You're right. Kubrick was a perfectionist. That's why, when NASA asked him to fake the Moon landings, he insisted that they do it on location.

@michaelpettersson4919

Жыл бұрын

Lol. Reminds me of a rather humorous time travel novel I read about a viking movie being shot "on location" with real vikings and they still got criticised for the bad special effects and outfits.

@ilkeadrall710

Жыл бұрын

You comment that in other video. Pls be more original. You can describe the same facts with different words (synonyms).

@donlebo6824

Жыл бұрын

@@michaelpettersson4919 Hey, Michael, what's the title of that book? Sounds really good and funny.

@lukekingsland5851

Жыл бұрын

@@donlebo6824 I am also curious, a quick Google suggest "The Technicolour Time Machine"?

@donlebo6824

Жыл бұрын

@@lukekingsland5851 That looks like the one. Thanks. I'll definitely have to read that. That one would make a great movie.

I think the biggest one is the Soviet Union congratulated the US on it. If the Soviets had any reason to suspect it was fake don't you think they would have called the Americans out?

@andrewboyer7544

Жыл бұрын

Underrated comment. They had every reason to deny we did it. We nearly eliminated the human race with them just a few years prior. There is no way they would have admitted we did it if it was fake.

@ourkeving

Жыл бұрын

You'd think. I only recently found a branch of the conspiracy: The U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R., among other countries, are part of the New World Order. Always a side step. But this video is good for the basics lol

@bernthenrikwallin6609

Жыл бұрын

Germany's rocket scientists were split by USA and Soviet, and they talked to each other. Very easy to see why that happened: If you are in charge of a US agency, company or a Soviet branch, you want results, and the German experts say they can only give you the results if they can talk to their German experts on the other side. Why doesn't the enemies of the establishment call out that the Epstein client list isn't released? Elon Musk did, but why not Russia?

@tevarinvagabond1192

Жыл бұрын

@@thepsychicspoon5984 Lol, if the USSR was part of it, that means all countries that do anything in space nowadays are part of it too... it's so ridiculous how the moon conspiracy logic goes, essentially you'd have to believe in a one world government that controls everything as that's the only way there would be all these government space programs AND private space companies supposedly trying to dupe everyone and working together. No wonder these guys don't listen to reason, if they believe in the whole Illuminati thing

@andrewboyer7544

Жыл бұрын

@@thepsychicspoon5984 its astonishing anyone could think that two countries that nearly annihilated human life over their rivalry would magically be together on this... some folks are... simple.

Doesn't mention that many amateur radio operators intercepted the radio transmissions from Apollo 11 by pointing their highly directional radio antennas toward the moon.

I still say the best evidence for us having landed on the moon is that the Soviet union didn't dispute it.

@Flight_of_Icarus

4 ай бұрын

Fortunately the Soviet Union hadn't yet adopted the modern Russian tactic to just spit in the face of reality and deny it anyway. Wouldn't be surprised if many of these modern "conspiracy theorists" are just Russian troll farmers out to correct that old mistake of the Soviet Union.

@JefferyTurpin-cm1tk

4 ай бұрын

I'm sure they did. Remember, you just got told they didn't. And of course, they magically did later too.

@harrygalloway2117

4 ай бұрын

couldn't agree more.

@timpatrick2109

3 ай бұрын

​@JefferyTurpin-cm1tk I guess that's why Soviet newspapers and media reported the moon landings, tho they didn't make a big deal of it of course.

@cosmin-ionutsmaranda-catan5823

2 ай бұрын

About 2 day prior to the launch of Apollo 11 the USSR launched the Luna 15 mission. One of the mission goals was to monitor Apollo 11 flight, Moon orbit insertion and Moon landing. There is also a photo taken by Buzz Aldrin showing Luna 15 orbiting the Moon above Tranquility base. The Soviets knew that NASA landed on the Moon. Luna 15 was sending information about this back to Earth.

Without watching yet, the biggest contemporary evidence I know of is that none of the mission transmissions were encrypted, everyone could hear everything, and anyone with a simple directional antenna could track them in the sky all the way there and back again. So, at the very least, something went to the Moon, stayed there for a couple days, and came back.

@slyaspie4934

Жыл бұрын

Yeah and the Russians would've been all over it calling the US out for lying, it'd would've been propaganda gold for them catching NASA, and the USA as whole lying about this

@ryandean3162

Жыл бұрын

@@slyaspie4934 Ah, that just shows how far the conspiracy goes! But yes, anyone with an axe to grind could have just easily pointed out that the transmissions weren't coming from the Moon if they weren't coming from there.

@geodkyt

Жыл бұрын

And the time delay means that they couldn't route the signals back to Earth for responses, which means that transmissions where the astronauts *had* to respond in real time, *had* to oroginate on the craft without being able to rely on a pre-eecorded message. Meaning, there had to be something on the spacecraft that was capable of being able to simulate a normal human being in natural speech in real time. We can *barely* pull that off today with modern computers, and the amount of computing power required would have been several times larger and heavier than the entire spacecraft we sent to the Moon, if built with 1969 technology. And the software development - the very *basics* of the necessary algorithms were still being developed a mere 20 years ago.

@deerejohn7209

Жыл бұрын

@@ryandean3162 : Down the Rabbit Hole. Go ask Alice kzread.info/dash/bejne/p5tmp8WQm8WYZqw.html

@steve-ph9yg

Жыл бұрын

I have a better one multiple universities with a radio telescope tracked the mission and Cambridge has a printout of it’s tracking that perfectly match’s the Eagle’s landing showing Armstrong and Aldrin looking for a clear landing zone. Then you have the laser reflectors left on the moon that you can still bounce a laser beam off the moon today.

Do you remember the time we thought the stupidity was caused by a lack of access to information? Yeah, it wasn't that.

@BeesWaxMinder

Жыл бұрын

😂👍

@milo-qh7cv

Жыл бұрын

you are right. the fact you comment here proves it

@wolcek

Жыл бұрын

@@milo-qh7cv ditto

@semoby8049

Жыл бұрын

@@milo-qh7cv not really, get better insults

@costaliberta5969

Жыл бұрын

"a fetus is a living being", what sort of info can you derive from that? if you are illiterate you fall for it. and.or stupid.

They are the same people who believe in invisible friend without hesitation 😂

"I don't trust what they tell me, but I'll believe this random guy who made a video on Facebook."

@gmain1977

10 ай бұрын

We did not go Americans are FOS

@preschoolenglishwithtumtum4283

8 ай бұрын

​@@gmain1977 Proving the point being made. Believing a questionable claim in the face of mountains of evidence doesn't make you smart, quite the opposite.

@onnowesterman6286

8 ай бұрын

@@gmain1977 Nasa landed on the moon so yes they did go that is a fact.

@tommasotiberi5666

5 ай бұрын

Evidence for how they could survive radiation then, please...

@IDK-hx7xf

Ай бұрын

@@tommasotiberi5666Their ship was shielded as much as possible to protect them from severe radiation exposure, allowing the Apollo astronauts to go through the Van Allen Belt without suffering from any major radiation exposure.

It's kind of weird that the moon landing didn't become a US annual holiday, considering the massive achievement it was.

@ronjones-6977

Жыл бұрын

Sure, 12 days after INDEPENDENCE DAY. That'd make a lot of sense.

@Loralanthalas

Жыл бұрын

​@@ronjones-6977 horrid timing for holidays GREAT TIMING for 1969

@gives_bad_advice

Жыл бұрын

the american people lost interest in the space program after apollo 11, except for a few days when apollo 13 was looking like a goner.

@vertyisprobablydead

Жыл бұрын

That would make it seem like we thought it was a big deal.

@ronjones-6977

Жыл бұрын

@@Loralanthalas I was 6 when the first moon landing happened. It was so cool. I remember on the later Apollo missions, my teacher wheeling the tv into the classroom so we could watch it.

In 1969, getting a clear picture on your tv set was a mission in itself.

@tornfrayed4977

Жыл бұрын

Underrated comment. When I was a kid, playing with matches got you in serious trouble. Screwing with the antenna dial got you killed 😁😁😁

@jaqua7732

Жыл бұрын

And at that same time, without even the technology to produce a Gameboy or a thumb drive, we somehow manage to fly back and forth to the Moon 6 times, right

@Loralanthalas

Жыл бұрын

​@@jaqua7732 tech may help you life your life, but billions of us lived lives without, Hon.

@marekmkm744

Жыл бұрын

This is the reason they "went there". Today the 4 k tv with full set of RGB colours makes it impossible. Thats all about it.

@terryrichmond4723

Жыл бұрын

@@jaqua7732 😂😂😂😂

1. I watched the launch in person. 2. As an aerospace engineer, I calculated the orbital mechanics and calculated the rocket size myself. 3. Anyone could buy the radio equipment to track the progress themselves. 4. I was able to touch the rocket in the VAB. 5. I knew several of the astronautics. 6. I knew several engineers that worked the rocket motors, rocket and the capsule. 7. There are Chinese photos of the Apollo landing sites! Anything else?

@TheDJMeyer85

13 күн бұрын

Those are facts and in case you weren’t aware, conspiracy theorists tend to ignore them

@jabe3780

3 күн бұрын

I especially love the high definition photos of all 3 Lunar rovers we left on the Moon. The Hubble and Webb have forever dispelled whether or not we landed on the Moon. Which Lunar rover picture is your favorite?

@johnmurphy9636

3 күн бұрын

'Thanks Baxter. Nice to hear from real people and not anonymous internet nutbags who denigrate real peoples amazing achievements.

on the point of no stars in the photographs/footage taken on the moon, take a picture of the night sky with your phone and tell me how many stars you see, even with 2020s technology

@karicummings9229

24 күн бұрын

Buzz even admitted that they didn't go to the moon, when he was interviewed by an 8 year old girl. He said that is not a question an 8 year old girl should be asking, he because we didn't go there! Look it up SHEEPLE

@mortmain5411

24 күн бұрын

Not to mention the landing was on the "daytime" side...

@derekcoaker6579

16 күн бұрын

They don't understand how Light works...it's why you had people this week wondering why you didn't see the Moon approach the Sun. Sorry, but they're fucking idiots.

@jonnamechange6854

14 күн бұрын

@@mortmain5411 Then why did Sir Patrick Moore's question in the post mission press conference, regarding what the constellations looked like, draw such different answers and recollections? Moore was not the type you would expect to be ignorant about such things.

@renaissanceman7145

12 күн бұрын

​​@@jonnamechange6854 Because he wasn't asking about stars visible to the naked eye or through their cameras but a separate experiment. Edit - How many stars can you see during the day here on Earth? Compared to the overwhelming light from the sun stars are simply too faint to see. On the dark side of the Moon I'm sure each Command Module Pilot was treated to a glorious view of stars.

The survival of the Apollo 13 astronauts to me was more unbelievable than the moon landing. How those men were able to make it back despite the odds is just amazing.

@Schmidtelpunkt

Жыл бұрын

The odds were not that bad in the first place. While the accident itself was not anticipated, they were prepared for a range of problems and the mission was set up accordingly.

@MORCOPOLO0817

Жыл бұрын

That was another drama enacted to give "legitimacy" to the so called "moon landings".

@mts7274

Жыл бұрын

You bought into the Hollywood version that only a miracle could save the crew, but NASA has so many scenarios/redundancies written into the planning of the space missions. It's one of the reasons that the costs were so astronomical for each moon landing.

@dfuher968

Жыл бұрын

Thats what gets me every time. Not that the Apollo 13 astronauts survived. But that the moon landing itself has so many virulent conspiracy theories around it, 1 more unbelievable and selfcontradictory than the next, but somehow, the conspiracy theorist has nothing, when it comes to Apollo 13. Never heard about a single conspiracy theory about Apollo 13. So apparently theyre just fine with Apollo 13 flying to the moon and overcoming their accident and making it back to Earth, but when it comes to the last part, landing on the moon, it suddenly not even possible to get there....

@k.c.r.5974

Жыл бұрын

Hollywood. Watch the edits when they supposedly returned from space

My aunt was Wehner von Braun’s secretary and my dad was a junior engineer on Apollo. The stories they told about their work are more than sufficient for me (along with the mountain of actual evidence). My dad (rest his soul) would laugh about these people after a few beers. Crackpots gonna crackpot, no matter what.

@YzerWings

Жыл бұрын

Still dont know how I feel about the US selling its soul (using von Braun) to help us land on the moon. However, if we werent going to take him, the soviets would have.

@bcfortenberry

Жыл бұрын

@@YzerWings I also have deep misgivings. Not surprisingly, that part was never brought up much in family retellings.

@yerma6847

Жыл бұрын

Want to know exactly why the kubrick theory is actually their downfall he always scouted his own locations and refused to film on a set unless absolutely necessary so either he didn't film it or he did film it on the actual moon

@LazyIRanch

Жыл бұрын

There were something like 300,000 professional people who had some involvement in the Apollo missions, so it would be impossible to fool them all, or to keep them all from revealing secrets. My dad was one of them, an electrical engineer who specialized in microwave communications. He was part of the team at Collins Radio who built the spacesuits and the radio equipment built into them, and the communication equipment aboard the capsule. I remember being 8 years old, watching and listening when the landing occured and what a big deal it was when we heard those famous first words spoken from the Moon. I was older when I learned that my dad was involved in creating the equipment. He was a ham radio operator since he was a teenager which is why he wanted to work at Collins. That company started out making the best ham radio equipment. He listened to the communications just about the whole time, which I thought was boring as hell at eight years old because I didn't understand what it was.

@deerejohn7209

Жыл бұрын

Kudos, if only I could have heard half of the stories you have heard. Lucky you !

My favorite is when people talk about the flag "flapping in the breeze". 1. It looks completely unnatural to the movement of real flag on Earth. 2. The top of the flag clearly has an internal support since it never moves and remains straight throughout it's handling. 3. How can there be a "breeze" if this was supposedly shot on a sound stage?

@msidc1238

10 ай бұрын

Not only that but the flag stays still for the next 2 hours of the broadcast once they stop touching it.

@reviewflicks

10 ай бұрын

@@msidc1238 there is plenty of footage of the flag moving without anyone touching it, clear evidence that the wind is manipulating it

@chaosclg

10 ай бұрын

@@reviewflicks wind on the moon? 🥲

@reviewflicks

10 ай бұрын

@@chaosclg it demonstrates that they can not possible be on the moon 😒

@msidc1238

10 ай бұрын

@@reviewflicks Only shortly after thet stopped touching it.

I watched the moon landing on TV. I was nearly 4 years old at the time. In the USA, it was 20/07/1969. Here in Australia, it was on 21/07/1969. My older sister turned 12. Once I was old enough to learn about this, I had a very big interest in astronomy. Even now, there are times when I go outside at night, & look at the moon with either binoculars, or if I want a closer look, I then set up my high powered Celestron telescope. Looking into space with these is very interesting. One night, I was going to visit friends, & I saw a bright light moving across the sky. I was asked about it, & I said it was the ISS. I got in my car, switched on my Amateur transceiver, dialed up the frequency, & tried contacting them. I wasn't fast enough. As far as I know, Edwin Aldrin is still alive. In my opinion, the moon landings are a real feat of engineering. I hold those involved in awe.

@edryba4867

10 ай бұрын

Some years ago, in the 1990’s, I was working as a Director at Financial News Network, an American Cable TV Network. I was Directing a show called “The American Entrepreneur”, and on one episode, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin was the sole guest. At about 20 minutes to air, I walked past the “green room” and noticed that Buzz was sitting in there ALONE! So I came in, introduced myself and told him that I’d always wanted to shake hands with a man who had walked on the moon! He was a fine fellow, and we were able to talk for about ten minutes before I had to get to the control room and get ready to go on-air. To this day, I have no idea what his business was, but I’ll always remember having spoken with Buzz (and what a small human he is!). All the astronauts were very small in size, because every ounce cost thousands to get into orbit.

@frederickd.provoncha8671

10 ай бұрын

As of today 28-06-2023, Edwin Aldrin is still alive.

@christophermarshall5765

10 ай бұрын

@@frederickd.provoncha8671 thank you for the updated info on Buzz Aldrin. This is awesome to know. I hope he lives for a lot more years to come.

@dogwalker666

9 ай бұрын

@@edryba4867 wow, I am a bit jealous. you are lucky to meet buzz in person.

@mariojanaf5474

9 ай бұрын

You watched the transmission from Earth.

Slight correction... All in all, *nine* Apollo missions *visited* the moon. Three of them did not land - two because they didn't plan to, and one because of an in-flight emergency.

@healdiseasenow

Жыл бұрын

They landed on the moon because an emergency? wow....

@healdiseasenow

Жыл бұрын

One thing about being on another planet if there's an emergency. you die, you have a flat tire on Earth you're good have a flat tire on another planet you die

@nsayer

Жыл бұрын

@@healdiseasenow You have greatly misunderstood my comment. Go back and read it again.

@nsayer

Жыл бұрын

@@healdiseasenow That depends greatly on the nature of the emergency, of course. Apollo 13 suffered a very, very serious failure and yet everyone survived. Had the same thing happened on Apollo 8, it likely would have ended very differently because there was no LM available.

@slysneakly6465

Жыл бұрын

@expattaffy1 Shadows facing two ways? Of course there's nothing even remotely reflective anywhere near them to perhaps cause those shadows. Wow - damning evidence there.

The Soviets had teams of their best scientists, photographic experts, and so on, analyze every speck of information in an effort to debunk the Moon landings. If they had found even the tiniest discrepancy, they would have announced it to the four corners of the world.

@tylerdurden4608

Жыл бұрын

Well that sound logic but what about this. How do you think the rest of the world would think of Soviet Union of they told it was fake while rest of the world was 100% certain it was real? Soviet Union would be the worlds joke. Also in the early 70s Soviet and USA cooperated a lot in space so all that would be ruined if they say it was fake. Im not saying the landing was real or fake but the Soviet Union point people make actually doesn't make any sense.

@chrisperrien7055

Жыл бұрын

There is always the thing, that Casey might have been a paid Soviet agent too besides a charlatan

@puppiesarepower3682

Жыл бұрын

Putin would've been more than happy to have released any Apollo Hoax material by now. And he's been there for 20+ years.

@jasonking7736

Жыл бұрын

you think any corner of the world would of aired anything Soviet lol? really? ..

@abbycross90210

Жыл бұрын

@@jasonking7736 the Soviets said lots of crazy crap that was aired all the time. There are more countries on the planet than just the US and Russia/USSR. Even if the US somehow successfully quashed any reports, other countries would've spoken up.

He was 39 and walked on the moon?! I’m 39 sitting here playing video games and eating Cheetos 😭

Camera film has a thing called "latitude". I was a photographer in highschool (68-70) and if you set your exposure for very bright items, you'd lose detail in the dark areas. At a basketball game, if you had black players and white players, you could not have detail in both faces without darkroom tricks. So we would "burn in" or "dodge out". For the black players, we would have a small cardboard disk on a wire and block the light to his face for part of the exposure making it look like he had a halo around his head. Burning in: e. g to show detail for a face with pale complexion with blond hair (dark on the negative) you take a piece of cardboard with a hole cutout and allow light to shine through for the face until you have detail making a halo of darkness around the face. Stars are so faint, you have to provide longer exposure at much larger apertures to get them to show up at all. If you expose to see detail on the bright surface of the moon, there's not way to get detail of the stars so the sky looks totally black!

@dogwalker666

9 ай бұрын

Exactly.

@zvast

9 ай бұрын

That's why there are no stars visible on Moon shots!

@Sertao2013

9 ай бұрын

If you look at the photo of Earth that was taken in 2015 from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter just 80 miles above the moons surface you can see the true scale of the Earth This was taken from the far side of the moon just imagine the view in the center of the moon . Don't you wonder why we don't have hundreds of photos from the moons surface with the view of the Earth like this ? Hello because we were never there or we would have . www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/earth_and_limb_m1199291564l_color_2stretch_mask_0.jpg

@JustJanitor

9 ай бұрын

That's really interesting. Thanks for sharing

@frederickbowdler8169

9 ай бұрын

if that was the case why didn't they take a huge piece of cardboard to cover sun and the moon so we could see the stars ????

I'm interested in stereo photography. When you photograph a scene, move to the side, and photograph the scene again, you can use that to create a stereograph and see the depth in the scene. I often do this with two frames from a movie when the camera moves sideways, and when this is done in a studio or sound stage the flat painted backdrop becomes completely obvious, just like you were there in the room with it. I have also done this with the Apollo pictures that they took of the distant landscape while cruising around on the LRV, and those objects are NOT on a flat painted backdrop. They extend away miles into the distance. Good luck faking that one. Edit- My gosh, so many people saying "Deserts exist on Earth, haha gotcha!" What I'm doing here is saying that the photos cannot have been taken in a sound stage. But this whole operation was your idea- you all need the sound stage because lunar photos look bizarre and unlike Earth. On Earth, you have shrubs all over the place even in a desert, and even if you clear them all out for miles, you can't hide the wind and water erosion that's all over the place. The Moon doesn't have wind and water erosion, but what it does have are a lot of craters and micrometeorite impacts that are missing from any desert on Earth. I fully believe that some of you all can't tell the difference, but remember the goal here would be to fool a well-trained, intelligent Russian geologist, and to them the differences would be obvious. And before you keep trying to @ me with some "aha, gotcha!" ask yourself this... The goal of the Moon Landings was to show up the Russians, right? But that can't be done with a simple TV broadcast. The Russians had these things called telescopes and RADAR, and they were able to see and track the Apollo missions from the ground. It's that simple. If they hadn't seen it with their own eyes, they would have called BS and publicly mocked the US. So any contrived conspiracy theory you come up with has to include the cooperation of the Russians. Also, any amateur astronomer with a telescope in the 1960's would have been able to track the modules for at least some distance, much as how amateur astronomers track satellites today. They wouldn't have the resolution to watch them all the way to the Moon, but we would be able to see that they were leaving Earth on a Moon-bound trajectory. How do you fake that one? I get the value of being skeptical, but try to spend some time disproving your own ideas for a change.

@freeearthcitizen7601

Жыл бұрын

Last I checked, Nevada extended for miles. Who says everything was filmed on a stage?

@CabbageSandwich

Жыл бұрын

@@freeearthcitizen7601 Even modern special effects would be HARD PRESSED to make a believable edit of film of the nevada desert that could pass for the moon.

@scott_meyer

Жыл бұрын

@Christa Simon They just make up crap and hope someone as gullible as they are fall for it.

@jamesmaybury7452

Жыл бұрын

I would love to see your research, nice research idea. Could your work be released as a ‘how I analysed’ and a 3D film? One claim is that the horizons are too low, so either the most distant part of a scene is quite close or with a lot of the moon buggy footage you have hills in the background. (The same hills in two different missions in two different locations) the star backdrop is completely lacking any artefacts apart from the famous ‘earth rise’ shot where differentiating between subtly different dark blacks show a rectangular box around the earth image. I don’t mind being convinced but your assertions don’t have much weight and are mostly debunking a straw man anyway.

@jocec3283

Жыл бұрын

@@jamesmaybury7452 Moon landing deniers seems to willingly forget that the Moon is much smaller than Earth, hence the horizon be much closer, also without atmospheric distortion, making it visually even closer.

Kubrick's special effects in 2001: A Space Odyssey were ground breaking for the time but they were still obviously animation. I don't see how NASA execs would think they could fool anyone.

After watching the Canadian lead engineers and designers from the Avro arrow project in tears about this project was enough for me to believe it. For anyone interested it was those avro arrow engineers that went on to help lead the gemini project, it was also a canadian company that manufactured the landing gear as the US didnt have machinery capable of it at this time. Canadian aviation is forever ingrained in this massive NA success

@cardinalRG

11 ай бұрын

Canadians contributed mightily to the US space program indeed, but no Canadian, nor any individual at all, "designed Gemini." Project Gemini resulted from the work of many.

@Usamaalbelda

10 ай бұрын

This is personal though

@rmack6824

10 ай бұрын

Note: as a Canadian proud of my heritage, I should point out that the landing ‘gear’ on the lunar modules consisted of 4 spindly legs that were designed to partially become crushed upon contact with the lunar surface. That was how they were designed to work. VERY advanced technology.

@williammann9176

10 ай бұрын

@Sevo actually the Quebec company that built the LM landing legs did not design them. They built them to NASA/Grumman specs. But they had the technology to built then and build them on budget. Following the Canadian government's cancellation of the Avro Arrow project in 1959, Jim Chamberlin led a team of 25 engineers from Avro who joined NASA's Space Task Group. This group eventually grew to 32 former Avro engineers, collectively known as the "Avro Group", who joined NASA and become emblematic of what many Canadians viewed as a brain drain to the United States. There were just as many Canadians working for NASA as there were Germans and Brits in top positions. But all most tend to talk about are the Germans. But when it comes right down to it, if it was not for the American drive to make this happen and bring in the best of the best from Canada, Germany, Britain and mostly the U.S. itself then it would not have happened. For the handful from other countries it was still mostly Americans that did it. I say this as a proud Canadian who is glad that we were of some help.

@Sevo-

10 ай бұрын

@@williammann9176 ooh well the more you know! Got more research to do apparently! Thanks for the correction friend! You're right the American push was huge, and inevitably brought us all in.

Buzz Aldrin punching that guy is one of the things that lives in my memories rent-free.

@cyberneticbutterfly8506

Жыл бұрын

He represented all sane humans in history giving a punch to the nutty conspiracy theorists out there.

@chris82z1

Жыл бұрын

Until one day he couldn't lie to a little girl. Buzz has been hinting that it was all a crock of crap his whole life.

@independentfreethinkeroutl2176

Жыл бұрын

Lol i was going to type what u said.... but add in the movie THE SHINNING the same director put in the movie trying to tell the public it was fake .. the same guy that produced the fake landing

@independentfreethinkeroutl2176

Жыл бұрын

Oh snap he mentioned the shinning Wow.. this guys knows his truth

@independentfreethinkeroutl2176

Жыл бұрын

And guess what . When the cia uses the term conspiracy theory you know your over the target

I was at a meeting with the Apollo 11 Mission Commander. Someone asked him "so was it hoax"? He replied "well, they sure fooled me".

@nguyendailam6703

Жыл бұрын

Gene Kranz?

@Lowonfuel

Жыл бұрын

Sarcasm... saying something they don't mean, leading on the interlocutor in a way that doesn't make them feel offended, or aware of the real meaning, sometimes it may be followed with a wink towards his acquaintances, coworkers, friends or family. So the meaning of the response is apparently agreeing with the interrogator but clearly not, for those with a brighter mentality.

@Lowonfuel

Жыл бұрын

In other words, Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.

@CulturalOasis

Жыл бұрын

@@JO-qn8gy not to mention they figured out how to make devices to breath, figured out transmission, made suits that could withstand leaving this atmospheric system and more within a few years of being an established part of the government? 😂

@Lowonfuel

Жыл бұрын

​@@CulturalOasis 1958 was the year they named the agency with a formal name, but it was doing the same work since they captured the first Nazi V2 rocket... Radio _"Transmission"_ had been dependably working since 1900. Work on space suits obviously began as soon as they fired the first V2 rocket into space and knew they had to get started to have the suit on time... and it was a simple variant of all the other suits that were being used for orbital missions, which included doing "spacewalks". Just because you missed it all, doesn't mean it never happened... your mind is just one of 7 billion on this planet, and only you know what's in it... so your ideas change nothing. Reality is what most people can witness as such.

There are all the photographs available on the March to the Moon and NASA websites. Super large RAW files, uncompressed. Plus all of the footage from various cameras from each mission. Thousands of pics and films. Many showing the complete descent to the moon's surface from over 47,000ft high to touch down. From 47,000ft above any surface, one can see hundreds of miles! All shot on analogue film with no edits. No flying bugs of any kind in any of the media. You try shining even one small torch in a desert and see how many bugs fly by continuously. The Lunar Rover footage shows 360 degrees and some shows them traversing over a mile, until the film cannister runs out. All with no movement of deep, sharp shadows, caused by one magnificent light source - the sun. No light drop-off in any of the photographs, over any of the terrain. It would be impossible to shoot those photographs in a studio or some 100 mile wide outdoor stage (again with no flying insects) Nine missions around the moon, with six landings and thousands of media files for foreign agents to ponder over. We didn't have digital recordings back then, nor CGI Chromo-key (blue or green screens) and not even Hollywood today, could shoot such enormous scenes with one gigantic light source. (Even two lights would make multiple shadows, given you could suspend such massive, powerful lighting miles above a studio set up, to create such hard shadows) Plus, all the highly detailed moon surface footage would have had to be mapped out and created perfectly - every divet, just in case oh, 40, 50 years later, the moon was photographed/filmed by modern hi-res cameras, from various other countries, including the USA's greatest rival...far easier to just go there....six times.

@thomassewell9602

15 күн бұрын

This comment takes the cake, if no one believes the moon landings were real then they could be considered delusional

@garwhite8872

10 күн бұрын

Don't be so gullible McFly and stop being so arrogant and thinking you're too smart to get dupped well you're not the fact that you still believe it says it all I apologize if I'm being rude but for me that's being extremely nice in well-mannered so again I apologize if I offended you

@SmoothbrainCriminal

10 күн бұрын

That pretty much sums it up.

@matthewrowell8518

8 күн бұрын

Very concise explanation with absolutely zero holes for the ignorant to try and pick apart. Explains why it has so few responses as when someone knows what they are taking about they normally turn and run. Well done mate

@johnmurphy9636

3 күн бұрын

You're darn tight Luke!

I think its critically important to ask questions, but in this case, facts are facts and we landed on the Moon. I really agree with others, this should be a national holiday. What an amazing achievement, "One Small step for man, one giant leap for mankind". We should celebrate the achievement and remember all whom were lost to make this and future flights possible to space.

@duggydugg3937

10 ай бұрын

brainwashing

@duggydugg3937

10 ай бұрын

one small step for man ; one giant leap for mankind rubbish. .. bullsmoke

@Shoelessjoe78

4 ай бұрын

​@@duggydugg3937mental health is just a phone call away.

@duggydugg3937

4 ай бұрын

@@Shoelessjoe78 oh clever ... fantasy inplace of evidence.. youll go far... milennnial ?

@mattmatt6572

4 ай бұрын

No holiday for the moon landing.. I think it most odd they not made a movie out of the moon landing. But that might just be because nasa has the copyright on that movie?

I love their Mitchel and Webb sketch were a shadowy government organization are trying to work out how to fake the moon landing. They decide the cheapest option is to fly to the moon and fake it there

@praetorian65

Жыл бұрын

Might it not be cheaper to just pop to the moon and fake the footage there? kzread.info/dash/bejne/gmqBsdCemKa1hdo.html

@charlesjmouse

Жыл бұрын

Indeed. Another favourite of mine is their Homeopathy A&E. kzread.info/dash/bejne/eoF7q8SId9ieoZM.html

@jonathanross149

Жыл бұрын

That same episode shows how much harder it is to fake several common conspiracy theoretical stories.

@ronbakker1300

Жыл бұрын

Just watched Mitchel and Webb , very funny

@TheBlackDogChronicles

Жыл бұрын

Precisely. "So we will be saving on....catering?"

One more proof. Some friends and I, working on a college graduate project, built a receiver and dish antenna and listened to Apollo 17 all the way back from the moon. We had to adjust the frequency as it it moved closer because of the Doppler Effect. This can’t be faked because the object has to be far away and moving fast.

@petethewrist

Жыл бұрын

Go on next you will say you saw video of them inside the craft. Lol hell they hardly had the tech to get us decent pictures yet you had the tech to follow them. Ha

@James-bw7rk

Жыл бұрын

@@petethewrist Not too bright, are you?

@petethewrist

Жыл бұрын

@@James-bw7rk if your IQ was half of mine your comment, might, mean something. But sorry for you you are prob one of the 86% of the population that has low IQs memory yes may be. But that's not good enough and you are to easy to fool.

@allanmogensen2122

Жыл бұрын

This guy seems to not know,how easy it is for a radio expert with rather simple radio gear,amp.and antenna,to listen IN on any found or known radio transmission,around Earth.

@joao3547

Жыл бұрын

@@petethewrist I feel bad for you

Simon and team: thanks for making this. Well done, and I especially appreciate the magnificent low key disdain in which you hold the conspiracy pushers.

@juliocortazar8143

11 ай бұрын

Do you really believe the navigation of the apollo was acomplished with a "supercomputer" with a processing speed of about 0.043 MHz and a memory capacity of about 36 kilobytes??? Thats what they say they used....

@BradPanoff

11 ай бұрын

@@juliocortazar8143 what's your point?

@juliocortazar8143

11 ай бұрын

@@BradPanoff My point is asking you the following: Do you really believe that the apollo made a journey to the moon and back with a navigational computer with less capacity than your cell phone?

@BradPanoff

11 ай бұрын

@@juliocortazar8143 Since I know how the system works: YUP.

@juliocortazar8143

11 ай бұрын

@@BradPanoff what system? The navigational system of a moon ship? Or the western propaganda system?

I worked on Apollo at MIT/IL, so I believe we actually went to the Moon and landed on the Moon. This video would be much better if there was text describing what the narrator was actually saying. He speaks very fast...

I worked with Boeing engineers while I was in the army, I met a gentleman who, as a brand new engineer, worked on the camera and transmission equipment to get the pictures from the moon to earth. They had completed the work and were in the “tweaking” phase when in Dec 68 the president made the following statement: “I can’t wait to see the ‘Red, White and Blue’ flying over the moon!” At which point the project lead freaked out because suddenly the specifications changed from black & white to color with less than 6 months to complete the engineering changes!! His comment was “yea, we all just moved into our offices and we worked around the clock, smoked several thousand cigarettes, drank thousands of gallons of coffee and are pbj sandwiches or catered food. Wives and girlfriends collected dirty laundry and delivered clean clothes. He paused for a moment, smiled and capped the story with “it wasn’t all ‘nose to the grindstone’, my first daughter was born in Jan 70…do the math.” We all laughed with him.

@barriewright6727

Жыл бұрын

Shame when history was being made it was filmed in black and white.

@badassmother1426

Жыл бұрын

😆 😂 Tell us who filmed the spaceship leaving and how the film made it back to earth to be televised.

@theblitz9

Жыл бұрын

@@badassmother1426 never heard of an automatic or remote control camera?

@brenatevi

Жыл бұрын

@@badassmother1426 Or radio?

@nade5557

Жыл бұрын

@@badassmother1426 goofy

I did my own orignal research on this. I compared the original Apollo 17 16mm ascent camera film footage to the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) photos. Spoiler alert - they match up precisely. Video on this is on my EEVdiscover channel.

@dogwalker666

Жыл бұрын

Indeed and a very good video it is too.

@stevenemert837

Жыл бұрын

@EEVblog - Great research, Dave! The LRO photos are a great resource. It's so cool seeing the landing sites, especially the Lunar Rover tracks in the Apollo 15, 16 and 17 landing sites.

@jocec3283

Жыл бұрын

@@stevenemert837 Dont worry. The deniers will claim its all fake...

@orchdork775

Жыл бұрын

What's the video called?

@stevenemert837

Жыл бұрын

@@jocec3283 Yeah, that's the sad part. Conspiracy theorists' beliefs can't be changed even with a preponderance of evidence.

I think a big part of why conspiracy takes off isn't factual but emotional. We like feeling like we have that golden story, that unique secret, that we're part of something special. And reality can seem boring sometimes. Just oh, guy meets girl, has baby, that grow ups to meet guy or girl to have baby. It's kinda boring when put like that. A nicer story is there are all these strange forces in the world all creating a web of secrets and lies, and it's not just in the books, its REAL. Biggest conspiracy indicator: consciously or unconsciously unsatisfied with the simplicity and repetition of real life. In my opinion. Solution: make real life interesting so you don't need a secret, or a story. Allow people to do extraordinary things, encourage people to pursue passions, not simply enter workforces, and slowly they will develop a desire for reality rather than fiction. Because reality will just be more exciting. I enjoyed the video a lot! I didn't actually know much about this whole debate!

Going to be cool when they land again with HD footage and people will still deny it

@DemonDrummer

Жыл бұрын

Sadly, you’re very likely right. 😕

@The__Gent

Жыл бұрын

Too bad that will never happen.

@DemonDrummer

Жыл бұрын

@@The__Gent You can…see the future now?

@nohbuddy1

Жыл бұрын

@@The__Gent They're landing in the next two years

@lulufalulu7877

22 күн бұрын

50 years later, with all the advancement in technology and they still can't do it... That's what troubles me.

I was given a mission patch when I was 4 years old in 1969 and couldn't understand how two guys could fly to the moon on an American Bald Eagle.

@craigcorson3036

Жыл бұрын

Three guys. Two landed, while the third stayed in orbit above the moon. Six astronauts had what must have been a VERY eerie experience, being _completely_ cut off from all other humans while they were in orbit on the lunar far side.

@babscabs1987

Жыл бұрын

They used freedom

@whee38

Жыл бұрын

I kinda wish 4-5 year old you could have met the astronauts. the look of confusion and realization as the astronauts as they figured out that the eagle on the patch would be funny

@eljefeamericano4308

Жыл бұрын

They were just THAT American.

@spackle42

Жыл бұрын

still more believable than some of these conspiracy theories.

A lot of people tend to forget that each Apollo mission was broadcast live for hours on end....uninterrupted with no cuts. Not just Apollo 11 either every mission up till 17.

@freeearthcitizen7601

Жыл бұрын

So if its on tv, it must be real. lol

@last-chance_

Жыл бұрын

Hmmm how was it done live given that technology didn't exist in the 70's?????

@scott_meyer

Жыл бұрын

@@last-chance_ What, live TV didn't exist in the 60s and 70s? That's news to me.

@isoldam

Жыл бұрын

@@last-chance_ You think live broadcasts didn't exist in the 70'? Really? In the late 30's and 40's, all TV was live.

@Stash186

Жыл бұрын

Are you sure?

Thank you for this video - it's an important topic. Given how much deceptive, ignorant and otherwise damaging crap there is on the internet, any injection of sanity is to be welcomed. (Sidenote, I once had the pleasure of meeting Buzz Aldrin at a press conference about future manned space vehicles - this was a while ago, back in the 90s. Absolute legend.)

It’s worth noting that James Van Allen was a fierce critic of Apollo and Human Spaceflight in general, yet he dismissed the claim that the VAB’s made it impossible to travel in space. There’s also what writer Jay Whindley terms “selective omnipotence,” namely if Nixon was able to fake six moonlandings and a near disaster then why couldn’t he have covered up a burglary? 🤔

@gives_bad_advice

10 ай бұрын

maybe some form of these selective powers can explain why NASA was do successful with the Saturn V but then produced a lunar lander made from cardboard, duct tape, and wire clothes hangers.

@garethmurtagh2814

10 ай бұрын

@@gives_bad_advice It didn’t 🙄 kzread.info/dash/bejne/p4eDxKx_qse9Yso.html

@mikep9604

10 ай бұрын

@@gives_bad_advice So you don't understand the difference between the actual structural frame of the Lunar Module, and the thermal insulation material which is placed on the top of its structural frame.

@preschoolenglishwithtumtum4283

8 ай бұрын

​@@gives_bad_advice Because NASA couldn't afford to make a decent looking fake. What a stupid comment.

It's so ridiculous and has caused a lot of distress for buzz aldrin despite the fact he should basically have been able to chill on his laurels bc he basically did the most amazing thing anyone ever did

@tymesho

Жыл бұрын

Buzz puts more stress on himself then all the debunkers put together. Don't get me wrong, I love the cat, but c'mon.

@QBCPerdition

Жыл бұрын

Well, to be fair, he did the second most amazing thing anyone ever did ;-)

@zoeyshoots

Жыл бұрын

He also told a 10 year old, on camera, we never went there.. who knows??? Van Allen belts still puzzle me

@paulford9120

Жыл бұрын

@@zoeyshoots Bull

@Banks4004

Жыл бұрын

annoying buzz aldrin may be the only good thing that came out of these conspiracies

I had heard that Stanley Kubrick was hired to fake the moon landings. But he insisted on such realism that they ended up having to go to the moon to shoot the footage anyway 😀

@cynsalm2288

Жыл бұрын

😂🤣😆😁

@paulkeenan2691

Жыл бұрын

And he killed himself at such frustration that they would not believe his movie in how he faked landings.

@Lowonfuel

Жыл бұрын

@@paulkeenan2691 If by any remote chance Stanley Kubrick was indeed hired by NASA (though his daughter categorically denies it) it was probably to create the out of ship graphics, those we see of a space probe where nothing could film them, those views from distances as short as a few feet from the probe to as far as it could be seen and identified... and they show us such videos because it's what we like most, to watch air or spacecraft flying in their environment, but since there isn't any way they could make a camera fly along and film the craft, they have to draw the view instead. That may someday be possible when they develop inexpensive space drones that can fly along and film shots that replace what till now is done by computer. From what I've read, Stanley Kubrick was an honorable man, and he would have never got involved in such a farse. You probably won't understand this because it takes an honorable mentality to understand another and most conspiranoids are no such thing... if anything they are very dishonest but don't see themselves that way, and think it so easy for others to be like them, but they are very wrong!!!.

@timpatrickhanna

Жыл бұрын

@@Lowonfuel You need to learn to recognize sarcasm.

@Lowonfuel

Жыл бұрын

@@timpatrickhanna I responded to Paul Keenan because he wasn't being sarcastic, he truly believes that Stanley Kubrick killed himself... after "being discovered for having faked the Moon Landings", but he died of a heart attack during his sleep in 1999, 29 years after the Movie 2001 Space Odyssey.

Kaysing did for bullsh*t what Stonehenge did for rocks.

It's not the broadcast out for which the soviets would be listening, but the broadcasts back, that their origins were consistent with the spaceflight in progress, and that the quality would be consistent with live broadcasts.

"With a little planning, all of this was overcome. It's Almost as if NASA has a lot of people working there, who Know Exactly what they're doing." You are Awesome Simon

@proto-geek248

Жыл бұрын

I laughed at that also 🤣 Solid point.

@PetrSojnek

Жыл бұрын

Well in a way that's exactly what conspiracy theorists could also say :D E.g. they can fake anything. (I don't believe in the theory, just pointing out a little bit of logic fault)

@paulhogsten2613

Жыл бұрын

Sorry buddy it's NASA (Not A Space Agency)! NO ONE ever went to the MOON!

@semaj_5022

Жыл бұрын

​@@paulhogsten2613 and 400,000 people successfully kept it secret for decades. what's the purpose of lying about going to the moon? Especially after making several return trips, putting landers on Mars, telescopes like Hubble and JWST into space, launching probes like Juno or the Parker Solar Probe, etc? What would be the point of lying to begin with, let alone carrying on that lie? Let alone the impossibility of keeping the secret.

@ChristophBrinkmann

Жыл бұрын

@@paulhogsten2613 Gonna need some reliable, verified sources that are backed with peer reviewed citations to back up that claim, buddy. You're claiming thousands of people faked the moon landing so YOU need to prove it. We already have evidence PROVING, yes I said proving and I did mean proving, you wrong.

13:00 - While the F1s performed flawlessly, the inboard J2 Engine of Apollo 13 did fail during launch. The spacecraft was still able to achieve orbit. As related in the movie, "well, I guess we've had our glitch for this flight"

We know it is true because if it wasn’t, Russia would have immediately shown proof that we didn’t beat them to the moon.

@maaruz1979

9 ай бұрын

We know it’s true because we saw it on TV smh

@turtlesandmoreturtles4140

9 ай бұрын

As someone who has studied that period of history, I completely agree. When the USSR seemed to lose the previous contention (Cuban Missile Crisis) with the USA, their leader, Khrushchev, was fired for it. Brezhnev was risking his job by losing the space race although he did manage to keep it. If he had any suspicion it was faked, he would have let the world know to expose the USA. And after investigating, involving many spies in the USA, the Soviets found no evidence that it was faked, and admitted they had lost the space race.

@stevebryce6071

8 ай бұрын

I don’t think they world have felt the need to. Russia had the first man in space, first orbital satellite in space, first man-made object on the moon, first to make soft landings on Venus and Mars and put the first space station into low orbit. But hey, America won the space race! 😂

@williammann9176

8 ай бұрын

@Greeneggsandham123 Here is a bit of history as to why NASA could not and would not have faked the moon landings. Even if it could have been faked. 1968 the space race started to heat up again. The USSR was aiming straight for the moon. Their N1 Rocket, their answer to SaturnV was nearing completion. They had highly modified the Soyuz to be their answer to Apollo’s CSM and they built a lander as their answer to Apollo’s LM and the crews were being trained. In August 1968 it was decided by NASA that if Apollo 7 in October was a success that they would skip a repeat of that flight. Apollo 8 would become a test of the LM in Earth orbit launched on the first crewed SaturnV. The LM was behind schedule. It was decided then to send the next flight, Apollo 8, first crewed flight on a SaturnV to lunar orbit with just the CSM in December 68. Then in September and November The USSR sent Zonds 5 and 6* spacecraft (Soyuz 7K-L1P) on free return flights around the moon. They carried various living animals on the flights to see how they handled the effects of deep space. The U.S. feared the USSR was going to try and beat Apollo 8 to the moon. This brought the space race back to a bit of a fevered pace. To the point that Time magazine in early December had as their cover story, who was going to get there first. The cover showed an astronaut and a cosmonaut in a footrace to the moon. Apollo 8 came and successfully went. But the USSR was still working on their Lunar program. They tried a few more Zond missions that failed and their first test of the N1 rocket failed. But this was not known in the U.S. So Apollos 9 and 10 flew in the first half of 1969. There were still fears that the USSR may try to beat the U.S. Even if the US beat the USSR it was felt that USSR would not be far behind Apollo. It was not until 1972 that the USSR finally threw in the towel on their Lunar missions. They had the spacecrafts and trained cosmonauts. But after 4 launch failures of their N1 rocket, they said enough. The Spacecraft were kept hidden till after the fall of the USSR and now are in museums. Now after saying all that. The US still felt all through Apollo that the USSR would be on the moon soon enough. They flew Lunar Zond missions in 1969 and 70. So if the US had faked Apollo and the USSR showed up, well the fake would be exposed. That would have been worse than Apollo failing to that becoming known. *As the N1 was not ready, these missions were flown on the Proton rocket. But it was only powerful to send the Zond alone on a free return mission.

@turtlesandmoreturtles4140

8 ай бұрын

@@stevebryce6071 nothing wrong for them to show them as frauds to the world. Any opportunity would have been taken

Tell Buzz he didn't land on the moon... the stars you see next aren't celestial

@Tim22222

4 ай бұрын

What shape is the earth?

@stephenh5944

3 ай бұрын

@@Tim22222 - He's referring to Aldrin punching Bart Sibrel.

my favourite bit of Lunar Trivia is that Command Module Pilot Michael Collins told Neil Armstrong "If you had any balls at all, you'd go out there and say 'We've touched down on the moon, and - OH MY GOD WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT-" then cut your mic." making him the funniest man to ever walk on the moon.

@matthewdopler8997

Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately that is just a myth.

@DanielGarcia-ir8oe

Жыл бұрын

That would have been GOLD.

@Fireguy97

Жыл бұрын

That would have been the best dad joke ever!

@suavexxi

Жыл бұрын

I hope they joked around like this- at least the thoughts shared for laughs. Astro-Types can be sadly uncomical

@willpemberton6823

Жыл бұрын

@@suavexxi not nearly as much miserable tossers who push conspiracy nonsense, they really have no sense of humour, or any sense at all.

The wildest claim Kaysing made has to be that the most famous people in the country went to Las Vegas and caused a big scene, and no one recognized them.

@brothergrimm9656

Жыл бұрын

Precisely... at that time they were like rockstars in that everyone in the country knew their faces.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

You say, that is in his book? Not sure they were before their return.

@paulinegallagher7821

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna yes they were. The featured in life magazine and their every move followed for months before the launch. None of them were comfortable with the attention

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

@@paulinegallagher7821 ?????????????? Oho too much to drink? :) Who said they were comfortable with so much attention? ...WHO followed everymove on the NASA base? Hello? Featured... doing the Greatest Leap of Mankind, think so, NASA is a Civil Agency not a spy one! They all trained much with cameras and expected to be unseen🤔 Wives werent, or Mother(suicide), but these tuff Military Officers were used to uncomfortness. After a Month of Tourring Neil also volonteered to tour with Bob Hope in Vietnam, and numerous interviews after.

@susanread1246

Жыл бұрын

Also they were constantly in radio contact when not with NASA , with Parks in NSW Australia.

The Soviets didn’t question the validity, if anyone wanted to discredit the USA claims that they landed on the moon then it was in their best interests!

I always love when they come up with these elaborate schemes as to how things were faked... when it would have been much easier to just do the thing they were allegedly faking.

“Almost as if NASA has a lot of people working there who know exactly what they’re doing” I love smug sarcasm 😂

@daveeol1987

Жыл бұрын

I find it sad and pathetic

@ghz24

Жыл бұрын

@@daveeol1987 Is that because it's directed at some unfounded beliefs you wish were true?

@ValMartinIreland

Жыл бұрын

It was a need to know basis only.

@ghz24

Жыл бұрын

@@ValMartinIreland Nothing about apollo was "need to kniw" tgey told everyone exactly how they were going to do it. They had TV specials that showed how it worked and included interviews with the engineers that designed it giving guided tours of the equipment it's components and layout. The Glomar Explorer was need to know and nobody cared about it at all but still it was busted after only a year.

@clarkkent4665

Жыл бұрын

It's funny how no other nation has been able to reach there even after decades

As to the F-1 first stage engine there was a failure that occurred during the ascent phase of Apollo 13. The central engine of the 1st stage failed during the later part of the ascent to orbit . This is featured in the movie "Apollo 13". NASA's response was to simply let the remaining 4 engines operate long enough to achieve the necessary altitude to fire the second stage. They had already planned for this. Actually, over the entire Apollo program the powerful F-1 engine was very reliable. Ironically, during the Apollo 13 ascent phase when the F-1's central engine quit firing Lovell said "well, I guess we've had our glitch for this mission".

Stanley Kubrick was such a stickler, that he agreed to fake the landing on one condition: It had to be filmed on location.

@yerma6847

Жыл бұрын

Thats the big issue with Stanley kubrick they simply forget that he was so finicky with locations and his movies that the only real way he filmed that is if he was launched up there himself

@dionh70

Жыл бұрын

@@spfreddec1975 You've completely missed the point, but that's OK. Here, have some pudding and go back to watching The Three Stooges.

@Mark-oi9rf

Жыл бұрын

Full Metal Jacket - a Stanley Kubrick film set in Vietnam, was filmed in London…

@alexcrouse

Жыл бұрын

@@Mark-oi9rf whoosh. It's a joke, Mark.

@alexcrouse

Жыл бұрын

@@spfreddec1975 says you.

Casing didn't have any theories. Just lies.

Of course they went, the fact Buzz smacked him, proves how angry he was being called a coward! The man, was brave, beyond brave, he walked on the Moon!

@marksprague1280

8 ай бұрын

Actually, Aldrin punched an unstable convicted criminal who lured him there under the guise of an interview by a legitimate organization, prevented him from leaving, and became increasingly aggressive. It was self defense.

Here's a short explanation - it was easier to *actually* send 3 astronauts to the Moon than to fake it, because faking it would have required *literal magic* , while actually doing it merely required thrust, money, and balls - three things America could find in sufficient quantities. Someone else below remarked on the fact that any transmissions purporting to come from the spacecraft throughout the mission phases would have *actually* had to come from a spacecraft flying the published mission orbits (including the landing sites on the Moon). That's because you could easily track the spacecraft with directional antennas (the best way to get intelligible reception, and thus the normal way every nation and scientific organization did track the spacecraft). This gives you automatic Radio Direction Finding on the spacecraft. So the transmissions *had* to come from the spacecraft, and it *had* to be where it was supposed to be if flying to the Moon and back, or the RDF bearings would have instantly given away the hoax to every foreign nation (including the Soviets). The time delay issues from speed of light means that there wasn't time to relay the signals through Houston (or even Earth orbit) and have a real person who wasn't actually on the Apollo spacecraft heading to the Moon to reply. Given multiple examples of transmissions that involved responding to transmissions or incidents that were literally *unscriptable* because they could not have known they were coming up, NASA couldn't just play a pre recorded tape from.an unmanned spacecraft they were pretending to talk to. An AI capable of handling natural human speech (including responding to those unscriptable events) is *barely* possible (although often goes off the rails quickly) *today* , and even if NASA somehow figured out the correct algorithms 40+ years before anyone else in the world did and somehow managed to hide that code from the rest of the world until this century, the *hardware* required would have been significantly larger (and *far* heavier) that the total weight of what NASA claimed to be sending to the Moon and back. So, just on the radio transmissions alone, conspiracy myth busted. Literally *impossible* to fake it with 1969 technology, and even if they somehow managed to pull that off, it would have been easier to stick astronauts on board with all the radiation shielding and everything else the conspiracy theorists insist they would have needed - it still would have been smaller, lighter, and cheaper to send to the Moon and back compared to what they *would* have had to use if they da Vinci'ed up a super computer that had a better better speech AI than what we can produce today. Then there is the film evidence. Because they mostly only see the short segments of film, most people don't realize how long the uncut footage (both in the capsule and the external cameras on the Moon) is. This creates a problem if one is trying to simulate zero G or even lunar ⅙ G. There are only two ways to reduce gravity to microgravity - either actually fly in space, or fly the Vomit Comit route. Can't film longer than 25 seconds or so doing the Vomit Comet route and you can't have a sound stage larger than the cargo bay of the aircraft. For reducing felt gravity to ⅙ gravity to simulate the Moon, one must either go to a place (like the Moon) with ⅙ gravity, or one must go to someplace with lower gravity than that (like the microgravity of Earth orbit) and then spin the *entire sound stage* to get back up to ⅙ gravity. Again, harder than just going to the Moon, and the Russians darned sure would have noticed if we put a space station the size of a good sized warship into orbit (and people on Earth would have been able to see it with the *naked eye* as it passed overhead). This also wouldn't have addressed the radio issues above. "But what about just using slo-mo film to make it *look* like things like dust are falling at ⅙ G, while using wire FX to simulate the hugh jumps? Film with the camera at 6x normal speed and them play back at the normal rate! And we could hid a ground based vacuum sound stage, so the dust doesn't billow!" Problem - that would have had to be a film reel more than a dozen feet across and weighting tons, and the motor.would have to be capable of constantly adjusting the rotation speeds of both reels (to ensure a steady frame rate) without breaking the relatively weak film or burning the motors. Literally could not build camera equipment capable of doing that. And *any* glitch in any frame would require refilming the entire take from beginning to end (we have the original full length films - there are no missing frames where a splice could have been inserted). The electronically scanned TV images would be worse as the magnetic tape would be even more fragile and susceptible to damage. So, literally impossible, even if you get around the "how do we fake interactive, real time, but delayed by speed of light, radio and TV transmissions in flight and on the surface of the Moon?" Problem. This is merely two areas where I have direct knowledge of the *impossibility* of faking the Apollo missions. I am sure there are other fields of knowledge with similar issues.

@michaelfried3123

Жыл бұрын

well said sir! well said...3 things your typical Brit has a serious lack of most days...

@Zundfolge

Жыл бұрын

The best response I've heard to all this is that yes, they hired Stanley Kubrick to fake the moon landing, but he was such a perfectionist he insisted on filming it on location.

@barriewright6727

Жыл бұрын

Most conspiracy theories gave people the thoughts from the film capricorn 1.

@eliahabib5111

Жыл бұрын

It is possible to play a pre-recorded message from the "fake" spaceship actually going to the moon, but it would have probably have worked as well as singing in playback. You can do it if you prepare it a lot. Which means that the people on earth need to be on the conspiracy. And as someone wrote a mantain8ng a secret difficulty is proportional to the square of the numer of people that know it. The delay argument makes no sense. In non emergency situation people tend to wait a little bit before responding to be sure that the other side finished his sentence. Also if the answer is given from the next room, send to the "fake" spacescraft and then sent back or if the astronaut are actually on the spacecraft and need to wait for the message to reach them before they could response THE DELAY IS THE SAME. Even from the moon the delay is just a couple of seconds. Even if there is no or less than expected delay it doesn't prove anything. The astronauts might have started answering before they hear the full transmission.

@shademe

Жыл бұрын

Jesus

I followed the whole of the space race with bated breath. Kept a scrap book with newspaper clippings. Built the Gemini and Aoollo models. Listened to the touchdown live, courtesy of my science teacher. Apart from all that, the clincher for me is that if it had been fake, the Soviets would have known, and they would have shouted loud.

@lenman1114

Жыл бұрын

I started 1st grade in 1959. Watched every Mercury, Gemini and Apollo launch. I remember the B + W TVs the teachers would wheel into the classroom. Up on those big stands. I don't ever remember hearing a peep from the Russians about it being faked.

@Ebani

Жыл бұрын

That's a very dumb justification, 'muricans never believed Russia and back then passed everything as propaganda as the brainwashing was still in full, this wouldn' t be any different.

@paulhogsten2613

Жыл бұрын

And if you still believe it, you're still indoctrinated to the nonsensical propaganda!

@RogueWraith909

Жыл бұрын

I would've loved to be around back then! Excited to see what happens with Artemis and Starship flights in the near future!!

@paulhogsten2613

Жыл бұрын

@@RogueWraith909 You will never see Artemis going to the moon (they will keep pushing the launch date back until the day your gone)! Then on that day your soul will travel to the moon where you will eagerly await the little rocket to land (and there you will wait for eternity -because it will never happen in reality, just on earth in a Hollywood Studio)!

They did hire Stanley Kuberick to fake the moon landing, but he was such a perfectionist he insisted they actually film the landing on the moon on location...

Fake it on location.

Find it sad how so many people can ignore so much hard evidence - films, photo's, documents, math, accounts all stacked up higher than one could ever consume. To then simply disregard it all over a single persons word, or the shape of a rock, and/or just a huge misapprehension of physics.

@ArKritz84

Жыл бұрын

It’s magical (instead of critical) thinking, applied liberally with a side of confirmation bias and however much intellectual dishonesty is required to keep the conspiracy afloat.

@jefforta4717

Жыл бұрын

It’s more so a history going back to the beginning of civilization of governments doing the most horrific things imaginable and always lying about it. It’s the person who takes the official narrative at face value that is the fool.

@Hellndegenerates

Жыл бұрын

I've got photos of my Buggati, therfore proof.

@wildboar7473

Жыл бұрын

I find it amazing how IT floats with no ending in sight, as if a deep insecurity or is it just fanatical cultism? Godzilla Believers dont overreact like this, Maths..... that hard stuff doesnt fair well with likelyness of Life out of soup and Evolution.

Reminds me of joke I heard comedian say years ago about his grandmother. 'My grandma believes wrestling is real but the moon landing is fake.' Lol

@jeffduncan9140

Жыл бұрын

Foxworthy

@jeffashley5512

Жыл бұрын

@@jeffduncan9140 I thought it was he but couldn't remember for sure. Sounds like Southernism. Lol I'm from Tennessee so I know them well.

@jeffduncan9140

Жыл бұрын

@@jeffashley5512 it does indeed sound like a Southernism, especially when you pronounce it as rasslin'. 😆 I'm from Georgia myself. So, I know not to be overly critical.

Mhm, yes, who to believe? A giant group of scientists, engineers, pilots, some of the brightest minds of the century or a cab driver? Yes, the cab driver it is 🤦🏻‍♂️

@ml2167

8 ай бұрын

You sound like the sort of person who would have been talked into buying that final ticket on the OceanGate Titan.

@yassassin6425

8 ай бұрын

@@ml2167 Said the gullible fool defending Bart Sibrel.

@CGZ26

8 ай бұрын

@@ml2167 you sound like a cab driver 🤣

@ml2167

8 ай бұрын

@@CGZ26 Enjoy your trip to the Titanic in your cardboard sub!

@CGZ26

8 ай бұрын

@@ml2167 🚖

Lunar orbiter has photo'ed the landing sites, resolving the landers and even trauls of astronaught footprints. The arguments will never stop...

The laser reflector is still there but I suppose that could have been placed by a very precise remote vehicle. But mostly, the fact that our enemies of the time weren't able to discredit it would be the deciding factor.

@dgh25

Жыл бұрын

People shot lasers at the moon before "we went there"... The moons reflective sand already works as a mirror. Go read some books and dont be fooled.

@BeatenTrackUK

Жыл бұрын

Your enemies at the time are the same enemies as the present... they are on the inside. And even if the world worked the way you seem to think it does... had Russia released anything then the media here would have called it lies, fake propaganda, etc... it might have been a talking point for a week but quickly buried. Russia also stuck w the Gulf of Tonkin lies, now officially a lie.... why was Russia/China/Japan/Vietnam not telling us the USA was lying to the world? even now most think Vietnam attacked a US Vessel leading to it... it was lies. If they can lie about a war and those you see as enemies stay silent, dont you think they can do the same for anything else? "Hey Russia... stay quiet... and then you can run your own money laundering operation from taxes w your own space agencies?" Money rules this world... and those that are ruled by it do not care what little act they gotta play as puppets. And I could list many other lies the so called "enemies" of the USA keep quiet about... "It is well enough that the people of this nation do not understand our banking and monetary system... for if they did, there would be a revolution tomorrow morning" - Henry Ford. Could a monetary system that is in essence a scam not be called out by our enemies? umm m not a peep.... isnt that interesting? So many on these comments just assume Russia is an enemy.... if they were an enemy they would educate us on what the above quote means ;) that way we would revolt. So would any enemy... they would tell us about Epstein Island and the world leaders that have gathered there.... but do you hear anything? nope... Behind the curtain, all your "enemies" chill w your leaders... just like the WWE just far more nefarious.

@TheTigero

Жыл бұрын

Laser ranging experiments were conducted almost a decade before the “retroreflector” was even claimed to have been placed on the moon. There’s no proof it exists.

@every1665

Жыл бұрын

Good point. If the Soviets could have possibly spotted a flaw in the event they would have brought a 5 minute ad on the Johnny Carson Show to tell it.

@varmastiko2908

Жыл бұрын

The enemy thing is a sham. Independent nations don't exist. They want you to believe they do so you are easier to control.

I loved that episode of mythbusters as a kid, they busted many of these claims. The footprints, flag, how easy the astronauts moved and shadows

@alicebennett754

Жыл бұрын

I have pointed this out a number of times. They were great shows

@stevestolarczyk8972

Жыл бұрын

Agreed. And my biggest takeaway from that was, if you listen to the other side and honestly consider their viewpoint/evidence, you might actually learn something new and fascinating.

@ydhamitch7971

Жыл бұрын

And yet millions of people still think it's all fake...

@miketype1each

Жыл бұрын

I remember the episode. They could prove absolutely no claim that the landings were hoaxes.

@monty4336

Жыл бұрын

The best part was when Adam couldn't replicate the movement of the astronauts no matter how much manipulation was applied. If they couldn't do it with more modern camera technology how could they fake it that well in 1969? Also, the Soviets would've pounced on any evidence that is was a sham and exposed NASA as a fraud.

A more likely conspiracy is that humans have been back to the moon more times than the general public knows.

Absolutely fantastic explanation. Such a shame that so many people would believe the ridiculous conspiracy theory over the actual astonishing achievement of the Apollo program.

@Nikki-cm2dp

10 ай бұрын

Its not crazy to question the government. Its crazy to believe everything the governement shoves down your throat.

@chrislox1

10 ай бұрын

@@Nikki-cm2dp Another one!

Another bit everyone misses about the footage of the Apollo landings: back in the day, whenever they started transmitting, the major networks would just start carrying it, sometimes over an hour at a stretch, and we'd sit there watching it, two guys in spacesuits bounding about on the lunar surface. It might have been theoretically possible to fake some shorts with late 60's - early 70's technology, there's no way they could've done it for an hour or more, without any edits, film scratches, etc., which would've given up the whole gig. The nutjobs today only deal with the snippets, not the big long stretches of really not a lot happening. Why fake that in the first place?

@charlessudick8519

Жыл бұрын

@James Henry Smith radio and microwaves are also bounsed of the " Firmament " not just across the plane ....

@andersandersen6295

Жыл бұрын

If they could bounce around on the moon for a hour without editing, why would it be impossible on earth?

@wyrmofvt

Жыл бұрын

@@andersandersen6295 Because the astronauts movements had to be right, else the USSR would immediately call bullshit. Replicating lunar physics on earth would require lots of special effects and as such must be prepared ahead of time, and it all had to be just right, not only in and of itself, but the live performance had to be timed right. On the moon, the astronauts just had to do their thing.

@andersandersen6295

Жыл бұрын

@@wyrmofvt Not taking into account that the russians were in on the hoax.

@wyrmofvt

Жыл бұрын

@@andersandersen6295 And why would they be in on the hoax?

"Im not gonna believe nasa because I don't think there's enough hard evidence" ... "Anyway I'm gonna believe this one guy who has no hard evidence whatsoever"

@christopherdeans2732

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely

I really love how people refuse to believe we landed on the moon. They always site the fact that the CPU used was pretty pathetic and weak, but at the same time, we know how the moon acts in orbit. We've observed it for millenia. It just takes a lot of planning and math to navigate to the moon but it's very doable, as shown from the Apollo missions

The Soviets monitored the radio transmissions from the Apollo crafts, which could be easily trinagulatet to prove that they really came from space, and never doubted the moon landing until decades later (by then being Russia). As for Kubrick, he was a very individualist and often subversive artist. The government would never have trusted him to keep a secret like this.

Two awesome things Buzz Aldrin did: 1. Landing on the moon. 2. Punching Bart Sibrel.

@hardryv3719

Жыл бұрын

Landed on the moon, and landed a fateful blow on a buffoon.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

I thought he was the FIRST to pee on the Moon. And to make a Christian Ceremony for his Church!

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

Жыл бұрын

@@hardryv3719 Hi H D, hope that you are well. Is that sibrel the known conspiracy theorist , convicted criminal, stalker of NASA astronauts, spreader of misinformation who lured Buzz Aldrin to a hotel under false pretences and in front of witnesses confronted Aldrin aggressively, refused to leave, followed Aldrin while hurling abuse at him and according to eye-witnesses forced the 72 year old Aldrin up against a wall and refused to let him leave? Yes Aldrin did well. Take care.

@giantgeoff

Жыл бұрын

And 3 lived down the street from me on Park Street in Montclair NJ

@ln5427

Жыл бұрын

3. Remarrying on his 93rd birthday to a walking piece of plastic lol

As I was born on the day Armstrong stepped onto the moon, I've always quipped: "That's one small step for man....but one giant push from my Mum!!" 🤣👍

@vivek27789

Жыл бұрын

😳

@pommiebears

Жыл бұрын

You’re British. Hello fellow Brit. 🇬🇧🌹

@salamanca1954

Жыл бұрын

Good on ya, Mate!

@MemoirsofaBasketcase

Жыл бұрын

Did you ruin her?

@tim7052

Жыл бұрын

@@MemoirsofaBasketcase I take it you're speaking for yourself - and from experience!

" oh so there's radiation. I'm sure that was difficult to get through" " Actually no it was quite easy. Barely an inconvenience"

@sH-ed5yf

11 күн бұрын

Well it was not. Two astronauts died of cancer shortly after their return.

@someguy4131

11 күн бұрын

@@sH-ed5yf I was making a humorous reference to the "pitch meeting" KZread videos 👀 it's a famous quote that he always says. " Actually no barely an inconvenience" In fact, I am quite sure that if you were to just google the words " barely an inconvenience" stuff on the guy's channel will be right at the top of the list 🍻

@Tim22222

11 күн бұрын

@@sH-ed5yf Which ones? You are flat wrong!

@sH-ed5yf

11 күн бұрын

@@Tim22222 Illiterate but so confident at the same time. The classical flat earther Jack swaggert was one of them died 10 years after his Mission. He was 51.

@randyschissler5791

11 күн бұрын

@@sH-ed5yf It was Jack Swigert, not Swaggert, and 10 years after, is not "shortly after their return."

We couldn't do that long of slow motion shot either. Back then, we could do a few seconds. They couldn't do as long of a shot as we did on Apollo 11.

The dust is a really interesting tidbit that I’d never heard of before. In addition, the amount of inventions that were discovered and developed as a result of the Apollo missions just adds more credibility to the efforts put in by countless Americans to make this possible. The next time you need to use an emergency blanket, you can thank the Apollo program for keeping you warm

@tymesho

Жыл бұрын

And Velcro! Can't forget THAT amazing invention, and it only cost taxpayers 92 million!

@brentgranger7856

Жыл бұрын

If you want more of an explanation of the dust from the lunar rover, then check out Vintage Space’s channel and video on the subject. I wouldn’t be surprised if her work contributed to this video.

@MrT------5743

Жыл бұрын

@@brentgranger7856 I have commented and linked Vintage Space's video numerous times in comments on this channels other posts. I am sure they have seen it and are aware of it. Proof is in the dust.

@deerejohn7209

Жыл бұрын

@@tymesho : Sorry, that Velcro thing is a myth. Way older than NASA.

@daveseddon5227

Жыл бұрын

@@tymesho Velcro was patented in 1955 - NASA wasn't born until 1958

I used to work in a candy factory and the molds used for juju, gummies, and jellybean centers are trays of starch that is stamped with a negative mold. The way the starch holds the shape is what makes this possible. Furthermore, when you step in a pile of starch it leaves a better impression than moist soil and it's very dry so I've never doubted the authenticity of the foot prints

@sinymvoinom

Жыл бұрын

So they used starch on the set?

@scottrobinson529

Жыл бұрын

@@sinymvoinom no it shows the possibility of making foot prints with no moisture

@SirenaSpades

Жыл бұрын

Just for sake of argument, starch isn't the same as other materials. Diatomaceous earth is also very, very dry, but doesn't behave the same as starch, which is a slippery feel.

@UkDave3856

Жыл бұрын

@expattaffy1 why don’t you just tell us, it’s easier and quicker

@danielflanard8274

Жыл бұрын

@expattaffy1 I bet that you posted this comment immediately after the photo appeared on screen. I've seen how long conspiracy theory videos are, you should have capacity to stay seated until the section that addresses those "errors".

That proof is the mirror that astronauts left behind on the moon that we use to measure the distance between Earth and the Moon with the laser

@ArKritz84

10 ай бұрын

Not conclusively, since the reflectors could have been deployed robotically. The Soviets did so on the Lunokhod 1 and 2 rovers on Luna 17 and 21 respectively. Their placement was less accurate than that of the reflectors from Apollo 11, 14 and 15, but still usable.

Absolutely loved this video, brilliantly done, I’m so sick of telling people that the Russians would never have missed a chance to embarrass the USA , but I’ve long since learned that if they want to believe in their madness.., I now let them., I think they believe they are sticking it to the “ man”, wile I believe that the endeavour is testament to the skill and work of Human kind and I am proud to say I watched as a child in wonder and still amazed at what we can achieve for good when we want to . Great show guys

It's me again; the dad with the 11 year old son who loves outer space. My son was debunking the conspiracy theory along with you. He's 11 and he gets it. He asked me, "dad, are people really that stupid?" I said, "yes, yes they are." Also, he really liked that someone got punched in the face by an 'old man'.

@kindlin

Жыл бұрын

Think of it more like indoctrination. It's easier to understand that way, the intro and the continued acceptance; it's almost like Stockholm syndrome, where once they're part of it, believing they're right is easier than admitting they were wrong. We have a large portion of the modern population in needs of some real psychological help.

@proto-geek248

Жыл бұрын

And by all accounts it was solid contact. The actual footage brings me to tears. The mixture of pride & hilarity is overwhelming.

@silverhawkroman

Жыл бұрын

@@kindlin reminds me of my illuminati 9/11 loose change days... i mean there may be something going on there but it def aint people dancing naked around a fire lol

@davetaylor2088

Жыл бұрын

I watched that footage - it was a good punch, I wouldn't like to have been on the business end of it.

@Chris-hx3om

Жыл бұрын

Buzz Aldrin, my hero....

I remember watching that confrontation between Bart and Buzz. That was hilarious especially when Bart was punched. Old Buzz can still punch.

@garrettchristopher3462

Жыл бұрын

I'm sure buzz could still whip the average man

@MrMarco855

Жыл бұрын

Almost as good as he can lie.

@notthisguyagain4635

Жыл бұрын

@@MrMarco855 I’m assuming you think the earth is flat as well

@zvast

8 ай бұрын

@@notthisguyagain4635 And also hollow, like his brain.

@onnowesterman6286

8 ай бұрын

@@MrMarco855 Well you are an accuser of an astronaut who went to the moon of lying, says a lot of yourself not about Buzz he did not told a lie ever about moon missions.

Dude made a really good movie, numerous good movies. Terminator movies- judgement day has come and gone. Kung Foo Panda- there’s no ninja Panda. This is an argument between fiction and reality.

There are photos taken by lunar orbiters from foreign countries that show the landers on the moon's surface.

You overlooked another fact, in Parkes NSW Australia, there is a dish that was used to track and relay the moon landing's signal. Whether or not the movie "the dish" was correct in that the signal was lost following a power surge and they had to relocate the Apollo 11 craft by following their planned trajectory backwards from the moon, the dish in Parkes nevertheless served a vital role in transmitting the Apollo 11's broadcast received from space all across the globe.

@Unsensitive

Жыл бұрын

Clearly the conspiracy is multi governmental, controlled by the 🦎 overlords. 🤣

@johnmurphy9636

3 күн бұрын

I think Honeysuckle creek station got the first TV. But yeah it was us in the southern hemisphere that got the EVA.

Another crazy simple thing that blows appart the multiple light sources claim. Multiple light sources cast multiple shadows, switch on two table lamps in a dark room and you'll see two shadows cast on the ceiling light.

@eekee6034

Жыл бұрын

Good point! I don't even see the shadows as strange at all because I grew up with walking in the woods on sunny days. Uneven ground + sunlight = the same kind of shadow distortion.

Thank you, I’m 70 year old, i saw it I believe it, sure i wondered was i wrong , the older i get the more i know I’m right, after a lifetime there’s nobody i know who thinks it happened, I’ve stopped looking for the little things, the big things prove it happened

Haven’t seen anyone mention it yet but the simplest proof that they landed is the presence of 3 optical reflectors placed by 3 of the missions to the moon. All you need is a strong enough laser to be able to see them reflecting light right back to you with a very short delay, about 2.6 seconds. You may in fact see more return reflections because an additional 3 being left by unmanned vehicles.

@Schmidtelpunkt

6 күн бұрын

You need a strong laser and a big ass telescope and then you detect a few photons, but they are far from visible. While this is a clear indicator that retroreflectors have been left on the surface, it isn't really something one can test in one's own backyard.

Flat earthers space deniers and moon landing deniers all do the exact same thing. They ask for pictures, you show them pictures. They say they’re fake, then ask again for pictures.

@dansv1

Жыл бұрын

Yes, like photos of the earth from the moon, or video of the ISS being built.

@Fleato

Жыл бұрын

@@dansv1 yup, can show them anything and they'll just say it's fake, hell you can show them math and they'll just say "yeah what ever that doesn't work." or completely ignore it and say some other stupid claim.

@billybobjones4317

Жыл бұрын

Just for your information, there is no film or original images from the Moon landings, they were all some how destroyed so, the show an image is a false excuse, also Flat Earthers can't be thrown in with the Moon landings as there is a huge difference, one we still can't do today, the Earth we can see from LEO which is a pretty normal thing, we just can't get humans or animals past LEO, the only creatures that made it past LEO and back were two Tortoise, this is a fact you can Google it, the Tortoise have a very high radiation tolerance. Nice way to make your point of view very easy though ;) don't be so lazy next time and do a little research at least.

@leifburke5905

Жыл бұрын

Round earthers all repeat what NASA has told them. Not one of them has been to the moon, proved curvature, or left earths orbit. They believe whatever NASA tells them.

@billybobjones4317

Жыл бұрын

@@leifburke5905 I have been high enough to see the curvature easily, I have also been in one of the tallest buildings in the world and seen the SUnset three times in the same afternoon, plenty of experiments that easily show a curved or round Earth, you can do it yourself, just go to a very tall building with a fast lift, watch the Sunset from ground floor then ride the elevator up to the top floor and Bingo, the Sun is ther ein all it's beauty to see and watch go below the horizon again, explain that on a flat earth lol.

As someone who has watched your channel for years, progress from thousands to millions of subscribers, knowing 75% of every story you tell....... I always love to watch your content because i always learn a few more tidbits of info about the subject that i didnt know. You may not hear it enough but we love you and what you do, keep doing it!

@tamaitchison6274

Жыл бұрын

E

@davepowell7168

Жыл бұрын

Wierd

@mulder2400

Жыл бұрын

Regarding Spheres in Space 🌍and Comets: The on screen CGI showing spherical ball🌝🌍⚽objects floating in "Space" is pure nonsense. Our Sun and Moon are local ionizing gas plasma luminaries, travelling within the Tropics. Earth is a fixed level Plane of existence made of fossilized, mineralized biology of mainly ancient Titanic Dragons🐉 some thousands of miles long, turned to stone (Limestone, and Granite) 🗻mountains. The term is nucleophilic substitution, flesh to stone. The 38 Transition Metals we use today literally came from these titans veins, and arteries. The mega titanic fish 🐟🐠🐡give us most of the (SiO2) Silicon Dioxide, and (Si) Silica Dessert sands, exactly like the Sahara titan fish desert ! You still here ? 💫 lol. Space "rocks" ie. Asteroids, Meteors (meat🥩) and of course Comets, are the tough fossil remains of these titans (mostly dragons🐉🐲). The Void of space and level Earth was called the "Raqia" in ancient Hebrew (Latin-Firmament), and "the Expanse" is so massive we get Hyperbolic, and Interstellar (now) Comets. Due to Magnetic Force, when these massive transition metal (conductive) laden space fossils get near Earth's dipole, the Anode is discharging electrons into the "Comet" nucleus and taking protons from it. The Comet is now a hot cathode from a cold state (far away) and Sublimation-Phase Transition (from solid to a gaseous state) is causing it to discharge Carbonaceous Dust and microbes etc. by the hundreds of Tons an hour (example) as a Type2 Comet science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/19apr_isonids above Earth. The 3600 yrs. ago Thera Eruption marked last cycle of energetic Comets, and it was called the "Shar" in ancient Sumerian, the "Completion of the Circuit". The electrical Shar is likely an intentionally induced 👽Cosmic Cycle, which adds raw material (Proton Density, Radial Velocity etc.) to the outer magnetic field of the Toroidal Vortex EMF above the level Earth. The "Solar Wind" is the measured strength of the EMF Torus (AKA magneto/heliopause) without it the harmful ionizing UVC radiation from the Void would make life on Earth impossible. The last Passover 3600 years ago (Minoan eruption) was obviously much, much worse. I figured this out, at far less than NASA $26 Billion a Year budget. 😎 I want a raise, dammit. lol 💲

@mikesecondname

Жыл бұрын

Don’t encourage the fact boy. He’ll make another channel!

@TGo-n-Roscoe

Жыл бұрын

All of this.

It wasn't Ed While, it was Ed White. Ed White was the first man to 'walk' in space as part of the Gemini program. He also held the fixed wing high altitude flight record in I think the X15 util that was eclipsed by the Shuttle. Virgil 'Gus' Grissom was the second American in space who almost died when the hatch blew prematurely and the capsule sank to the bottom of the Pacific.

@Maisygirl1974

10 ай бұрын

Alexei Leonov was the first human being to perform a space walk. Ed White was the first American to perform a space walk.

@emilegeorge6225

9 ай бұрын

Ed White never flew the X-15. The altitude record you are talking about was held by Joseph P. Walker who did bring an X-15 an altitude of 107.96 km. This was the highest crewed flight by a spaceplane to that time, and remained the record until the 1981 flight of Space Shuttle Columbia.

My father worked on the optics for the LLR. His brother was sitting next to von Braun when he gave the "go" for Apollo 11.

@papalegba6796

10 ай бұрын

Never happened 😂

Claiming it was faked is a slap in the face of every Astronaut and Cosmonaut who died prior to landing on the moon and since. Frankly, it is a slap in the face of every Astronaut, Cosmonaut, scientist, mission controllers, etc. who had succeeded too.

@simonruszczak5563

Жыл бұрын

Virgil "Gus" Grissom, Edward H. White, and Roger B. Chaffee, who were toasted to hide the truth would have not agreed.

@freeearthcitizen7601

Жыл бұрын

This illustrates exactly why the hoax was successful - people become emotionally invested in believing.

@landibear6509

Жыл бұрын

@@freeearthcitizen7601 No, I just believe in the science part of it all. Why do we as people always think ourselves as being inferior when it comes to believing that we were/are capable of achieving such greatness? I simply choose to believe we are smarter than we give ourselves credit for.

@gunternetzer9621

Жыл бұрын

@@simonruszczak5563 Total myth.

What made Sibrel think that a man from his era, war fighter pilot vet, and the fact that he had the cojones to be strapped to a rocket was going to sit still as he was called a coward and liar? I just looked up the vid and its satisfying to watch.

@phildavenport4150

Жыл бұрын

What a pity that Buzz wasn't 30 years younger. He could have done a proper job on that brainless prick.

@Kopie0830

Жыл бұрын

He didn't swear to the Bible though. Thus suspicious.

@phildavenport4150

Жыл бұрын

@@Kopie0830 Why should he be bullied into complying with the demands of a braindead moron confronting him in public? And what if Buzz is not religious? Can your tiny mind manage any of that?

@phildavenport4150

Жыл бұрын

@@Kopie0830 Ooooh, I'm destroyed!

@Kopie0830

Жыл бұрын

@@phildavenport4150 I've deleted my childish post about you having a you know what. Let's be civilized here and not call names. I'm just pointing out my point of view. If your going to react to someone's point of view, might I suggest not being personal and being objective instead and acting like a child and calling names? If he's not religious, he could have at least given a reason like, "sorry, classified, I'll get in trouble if I say anything." That would have been his appropriate response. Well, he can be silent about it but people would look at it suspiciously. Like I do. Anyway, I'm out of here.

The moon landing shadows make sense. What people say is evidence of two light sources can be explained by the lens focal length and ratio between distortion:compression. But if Stanley really directed this he would know there was one light source and he would also know how to properly light the scene with one light.

We cannot make a self driving car yet, we could not have landed on the moon.

@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth

8 күн бұрын

A "self driving car" was not a perquisite for a manned lunar landing. Take care.

@ArKritz84

7 күн бұрын

Aah, the old “I cannot make fish fillets, so you can’t repair a mechanical watch”. Do better.

@johnmurphy9636

3 күн бұрын

There are self driving cars and man did land on the moon in 1969. You sir........

This is wonderful! And it reminds me of that NBA player who said the Earth was flat.. and then when corrected, everyone in the group said that the round earthers had got to him😂 so I guess the moon landers got to you?😂

Wait, not seeing stars in space is a conspiracy? You would be able to, if you aren't in a position where the very close to us star, which we affectionally call the sun isn't drowning out everything. Its why we see stars at night, and not at lunch time.

@konigstephan

Жыл бұрын

To put it in very simple words, you won't see stars at lunch time because of the Earth's atmosphere. No atmosphere, lots of stars, simple - wherever you're standing.

@aleisterlavey9716

Жыл бұрын

@@konigstephan maybe the camera film used couldn't film the stars without making the astronaut and the flag looking bright white without details.

@MarCuseus

Жыл бұрын

@@konigstephan Wrong. 🤦‍♂

@Agarwaen

Жыл бұрын

@@konigstephan this is entirely false. I mean, are you fucking seriously suggesting there's no atmosphere on earth at night? are you really this insane?

@trevorpom

Жыл бұрын

@@konigstephan If I shine a torch in your eyes what do you see apart from a bright light? You mentioned simple...

Every country in the world with competent military-grade radar could have tracked the progress of any translunar object of that size at least as far as the point that it left orbit and began heading to the moon-and none of them ever once disputed any of these flights. If you've gotten that far in the "fake", you might as well finish the job.

A little louder for everyone in the back. You just swatted down rebuttals like gadflies. Fantastically supported and argued