"he made a radioactive wasteland and called it peace" - Genghis Khan about Gandhi

@bardbarbarian5313

7 жыл бұрын

ah so Fallout wasn't the fault of anyone but ghandis plan for world peace?

@spikemasterb2521

7 жыл бұрын

See, america couldn't tell where the nukes that hit them came from and assumed it was China. In reality, India had elected Ghandi as God-King the day before and he nuked the US.

@lomek4559

7 жыл бұрын

I heard that Genghis Khan was also a leader of Japan... LUL xD

@ottokard1243

7 жыл бұрын

Duke of Lorraine Why do I find you on every video I watch.

@pankman35

3 жыл бұрын

OMG

Gandhi: lets drop on them a 100 tons of peace.

@taurusjinx9694

7 жыл бұрын

Please don't spell Gandhi out like that... I really am disgusted and amused at the same time.

@georgesears934

7 жыл бұрын

100 megatons of passive resistance*

@ryansamuels534

7 жыл бұрын

Taha Sedjal q

@AydenMillersBohawks

7 жыл бұрын

Ghandi Ghandi Ghandi

@hamzasadiq7672

7 жыл бұрын

100th like

So happy that nukes are actually realistically terrifying in Civ6, as opposed to Civ5.

@fifthcolumn388

7 жыл бұрын

Baleur Except that there is no way to intercept them, unlike in real life.

@YusakuJon3

7 жыл бұрын

I was going to say. No missile defense systems? No "Star Wars" orbital anti-ICBM systems? Kind of makes it a bummer. Wait 'til the multiplayer trolls figure this one out.

@Demagoguez28

7 жыл бұрын

i like this. this makes scouting their subs or launch bases more important to a pre strike and makes nukes a deterrent as intended

@Aerroon

7 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure there are no known effective ways to intercept ICBMs. They are just way too fast in the terminal stage.

@hellsyus

7 жыл бұрын

Funny to see you here.

All hail Ghandi. Ghandi will be the peace maker... or it will rain radioactive fallout for years!

@witchofengineering

7 жыл бұрын

No Ghandi won't be peacemaker. He will use Peacemakers en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-118_Peacekeeper

@YusakuJon3

7 жыл бұрын

Definitely was thinking of Warmonger Ghandi with this. Especially the _thermonukes_.

@TheLinkinTALLICA

7 жыл бұрын

not even kane its so evil :D

@kd-hw2vk

7 жыл бұрын

The purpose of war is peace. The purpose of nuclear war is total peace.

@bestofmoh

7 жыл бұрын

kane lives brothers

Imagine if they add a nuclear winter and the post apocalypse

@tokkiemetuitkering8030

7 жыл бұрын

Where everybody has to rebuild their civilization but in a whole new way

@doom7ish

7 жыл бұрын

that would be cool

@jkahgdkjhafgsd

7 жыл бұрын

Ghandi would be the founder of Vault-Tec corporation spread it all over the world then nuke it

@ammytersau

7 жыл бұрын

+Fierro 4 DLC

@TheArklyte

7 жыл бұрын

Actually, wasn't that already in Civ 2 or 3? Pollution caused climate and thus the landscape to change and so on...

who said ghandi was a pacifist, he clearly loves nukes !

@gurukimci

7 жыл бұрын

'Peace bombs'

@MrASZHanazaki

7 жыл бұрын

Sure.....Everybody wants to be friends with the guy who can blow half of the planet *look at the united states*

@tchitchouan

7 жыл бұрын

Tayce Axel NUKE THEM ALLL !!!!!1111§§§

@taurusjinx9694

7 жыл бұрын

Please don't spell Gandhi that way... it sounds way wrong in Hindi. And is kinda dispresctful.

@Ben-dy4up

7 жыл бұрын

TaurusJinx 96

Oh great Gandhi got buffed

@knightlypoleaxe2501

6 жыл бұрын

Maybe that was the point :D

@lairdriver

6 жыл бұрын

Imagine a nuclear ghandi.. Such an oxymoron

@Skullhawk13

6 жыл бұрын

lairdriver oxymoron is like giant shrimp, or military intelligence, nuclear ghandi is just redundant

@BladeNightWing

5 жыл бұрын

"Having a weapon is very different from using it." F*king hypocrite.

@Finwaell

5 жыл бұрын

@@BladeNightWing my last game on immortal. Three continents. Only a single piece of Uranium. Guess who got it. That can't be a coincidence.

Our words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS! -Gandhi

This is actually a pretty cool idea, having silos as improvements. So you can pillage/nuke the silos to prevent people from firing nukes at you. (instead of nearly indestructible ones in cities)

Gameplay footage of AI Ghandi?

@xavgoodsgames

7 жыл бұрын

well duh, of course ;)

@felixleong61

3 жыл бұрын

Teddy is working on culture victory, everything is going very well. Then Gandhi took control.....

A strange little game. The only winning move is not to play.

@hathwaythere8830

7 жыл бұрын

DEFCON 1

@ruick78

7 жыл бұрын

Only winner is Ghandi and his nukes

@wowdywoemanwebble

7 жыл бұрын

How about a nice game of chess?

@AnonYmous-db2yy

7 жыл бұрын

I nuke your king. Check mate in one move.

@spikemasterb2521

7 жыл бұрын

Or, to destroy mutually assured destruction, place your spies in enemy cities to see their uranium resources and where their nukes are, destroy the nuke cities with nukes and hit the uranium resources with nukes so they can't even try to make nukes to attack back.

I guess you could say that I am *MAD* about this.

@bertdog2119

7 жыл бұрын

JonathanToolonie I am assured this is a great pun

@emperorpalpatine2184

7 жыл бұрын

This is going ballistic...

@JonathanToolonie

7 жыл бұрын

Emperor Palpatine I like your comment. Take my upvote.

@tommychan7170

7 жыл бұрын

I Can't Be Mad about this comment :P

@basilharpham9372

7 жыл бұрын

the feelings mutual

"Peace through nukes." -Gandhi

And of course Japan likes high density city's close to each other........

@5434345

7 жыл бұрын

One hit and 2-3 megapolises are erased from map.

@GREATGAIWAIN

7 жыл бұрын

Oh... that is sad...

@USNNautilus

7 жыл бұрын

You sir are SAVAGE

@ss25381

6 жыл бұрын

Stop the joke about atomic bomb in japan. It’s not even funny. Stop being some cheap attention seeker by making bad and cruel joke to gain attention from sub human.

@painedman2314

6 жыл бұрын

Tung Nguyen we shouldn't have stoped at 2

Great feature, gives players incentive to work together at times so as to prevent thermonuclear war. I hope however, that they seriously updated the AI, because if nukes were this destructive with the unreasonable and often bipolar AI in civ 5, the games on fun difficulty levels would probably all have ended in nuclear war.

@HanZhang1994

7 жыл бұрын

Templarkiller Gaming Hopefully they make it so the AI isn't that stupid either.

@templarkiller2926

7 жыл бұрын

Han Zhang Eh, or I will just send a paratrooper after I nuke them to take the capitol, then they won't have time to counter-nuke

@shotoa2088

7 жыл бұрын

Fallout now damages units, so that paratrooper is either dead or not strong enough to take the city.

@templarkiller2926

7 жыл бұрын

Shoto A The city will be at 0 health if you watch the video, and it would only take 1 turn after dropping him next to the city to send him in, the only way it wouldn't work is if fallout is an instant kill for troops

@shotoa2088

7 жыл бұрын

Templarkiller Gaming True, although it will be hard to get sight as spies now die when you nuke the city and sending enough will take a couple of turns, so if it is inland behind other cities it will be hard. But if it a coastal city i doubt it will be a problem.

They should also feature a vault tech just to protect the survivors when the bombs drop on the city

@eight-cloudspurple5871

7 жыл бұрын

Shitty experiment optional?

@Brandonhayhew

7 жыл бұрын

Delta Plus Yes, lets include that option for public entertainment.

@kurtis3670

7 жыл бұрын

Well DLC in Civ 5 did add bomb shelters.

@ubershark2617

7 жыл бұрын

They would be sued by Bathesda if they did that. Maybe somebody will make a mod for it.

@dukoth6552

7 жыл бұрын

well there's a simple solution for that, dont call them "Vaults"

"Would you like to play a game?" "Let's play Global-Thermonuclear War" "How about a nice game of chess?" No, let's play Global-Thermonuclear War"

Gandhi has the "Nuke Happy" agenda, "Has no hesitation when using nuclear weapons, respects other civilizations that project strength through nuclear weapons." You just couldn't help yourselves but embrace the meme. Dear god.

@pigfucker6793

7 жыл бұрын

Oreally

@aninditapaul9291

3 жыл бұрын

@Random Entertainment Wait wot

NEVER EVER let Gandhi get his hand on them.

@fede98k54

7 жыл бұрын

exact Gandhi use peacemakers xD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-118_Peacekeeper

@stamatinos21

7 жыл бұрын

I've been living peacefully next to ghandi for about 1800 years so far..... but all this stuff I'm hearing about him, I'm starting to think I should be worried... very worried

@trodeno6305

7 жыл бұрын

stamatinos21 Run while you still can. His nukes are hidden.

@MrHaus-ih3nn

7 жыл бұрын

if he researches democracy, you are doomed

The city's 'healthbar'' fainting is somehow brutal..

@chetanaik

7 жыл бұрын

IKR. Imagine watching your city in a game get hit by a nuke, and then watching this slow annihilation of your city that you painstakingly moulded over the last 5 hours....

@5434345

7 жыл бұрын

I wiah that thermonuclear nukes can outright erase cities from face of the Earth, even 40-pop megapolises with 10-20 wonders. One hit and city is nothing but inhabitable radioactive ruins, period.

@chetanaik

7 жыл бұрын

It would make it way to unbalanced, breaking the game. For example, first person to nukes could take out every capital in one turn, and win.

@yobob591

7 жыл бұрын

+Филипп Виноградов they already one shot cities for instant capture and can knock off 10 pop easy

@5434345

7 жыл бұрын

Yobob I wish nukes could completely wipe cities from Face of Earth regardless of their size and building list, like in Civ 4 mod named "Broken Star".

is warmonger gandhi still a thing in civ 6?

@muhammadzinc5228

7 жыл бұрын

lol

@lorentzfactor5118

7 жыл бұрын

it's not a real civ game if gandhi doesn't nuke anything that moves.

@Mateo-oq7ui

7 жыл бұрын

He gets a bonus if he ends wars quickly. ...And what is the quickest way of ending a war?

@OreallyR17

7 жыл бұрын

NPC Gandhi has the "Nuke Happy" as a hidden agenda. Full description is "Has no hesitation when using nuclear weapons, respects other civilizations that project strength through nuclear weapons." So yes, he now has a trait that straight up says he's a fan of the Fallout games.

@Aliens1337

7 жыл бұрын

Ayden Mikita It's a CIV tradition now. Gandhi has peaceful diplomacy, but he also has the highest Nuking potential of the leaders as a secret trait. Eliminate India before they reach the Atomic age if you don't wanna risk an Atomic cold war.

30 second unskippable ad, 1:46 video. GG ign.

@Kesta195

7 жыл бұрын

Ad blocker

@ausarthevile7151

7 жыл бұрын

Kesta195 Mobile.

@SamuelKristopher

7 жыл бұрын

I just remove the ad blocker for channels I support. I'm not gonna sit through ads on a channel I don't care about, especially if the video is short and I'm probably not going to watch another one.

@bluemoon539

7 жыл бұрын

No, its not pathetic. It's pathetic thinking they're entitled to it. We are watching their video, and possibly liking it, wich will spread it to more people through their algorithm.. Thats the REAL favor we are doing youtubers.. they aren't entitled to us watching ads at all, get off that high horse. Can always just disable the Adblocker for channels you want to support.. But theres nothing that makes them entitled to it.

@danghostman2814

7 жыл бұрын

6 second ad. 5 second Click Here To Skip enabled on it. That last second belongs to me, now.

I wish there would be some kind of high-tech laser defense system you can get later on. Something that gives a percentage-based interception chance within a few tiles.

@Adventurerblitz

7 жыл бұрын

Strategic Defense Initiative! We need an anti nuke Reagan as America's alternate leader!

@LordIvor6

7 жыл бұрын

It would be better if Uranium was a depleteable resource.

@LordIvor6

7 жыл бұрын

That's fine, if you survive the initial nuclear bombardment then you've got a chance (it's to break stalemates), but I've had games where I literally just did nothing but mass produce nukes and paratroopers gg ez (multiplayer).

@witchofengineering

7 жыл бұрын

Actually,the battleships, missile cruisers and mobile SAMs has chance to intercept nukes in.

@Adventurerblitz

7 жыл бұрын

Wiktor Guzowski Does Civ realize that actual anti ballistic missiles do exist?

Ok who let Gandhi onto the dev team

the title should be: ghandi tutorial

Small correction: in every Civ game but Civ 5, you could build SDI Defenses which intercepted all or most nukes, so you could still get into a military stalemate.

thermal nuclear bomb?! com'on Gandi is already OP, right now you are making him even more op!

Civ 6 is looking great so far. Still not a fan of the cartoony graphics but graphics don't make the game so I'll get over it.

@DexterAlenko

7 жыл бұрын

Same. It's all about getting used to it

@Baleur

7 жыл бұрын

The graphics aren't "cartoony". Bugs Bunny is cartoony.

@MagnificentErgo

7 жыл бұрын

as another commenter pointed out, it's intentional. The graphics hold up much better over a longer period of time, comparitively.

@EnclaveGeneral

7 жыл бұрын

There's a Good Chance I Won't Read This Oh I know and as a game dev myself I perfectly understand it, it's just that I wish they were a little bit more realistic.

@bobsaggat

7 жыл бұрын

Its intentional yes, but its intentional to expand rhe fanbase to include children

"Other than to deny other civilizations' uranium supplies, which isn't easy." Unless you take my approach to rushing to get nukes first, then using said nukes to capture every uranium deposit on the planet.

@shotoa2088

7 жыл бұрын

Depends how much uranium you have yourself, and if you can build the nukes fast enough before they get theirs.

@shotoa2088

7 жыл бұрын

***** So far I have seen quite a good civ player get out researched quite badly by most of the AI on prince, so there is hope.

@hokiepokie

7 жыл бұрын

Sounds exciting! Would be a major improvement over Civ V :)

@lomek4559

7 жыл бұрын

I like your avatar, what is that anime?

@bobmcbob49

7 жыл бұрын

Erwin from Girls und Panzer

cant wait for a metal gear mod

@EvanHBogle

7 жыл бұрын

lolsroflomgbla lol that'd be sick

@BifronsCandle

7 жыл бұрын

Nanomachines

Alternative title: Playing as Ghandi in Civ6

I love how cold war this is. I hope the end game will include balance of power and escalations, attempting to avoid nuclear conflict at all costs. Nukes do certainly seem more destructive than Civ V.

Interesting, though I would like to see ABMs (Anti-Ballistic Missiles) in game as to prevent enemy ICBMs or player ICBMs from hitting the city in my opinion.

War. War never changes. . .

Might as well give Gandhi a Planet Buster from Spore.

@deadpan904

5 жыл бұрын

No, don't...

I have waited do long for this video

Gandhi strikes back!

I still think they should add a second strike system in the game where if you nuke a civilization they already have pre planned retaliation nukes set to nuke right back on your cities. Lets say they add an option where you can have a planned first strike with pre set destinations set by you where your nukes will go. Then you click commence first strike and ALL of the nukes launch at your enemy at once then if they have a second strike set up they could have all their nukes launch at you at the same time.... This would be a great game mechanic and would prevent many from using nuclear weapons without thought or if you think your civilization can survive a nuclear war. Would be way better than watching your whole civ get nuked then next turn nuking back in an unrealistic and unpleasing display. as one wise man said "that was a grand display of fireworks!" wish it could be the same in civ 6 and hope they can do nukes right this time, or add it in a future update.

The only thing wrong with this is if the AI had no care of being nuked and just mass produces them. I think it will work the best online where I can see the end game turning into some form of cold war

Is it possible to launch your nukes when enemy launch is detected(that will eliminate my arsenal in 1 turn)?

While playing hotseat multiplayer with my sister, she asked me for a nuke. I gave her 10 for each of her cities. For some reason after I did that I got a domination victory.

....no defense? seriously? civ iv had the sdi vs nukes...

@chebab6219

7 жыл бұрын

realism

@chebab6219

7 жыл бұрын

raykin Yes in our age, i'm assuming this takes place during the atomic age

@mathrepkin1551

7 жыл бұрын

Sebastian Caesar atomic age or no, nukes are launched via ICBMs or shorter ranged nuke-submarines. else you go back to ww2 time when the nukes were launched from flying fortresses. either way, ICBMs, like i said, are not impossible to stop.

@FelixHaukeland

7 жыл бұрын

Functionally they are. It's like hitting a bullet with another bullet. Theoretically possible, but not in the few minutes it would take to launch and detonate.

@JonatasAdoM

7 жыл бұрын

Also you don't expect a nuclear attack and you can't pinpoint exaclty where it is going to hit. Maybe add a penalty for attacks done after a DOW and a defense bonus for citeis. But then people would exploit it hitting the tiles next to city or troops Because Thats the objective of a nuke in the game to kill a bunch of units with a singre strike.

Incorrect info. You can use bombers to deliver nukes as well. Silo and submarine have the same range, 12 hexes for normal nuke, 15 for hydrogen bomb. Also you can defend against them with aa defences (aa guns, SAMs, GDRs and patroling fighers/jet fighters). You can have destroyer patrols looking for enemy subs. You can also erase enemies' nukes in the world congress through a resolution.

Holy cow that looks awesome. That's impressive.

Wait if you take out their cities nuclear missile silo then can they not fire back?

@foreng3095

7 жыл бұрын

I wonder if the "Dead Hand" (or whatever it was called) system is in the game, obtainable through the research or what not, that you can use to automatically retaliate against nuclear strikes, essentially the MAD doctrine. Beyond that, you can see that on the tooltip on the production of nuclear weapons it said "add it to civilization inventory", so I'm guessing nuclear submarines use it or you have to load them beforehand, either way providing another mean of retaliation.

@seto007

7 жыл бұрын

You'd love to know that, wouldn't you, you dubious little rascal.

@Zer0kx

7 жыл бұрын

It would be cool to see a chain of automatically launched nukes go off in every direction once the first person launches their nuke. Adding some consequences to using nukes

@basilharpham9372

7 жыл бұрын

in the mod for civ 5 i have the world slowly becomes unlivable as more and more tiles are covered in fallout

@dickiemckay

7 жыл бұрын

Yes apart from in the video they show that you can have nuclear subs, so the chances of them firing back goes up significantly.

Civ IV still the best

@AGenericAccount

7 жыл бұрын

Civ iv also had the best music playlist

@adecoy95

7 жыл бұрын

fall from heaven > civ 5 and probably 6

@Beastinvader

7 жыл бұрын

Meh. Global warming? The earth being destroyed? Stupid concepts for the game.

@edgewayround

7 жыл бұрын

And Leonard Nemoy was the best narrator.

@edgewayround

7 жыл бұрын

Hmmmmmmm Civ V with all the DLC's is still my fave.

"Force it to become what you want to see" - Radioactive Ghandi

I played an older civ game years ago, and the nukes didn't seem to do much. Also, I kept researching science stuff for ages and it didn't advance anything. Not sure if the game was bugged or I just didn't understand it. That experience however kept me from playing any civ game since. I remember playing for dozens of turns without anything apparently happening.

I am surprised there was no Ghandi in this video.

I have become death, destroyer of worlds

@deadpan904

5 жыл бұрын

*Gandhi*

this never gets old

Hermoso increible no tengo palabras 20/10 INCREIBLE!!!!!!!!

is it possible to denie enemy building nukes by politics. like in civ5 the nuclear-proliferation treaty

@Zer0SumGame

7 жыл бұрын

Probably not at launch, because no World Congress.

@funkkymonkey6924

7 жыл бұрын

ZeroSumGame I really hated that in civ 4, the AI Always voted yes on everything, it would however be nice to be able to either choose to be a part (and have the perks of stuff like universal currency)/ reject admission, or to be able to break it and most people will attack you

@icedragon769

7 жыл бұрын

Nuclear Disarmament is a valid Casus Belli in Civ 6, you can attack someone with nukes and force them to dismantle them without getting a warmonger penalty.

@lisquidsnake

7 жыл бұрын

or have a spy be able to hamper the development of the manhattan project?

@topkek1194

7 жыл бұрын

icedragon769 wait wouldnt that force the enemy to use nukes on you though? (I havent played civ 6 yet)

It's scary how everyone is talking about how cool nukes are...

@FrostbitexP

7 жыл бұрын

They are cool though.

Thats what Forgiveness sounds like, screaming and then Silence.

So this video was a preview of AI Gandhi?

I like bigger nukes, but I detest not having any sort of countermeasures whatsoever.

@glennabraham2345

7 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Not being able to minimize damage in any way is ridiculous, especially against the thermal nuclear bomb which can singlehandedly ruin your civ career.

@princeamongkings343

7 жыл бұрын

And it seems that the nuke's invulnerability is hardcoded in by Firaxis, because I have never found a mod that allows nukes to be intercepted. Hopefully, that will not be the case for Civ 6.

@pixywings7715

7 жыл бұрын

Uranium is an extremely rare resource in civ 6 with only 2-3 uranium tiles on an entire standard map. It's going to be a lot easier to deny people uranium than Civ 4 where every 10 tiles there's uranium.

Again a civ game with no defense against nukes. Why firaxis has yet to had a mutual destruction setup for nukes is beyond me. If player x launches nuke and if receiving player has nukes set up for defense then they auto launch on preset target.

@xefjord

7 жыл бұрын

This is what nuclear submarines are for.

@Turnil321

7 жыл бұрын

there might be ways to protect against it with bunkers

@JonatasAdoM

7 жыл бұрын

PH03NIX96 Because CVI IV had that and look how that worked out. There"s no actual way to prevent nukes (and Theyre way worse in real life too) and THERE ÁREA ways to conter nukes in CIV V. Nuclear weapons are not toys and there"s a reason why we don't use them , so I think it is more that right to portray them like that.

@PH03NIX96

7 жыл бұрын

Didn't play Civ 4 so please tell me how that went. I do however know that from a game stand point you have to have a counter balance to these things or you snow ball. You could argue that's the point but it's not healthy game design. Excuse me however I may have been too rash in my judgement. I know full well what a couple well placed nuclear subs in civ 5 can surprise aggressors with a crippled economy. But to say we currently have no defenses today is silly. If they can add Xcom and GDR'S firaxis can manage a missile defense system.

@senneuh1

6 жыл бұрын

Basically you could build the SDI(strategic defense initiative) that Reagan proposed in the 80's, which gave a 50% chance to intercept missiles.

"I am become death, destroyer of worlds"

clear and precise thank you

GHAAAAAANDIIIIIII!!!!

Mother of god...

@YusakuJon3

7 жыл бұрын

Now all we need is the meme, complete with screenshot of the nuke explosion in the background.

"Otherwise, mutual destruction is assured". That's an epic, yet sad quote to close the video, and real life war.

nothing more satisfying then using a thermonuclear device.

Thumbs down; There ARE defenses, you just neglected to say what they are for the sake of drama. Air interception, Battleships, and maybe more technologies can counter them.

@melonlord4055

7 жыл бұрын

Salt

@slimebo1

7 жыл бұрын

In the game there are no defences, you dip.

@rolletroll2338

7 жыл бұрын

None of this really work you know?

@cs0345

6 жыл бұрын

Science can do amazing things. We can unlock the atom, but we can't use physics to stop ballistic missiles?

@joeljarnefelt1269

6 жыл бұрын

Intercept a nuke with a nuke.

*Gandhi intensifies*

who else is hype for Luke cage tomorrow ! 😀

@kittykuroki

7 жыл бұрын

thats a bit off topic

@BifronsCandle

7 жыл бұрын

+Kitty Cat I'm guessing they replaced Teddy as American leader.

@kittykuroki

7 жыл бұрын

SlyBiffrons why would they?

@ubershark2617

7 жыл бұрын

who?

@TehLemonsRUs

7 жыл бұрын

not me

When you hear the Prepare To Try sound at the end... Ahhh

The lesser nuke is just a normal missile, the thermo nuke is a normal nuke lol

@FrostbitexP

7 жыл бұрын

...What...? The normal missiles is a atomic bomb. The thermo nuke is a hydrogen bomb. Both are nukes...I cant tell if you ere being serious or...

@sam23696

7 жыл бұрын

The normal missile is the kind dropped on Hiroshima, that is 15 kilotons. The second is the hydrogen bomb around 25 megatons or 25000 kilotons.

@mattyryon

7 жыл бұрын

I'm talking about the effect of the weapon on the environment and the amount of damage it does relative to its IRL counterparts

@sam23696

7 жыл бұрын

Matty Monticello The scale still fits. Hiroshima only destroyed the city, and the radiation was fairly local. Villages nearby had to deal with a sudden influx of burn patients while they only saw smoke and no fallout. The effects of radiation spread because people and raw materials that were irradiated were spread around by people. If a hydrogen bomb dropped there again then I imagine the entirety of South Japan would be inhospitable and tsunamis would be raging through the pacific. It's a common misconception about the difference in scale between the two nukes. A hydrogen bomb is about ten times the scale that people imagine. Look up the Tsar bomb, it gave people in a village nearly a hundred kilometres away burns when the top crested the horizon, brighter then the sun.

wtf are there no bomb shelters like in civ 5?

@TheDinozRule

7 жыл бұрын

Mobile SAMs and battleships can intercept nukes I believe

@yellowlenny

7 жыл бұрын

They literally told you in the video that there's no way to stop a nuke.

@silverkerbal

7 жыл бұрын

WELL THERE SHOULD BE ex a sam has a 25% chance of killing a nuke

@Miiilked

7 жыл бұрын

lolno

I wonder if you have to rebuild districts that get pillaged or nuked or if you just have to repair them

Now, I am become death... The destroyer of worlds...

DAMMIT GHANDI, THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE THINGS!!!

Why not add missile defense systems that have a 50% chance of taking out a nuke. This is why these games have shitty end games

@yobob591

7 жыл бұрын

irl anti ICBMs don't work unless you intercept on launch or mid flight, even then it's not a guaranteed hit

@yobob591

7 жыл бұрын

(Can't edit on mobile) the missile travels too fast in the final third of its path

@Beastinvader

7 жыл бұрын

Your right. Perhaps they could implement a kind of anti-nuke submarine or such which has to be placed nearby the enemy's silo/nuclear submarine?

*"War... War never changes."*

so much info under just 2 minutes

People... stop spelling Gandhi wrong. Ghandi has a very weong interpretation in Hindi...

@vitorl.2684

7 жыл бұрын

could you please tell me this interpretation? I'd like to know. Sorry for my english

@taurusjinx9694

7 жыл бұрын

Well... ghand is quite a derogatory word in Hindi meaning arse.

@vitorl.2684

7 жыл бұрын

TaurusJinx 96 Ah, now I see. Thank's for answering mate.

@snorklespy

7 жыл бұрын

But in civ, Gandhi is a nuke loving Ghand. Think he's earned that name in the game, even if the misspelling was unintentional :P

@taurusjinx9694

7 жыл бұрын

Well I can't argue with that... lol.

This nuclear submarine looks god damn awfull :(((

@FrostbitexP

7 жыл бұрын

Thank god there will be mods for that.

@Rodionnx

7 жыл бұрын

All Industrial+ era units in Civ6 looks so cartoonish :(

Gandhi insters

You can also drop nukes the old fashion way by flying them there.

They forgot to mention about one secret special effect that 2 or more nukes cause - anime.

I would like to have an option for a high end anti missle unit/improvement. Being so helpless is not fun, nor is it realistic,

@chrisfox880

7 жыл бұрын

Giltr0y Actually it is realistic. There isn't much you could do if there was a nuclear missile attack. Maybe anti nuke missiles could be a future technology though

@heraissilly

7 жыл бұрын

...weve had the ability to shoot down nukes for like 60/70 years. ever heard of Norad?

@dah0heavy

7 жыл бұрын

the theoretical missile defense that is unlikely to even work? the one that has never actually been tested? Ya that NORAD norad is like the STARWARS program theoretical and hardly capable

@majorplothole2620

7 жыл бұрын

To be fair - 40-60% of nukes shot down is still better than no nukes shot down.

@RuiRuichi

7 жыл бұрын

I miss the SDI and jet fighters intercepting nukes in CIV IV. I think they're just hyping up nukes because people would otherwise build anti nukes making nukes useless. Also those BS moments where RNG decides not to give you Uranium even if you own an entire continent.

there used to be some satellite defense system in civ 4 that used to reduce nuke damage

awesome animation:D

Is there a STAR WARS program to combat this, because that seems a bit overpowered without a counter.

@MrPhilsterable

7 жыл бұрын

The counter is to build your own nukes, ensuring mutually assured destruction.

@jebwatson

7 жыл бұрын

Or just kill them before they kill you.

@anttioikarinen2960

7 жыл бұрын

They are overpowered in real life, so why not in civ?

@TheMTB13

7 жыл бұрын

They also have heavy, heavy repercussions to using in real life. You could kill billions of people in a war that goes nuclear. You can't make the thousands of nukes in game that we have in real life.

@agodin2500

7 жыл бұрын

yea but if u take game world and real world to scale , u can still make enaught nukes to kill every1 ( assuming 2-3 sides go full nuclear ham)

"There Is No Defence Against Them" Units That Can Defend Against Nuclear Strikes Battleship: Prevents Nuclear Strike From Any Civillization Up To 1 Tile Away Missile Cruiser: Prevents Nuclear Strike From Any Civillization Up To 1 Tile Away Anti Air Gun (AA Gun): Prevents Nuclear Strike From Any Civillization Up To 1 Tile Away Yes There Are Units That Prevent Nuclear Strikes. You Just Dont Read The Description For All The Units

Gandhi just got even more terrifying

It would be interesting to to see something that could intercept these. Althought it would have to be something that isn't common.

Anyone prefer the HOI4 nuke system over this?

@MRBeci1

7 жыл бұрын

No because this makes kind of more sense, because it gives the bombs a certain range and does not only destroy a state.

@BoeJlden

7 жыл бұрын

MRBeci1 I mean how you have to have air superiority to nuke someone

@TheMTB13

7 жыл бұрын

I don't think you need air superiority to launch an ICBM from a sub.

@BoeJlden

7 жыл бұрын

Michael Thomas True, but I obviously wasn't referring to that because there aren't nuclear missiles or nuclear capable submarines in HOI4, but there really should be some sort of nuke defense (including missile interception) because it really isn't fair that you have no way of intercepting nukes. I also find it to be dumb that nukes can kill units. It makes the game a lot less strategic and fun when someone just nukes your units when they are invading you.

@MRBeci1

7 жыл бұрын

Well I think we have to agree to disagree, but both systems have their ups and downs.

“Your best bet is to deny your enemy’s uranium supply, which isn’t easy” Me:nukes uranium supply

war, war never changes...

They should add an animation where any units that are under the blast where they start running around waving there hands lol

"Gotta Nuke 'Em All!" - Gandhi 2016

SAM anti air defense (costs 2000 gold I think) can prevent nukes if placed in the city right?

Jesus Christ I've played Civ V for over 1000 hours and yet for some reason the way the nukes look in Civ VI (ESPECIALLY the thermo) is honestly terrifying. That flaming shockwave knocking over all the trees...

Robot voice: Do you want to play a game?

I hear Ghandi's mad laughter already.

Cue the A.I. Gandhi jokes.

Kim : did I hear nukes ?

thx IGN for the information what Gandhi can do