Background videos: Wave collapse and decoherence: kzread.info/dash/bejne/qYx-m8eKZ9S6gc4.html Intro to quantum fields: kzread.info/dash/bejne/nKB50diwdZTVeKw.html Wave "collapse" interpretations - Copenhagen vs. Many Worlds: kzread.info/dash/bejne/gZ6mp9edocrAYbA.html

@anon-san2830

2 жыл бұрын

Seriously man, way too early to post a premier in subscription feed.... Few hours are fine at max. Just pointlessly occupying my feed... Annoying. I guess nice video and will watch it but this is super annoying

@sblovalbe1

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! I can't wait for the next one :) We need more videos, and even longer if possible.

@timkbirchico8542

2 жыл бұрын

excellent vid. we are density focus points in this field of energy . DNA and consciousness is an expression of this field of energy which we call spacetime .

@babyoda1973

2 жыл бұрын

I love it it makes my brain all fuzzy

@Blackmark52

2 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't it be simpler to explain that probability defines existence? A point in the quantum field that meets a certain probability manifests a particle, -any- all proximal probabilities are multiplied. A grain of sand doesn't blink in and out of existence because it is the product of an infinite number of high probabilities in the quantum field.

I asked whether light is a particle or a wave to my high school physics teacher. She just said both and moved on. I finally got a satisfactory explanation 32 years later. Thank you because your video satisfied my curiosity.

@marian-gabriel9518

2 жыл бұрын

Here you go: kzread.info/dash/bejne/hXioo8pyedqtXaw.html

@jonathancamp7190

2 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately, I received the same type of answers when asking questions in the U.S. public school system. A good teacher, when asked these types of questions, should say, I don't know, but I'll find out for you. Or at least point you in the right direction to find the answer for yourself.

@charlesgallagher1376

2 жыл бұрын

That’s as much as the teacher knew. Do your own research should have been her answer.

@onedayapp3534

2 жыл бұрын

Refuses to elaborate further. Leaves

@mikemcknight1295

2 жыл бұрын

And that's why she's just a high school teacher :)

I mean this in the most positive way. I've been putting on your videos at night to fall asleep to and they put me right to sleep. I love the education I get as I drift off into dreamland. Thanks for your hard work!

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Wonderful! I do the same with some of my favorite YT channels as well.

@tim40gabby25

2 жыл бұрын

@senor quak illogical conclusion.. like physics, jokes are most satisfying when they obey logical rules. Imho. Just saying :)

@krshna77

2 жыл бұрын

If you are still doing the selfschooling-before-sleep, please do pay attention to your dreams. The brain seems indeed to keep an eye on the last subject matter, and you may end up with very interesting 'revelations' as time goes on. I tend to doze off in my chair as I watch quality tubes like this one, and I've had many episodes where, as I'm sliding into the abyss, I get to visualize things in ways I would not normally be able to; or I suddenly make very visual, very easy connections between concepts, or come up with representations and permutations which I would never have thought of at wake time. It is often enraging a few seconds later, when I realize I can't really put into coherent words all the things I just "saw", and the harder I try to, the more I lose memory of the entire thing... But it's an amazing experience regardless :)

@jeremiahclay6602

2 жыл бұрын

@@krshna77 the explanation for why this happens is almost as bizarre and interesting as quantum mechanics itself! As you enter in to the first stages of sleep, your brain starts lighting up and doing what you could consider an Italian tune up. Fire on all cylinders! Once you hit a deep sleep, your brain dumps a chemical Joe Rogan talks about a lot. Your brain is physically connecting itself in the most abstract of ways that our conscious brain would struggle to do, so it finds ways to solve problems and make connections that are, no pun intended, mind blowing. I play music, and I always stress to people to practice right before they go to sleep. This is 100% why

@bri405

Жыл бұрын

Omg same. I love this channel and have been falling asleep to it and then rewatch when I wake up. Glad to know I’m not the only one!

Every time I watch a video like this, I feel like I'm dreaming that I'm entering an alternative universe. Then, I wake up and realise it is actually describing our very own. Very intriguing as always, thankyou Arvin.

@whatistruth560

2 жыл бұрын

U ever think that a Creator made these waves or our reality this way and holds all things together by the things not seen?

@athariqokazakiichiro5714

7 ай бұрын

Yes​@@whatistruth560

@coachhannah2403

6 ай бұрын

No, he is describing an alternate universe, the world beyond our experience. We try to make sense by by using visual/mathematical ideas we already have, but that world is just different.

Top notch. A great presentation of information without any dumbing down. I’ve been in the sciences for almost a half century. A thousand articles and video later, I still find the quantum world (reality) more fascinating than anything in fiction.

@The1stDukeDroklar

Жыл бұрын

That's because it is fiction

@WJV9

Жыл бұрын

@@The1stDukeDroklar - Hardly fiction when LEDs, integrated circuits, cell phones, laptops, etc. all use quantum mechanics to accurately design and manufacture all the microelectronics we use every day.

@YOTUBE8848

Жыл бұрын

*deBroglie's wavelength cannot be applied to large objects. It's only for quantum scale particles. You can't find deBroglie wavelength of a basketball like he did in the video.*

I've been aware of the double-slit experiment for about 15 years. I never really understood it. And when I would read/hear about the act of measuring something could affect the way a wave/particle behaves never really made any sense to me. Arvin's style of presenting is beautiful to watch. After discovering him today on KZread, I'm excited again about persuing a career in Physics.

All I can say is, “Wow!”. Arvin, you are the best hands down when it comes to explain stuff with such elegance and clarity. Thank you.

I have recommended this channel to many of my friends. Arvin Ash sir really explains the things in simple and interesting ways. I do not miss any video from this channel. Really appreciable

When Arvin says That's coming right now and the music comes i am like doing a headbang

@nerdexproject

2 жыл бұрын

I headbang every time during the intro too xD

@YathishShamaraj

2 жыл бұрын

🙄

@bobchelsy163

2 жыл бұрын

love Arvin he’s chill asf

@ferretappreciator

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah the intro music is a banger, honestly

@IemonIime

2 жыл бұрын

\,,/(>.

Good video. I've watched many videos about this subject but I still learn something new in this video.

I love the depth you go into these topics. Please keep making more great content like this!

Your videos redeem what the Internet was originally conceived to be - an equal medium for the exchange of knowledge. Keep it up!

@charlesgallagher1376

2 жыл бұрын

The internet is what you make it. It’s a tool that can be useful or a social nightmare.

@nadamuchu

2 жыл бұрын

this is highest and most well deserved praise I've ever seen on a video like this! Arvins videos have continued to improve leaps and bounds with each upload and I can't wait the next one. Thank you Arvin for making amazing videos that teach so much - and for ALWAYS having closed cations.

Arvin Ash is exemplary of an individual that has a deep understanding of the subject matter because his talent at explaining it in simple terms is unsurpassed. I admire your achievements in astrophysics Arvin, and I’m a devoted follower.

I’ve seen visualizations for the double slit experiments many times before but the way you organized this video and it’s sequence has allowed me to finally understand the information and weirdness in a way I can grasp. Even if it’s a simplification this video is awesome

The way you push us to think deeper about science and physics is better than any other on youtube. I love how you explain some deep and complex topics in such easy to comprehend ways.

Yes! I love how you’re not afraid to show some maths as to how these conclusions are deduced.

@schmetterling4477

2 жыл бұрын

This doesn't come from math but from observation. All science comes from observation.

Excellent video ,Arvin. You touched upon everything. The double slit experiment . Everything explained simply , succinctly and beautifully. I studied physics in college and Quantum mechanics and schrodinger's equation made me and many others break out in cold sweat . Why didn't I have a physics teacher like you? Great job 👍

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it!

"in the end, it ISN'T even matter" (as Linkin Park would say these days)

@thesoundsmith

2 жыл бұрын

I studied there: Whatsamatter U...

@nnikocarre-smith5633

2 жыл бұрын

Okay that was pretty damn good, ngl lmao.

This is way back to the basics. Ive seen much more vids from you about the more developped science, but these simple ones about the very bare essentials i allways like the most. Altough i (think i) allready know everything you told, theys still interesting. Love it. Thanks👍

@ioannisimansola7115

2 жыл бұрын

They tell us nothing new to worth considering

this video is mind blowing(so are your other videos, of course). but the thing that fascinates me more is how u explain everything so smoothly that i am truly able to understand and comprehend rather than be riddled with more doubts. its truly a satisfying watch.😍😍🤩🤩

Great video. I like when you recap some basic concepts like the double slit and add in some new things like de Broglie. I'm looking forward to the next video.

That's really great explanation sir. Thanks for sharing such knowledge with us. God bless you always. 👍👍

Absolutely brilliant combination of visuals and dialogue Arvin 👏. I don't have formal training but I explore reliable sources to acquire a greater understanding of reality, and you certainly help with that. So, thank you!

Love the way this is presented and the intro is an elegant example from macrocosm to microcosm subscribed and liked. Great channel!

So i started to wave to everyone i meet because they are waving at me in the quantum level.😄

@ernstgumrich5614

2 жыл бұрын

and the thin guy much more than the fat one!

@tanjohnny6511

2 жыл бұрын

@@ernstgumrich5614 😂

@marcogiuliocamurri

2 жыл бұрын

Did it matter to them?

What a great video. Looking forward to the next one.

Those 30 first seconds really blew my mind, thanks for that Arvin!

Excellent video, I loved the fact that you showed the relationship between formulas to explain , experiments, and a bit of history. Great novel you made.. wow.

Another great video!! It is so counter intuitive that the larger the object, the smaller the wavelength!? Interestingly, if the mass was not the denominator in the equation, with lambda=mv/h, then the results would be consistent with what we see in the macro world (bigger objects having lower resonance). Just a thought!

@yourguard4

2 жыл бұрын

dont confound "size" with "mass" :P

@LQhristian

2 жыл бұрын

@@yourguard4 Thx! I don't think I am. However, there does need to be a distinction between particle mass (energy) vs Macro object mass (gravity influenced).

From γ = h/mv if a body is at rest then it will make the denominator zero since its velocity would be zero. Doesnt it makes the wavelength infinite? And if it does, what does it mean? The same could be said for massleess particles like photon.

@GamesBond.007

2 жыл бұрын

It means that body is NOT a wave. And that quantum duality is illogical. And that Broglie guy got a nobel for being illogical and equating 2 energies which are not of the same kind: one is a wave energy, and the other is a particle energy ! He illogically assumes that waves and particles are the same thing and equivalates their energies. This is illogical, its like adding apples with snakes.

@tanayshukla9883

2 жыл бұрын

@Amit Kumar you cannot tell if anything is at rest without taking relativity into account. We should remember that motion is relative. And the body that you are considering at rest seems to be a macroscopic object as there is always some uncertainty in measuring the position and the momentum of "quantum objects" (see, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle). Coming onto the case of photons we take their *Rest mass =0* but since photons are never at rest they always have some mass given by de Broglie's relation E = hf.

@davidrandell2224

2 жыл бұрын

“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “,Mark McCutcheon.

@AmitKumar-nq7wk

2 жыл бұрын

@@tanayshukla9883 I got the answer from google. But thanks for your reply 😊

@frede1905

2 жыл бұрын

@@AmitKumar-nq7wk Yes, if a massive particle has a well-defined momentum (ie. it's not in a superposition of several different momenta), then using the equation a=h/(gamma•m•v), you get that the wavelength blows up to infinity if the velocity goes to zero. (a=wavelength, gamma=gamma factor, m=mass, v=velocity, h=Planck's constant). But then the question arises of how you'd make the velocity go to zero in the first place. Note also that the velocity here is the group velocity, not the phase velocity of the wave itself.

Damn! I knew it! Your thoughts and changes in vibrations can effect the results! Thank you.

@ArvinAsh

Жыл бұрын

Your thoughts will not affect the results.

The only thing that matters to me is the measurement problem. It clearly shows we’re missing something. Just like no one can explain the results of the quantum eraser experiment. If you measure the results the interference pattern disappears. Many try to say it’s because in order to measure the psrticle you collapse the function, but if you erase the measured results the interference pattern magically reappears, so that explanation is clearly inadequate.

@chetanpatil1654

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. It seems like a Simulation

OUTSTANDING Explanation 👍🏽 👍🏽 👍🏽 All is energy/light... We exist in a vast sea of energy. We are energy! So depending on your relative observation it is BOTH a wave and a particle.

“A wave packet”... I have not heard that before, thank you.

Particles and waves are concepts we use to explain how the math applies to things we have observed. They seem to contradict for quantum physics, because the concept does not apply for quanta.

Quite possibly your best video. Great explanation of something that is tough to get your mind around. Kudos

I know nothing about quantum, yet this explained to me how my focusing on things I prefer in my life over what I do not prefer, actually happens every second of every minute of every hour of every day. How I manifest my life...the good and the bad! Thanyou. I'm on a healing quest to create a cancer free body and this is a great help!♥️🥰

@djayjp

2 жыл бұрын

This doesn't have to do with that, regardless hope you get better soon.

@sidj2810

2 жыл бұрын

I think you’re spot on. Cause as Arvind also concluded.. there no particle.. it’s all wave..Meaning thereby reality manifests only on measurement/observation ie. how you visualise.

@cattailer1077

2 жыл бұрын

This has everything to do with it. It's not wishful the thinking, it is reality creating explained thru quantum and it is amazing.🥰

@cattailer1077

2 жыл бұрын

@@sidj2810 ..exactly👍🏽

@sidj2810

2 жыл бұрын

Yes..I suppose the brain activities are in quantum realm..also the reason we’ve learnt so little on brain upto now.

What a fantastic presentation of a subtle concept even a non mathamatician can understand .Great job!

@ioannisimansola7115

2 жыл бұрын

Nothing to do with mathematics , it is only the isufficiency of the human brain , a modern know-it-all considering its power above God.

Just ANOTHER *very* well-done video on one of thee coooolest topics ever! Thank you for being you, Arvin Ash!

You don’t know how much you are good in explaining things! If people want to know about nature, they should really stick to your chanell! Thanks, you are great Mr. Ash!

Felicitaciones Arvin, muy claro en tus conceptos, saludos desde Argentina

@mikhailbaalberith

2 жыл бұрын

Decime que se siente 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

Something I've started wondering about the wave-function, and the way it's "smeared" across space -- what if it occupies all of that space, and the probability of "finding" it is more like the probability of interacting with it? Imagine trying to track the location of slippery soap bubbles floating through the air, but the only tool you have is a pin, and it can only detect where the head of the pin is when it successfully pops a soap bubble. And maybe the bubbles are slippery, and if you poke them in the wrong way the pin may just slide by them without popping them. It doesn't *always* do this; sometimes it gets lucky and can pop the bubble with a glancing hit. But you can't tell the difference between that and popping it from a poke directly towards the center of the bubble. When you "detect" the bubble as you pop it, you don't know how it was oriented towards the pin; you only know where one point on intersected with the pin. So after a while, and popping enough bubbles, you can plot out the probability of detecting them... but this is really a map of where on the bubble it is easiest or hardest to pop it with the pin. And once you've popped it, the bubble isn't floating through the air anymore.

Wow this video was completely a mind blower. Really enjoyed it and keep up with the great work

If I am in a plane that is accelerating downwards at 9.8 m/s^2 then my normal force(weight) is been cancelled by the plane and hence I am at 0 g but will the force of gravity or with more complexity the curvature of space time caused by earth will still affect my age or will it still slower the acceleration of my TAU (time dimension) towards the future when I am at 0g.

the cap is a game changer !!.. Arv is communicating profound street cred !!.. We love you Arv !

I remember watching a video on the quantum eraser experiment. If I understood that correctly, the wave function doesn’t just collapse upon measurement, it also stops behaving like a wave if at any point in the future, it’s path will be known. As if the particle is reading the future and then deciding whether or not to act like a wave

@XEinstein

2 жыл бұрын

In essence that's how it does seem to work. However, one really has to contemplate what time is on a quantum scale and quite frankly, physics has no idea what time is. Or even if time is anything at all. We derive time from entropy and the fact that it always increases. Yet entropy and time only emerge as physical properties from large sets of interactions. A single particle travelling through space will never experience anything at all happening if it never interacts with anything, so what does time mean for that particle? So in the quantum eraser experiment time may pass for the observer, but since for the particle nothing much happens between being emitted, passing the slits and being measured by the eraser one really has to wonder how time factors in to that experiment.

@kidzbop38isstraightfire92

2 жыл бұрын

I know that physics can be unintuitive, but I really really doubt that particles are reading the future..or that they are aware of our intentions. I believe that either the wave and particle are different things (like Pilot-Wave theory), or we are not accounting for something.

@jasonbrady3606

2 жыл бұрын

@@kidzbop38isstraightfire92 I think Sean Carrol is onto something where there isn't a collapse of the wave function but a branch of realities. Thing is I believe our reality is tied to something deeper than the wave function of of free electrons. Meaning there's only so many realities that manifest with that deeper connection of time and history and continuance and only so many branches at any given node will exist. The infinite branches are there, but only some of those branches will be able to adhere to a reality that is tied to the beginning. Them other realities in affect lead nowhere, so we wouldn't see them. These things are deeper and are similiar to the electrons but tied up and compactified in other dimensions or scales that they themselves are tied up in ever deeper scales, only allowing certain infinities to occur. These quarks and subatomics are more steady and constant because the energies involved with them is much higher. Nucleus of atoms carry a high column force and do not change easily. Once they do change...suns, and all I nds of things looking for stability through the firmament. . Otherwise charging of nucleuses' are expressed through electrons and photons. These are the backdrop, black board that the electrons in our makeup flow with. The nucleus of atoms quarks, weak force, subatomics. When released they create photons and electrons... In this upper reality. With their many more multitudes of realities then as electrons and photons. Like aberrations of electron focal optical view. So I agree with Sean on this but I also think there's more to it, as I've said.

@thedeemon

2 жыл бұрын

Once you measure the position of a particle and its wave function "collapses" to a spikey one (delta function as an eigenfunction of the position operator), its momentum becomes maximally uncertain and if you run it further through the Schrodinger equation you'll find the wave function quickly widening to a bigger and bigger cloud. Such momentatily localized particle doesn't stay localized for more than a moment. (and it can't, of course, or you would know both its position and momentum with certainty).

@jasonbrady3606

2 жыл бұрын

@@thedeemon once it collapses? How did you see it before it collapsed? Only thing being seen is the spike and the probability.

Arvin Ash is a genius. Coz only someone who understands this concept inside out can explain it with such simplicity! This one is your best yet and where can I find the next one that you teased us with?

You always do a good job on theses videos. Thank u!

Hello Arvin Thanks for another amazing video If all quantum state are same other than upward and downward spin of two practice ,is that mean they are entangled? And do you think at time of big bang all quantum state are same If two practice are entangled is that mean time and space act same on that object although they are away from each other?

Our general ‘difficulty’ with grasping things at the microscopic level stems from our usual view of the world at the macro level. An object to us appears solid but that is because we are looking at it at the large scale - the interactions at the quantum level aren’t normally visible. We may think of an atom of iron, for example, as being solid (as a small ball) because that is how we experience it at the large scale, but it is only ‘solid’ because the interactions with the forces at the quantum level prevent us from poking our hand into a block of metal. As I understand, everything is energy. It it has mass, it has inertia and to change its velocity, it needs energy to do so, which also gives it extra mass.

@Thumper770

2 жыл бұрын

The only problem I have wiht this is the extra mass part. You can't have "extra" mass. If energy can neither be created nor destroyed, neither can mass. Mass and energy, despite being proportional, are equal according to Einstein. Equal means equal, If you can't create or destroy one, the same is true for the other. They are interchangeable and transferrable, but never gianed or lost. You can't have "extra" mass....or energy for that.....well.....matter. You don't so much gain one and lose the other. One is changed into the other. Mass becomes kenetic energy and potential energy becomes mass. The more massive you are, the less kenetic energy you'll have. The more kinetically energetic you are, the less massive you'll be....relatively speaking, of corse. The proton contains VAST amounts of potential energy but, almost no mass. While planets contain VAST amounts of mass but, very little kentic energy.

@ojonasar

2 жыл бұрын

@@Thumper770It is our perception of what mass is that gets in the way; mass is just a manifestation of energy. We experience mass as something that resists change in its momentum. If I’m jump starting someone’s car, I have to apply a lot of energy to the car to get it moving; as I do so, I am giving it extra energy and also mass. The velocity change and hence mass change is very small, compared to the speed of light.

@ojonasar

2 жыл бұрын

@@Thumper770 Planets have plenty of kinetic energy, given the speed and mass they have.

@Thumper770

2 жыл бұрын

@@ojonasar the point I was trying to illustrate but, failed to, miserably, was that potential energy + kinetic Energy / c squared = mass. There is no room for extra mass or energy. Mass is inversely proportional to its energy at any given speed less than the speed of light. The speed of light threshold demands that matter becomes energy 100%. We know that matter can not travel faster than light and still be matter. But what happens when all motion stops and there is no energy but, ONLY matter? Hmmm........

@ojonasar

2 жыл бұрын

@@Thumper770 All matter is energy; it’s our day to day perceptions that trip is up. When my older brother went to college to do electronics, I remember him saying later that in one of the years, they were taught how things seemed to be. The following year, they were then taught that what they were taught the previous year wasn’t how it actually was, and were then taught how things were (or at least closer to the way things actually are.) This doesn’t mean that the previous years teaching was wasted; far from it, it was needed so they would better understand the second years teachings.

I really think that you are one of the best scientific popularizers in the world. The way you explain, combined with clarifying videos is spectacular. I'm an engineer, but you manage to get me excited about ALL your videos. congratulations! Regards from Argentina.

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Glad to hear that! Thank you.

Amazing explaination! I'm in awe of how great this was. Several things just clicked. Thanks!

Time and time again Ash manages to teach on complex subjects in a way that becomes understandable to a layman interested in the subject.

So the first deep thought most of us had at 12 years old turns out to be kind of true.. Me at 12, "Dad, if I turn around or close my eyes, does everything disappear until I look?" So the universe seemingly behaves as if it were just a quantum ocean of possibility where any and every possible outcome is possible..

@ReptilesEat

2 жыл бұрын

Lots of things we thought when we were younger was true, we just got conditioned to reject that thinking

best explanation, best graphics !! Nice Arvin. Keep doing the good work.

I’m 22 years of age and I’m only now just starting to truly understand things

@Spartakus68

2 ай бұрын

Never too late !

Wasn't it Niels Bohr who told Einstein, "Don't tell God what to do!"? Ta.

@jasonbrady3606

2 жыл бұрын

Just looking at that name Neil's Bohr. Made me think Neil's women lost a hair extension and Neil had to come up with something quick. Cannot know don't know so anything is possible, if/thou it dose not make sense, thou it has driven people crazy. I want to know why the model where photons are a disturbance in spacetime? Where the positive peak of the wave is more than nothing and the trough is less than nothing, as in the entirety of the photon is these countering canceling virtual particles with a little more that propagates it into space. Essentially identical to gravity waves. I think the debate whether the wave is a disturbance of nothing or something is more relevant, whether there's a field, or just the zero virtual field particles of nothing. And an electron and its mass is a geometric topological affect that occurs as these virtual particles encircle themselves. So an electron is simply x-ray wave length of light twisted upon itself. That topological structure warps spAcetime, and the warping of spacetime is the angluliar momentum of that structure, directed and focused to the center of the electron, and dispersed throughout the periphery of the structure. The difference of angluliar momentum of any point on the periphery of the structure to the focused point of the center is its mass. We cannot see it's as a spin, but rather like a seesaw where the center fulcrum is the center of the electron. I think it's important as the root

This is what i keep thinking about.. There is no electron. Can't wait for the next video

@Mic_Glow

2 жыл бұрын

our consciousness is just a bunch of waves interacting with other waves also the universe might be a holograph on black hole surface

I wish I had a clever comment or even a decent question but my mind has been blown. Thanks Arvin!

Great video. My favourites are the quantum and space videos. Everything is a wave but the stuff we touch is of a kind of wavelength

@hyperduality2838

2 жыл бұрын

Waves are dual to particles -- pure energy is dual, potential energy is dual to kinetic energy or gravitational energy is dual. Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions -- matter or atomic duality. Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy is dual. The Schrodinger representation is dual to the Heisenberg representation -- quantum mechanics. The colour black is dual to the colour white -- all colours (light, spectrum) are dual. All colours are made from the same substance namely energy but have differing frequencies, same is dual to different. The lack of colour (black) is still treated as a colour by the human visual system. Lacking is dual to non-lacking. Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato. Everything is made from the same substance or energy but comes in differing forms -- duality! Duality: two equivalent descriptions of the same thing -- Leonard Susskind, physicist. Two sides of the same coin (heads, tails) -- duality. Monads are units of force -- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Attraction is dual to repulsion, push is dual to pull -- forces are dual. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of forces). Cause is dual to effect -- correlation implies forces! Thesis (cause) is dual to anti-thesis (effect) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (forces) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Forces are synthesized from the duality or correlation of cause and effect. Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Monads are units of force which are dual -- monads are dual. "May the force (duality) be with you" -- Jedi teaching. "The force (duality) is strong in this one" -- Jedi teaching. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality (energy) creates reality.

I have a question , what happens when the particle wave length gets smaller than Planck length ? Does this break physics or the is particle wave length unmeasurable in this case ?

@schmetterling4477

2 жыл бұрын

One would form microscopic black holes. But this is theory. We don't know if the Planck scale even exists. My bet would be that it doesn't.

@ezigwe

2 жыл бұрын

Basketball wave length is unmeasurable so suspect your particle will simply be unmeasurable too (and not break any law of physics)

@schmetterling4477

2 жыл бұрын

@@ezigwe Why would something like that be unmeasurable? Microscopic black holes decay differently from other quanta, the signature in an accelerator experiment would be quite unique (if boring).

@ezigwe

2 жыл бұрын

@@schmetterling4477 Not sure what you're saying. Basketball wavelength can be calculated but no tool that i know of exists to measure that length. Immeasurable

@schmetterling4477

2 жыл бұрын

@@ezigwe A wavelength is not a property that belongs to a single quantum, to begin with. If that is what you are after, then you don't understand the physics, at all.

Once again, a very comprehensive video! A couple of thoughts. Are the pattern varations in the double slit experiment not a result of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle? After all, without the detector, we get a wavelike pattern and can infer information about momentum, since we gain info about wavelength. When a detector is being used, the particles interact with the detector and we gain info about location, which comes at a sacrifice of info about momentum. Another thought this video raised is when you mentioned that the universe is essentially discrete, that it exists of discrete energetic quanta. Framing this in the concept of spacetime, I cannot help but think that it is exactly these discrete energetic interactions that make time and space emerge as a phenomenon. If we would assume that the entire universe is 1 discrete event, it would appear continuous within itself, no? A had a discussion a while ago about how everything we appear to see in realtime, and our brain interprets as a sense of now, is an illusion if we look at the quantum world. Light needs to travel a certain way to reach our retina’s, and then the translated electrical signal has a distance to cross to the occipital lobe in our brains. So our sense of now is built on information that is essentially always a perspective on how whatever we look at was a certain moment in the past, dependent on its proximity etc. Now, whether it is sunlight bouncing from a basketball to reach our eyes, or bouncing from hydrogen clouds hundreds of thousands of lighyears away, the event where the photon hits the retina is the only real event that matters. That is to say, it is the first contact of that photon from the time of its emission to its absorption by a cone or rod at the other side of the retina. The entire route from the moment it was emitted to the moment it is absorbed is a continuous path, and its alpha and omega are the only discrete endpoints of that continuous path. So in essence, the sense of time emerges exactly in discrete energy transferrences, the moment inbetween is experienced as a ‘timeless’ continuous state. We know there is a relation between mass and the experience of time passing, and that a photon experiences no time passing during its travel from emission to absorption. Extrapolate that to all known particles and you could state that any discrete ‘particle’ behavior is the result of an intersection between continuous ‘waves’ of energy, where a certain energetic treshold is reached creating a discrete moment of spacetime in which the timelike behavior of momentum crystallizes in spacelike behavior of location. I don’t know if I’m making much sense. But the TLDR or take away is that I feel like discrete interactions are what generates a sense of time, or at least a difference and relativistic contrast between mathematical regions where a lot of discrete interactions are packed close together (massive objects), versus mathematical regions that are much less densely packed (the vacuüm) where energy experiences spatial topography as close to 0, and temporal topography as close to 1.

For those who didnt get the point of the video, this is saying that we have no clue about what is mass and what is a particle.

@chetanpatil1654

2 жыл бұрын

True, it hurts the ego of materialists😂😂

@pavolusak2488

Ай бұрын

The concept, presented in the "World of the rings" , "The Planck view of the black hole" , on the ResearchGate, gives the idea , what is the nature of the mass and what is the elementary charge. Both derived from the dynamics and topology of the oscilating electromagnetic pulse closed persistent (non dissipative) energy flux, in the form of toroidal ring.

Quantum field, I think, is what binds the universe together and depending on scale, also causes it to expand. In a way, it's like a landscape. Thank you for another fantastic presentation!

Alan Watts answered this question decades ago - they are wavicles.

Now I know that light is a wave. I can die peacefully😌

I wasn't aware that probability waves exist, however small they might be, for macro scale objects. Thank you for expanding my knowledge.

@thedeemon

2 жыл бұрын

But it's just a misleading calculation. If a body consists of 2 atoms each of them having wavelength L, whatever that means, the wavelength of the whole body having wavelength L/2 doesn't really make any sense at all, both atoms with wavelengths L are still there. This total wavelength is a number without any actual meaning. In actual QM and quantum chemistry we talk about atomic orbitals, they are electrons' wavefunctions and they don't get smaller when many atoms come together, and nothing with a smaller wavefunction or shorter wave length ever appears from combining many atoms.

Hi Arvin. If there is no time in the subatomic world, then the photons might appear to be fired through the slits one at a time but, as time does not exist at this level, they are, in effect, passing through simultaneously, hence the interference. Equally, when you measure and identify a particle, it could be that you are simply capturing a 'snapshot' of that timeless wave in time, i.e. our classical, macro time.

Dude! Much better than pbs space, for me! Perfect level 👍

Oops ! didn't know they're different son but I still bless myself.

Best description of quantum wave function I've ever seen. Length of matter's quantum wave length is inversely proportional to its mass, brilliant.

@benjaminkaufmann2482

2 жыл бұрын

The problem with this view is that the denominator also contains v (the speed of the object). That means, if the object is very slow, the wavelength becomes very large and even goes towards infinity for v->0.

I enjoy your videos Mr Ash!👍🏽 very short and informative. Keep it up!

For the first time, I have heard that even macro objects have wave function, though it is immesurably small. That is a revelation. There is a lingering doubt. Unlike electrons, photona or muons etc, a basket ball is made up of trillions of atoms. Each of them must have their own quantum behaviour. Is the quantum behaviour of the basket ball sum total of these trillion particles, or is the quantum behaviour of the basket ball independent of the particles making up the ball?

@mayankbhaisora2699

2 жыл бұрын

Yess even for larger objects. They can pass through a solid surface like electrons but for that to happen the possibility of the position of all the smaller particles making up the large objects must be beyond that surface but the probability of that would be incredibly low

Easy to answer: Photons and electrons aren't particles or waves, they are photons and electrons. Comparing them to particles or waves is an analogy, and analogies are never perfect.

@matterasmachine

2 жыл бұрын

So what they are? Robots;) discrete machines with huge amount of states. Almost Turing machine.

@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591

2 жыл бұрын

You have no physics for the words however.

@hyperduality2838

2 жыл бұрын

Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Waves are dual to particles -- pure energy is dual, potential energy is dual to kinetic energy or gravitational energy is dual. Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions -- matter or atomic duality. Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy is dual. The Schrodinger representation is dual to the Heisenberg representation -- quantum mechanics. The colour black is dual to the colour white -- all colours (light, spectrum) are dual. All colours are made from the same substance namely energy but have differing frequencies, same is dual to different. The lack of colour (black) is still treated as a colour by the human visual system. Lacking is dual to non-lacking. Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato. Everything is made from the same substance or energy but comes in differing forms -- duality! Duality: two equivalent descriptions of the same thing -- Leonard Susskind, physicist. Two sides of the same coin (heads, tails) -- duality. Monads are units of force -- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Attraction is dual to repulsion, push is dual to pull -- forces are dual. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of forces). Cause is dual to effect -- correlation implies forces! Thesis (cause) is dual to anti-thesis (effect) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (forces) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Forces are synthesized from the duality or correlation of cause and effect. Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Monads are units of force which are dual -- monads are dual. "May the force (duality) be with you" -- Jedi teaching. "The force (duality) is strong in this one" -- Jedi teaching. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality (energy) creates reality.

@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591

2 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 Duality is just hole/filler physics.

@hyperduality2838

2 жыл бұрын

@@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591 Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. According to Descartes your soul is dual! Making predictions to track targets is a syntropic process -- teleological. Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. According to Kant your mind/soul is dual. Noumenal (mind, rational) is dual to phenomenal (matter, science, empirical) -- Immanuel Kant. Metaphysics is dual to physics.

Woah, this made it so much clearer, but also now I'm curious how can everything be a wave... Thanks for the video!

@schmetterling4477

Жыл бұрын

Everything is not a wave. There is also cheese. ;-)

Teenage boy photon to his Mother: "Don't come in Ma, I'm interfering with myself!"

Great vid! You touch on Youngs interference and basic two split mechanics to a central maxima, but visually would it have been great to show a single split, and touch on quantum entanglement at this point?

Brilliant, as usual! Tops! Should be mandatory watching in science classes at school.

Hi Arvin! You did it again! Feynman would be proud! Can't wait for 2nd video!

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Much appreciated.

@krzysztofciuba271

2 жыл бұрын

Feynman's lecture on it esp. Einstein's equation is totally misleading and a lie! Feynman did not understand QM either as

So the smaller the wave length the bigger impact on spacetime? Because the more massive an object the greater curvature of space?

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, but no one has shown a direct connection between de Broglie wavelength and gravity.

@Ashenshugura

2 жыл бұрын

@@ArvinAsh Wow, that blows my mind. Thanks.

Very good video. Personally I believe that what looks like a particle is more a location in the wave where information (energy?) is passed from one quantum field to the other. This location is random and follows the probability function (i.e. the wave function).

Terrific video. Thank you 🙏

Your presentation is a duality of two weathers. Hat for the cold and short sleeve for the hot.

2:47 THIS is so mindblowing, I imagine everyone jumping out of their seats and howling like sports fans when a goal is scored Seriously though, it's so logical and obvious, why wasn't it me who figured that out!!

How about calling them a wavicle. Wavicles have a paricular probability field associated with their wave function, but measuring its location or energy means you can't observe it's wave like nature... And if you want to see it act like a wave... Well, you can't observe it's particle nature.

wonderful presentation, i wish i had a professor like you when i was in my engineer institute

Amazing video Arvin! congrats

Another great video Arvin. Looking forward to your next one as well, what is a particle, everything is waves? I can sort of cope with the idea that a particle is just a disturbance of a field, which appears to us as a particle. But what I struggle to comprehend, is how "solid" objects seem to persist for hundreds, thousands, millions, or even billions of years. Why doesn't everything just pop into, then out of existence again, like ripples on a pond, or the surface of the ocean? Clearly, I'm not a physicist, or I wouldn't be asking dumb questions like this. But it does fascinate me.

Great understandable explanations using everyday language and objects! Big thanks!

Has anyone tried the double slit with a curved screen, like a ball? I would be interested to see if the result would be an interference pattern projected onto a spherical surface like a movie projector, or if the curve changes the interference pattern entirely, and the more distant areas of the edge of the sphere somehow retroactively change the interference pattern on the surface of the sphere nearer to the slits.

@hyperduality2838

2 жыл бұрын

Double slits = dual split experiment. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Waves are dual to particles -- pure energy is dual, potential energy is dual to kinetic energy or gravitational energy is dual. Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions -- matter or atomic duality. Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy is dual. The Schrodinger representation is dual to the Heisenberg representation -- quantum mechanics. The colour black is dual to the colour white -- all colours (light, spectrum) are dual. All colours are made from the same substance namely energy but have differing frequencies, same is dual to different. The lack of colour (black) is still treated as a colour by the human visual system. Lacking is dual to non-lacking. Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato. Everything is made from the same substance or energy but comes in differing forms -- duality! Duality: two equivalent descriptions of the same thing -- Leonard Susskind, physicist. Two sides of the same coin (heads, tails) -- duality. Monads are units of force -- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz. Attraction is dual to repulsion, push is dual to pull -- forces are dual. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of forces). Cause is dual to effect -- correlation implies forces! Thesis (cause) is dual to anti-thesis (effect) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (forces) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Forces are synthesized from the duality or correlation of cause and effect. Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Monads are units of force which are dual -- monads are dual. "May the force (duality) be with you" -- Jedi teaching. "The force (duality) is strong in this one" -- Jedi teaching. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality (energy) creates reality.

@NeonVisual

2 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 You feeling ok mate?

@hyperduality2838

2 жыл бұрын

@@NeonVisual Positive charge is dual to negative charge -- electric fields. North poles are dual to south poles -- magnetic fields. Electro-magnetic energy is dual -- Maxwell's equations. Photons, light or pure energy is dual -- wave/particle duality. Spin up is dual to spin down, particles are dual to anti-particles -- the Dirac equation. The inner or dot product is dual to the wedge or cross product (forms) -- Maxwell's equations. The Einstein dualities:- Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time dilation is dual to length contraction -- Einstein, special relativity. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Gravitation is dual to acceleration -- Einstein. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter -- "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry. Gravitation or curvature is therefore dual or gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. There are patterns of duality hardwired into physics, mathematics & philosophy. In physics the question becomes what is dual to entropy? Syntropy (prediction, projection) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics. Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). Signals are dual to noise -- the signal to noise ratio in electronics. Randomness (noise, entropy) is dual to order (signals, syntropy, patterns). Unpredictability (uncertainty, entropy) is dual to predictability (certainty, syntropy). Deductive inference is dual to inductive inference -- Immanuel Kant. Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. "Through imagination and reason we turn experience into foresight (prediction)" -- Spinoza describing syntropy. Making predictions is a syntropic process -- teleological. All observers make predictions to track targets and goals (objectives). Good news is dual to bad news. "Philosophy is dead" -- Stephen Hawking. Teleophlia is dual to teleophobia. Main stream physics is currently dominated by teleophobia -- philosophy or metaphysics is not allowed or is it? Questions are dual to answers. "May the force (duality) be with you" -- Jedi teaching.

Brilliant narrative Arvin - follow your videos, this one is one, top notch. I would suggest a video book, with links / portions of previous videos, organized into chapters - simply superb Arvin

Excellent explanation.👍👍👍

This is really interesting, I only started to take a more profound interest in physics and have watched numerous videos and "layman friendly" read on the wave function, and quantum tunnelling (among other things) a few weeks ago and this video more or less are affirming my intuition regarding quantum fields and the Unruh effect - meaning I get the sense there's no "dark energy" or "dark matter", just energized otherwise stable quantum fields into disparity. The ever increasing space-time distance is displacement caused by the quantum fields, and "dark matter" is merely quantized inertia. I'm sure I'm wrong on any of these assertions, it's just an impression that keeps building up the more I learn. To simplify what I mean is, imagine a big pot with water in a calm demeanour, it's all stable and unchanging. Place two rubber ducks in the pot at a fair distance from each other, they'll remain in the same position until something changes. Turning the heat on and letting the pot boil and the rubber ducks will start to move around, by the displacement of the water. Now replace the rubber ducks with something else that has more mass (but still floats), and you'll notice how much longer it takes to move around in the same manner. The representation is: The boiling water is the quantum fields, and the increased mass is the quantized inertia.

Great video!!

Arvin is the best at explaining tough concepts !! Just a thought on the macro objects vs atoms. What if it is not just about the wavelength but also about the wave phase i.e. in a grain of sand we have millions of atoms and the waviness or the wave functions of these will be all over the place i.e. not constructively interfering with each other, just completely random. Hence there is no dominant direction or no dominant wave. Now take another object, this time water. We can force it to make its particles behave in unison so each atom's waves constructively interfere. So on a macro level we see a wave. Once that input energy has disipated the particles go back to random waviness and the net result is stillness of the water.

@schmetterling4477

11 ай бұрын

There are no particles. Nobody has ever seen one in experiments. ;-)

Hilarious: The frames in the mouse over preview for this video are all from the Magellan ad.

@ArvinAsh

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, unfortunately I have no control over what YT shows.

@HylanderSB

2 жыл бұрын

@@ArvinAsh Understood. I expected as much, which is why I think it's a bit funny. Here they are trying to 'help' and this is what they come up with. Oh well. I did enjoy the video though. It helped clarify the whole 'everything has a frequency' notion.

Thank you for providing these thoughts as food for the soul! How do you keep your mind from being blown?! Mine starts to 'short circuit' when I think on these things.

Finally an answer that i could understand. Thanks Arvin

Excellent explanation, Arvin.

Great video! Would love if you could provide a video on delayed-choice quantum-erasure experiments, and what is really occurring in those experiments. I think that those experiments are the most bizarre of them all, and their results the most confounding.

@A_Stereotypical_Heretic

2 жыл бұрын

Lol why?