Keep in mind, you can't see stars during the day, but they're still there.

@Uvoted4this

9 ай бұрын

How do you know if you can't see them

@Jordy-927

9 ай бұрын

Obviously fake. Definitely not how stars work. 😂😂 Edit: in case the emojis didn't give it away, this is a facetious comment. I can't believe smart people read this and think otherwise.

@firstnamelastname396

9 ай бұрын

Wrong look at his eyes, STARE at them notice how he talks find the middle

@lawrencedoliveiro9104

9 ай бұрын

The moon-landing deniers seem willing to concede that we have got as far as low-Earth orbit. But those photos from those flights, showing the brightness of the Earth and the darkness of space in the same picture, don’t show any stars either, for the same reason.

@mylesm5701

9 ай бұрын

@@firstnamelastname396maybe try English next time

"If i don't understand it, then it's fake."

@user-up1id5rv2m

3 ай бұрын

Of course!

@RecordedMercury

3 ай бұрын

You just have low esoteric knowledge

@joycedavis9996

3 ай бұрын

do you understand the air you breathe?

@whereismycup

3 ай бұрын

@@joycedavis9996air is fake, we breathe water, but I don’t really understand it. This is what THEY are trying to hide!

@eliminator1472

3 ай бұрын

“I’m also smarter than everyone else”

This isn't even about anything space related. It's simply how exposition in cameras works. If a very bright object, like the surface of the moon, is at the right level of exposition, very dim objects like the stars will be invisible.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

But you can’t expect illiterates to understand.

Probably why stars aren't visible in the middle of a brightly lit city.

They should hire paparazzi as astronauts. They are really good at taking pictures of stars.

@hitzoneproductions7858

3 ай бұрын

😂

@justinezafra

3 ай бұрын

Excellent Dad joke. 👌

@dandi1887

3 ай бұрын

Underrated joke

@never_give_up90

3 ай бұрын

Lol that's not bad.

@sammiedee7838

3 ай бұрын

That's a good one 👍🏽

As a photographer, this is VERY accurate.

@yamato126

4 ай бұрын

The stars are there they are just poorly rendered in 1950s 2d

@iamapokerface8992

4 ай бұрын

ok

@iamapokerface8992

4 ай бұрын

nobody cares that you are a "photographer" not a job anyway

@unknownph537

4 ай бұрын

​@@iamapokerface8992No one ask you kiddo better touch some grass

@sharkgrenadevr

4 ай бұрын

​@@iamapokerface8992 Do you think the moon landing was faked or something

Not to mention the moon rocks we brought back, the laser reflector we placed up there, and the scientific assertions that were made about what we found in going to the moon that have been helpful to return trips for us and other country's lunar missions.

@samcabezadebaca9501

18 күн бұрын

Just eating the government propaganda like it was real

@vincnet1982

4 күн бұрын

They have supposedly misplaced all those materials and all the original films.the items from the most important moment in history and they misplaced them. Also how about the "moon rock" Armstrong brought back specially for the Dutch prime minister?

@samcabezadebaca9501

4 күн бұрын

@@vincnet1982 that's NASA for you. unbelievable we lost all of the Data. LMFAO 😂

@NeoWish

3 күн бұрын

All of it can be done using probes that can go back to earth, duh Try better reasoning.

Fun fact- all the "stars" you see out of the windows on Star Trek are sequins sewn onto a black curtain just outside the focal length of the camera so they're blurry.

Tell those people to take a picture of some twinkling stars while in the city. Their cameras wouldn't even capture it.

@elidyson256

4 ай бұрын

So you admit it should've

@jbhk7977

4 ай бұрын

They feed you the easiest narrative and everyone becomes a "specialist".

@tubecated_development

4 ай бұрын

@@elidyson256?

@tubecated_development

4 ай бұрын

@@jbhk7977This is basic photography, not a ‘narrative’?

@jbhk7977

4 ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development The problem is not "photography basics". The problem is that people learned not to question the "experts". There are so many strange things surrounding the moonlanding. The "live phone call" for instance, meanwhile there are huge area's in the world (2024) where people still don't have cell service. Also the narrative that we lost the technology to go back to the moon or how they got the moon rover on the moon considering the fact that Apollo 15 was as big as apollo 11. But let's not get into that . . . The problem is that people fail to question things, only because a specialist tells you a reasonable story. Where I live we say "who checks the checker". In this case . . . no one. And if you dare to question him or question the narrative, you are a conspiracy theorist. This should scare you shitless. We entered an era where critisizm and hard questions are dismissed and rediculed. We live in an era where a virologist with 40 years of experience is "fact checked" by a 21 old woke idiot with blue hair and a nose ring banning his 30 min video with dire warning within 190 seconds. Thousands upon thousands of specialists were silenced the past 4 years by the woke liberal "experts" and look what we are facing because of that . . . excess m*rtality. Question everything my friend everything because that's the only way we evolve and stay sharp.

The Soviet Union didn't deny the Americans were on the moon. This is enough of an indicator for me to think they were, in fact, on the moon.

@lloydearlofpudding9536

3 ай бұрын

Omg, i've been saying that for so long. You just know that soviets scientists had to go over the footage hundreds of Times in Hopes of finding a fake. The soviets would've loved to expose NASA as frauds, but they did not...

@patrickjane2024

3 ай бұрын

americans probably pay them off. the real question is why russia never sent there people to the moon then if it was that easy?

@koryburdet1317

3 ай бұрын

Yeah they were walking and driving on the moon. And made a direct call to the president while up there 😂😂😂😂

@mleise8292

3 ай бұрын

That was my mother's #1 argument when it came to moon landing denial - and her brother was into that conspiracy for a while.

@mleise8292

3 ай бұрын

@@koryburdet1317 Nixon called _them_, routed through mission control. (A direct call would have 3 seconds delay, but Nixon has to wait 7 seconds until he hears back from the astronaut.)

Stanley Kubrick definitely was not an idiot

@topherkrock

Ай бұрын

He had nothing to do with the missions to the Moon.

I always say this, go to a football field at night while the lights are on during a clear sky and you can not see one star in the sky.

@bretk7916

27 күн бұрын

You are 100% correct.. The only difference between the football field and on the moon numerous factors one being the sun is not as bright as what you would think unless you were looking in its direction. In space there is no medium for light to refract or reflect off of. Which mean the sun rays or light waves continue on like a infrared laser beam. And the moon absorbs 85% of the light that is shined upon it. The light that does reflect off of the surface of the Moon illuminates nothing else due to the lack of atmosphere and continues on in whatever direction it is reflected. On earth the medium is dust particles gases like oxygen CO2 nitrogen and so on that light refracts through. Unlike the dark gray surface of the Moon that absorbs light Earth is full of water snow plants etc that reflect more sunlight The light that is reflected is refracted and reflected by the atmosphere what is reflected comes back to Earth once again. This is why the earth is illuminated. On top of everything else out on the moon there would be no atmosphere to block infrared light as the Earth's atmosphere does and just so happens that cameras back then or even today actually even digital pick up infrared light that we cannot see. To get an idea of what it would be like with the sun shining on the moon. If you paint a room with nothing in it the walls black a flat black and shine a flashlight into that room You will not see it because there's nothing for it to reflect off of because it absorbs all the light. Unless you are in the room looking back towards the flashlight is the only way you'd see it.

@sakshamsanwaria7486

25 күн бұрын

​@@bretk7916We didn't go to the moon then, huh?

@emilioparrilla465

8 күн бұрын

​@@sakshamsanwaria7486obviously. All apollo missions have been thoroughly debunked from top to bottom. And you would never even dream of debating that or you will be crushed unequivocally. Just assume you're correct and go on with your day 👍

@deryk2002au

3 күн бұрын

Neil De Grassy thinks men can be women so... can't take him seriously on anything

There's pretty much one thing that shuts down any conspiracy for me; the Soviets. They had supreme means and motive to call us out but never said a word. Congratulated us actually.

@Taj_Rahine

2 ай бұрын

Russian a.i. identified the moon landing photos as fake about a month or so ago.

@REGjr

Ай бұрын

Sarcastically, to let Nixon know they weren't fooled.

@OM19_MO79

Ай бұрын

Oh, and Russians congratulating Nixon, is not much different from the Japanese capitulating to MacArthur. It was that or see if someone would still stand in a nuclear war. Well, you should be excited, we may found out that this year. I am. I’m tired.

@MATTINCALI

Ай бұрын

all govs in the same club, should know that by now

@benno291980

Ай бұрын

​@@MATTINCALIRight. "We spend trillions of dollars opposing each other, but let's secretly collaborate on this one thing for...reasons..."

How terrifying being in space and on the moon must have been, but also exhilarating.

@user-fb5jr9ih1w

2 ай бұрын

Didn’t happen

@mr.anderson6040

2 ай бұрын

Also, your brain development after you were born​😂😂😂@user-fb5jr9ih1w

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

@@user-fb5jr9ih1wyou forgot evidence to prove your claim.

@Isaac5123

2 ай бұрын

No way it happened. The american flag stays up by the wind where there is no atmosphere there lol😅​@@user-fb5jr9ih1w

@OhRealG

2 ай бұрын

@@user-fb5jr9ih1wyes it did

I just love how the cameraman allowed the other dude to be labelled the first to land

@theonlyspoon

Ай бұрын

Shhhhh puppy. Go back to bed.

Once I read that the TI-83 calculator has six times more processing power than the computer that landed Apollo 11 on the moon, I was convinced the moon landing must be real.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

Incredulity is not evidence. If you were a proper nerd you would know how they got to the moon with the AGC

@Ron742_

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development True. Just because people can't believe that a calculator did the heavy lifting to get the missile into space, they shouldn't discredit the AGC. It was a vital backup part for the space excursion of 1969.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@Ron742_ If you get the chance I recommend watching the movie “Hidden Figures” , better still, the book by Margot Lee Shetterly

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@Ron742_Like I said…

@Ron742_

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development Sadly, they won't attempt to visit the moon these days because the TI-83 wouldn't be able to lift modern missiles, even with the AGC acting as the backup.

Photographer here. Stars are dim and require long exposures and high camera sensibility (high ISO). Sunlight, on earth, is so bright, that not a single star can be captured on the sensor using the same settings as a day scene. So, if the astronauts are lit by the sun, and the picture has to display them, then no stars will be seen on film or on a digital sensor.

@shauncejohn9200

6 ай бұрын

Ty❤

@nikolozka1

6 ай бұрын

Does that make the earth to shrink too?

@lazymass

6 ай бұрын

​@@nikolozka1what are you talking about? People like you really do have some problem to comprehend space distances, don't ya?

@user-ch7ks9ph5l

6 ай бұрын

​@@lazymassrelax man

@BasilMalik

6 ай бұрын

tog here, confirmed.

As someone who previously worked in film and media production I can tell you he's not lying. Aperture, ISO and fps are factors in every video, even your tik tok videos.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

But your brain works differently than the conspiracy-theorist brain. If they don’t understand it and/or they don’t want to accept it, then that makes it a ‘lie’.

@mihaicolceriu-nicola7148

Ай бұрын

​@@tubecated_developmentmore like he has a brain,while those idiots lost it somewhere😂

@misterdee1418

Ай бұрын

Fake news

@larrykinsella8282

Ай бұрын

​@@misterdee1418?

@adamstevens3263

Ай бұрын

Its because theres alot of fake news online so people dont know what to believe or how to even decern real from fake. So alot of people go with the most "mind blowing facts" theyve heard

For anyone intrigued by the Apollo missions: go and listen to the “13 minutes to the moon” podcast. Really informative!

@Kube_Dog

Ай бұрын

How long is the podcast?

@Dr.Bob85

Ай бұрын

@@Kube_Dog there are 2 seasons, each around 10 episodes. So hours of fun! Season 1 focuses on the Apollo 11 story of getting men to the moon and back. Season 2 focuses on the Apollo 13 story. I can’t oversell this podcast, I have listened to it in full 2 or 3 times.

Sunlight on the moon is just about as bright as sunlight on Earth

@kirkdarling4120

Ай бұрын

That's why a good exposure of the moon from the earth is the same as a daylight exposure of a subject on the earth.

The camera man was the first person on the moon, THEN Neil and Buzz.

@claudiopadilha6551

9 ай бұрын

hahahaha

@Alexander-wl8qd

9 ай бұрын

😢😂

@davidhillman7004

9 ай бұрын

Yes this picture that you refer too is what I was talking about

@davidcross5455

9 ай бұрын

And the last I think he's still up there

@dhamm7415

9 ай бұрын

The rover you mean 😂

They are the same ones who don't go on cruise ships for fear of falling off the edge. 😂

@skyshatter3633

5 ай бұрын

no, no they claim the edge is guarded by military who will prevent them from reaching it. Aka why they cant go there to prove their bs

@danno5805

4 ай бұрын

Those railings should be higher 😮

@Xinnie_The_Flu

4 ай бұрын

Are they Muslims?😂

@Venomm737

4 ай бұрын

​@@CareBear-hi3cxThat's a coincidence

@user-lq1tb1eq7z

4 ай бұрын

You KNOW... dontcha?!

Keep in mind that was 1969 and yet we can't seem to get back to the moon and it's 2024😮

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

11 күн бұрын

It takes a huge amount of resources, manpower and finance to carry out a manned lunar landing. Between the end of the Apollo Program when the US congress cut the Apollo funding and the current Artemis Program who exactly was volunteering to provide these resources, manpower and finance? Take care.

@georgebarnes3554

3 күн бұрын

This current generation can't do anything. I grew up during the apollo missions and our current culture is disgracefully negative compared to the way we were back then..so...ponder that

@randallappell9606

3 күн бұрын

I think it has more to do with no seat belts in cars back then. We didn't worry about killing astronauts. Now we are more concerned with safety. I think we could go to Mars or the moon but we choose not to.

@ShawnLattimore

2 күн бұрын

​@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthwe have the technology to get there, we just been several times and we just haven't been back until we find a good enough reason to put all that money, time and resources into going..

@vandalg282

Күн бұрын

Horrible conspiracy take. Learn/do the research, on what they did to get there. Nothing beats Solar rays and radiation. The team got lucky, these days its better to send a probe...which we have, dozens of times. There's nothing there but rock. Why endanger lives when you can send a robot? Fkucing morons.

We didn't land on the moon

These are the same people that say the Earth is flat and not a sphere

@blotfd

Ай бұрын

it's level. it's a horizon not a curvizon, c'mon now

@eggabacon

Ай бұрын

It's obviously an obtuse angle that changes degrees throughout the day

@adamstevens3263

Ай бұрын

It usually goes hand in hand

@SinoKadafi1091977

Ай бұрын

It’s flat and oval shaped

@harleyb7880

Ай бұрын

The earth is flat tho

It’s hard enough to take a picture of the stars at night on earth without night mode settings, let alone with a camera from 1969

@castleanthrax1833

5 ай бұрын

And almost impossible when you aren't intentionally trying to photograph stars.

@jmoney6043

5 ай бұрын

Funny how much better our technology is now then in 1969 but we still can't go back. 😂😂

@castleanthrax1833

5 ай бұрын

@@jmoney6043 Than*

@bretk7916

5 ай бұрын

This is not accurate at all it's actually pretty easy I just did it the other day just to test the theory I live out in the country and I have a pole light and I was able to photograph the stars along with the roof of my shop at the same time with my Android phone no special settings. Although that is a digital photograph. But in turn film like what they would have used back then reacts to light. Even light from far off distance like stars which would actually be brighter on the surface of the Moon because there would be more frequencies of light like infrared which cameras pick up this is what camera flashes use to illuminate the object your photographing That's why some flashes aren't very bright or even way back when when they used a flame for their flash because if we could see infrared light that flame would be extremely bright.. I guess you wouldn't call it a flame but a very mild explosion I guess you could say

@castleanthrax1833

5 ай бұрын

@@bretk7916 Humans can't see infra-red light at all, so if a flash is at all visible, there must be some form of light in the visible spectrum. We can only feel infra-red light, otherwise known as heat.

Just because people are too uneducated to understand something doesn't mean it isn't true

“You can’t see stars during the day.” The Sun: Am I a joke to you?

Can we see stars in the daylight on PLANET EARTH!!!! VERY RARELY! So why would you expect to see stars on the moon in bright sunlight???

@NYKevin100

4 ай бұрын

To be fair, Rayleigh scattering makes it a lot harder on Earth than it would be on the Moon (no atmosphere). But apparently that just doesn't make enough of a difference.

@christopherscott8853

4 ай бұрын

Open your eyes. I'm disgusted with my own father for his role in perpetuating this illusion. Use your God given brain. No one or vessel has ever been to Mars let alone the moon

@altortugas5979

4 ай бұрын

That’s an idiotic thing to say.

@christopherscott8853

4 ай бұрын

@@altortugas5979 says who?

@nightmarexgaming120

4 ай бұрын

⁠@@christopherscott8853I don’t believe in god. Yes we did land on the moon. And why would land in mars first?

They faked it but it was hard to emulate on earth, so they filmed it on location

@dandan2593

9 ай бұрын

Wishful thinking!

@frankhtlllful

9 ай бұрын

😂

@aribaariba8609

9 ай бұрын

Where ?

@XK1773

9 ай бұрын

@@aribaariba8609 the moon

@michaellawson6926

9 ай бұрын

lmfao

For non photographers. Go take a photo of the moon at night and tell me if you can see other stars in the photo

@4YDDY80

28 күн бұрын

Not every camera can pick it up

@tubecated_development

28 күн бұрын

@@4YDDY80Name one that can?

@tubecated_development

26 күн бұрын

I’ll wait….

in bright daylight! this sums everything up: we cannot see stars in daylight on earth because the sun is too bright (and because of the atmosphere too), so why should it be different on the moon? There's too much light in the sky that's why we cannot see stars (i know it's not the real reason but it's easier to understand to all people who don't understand why there's no stars on the Apollo missions photos) There's too much light

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

“bUt thE sKy Is BLack urGH”

NASA may not be idiots but they do think that we are.

@maymei6742

2 ай бұрын

Those that agree with this video is absolutely idiots... don't they know space is vacumn ... ie no air and wind.... Why the flag that Neil Amstrong put on d moon is waving!!! Yes NASA was idiot as they couldn't simulate a vacumn environment

@JSun3000

2 ай бұрын

FACTS💯

@lucasrenz3984

2 ай бұрын

we kinda are in terms of knowledge base

@unreachablehorizons8624

2 ай бұрын

You are

@powbobs

2 ай бұрын

Explain

I like how we explain stuff we learned in school to those that never paid attention

@tubecated_development

4 ай бұрын

KZread comments for conspiracy-nutz is like an even more broken adult version of their childhood selves getting others to do their homework. EDIT: On close inspection you realise that their ‘questions’ aren’t even real questions, it’s just idiotic ‘gotcha’ rhetoric, as they’re not even remotely interested in learning, they’re not genuinely curious about anything.

@user-tc3yu7jh1b

3 ай бұрын

That's because they need to push the lie still

@MonkeyDLuffy-cm4fm

3 ай бұрын

I was the class clown and I already know this. 🤣😂

@PayToPlaySS

3 ай бұрын

we? ur just a viewer lol

@DM-wu5hn

3 ай бұрын

For some people, the world is much duller, less surrounded by lures, but not that bad.

What I find the most hilarious is that most of the evidence they use to disprove the moon landing, proves that it did. 😂😂

@samcabezadebaca9501

18 күн бұрын

Yeah just keep sucking up that government propaganda.

It's also crazy to think we couldn't go to the moon in a vehicle made of aluminum foil.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

It’s crazy to think that even in 2024 people still do not possess the ability to read about how a vehicle is constructed.

@RezPlank

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development Which is why we keep making them and keep going back.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@RezPlank No, even your sarcasm is a low-witted misadventure. The reasons you personally lack the intellectual resources to research _how_ they were constructed are connected to the reasons you personally are unwilling to research the history of _why_ Apollo was defunded, and _why_ no new crewed moon-missions have been given the green light (over successive administrations) until more recently for Orion/Artemis. The next generation of lander will need to do more for less. Nasa’s budget for Apollo was huge. They had 400,000+ people working on the Apollo project and Artemis doesn’t have anywhere near that level or resources now.

@RezPlank

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development I almost forgot about the private space missions. It's a good thing we have Elon and friends, NASA is too expensive anyway.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@RezPlankHow much of people’s tax money is NASA paying SpaceX to blow up all these rockets? And SpaceX are way, way, way short of delivering for Artemis at present. In 2023 SpaceX had gotten a total of $15.3 billion from the government since 2003. The bigger issue is that as a privately-held company, SpaceX's financials are not transparent.

NASA threw him $20

@gazw9595

8 ай бұрын

Nasa threw him some moon rock....

@HelloWorld-lh1wk

8 ай бұрын

dude he is the man who removed pluto from the planet list and you are talking about $20

@SSK077

8 ай бұрын

😂😂

@dollwatibhat221

8 ай бұрын

May be ur parents should have thrown 20$ on your education 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♂️

@joewinston7132

8 ай бұрын

FlatEarthers threw you 2$

I love how people use their own ignorance as an argument. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t mean it isn’t true.

@thegoat3109

3 ай бұрын

Like evolution theory or big bang theory?

@numbdigger9552

3 ай бұрын

​@@thegoat3109yeah. Exactly like those

@afropunkx

3 ай бұрын

@@thegoat3109 yeah or round earth theory 🤣

@electronicfootball9219

3 ай бұрын

Yeah, just like people who doesn't understand who God is or how he can exist conclude that he is not true. Yet they can't prove he doesn't exist either.😢

@JohnRapheal7

3 ай бұрын

How come we only went once and have never been back?

Also keep in mind, the cameras were not near as advanced back then as they are now. Plus, If you look closely you will see little flashes in the black of what I believe to be stars.

@tubecated_development

20 күн бұрын

It is arguably nothing to do with the cameras compared to modern cameras? They were excellent cameras. Their Hasselblad with 70mm and Ektachrome 12 is (very roughly) equivalent to 120 megapixels and the dynamic range was excellent, especially the B&W Panatomic film. The original film is capable of capturing a very wide range of grey scale variation. When scanned, the combination of small pixels (5 micron) and the 14-bit grey scale meant large film scans, at approximately 1.3 GB each and 12,800 x 12,800 pixels @ 200pixels/mm with 14-bit A/D (16,384 shades of grey). Why no/few stars? It was daytime on the moon. You will not get stars showing around the moon even when you take a zoom photo of the moon at night from Earth with any modern camera. Camera sensors have not yet matched let alone exceeded the dynamic range of the human eye, and the human eye cannot register both sunlight (bright reflected sunlight) and starlight simultaneously

@Tucker26

20 күн бұрын

@@tubecated_development Cool

You can check this at home. Find a place where you can see the stars. Now, in the foreground, place a person in a bright white outfit, as white as the astronauts' spacesuits. Shine light on it to full daylight level. Take a picture with your smartphone. How many stars do you think you'll see in the photo?

@tubecated_development

2 күн бұрын

“Shine a light on it to full daylight level” Good luck finding that light …

In the Apollo 13 story, the crew had to align their navigation at some point and their main trouble was they didn’t have a visual on any stars due to the brightness given off by earth and the sun itself. Once they realized they had a very big known star to look at (our sun), they got it together and made their calculations. It’s indeed very hard to see stars when the big, bright planet it sitting in your face.

@michaelr3333

Ай бұрын

People that were there, before they passed away, admitted the moon photos were fake. And it was taken in a plane hanger, and they spread cement dust and other dust all on the ground. And fooled people. Then they said they lost the blueprints to go to the moon. "By chance" And now we are all currently trying to make it there.

Thats why you see more stars outside of the city. City lights do the same to our eyes 👍

@bretk7916

5 ай бұрын

Light on Earth and on the surface of the moon act completely different. You don't have what they call light pollution on the surface of the Moon. And you don't have an atmosphere that absorbs and reflects light. It does let some frequencies of light through of course. But this means that the stars would be bigger and brighter from the surface of the Moon due to no degradation of light being blocked by dust and other things in the air along with the atmosphere. So they would be much brighter and bolder. Especially if we had a camera because they pick up infrared light that we cannot see..

@mr_koko2070

5 ай бұрын

​​​@@bretk7916 You're somewhat right, that's why the moon's horizon seems so bold in the videos and pictures from the surface of the moon, but it doesn't change the fact that you can't see the stars - camera, just as your eyes, tries to correct itself to see the bright thing. You can try it out with just a lamp and the camera on your smartphone; if you turn of the lights and turn on the lamp, and try rotating around the room, then you'll see the rest of the room become darker when you point the camera at the lamp. You can imagine that the lamp is the moon (since it's very reflective) and the rest of the room is open space with stars.

@trillex1861

5 ай бұрын

​@@bretk7916You dont understand how dynamic range works. Cameras have less dynamic range than our eyes. If you want to see the stars in the image, the surface of the moon would be to bright.

@bretk7916

5 ай бұрын

@@trillex1861 this is not true for one the moon absorbs 85% of the light shined upon it from the Sun what does reflect it's not exactly scattered light because there is no other medium in space for light to reflect or refract off of you can tell this by the grayish color of their space suits but when they were on the surface of the Earth they were bright white. The only time the Sun is super bright when you're in space is when you look at it it's not like walking outside after being in the movie theater and it just super bright outside it doesn't work like that there. And as far as your comment about the dynamic range. Unfortunately for you I do know a little bit about it and the camera that they use was a 70 mm black and white film camera which has huge dynamic range especially being in black and white because even with color film the dynamic range is still exceptionally high especially for the blacks and whites. Also in space there is no light pollution or restriction on the light produced from stars along with the continuum in space light just continues on without no degradation so stars would be much brighter and bolder on the surface of the moon...

@bretk7916

5 ай бұрын

@@trillex1861 IMAX uses 70 mm colored film. And if you ever been to one of them you know the dynamic range is very vast.. digital does not have near the dynamic range and I am able to take a picture of the roof of my shop with the stars at the same time

Reason number 1 for the moon landing being real: Russia had *very* good reason to call it out if the landing was faked. They didn't.

@Terence-zz3to

29 күн бұрын

Orrrrr,if Russia did call it out, how would regular civilian unenthusiest peoples ever be notified or told?? You think they'd just OPENLY give Putin a 60 minutes special to TELL ALL!?!?!? Peoples these days. I've lost hope in this thing called humanity...

@donnasheppard7371

29 күн бұрын

Not yet

@exscape

28 күн бұрын

@@Terence-zz3to Russia has had over 50 years to somehow get it out that the moon landings were faked (along with their evidence, of course). You really think the US would have been able to keep it quiet for that long?

@sgfgraham1338

27 күн бұрын

BC somebody had to be the first to fake it. They were all in it. Show them exiting the atmosphere like you show ocean dives and I will be closer to believing it

@Meme-fest

27 күн бұрын

​@@Terence-zz3tonah but it'd be in the news

Please prove the flat Earth conspiracy wrong

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

it’s been done 100,000 times hasnt it?

@zap296

Ай бұрын

go to school

You can do this at home. Set your camera to auto, or use a phone. Look around a room at night with a lamp on, you can see the room. Now point the camera at the lamp, the room turns black and the lamp becomes correctly exposed. The lamp represents the earth and moon, the room is your stars.

@Fatality_1975_

5 ай бұрын

But you are not at home ur on Moon,there is vacoom,there no atmosphere!

@utkarsh_katiyar

5 ай бұрын

Wow man, great analogy. Thanks 🙏

@lisakuntzman7834

5 ай бұрын

Wackado

@rickkwitkoski1976

5 ай бұрын

Exactly! But photography numpties just don't get it.

@OliviaCerrano

5 ай бұрын

Makes no sense lmao

I have watched Formula 1 on tv from countries that have a night race. If you glimpse the sky it is completely black, no stars but you do see the moon.

@tubecated_development

4 ай бұрын

Must of been NASA/NIKON cameras

@robertramsey653

4 ай бұрын

Same with high school football games.

@SAN-bi2vm

4 ай бұрын

​@tubecated_development Lmao you are even gramaticaly incorrect.

@tubecated_development

4 ай бұрын

@@SAN-bi2vm so what? Doesn’t mean NASA ARENT LYING You shouldn’t be convinced, it’s all lies and that’s what you want to believe. If you want to check that NASA are controlling our cameras now and removing our ability to see and photograph stars near the moon, just image- search online, any image of “super zoom moon night” See what I mean? They’re trying to cover their tracks by controlling our cameras, not allowing our cameras to see stars near the moon.

@peeperleviathan2839

4 ай бұрын

Those races are very illuminated and are near city’s

If they had landed on the moon, they would be hauling trash and dumping it on the moon..

@benjaminbronnimann3966

Ай бұрын

Who would spend tens of billions just to dump some trash on a spacerock ? Doesn't sound like the smartest investment 😂

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

Isn’t it cheaper to dump it in the ocean? Speaking of which, if they went to the bottom of the ocean in 1960, why did it take them 52 years to go back there? And why aren’t we living in bubble houses in the bottom of the ocean? Why isn’t there an ocean base at the bottom of the ocean?

@dwightgraham7250

23 күн бұрын

Dam..... DUMPING TRASH ON THE MOON WAS A JOKE..WOW..STOP BEING SO SERIOUS ABOUT EVERY LITTLE THING..LAUGH A LITTLE..YOU WILL SEE THAT YOUR DAY MAY GO A LITTLE BETTER OR SOMETHING.. YOU NEVER KNOW..TRY IT SOME TIME..GEEESSSZZ

People don't understand that with 1960's video tech it would've been literally harder to fake the moon landing, than to actually land on the moon.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

Impossible to have faked, given the quality and quantity of evidence.

@Gerrard_7up

7 күн бұрын

Ever watched star trek ? People had no reason back then to doubt .

@tubecated_development

7 күн бұрын

@@Gerrard_7up 🤦

Anyway, a friend of mine one day told me that the moon photographies are faked for this reason. I told him to take a photo outside (at night, anyway) of his car. Taking attention that the sky is in the view. He saw no stars. Then I could explain that the exposition time + the light in the streets avoid having so low lights from the stars. Excuse my English.

@tubecated_development

3 ай бұрын

Next time on a clear night, ask him to take a super-zoom photograph of the Moon’s surface ;) or even to do an image search for some…

Judging from the level of different technologies back in the day, I bet faking it convincingly was harder than actually doing it.

@tubecated_development

5 ай бұрын

Correct.

@Da_Infamous

4 ай бұрын

Well I've seen Leonardo decapreo or how ever his last name is spelled..... but I've seen him die from the Titanic and thst ship went down like 40 years before he was even born..... I've also seen "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away some little "orphan" blow up a giant man made planet called the "death star" and if we really went to the moon the United States would be sending the moon money..... just sayin

@Da_Infamous

4 ай бұрын

So..... its a good thing the gobment wouldn't LIE to us about getting to the moon..... so if "they" say we went than we totally did

@tubecated_development

4 ай бұрын

@@Da_Infamous Opinions and feelyweelies, vs physics and falsifiable evidence? I always choose physics. Your mileage may vary.

@connorpfeifer7549

4 ай бұрын

how’d they get thru the van allen belt?plus, The vacuum on the moon is almost perfect while in lower Earth orbit it's basically still thin air. Such a vacuum needs to be sealed by at least a couple of inches of metal not just zippers and fabrics. This vacuum can even weld metals together and can't be simulated on Earth in this extreme.

He's definitely right 👏🤣

"You think Nasa are idiots ?" Yes and No ....They are idiots but not when it comes to your money

This is basically the same as when I wake up in the middle of the night and turn on the light of the washroom. I can't see anything...for a few seconds! A camera isn't as sophisticated as our eyes!

@xbrandi12345x

Ай бұрын

You wake up and turn on a light? 😂 I do everything in the dark haha

@lucasread1743

Ай бұрын

@@xbrandi12345xI assume you wake up very early

@RalphSampson...

Ай бұрын

​@@lucasread1743 No. You wake up late.

@michaelr3333

Ай бұрын

People that were there, before they passed away, admitted the moon photos were fake. And it was taken in a plane hanger, and they spread cement dust and other dust all on the ground. And fooled people. Then they said they lost the blueprints to go to the moon. "By chance" And now we are all currently trying to make it there.

@xxredshiftxx

Ай бұрын

So if the camera can't image the stars , the Astronauts would be able to , I find picturing such a sight much more impressive for a life changing experience.

They're laughing at flat-Earthers.

@johngavin1175

9 ай бұрын

Flat earthers are insane

@dodgersallday4290

9 ай бұрын

There’s plenty of non-flat-earthers that think the moon landing was faked

@MediaSubliminal

9 ай бұрын

Doesn't everyone? It's really easy to prove that the earth is not flat

@Jordy-927

9 ай бұрын

@@MediaSubliminal not if you disregard real science and make up your own. 🤣

@FusionSimulations

9 ай бұрын

​@Jordy-927 I'm assuming you're one who believes the Earth is flat. And that you somehow know the "real science", that proves the hundreds and thousands of scientists before us and currently - that have all replicated results - wrong?

No, we landed on the moon; but the moon did not land on me.

Imagine Buzz Aldrin, who lives in this age. He went to the moon and back, one of the first. He risked his life, he did experiments up there. Only to have some guys today erasing his and the other astronauts' contributions. This is insane

@jangtheconqueror

2 ай бұрын

Those idiots couldn't erase the accomplishments of the Apollo missions with their silly little theories. It does highlight the need for better education standards in the US though

@cenozoaband

2 ай бұрын

@@jangtheconqueror I agree, but just imagine how these guys feel when they come across such people..

@kylecrowson1417

2 ай бұрын

I'm sure he doesn't take them very seriously.

@Yesbutactuallyno123

2 ай бұрын

Iirc he or one of the other apollo astronauts literally beat someone up over it so i think they do care Again i could be wrong​@kylecrowson1417

@sakurashogun

2 ай бұрын

You don't have to imagine, it is on record even recently there is video of Buzz beating common sense into some of these wackos.

Extraterrestrial here. I can confirm there are stars during the day but you can’t see them.

I never thought it was faked. But his point is gold!

They said in an interview they didn’t see stars

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

22 күн бұрын

That is correct. It is extremely difficult for an astronaut to see stars with the unaided eye from the bright, daytime lunar surface.

@paulisfat8077

17 күн бұрын

You ever seen stars during the daytime?

for additional information, Nvidia reproduced the moon scene, and simulated the light intensity, and the camera exposure control (hope I got the name right), and there was no stars in the final rendered image

Anyone who’s ever tried to take a picture of the moon can tell you that you won’t get stars in the picture unless the moon is a glaring white blob.

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

It makes you realise how few people have ever taken a photo of the moon (or have even looked at a photo of the moon)

@tbengineering7066

2 ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development or really paid attention to how they take photos. Look at how they argue that NASA uses CGI. Yeah, they are right, it is CGI. But the CGI used isn't to fake something, but to create a composite photo. What NASA does is no different than the Panorama or Spherical Mode we have on our cameras, which is take snapshots and combine all of them into one picture. And if you ever actually looked at your pictures after using those two modes, you will notice that they are quite accurate to what you see around you (though with some artifact errors due to your movement or things moving around you).

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

@@tbengineering7066 I know this. Agreed.

@jasonjuarez6429

2 ай бұрын

Yeah... that's not true

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

@@jasonjuarez6429 Go do an image search (guess you’re too lazy to do the experiment yourself with a zoom camera) Search ‘full moon zoom’ Count the stars around the moon. Oops. Go look at the HD footage of the IM-Lander separating from Falcon 9. Again, count the stars… Oops. It’s like your default is ‘lie about stuff’

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." -- Isaac Asimov

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

We will probably never know how many of these thousands and thousands of ignorant and anti-American, anti-Western, anti-scientific comments are from troll-farms, or from degenerate kids etc etc. But there is a tidal wave of anti-intellectual trolling that has become ‘mainstream’ as far as social media and reactive, populist politics and policies are concerned.

@fxsic

Ай бұрын

W quote

@lancecarter1888

Ай бұрын

Yeah there are people who don’t even know what a woman is anymore. It’s getting scary out there.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@lancecarter1888 🤦🏼‍♂️

@lancecarter1888

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development am I wrong?

Believe it, because the U.S. would never lie to the world about anything.... 😅

@tubecated_development

7 күн бұрын

The moon landings are evidenced by the evidence, not by belief.

I had an Uncle who’s worked on Lasers for the US around this time. NASA was looking at them for distance measurements and such. We watched the Lunar landing at his house that day. I believe every bit of it.

@zachnoll6245

Ай бұрын

My managers mom AND dad worked for the apollo missions (cant remember which ones and think they worked on several of them) and he gets very upset when people try and say the moon landing was fake. Like personally offended and he can shoot down all their counter points like he's speed running COD.

@FUNNYMANERICWHITE

Ай бұрын

​@zachnoll6245 just curious, did he ever go to the moon or seen others do it from position

@zachnoll6245

Ай бұрын

Its critical thinkig, wether they worked on just the math for vectors or worked with engineering or any of the other 400,000 jobs they had to do. They worked on it. They know it was possible because math never lies. Like when the we asked one of the scientist who worked on the nuclear bomb if they ever thought it might not work he said No, he knew exactly what was gonna happen and how big it was going to be (did mention a thing about numbers on a page get so beg they can become impossible for the human mind to comprend and once seeing it go off didnt expect it to be so massive) @@FUNNYMANERICWHITE

@OM19_MO79

Ай бұрын

@@zachnoll6245 Offended by what? That people can’t believe some Americans and later some Russians went to the moon 50 years ago and that was it? They should be embarrassed to have been part of a disguised battle for world supremacy in a war that’s still being fought and we’ll all lose. Why don’t we go to the moon? Because the real answer is not that it was fake, but we went there to define who would own the world for the following decade or two. We don’t go now because it’s pointless, there are no rewards, space exploration is physically impossible, sci-fi magic is not real to make us go beyond the moon and back safely, fast, with long stays with benefits for everyone. Today, Russians rather want to destroy their enemies and conquer the world than going to the moon while Americans are on the brink of both the end of democracy and a civil war. At least with the “we never went to the moon” answer you don’t end up disappointed in mankind.

@kozmiclando

Ай бұрын

@@zachnoll6245So Basically U Know Someone That Knows Someone Who Pushes Nasa Lies…Good For U 👏🏿

NASA are not idiots but they know most people are.

@pops8595

6 ай бұрын

exactly!

@lazymass

6 ай бұрын

Mostly people that really to this day think earth is flat, space doesnt exist and we weren't on the moon...

@joshuaphillips755

6 ай бұрын

I'm an idiot and I know most people are

@pops8595

6 ай бұрын

@@lazymass the guy believes that some human being stepped on the moon, LOL

@lazymass

6 ай бұрын

@@pops8595 well... you know, education does a lot for one... You should try it some day...

I will not believe this smart people till they give us back our Pluto....

There is grass on the floor… grass💀

Moon landing hoaxers are at about the same level of credibility as flat earthers.

@never_give_up90

3 ай бұрын

Aren't they the same people?

@tubecated_development

3 ай бұрын

@@never_give_up90no. Often, but not always, not even close.

@MrDrluv84

3 ай бұрын

You sound like someone with a booster shot..

@never_give_up90

3 ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development well, the ones I seem to meet are always both. I meant, the same people, not the same denials.

@user-du4oy7ul6n

3 ай бұрын

No many scientist belive that moon landing is a hoax

Same as how you can barely see any stars in the city but in the woods or mounts you'll see tons of them

@MotersickleBum

4 ай бұрын

THERE'S NO ATMOSPHERE ON THE MOON!

@kamikeserpentail3778

4 ай бұрын

​​@@MotersickleBumuhhh... Are you implying there's less atmosphere in the woods? The guy above you is talking about light pollution. Unless you're just emulating the people who say we haven't landed on the moon, but then satire isn't always easy to read in text.

Alright Mr smartest person in the universe, how did NASA "lose the technology" to return to the moon after the Apollo missions?

@dennieflowers335

Ай бұрын

That’s what I’m saying. They don’t want to address that kinda issue. Cause even if they lost it they should’ve figured it out again by now with technology being so much more advanced. But the smart round earthers don’t see it from that angle.

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

Ай бұрын

The technology was only "lost" in the sense that after the US Congress cut the Apollo funding then the equipment and facilities were not replaced and became obsolete. Do better than cherry-pick words and attempt to shoe-horn your own meaning into them. Take care.

@niox1920

29 күн бұрын

@@dennieflowers335 They didn't. Artemis program and SLS is going back to the moon. What they lost is the means to build more Saturn Vs. we "lost" the technology because the parts used are not manufactured anymore. Companies that were used to make custom parts have gone out of business. We have the blueprints still. Easier to just design a new rocket.

@dennieflowers335

29 күн бұрын

@@niox1920 talk to me when they do go back 🤣. It’s gonna take a “flat-earther” to go up there with them and confirm it cause we all know men (America especially) are mostly liars.

@kurtrosado3245

28 күн бұрын

The answer is: Money. Or more accurately...the lack thereof. It was a very expensive endeavor. The Mercury & Gemini programs must also be included, as these essential steps needed to be completed before attempting the landing. Apollo's 7, 8, 9 & 10 also fall into this category. 13 doesn't count, due to a catastrophic failure of an essential oxygen tank that took out the electrical system in the Service Module. That was a close shave. It was called the "Successful Failure". Had that tank blown after the landing taken place...I don't even want to think about that scenario.

Well done, simple and to the point.

I’m guessing if it were lunar night it probably would’ve been the most incredible view of space that human eyes would’ve ever witnessed.

@FiresplitterSpeedrun

4 ай бұрын

Yes, but idk if that sight would have been worth it considering the price they would have had to pay for it, and I don't think that view would ever have came to us.

@on19s

4 ай бұрын

@@FiresplitterSpeedruncause it’s fake. We never have been on the moon. It’s 2024. Why haven’t we gone back? It’s been how many years? How many technological advances? Yea aight…

@FiresplitterSpeedrun

4 ай бұрын

@@on19s You do know what the temperature on the moon during nighttime is, right? To call it a little chilly would be the understatement of the century.

@on19s

4 ай бұрын

@@FiresplitterSpeedrun is that another excuse I see? Why does this matter if they REALLY landed on the moon in 19sum it’s 2024. Tell me why we can’t do it again. We are supposed to progress not regress 🤣

@FiresplitterSpeedrun

4 ай бұрын

@@on19s I answered specifically to why there was no pictures taking during the lunar night and that is therefore the context I reply in. Idk what you are on about though lol. You might want to ask people actually working on NASA about that because I am not in charge of their decissions.

The Camera man never dies

@cutiebunnyamber3447

9 ай бұрын

another NPC comment unrelated to thr video, good job.

@Staticmess007

8 ай бұрын

@@cutiebunnyamber3447 Your response is generic like your NPC comment 😂

@cutiebunnyamber3447

8 ай бұрын

@@Staticmess007 stop referring to yourself

@Jackmerius_Tacktheritrix5733

8 ай бұрын

This makes no sense.

@LAKush90

8 ай бұрын

@@cutiebunnyamber3447You're a grown man pretending to be a anime female character, you're most likely on meds and not allowed around elementary schools....

Why can we do it again? Why can’t we communicate like they did back than? lol

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

No plans to go back and redo Apollo. They completed those missions. 6 of them. Saturn V is now obsolete and scrapped . Artemis is a different mission with new rocketses and suits and all kinds of stuff to figure out.

Jeez the view of the stars from the moon has to be insanely intense compared to what I’m used to

@tubecated_development

10 күн бұрын

Not in daylight

But if you actually listen to the Apollo 11 interview, they even say they didn't see any stars

@thefolks5199

9 ай бұрын

Which makes sense because they aren’t beneath the stars anymore.

@arewecrazyyet

8 ай бұрын

Their visors where tinted so that they wouldn't go blind.

@sewy2293

5 ай бұрын

It makes sense as same happens on earth. Try looking to the sky at bright night in the big city you most certainly will not see any stars. Then go to the countryside where there is not that amount of light as in the cities and you’ll notice that now you can see them. It happens because there a large amount of light sources in towns and it kinda deflects all the star light that is coming from space. Same goes on the surface of the moon because of the Sun

@SS-yx5hm

2 ай бұрын

In that interview why is it that they all seem depressed, nervous and not wanting to talk about one of the most historic events in human history? It’s very odd behavior making it seem like they didn’t just come back from being on the moon.🤦🏻🤷🏻‍♂️

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

Ай бұрын

@@SS-yx5hm Do you mean the Apollo 11 post flight interview which took place after the 3 weeks of quarantine where the 3 Apollo 11 astronauts answer many questions while smiling, laughing and cracking jokes with the reporters? Have you ever bothered to actually watch it yourself? Take care.

One thing ive never heard argued....why didn't the Soviets call them out? They certainly would have if it was fake.

@skophansen9525

8 ай бұрын

Read Anthony Ciril Sutton's books from 70s and 80s and you will figure it out. US's and SSSR's oligarchy were cooperating together behind people's back. Obviously, you can't jear about that in Legacy media.

@branako2205

8 ай бұрын

Probably because the US has something on Russia and China too. After over 50 years why hasn’t another rover or orbiter or satellite taken a picture of the flag and original moon rover? Even the Hubble telescope could probably take a decent picture of them.

@vijayvijay4123

8 ай бұрын

Honour among the scoundrels

@erniemckracken1593

8 ай бұрын

Worlds a stage full of actors. WCW wrestling and politics, no difference.

@bjornfeuerbacher5514

8 ай бұрын

@@skophansen9525 Yes, dude. Something like the Cold War never happened. Sure. :D

Plus, it's daytime on the moon!!

People start to doubt when so many lies are thrown among a few truths😮

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

What did NASA supposedly ‘lie’ about?

@theonlyspoon

Ай бұрын

Sure... I get that. Still happened though.

I have said that for years. When the Flat earth people yell that the images look fake and cgi I always point out how extremely easy it would be for NASA to fake stars or shadows in a picture if they wanted to. So the fact there aren't any stars in the picture is actually more of a proof than they think it is.

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

Flat Earth people in general can (in their heads) square away anything round. Physics means nothing to them. It’s (Flat Earthism) is more like a religion. Evidence means nothing to them. The scientific method even less. They are IME most often anti-science.

@jaymike3302

Ай бұрын

It wouldn't be easy to fake stars all in the correct positions.

@Motorata661

Ай бұрын

Also there is a reason why it looks fake, we are accustomed to things to lose definition in the distance, in the moon such things don't happen so it looks fake

@topherkrock

Ай бұрын

@@jaymike3302, that's not true though. The distance to the stars wouldn't change much, so they could have simply inserted the right ones in the right spots. Instead, they stuck with the truth.

@jaymike3302

Ай бұрын

@@topherkrock They wouldn't have to re-calculate. But it would still be a lot of work to insert the stars accurately on a background.

Try to take a nice picture of the night sky on earth! It’s hard! 😂

@Agarwaen

9 ай бұрын

try to do it during the day instead, as the case was during apollo lunar EVAs.

@ebreshea

9 ай бұрын

@@Agarwaen Earth has a heavy atmosphere, which scatters light from the sun, basically washing out whatever light might be coming from the stars. Neil's point is about apertures, which is something completely different.

@Agarwaen

9 ай бұрын

@@ebreshea except no. stars wouldn't be be visible to your eyes during the day if we lacked an atmosphere either. only specific wavelengths are even affected by this scattering, so there's no reason why stars wouldn't be visible if they were supposed to be on the surface of the moon. the limiting factor is how much light can get to the sensor (or film) and if you're going to take photos in a situation where most light is FAR stronger then you just have to set up your camera in the manner that means you just cannot catch faint objects like stars, unless you want the rest of your image to be almost entirely white.

@philipm3173

9 ай бұрын

Long exposure

@DanielleAlessandra

9 ай бұрын

How cool would it be if a billionaire made a hotel of the moon I would definitely go instead of spending $250,000 to go visit the titanic I would go to the moon hotel any day of the week you get to be in a spaceship you get to view earth from the moon that sounds like a lot more fun

They are smart enough to know that, too.

The more you defend a lie, the angrier you become.” - Mitch Albom

@Tuface_Killa97

9 ай бұрын

Never heard this one

@Clicks-Prosper

9 ай бұрын

Naw

@silvercenturion4214

9 ай бұрын

Neil isn’t lying

@cyberpunk11x

9 ай бұрын

Neil Tyson is an actor.

@rogemillecastillo3183

9 ай бұрын

Made up quote...

It’s 2023 and they still haven’t gone back

@ururzu4irduzjjz

9 ай бұрын

Supposedly, we are going back next year. A canadian, a woman and a black guy. Inclusion and what not 😂

@lifehappensfast_21

9 ай бұрын

You know they claim to have lost the technology to get there. 😅😅😅

@atuck6082

9 ай бұрын

Frozen water has been found there so yes, we'll be back.

@bkh5746

9 ай бұрын

@@atuck6082i wouldnt want to go any time close to a eclipse😂turn ya into moon dust for the next buzz lightyear to walk on

@gabedrinkswater

9 ай бұрын

@@ururzu4irduzjjz they arent going back "for inclusion" they are going back to set up a permanent base for going to mars. do your research before you speak your sorry mind

I mean to be fair, Neil doesn’t understand photography either. It has nothing to do with the aperture in the way he explained it… it’s just that they exposed the image for the bright sunlight and the camera can’t capture the dim stars in the background.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

Which is what he said: “The terrain is so bright from the Sun, the aperture of the camera closes down and cannot register the light of dim things such as the stars in the sky” (although he incorrectly/simply explained it as if they used automatic aperture control, but they manually-adjusted the aperture) The guidelines were printed for the astronauts on the top of the Hasselblad film magazines. The shutter speed was set to 1/250 (another limiting factor for dim objects such as stars) and the f-stop recommendations were ƒ/5.6 for objects in shadow and ƒ/11 for objects in the sun.

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development The original poster couldn't even finish their sentence.

@Bledder

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development Right but you both are overcomplicating it. Just say the camera was exposed for the bright sunlight so the camera couldn’t capture both the terrain and the stars at the same time

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@Bledder That’s exactly how I would describe it to a layperson. My added detail was nothing to do with a simple explanation.

Whenever I hear someone say, "If we went to the moon why did we never go back?" I facepalm so hard. (We had 6 missions to the moon and 12 men walked on the moon). You develop such strong opinions about the moon, but you can't type "how many times did we go to the moon" into Google.

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

They are just parrots. They see something they like (conspiracy theory) and then just parrot it. They don’t have any genuine interest or curiosity. These are NPCs in a troll’s online game.

@nervonica4952

Ай бұрын

If we really had been to the moon and we should have been on Mars a long time ago

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@nervonica4952 if we really had supersonic passenger planes then, we should have hypersonic passengers planes now. But we have neither…

@webeewatchin1977

Ай бұрын

Yeah 50 years ago. That is plenty of time to go back if they actually went.

@BR-ez3mk

Ай бұрын

@@nervonica4952 it's a lot farther away than the moon. Venus is closer. The problem is we don't have a lot of motivation to do it. It would cost so much money and probably yield less results than rovers. That's why space programs favor satellites, rovers, and other unmanned missions. Despite that there are still people trying to get to mars, but I think it's futile. We can't terriform mars because it's core is dead and it doesn't have strong enough magnetic poles to shield it from deadly cosmic rays. Venus is more earth like, but it's an absolute hellscape due to runaway green house effects from increased solar brightness. Even then I think it would be easier to terriform Venus. Building air tight bases on mars just isn't really practical right now due to how expensive it would be with little benefit. I think more likely we could have bases orbiting Venus or earth or mars. Hopefully it's possible to colonize another planet so we aren't wiped out by an earthly catastrophy.

When I was in 9th grade my earth science teacher showed us a documentary claiming that the moon landing was fake

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

Shouldn’t have been teaching. I’d follow that up.

@heresy3573

Ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development Yea Id agree

@Angel.-dust3620

Ай бұрын

That’s ridiculous

@CrixusHeart

Ай бұрын

I believe we did go to the moon (I think) but it's always good to be skeptical. 😊

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

@@CrixusHeart most people in these comments don’t seem to know the difference between rational, scientific skepticism vs cynical, ignorant incredulity + gullibility (aka “parroting stuff I read on TikTok and then doubling-down on it forever”) .

It's funny how the comment section still believes NASA forgot to fake the stars in the photographs. People are wild.

@xTROLLINGx

5 ай бұрын

Wait until they realize the astronauts never filmed the earth when all they had to do was point their cameras up since they had landed on the near side of the moon. They couldn't fake the earth in a film but they could with a still image.

@tubecated_development

5 ай бұрын

@@xTROLLINGxhow would live footage of the Earth have looked any better/different than a still? What film cameras were they using?

@xTROLLINGx

5 ай бұрын

@@tubecated_development it would have looked the same way as when they recorded themselves on the Rover they have more footages of that Rover than they do of Earth.

@tubecated_development

5 ай бұрын

@@xTROLLINGx You didn’t answer my question tho. What camera was that? And what would they have gained by filming the Earth with that camera vs the stills camera/s?

@xTROLLINGx

5 ай бұрын

​@@tubecated_development Two cameras were equipped with 60-millimeter focal length lenses; the other had a high-resolution 500-millimeter lens enough to record the earth if they had pointed it up. They would have gained a new perspective from the moon of earth to share with the world since they were all about winning the cold war and not for an actual accomplishment which is why they haven't returned to the moon if they even can because who deletes a blueprint that can help humanity in their future.

Those people worry me, we coulda fired a metal ball at the moon in 1949.

We did not go to the moon, the astronauts did.

"no amount of evidence can persuade an idiot ."

@patrickjane2024

3 ай бұрын

well the more people question the narrative the better.americans like to claim this is not fake to make themselves look superior than other countries.

@topherkrock

3 ай бұрын

​@@patrickjane2024, there's a difference between "questioning the narrative" and "rejecting the truth". Answer me this: what is the narrative that you are questioning? What is the purpose of your questioning? If you want the truth, should you reject all the answers that don't fit your personal bias or should you question your bias if it doesn't fit the answers you're getting?

@shy404usernotfound

3 ай бұрын

​@@patrickjane2024 but..... we DID do it. If saying that as a fact, makes you & your country "feel" inferior, then that's a you problem. Not ours.

@Soul.Is.Willing

3 ай бұрын

Nasa in hebrew means to deceive

@tubecated_development

3 ай бұрын

@@patrickjane2024The more people get to undermine the truth, the more people will claim that it was ‘fake’. And the more Americans will hate their own people.

The bottom dude is a lizard person lmao 😂

@5.56NATO

2 ай бұрын

Bros face looks crazy

@Kenwise3395

2 ай бұрын

What does that mean

@5.56NATO

Ай бұрын

@@Kenwise3395 only a lizard person wouldn’t understand

Maybe NASA is throwing a curve ball ??

@tubecated_development

Ай бұрын

Most of these comments come from people for whom shoelaces are a ‘curve ball’. Some of them struggle with Velcro. Allegedly 🫠

@Neil does that mean that with modern cameras and HDR or long exposure etc on the moon it will be possible to take images showing a beautiful background like the Milky Way etc?

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

29 күн бұрын

You may be interested in knowing that the Apollo astronauts actually took some 178 photographs of stars from the lunar surface while using the appropriate equipment and settings for this task. Take care.

To people like that, ask them to take a snapshot of a group of friends on a clear dark night and let them ponder why they can’t see them stars either. Then get them to set a long exposure- oh look, there they are.

@bananian

6 ай бұрын

It would mean his friends are fake.

@SzilardBartalos-bs8bt

6 ай бұрын

​@@bananianbest comment ever

@AdrianOkay

6 ай бұрын

They would try again and again with different permutations of hardware until they manage to get the stars in the picture, because of a very deep problem of selective bias

@josephnjuki3086

5 ай бұрын

​@@AdrianOkay😮

@h2w25

5 ай бұрын

Imagine believing in anything NASA has ever put out…

I still can't understand how they got there with "ancient" tech and in 2024 it's so challenging.

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

They aren’t planning to redo the Apollo mission, any more than they planning to go to the bottom of the ocean in homemade submarine like they did in 1960. but what happened to the Titan submersible last year? New technology doesn’t mean automatically safe and doable.. Technology has moved on, and so have the challenges. longer missions, new trajectories to different parts of space, diff regions of the moon. All of the microtechnology and new comms requirements present their own challenges. Especially around life-support systems. microtechnology is more vulnerable to space radiation. There is also the not inconsiderable fact that Apollo took about 2% of the federal budget - while the last moon mission was about 0.1% of that.

@Foolish188

2 ай бұрын

The Apollo program was incredibly expensive. And convincing Congress that NASA needed both the Saturn Rocket program and the Space Shuttle proved to be impossible.

@The1QwertySky

2 ай бұрын

Today there are a lot of regulation holding us back, and also today there is no reason to go there. Back them they wanted to beat so iet union in the race

@lancehaysom47

2 ай бұрын

All to do with $$. They spent a lot of money back then govt backed. Now it is private money and relatively a lot smaller $$

@tubecated_development

2 ай бұрын

@@lancehaysom47 Is there a ‘private’ space company which doesn’t have NASA as their primary customer?

If you look up at the night sky literally every single thing out there is a sphere, but some people think we’re not on one 🤦🏻‍♂️

Reminder that the reason we can’t see the entire Milky Way in most of the world is because cities have so much artificial light that the sky is actually bright enough to prevent the stars from being seen

RIP Stanley Kubrick

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

7 ай бұрын

Kubrick's family have repeatedly rebuked the outlandish fantasy that he had something to do with faking the Apollo Landings and have expressed their disgust at those who spread these lies. His daughter Vivian has asked conspiracy theorists (she refers to them as "malicious cranks") to stop using her fathers name in this way and said that what they say is "is manifestly a grotesque lie". Her open letter to moon landing deniers is easily found online. Please think about this and respect the family's wishes. Take care.

@chrisfrancis9555

7 ай бұрын

😂 exactly 👏

@Carntheswans

6 ай бұрын

Lol 😂

@markanthonycuyos29

6 ай бұрын

And RIP BILL KAYSING....

@jerryeberts3726

6 ай бұрын

Don’t drag Stanley into your ridiculous lunacy. Yes, lunacy, geddit?

Buzz Aldrin punched a guy out for giving him a hard time about man landing on the moon. I cannot fault Mr. Aldrin for having had enough!

@seanmckenna4155

9 ай бұрын

Buzz didn't hit that clown hard enough 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

@dryrotjunkieco1988

9 ай бұрын

He also said it was fake, soo....

@grahamyates2490

9 ай бұрын

@@dryrotjunkieco1988 who, Aldrin said the moon landing was fake?? No, no he certainly didn't. Typical conspiracists are either confused, careless, or outright lying.

@fardman7310

9 ай бұрын

​@@dryrotjunkieco1988it was edited lol

@dryrotjunkieco1988

9 ай бұрын

@@fardman7310 - No it wasn't. But sleep better thinking what you will. He's said it at least twice. Once on talk show, another time speaking to a child.