These videos are fantastic. I like how he just keeps it real with no BS. The subtle humor is well delivered too.

@ExplainingComputers

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Great Video as always, i really like how much Details you Show us and Point to the fine Details ^^ Continue your work please !!

Great job as always. Your channel has become my favorite source for information about computers and hardware, thank you for your contribution. I wish I found your channel earlier but now that I have I am having fun digging in and checking out all of your fine videos. Thanks again!

I really appreciate your videos. They sort out so much of the confusion that derives from never ending evolving technology of pc's. Thanks for your work.

Always enjoying your videos, Chris.

Your videos are very 90's in their style which is pretty amusing, but they're very informative and concise nonetheless. Thanks for sharing! I'll have to look for this on motherboards when I build a new PC. =)

@yussef961

7 жыл бұрын

Daniel Turner yes they sound like a BBC documentary lol I like that

My newest addition to my sub list. Currently here - been binging Chris’s channel from video #1 for a week now ;) how I didn’t find this years ago is beyond me! Loving the subtle humour and straightforward presentations

@ExplainingComputers

3 жыл бұрын

Welcome aboard!

@sinsaru

3 жыл бұрын

@@ExplainingComputers thank you sir. 700k+ subscribers and you find a moment to welcome me. Truly appreciated!

Thank you for making an informative video. Also, thank you for NOT making it an hour long just to get to them important parts. Straight to the point.

3:11 PCI slot color matches the new 3.1 USB plug color. Conspiracy intensifies...

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+Breen Whitman Brilliant spot! Or maybe we were not supposed to realize . . .

@awakejake9296

8 жыл бұрын

+ExplainingComputers DUN DUN DUUUUUUUUUUU

@NicolSD

8 жыл бұрын

+Breen Whitman The is more to USB 3.1 than just the USB-C port or the color of the port. You also have to make sure you are using both a GEN 2 USB 3.1 port and card and a GEN 2 USB 3.1 cable. The first generation of USB 3.1 had the same speed as USB 3.0.

@doublebubleguy12

8 жыл бұрын

+Breen Whitman On my ASUS Hero VIII motherboard the built in 3.1 slot is actually red.

@Jupiter__001_

8 жыл бұрын

+ExplainingComputers Insert X-Files theme tune here.

A very good presentation. SOlid facts without the fluff that some manufacturers try to throw in. Whenever I tune in I always find something interesting to learn and enjoy on your channel. I look forward to your upcoming videos no matter the subject. Thanks.

Who remembers when USB 2.0 used to be fast? lol

@ExplainingComputers

7 жыл бұрын

:)

@Lord5oth

4 жыл бұрын

I remember when my pc had no usb to begin with lol

@MrDegsy69

4 жыл бұрын

Who remembers when file sizes were smaller, processors less powerfull and video graphics less intensive? Its all horses for courses.

@cyiabsalon9720

4 жыл бұрын

I remember when USB-0 was all the rage, and when displayed publicly for the first time, it failed big time. Why do I remember such stuff? Cuz' I had to go change my shorts and do some laundry, I was laughing so hard.

@charlesjsescoto

3 жыл бұрын

Until this current moment it's still fast, u just treat your mind because there is something faster, then the other one is slower now to u

It was so informative and helpful . Please do continue your videos! Thank you

Very good and informative video. Well produced. Thanks.

I'm not sure why, but your transitions and channel music remind me of the early 2000's educational videos I watched in grade school.. its weird but I kinda like it. :P

Imagine all the pc components screaming Come on ! You can do it ! at the USB 2.0 port and data bus.

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+XenoContact Fantastic! :) I will always imagine that now.

@mrnebbi

8 жыл бұрын

This comment kept me entertained for ages :)

@lordofthecats6397

5 жыл бұрын

Im sure in my computer their throats will be dry from screaming at my printer

another awesome & very informative video! Thank you Christopher!

I really enjoy watching your videos, very well explained, good job ! ;)

Great explanation and demonstration! Cheers!

I love your presentation and the way you explain! Very informative for a new tech guy like me

06:16 I could recommend making a virtual RAM disk that you copy from. That ought to help fill the bandwith

Great info and tips - thanks for sharing

Very interesting, easily understandable and enjoyable video.

Love your channel, thanks for the content.

I like how unboxing and product placements are smoothly integrated without missing a beat.

USB3.1 is a rev of USB3.0. Gen 2 is 10Gbs, Gen 1 is 5Gbs, USB3.0 no longer exists. USB3.1 applied to the Standard A, Standard B, and microB, Type C came later. USB3.1 did not increase power. USB Power Delivery is what provides the higher current. Rev 1 and 2 weren't accepted by the market. Rev 3, which was based on the USB Type C connector, has been accepted. USB Type C is the latest USB connector. Both ends are the same (no A & B side) and there is no top and bottom on the plug. USB Type C also allowed alternate protocols, and has been adopted by DisplayPort, rev 1.4, Thunderbolt, Rev 3, and HDMI is in the works. The design goal was for USB Type C to be the universal cable. The full feature Type C has 4 high speed channels, that supports 2 USB3.1, each requiring a TX and RX, or all 4 channels of DisplayPort. Those high speed pairs are specified for 20Gbs, which is why Thunderbolt 3 can operate at 40GBs, or a future USB 3.1, Gen 3.

@johnm2012

4 жыл бұрын

@ateb3 And it got even worse with USB 3.2. It seems they're trying to avoid the same kind of nonsense with USB4.

Excellent video.

Aahh this brings me back! I recall I may have found your channel by the video you did comparing usb 2.0 and 3.0

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+MrAsianadam Yes, that "Explaining USB 3.0" video from many years back has over 750,000 views now, making it the most watched on this channel. So I did make this video with that very much in mind! :)

excellent work mate! love it

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

Many thanks. :)

Quick, clear, and concise. Thank you.

Great Video chris

great video man. im an IT from the philippines and i love your videos. keep it up!

@ExplainingComputers

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks. :)

I subscribed For full details and classic explanation for 2019 and beyond

@ExplainingComputers

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the sub. Welcome aboard! :)

Dear Explaining Computer, thanks for an excellent explanation. pierre from New Mexico

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+pierre5325 Many thanks. :)

You're making high quality content. Keep doing that !

You are so British and so 90's but also very informative! Love it!

@greghuffman3061

6 жыл бұрын

:)

@lawofaverages5373

5 жыл бұрын

I'd suggest So 70s even :-))

@herik63

4 жыл бұрын

The best part of British, i had britons colleagues and bosses, and I didn’t liked them so much, the last one fired me after 29 years of service.

I am a bit late to the party but just wanted to say I like how detailed your video is! I am going to check out some more of your videos for sure! subbed

@ExplainingComputers

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the sub, welcome aboard! :)

Awesome, I have been enjoying your regular videos. Tech websites have been very focused on the Type C connector, and I didn't even know there was a traditional 3.1.Do you think the traditional formed USB 3.1 plug will get much attention?

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+Rory S Thanks for this kind feedback. The Type A 3.1 plug and socket are physically the same as 3.0, though have to have different hardware behind them to deliver improved speed (and in some instances, more electrical power for charging/etc). But I suspect that they will not get that much attention as you imply.

very informative! thanks

I have the exact same 3.1 card and you inspired me to fit it to my pc :)

Thank you Sir, for sharing

Excellent Chris as always! You answered every question I could have had. It was great to see the test done in a real world environment. What the consumer wants to know is "Will this work for me?" and "what kind of results can I expect?" You answered both questions with great skill and knowledge! My only question would be if you were using typical hard drives instead of solid state would the transfer be slower? I am stuck for now in the world of 2.0 just because I don't have any hardware that requires anything better yet. I do use external hard drives but I am not moving large data to them at this point, however this would be a perfect arrangement to do a backup on with the use of an adapter cable. Thanks again, you got me thinking which is a good thing. So are you retired from teaching yet? I know you were going in this direction, I didn't know if you are full time now on your other goals? I appreciate all you do! Rich

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+MrMoonpie001 Thanks Rich. If I used a hard drive rather than an SSD, it would be slower -- the SSDs (one borrowed from another system, one about to go into one) were the fastest things I had available. I have now left the University of Nottingham as an employee, though am back teaching there freelance from next week for a few months. But basically, yes -- I am now full-tie on being freelance.

@MrMoonpie001

8 жыл бұрын

Good luck and God bless in your new venture, I look forward to seeing your handiwork! Rich

the reason you can't see much difference between USB 3.0 and USB 3.1 in your setup because SATA connection bottle neck at 6Gbps which means even USB 3.1 has 10Gbps connection speed you will only get maximum of 6Gbps.

@ExplainingComputers

7 жыл бұрын

You are in theory right, but in practice SATA is clearly not the bottleneck here, as neither transfer is close to 6Gbps

Hello, Thank-you for this Nice video. What is the real trueput of the sata adapter ?

Good explained thanks! =)

Great video! Thanks once again! USB 3.1 Type C will really be useful in smartphone and external GPU docks for up coming laptops. It's an incredibly fast data transfer socket.

Is it possible to connect 2 computers via a USB-C cable (and when what kind? Thunderbolt?)? So that I could transfer files like on to a ext. harddisc. Or to maybe even combine the processing power of the two (e.g. when I have Adobe PremierePro on both, to render with the processing power of 2 (or more) computers at once. Is something like that possible in a way? Thank you very much

What powers up the usb ports on the motherboard? I ask because my pc case doesn't have usb 3.0 ports but my motherboard has usb 3.0 and 3.1 built in on the back of the board. I only have a usb 2.0 wire connected to my motherboard but my usb 3.0 and 3.1 ports seem to work okay. But would they work better if I had a 20pin usb 3.0 wire plugged into my board header instead of the 2.0? It has me a little confused.

so with the c connector on one end the usb 3.1 male is on the other end right? what use is that can you tranfer data from one pc to another that way?

i have a next bit robin with a type c port. got to tell you, the charging time when you give it 2 amps from a wall socket is heroic.

Glad I found this for I have a 64 year old brother who said it is not worth worrying about 3.0 that it is not faster even though the PC I built him has 3.0 and 3.1 he will watch this even if I have to stand over him -- Thanks -- Also First 65 or Older

@tentimesful

6 жыл бұрын

europe needs suing illigal anyway, usb is garbage alwas breaks like hdmi sand in the middle.... europe for superior interfaces. like the old interfaces more sound interface, any company practically sueable in american copany

@tentimesful

6 жыл бұрын

train does get tracks of getting bigger in summer and winter smaller, does usb really fit..

@tentimesful

6 жыл бұрын

60 usb interface broken, just like tht...

@Novashadow115

6 жыл бұрын

tentimesful Dude, your English is severely broken. No one here understands what you are trying to say

@persona83

5 жыл бұрын

It seems he just doesn't like USB interfaces.

I have bought a similar card to fit onto my ASUS Z87 motherboard but the USB 3.1 card I got has external power connection which is always more ideal since it's more stable and can take advantage of USB-PD for compatible devices. Plus it has front panel connectors too for extra non power heavy devices like card readers, flash drives and dongles

Your channel is good

The method of the disk format will create a difference in the speed Disk part Fat32 with a unit size of 4k will a bit different to NTFS with a unit size of 16k

Did you test the transfer speed using the USB-C interface? I would imagine it should be identical to your USB 3.1 test results but I'm not one to assume. Also it's worth noting that though USB 3.1 has a max transfer speed of 10GB/s, the max speed for SATA3 is 6GB/s. Great videos by the way.

What is PCIe? Does it mean PCI express? I could not find a place to stick it in my Raspberry Pi 3. I think my old Sony Vaio has a PCI slot somewhere on the mother board, but I´m not sure about a PCIe slot. Thanks again for another great video tutorial. Cheers, mate. :-)

I'm just wondering that with a small form factor that the USB-C has, how much thermal issues are with delivering 100W at 5A and 20V. Even 2A micro usb connectors sometimes have problems at 2A, so I imagine some problems arising at 5A. Also, another question, since the USB 3.1 has to be downwards compatible, how does it switch to the 20V mode? I'm assuming it stays in the 5V mode unless it recognizes a specific 3.1 device and knows it can switch to 20V. So if I simply want to power something off the 3.1 port with 20V I can not do that with just a cable - I need to do the software handshake to get it into the 20V mode. Is the USB-C also compatible with this 5V mode or is it already 20V by default?

@ExplainingComputers

7 жыл бұрын

Very intereting thoughts indeed. On the voltage, I understand it, the USB-C spec includes a standard called USB PD (power delivery), which defaults to 5V unless two USB PD compatible devices are connected, at which point higher voltages can be used (eg to charge a device). There is a very interesting, related article on power and the USB-C (PD) standard here: www.androidauthority.com/htc-10-lg-g5-breach-usb-type-c-spec-688558/

You could do more tests, just create a white noise file directly on disk. Or try random access. Or copy from raid 0 to raid 0. For data applications this is great, can push a lot of sensor data through that. Also makes it really easy for connecting mini PCs on a 10GBe network. What is the latency of this?

Can someone please explain to me how USB 2 has a transfer speed of 480Mbps and USB 3 even faster but all I ever get when using them is something around 25 Mbps or so at best? I transfer data between an external HDD and my PC. Even at his own test at 6:39 USB 2 only shows around 25 Mbps....

Good stuff.

I was happy to see this because I recently just built a new super-high performance rig with a motherboard that came with USB 3.1, and until I got the motherboard, I had no idea it existed! I was even happier to see that the adaptor you got was ASRock, because that's who I got my motherboard from! It came with two USB 3.1 slots in the back, but I don't have any devices that can use them, yet. I think I'm most excited that finally we have a mini-USB that is reversable! No more playing guessing games with which way to plug it in.

@TalesOfWar

8 жыл бұрын

+Zepher Tensho There are a few pretty decent quality drive enclosures that use it for 2.5" SATA drives and there's a couple for M.2 that I've seen too. The M.2 one will make far better use of the connection, assuming it's the 10Gbit compliant connector of course. SATA is kind of wasted on modern SSD's, they easily saturate the bandwidth.

yes transferring data from disk to disk is limited by the speed of the discs and not by the USB three point one port and all that but could you run say two screens from one USB port? so if you had a laptop with the new standard and wanted to add a couple of USB to HDMI ports for some screens would it be fast enough?

Does this card have any limitations? For example, will it go into ANY motherboard's x4 slot or just one capable of something in particular?

@ExplainingComputers

3 жыл бұрын

A x4 PCIe card will work in any x4, x8 or x16 slot.

Can it be put in PCIe 16x and work? Is it compatible with USB 3.0/2.0?

Because a friend of mine keeps asking me to explain USB 3.1 Type C compared to Thunderbolt, which also uses a type C connector, I would love to see you do a video explaining the relationship between the two and why you can use USB-C devices with Thunderbolt. That way, when he keeps asking after I've already explained it, I can just keep sending him to your video.

Chris, another very clear presentation of USB options. In the future, you might expand your USB presentations by adding a discussion of the "frame" improvements that occurred between USB 3.0 and USB 3.1, which were very similar to the "frame" improvements that occurred between PCIe 2.0 and PCIe 3.0. USB 3.1 adopted what is known as the 128b/132b "jumbo frame", which transmits a block of 16 bytes with the addition of 4 more control bits: 16 bytes @ 8 bits = 128 + 4 = 132 binary digits per frame. Similarly, PCIe 3.0 adopted the 128b/130b "jumbo frame", which transmits a block of 16 bytes with the addition of 2 more control bits: 16 bytes @ 8 bits = 128 + 2 = 130 binary digits per frame. The prior PCIe 2.0 and USB 3.0 standards still retained the 8b/10b "legacy frame": 1 byte @ 8 bits + 1 start bit + 1 stop bit = 10 bits per byte. These comparisons can be important, particularly if USB 3.1 hardware is not controlled with a software driver that supports the new 128b/132b "jumbo frame". I believe the 128b/132b "jumbo frame" is defined as a USB 3.1 "option" i.e. it's not a mandatory feature of the USB 3.1 specification. Given the obvious bandwidth increase that results from increasing the clock from 6G to 10G, it's quite strange that SSD manufacturers have not at least adopted PCIe 3.0's 8G clock and 128b/130b "jumbo frame". This one change would increase MAX HEADROOM from 600 MB/second (6G/10) to 984.6 MB/second (8G/8.125). And, when PCIe 4.0 becomes standard, then MAX HEADROOM increases again to 1,969.2 MB/second (16G/8.125). Instead, storage vendors are steering consumers to the M.2 form factor and the NVMe protocol. Hope this helps.

@ExplainingComputers

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for this info. :)

I think you have proved the point that it is not really worth spending the money on 3.1 at the moment. Sure if buying a new motherboard then getting 3.1 on is fine, but not really worth getting a 3.1 card.

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+z I think that you are right! :)

Mr Barnatt!! Could you please make a video about thunderbolt (types, generations)? Finally, I would be grateful if you could mention 1) the different connections between thunderbolt cables-ports and mini displays cables-ports and 2) the different connections between thunderbolt cables-ports and usb type c cables-ports. Best regards, Stavros

Chris what if you tried copying from an NVME PCIE SSD via USB 3.1 into another NVME PCIE SSD? And what do you feel are the real world speeds of these connectors?

@ExplainingComputers

5 жыл бұрын

I imagine the constraint here is the USB 3.1 implementation on the PCIe card.

I know that this is a bit late, but Would it make any more of a difference if you were to remove SATA out of the equation and copy to an M2 ie Samsung 960 EVO

@ExplainingComputers

5 жыл бұрын

Probably not, as the transfer speed attained is well below that of SATA-3.

I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS KK

Is necessary a device (SSD o other) 3.1 for work properly?

SATA 3 is 6Gb/s. That translates to theoretical 768 MB/s. I wonder if Your adapter is the bottleneck for the SSD. Maybe do a video on comparing different USB 3.0/3.1 disk adapters? Did some testing myself a while ago and the difference between adapters can be up to 50-100MB/s. Great video as always :)

To add to the confusion: USB 3.0 is also known as (rebranded) 3.1 Gen 1 and USB 3.1 is also known as 3.1 Gen 2 USB C also comes in 2.0 and 3.0/3.1Gen1 flavors as well.

Good channel ..keep it up

@ExplainingComputers

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks, will do!

i really love your videos , it reminds me of watching tomorrows world when i was younger :)

OW, THAT WAS FANTASTIC, NOT THAT I COULD DO IT, BUT IT REALLY WAS INTERESTING.

(7:40) - Wow, That USB 2.0 is sooooo sloooow I would love you to now copy the same file(s) over USB 1.0 Go on, Chris. You know you want to...

Hi Chris, Your presentations are awesome. I have an older Linux system (circa 2010 with DDR2 memory). I have some external backup 7200 rpm spinner disk drives (WDigital) that are marked as Sata 6. Is adding the PCIE card for USB3 worthwhile if installing and switching to use the backups via that USB3.x if the drives are 7200 spinners? I would not ask that question if my backup drives were SSD's. I am of the opinion, the 7200 spinners are the items limiting backup and recovery transfer speed.

@ExplainingComputers

6 жыл бұрын

It is certainly worth upgrading to access any HDD or SSD over USB 3.x rather than 2.0 if you are going to be backing up any quantity of data, as it should be 5 to 7 times faster. It will not be your drives limiting transfer speeds. So if you are regularly moving, say, 10GB or more, worth doing.

@lsatenstein

6 жыл бұрын

Chris, Thank you for the very prompt reply. I am in Montreal, where the temp outside is -21C (-13C) in the sun. In the past two days, 30 Inches (80cm) of snow fell and which has to be shovelled. I chose to forego the snow shovelling to watch your videos. I believe I have my priorities right.

@ExplainingComputers

6 жыл бұрын

:)

I am so glad they invented the USB C connector, my backup drive has a worn out USB 3 connector and cable, not a very good backup at all :( Since it's only a little faster I am guessing it will work fine if I got a new drive and used it with the existing blue USB 3 ports?

Can you make a new video for 3.2 and usb c?

Have you done more recent videos on USB 3.2 and USB4? Not to mention the atrocious naming convention chaos that accompanies both?

3:24 or a small piece of Blue Tack on the screw head to hold it on

Magnetic connectors please! It takes about 6 months usually to kill those tiny ass connectors. At least my 3.0 connector lasted pretty long.

I have seen your vid on USB 3.0 and then this one. Theres a significant improvement in your presentation, video quality and in making the video interesting. However in both vids you have added in a PCI card which got me thinking; why dont they make USB with max PCIX16 bandwidth and be done with it (USB_Z)?

@ExplainingComputers

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks. My videos have indeed changed over the years! :)

Fun watching this in 2022 in retrospect

Since USB 3.1 can carry current up to 20V@5A. Could it possibly power a 3.5" SATA Hard Disk Drive through the SATA to USB adaptor you are using?

@ExplainingComputers

7 жыл бұрын

Through the adapter I have, no. But potentially a USB-C connected DATA adapter could in theory connect and power a 3.5" drive. A very interesting thought!

so if i charge my mobile with the usb 3.1 it will will get 20v instead of the 5v it should get?

what's the difference between the two 3.1 ports?

What would happen if you were to plug a (standard) usb c to usb c cable in two ports on the same device?

Because you have 8GB of RAM you are able to create a storage for 3GB file directly in RAM , so you can compare r/w speed of (RAM to SATA or RAM to USB)

Thanks for your response. Your results seem to indicate the your eSATA port is SATA 2, not SATA 3. Is it?

@ExplainingComputers

8 жыл бұрын

+datapro007 There is no use of eSATA here -- the SSD is connected to a standard SATA 3 port. I suspect that the PCIe USB 3.1 card may not be performing to the potential of the USB 3.1 spec.

Can I connect a newer peripheral with type C, to an older hub/PC with type A (2.0)? Everyone answers this question the other way around, with the type C on the new PC...

What I'm really looking forward to with USB 3.1 is the reversible connector and the larger power supply ability - the speed is actually secondary to me. Although I do wonder if my gaming PC could do a better job at pushing out enough performance to saturate the connection.

Lol, I was scratching my head about why the hell my 3.0 external HDD connector is so large then I see in the video it's because it has to carry all the 3.0 additional data lines, I thought it was so large because it consumed more power so it needed more pins!. Thanks for clarifying all my confusions. Cheers :)

@DrkTrx

6 жыл бұрын

The extra pins is for the 3.0 mode (SuperSpeed)

BTW, I do love your videos, I had never heard of a SBC before you. & I have been working in electronics - PCB manufacture mostly - from the early '70's. My first, non-specialized computer ran CPM, then later DOS, much later... then the OS changed so quickly... I remember when 8Kb was a large memory card, & 16 Kb the Max of the system... then later, with a S/W upgrade, 32Kb... now, I just bought some 64Gb USB 3 drives for almost nothing... home times change... in only 45 years... I wonder what the next 2,000 will bring :-)

@ExplainingComputers

6 жыл бұрын

The speed of change in IT is indeed staggering . . . :)

How about running Crystal against the SSD? Perhaps benchmark the same SSD connected via USB 3, 3.1 and SATA might be revealing.

A USB connector going in both ways ... witchcraft I say.

@trixiepettman-south8500

5 жыл бұрын

I BELIEVE IN WITCHCRAFT.

@herik63

4 жыл бұрын

After some years of lighting connections...

@AndyMcGeever

4 жыл бұрын

There are micro USB leads that go in both ways. I don't know why all micro USB leads aren't like that.

What about MCSe to USB3.1 speed run? Isn't MCSe very fast?

My motherboard has a usb 3.1 rev 2 header. My case has a 3.0 blue header that connects two usb 3.0 ports on the case. I purchased a cable that plugs into the 3.1 r2 header and converts that to a blue 3.0 male. If I connect this to the 3.0 case header will this give me two 3.0 ports? Is it backwards compatible?

@ExplainingComputers

6 жыл бұрын

You should end up with two 3.1 ports.

@Markinpuff

6 жыл бұрын

ExplainingComputers 3.1, that’s unexpected. I’m just hoping it won’t damage my motherboard. Never really saw this configuration before, Case : cooler master 5t,. Thanks..

can you do a video explaining the disconnect between usb 3/3.1/2 and connectors A,B and C .... for eg how does a usb 2.0 work when using a C type connector and is there an easy way to tell how it is wired ?

@ExplainingComputers

4 жыл бұрын

Now that would be a video -- and a rant! I may indeed attempt this.

@deadadam666

4 жыл бұрын

I would greatly appreciate it - thanks for your hard work

@ExplainingComputers

4 жыл бұрын

I have included some content on the mess that is USB 3.x standards in my video for next Sunday (3rd Nov). :)