There’s A Parallel Universe Running Backward In Time, New Research Suggests 🤯 : kzread.info/dash/bejne/q36Cl6uIeJm1Zdo.html

@genostellar

9 ай бұрын

More like assumption suggests. There is no information there that any parallel universe even exists, let alone what direction time runs in. All we've noticed is particles behaving strangely and we don't yet know why, or we have mathematics of things we haven't discovered, or a lack of particles or observations we think should be there. So lacking the evidence, we make fun guesses that have nothing to do with research.

@demonkingrimuru7844

7 ай бұрын

Tenet movie

@depthsofmathematics5991

6 ай бұрын

CPT symmetry conservation and Feynman-Stückelberg-Interpretation of antimatter's time evolution do hint at the existence of a parallel ( anti- universe) evolving backwards in time. I wrote an informal paper even before physicist Neil Turok (2019). I thought it was just a mathematical artifact, but it's getting a lot of traction these days.😅😅.

As someone with two degrees in Physics this has to be the most mauled up explanation I've ever heard. Light does not "bounce off electrons", to pick out just one claim.

@brandonbennett4970

Жыл бұрын

This is clearly a simplified explanation made for a non-scientific audience. If you want more detail I encourage you to read their paper.

@ToothbrushMan

Жыл бұрын

@@brandonbennett4970 Simplified? It's just wrong.

@MiffetBlue

Жыл бұрын

The information running around in your head must be amazing!! I made it through high school senior physics by the skin of my teeth (and I’m left handed), I can only imagine the information running around in your brain. I have to say though that I aced chemistry and biology. Helped me to become a nurse. ⭐️🍀

@Littleprinceleon

Жыл бұрын

Compton effect?

@ToothbrushMan

Жыл бұрын

@@Littleprinceleon The Compton effect can be modelled as a billiard ball type collisions. Energy and momentum laws dictate that they will have to behave like this. But this is not how EM radiation interacts with electrons.

We aren’t actually taking a photograph of light nor quantum mechanics “directly”, at two levels. First, as @Donhamai notes, the picture is itself is a visualization of the data captured by the electron microscope and shown in a way that logically depicts what we believe the science is/should be behaving. Second, the electron microscope’s data is from the electrons bouncing off the light, which is itself “captured” or standardized in a manner (on/in the wire) that eliminates other possible impacting variables. In the experiment they validated via other means that the experiment itself wasn’t messing with the data (as much as possible), but the design of the experiment is by necessity a way to capture “photographically” what we believe is happening at that scale.

@woodstockjon420

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly, and thank you.

@KingJames61

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks 🤓

@2ndNerwin

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed

@gixelz

2 жыл бұрын

are you saying because we interacted with the wave via electrons, it collapsed into something that normally wouldn't "look" like that, in order to photograph it? my limited knowledge told me this clip wasn't entirely true, but I'm still trying to learn.

@2ndNerwin

2 жыл бұрын

@@gixelz without these waves, we are blind. Even your camera.

Electron can't bounce off the photon...it absorbs all the energy of photon.

@friedemannwerner5606

Жыл бұрын

Actually there is the so-called Compton effect, where only a part of the photon's energy gets transferred to the electron. It's the basis of the Compton Camera used in astronomy and in some radiation monitoring applications. What you described is the photoelectric effect. But one could even say, that in the photoelectric effect the electron bounces of the photon. Does it really matter, that the photon gets absorbed in the process? Just looking at the electron it changes speed and in most cases direction because of the interaction - in some sense similar to a ball bouncing on a wall, although usually the wall does not stop existing after the interaction I have to admit ;)

@Littleprinceleon

Жыл бұрын

if you would state your comment as a question, it would be more valuable

@chinmayanandunk5031

Жыл бұрын

Do u know about electron jump

@joelrwo5974

2 ай бұрын

He said the photon bounces off the electron

Measuring a wave changes it, even through third party electrons, that's the point of Schrodingers paradox. So how does this make sense? How do you extrapolate that data from an electron? Doesn't it say more about how the electrons' energy has changed, rather than the photon? We already know photons and electrons interact, that's how you see in general. The opsonins in your eyes are proteins whose formations are dominated by electron orbitals of their respective amino acids, and the transfer of energy from a photon causes the protein to change and eventually signal your brain.

I have seen this Light with my own eyes...I wish I had had a camera at the time...Perhaps you can capture this on film?, but I highly doubt scientists could create this Light at will in order to do so. It comes to you, intelligent, and appears/disappears when it wants to.❤

Knowing how tricky the whole light wave / particle situation is, I would bet that what they think is going on, is not actually what is going on.

2015?! Why am I hearing about this only now then? I highly doubt that this is even possible!

Don't underestimate the value of this discovery. This is truly incredible

This is what cracks me up about scientific claims. They didn’t actually capture a photo of light. They used sensors to gather data and interpreted that data with assigned colors. Furthermore, they didn’t gather that data directly from light; it’s a generated image of a designed, physical activity between light, wire, and electrons. That’s like saying, “we took a photo of you.” And then they show you a drawing of you from a selfie you took standing in front of a mirror.

Wire? What wire? Made of what? What light? What laser? What wavelength?

@individual1st648

Жыл бұрын

those are accounted for in the research paper linked in the description of this short

That computer generated looking like a playstation 1 image is a real photo? Wow.

Must be it is important to know that the Avery photons whole power (hv) cannot be transferred at all electrons, maximum electrons are not get this power, so this electron can't excited from the copper wire string so the light electric work was not happen !

is that a photo of quantum superposition or two separate particle and wave of light ?

The moving light particles create the waves in space. So the moving photon creates a shockwave basically which Carrie’s it’s energize.

This has a huge impact in quantum computing !

That's quite the Quantum Leap.

Actually the visible optical spectrum is emited by particle source as wavelenght potential anulation process. By depending of conditions of even distribution in all directions each particle can act as emmiter independently and all particles together can act as magnitude emision due to absence of limitations in empty gravityspace as fully polar, based on the distance. So light is a particles defined by wavelenght only. Thats tha part of the series of the null physics.

This is awesome!!! I always thought that would be impossible!

@JeanFrancoisDesrosiers

2 жыл бұрын

Came here to type those exact same words. I've always been told (read) that was impossible.

@anmolkotiyal6272

Жыл бұрын

I wonder if it is

@anmolkotiyal6272

Жыл бұрын

Simultaneously wave & particle u talkin' about here

@deepspire

Жыл бұрын

It isn’t possible. This is click bait.

@MiffetBlue

Жыл бұрын

@@deepspire and you’re sure of this how? No shade, just wondering how you can be so sure that something is definitely not possible?

looks similar to secondary electron spectroscopy

so,a thin metal light on electron(photon and electron interaction) and under electronic microscope finally a pic

Now we can observe Quantum Mechanics Directly Schrodinger: **Sweating Profusely**

So just to take a photo of the light that big and complex machine are built?wow

But how is it possible looking at the collapse of the wave function?

Thank you so much for uploading the video

So light can get trapped inside metal ? I haven't heard that until now . I have heard of reflection refraction but not of trapping inside a solid opaque object

@maya_void3923

Жыл бұрын

This explanation is totally wrong

@switchjim

Жыл бұрын

I think the explanation suggest the specific light they used had a parameter they specifically matched in the wire, so as to create a condition where the parameter existed in some sort of nondestructive resonate state they could shoot with an electron microscope

light looks like a mobile phone being pulled apart

The particles just travel in waves. The speed is where the confusion sets in for our sensory organs.

"you can't see things as smalls as electrons" Really?! people need to see this

Just a question,can inelastic collision help us take picture of light?

The photons don't look as if they are part of the wave. If this is correct, the way I interperate the photo is that the photons aren't the wave, they're riding it. This would mean there is a photon wave field which would further show that single photons going through the double slit experiment, one by one, don't need to be probability waves to make a wave pattern on the back sensor. It still doesnt explain why observation of the photon before entering a slit cancels the wave pattern on the back sensor but nor do probability waves.

Some accept they don't know , some r good at pretending they know

@Yourbrother05

Жыл бұрын

some are keyboard warriors

@ventiankraus980

Жыл бұрын

This.

@louisrobitaille5810

Жыл бұрын

WOS is among the pretenders 😑

Electrons be "bouncing off" on photons.... I'm just a pass out from school and even I kniw better

This has to be among the most important discoveries of our time and maybe ALL time.

As someone with no degree or understanding of any of this, I must say, all of this continues to make no sense to me.

Amazing!!!

@TheWorldOfScienceCo

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

Wasn't the impossibility the measurement of position and speed at the same time.

how can we say photon is in he bottom whe amplitude is high of wave and density of particle should be higher there

talk about outclass. sheeshh.

Just now studying Dual nature and i got to see the practical. Thank you..

Me: oh, no I inhaled chlorine! My lungs: *fucking drown themselves*

Science is marvellous

I am sure there is a more important experiment to go with that... oh yeah the ION drive...

All of this looks like fever dream

That’s funny, that’s exactly how dielectricity works

Really clever and amazing way to capture them

But the electrons bouncing off should change the behaviour of the photons. I don't think quantum mechanics can be measured/visualised without changing the quantum state.

Why did the photon not carry any luggage? Because it's traveling light.

What about space time because light is constant

So basically, they took a "picture" of light using electrons as the signal medium instead of light. Almost kind of like an electric lithograph. So, how can we go to the next step and take a photo of electrons? (We can't. For now.)

@maya_void3923

Жыл бұрын

This video is utter bullshit

Everything depends on the interpretation of the data when objects are that small but let's presume the interpretation is correct and that photons have dimensions as theorised. It stands to reason that they therefore strike an object in a sequential way to refract or reflect. Photon dimensions also lends itself to the notion that they have variable mass according to their wavelengths and that they actually travel faster than their straight line speed due to the wave nature of their travel.

This does not prove particles are also waves, it only proves that particle trajectories are waves.

Your voice matches to the kootrapalli from TBBT

Where is Ant-Man when you need him to confirm🤔

Technically it was not a Photo.

But electron absorb photons so how do they bounce off?

Whenever and wherever if I saw anything about light and photon it is always demonstrated and displaced as a round shaped. Well, actually photon has no fixed shaped it is like a thin stick and sometimes it can even change due to the speed it travels. So, always demonstrate it properly. But the project of capturing is damn awesome, definitely deserve a nobel prize

@Littleprinceleon

Жыл бұрын

a wave-packet as a thin stick?

@umagovindarajan4339

Жыл бұрын

@@Littleprinceleon yup it will be like thin lines passing through...

They're quanta from the photons.

Heisenberg Uncertainty principle left the chat....

anything that has no mass will always travel at the speed of light

yay such mind blowing things

but wait, how can photons bounce electrons back when light doesn't really interact with physical things?

25i-Nobme out of all psychedelic tools i studied under. was by far the most efficient in quickly bringing about a depth perception equally visable in the collective quantum field with no distortion from past present future memory's beliefs n trauma. . Everything vibrating and fluctuating within a bandwidth of its own. Depending on how still and relax one could bring there minds function of defining and interpreting. One could witness the light wave functions of photon light. Exactly as explained by the ones studying it with hi tec machines It sure is a blessing to witness. Ever better were the days I learned to interact n learn the language. Eventually becoming a quantum field programer. Making oscillating functions of different intent. Id make an off n on switch that allowed me to 3D paint so to speak. Unfortunately I learned to fast not understanding universal laws and rights to space n time. Let's just say I got a visit from both sides, with great power comes great responsibility.... Good thing it was a dream....🛸....🚁... I think,,,🤫🤐🧙

@artthehuman2457

Жыл бұрын

Oh yah... Don't do drugs. Them there is bad forZ yauh

It's still indirect tho right? You're only capturing the behavior of the electrons not the light itself.

You can't see quantum particles When you see it its particle When you don't see it it's a wave

@MonetILU

Жыл бұрын

It's not that simple

did these people just bypass the uncertainty principle...

This is illuminating! Thank You So Much! 🕯

You guys actually, finally did it! Bravo!

Is this real?! If so this is truly amazing and should get a Nobel prize. If they didn't get one id be very surprised!

@someoneunknown3434

Жыл бұрын

This is known as photo electric effect, Albert Einstien was the one who articulated this theory and received a nobel prize in 1921.

@angryyoungman4389

Жыл бұрын

I doubt it

@otherpurpose7005

Жыл бұрын

​@@someoneunknown3434 Albert Einstein always coming in clutch Am I right?

@markoer

Жыл бұрын

No it’s not. It is not happened how he described it.

@anmolkotiyal6272

Жыл бұрын

@@markoer same I also think so

If anyone has the reference to the paper, it would be greatly appreciated

Awesome

I understand the issue at a high level and Thank You for posting this and the article referenced. I wish I could understand the image better in regards to showing the wave, particles and does a probability wave fit in here somewhere?

it's a great breakthrough and much more accurate but it's still not light, it's the interpretation of electron interaction.

It's funny how he sounds like Raj Koothrappali from The Big Bang Theory

if we could seperate heat and light compnent, or spererste thermins and phitins, the outputs of solar panels could be raised!!!

Just wow

I didn't understand any single word except for the fact that they are trying to take some damn picture of some damn light 😭

@MeMe-ck5kl

Жыл бұрын

Read the subtitles, if u cant read so fast and u r DAMN SO SLOW, just pause every words and read it. Dont be so dumb

Game changer

That narrator sounds like Rajesh Kuttrapali from BBT

do we finally access to the quantum's territory

WOW! Very interesting. Ty for the share.

@TheWorldOfScienceCo

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching our video ❤️

@ikilledaman

Жыл бұрын

It’s misleading, be careful. Quantum mechanics is misrepresented here.

how can they fired electron

Let’s Come Back to This.

it's not electron microscopes, its scanning transmission electron microscope.

Photoelectric effect??

Fascinating...

That's how you time travel the wave is time

INTERESTING.! So WHERE is the PICTURE...?!

@zealotdraws3017

Жыл бұрын

That is the picture lol it’s more of a graph reading visualized

So can we see a short movie of the double slit now?

Best ever! The nature of wave/particle duality and energy come in packets

@kallah4999

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, that energy packet is what we call a photon, a particle. It's the wave like nature that's been a problem to directly image. They photographed the electrons and calculated where the photons were at the time the electrons hit the particle/wave, giving a direct image. Still a paradox.

@mrdownboy

Жыл бұрын

It’s a graphic from data, not a picture.

@Littleprinceleon

Жыл бұрын

​@@kallah4999 while the wavefunction evolves: it's wavy, where the energy is transferred: it's localized

@maya_void3923

Жыл бұрын

@@kallah4999 they did not photographed it tho

Not sure this shows the particle nature-wave yes, but particle-not sure

Photoelectric effects

Doesn't that violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle !

Call the Heisenberg!

It's a mock up. Like saying you can see New York City though the window on the set of the Late Show. What he says at the end should raise a red flag.

@maya_void3923

Жыл бұрын

Because while video is bullshit

Is that Rajesh from the Big Bang Theory?

so what's the source?

"Koi Mil Gaya" did this before 2015 with the computer they had to communicate with Aliens👽

Rajesh koothprali speaking through condenser mic

That's why we still have inefficient solar cells