with the choice of duplex reticles on sub-150 yard second focal plane optics! I know many shooters like them, but IMO, BDC reticles on second focal plane scopes are visually cluttered and only meaningful at one magnification. Long range shooting is a different matter altogether. And I completely agree that FFP scopes hold significant advantage. Here, the reticles are still visually cluttered, but absolutely necessary. Love the channel! Please keep up the good work!

I'm an old school Iron sights, instinctive shooter guy, this scope stuff is new to me. Your video's are great.

@RocksNRuts4

13 күн бұрын

same, im good at 300 w/ irons

As a Brit, 61 years old. Lots of shooting experience (in the past, and now back again!) I just watched this vid, and the one for MOA V's Mildot. Seriously, I learned MORE from these two, than in the last year during my occasional "Research". Nice one mate, and thank you

I've tried both, and I find I prefer SFP scopes. I know FFP optics are freaking awesome, but I've made the individual choice to stick to SFP for the following reasons: 1. My middle aged / old man eyes can't see the FFP reticle for squat when it's not zoomed out. May as well be a tiny dot to me. 2. When I shoot, I tend to be zoomed all the way out, or all the way in, and almost never in between. 3. I haven't ventured out of .308 Win for logistical reasons. So I stick with a 300 yard zero. For the most part, all i need to keep in mind, depending on bullet weight, is my POI can be 3 to 6" high inside that zero. Once I hit 300 yards, it's an entirely different game ballistically speaking. At which point, i'm all the way zoomed out for proper subtensions anyway. 4. Keeping It Simple cause I'm Stupid. (KISS)

@scbane

2 жыл бұрын

I have rarely dialed a scope up past 4-6x for a shit, regardless of distance.

@phild9813

2 жыл бұрын

I also prefer SFPs for many of the same reasons. I could see how FFPs with the complex “tree” type reticles would be beneficial for long range target shooters with good eyes in particular. I don’t turn dials while hunting, as I am a firm believer in being able to be able to take shots as quickly as possible and limit confusion. I don’t want to venture to say how many opportunities are lost due to dial turning. Basic BDC reticles in SFP are all the complexity I need.

@wesleyturner1979

2 жыл бұрын

You nailed it. If you have an extended range zero, only long shots will need holds and you just have to make sure your on max! Good comment!

@annexpaint

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the information. well done on the school best of luck with that

@DD-gi6kx

6 ай бұрын

if you can't see FFP reticle when zoomed out, you should have had a different reticle, that should never be a reason to not use FFP also instead of using old man eyes as a reason get a scope with a diopter adjust

I fall in with the minority 20%ers and I am quite adamant about it. I am old school and I know the benefits of FFP are good arguments but I don't do a heck of a lot of missing targets with my SFP scope anyway so I stick with what has always worked well for me. I dont like crosshairs fouling my view and I am a minimalist when it comes to reticles. But I will never tell anyone they are wrong about this or that preference of equipment. We all need to be humble about these things. Thanks for your videos. I know a lot of work and effort goes into their making they are very good research tools! Be well and may God bless your private school project. I know He will brother!

I'm 68 & appreciate Ur explaining the difference between the 2 types of focal planes! Since I have all First Focal planve scopes I think I'll stick with another one but am more comfortable doing so now thanx to Ur video!!! Great job & thanx

This review is absolutely on the money, very good comment using a simple duplex reticle for SFP.

One big thing you left out about 2nd is that at half the magnification it’s super easy to just cut your moa in half. When you talked about dialing that 24 power maven to 10 then the subtensions are wrong, well just dial to 12 and cut your moa in half.

@bedlamite42

2 жыл бұрын

Yep, my Vortex PST 2.5-10 is 2nd focal plane and has detents at 5x, and 3.3x allowing for 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4

@Jeff_Seely

Жыл бұрын

Yup. That's exactly what I do. Very smart point!

@KethenGoesHam

Жыл бұрын

Can you explain this a little better to me

@chrisgunsandguitars1403

2 ай бұрын

@@KethenGoesHam my SFP scope is 5.5x-22x. Half of 22 is 11 and half of that is 5.5, or full MOA, half MOA, .25 MOA. So a SFP reticle has subtensions that are only accurate at full 22x power in MY scope. Say I want to hold 4 MOA for wind. The reticle stays the same with a SFP at any magnification. So if 22x is too much for the task at hand, I just change to 11x. The deer, in this scenario, will be 2x larger even though the reticle stays the same size. So I would cut that 4 MOA in half and use 2 MOA. If I were to choose 5.5x, I would cut that in half again and use 1 MOA. Of course shots 25-200yds the difference isn’t enough to make a difference. Then use any power you want pretty much. I generally only use 3 power settings with this scope….5.5, 11, and 22x when there is wind to worry about beyond 200yds. Hope this helps!

@anubis8680

2 ай бұрын

So let me resurrect a zombie old post here... The subtentions and dialing for that matter, in a SFP scope are only accurate at one distance usually the max magnification. take a 6-24 scope, if you dial say 5 moa and hold 2 moa on the subtentions, for 7 moa at max zoom, if you were to shift that to 12x power and have those 5 dialed, and 2 held, it would actually add up to 14 moa of elevation. Half the power doubles the hold. and if you were to go to say 8 zoom it would go up even more like 21 MOA I think. The power of a 2nd focal plane scope really shines in long distance shooting, I got one on a 300 RUM and can dial a mile, if I go to 12 power that same dial and holds would get me so much further. FFP scopes due to their zoomy construction generally don't have as much vertical travel as a SFP scope. Yes it can mess you up if you don't know how to use the tool, but instead just dial and hold center and it will be accurate at any zoom level. I was looking to see if any one explained this out yet why 2FP scopes can be really really good. The explination at the end going to duplex, literally destroys like the only great advantage of a SFP scope. It boggles me why you would give that up. @@KethenGoesHam

I have never tried a FFP scope but this is the first video that made sense to me. Thankyou!

Good video. One thing I’d like to add or clarify is that the first focal plane reticle is the same size no matter what. Zoomed in, it takes up just as much of the target as zoomed out. A second focal plane takes up more of the target area zoomed out than zoomed in.

Excellent video, thanks. The choice between FFP and SFP begs the question regarding intended use. There are three main sighting methods - turret dialing; reticle holdover; and max point blank range (MPBR). Many who grew up with SFP scopes for hunting have learned to use MPBR with holdover for windage. This makes sense to anyone who has had a game animal in the crosshairs and realizes there is no time to adjust turrets - heart pounding, breathing heavy, etc. What I do is to use MPBR and pre-dial according to the estimated distance and target size (e.g., 6 inches, 10 inches, etc.). For example, a 10 inch target (for my load) says to adjust up 3.4 inches to give a 330 yard zero with a MPBR of 390 yards. If I expect up to a 400 shot, then I set accordingly. If I think the shot will be closer, then I would set the MPBR for a smaller target size. I created a dope card that sets the target size from 2 inches out to 18 inches, so I'm good out to 500 yards.

@MooShaka89

Жыл бұрын

Goddamn I don't know what any of that means because I'm new to this (was a combat medic so my only experience really is an M4 plus a new AR in about to build and not sure what scope to put on it).

@cacinaz8802

Жыл бұрын

@@MooShaka89 Congrats on your new AR. What will you use it for? Based on your response, I (or others) can suggest some scopes to consider.

@cacinaz8802

Жыл бұрын

@@MooShaka89 Also tell me more about your AR build. Is it a AR15 (e.g., 223/556) or AR10 (e.g., 6.5 creedmoor, 7.62/308)?

Another great video Jim. I use a Vortex viper HS 2.5-10X44 in sfp. A really great scope for the price, no fancy bells and whistles on it. The last thing I want to be doing out there in the field is have to be messing around with turrets and parolaxe adjustments. With SFP scope, if for example you have the scope zeroed in at say 200yds, that POI never changes know matter how you change the zoom. Meaning the center of the crosshair. Right? ............Just what to touch on the school thing. I worked in the public school system up here in Canada for 30 years, and if the snow flake teaching atmosphere is anything like it is up here in Canada then our kids are really in trouble. For example, telling young girls that being overweight is beautiful and attractive is just mindblowing to me. The clap there pushing up here is appalling imo. Where little boys and little girls don't know weather they're supposed to be boys or girls or something else. I'll just stop right there.

@pizza4prezident143

4 ай бұрын

Christ is coming. Thats better? Yes

Awesome move on building the private school. I hope more parents follow your lead, it is precisely what America needs. I support you 100%

@southern_merican

Жыл бұрын

Yep. Its just a matter of time before that catches on ! Hiring teachers shouldn't be a problem. Just give a few rules first ,like u stated earlier, they will agree to.

@jaysonmartinez2830

Жыл бұрын

100%

@Whitetailpursuer

Жыл бұрын

X2 What Mr. Ryan said! Good luck!!!

@mylesharvey6488

10 ай бұрын

Actually it is the worst idea in the US! Jefferson had it right. Unfortunately the US fights itself today. Great scope exploitation.😊

@RealBigT1345

2 ай бұрын

Nice

Awesome news on the school. My son attended a similar start-up private school in the Pensacola, FL area. District punished one of their principals for saying (not leading) a prayer. He quit and founded LEAD Academy. Enrollment filled right up. There is a demand out there.

@Stephen-uz8dm

2 жыл бұрын

There is a huge demand. The freaks that are charged with shaping the next generation are not representative of the average parents.

I've really been enjoying your videos since I found your channel a few weeks ago, but your short edited insert is really what drove it all home for me lol. I appreciate you brother! Keep up the great work and thank you so much for all of the information.

For 40 years I never touched a scope knob unless I was working up a load or sighting in at the target range. I compensated with hold-over or beside in the field; have a couple BDC reticles. Now I have become adventurous and I have a "ranging" elevation turret (VX5-HD - FireDot) for my preferred load. Never owned a FFP and don't intend to ever buy one. But then 400 yards is extreme long range for me on the powerlines and the dark hemlock stands and brushy woodlots I hunt I seldom have 200 yards open view.

Great video. I never knew the difference til now. Thanks!

I prefer SFP for hunting and recreational shooting. Agree with Jim about only wanting a duplex reticle for SFP... which is why I got a Trijicon AccuPoint 3-9x40 duplex with illuminated green center dot. Amazing scope.

Excellent explanation. I keep things simple (or as simple as I can) so all my optics are second focal plane with a duplex. For hunting I don't really need anything more

@robertboyd3863

8 ай бұрын

That is the perfect hunting scope

I got this nice illuminated recticle (red & green with 5 brightness levels) 4-16x scope with marks for 200, 300, 400, and 500 yards (assuming a 100 yd zero) that fit nicely into my budget. Sadly, it's a 2nd focal plane scope, which means if I wanna use those marks, I gotta keep it zoomed in. But... I can probably make it work. Excellent video. I was one of the ones who didn't know the difference before watching this vid. This knowledge will be quite useful the next time I'm out searching for rifle optics.

@larryfoster2227

Жыл бұрын

Be careful to read instructions. I have seen 6-24 power scopes in second focal plan that the hash marks work on 16 power and not all the way up. Vortex scope I believe.

Great video Jim. Im a second focal at the moment but if i get another scope i would seriously look at a first. Good luck with the school also.

Excellent explanation & examples. Thank you.

At the ranges I hunt, I prefer 2nd focal plane and MOA. BUT…when target shooting, I use first focal plane and MILS. I have no trouble at all switching between the 2. But a low magnification shot, at close ranges, the first focal plane reticles can be next to impossible to see.

Great breakdown. Simplifies things a bit. Thanks

My mil dot is supposed. I've done my home work with subtension. I have found where I increase or decrease magnification I been able to move dot to point of impact like clicking to said distance. Use to hunt alot of groundhogs at 500+ and factory groundhog class matches. That's how I learned to use sfp to my personal experiences. Wish you the very best with the school. Hear you on the issues at hand. Big Love from Salty Army 🧂

I like both... First focal plane for FFP is great for precision, long range targets, and shots that involve you dialing in the shot. Second focal plane is better for closer range, faster "tactical" type shooting where you keep a constant zero and " close enough" shots are perfectly acceptable, and you can correct with a follow up shot

One thing I wish you would have mentioned about the second focal plane scopes is that at extended distances u can use lower magnification to ur advantage. Mainly on paper or steel. I have used it in hunting also. Take a 3x18 for example. If u go to 9x all of ur moa or mil hash marks in the reticle just doubled in there value. Could be a pro could be con depending on the person or application. Works great on a bdc scope especially if u think of ur circles for there value not the yardage.

Thanks for this video! Just what I was looking for.

I liked the video but subscribed When I heard what your building over the hill. So glad more and more people are doing something about it

Second focal plane for me. I do mostly open area hunting in South Africa, in the Karoo. However as a rule I never shoot past 300 meters. The magnification stays at max, cause the animals dont like us to get closer than 100meters (more like 200meters) I

@isaiah9683

2 жыл бұрын

What is your maximum magnification?

Thank you for another great video. I just recently discovered your channel. Subscribed!

Thanks for these videos, I’m just getting into learning about scopes so this is really helpful. Feel like I want something good quality but simple. Don’t think I’ll be shooting past 300yds. I recently bought a Ruger 10/22 and a cheap Bushnell banner 1.5-4.5 for it. I eventually want to get a quality bolt action and good scope but also want to learn how to use it first LOL. Anyways, thanks again for the info.

Very educational video, thank you! Good luck with the school too!🍀

I have the Burris Eliminator 3. Although it is second focal plane, it calculates from the distance (built in rangefinder) and from the magnification how many vertical lines to hold over for every 10mph of crosswind.

I use Leupold's boone & crockett reticle which is SFP. I sight it for MPBR so I don't have to rely on subtensions unless I need to take a longer shot, for which I'll zoom to max power and just hold over. For me this is the easiest and fastest way for shooting game up to reasonable distances.

I run a 200 yard 0 on my hunting rifles. Between that, a range finder, and knowing how many moa of adjustment I need for 300, 350, and 400 yards, that's all I really need. Plus I can get more scope for the same money (typically). While first is fine as well, I do appreciate not having the thick lines when zoomed in, and the very thin lines when zoomed all the way out. FFP on my target rifles though.

I found the Bushnell ballistics app for my sfp scope and am having a ton of fun shooting my .22 at 200+ yards. Crazy fun

Thank you for another great video Dan!

I think SFP is good for hunting scopes if you want under 20ish power. I have a 3-15 SWFA with a second focal plane milling reticle that I love as a hunting scope. If I want to take a long range shot, I just crank it to 15. If I need to shoot close, I have a full size reticle. I looked through a 4.5-22 lht and a 3.6-18 Mk5 hd the other day and didn’t like how small the reticle was on the low end. The Bushnell LRHS 2 with the donut of death seems like it could be a good compromise

Excellent video information I really needed to know Brilliant presentation This video is 10 out of 5 stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ I’m sharing this video with my family and friends and they will share it too So happy KZread pushed it towards me Thank you great 👍 work Best wishes from Las Vegas Craig I’m subscribing now 👌✌️👍

When hunting i like second as it's simple and you don't get confused. I do love the Leupold scopes with the zero lock for this - the simpler the scope in the heat of the moment the better. For target shooting or varmint then I'm all for ffp.

One of the best video reviews on KZread for guns and optic. I'd like to take your brain about long distance shooting. I live in North Carolina but hunting Kentucky if you ever want to make a trip you are more than welcome to come hunting with us on our lease.

Great video man exactly what I needed to hear!

Finally getting around to maven products. Love my maven products thus far.

Good video. My only thoughts are; Second Focal Plane rules when, target shooting with a 22lr, as it allows you to "frame the target" with the reticle to steady your shot. Also a half MOA at 25 or 50 yards is basically irrelevant. Also hunting at shorter ranges under 5X as the FFP reticle becomes too small to use any subtensions anyway, and too faint to be useful in low light. For most high powered hunting rifles it only makes sense if you shoot beyond 250 yards with a 5-35X56. Your mistakes will happen between 250 and 500 yards when you are at 16-34X. If you are using a 4-16X44 you will be using a dead hold out to 250 yards and above that you will be at the 16X anyway.

Well poop….I was backwards and I’ve got a VX6HD and 3 VX5HDs. Thought they would be better for long range shooting. Guess I’ve got a lot more to learn! Thanks for puttin this out there! Always enjoy your videos! And congrats on the school!!

@Inveniam22

2 жыл бұрын

Those two scope lines with the CDS caps are money. Don't fall into the FFP hype trap. Get Leupold to send you a cap for each scope, and learn to dial it. Super simple if you get the yardage cap and they work great. Never shot long range my entire life until I put a VX5HD 4-20x52 Duplex Firedot on my Proof Research Elevation 6.5CM. Was hitting 8 inch gongs at 1000 yards within 15 minutes.

I didn't understand this at all, and when I heard the differences, I thought "Why would you want a 1st plane scope? I want my reticle to be the same " After seeing the video, I am full to the 1st plane scope.

Mr. Harmer; Thank you for this instructive video. I do agree with you on FFP and SFP based on their particular use at particular times, distances, and purposes. They both offer pros and cons. I wish you and your spouse the best of all possible fortunes in your endeavors with the school you both are founding.

Got my like for both the content, the disgust with YT's stupid policy against firearms related brand recommendations and building your own school. Live long and prosper.

Thank you for the video, and God Bless with your new shool!

You'll have to keep us updated on your school! My daughter will be starting kindergarten this fall and my wife and I have debated about where we want her to go.

Best part of the video is around 8:37. Bravo good sir, we started homeschooling our basketball team worth of kids last year, by we I mean my wife.

Great idea! People are rebuilding this country based on great family values!

I use a FFP on the Vortex Razor 1x10 LPVO. The red dot at all powers is great especially at 1 power.

i like 2nd focal plane on hunting rigs as i typically keep scope at 3x always for snap shots and dial to max zoom for anything far enough away that i need to range, judge wind, figure drop, and get rifle supported for a shot (400+ yards). 2 hunting rifles have Mil/Mil SFP 3-21 and 1 hunting rifle has a mil/mil FFP 3-18 w/DMR reticle for low mag shots.

I shoot a lot in the off season with a SFP with a Christmas tree reticle. It’s a 4-16x44 with 1 MOA values at 16x, but I shoot almost exclusively with it at 8x so the values are 2 MOA. With practice, it’s not overly challenging to know your reticle at 1/2 power and full power and what the sub tensions mean.

Glad to hear your building that school❗♥️👍

Quality of design being equal, I generally prefer FFP, but for low zoom optics SFP is fine (such as an AR-15 recce rifle like the one I currently have a vortex strike eagle SFP on). For my purposes, If I'm needing to hold over or use my reticle to estimate range, I'm 100% for sure gonna be at max zoom anyway. So with proper reticle design & illumination, I find SFP is perfectly adequate. I agree with you though that for long range precision, FFP is preferred. Makes range estimation consistent & enlarging the reticle makes it easier for me to see and utilize my subtensions. Hence my choice of the Vortex Venom 5-25x56 for my budget LRP rifle lol. (I became a vortex fanboy after watching your binocular torture test & seeing them honor the warranty despite the destruction obviously being intentional lol. Being a lower income guy, my budget is limited but I still want a certain level of quality & product support, so I now have vortex on all my long guns. Have been very impressed with them!)

Thank u 4 taking the time. I didn't even understand the difference.

On any shot where I think wind is a major issue I've already maxed out my second focal plane anyway so adjusting for windage will remain accurate.

I really want to try out a dual focal plane reticle. I think you'd get the best of both.

Good info Jim. Question, your ffp/sfp recommendation appears to be reqarding powder burners. When using airguns the shooting distance is mainly less than 100 yards especially when hunting. The ammo is lighter and moving at much slower speeds. Would your sfp vs ffp recommendation be the same when using an airgun? My most powerful hunting airgun is shooting .25 cal 25.39gr pellets at 54fpe and 33gr pellets at 57fpe. Thanks

I'm a FFP fan. I've tried several SFP scopes over the years and I typically find the image quality at max magnification tends to suffer almost making the bdc reticle useless anyway. I found myself ranging targets at max magnification, then dropping down to 10x or so to take the shot.

Thank you for the great video 👍

You still can use retricle in sfp in different zoom - Just use math. If correct set retricle is for example on x12 so on x6 is 1/2 correct set etc. I used sfp scope and math to convert holdover on my airgun (so it is very big pellet drop)

@littlefinkle7757

2 жыл бұрын

Most, not all, but most do not stay consistent in the ratios along the magnification spectrum so that is not always reliable.

Agreed on FFP vs SFP. I have a SFP on my 22LR target rifle, cause I will be shooting at either 50 yards or 25 yards and I like the simple duplex reticle for that. On my "real guns" though, everything is either a fixed magnification prism or FFP. Reason is same as yours. If it has a BDC or MOA/Mil marks, I want those to be correct at any zoom level.

@robertboyd3863

8 ай бұрын

If I need to use the marks, I will most likely be on high power anyway , I haven't had a ffp in 60 and have no desire to ever have another

I really like 2nd fp in the 1-4 or 1-6 lpvo's too because the reticles look better at 1 power and any long shots you'll for sure be at max magnification where your reticle should work properly. Anything above 6 power I'd probably start trying to get a FFP scope.

@robertboyd3863

8 ай бұрын

I don't like a ffp at any power

Second focal plane is better for hunting. Most often you don’t have all this time to fool around with the elevation turret. First focal plane are better suited for long range target. I think the host is knowledgeable and is really trying to help. I’ve taken my share of game over the years. I’ve never seen a game animal wait for you to dial your in your scope.

German post illuminated! Awesome! I have this in Leupold VX3L , 3.5x14.5... I have it on a Remington 700 tactical , 20 in barrel in .223 caliber. I get .250" groups with nosler 50 grain ballistic tips, 3150 fps, My coyote gun to 350 yards!

I like duplex...but prefer german#4 or 4A for 2nd fp...draws my eye to the center quicker for some reason. Great vid...thx.

Good luck on your new school! ❤ Our children deserve good schools. 👍 Government schools are evil these days. Thank you.

For a 300 yard shot on a deer as illustrated in your video I would imagine you would have your scope cranked up to maximum magnification anyway so the hash marks of the second focal plane reticle would be spot on. Also the cap on the wind turret is there for protection against knocks when carried about. I have always had second focal plane scopes on my hunting rifles and with the help of a good range finder and good field craft in wind reading I always dial wind and elevation. I would never have enough time to rush a shot at 200+ yards so there is plenty of time to settle down and dial the appropriate wind and elevation. For long range hunting give me second focal plane scope any day

SFP scopes are way better for general use hunting in actual use, after using both quite a bit . People get sucked into FFP cause of the tacticool trendy marketing, forums, etc. If you dial for elevation it doesn't matter. Trying to quickly get on target with FFP at lower magnification in dark timber or low light sucks. Typically if you are adjusting for wind, the shot is long enough that you would be at max zoom anyways, unless you have a ridiculous scope with 30x zoom intended for long range target shooting competition

Had to pause the video after the bomb drop about building the private school. Way to be, buddy. That is so awesome. I wish it was closer to me so my daughter could go there when the time comes.

So I'm starting the research process to potentially purchase a scope for next year. I'm lookin to install it on a 10/22 that I intend to use for Hunting, Plinking, and potentially some rimfire precision competitions. Hunting and general plinking are likely around 50 yards, while I'm seeing that rimfire precision goes out to a possible max of 200 yards. With potential for a large difference in range from one use to another, I was hoping for a scope with parallax adjustment. I was considering the diamondback tactical, but it's an FFP, which I see is less ideal for close range. Is there a scope thats

When I got my first scopes in the early 60's ffp was all they had and no one them for hunting , soon the problem was cured with 2nd focal plane's . and cured the many problems of the ffp , for hunting the 2nd is always best , and also for long range target shooting also , with ffp at low light and up close the crosshairs will be hard to see, if you can see them at all on a long range small target they will cover up the target . They used to have a Lee dot that was popular it was a perfect night poaching scope as the dot was quick to use under the light

That mountain looks awfully familiar hahaha. No idea you are local. That’s awesome. What a trip.

Good explanation, good job

Got to agree with most everything. However I really like the Swarovski BRH reticle in second focal plane over a standard duplex. It's basically a mill dot with half mill lines and one wind mark. I have one in 3-10. Zeroed at 50 and basically dead on anything to 200yds. Anything over that I'm going the full 10x and it's markings are correct. It easily stretchs out to 450yds in my backyard. In a blind I prefer using holdovers as it's to dark to see and read dials expecially in low light.

@JackManiacky

6 ай бұрын

I have one of these on an AR15. I want this reticle in almost every scope. It's a perfect blend with mils and wind holds. The thickness of the reticle is perfect. It is so fast to shoot. If I could change anything, I'd add some mil hashes along the main horizontal crosshair, and I'd like it in a scope I could dial when shooting past 500 yds. Basically throw this in a Nightforce NXS 2.5-10x42 and I'd be a happy camper.

When you mentioned about building a school. Just made channel that much better. Cheers

Fun topic, SFP for 1-6x, FFP for precision, that's how I roll!

Will you/have you by chance gotten your hands on the Vortex LHT 4.5-22x50 FFP? I've been extremely interested in it, and there aren't too many in depth videos on it, and I greatly value your opinion

I have a scorpion toxin 3 to 24 x 56 SFP duplex, reticle it is an amazing scope super clear would be cool to see a review on this from you

Been watching for several weeks now. I just hit the sub button at 9:36 in.

Very good your video. I like to watch. Thank you from Germany 🇩🇪

The scope on my Grendel is a 2nd plane with subtensions. BUT it has a 200 yard zero, despite the somewhat rainbow arch from a 16” barrel. The result is I would only ever use hold overs at max zoom (9x) anyway. Gets me out to 500 without dialing.

@timl8302

Жыл бұрын

I have the 6.5's main competitor. Max expansion with a very good bullet is300-325ish out of a 16" barrel. With an 18" another 25 yards depending on minimal expansion of the bullet.....Oh, almost forgot. I use a SFP 3x-9x. 1.5" at 100y should get me at a 200y zero.

Very interesting and informative thank you

Awesome! what's your opinion on LVPO scopes for terrain like British Columbia, would u use one and which ones do you like? I'm looking at Burris and Steiner

I own and use both SFP and FFP interchangeably. The point about only having a duplex reticle on a SFP really only applies to beginners and the uninformed. Knowing the relationship of reticle subtension and magnification can be very useful. It just requires some homework and practical application knowledge; something that all hunters should strive for anyway.

0:25 Hey, go easy on me man-I’m no rocket scientist. I just know my boom stick goes boom.

I prefer 2nd focal plane. On an NXS, I have a fine crosshair with very small dot, with no marks or anything in my view. I have both, but especially when shooting long distances, such as 752 yards, I will be more accurate by clicking. The left or right is easily determined. On 42 power it is easy to judge small distances without using marks. Only drawback with fine ch is when getting dusk the reticle becomes hard to see, but It is illuminated and is visible even when dark.

thanks for explaining

SFP for me. I don't find the zoom adjustment as that big an issue. SFP are usually set to function at max zoom, so that's where I shoot from. If the animal that close that max zoom is making it hard to shoot, then I'm not going to be adjusting the shot. As a caveat, I hunt 300yds max. The vast majority of my shots are in the 100 --> 200 yd range. The SFP is basically "perfect" size for me when I hunt. That's the important factor and is discussed near the end of the video. Setup for what you typically hunt.