If you want to perpetrate a gargantuan hoax, you do it once, heave a sigh of relief if you think you've succeeded and leave it at that. You don't go repeating it multiple times with ever-increasing chances of being found out. The hoaxers sometimes forget that there were nine moon missions, six of which landed on the lunar surface . . .

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

Okay WE sometimes forget, even if every kid in the block comes out with that original rational, but hey we are not taken seriously and dont love the apollo program. Found out by WHOM & HOW? Not like down here where there are lots of Folks and Clues be found. Nothing changed in those 3 years, so what goes on in SPACE stays in SPACE back then. Not like now 50 years latter everyboyd is driving around up there. Remind WE of the increased risk.

@paulbeardsley4095

3 жыл бұрын

@P. Spit You don’t have the slightest clue what a hoax would actually involve.

@paulbeardsley4095

3 жыл бұрын

@P. Spit As I said, you don’t have the slightest clue.

@paulbeardsley4095

3 жыл бұрын

@P. Spit Your surrender is noted.

@paulbeardsley4095

3 жыл бұрын

@P. Spit People don’t resort to kindergarten insults when they are winning an argument.

funny in 69 they could go to the moon and not fake it in 2018 they can fake it but cant go the moon anymore

@l.rongardner2150

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Makes no sense.

@CrossWindsPat

5 жыл бұрын

We can go there... Nobody wants to PAY for it...

@0x8badf00d

5 жыл бұрын

In 1969, we could go to the fucking moon. In 2018, we need to tell people not to eat tide pods.

@SoburinMuhandae

5 жыл бұрын

hahaha. so true

@user-tt5js4bh2v

5 жыл бұрын

In 1911 Norway beat Britain to the South Pole in their equivalent of the _space race_ . Britain was a bit peeved, but 'tally ho chaps' and all that. As far as I know, this did not in any way prevent Britain and many other countries providing large funding to explorers for the continuing exploitation of Antarctica. To the extent that it's now a bustling hive of secrecy and clandestine military bases. This gigantic _waste of money_ being spent on something with _zero public interest_ must surely all be down to the fact that there are no penguins on the moon.

RIP Collins. Thank you for everything you've given us as an artist, and an intellectual.

@narajuna

7 ай бұрын

He just left? Knew he been in hospital, not sure about the rest, this had been a awful period in his life, none of his Admirers can name one real Conspiracy...

@israeldiegoriveragenius2th164

4 ай бұрын

He was a propaganda idiot

@narajuna

4 ай бұрын

Obviously yet an other who had not read The Demon-Haunted World. "One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've (Sheeple norm) been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.(event con)😎 We're no longer interested in finding out the truth.(self thinking) The bamboozle has captured us. It's simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we've been (Nasa) taken (School programming). Once you give a charlatan (Gov) power over you, you almost never get it back." ― Carl Sagan

@txswm

3 ай бұрын

Oh no. I sent him a thank you for this video years ago, and he was kind enough to send a thank you email back. I've sent this clip to hundreds of people when they question :/ RIP indeed

@narajuna

3 ай бұрын

wonder what folks think when these superior intellectual full of proof videos have many hidden replies?

A true KZread classic. I wanted to find it again after many years

@narajuna

3 жыл бұрын

YT Classic is good? Many say its not a place to get anything good, huge danger of being Brainwashed! But yeah it will last despite the hate. What matters is the gov lies all the time & perpertrating real Conspiracies regularly on Us.

This might be the single best response I've ever heard from the photography perspective, retorting against the 'fake moon landing' story. Very methodical, informative, humbly presented and entertaining. It's refreshing to hear a mellow voice narrating a monologue on KZread rather than full-blast the whole time like a lot of presenters.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

So the proven apollo reality episodes need responses? Humbly?? The Honno Sapien was respectful to Others? Many with more 'knowledge' have debunked him, just like Jarrah White, She has more than just mellow voice.... /_x49lImzw5s /-3zhZqiSe5c /zE6OIPlQ3-8 2:50 😃

@TruthSeeker7101

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/qaV4t9COktXMaJc.html&ab_channel=ApolloDetectives

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Here is more of less talk and more Evidence of the HUGE retorting against the "total nonsense debunked thousands of times" that goes on despite ARTEMIS ! *Apollo 16 - Astronauts on Wires* kzread.info/dash/bejne/iaartJR8ac7NfLw.html used to a few of these displays of glittering lines :) ps: nothing humble about this non-straight sapien, but yes the "man" or evolved Primate of sorts.... did huge research to makeup this entertainment.

@ViralOpinion

Жыл бұрын

Ever research Operation Fishbowl?

@willkettle3959

Жыл бұрын

@@ViralOpinion what's that have to do with the fact it was impossible to fake the moon landing with the film technology available in the 60s?

Remember when the russian's totally called bullshit on this whole thing and went on telling the whole planet that their worst enemy is pranking everyone? Neither did I.

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

You'll upset Felix with this. It's a real thorn in his side. It's fun watching him trying to explain why Russia didn't cry foul.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

@@paulbeardsley4095 It is, you spacecadets do work hard for all that fun. They cheated and USA could prove it, plus get got a least big grain payoff to shutup. Same bankers with same agenda, ennemies as the top 2 political parties are...

@Jan_Strzelecki

4 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 They didn't get the grain payoff, though. They bought it through intermediaries at a normal price, without the USA initially catching up, and _then_ the market reacted and the grain price rose accordingly. This claim is putting the cart before the horse.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

@@Jan_Strzelecki No? My bad! The Great Grain Robbery was the July 1972 purchase of 10 million tons of United States grain (mainly wheat and corn) by the Soviet Union at subsidized prices, which resulted in higher grain prices in the United States. ... In a 10-month span food prices around the world rose 30% in 1973. en.wikipedia.org/en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Great_grain_robbery Great grain robbery - Wikipedia In November 1969, the U.S. Air Force sent Russia an early Christmas gift.??? It was a sleek flying machine that bore an uncanny resemblance to the SR-71 Blackbird spy plane. The American generosity was purely unintentional.??? :)

@Jan_Strzelecki

4 жыл бұрын

@felix mendez _Nowhere near their minuscule minds has the idea crossed that the Russians may have kept silence on the matter for the simple reason that they didn’t give a shit._ Except that they _did_ give a shit, Felix. Even though they didn't officially acknowledge the challenge (which I'm not even sure is factually correct, but it's beside the point) we _know_ that they _did_ plan on going to the Moon themselves. And, again, revealing the fakery would prove the superiority of the Soviet technology to the other Soviet block countries. Do you really imagine that Soviets wouldn't "give a shit" about _that?_ :) _THEY DIDN’T PLAN TO SEND ANY MEN TO THE MOON BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T NEED TO AS THEY COULD DO EVERYTHING ON SITE WITH ONLY UNMANNED MISSIONS_ Except for taking the lunar rock samples, and core samples, etc. :) _AND THEY COULDN’T PROTECT EITHER THEIR COSMONAUTS AGAINST DEADLY RADITION-Funny thing, the same problem NASA has now, FIFTY YEARS LATER_ No, it's an entirely different problem altogether, Felix. The "problem" NASA had and solved *six years* ago was protecting the astronauts from radiation during *long term missions* - like, um, I dunno… *landing on Mars?!* You _do_ know that Mars is much farther from Earth than the Moon is, Felix, right? _Right?_ :D _That is what many (smart) people think also._ Oh, no, not at all, Felix. The whole scientific and professional world accepts the Moon landings as true. _At the time the Soviet regime was having big problems tryng to feed their population and annual deficits in the output of grain, mainly wheat, used to run into several millions of tons._ Wrong year, Felix. The first Moon landing was in 1969, and the grain shortage started happening *two years later* :) _Coincidentally, only a couple of years later_ Note the "later" part here? Your narrative doesn't fit the facts, Felix :) Had the Moon landings been faked, Soviets and China would've denounced them in 1969. Not two years later, not "couple of years" later, but in 1969.

I normally ignore debunks because hoaxers' arguments just don't pass basic burden of proof tests; but here I actually learned something positive about history, and that's well worth it!

@sntslilhlpr6601

2 жыл бұрын

@@narajuna Is that English?

@johnroby6524

2 жыл бұрын

@@sntslilhlpr6601 It's a lousy variation of it.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

Sure lot of inputting by the english, least top dog did more then a line. Leaving aside these english carring youtubers Since when does a ARGUEMENT require burden PROOF TESTS ??? Sounds lame variation of scientific approch. SOMEONE THAT DIDNT IGNORE.... One 1 ONE UNUS wild guy without a job wrote 1 book with no Publisher. A man always denigrated by hateful stalking Preditors as being NOBODY: not a scientists, no qualifications, knows nothing about rockets, many cats. BILL KAYSING Kaysing thus wrote a book titled We Never Went to the Moon: *America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle* *in 1976* *ONE 1 UNOS Year latter.....* *National Aeronautics and Space Administration* (Gov agency) Prints a >>> FACT SHEET [ From time to time we are asked the question above as a result of at least one book and recurring articles in various publications based either on its content or individuals' expressions of their opinions.] FACT >> *- USA GOV* does not make such ISSUES on all non arguements I can not even find such for JFK Assasination rumor plots !

@shortkari

2 жыл бұрын

Video in 1969. With video tape. Not disc. kzread.info/dash/bejne/q5iYtLR-qLqrptY.html

@jackiep1225

2 жыл бұрын

@@narajuna I had a stroke reading this

ive watched this three times, love this man and his deadpan delivery. You think, this is boring...and suddenly you see the twinkle, and start really listening to what he's saying. Especially at the end.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

Judy yes he is not boring, as he is a 11:23, (there is some debate of the rationality of that thing..), One can not know what someone else has as Rationality. The end Twinkle starting at 12:10 ? Too bad he did not make any videos on Real things that matter, just cared for non sapiens blindness like many many smart educated sane people, who dont seem to care for those real Things, as much as many of us blinded Conspiracy Theorists do :)

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

It is so buzy on the section but here in the TOP one very little movement... Regarding us Hoax_ters sources, one I used that was "not credible" /Nasa has been vindicated on one video :) Extraordinary Until Proven Otherwise kzread.info/dash/bejne/haSZtdJ6Y8ibZqQ.html - so now atheist cryers Aliens are not fake :) so some spacetrucking is going on :)

@shawncrossen7580

3 жыл бұрын

This entire claim he makes has been debunked. kzread.info/dash/bejne/kaxom86Cnd3dZdY.html

@narajuna

3 жыл бұрын

@@shawncrossen7580 He is a very debunked man, despite not selling his soul he never took on the real conspiracies, always the badguys that go against their own rational mind that get all the attention and efforts.

@robsku1

2 жыл бұрын

@CRIMNALSNEAK Not to mention that slow-motion video of people acting in earth gravity would look nothing like the actual footage - moon-landing denialists always ignore the fact that if you speed the footage up to what would have been the real speed according to their own claims literally everyone will see how _simply wrong_ it will look like. Sure, they have sped up selected pieces of the footage to make their claims seem legit - but they will never put together and upload a video where all of the footage is sped up, because even they see how ridiculous the end results end being, so they pick the convenient parts and use them. I think it was SciManDan who first demonstrated this part, but you never see the denialists address it, because they can't. And yet they still double down :D

“Make sure everybody in the filming set died mysteriously in a car crash”

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

And yet they didn't.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

@@paulbeardsley4095 That's true many lived, just a few in cars & planes got eliminated, Reagan got the President reward for it!

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 Wernher von Braun worked for NASA, Walt Disney did films for them, and President Eisenhower established NASA in the first place. Where are they all now? Dead.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch Kaysing claimed Irwin was just about to "spill the beans" and reveal the hoax, and suggested that's why he was "killed". Apollo did have military aspects: Project Chapel Bell remains classified to this day, the CIA connection got exposed, all illegal stuff.

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 Kaysing was a nutcase.

Thank you for bringing up The Patriot Act, the biggest piece of anti-American tyranny of this Century. And this Century is still young.

@davedave6650

5 жыл бұрын

Get a skull enema or shut up.

@jamesgoudreau1940

4 жыл бұрын

The Patriot Act sucks but it really has not effected day to day life in the US like say prohibition did. I am not a fan of The Patriot Act but I still feel the need to keep it in historical context.

@leonardphilippgaffke2490

4 жыл бұрын

This statement has nothing to do with patriotism, just with pure logic.

@winring5593

4 жыл бұрын

Luna EB Have you looked into WHY we have never been back? Context is real important...

@zhartheProprietor

4 жыл бұрын

win ring have you looked into why or how they lost or destroyed all evidence of going? Every, single, bit of it. Don’t bother all you’ll find is some tard saying “I’d go back in a nano second”.

A very entertaining intelligent man. Hi take on photography solidified any remanence of doubts. Love the tongue-in-cheek humour delivered tastefully and intelligently. Thanks Collin

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

The smartest looking genius of your liking? Very nice. He take WHAT? Many have doubted the famous genius FILMMAKER, he cried about Jarrah White rebutal. And altered his song, good humour, but dont you love that it all doesnt matter, and poor Conspiracists are blinded to the *real conspiracies* ?

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

More the the intelligent looking "man", without her funny hat ! kzread.info/dash/bejne/oJWNsJqliaqdccY.html 😂

@Conserpov

Жыл бұрын

Meanwhile, a real forensic film expert actually recreated "Moon landings" footage using 1960-s technology and also did full show-and-tell of that. You are so gullible.

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

The Camera Man Explains: How did NASA fake it's images from the Apollo Moon Missions? A master explains... Leonid Konovalov is an associate professor @ the Moscow School of Cinema and the All-Russian State Institute of Cinematography, VGIK, in Moscow. He is an expert in camera operation, cinematography, film projection, film negative developing, among many other related things. In this ongoing series of weekly articles, which he began in 2020, he explains how NASA really achieved it's impressive images from the Apollo Missions (and much more!). He analyzes the “lunar” photos and videos from the cameraman's point of view - how were they filmed? - this is what we no science Conspiracists want, more then lip talk :)

The most important part of his message is the last part when he talks about the unjust laws that we have today that we never questioned coz we are focused on many petty issues that has no bearing in our way of life at all.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

Yes maybe that was the real reason the Philosopher made the video, much ignore conclusion, still we the carring thinking People are affected by forced lies, even many G Followers are affected by it: by Deniers with no faith, calling Gov tales fake :( :( This Genius did a video about it... as MANY with LOTS of videos, and numerous websites= more impact then TV it seems. “For evil to flourish it only requires good men to do nothing” - Simon Wiesenthal

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

"To place a man in a multi-stage rocket and project him into the controlling gravitational field of the moon where the passengers can make scientific observations, perhaps land alive, and then return to earth, all that constitutes a wild dream worthy of Jules Verne. I am bold enough to say that such a man-made voyage will never occur regardless of all future advances." - Lee deForest (1873-1961) (American radio pioneer and inventor of the vacuum tube.) Feb 25, 1957. "Space travel is utter bilge." - Dr. Richard van der Reit Wooley, Astronomer Royal, space advisor to the British government, 1956.

@jrsanti

3 жыл бұрын

Wild Boar science does not operate to convince those who refuse to believe. Science operate to know what is true even if you don’t believe it. That’s the reason we have these technological advancements today while no conspiracy theorists had contributed to any of these advancements.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

@@jrsanti Oops that last dump got you involved, SHE operates does SHE? Well HER followers sure operate against the heretics that refuse faith. See little value is this rant... CTs are supposed to contribute to tech advancements???? That presupposes knowledge of basic science.... What have You contributed? Your prayers? Or pray what has boywonder Hawkings contributed to Technology? ps: SCIENCE does not operated in knowings, it is the search for knowledge, her "truths" are always getting self corrected...

@narajuna

3 жыл бұрын

Wild Boar must have contributed to something because YT deleted his channel. Seems many Scientists operate on TV & YT to con_vince. Sure introduced quickly the Piltdown Man, among other proofs, in Schools to convince operation: "we are just meaningless Privates out of chemical soup...". Nothing to do with Tech advancements, Believers Wright Brothers operated against MS establishment saying we could not fly!

I haven't watched this video in awhile. Every time I watch it, it's better than I remembered.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

well nice someone appriciates taking on hoaxsters such zeal. [ NASA has been confounded by these questions, though not because the agency is unable to answer them. Rather, the old science geeks believe it is beneath their SAT scores to respond at all. As James Oberg, a noted space writer, recalls: ''NASA put out this press release in 2001 that said something like: 'There's a debate about whether we went to the moon. We did.' End of press release. They are hampered by their own conceit.'' The nasa.gov Web site, for example, refuses to debunk hoaxers directly. But not long after Oberg was hired, NASA was embarrassed by press reports of the assignment and panicked at the thought of being seen as surrendering intellectual equivalence to the hoaxers. ''We canceled the program,'' a spokesman, Bob Jacobs, told me. ''There is no book deal. We are not taking on the hoaxers.''] www.nytimes.com/2003/02/09/magazine/lunar-tics.html

@mesonparticle

3 жыл бұрын

It’s awesome! ❤️ It inspired me to make my own video, focusing on different evidence! kzread.info/dash/bejne/Ymelstaeh6W8hMY.html

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

The G joy man is full of it, no wonder he takes a beating here on the TOP & Newest comment section. MoonFaker: Disk Recorders & High Speed Video Cameras kzread.info/dash/bejne/kaxom86Cnd3dZdY.html

@mesonparticle

3 жыл бұрын

Wild Boar lol! Okaaay 😂😘

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

@@mesonparticle Talking about AWESOME, In Death Valley you would see the stars. The best place to see stars is the desert *at night,* in Nevada it is amazing. Did you know that?

"If they haven't lied to you today, maybe they haven't had coffee yet." brilliant

@watchcitydog

4 жыл бұрын

Daniel Griffin, he had his coffee just before he made this video.

@christobanistan8887

4 жыл бұрын

@@watchcitydog Prove it.

@christobanistan8887

4 жыл бұрын

@@watchcitydog Prove "he had his coffee just before he made this video"

@howardbaxter2514

4 жыл бұрын

I haven't had my coffee yet, so I guess that government has lied to me today (side note: it is 5:30pm for me).

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

@@Lamster66 Sounds like a *Conspiracist!* is he Crazy or just doesnt understand GOV working for our good? Mr 66 (like #11 helicopher) deleted all, NASA GOV takes coffee early everyday, some juicy material >>>> "THE APOLLO MOON HOAX: HOW DID THEY DO IT?" COMPLETE VIDEO! kzread.info/dash/bejne/aGx4tNeDotmefNY.html

Thank you, S G- As a fellow professional 61 year old cinematographer/videographer who also worked for 12 years as a union assistant cameraman working with Arriflex and Panavision et alia film cameras back in the 1980s-90s, may I say that you are 100 percent correct! :)

@narajuna

3 жыл бұрын

Soapbox proof? 100%....aint what HE said after dealing with amateur Jarrah White. Anyway happy for you he helped /saved your faith. But really SOMEONE got to deal with the REAL ones other than Hoaxsters.

@JacksonTyler

2 жыл бұрын

@@narajuna consider this: conspiracies are real and happen all the time - and the powers that be are provably laughing all the way to the bank while people like you bark up this tree which ISN’T a hoax. Every minute of effort you spend chasing this dog makes you blind to the ones that actually happened.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

@@lowbrow Government always has specials.... even then as Jarrah White showed there was tricks a Filmmaker could of done to do the impossible.

@jarodstrain8905

10 ай бұрын

​@@narajunajarrah essentially reframes the same tired talking points and appeals to advanced technologies being secretly available to nasa, decades before they actually existed. He makes claims. He doesn't support them. And he doesn't refute anything.

There are over 15 thousand unedited photos from the moon missions online. Look them up and go through them. They are amazing, showing every element of each mission including all the dud photos that were taken. That anyone could fake so many pictures is impossible.

@BrainUser1

2 жыл бұрын

A real impossible, but USA government someone? May be less impossible. Much actually, for a far mission with so much cinematograhy, what other mission has so much coverage?

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

It’s easy to poke holes in any part of the moon landing while seated in an armchair.

@GreatNewsVideo

2 жыл бұрын

LOL Impossible

@IA100KPDT

2 жыл бұрын

15000 from apollo 11?

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

@@IA100KPDT Think not, just 2.5 hours eva walks, but I dont think many or any remain unedited, since CTs picking at them so many have gone Photoshoped. "In 2017, NASA released over 10,000 photos from Apollo -- While NASA has successfully removed from circulation most of the more egregious errors in identical backdrops, as well as errors in continuity and scale -- Nevertheless it is impossible to account for the time necessary to take the number of photographs on record . . 11,000 photographs taken during 4882 minutes total for all EVA's from hatch opening to close again . . This amounts to more than two perfect photographs each minute -- not nearly enough time to account for them -- in addition to all other activities they engaged in. This is not even taking into account all of the outtakes from bad exposure. We give NASA credit for being able to crop and frame the subject matter properly; however, our astronauts had no way to read and adjust the settings for exposure in a camera that had no auto exposure function, yet all 11,000 photographs having perfect exposure, regardless of which direction the sun was or how much lunar surface was in view. This puts the actual number of photos taken at an astronomical number -- while there were far too many for them to have ever taken, even in perfect conditions."

As an IT professional and worked with mainframes before. The Moon Hoaxers said it were (during 1969 - 1972) were CGI, but for the CGI to be possible, you need humongous computer power with TODAY's miniaturized chips. The CPU in your iphone would have occupy several warehouses. The kind of computer did not exist then.

@DeputyNordburg

5 жыл бұрын

It was not CGI, but don't pee all over NASA's commuting power in the day. They did have buildings full of computers.

@nicsandee123

5 жыл бұрын

Nordburg yeah they probably did. Back then one building full of valves wires and huge relays was equivalent to about 1kb, the clock speed was likely around 1 MHz. Not fast enough to keep up with the refresh rate of a cathode ray tube if you are gonna do flicker free animations with relatively large pixels. Sounds like technical doo doo but’s it’s not!

@RawbLV

5 жыл бұрын

@@DeputyNordburg Big computers to crunch numbers, not millions of pixels.

@yellowlynx

5 жыл бұрын

@@DeputyNordburg The CGI claimed by those Moon Hoaxers would not be possible because of the amount of storage, CPU power and memories needed - the buildings would fill up a whole state (if not causing power outage when they were running)

@Cod4Wii

5 жыл бұрын

If they had amazing CGI in 1972, then how do you explain Pong? The video game is just 2 rectangles and tiny square...

I learned, that almost everybody who does not believe in the landing just does not want to believe it for any reason. You can tell them everything - even if it is rediculous what they say, and you have a pure evidence, they do not (want to) believe. I am a film-producer and many things what that guy said, is just what I also told to many people - technically ment. A production like that was also not possible to produce at that time. And by the way, Chinese and Russians also have plenty of pictures from the landing site. There is no doubt, the US astronauts have been on the moon.

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, the determination some of them have to ignore evidence is astonishing. Almost as astonishing as their determination to keep presenting the same old debunked evidence (no blast crater, waving flag, astronauts looked glum etc) as if it trumps the actual evidence. My belief is that conspiracy theoriests are talentless and uneducated people who need to feel superior, so they tell themselves that they know the truth whereas everyone else is a sheep.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

You did??? *How did you learn that?* Please tell all the people how you accomplished that "almost" learning sir??? Well I THINK Most used to believe before becomming Unbelievers! Only during 70's were there 25% USA DO-NOT-WANT-TO people. After that it took YT time to finally convert Believers as myself. So pray Mr Psy what is the percentage of 'Everybody's' who dont believe but that want to....? Or that believe that... *believe* but dont want to? Dear everything-Teller what pure evidence do you have? Why do you even concern yourself with Others beliefs, or Want's? Yes I have seen many FILM guys active at GOV tales defense, strong Believers?

@eventcone

4 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 "Why do you even concern yourself with Others beliefs, or Want's?" Why do you?

@wildboar7473

Жыл бұрын

Because of previous huge demand from myself : I care because Human Consciousness has meaning, now and much latter.... and some beliefs (despite being "insane") are repressed, mocked, censored (as non hypocrites well know). So they need concern for fair chance to study.

@ask-televisionmartingremme9253

Жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 And how do you explain tons of photos, made by Russians and just recently by Chinese, from the landing sites ? I am sure, you have lot of new excuses and claims.("which photos... " ) thats what comes as the answer, I am very sure.

And now they successfully launched and brought back splashdown the Artemis 1 Orion capsule. Looks like the we're going to the moon again.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Okay kind of looklike the show will go on, cannot wait to see them skip hop fall golf and ropejumping & hopscotch? 😊

@olivercharles2930

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna wut

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Nothing to attract Smarts (sane ones) like good old *gibberish* 💥👍 With their classic Science inputs🤓 *successfully launched and brought back* On April 12, 1961, cosmonaut Yury A. Gagarin, onboard the Vostok 1 spacecraft, became the first human in space. The voyage, which began with launch at 9:07 am Moscow time, entailed one orbit around Earth, lasting 1 hour 29 minutes, and ended at 10:55 am in the Soviet Union with his safe return to Earth.

@hankkingsley9183

Жыл бұрын

Everything hoaxers bring up has been widely debunked over and over yet their confirmation bias won't allow them to even consider what is presented in this video. Having your eyes pinned wide open is useless if you've got blinders on!

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

@@hankkingsley9183 Wow how original, sea of knowledge you are! So why do anti hoaxers continue to be so active? Why Articles continue to be birthed? Why so many debunk videos? Why so much hope to be saved by ARTEMIS ?

The sheer number of technical, natural & human factors plus unforeseen internal or external events which could spell disaster or failure of the mission must be astronomical. The odds against every single one of these being perfect enough on one occasion must be terrifying let alone for four or five more of those missions. What an achievement - we really are a special breed .

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

I agree, but which Breed? Dorper, Marino, Suffolk, Harry ? Acknowledged that whilst it may have been theoretically possible, it was highly improbable. NASA mission Director had said least 30 would die trying for that giant Leap. "Threlfall’s was the first official wager in the Space Race, and the odds were not in his favor: Famous bookmakers William Hill allowed him odds of 1,000 to 1 “for any man, woman or child, from any nation on Earth, being on the Moon, or any other planet, star or heavenly body of comparable distance from Earth, before January, 1971.” What lunar bettors didn’t know was that NASA also gave the moon landing long odds. Only months before Threlfall’s wager, a NASA-commissioned risk assessment had forecast the chance of successfully fulfilling Kennedy’s decreed moon landing at just 1 in 20." Even positive Crew after "successful Journeys" >>> ”Armstrong told interviewers on the flight’s 30th anniversary, “but only a 50-50 chance of making a landing on that first attempt.”

@dougdig

8 ай бұрын

It didn't go so well for Apollo 1 when all 3 crew members died in the fire. Also, the famous Apollo 13 was "successful disaster" that almost left the crew stuck in space. There countless stuff that weren't as planned, even the Apollo 11 landing was scary because commander Neil Armstrong didn't land on their target, I mean imagine if they landed on the side of a crater and destroyed their whole lunar module. Also there was lighting strikes and other stuff on the launches, I mean it was a crazy time, all just to beat USSR communism during the Cold War. Thinking about it now, after all they've been through, it's no wonder why they didn't want spend so much money and risk so much lives to land again. Well fast forward more than 50 years later, Artemis 3 is expected to make the first crewed moon landing since 1972.

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

?@@dougdig .......there was no Going or intent to GO with #1, a guinea pig Ground test with HIGH Pressure pure Oxygen (with history of Electric wires not going so well, sparks). After the 'boring' second #12 some Americans complained about TV show cancels.... Famous *13* ...put a little spice danger in the so safe easy SPACE trips (much better % than Planes), so yes a little "almost" excitement was grand! Now image THAT a alien PLANET never walked on with or withOUT a Landing pad >> had a bad Target with ruff Boulders around 😬 Who would of planed on That?? Very very unexpected !! Apollo 10 must of reported a nice Flat even surface -- on that Meteorite blasted crater pocked Moon.? Note: Why was the number 13 so important? The number 13 is considered an unlucky number in some countries.[18] The end of the Mayan calendar's 13th Baktun was superstitiously feared as a harbinger of the apocalyptic 2012 phenomenon.[19] Fear of the number 13 has a specifically recognized phobia, triskaidekaphobia, a word first recorded in 1911.[20] The superstitious sufferers of triskaidekaphobia try to avoid bad luck by keeping away from anything numbered or labelled thirteen. As a result, companies and manufacturers use another way of numbering or labelling to avoid the number, with hotels and tall buildings being conspicuous examples *(thirteenth floor).* [21] It is also considered unlucky to have thirteen guests at a table. Friday the 13th has been considered an unlucky day.[18] wiki

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

It didnt go as JFK planed, 1 first Win, sufficed, not TEN win landings! With some crazy time Solar flares strikes! Nixon was against more as was Congress, and the Majority. But 'THEY' had plans to settle on Moon after Apollo 20 (very small expense), as humans have always done. *2023* with very forward computer simulations (Planes etc) and with much more knowledge, still not sure HUMANs would fair so well....🤢 yet First trip to Moon had Passengers without suffering. 🤫

@KyleSmalltown-uy4fn

8 ай бұрын

The Moon is a Holographic Gossamer.

As a photographer, myself, you were dead on. Something that no one has ever mentioned is that the tracking of the Apollo missions took place in all the first world countries. No one ever seemed to question its validity. Excellent exposé.

@MrLibertyHugger

5 жыл бұрын

Yank ee, Watch the Fox special where the camera maker Hasselblad is being interviewed and is at a loss.

@martijnvandenakker803

5 жыл бұрын

MrLibertyHugger you guys don't stop, do you...? Like roaches...

@johnwoody9505

5 жыл бұрын

@@MrLibertyHugger at a loss as to what?

@thymewarp8651

5 жыл бұрын

@@martijnvandenakker803 reaches like you are believers of a fake NASA moon landing

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

DAH! Everyone tracked, yet the Soviets actually had to rely on our telescopes to track their own lunar probes right up until 1976. The telescopes that the communists were dependent on were the Lovell Telescope and the one at Jodrell Bank. Also, HAM Radio operators could not have tracked the Apollo missions. Neither could the Russians - this is because of the frequency that Apollo transmitted on: 2GHZ. *ASP is an acronym for "Apollo Simulation Project",* which was created in 1961 and operated by the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) to "help" NASA with their technical problems by establishing a totally simulated moon mission.

It’s gets better every time I watch love that ending

@TheGreatAlan75

4 жыл бұрын

That was a real check.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

TOP Comment section sure has the cream of the cream of inputs.

@-quetzalcoatlus-6401

4 жыл бұрын

He know some people will shout "hOw MUcH nASa pAy Y0u", so he make it anyway

@maddman4747

4 жыл бұрын

agreed..

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

Lets All agree on watching the mouse run on the MOON. YES there is Life in Space. NASA Apollo 11 moon landing faked? Coke bottle on set? Not quite. Running behind left to right on kzread.info/dash/bejne/pXerqMuqpMnPmto.html&feature=emb_logo (1/2 speed!)

RIP Collins. Such a talented mind. You will be much-missed by many, my friend 😔 ❤

@narajuna

7 ай бұрын

12.5K subscribers 559 videos and he didnt sell his SOUL like us Unbelievers 😥

10 years later and this is still relevant. Incredible!

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Yes unbelievable!!! "Some people" full of nonsense sure occupy intelligent science people pushing "sense", not so sane.... when it only matters because blinds (Conspiracists) to other real conspiracies.... Yet still many APOLLO Witness fanatics still claim it is impossible to fake today! Incredible!

@entangledmindcells9359

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna Show us the actual technology that was used then

Great ending my check came from nasa . Priceless

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

Is he ashkenazi jewish decent? Amy Shira Teitel with her Vintage space videos rakes in cash, only CT's are not allowed to.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

Sillyness sometimes cost the price of dying young and fast, like with NASA Director Brian Welch. Contrary to nasa agents, APOLLO Moon denial started without Bill Kaysing, 1/4 Americains did not buy it then. Doubts about the authenticity of the Apollo Moon landings *appeared first in December 1968 when Apollo 8 was launched.* The almost perfectly executed odyssey of Apollo 11 amazed many around the world, and some people doubted it was real.[17] The first book on the subject ("Did man land on the Moon?") was issued in Texas *by the mathematician James J. Cranny in 1970.* Brian D. Welch, a veteran public affairs officer for the space agency and NASA's Director of Media Services, suffered a heart attack days after a public response to accusations. He was 42. NASA commented on some of the conspiracy theories in June 1977.[19] But in August 1997, their Director of Media Services (1998-2000) Brian Welch (1958-2000) said in an interview with Sky TV News: “This is thirty year old stuff... I don't understand why we should spend the time to... prove to people that we went to the Moon; in fact of matters we did go to the Moon.” - THAT'S IT FOLKS, MAN COULD NOT DO IT.

@narajuna

3 жыл бұрын

Repression is full on this video; now only pro comments are allowed in the TOP Comment section. In thee other one threads get deleted if not Accounts. Never so much policing inside Hoax videos.

Hahaha "my check came from NASA." Great video, well explained!

@TheCyrix1

5 жыл бұрын

@@davidfann3433 You have no mind : you're an adept of the flat earth CULT... then nothing to change !

@paulbeardsley4095

5 жыл бұрын

@@davidfann3433 Have you ever heard of burden of proof? I'm curious - but not very curious - why people like you think anybody cares what you believe. The simple fact is, there are people who don't know much about the Moon landings. They are the ones who think it was all fake. There are other people who have a reasonable knowledge of the Moon landings. They are the ones who know it really happened.

@jbusa6630

5 жыл бұрын

@@davidfann3433 try lithium, that should change your mind.

@karenandtedkr

5 жыл бұрын

Why is it that you people always attack the person and never address the facts?

@karenandtedkr

5 жыл бұрын

6Your responses combined amount to a personal attack suggesting the gentleman has no mind(impossible) a baseless assertion that "NO ONE" cares to hear the gentlemans thoughts or ideas(dismissive) along with a suggested psych medication being the answer for this gentleman and his underlying mental disorder(convenient)

I came here watching because Everyday Astronaut recommended it. Great video :)

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

You got 2 likes, but no one expanded on your very complimentary posting here...without a doubt video is most definitive evidence that man stepped on the moon, hands down! I’m gonna give you a like for this one because it is what is expected from the schoolteacher😎👍 >>>> American Moon (English Version) kzread.info/dash/bejne/faSprddsdpOoprw.html

@shawncrossen7580

3 жыл бұрын

Collins claim on this video has been completely DEBUNKED. Just because a person (Collins) says it does not make it any more fact.... kzread.info/dash/bejne/kaxom86Cnd3dZdY.html

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

@@shawncrossen7580 yeah well that is what the self declared "Qualified" do all the time, then they ask you for Definite Evidence. He is not sure they walked on Moon, but sure the had the Tech, was sure of film tech after asking others then less sure, so "impossible" turned to "unlikely".

@shawncrossen7580

3 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 Even if this Collins is an expert and even if he was right in what he said, which he wasn't, his sense of arrogance and snippy attitude in this video really makes him unlikable, for lack of a better word.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

@@shawncrossen7580 yeah the homosapien had the nerve to accuse Jarrah of being condescending... rant about selling the Soul... when he has no belief in that. One wonders what state his rational Mind is.

This is my favorite debunk video. Short, concise, perfect.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

There would be no "debunk"(🤣) without bunk. Love his above average highly intelligent Believer /Debunker looks (+hat too).🤯 (More to be seen on his Account👍) (😂)

@apolloskyfacer5842

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna ◁==== keep in mind that this troll is a 'closet' adherent of the Flat Earth and Magical Dome Cult. It only 'outs' itself as such when the comments indicate that it's safe do do so. Go on Mr WO. Tell us all about how you believe the Earth is a flat disc. We all know you want to. 🙃

I love how NASA hires one of the greatest film makers of all time to fake the moon landings, but he and all of the engineers forgot to put stars in the sky, forgot there was no air on the moon to move a flag (how did wind get in a movie studio?), forgot everything they know about lighting and shadows, left marks on props and forgot about how footprints might work in dust. You have to believe all of that was missed, so actually their own claims of problems in the filming prove that no movie person was used at all, because no one would have made those idiotic errors.

@eventcone

4 жыл бұрын

I guess the film maker you are talking about ("one of the greatest film makers of all time") is Stanley Kubrick. Yet his movie 2001: A Space Oddyssey contains a huge number of errors. Whilst the Apollo Program footage contains ZERO "errors" (whatever you and assorted other idiots may think). If you're incapable, as your post suggests, of spotting any of the multitude of errors in 2001, who are YOU to judge the Apollo footage?

@nicsandee123

4 жыл бұрын

Tanstible- footprints in dust test, the easy way. 1. Get a bag of dry Portland cement. 2. Put 1/2 of it on on a large baking tray and then turn to oven to low and leave for 30 minutes. 3.this test is best done in winter after a period of very cold, dry weather > less moisture 4. Pour dry cement on a dry surface, make it about 1 1/2 “ deep (plywood or plastic sheet. 5. Walk in it , and guess what you get footprints. Cohesion is the key, that’s why sand don’t work.😎😉

@G-ra-ha-m

4 жыл бұрын

The fakers also forgot that the stones and rocks they photographed were not possible on the earth and that the sand they used and claimed was 'sharp dust' was retroreflective. 1A Photos: www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5912.jpg history.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/AS15-82-11140.jpg history.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-106-17377.jpg history.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-106-17393.jpg history.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/AS16-116-18629.jpg history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-140-21496.jpg 1B Physics: 1. How can an object land on a soft dusty surface yet make no mark? 2. How can an object become buried in dust yet remain free of dust? 3. How can an object have it's corners worn away? 1C Proof: Either the NASA photos were taken on the earth or the laws of physics are all wrong. 2 Moon dust retro-reflection effect - reflecting the light straight back stronger. www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5882.jpg www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5854.jpg Indicates the photos were taken on sand rather than the footprint friendly sharp dust that NASA claims. www.roadvista.com/reflective-glass-beads/

@G-ra-ha-m

4 жыл бұрын

@@nicsandee123 Portland cement doesn't exhibit the retro-reflection we see www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5882.jpg www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5854.jpg so they had to have used damp sand.

@G-ra-ha-m

4 жыл бұрын

@@eventcone "Whilst the Apollo Program footage contains ZERO "errors"" Haahaha!! It is loaded with major errors.

So they faked it on the moon to make it more realistic?

@therealzilch

5 жыл бұрын

It was the only way to make the fake convincing.

@therealzilch

5 жыл бұрын

@Huy Taing No, "Nasa" in Hebrew means "to lift or raise". "Nasha" means "to deceive". Look it up- the standard work is Strong's Concordances. Not that it makes any difference. Why would NASA put their real intentions in plain sight, if they aim to deceive? It makes no sense whatsoever.

@therealzilch

5 жыл бұрын

@Huy Taing No, I'm a globe Earth knower.

@imagoportraits562

5 жыл бұрын

@Huy Taing There are many words in Hebrew that mean lie or deceive and nasa is not one of them. The fact you believe this without checking is why you believe lots of other nonsense, it's called gullibility.

@JustTheFacts317

5 жыл бұрын

@@imagoportraits562 so to believe we are on a spinning ball that is moving through space and spinning/moving at astronomical speeds is not being gullible

A really sad loss.

I first watched this 5 years ago and was reminded about it doing the dishes today . it is better every time you watch it

This video is phenomenal however I have to disagree with his statement that "nowadays it would be easy to fake the moon landings", I am sure what he means is that it would be easy to fake some of the footage but there is still no way to fake the tracking of the Apollo missions. Transmissions from the Apollo crafts moving from earth orbit, to the moon, into moon orbit, landing and returning to earth were tracked by people all over the world. The transmission source can not only be pinpointed as to how far it is from earth but also the speed of the craft due to doppler effect. There was no way to fake it then and there still isn't. Another detail is that the radio and television signals traveled at different speeds, as the Apollo crafts moved further and further from earth the delay between the signals increased which is another giveaway that they really were transmitting from the moon. Oh and one more detail, by Apollo 14 we began using the rovers of which there exists hours of footage. The footage of the dust being kicked out by the tires not only proves that they were in 1/6th of earths gravity but also in a vacuum as the dust clearly is not being met with air resistance. If you think NASA had a way of creating a movie set in 1969 that was not only 1/6th earths gravity but also a vacuum about 2 acres in size and in which you are unable to see the supporting walls and structure on film you are certified batshit crazy and not to mention crazy, crazy dumb!

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

Well said. However, when Collins is talking about faking it, I think he means solely in film/video terms. It certainly wasn't possible to simulate 1/6 gravity and vacuum convincingly back then. It's probably not possible now either, but I'm not sure about that.

@Jan_Strzelecki

4 жыл бұрын

@@paulbeardsley4095 I think we're very close to photorealistic human simulations (at least Hollywood seems to be), so if you put such footage through a low res filter, and simulate all the physics... Maybe? :)

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

@@Jan_Strzelecki I wouldn't be surprised if they could do it now. But they didn't even try to fake Mars' gravity when they filmed The Martian 5 years ago.

@Jan_Strzelecki

4 жыл бұрын

@@paulbeardsley4095 They did, however, try to fake lunar gravity in "The first Man". And if they really wanted to make a convincing fake, they would have tried to fake the proper gravity as well.

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

Jan Strzelecki I’ve not seen First Man yet. Did you think it was convincing?

The moon landing was actually filmed in a film studio on Mars, using Stanley Kubrick's iPhone.

@tomjones239

5 жыл бұрын

So THAT`S what they did! I KNEW IT! Damned NASA fakers!

@Supermike057

5 жыл бұрын

He was the highest paid boy scout in vietnam

@apassionfortangling3671

5 жыл бұрын

LMAO

@Unborn-Stillborn

4 жыл бұрын

@Lissajous Curved im a paddy but what are u doin here ?

@questioneverything8301

4 жыл бұрын

They not only never went to the moon, they never even went above low earth orbit.

The slow motion techniques would not do. In the moon videos you can clearly see that only the free fall vertical moving is slowed down, while the horizontal movements are at the expected speed (like the dust thrown from the rover wheels). So, it was absolutely impossible without the nowadays technology.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

strange this Expert backed up with "bloody unlikely". Educated folks just know (usa)Government always has advance technology first.

@Anthonyspartan514

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna yes but at the time they did not

The guy is an expert, a natural comedian who spit facts. He really knows how to narrate deadpan but not boring.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

You think the USA GOV hires unprofession idiots with no talent? Da Comedian he is ....because film wise.... aint no Kubrick :) (Likes to pick all sorts of cherries) Note: here is the typical follower of this genius : kzread.infoAblOHbFKCp0

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Too bad he can not do same with historical forward Leap ARTEMIS , the incredible Technology to film fake exist now :( So we could witness just *anything* ....

@hankkingsley9183

Жыл бұрын

You are not addressing the issue at hand. Did you even watch this video? This is about the live broadcast in 1969 and your claim that everything is fake. A massive preponderance of the evidence supports that the moonshot happened and every single hoaxer claim has been debunked again and again.

@hankkingsley9183

Жыл бұрын

Your argument seems to be that because something could possibly be fake that therefore everything IS fake. I suggest studying the laws of logic with a side helping of learning about how to think rationally.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Ah that famous massive preponderance /mountain of proof..... yet many Engineers and books and videos and documents and media address the issue.... again and again

I’ve never been taken in by the whole moon landing hoax idea but never before thought that, from a filmmaker’s perspective, it just wasn’t possible to fake it back then. Love the video and and the wonderfully sarcastic presentation. Great job.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

...but you still made it here? ONE filmmaker, one, never heard of, no Kubrick, and sure never any any thing close to NASA Studios budget and ressources.

@DevinJarosz

4 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 The Military couldn't fake it back then and their budget was a lot bigger than NASA's. Look at the facts, don't be an idiot. Idiot

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

@@DevinJarosz Fact what Facts? You a 5 star General or what, an other top Filmmaker? Collins looks like and idiot, and is :(

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

Really no one having filming history could buy the crap of this video. Yes slow motion was a thing back in 1950's and perfected in the 1960's. The sales to the public was not till the late 1970-1980's. However companies such as NASA or the developers had full access to the system and testing steps. Suggesting that the companies like NASA could not use said things is just ridicules.. In the movie production there is a list of equipment that in fact does do slow motion in 1950's The technology was not cheep. Okay However by the mid 1965's the technology was able to be used may times at a much better value. This technology by the 1969 was not only reliable but they could create hours of the effect. By the 1970's this was so simple to do that cost and effect was simple. Yet that is a editing tool. We also know that they had cameras that also could do the effects. The first one was in 1962. The fun thing is the film used was a standard used in these type of cameras. Suggesting this technology was not created when it is documented it was is a slap in the face of every movie creator and editor in the world. During the movie 2001 space odyssey they did use this technology a few times they only found that they only used it a few times because most of the effects could be done practically. This Collins is very silly to suggest many of what he states. Just to be clear this Collin is a idiot. No wonder produces nothing. A Filmmaker could spend hours pointing out the error in this guys babble, no wonder no one with back him up even if many are Believers.

@nicsandee123

4 жыл бұрын

Wild boar the filmmaker is not disputing the existence of filming in slow motion. He’s taking about the viability of transferring the motion caught on 35 mm film to video tape. And some of the things that may happen while doing so. If you state that is live footage on that little screen they filmed for TV. If it didn’t look convincing someone would notice. One day you will have to except the fact that not everyone is stupid, it’s easy to everyone is stupid but it’s just not the case!

"My check just came from NASA". BAHAHAHAH!!!🤣🤣🤣. THAT WAS AWESOME!! Thanks for the great video.

@GloriaDahlke

4 жыл бұрын

You're so right 😂

@watkinsrory

4 жыл бұрын

My parents are pissed because they wasted all that money on my education and I am still so stupid. Dumb idiots.

@tarsis2005

4 жыл бұрын

@@watkinsrory If you were stupid you would never say so. Actually all stupid ones that I ever meet think thenselves as the smartest. Conclusion : your parents did the right thing.

@JLar-bb5hl

4 жыл бұрын

Too true, I'm afraid. "In plain sight" etc...

@viejaspeliculasfilipinas3621

2 жыл бұрын

@@watkinsrory found an American. Oh poor thing, look what politics did to you.

no one literally no one: conspiracy theorists: science doesnt exist

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

dear dear are you upset? They need your help to make up more rejections, not enough for you? That's Theorists, Some Reality doesnt exist, all sorts of mad philosophing, some say Mankind is an 'error of Nature'; and we are just meaningless purposeless chemical driven blobs going back to eternal oblivion bliss. Are you a sane believer in Primate origin? Happy & Proud, why you love Science Academia, so forget Those who speak of Intelligence and futur. In NASA trust.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

O the existencial question... does *SCIENCE* exist or not? Is She in Space with The Flying Spaghetti Monster? O SCIENCE take *mercy* on us poor wretched creatures out of Nothingness, have piety on us Adolerators!

@RealityIsTheNow

3 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 Wow. THAT sort of rant is why people laugh at you insane, self-deluding, scared shitless of reality conspiracy theorists. You people are naïve sheep who believe whatever you're told.

@Cod4Wii

3 жыл бұрын

Normal people: It's science. Conspiracy theorists: CGI, fake news, hoax, liars!

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

That sort of rant gets rattled good boys, gets lots of attention, just got 5 letters from One courageous :) ps: YES the Vatican has created Science, but as Her existing, being cognizant?

This is pretty damn wonderful. Also, it's always interesting when you find an old video whose comments have been so consistently active and populated by regulars that it's pretty much become like an entire subreddit.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

More brainstorming! Intersting indeed, bet you dont remember Me here ("for yearS"), O some Regulars "partimers" have returned and a few have taken leave... perhaps due to One insufferable incomprehensible wordsalad ignorant guy.... But the *wonderful* Filmaker (who doesnt care at all for APOLLO) is receiving many praises anymore. The Sapien intelligence and hat looks dont compensate.

This guy is awsome. I’ve never seen some one debunk so much.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

A conspiracy people hater like you must not see much of 'moms basement' Debunkers. But Some can not stay away....

@dntgswgoh8052

4 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 I scrolled through so many comments just to see your comments everywhere and you're like the only one that seems to think that way + it feels like you keep copy pasting info from various websites, i even saw you quoted wikipedia which is not reliable because it can be edited by any one. the point I'm making right now is that no one gives that much shit about the moon landing apart from you. Are you trying to prove something to yourself by spending your whole day answering to youtube comments?! its only showing you need to constantly remind yourself of what you believe to actually believe it and it looks ridiculous. Anyways, have a good day.

@ViralOpinion

Жыл бұрын

Ever research Operation Fishbowl?

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

According to NASA, the primary materials used in the lunar module were aluminum alloy, stainless steel, titanium, nickel steel alloy, and heat-resistant glass. The melting points of these materials range between 671°F and 2750°F. However, the heat in the thermosphere - which the Apollo space craft would have to travel through in order to get to the moon - reaches temperatures of more than 3600°F. It is quite clear we don’t have materials on earth able to withstand those temperatures. Therefore, there’s no way the lunar module ever went to the moon. Mr Awesome kzread.info/dash/bejne/X56Gr7eRYpCcisY.html 👍

@Conserpov

Жыл бұрын

Meanwhile, a real forensic film expert actually recreated "Moon landings" footage using 1960-s technology and also did full show-and-tell of that.

Important Message: No Astronauts got hurt in the making of this video

@starktrek7477

5 жыл бұрын

youre great!

@nicsandee123

5 жыл бұрын

I’m sure they didn’t but unfortunately over the years I’m sure some their feelings were ask Bart Sibrel he was there when Buzz smacked him! Nice👍

@EdEditz

5 жыл бұрын

No, they were all killed after this video was made, so they'd keep stumm. ^___^

@marshalllhiepler

5 жыл бұрын

Additionally ... No lunar dust was disturbed during the landing either. Yeah, those astro-nots were more than heros. They were ... MAGICAL.

@therealzilch

5 жыл бұрын

@@marshalllhiepler No dust was disturbed? There are photos of dust trails caused by the landing, as might be expected.

searched so hard just to find this video again! literally becomes better every time I watch it

The best KZread video of this century? I am beginning to think so. 35% of Americans need to watch it before they vote in November 2020.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

35%? Thought it was 20% of unbelievers, bunch of Neutrals thou. What has to do with Elections? Trump is all for a... return :)

@stelley08

3 жыл бұрын

People STILL vote? LOL ... why?

@narajuna

3 жыл бұрын

Whats the deal, trump is for a 2024 moon land, now for sure it is not happening.

love the "oh my check from NASA" LOL

@DudeHomer

4 жыл бұрын

.....because THAT was the ONLY true part!

@YDDES

4 жыл бұрын

Instead, describe what is wrong about what he says, please...

@DudeHomer

4 жыл бұрын

@@WilliamBTCWallace do you REALLY ACTUALLY BELIEVE that Nixon had a live phone call (with no time delays, by the way) with an astro-NOT from (supposedly) 200,000+ miles away, while thousands of people TODAY cannot even get a cell phone signal???? It was staged in a Hollywood basement by Stanley Kuberick! WHY are no stars there? WHY are there shadows from multiple angles if the sun was the only illuminating source? WHY were there NO "lunar dust" on the landing pads? WHY were the (supposed) "moon rocks" given to the Netherlands to be analyzed determined to be FAKE? WHY do you and millions of others have cognitive dissonance? ARE YOU GETTING THE PICTURE NOW? The government has been LYIING to everyone for decades!!!! WAKE UP, sheeple!!!

@ArboristUk

4 жыл бұрын

Wayne Reynolds poor Sheeple, I’m glad I’m not in the loop. The moon landings were an epic human achievement.

@DudeHomer

4 жыл бұрын

@@ArboristUk How's the Kool Aid taste????

Has anyone ever really seen anyone on the moon?

@marshallcello1128

4 жыл бұрын

@TwentyEighthParallel Also, Pete Conrad-Alan Bean, Alan Shepard-Edgar Mitchell, David Scott-James Irwin, John Young-Charles Duke, Gene Cernan-Harrison Schmitt.

@marshallcello1128

4 жыл бұрын

TwentyEighthParallel ha ha - I don’t have them memorized (but do know a number of them - incl of course some of the command module pilots). :-)

@zhartheProprietor

4 жыл бұрын

I saw General Zod there.

@howardbaxter2514

4 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure the astronauts saw each other on the moon. Checkmate.

@howdyneighbors4396

4 жыл бұрын

@@howardbaxter2514 pretty sure is not definitely , even your subconscious being has doubt. I also like chess, is this is when you flip over the board and walk away cursing

"No, they don't, go outside and see how shadows work." My man roasted an entire community with such elegance 💀

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

? You are his 'Companion'? Rather broad, no specifics on community, the One that a *LOT* outside HELP at refuting still its Skeptics way after (2012) this.... roast ?

@protastudios

8 ай бұрын

​@@narajunaAre you some kind of parody of a reddit user, or...?

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

?@@protastudios I dont know, could be, not a reddit man, nor a HOMOerectus either, so your man roasted who? Far as I know he got directly roasted by Jarrah White, and the "impossible" became possible "bloody unlikely" she cried....

@protastudios

8 ай бұрын

@@narajuna I don't even know what you're on but I want some of it.

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

@@protastudios sure still refuse to answer what you do with Your Man! (you better be a man....too), well some homo"sapien" you are, your elegance and roasting is to be desired. ((kzread.info/dash/bejne/X2euyryqmbbLZcY.html))

Yeah in December 1971 there were 410,000 people working on Apollo and every one of them never said a word that it was all Fake! Amazing.....

@narajuna

25 күн бұрын

? Their shop work was fake !?? They had firsthand knowledge what went on in SPACE !? Amazing.....

My Grandfather was 90 years old when this happened. He said it was a fake. He had never seen a rocket launch. I took him to Cape Canaveral to watch a launch. Before he died at 99 he told me that he believed because he had seen it take off. He wanted to believe.

@hcwoolfgmailcom

5 жыл бұрын

Steve, You did Good!

@scottl5000

5 жыл бұрын

That is awesome Steve! My granddad was 93 when the Apollo 13 mission "changed". I asked him if it was fake. He said no way. I asked him if they would make it home, he said, there are 100's of thousands of people working on it. They will come home. :Engineers are very crafty." That statement stuck with me for my entire life. (he was an power system engineer that helped set up commerical power grid in Salt Lake and San Fran). I miss that guy.

@WarHog38KCS

5 жыл бұрын

All theater to enliven ever sagging TV ratings. Who wanted to watch a lot of terribly blurry film made in the Apollo Valley in Hawaii? All made intentionally blurry to better deceive the public of NASA's chicanery. Our Deep State in full throttle action after killing the president that first envisioned a moon landing after he publicly criticized them and then profiting making billions of dollars off faking his vision. Just terrible times all wrapped around that same Deep State's Vietnam War that dragged on a damn decade killing 55,000 when bombing Hanoi which was finally done in very late 1972, would have ended that war in a few months at any time. The Deep State elitist had to reap those war machine profits just like on those bullshit moon landings faked on TV over & over six times by Nixon for bucks. Nixon stopped them after he became entangled in the Watergate Hotel burglary that caused his resignation before certain impeachment. Just bad times as now.

@scottl5000

5 жыл бұрын

@@WarHog38KCS The moon landings were an inspiration that really helped a troubled world -- I was there -- so many great technologies came out of it, including those that lead to the internet and the very computer you are using to read this. If we in the same bad times now, then doing another landing (fake or not) again in 2025(?) will be an inspiration to help jump us to the next level in soceity. People need something to believe in, something that we create ourselves across all beliefs and walks of life. What I really don't get is how you convert facts into fiction. Yes there are lot's of facts that neighsayers bring up, and EVERYTIME they just reinforce we went to the moon. Thse are facts and proofs, not just words and are repeatable everytime. But just because you SAY it's a lie, then it's a lie? I say it's the truth, so it's the truth... NO! I make mistakes, they get corrected and we move on with the tested truth. But I support your cause, so I challenge you to this... Why don't you test it yourself, try to prove we DID go to the moon, play devils advocate, using the best hardest facts and deepesr research you can. Let's say you (like me) are actually being fooled into thinking we didn't go when we really did, so you set out to prove we went. If you are right and we didn't go, then your test will fail and you will be right. And if you cannot prove it, and I mean dig like you MUST prove it. Then have a math or physics person check your answers. If you fail to provide absolute proof we went, then you have a fighting change of being belived. But you got to try really really hard to provde we went if you want to lift the vail of lies... If not, you are just another bag of air making baseless assertions on partial facts and ignorance. What a sad use of a brillant mind if you don't try.

@WarHog38KCS

5 жыл бұрын

@@scottl5000 I was aware of the moon landings as a big about grown boy. I watched very little of that blurry moon film when in comparison a person could watch crystal clear real good regular TV programming. However I did watch Armstrong descend that ladder. I did believe the moon landing then and did so until the computer age. I really actually never thought much about them. I have had my decades believing for the good of this country. I also had the battle you suggest within my psyche when I started watching the vast amount of material on the internet that questioned the validity of those moon landings. I initially thought those people questioning the government & media narrative on those moon landings & 9/11, were total crackpots. Then I diligently studied it all as you suggested. Immense radiation problems concerning the Van Allen Radiation Belts and Deep Space Heavy Particle Radiation throughout space caused by solar flares and quasars and the like. I even studied recent NASA released information where scientists & physicists fully acknowledging those deadly radiation problems concerning humans in space travel outside earth's orbit. All this while knowing the Apollo astronauts had absolutely no radiation shielding. Then I saw film where several supposed Apollo moon astronauts didn't even know the Van Allen Radiation Belts existed. I saw the somber film of those Apollo 11 astronauts at their post moon mission news conference. Somber as at mom's funeral instead of happy about just completing that supposed spectacular moon mission and crazily talking of never seeing stars the whole mission. Orbiting the moon, they should have logically seen stars. Then I saw where an airliner that was nearly 50 feet high and 147 feet in width disappeared inside a 20 foot circular hole at the Pentagon with over 150 people on board. I saw where an actual airliner crash at Camp David was first reported that same 9/11 morning and then forever ignored by the media thereafter. I saw where five Israelis with several being Mossad members set up cameras prior to the twin towers being hit and were seen celebrating as the towers exploded. They were arrested by NYC police and then released a few days later. You can believe government versions if you so wish through hell & high water. I just will not anymore. I see it all as a evil Deep State of globalist zionist billionaire elites that have this nation by the throat with the intention to destroy this country while they reap billions. Read the Georgia Guidestones.

Very convincing. People who aren't 70 like me don't recall how bulky and primitive tech was years ago. I used to program a huge disk based IBM 1130 with a stack of punch cards.

@kimbalcalkins6903

4 жыл бұрын

I ran my first programs on the same machine using punched cards in Los Alamitos, Ca

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

I never programmed with punched cards, but I did program with switches on an Altair 8800.

@MrMarco855

4 жыл бұрын

Nice try apologist, save the bull shit for someone else.

@nicsandee123

4 жыл бұрын

Speaking of saving Mr Marco. Why don’t you spare us from your singular and devastating repartee

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

@@nicsandee123 Don't rain on his parade. I think he's cute.

Excellent video. We must use our knowledge for rational purposes and stay vigilant on the real conspiracies that are occurring now.

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

what real conspiracies?

@dougdig

8 ай бұрын

@@narajuna How minimum wage hasn't changed since 2009, how healthcare and college tuition is a ripoff, endless wars, etc...

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

@@dougdig ....those are Conspiracies? And require Vigilance? Wars yes kind of on excuses, nothing new, nope not clear watchlist right now. Not One of these MSers wish to specify what NASA Owners are doing against its Citizens, aside a too popular "Gov lies", not ONE Conspiracy is given any value, Watergate was a close call with lucky Paper backing.

@shigshug8581

8 ай бұрын

@@narajuna You should watch the end of the video when the film maker says the government would rather have you questioning the moon landing then actual conspiracies.

@narajuna

8 ай бұрын

Yeah yeah I hear the HOMO"sapien" @@shigshug8581 not sure about *that* as continual deceiving is base on their old Con, to which they wish not to lose at all. AGAIN "actual conspiracies" vagueness, I AM ASKING YOU SMART SANE SCIENCE GUYS FOR *>>>>ONE(1)

Most of the more popular conspiracy theorists now admit the moon landing was real. Even the director of American Moon was caught admitting his documentary was just entertainment.

@federalinvestigation9962

2 жыл бұрын

Nope, its amazing how well they plan it. You can't leave the earth. God made the earth. We are important, the moon isn't a physical object we can get to

@albertawheat6832

2 жыл бұрын

@Andre Hello it's me again, (LOL) According to your wording of this comment, It implies we haven't been yet. Just asking.

@albertawheat6832

2 жыл бұрын

@Andre Do you know why the Ditched the moon landings and moved on to mars ?

@albertawheat6832

2 жыл бұрын

@Andre Between you and I, I have never heard anyone else voice this point of view.

@albertawheat6832

2 жыл бұрын

@Andre Congress' appropriation for fiscal year 2022 increased NASA's annual budget by 3% to about $24.24 billion, short of the 7% increase the Biden administration sought. The agency's Science Mission Directorate received a 4% increase to $7.6 billion, which was itself short of the 9% boost requested.Apr 8, 2022. For roughly four minutes of weightlessness in suborbital space, the richest man alive spent around $5.5 billion. Bezos is worth approximately $205 billion, so paying for an exclusive space flight didn't really affect his day-to-day budgeting.Jul 20, 2021 How much has Musk spent on SpaceX? But the cost ended up being too high, and instead, Musk started a spaceflight company called Space Exploration Technologies Corp., or SpaceX, now based in the Los Angeles suburb of Hawthorne, California. He spent a third of his reported fortune, $100 million, to get SpaceX going.Apr 27, 2022

Lol my check came from NASA

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

Kubrick and a lot of studio, and artists got such cheques!

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

To assist in the greatest scam pulled on Humanity. Well maybe the second, or third.The word NASA is a derivative from these words used in the Bible. In its original Hebrew it is נָשָׂא (naw-shaw’) spelling “Nasha” Strong’s Concordance Hebrew Dictionary list the definition for word #5377 (beguiled as used in Genesis 3:13), … So NASA’s prim. Root; is: to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce:-beguile, deceive., X greatly, x utterly.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

Not same spelling but same prononciation. No just heard he lended his 2001 studio for them to use. How much he assisted on least the first one I dont know, NASA /NSA had their crew.The rest was done in USA, they have similiation grounds, just as the Mars practice landscapes.

@wildboar7473

4 жыл бұрын

No idea, if impossible to alter I guess that guess is wrong, but he obviously knew much about, became paranoid for one reason.

@daveyjones9930

4 жыл бұрын

Delow USMC "check from NASA". My favorite part of Mr. Collins' video!!

I think the biggest more obvious thing to me was the Soviet Union would have screamed it was fake if it was a hoax. They had their own monitoring stations and they undoubtedly saw stages of the landing, rockets and other maneuvers.

@DaveHammondDublin

6 жыл бұрын

this is a great well made interesting video .....but there are still some doubts that even fair minded people have about NASA , the politics of the time , the fact Richard Nixon was President , the reality that NASA still to this day says we are working on how to manage the radiation of the van allen belts , the reality that if you look at still photos ( for example the boots on the astronaut decending have a very distinctive reflection more common with a second source of lighting - he dodnt rebuff that in this ) and finally in the height of the cold war nothing the Russians would have said would have been believed - their actions are more curios - having beaten the US in all other apsects of space exploration - first sputnik etc etc - they didnt put humans on the moon ? Ever ? hmmm...wonder why ??

@jonnytonto5298

5 жыл бұрын

360noscope How do you know? What if they faked it because it is impossible to ever go and they all know it but still want their people to believe in space so they can keep extracting money from them just like our government.? Think.

@tomthecasual5337

5 жыл бұрын

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

@johnhanek167

5 жыл бұрын

Actually he did talk extensively about the 2nd source of lighting theory. You might want to watch the video to get that.

@user-tt5js4bh2v

5 жыл бұрын

I think the biggest most obvious thing to me is that the Space Shuttle cost exponentially more than the Saturn V yet it could only manage 1/6th of the payload. Then there's the black smoke coming out of an apparently solid fuel pyro rocket ...... very suspiciously looking like a (liquid) fuel rich burn. Oh and then there's the complete and utter lack of any actual evidence of 1/6th earth gravity in any Apollo EVA footage.

"We seemed to have forgotten how do to it for real" lol this guy.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Yes but we have remembered how to fake it :)

KZread has been recommending this video to me since about the time S.G. Collins made it. I've watched it probably a dozen times. I'll probably watch it a dozen more, because each time I do, I enjoy it as much as the time before.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

Have you seen his responces to Jarrah White rebutal on his film technology claims? Jarrah White says it was possible :) RE: moon hoax not kzread.info/dash/bejne/X2euyryqmbbLZcY.html&feature=emb_logo 1:25 2:33 False Frame-rates. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hneBmZiMhsLKfso.html&feature=emb_logo Lots of stirring goes on this shit : kzread.info/dash/bejne/faSprddsdpOoprw.html

@eventcone

3 жыл бұрын

Have you seen Collins' response to Jarrah White? kzread.info/dash/bejne/X4iZzqxwZdPggJc.html

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

yes that is the one, see how the sapien man takes time on less important issues with a just a Hom_man who has sold his soul.... Litteraly craved for Jarrah's atttention for more, contrary to the more sensible Apolloists who dont find time to waste on million of times debunk's, shit that would be *creepy!* Note: My "posts do more damage to the "truthseekers'" cause than those of any Apollo Defender." but still seem to agitate those who are qualified..... :)

@nicsandee123

3 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 SAPIEN LIVES MATTER!!

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

Half a day and not inputs on the stupid enjoyment sharring, as always lame Comment get promoted to TOP section, I dump my "worthless Jarrah" bit for the rare who dont know much about Film possibilities...., hour latter a man who has lost time and found a life thous becoming part-time player serves more Collins :) So what does the gentleman devoid of *contempt* (aside prejudice) have to add to all his Science & Proof? Apparently its is an "aweful episode of his life" and he fears not to be able to move on... but still as many Sane he addresses minor points. 2:25... incomplete, has to talk to other older Experts, second hand.., wonder if his USA GOV "WE" having the Technology to go to the MOON is more complete??? Continuous broadcast.., he read somewhere (no wonder he is "brillant"), then the... dude drops a rubbber hammer for timing.., we Hoaxters reject the Greatest Mankind leap but dont doubt the real hammer? On that shity granny footage you can tell if its steel or foam? I can not but know Some who *know...* :) So the man who doesnt care /against this non-important Conspiracy (blinding from *real* ones)(for Crazies or the Sane that oppose us?) had not given ALL THE DETAILS previously, also know Some who conclude from that: cheating Crooks :)

I've never understood how anybody could come up with the (moon landings were fake) conspiracy, if they only did it once I could see people thinking that, but six times?

@Cod4Wii

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly, even just faking it twice would be a miracle....but faking this worldwide event 6 times? Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17, and then keeping it a secret for over 50 years while fooling every scientist in the world including the Soviets? Not even a miracle can save the ridiculousness of this stupid conspiracy theory. This is not even including the 3 extra manned missions that only orbited the moon, Apollo 8, 10, and 13, and all the rocket test and test flights from Apollo 1-7, Mercury, and Gemini missions combined. If they were going to fake the moon landings, why go through all the trouble and effort building those expensive rockets, risking lives, spending lots of money, working diligently day in day out, for over a decade, only to fake it in the end, knowing one day they'll get caught eventually? AND then faking 5 more times increasing the risks of the getting caught...just complete nonsense, absolute rubbish.

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

Getting away with it six times just proves how big the conspiracy is. I suspect demonic involvement. Might even be a personal project of the Horned God Himself.

@lachrymarum_

4 жыл бұрын

Scott Wallace LOL Good one, Scott! I suspect you need a lobotomy.

@petediamond2721

4 жыл бұрын

@@lachrymarum_ 👏👏👏👍

@kimbalcalkins6903

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch here is some beautiful "footage", a great picture for an astronauts signature www.aulis.com/imagesfurther/15-86-11670print.jpg

I used to work in broadcast engineering back in the 80's. Everything you said about how primitive analog video was is absolutely true. I used to run those old 2" reel to reel ampex tape machines. yea some tv stations in the outback still used them. 1 hour reels if I remember correctly, no way to get bigger, slowing down the speed would fry the tape, especially back in the 60's. Tape had a shelf life of 10 minutes. Thank you for the video. Great points made here for all to see.

@groovinhooves

5 жыл бұрын

Yep, early 2" magnetic video was so unreliable that US Navy SONAR tapes off the submarines were sent *with* their recording unit (the unit replaced with another in the sub) to ONI to better ensure accurate playback. I've heard this anecdote now from nearly a dozen former USN sonar techs.

@mako88sb

5 жыл бұрын

Yes but all your guys practical experience is meaningless to the hoax believing crowd. Something doesn't look right to them so the only explanation is it was faked.

@therealzilch

5 жыл бұрын

@@mako88sb Yep. Belief in the hoax is a kind of religion for them, and the way things actually are in the real world doesn't matter.

@kashyapshirodkar7947

5 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch basically for them, whatever they don't understand is fake! They have no problem believing in heaven and hell but did we land on the moon? Neh that's fake!

@hcwoolfgmailcom

5 жыл бұрын

Danstaafl, How much did NASA pay YOU? 😁

I really hope that someday Buzz Aldrin watches this video so that when the narrator reaches the part where he says "I wasn't on the moon in 1969 and neither were you", Aldrin can be like OH YEAH??

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

Little obtuse, he is speacking to the common viewers, not nasa employees.

@MuchWhittering

3 ай бұрын

Most NASA employees have never been to the moon. Only 12 people have ever been.@@narajuna

@narajuna

3 ай бұрын

😲@@MuchWhittering Tell that to all the Shills and Quora parrots. @apolloskyfacer5842 RC 3 HOW COME NOT ONE PROFESSIONAL SPACE FLIGHT EXPERT AGREES WITH YOU ''MOON HOAXTARDS ? Were all 400,000 scientists, engineers and technicians who were involved in the Apollo Moon Program bribed or threatened into silence ? How did that world-wide cover-up work exactly ? And what happened to those who refuse to cooperate ? Were they murdered ? Were they zapped by that little flashy thingy the MIB used to stealthily reprogrammed their memories ?" xhundreds by Bot and Others

@narajuna

3 ай бұрын

oho not passing the censorship test ? What excuse this time??? Now what happen to the Classic >>>Were all 400,000 scientists, engineers and technicians who were involved in the Apollo Moon Program bribed or threatened into silence ?" All those are apparently *knowing* on Moon...

I suppose NASA could have had a hundred of those hard disk recorders, but then there's the matter of making sure they're all perfectly synced up.

Why did the apollo 11 post-flight media conference resemble a funeral?

@Schmidtelpunkt

4 жыл бұрын

Because they were tired and wanted to get home. Also it is not uncommon to be in a low mood the weeks after some life changing event.

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

Because the so called astronauts were actually Plutonians and Plutonians are naturally dour.

@Jan_Strzelecki

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch Neil A.=== Alien! :D

@kareemsalessi

4 жыл бұрын

BECAUSE::: any one of the NassHoles blowing the whistle would have resulted in their collective DEATHS !!!!

@Jan_Strzelecki

4 жыл бұрын

@@kareemsalessi And yet, you're still alive.

Dude, this was awesome! As a photographer for over 40 years the crazy hoaxers have made ME crazy. The stuff you say about lighting is SO obvious but I LOVE the deeper dive into the tech. Fabulous!

@paolojoosten6353

4 жыл бұрын

The shadows !

@JoeJohn777

4 жыл бұрын

How did they went through the Van Halen belt ?! Asshole !!!

@JoeJohn777

4 жыл бұрын

@DrBarrymoreDude The answer of another asshole who can not argue!

@stevebowers8936

4 жыл бұрын

What a Knob you are.@@JoeJohn777

@Albanez39

4 жыл бұрын

You really think they would have gotten the lighting wrong for such a project? XD Many hoaxers are just stupid religious people that also believe in flat Earth...others are intelligent individuals that don't have the blind trust of the US most others have...

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) launched in 2009 has sent back tons of pics and vids of the landing sites, right where NASA said they were.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

How old? Thats old old news, how do YOU know Mr LRO took them there? ONE (1) pic you can identify something? And I have doubt You can prove (or nasa) where they were taken. Nevada? note: this Jackson is not a shill.

@scoobtube5746

Жыл бұрын

Sounds like the time Colin Powell claimed to have pictures of Iraq's WMDs, LOL.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

@@scoobtube5746 yeah real crystal clear satellite imaging. Maybe Probes, or rocks.....

@jacksonmehoff4963

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna to see one needs only to look. Video orbiting a planet sorta rules out nevada. If we had not gone russia would have called us out. They didn't.

@jacksonmehoff4963

Жыл бұрын

@@scoobtube5746 actually WMDs were moved to turkey before we went in. Saddam used them in his own people.

RIP Collins. Love you brother ❤

@narajuna

7 ай бұрын

not us poor "just an other homos11:22" but may his chemicals be at peace :)

People forget that there is more audio than video. Much more. The video and/or film cache is a relatively small part of the Apollo programme - basically the TV footage shot on the moon plus the stills and the odd TV broadcast en route. It's what the doubters like to concentrate on. The audio, however, covers nine moon missions, each of which lasted a week or more. The astronauts were in pretty much constant communication with Mission Control, so (allowing for sleep periods etc) we're probably looking (at a rough guess) at 30 to 40 days' worth of audio taped material, somewhere between 720 hours and 960 hours. Now, how would you like to be the script-writer tasked with creating a radio programme lasting 720 to 960 hours? That's what you would need to fake it. Or the actors, or the director for that matter. Fortunately some of the tapes are extant so each of us is free to make a judgement about the material's authenticity. A good place to start (it's on KZread) is 'Apollo 13 Accident: Flight Director's Loop', all 6 hours of it . . .

@Godscountry2732

4 жыл бұрын

James, yes, and let's not forget the lunar transcripts, which anyone can read.NASA needs to better organize the historical and scientific databases on Apollo, making it easier for the layperson or conspiracy believer, to find this information. The internets algorithm is will quickly send a conspiracy believer deeper into the rabbit hole NASA should also direct people to Kipp Teagues www.apolloarchive.com/ an excellent resource of Apollo images "The Apollo project ", and other resources, if we're going to pull people out of the rabbit hole, let's make sure they have easy access to the correct information.

@muffspanker

4 жыл бұрын

Don't be STUPID!! NASA says it's 250 degrees on the surface of the moon. How the hell did they keep cool in 250 degree heat for 3 days with just battery power? So they had batteries in 1969 that lasted 3 days AND could keep your azz cool in 250 degree temps., but in 2019 your car is hot as hell in 90 degree temps. Where are those 1969 3 day batteries? There should be one standard in all cars. Dozens of kids die every year in hot cars because NASA won't share their battery technology from 1969. GTFOH!!!

@muffspanker

4 жыл бұрын

If you leave your cars headlights on for ONE HOUR, your car battery will be stone cold dead, but in 1969 NASA had batteries that lasted THREE DAYS!! Bull Sh--!! Now do you see how stupid you sound? Grrrrrrr

@WeWereYoungandCrazy

4 жыл бұрын

@@muffspanker you could be the dumbest guy I've ever communicated with.. So I'll type very slowly. While it's true that the temp in sunlight on the moon is approx 250 degrees F, like on the side of Lunar Lander facing the sun... In the shade, the temp is approx minus 250 degrees F. Like on the side of Lunar Lander facing away from the sun. Inside the lander there was air circulation, as there was inside their suits. It was all worked out by people much smarter than you and doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand. Similar technology works very well here on planet earth and is used in energy efficient houses.

@WeWereYoungandCrazy

4 жыл бұрын

@@muffspanker spaceflightblunders.wordpress.com/2017/03/03/the-fuel-cell-powered-lunar-module/ Silver Zinc batteries were placed around the lander and were more than enough to provide power for the 2 day stay. Even more batteries were added for the three day missions. So as long as the astronauts didn't forget to turn off the lander's headlights, they were fine.

"Excellent, my check came from NASA" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA That was great... XD Great video.

@drewthompson7457

4 жыл бұрын

@felix mendez : yes, I just got my cheque too!

@3ossomok588

4 жыл бұрын

it might be true though

@drewthompson7457

4 жыл бұрын

@@3ossomok588 : yes, I got my cheque.

@HelloKittyFanMan.

4 жыл бұрын

Absolutely!

I've seen your video at least a dozen times, and it's one of the few great works I value as much as the "Last Whole Earth Catalog" and Abbie Hoffman's "Steal This Book" ❤️❤️ You're in exalted company. 😉

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

You have not yet realised He isnt there? He gaveup /sold this masterpiece long time ago, doesnt care about any of it. Not on his Account, but his reply to Jarrah White was still. I contacted him :) This is a *distraction* to the more important....

The 10FPS was non-interlaced, so interlaced 29.97FPS actually needs not three but six times as many frames if you want it to look like it was shot on a TV camera.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

You are trying to educatd this... Director wonder? Jarrah White tried but the hat did not get it.

I have always said it would have been easier to go to the moon then to fake it, when a person adds the information in this video to the rest of what was needed for it to be a hoax and you have to conclude that it was easier to goto the moon then to hoax it.

@gianthills

9 жыл бұрын

that's an assertion without supporting evidence.

@KoolBreeze420

9 жыл бұрын

NOMAD FILMS The supporting evidence is this video combined with all of the other evidence video pictures moon samples and the thousands of people whom witnessed and a few years they even photographed one of the landing sites to the point where you could see the trails the astronauts made what I said is not merely assertions. What I said is based on all of the current information, perhaps your reading comprehension needs improvement! I say again. When a logical person adds the information in this video, to the rest of what was needed to hoax the moon landings then a reasonable person has no choice but to conclude that it would have been easier to goto the moon, then to hoax it.!!! This is not an assertion as you put because it is based on knowledge and facts...

@KoolBreeze420

9 жыл бұрын

NOMAD FILMS Like what?

@gianthills

9 жыл бұрын

no mainstream scientist will admit to the hoax only because its a cultural taboo to do so. the science is in on the matter and several legit analysts have debunked every aspect of the moon landing hoax. furthermore, China recently sent a probe to the moon to the very same location that the USA ostensibly landed and there was absolutely no evidence of the landing. they also discovered that the surface of the moon is not at all the same color as depicted in the NASA photos. the moon is a copper brown color, not gray as depicted by NASA. the surface is also rough, not smooth as depicted in the NASA (faked) photos.

@VideoFromSpace

9 жыл бұрын

NOMAD FILMS We want to understand why it comforts you to believe as you do.

Excellent work! The dose of satire is well presented.

@fivefingerfullprice3403

4 жыл бұрын

Actually all he did was prove it could be faked in a studio. He makes the assumption that it was a live broadcast when film was found of them rehearsing and screwing up the reflection of the Earth in low orbit.

@nihorothereal

4 жыл бұрын

@@fivefingerfullprice3403 Yes, now, but not then, as he clearly has stated. Can we get the evidence for your claim of said film? Reflection from what?

@fivefingerfullprice3403

4 жыл бұрын

@@nihorothereal Sure, go nuts. kzread.info/dash/bejne/n3d8qZiuequbfJs.html Also if you could let me know how they had lagless radio communication in 1969 from the Earth to the Moon that would be great since we still struggle with that today.

@FlourescentPotato

4 жыл бұрын

It's comedy, not exactly satire. but great video yeah!

@UncleKennysPlace

4 жыл бұрын

@@fivefingerfullprice3403 You didn't watch, did you? He indicated which steps would be required for a live broadcast of film. Even if it was VTR, same thing. But still, if you don't believe that the US put man on the moon, then you ignore evidence. Where's that film you allude to? Non-existent, of course.

Great video is there anywhere to watch the original moon landing? The actual live feed?

@Jan_Strzelecki

2 жыл бұрын

KZread.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

its rather dead by now.... but YT gives positiver results on that Search, its fake naturally, were not cameras on the MOON back than (lots now)(so many photographs of landers sitting with trash all around) -- enjoy the indoor grainy windlow view.

@maxfan1591

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. All you need to do is enter a term like "apollo landing video" in your search engine of choice, and make your selection.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

Here is one fine landing scene after 13:00 Humans never landed, Apollo moon hoax conspiracy theory /watch?v=JDqWaxfmbic&t=606s

@nicsandee123

2 жыл бұрын

But you know it’s probably fake right? Just the other day some geezer who’s never been in a rocket assured me it was, and that radio waves can’t travel through space. Apparently there’s a whole conspiracy behind it, Who knew?

Genuinely fun watch. This dude seems cool. Cheers, y'all.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

😄Yes fun alright, he is cool, should see him with a dress.... happy you like his Films🤩

Him: “If you shoot 1000 ft loads...” Me: Giggity!

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

Leave your fiddly bits out of this.

@nicsandee123

4 жыл бұрын

Celery, zinc capsules and water in large quantities will do the trick

@blacksabbath1022

4 жыл бұрын

The Russians know we would be dead. We work with them now. The argument that I hear most is the Apollo 11 put "lunar reflectors" on the moon so they had to have done it. The Soviets did the same thing in 1970 with a rover, which is what we used. If it was seriously done wed be doing it all the time and there wouldnt be so many anomalies around it. It's obviously a hoax.

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

@@blacksabbath1022 Why would we "be doing it all the time" now? The Apollo missions accomplished all that was really desired: to beat the Soviets and to research the Moon. Been there, done that, and it's extraordinarily more expensive than sending unmanned probes.

@ryanrobinson7651

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch oh so no reason to drill into the core of the moon? Perhaps their is diamonds, gold or even oil there. Why not find out? Why not put the Space force Military base on the moon? We have many reasons...

Like they said in the Mitchell and Webb sketch, "Wouldn't it be easier if we just popped to the moon and faked the landing there?"

@eyediealone1258

6 жыл бұрын

TammoKorsai There is a reason NASA doesnt train astronauts in a vacumn. It's "dangerous". But apparently no problem when out in the open vastness of space lol

@Schmidtelpunkt

6 жыл бұрын

Where does he talk about rocket engineering?

@luciencarr2388

5 жыл бұрын

shillslayer deny science, you mean like anyone who uses the word shill? You woketards have turned the word shill into a badge of honor. Shill seems to mean someone who understand basic science and who doesn't believe every conspiracy video they see. Do you also believe the Earth is flat? People who call others shills and sheep usually also believe the Earth is flat.

@luciencarr2388

5 жыл бұрын

Pete Piper no problems? Wether they really went to the moon and back they sure at least faked a bunch of problems. Take Apollo 13 for instance because they encountered major problems.

@Schmidtelpunkt

5 жыл бұрын

There are lots of pictures of places with lots of lights, which are sharp. As every photographer will tell you, the brightness makes it easy to get everything in focus as the depth of field is a lot broader than in a dark setting. Something you obviously neither knew nor bothered to look up when you wrote your comment. So, that is your level of expertise and research...

7:18 - Aldrin remembered to bring his emotional support animal, and was reminded to make sure it was rested and bathed.

I wish it was a normal world.

This clip is dripping with sarcasm!!! 🤣 😂 😅. Hey Maybe they shot on location? Ever thought of that?

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

That proves Kubrick was behind it. Perfectionist that he was, he would have insisted on shooting on location.

@jeffecker4052

4 жыл бұрын

The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.

@spanneraol

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch yea they went to the moon to shoot it.

@mrloop1530

4 жыл бұрын

It's also littered with pictures and sound.

@marcj3682

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch "That proves Kubrick was behind it. Perfectionist that he was, he would have insisted on shooting on location." The same Stanely Kubrick who was such a perfectionist, he shot Full Metal Jacket, a film set in Vietnam, in London?👍

Bravo!!!! Well done, Mr. Collins. Love that punch line at the end. My ex-next door neighbor is a Flat-Earther and NASA non-believer and there was simply nothing that I could present to him that would sway his unwavering belief system, no matter how factual, demonstrable, or logical the information. He would go on and on about how there is only one picture of Earth from space (huh?) and that every single photo of Earth was faked. No matter what I would say to him, I got an explanation of how and why it was a fake. Too much radiation, it would have destroyed the film, blah blah blah. The astronauts would not have survived the trip through the Van Allen Belt, etc. etc. He was convinced that I was just another indoctrinated fool led to believe the big lie. The sad part is that he is actually a very bright and intelligent individual, which confused me even more that he couldn't get his head wrapped around the evidence. For him, it is somehow easier to believe that the Earth is flat, the Moon, stars and planets are holograms and we live under a giant sapphire dome, surrounded by a 150 ft. wall of ice, off limits and protected by a global army. I'd love to hear his rebuttal to your video here. Thanks for sharing!

@josefdenis3799

5 жыл бұрын

I've heard it said that while the moon landing was 100% legit, the filming is faked. This is because camera would not work due to solar radiation or some shit that. This makes 100% sense to me for some reason even though i dont know the theory behind it

@carlschroeder6811

2 жыл бұрын

These types are simply delusional.

@carlschroeder6811

2 жыл бұрын

@@josefdenis3799 It depends on the type and strength of the radiation and the shielding from it. Do some research and you will have your answer.

So Kubrick films 2001 a Space Odyssey with a scene on the moon where astronauts walk in a straight line and do nothing else, but for NASA, he is able to produce hours and hours of film of astronauts jumping, hopping, falling, getting up, driving a buggy, doing experiments all with 1/6 gravity and all without the use of CGI? NASA was keeping some serious movie technology hidden in 1969 and kept it secret until 1986 when the first movie using CGI to remove wires was developed. LMFAO.

@StringerNews1

2 жыл бұрын

Kubrick learned from "2001" and demanded that the moon scenes be filmed on location after that.

@eventcone

2 жыл бұрын

What amused me most about 2001 was the conference room scene where Dr Heywood Floyd addresses various professional people at the Moonbase. Everyone moves EXACTLY as they would on Earth. The photographer in particular makes a very sudden change of direction which of course would be impossible in lunar gravity. I always wondered if Kubrick & Trumbull thought that no one would notice this stuff because the scene in question was set 'inside a room' on the Moon, rather than obviously 'outside' on the Moon's surface. Probably they were right - because I have only known one other person to mention it. :-) Hoax believers certainly never mention this stuff - quite the reverse because they always hold up "2001" as evidence that the technology and techniques existed for faking the Apollo moonlandings - yet they expect others to believe that they have the wherewithall to have penetrated moonlanding fakery by NASA! Hilarious!

@StringerNews1

2 жыл бұрын

@@eventcone funny you should mention Doug Trumbull, because contrary to what space deniers may think, someone actually had to drive all the special effects in such a movie, and that person isn't the director. We know that Trumbull was busy with his own directorial debut with _Silent Running_ so who filled those shoes? If "the government" was in such dire straits, why couldn't they coerce an American do work on the project? This is where half-baked ideas go to die....

@eventcone

2 жыл бұрын

@@StringerNews1 Indeed. And why risk asking non-American who could not be persuaded by ideals of "national interest" or patriotism.

No need for an explanation point in the title. Not surprising, because anyone who understands photography immediately sees that moon landing deniers do not understand photography.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

so you are saying this guys is an idiot? Still strange, so many explanations on Photography cause by Deniers 🤔

The thing about a fake moon mission is you still have to build and launch a gigantic expensive rocket to convince people you went, which just so happens to be the majority of the cost of an actual moon mission.

@RichardLoveless

4 жыл бұрын

TheRedScourge but the majority of funding comes from private investors witch the amount dose not require a disclossure

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

@@RichardLoveless Even if that were true, it doesn't change the argument.

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

Scourge- Kareem will be here soon to tell you that the Saturn V rockets were balloons. I kid you not.

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

@@therealzilch Indeed. I've stopped reading Kareems posts

@therealzilch

4 жыл бұрын

@@paulbeardsley4095 I just skim them for juicy insults. But he's been repeating himself a lot recently. He seems deflated somehow, if you know what I mean.

The thing that strikes me again and again about Apollo deniers is how credulous they all are. I've tried to imagine what I would be like if I were an Apollo denier. First off, I'd be like, "Wow, it was all faked, was it? Well I guess that would explain the absence of stars, the waving flag, surviving the Van Allen Belts and so on." But I wouldn't stop there. I would want to know what really happened. I've read a lot about the official account, and the more I learn, the more it fits together. So the "true" account should fit together even better, right? Yet nobody even tries to answer the question, "What REALLY happened?" Occasionally someone replies with, "Well, they faked it, of course!" But when you press them, they go silent, or say something stupid. Ask them how they faked 1/6 gravity and vacuum. Some of the answers I've received are: helium pouches, bouncy castles, falling lifts, as well as the old favourite, slo-mo and wires. Never mind that nobody has been able to replicate the effect. One person even replied with, "No need for me to explain how they faked it..." Ask them how come NASA brought back more than a thousand times as much rock as the USSR. They will do one of the following: a) Ignore the question. b) Mention the petrified wood in a Dutch museum, as if that were relevant. c) Suggest NASA had an unmanned probe. Because speculation about a major engineering work that nobody has ever witnessed counts as evidence, right? d) Tell you Von Braun went on a meteorite-gathering trip in Antactica, and then remind you that Von Braun was a Nazi, as if that were relevant. Imagine, you are "in the know" about the biggest secret in history, yet you lack the curiosity to find out how it was done. You can't even agree with your fellow deniers if it was filmed in a Hollywood basement or in some unspecified part of a desert that nobody has been able to locate in the 50 years since. If I were an Apollo denier, it would bother me that the US government were able to convince the people who MATTER. But all you ever hear from the actual deniers (apart from childish abuse) consists of reasons to be suspicious of the official account. You NEVER hear positive evidence of an alternative account. It's like listening to a politician telling everybody how bad his opponent is. But when someone asks, "But what do YOU have to offer?" he'll just come out with some more dirt (probably made up) about the other one. And it's obvious why. There is no coherent alternative account to the official one. Not even a draft one that mostly fits the facts more or less.

@eventcone

4 жыл бұрын

Excellent post Paul that goes right to the heart of the whole Apollo Hoax myth.

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

@@eventcone Thank you for your kind words. I am just so bored of the endless array of piddling little "anomalies" that we get challenged to debunk for the billionth time, whereas the other side produce nothing - NOTHING - of substance. The Moon landings happened, no doubt about it. We don't need to defend them. It's the deniers who should be defending their position.

@eventcone

4 жыл бұрын

​@@paulbeardsley4095 It may be that we are too defensive - I mean unnecessarily defensive. Just a thought.

@eventcone

4 жыл бұрын

@@paulbeardsley4095 P.S. Have you ever checked out www.apollohoax.net? It's not what it sounds like. The people there are highly competent engineers, scientists etc who know Apollo happened, and they invite Hoax Believers to bring their claims to them. But they have to be prepared to defend those claims. It's a great resource.

@paulbeardsley4095

4 жыл бұрын

@@eventcone "It may be that we are too defensive" I'm not sure. I sometimes think that if we respond to every "debunk this!" post there's a danger that we give them the wrong impression that they might actually have a point. We can appear to be playing by their rules, and we shouldn't be.

Informative and great insight. Thoroughly enjoyable video! Great memories from the time . And it seems I may be lucky enough to see more landings and exploration in a few years time! (Hurricanes permitting!) . 😮😃

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

😁 🤐 🤬 + edit: kzread.info/dash/bejne/rHlqsauJnLSZXZs.html 3:05 the impossible turns quickly to "blood unlikely). more intelligent Photographer with substance >>> kzread.info/dash/bejne/pXibyc17hbbAnJs.html Moon Photographs - *Expert Analysis* By A World Famous Photographer

@j.j.c.s2802

Жыл бұрын

​@@narajuna We really are in trouble, as a species, when people refuse to believe in things which they couldn't actually do themselves. I'm sorry, Mr Open, but I'm tired . Please give it a rest. If you want to hang out publicly, on YT and be strange, then please feel free, but not with me. I'm sure your basement is lovely, and mom cooks a mighty pie, but some of us have to get up for work every morning and greet the real world. When you have a great idea of your own, and not the usual torrent of arse water I read from you, let me know. Go and make a difference somewhere. Enjoy your pie! kzread.info/dash/bejne/eHpmsdqGoNfKgMo.html

@j.j.c.s2802

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna Eat the pie! Bye bye!

Radiation is currently a huge issue preventing lunar visits.

@nickrose8733

2 жыл бұрын

No it's not. It's an issue staying for more than 2 months at a time.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

Yes still a huge fact as all the others that have not been conquered. >>> Lead scientist for both the PREDICCS and the DoSEN project Schwadron says. "For example, on the *MOON,* there are ADDITIONAL HAZARDS from neutrons that are created by high-energy radiation interacting in the lunar soil and radiating OUTWORD from the surface." That "backsplash" of protons, which was discovered by CRaTER and is known as the moon's radiation "ALBEDO," is caused by the partial reflection of galactic cosmic rays off the moon's surface. This creates a surprising one-two punch of DEADLY radiation and can also be used to peer below the lunar surface like a geological probe. Says Harlan Spence, CRaTER deputy lead scientist and director of EOS, "UNTIL NOW, people have not had the 'eyes' necessary to see this particular population of particles. With CRaTER, we just happen to have the right focus to make these DISCOVERIES." - the futur looks bleak for romantic moon walks /skipping /hopping /bouncing... ....and even Golf!

@nicsandee123

2 жыл бұрын

Okay the other instruments aboard the LRO, mainly the camera are all sending fake data but strangely the CRaTER? And strangely all the articles I’ve read say the danger comes from prolonged stays. I guess it’s like going into something like the exclusion zone around Chernobyl, when you enter they give a dosimeter. , give you information about duration, dosage, I think the duration is limited to about 5 days at a time if you stay out of the hotspots. The length of stay, will be shortened if your exposure is high. 21 hrs on the moon for Apollo 11- probably playing it safe. Upon the astronauts return I’m sure their radiation tags were examined, giving them an idea of the time limit one can spend on the moon.

@nickrose8733

2 жыл бұрын

@Andre The only source they can provide for their arguments is found up their you know what.

@bifygif9154

2 жыл бұрын

@@nickrose8733 ok

Well that was a shockingly good video!

@sweetleilani6882

6 жыл бұрын

Danny Duchamp Bigtime. I need to keep reminding myself to never judge a book by it's cover. Funny as well.

@DavidWilsonHolmes

6 жыл бұрын

I wasn't going to bother watching this, glad i did though.

@thomaswijgerse723

6 жыл бұрын

definitly, never thought about it that way actually!

@polymath245

6 жыл бұрын

except the part where he lies about how old high speed photography is. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_photography

@breth8159

6 жыл бұрын

poly math in what way did he?

Thank you so much sir I just found this today. 50 years ago today I was in a jail in Texas with my brother my cousin and his best friend. We had done a few bad things. 😬 The police in Sherman Texas would not let us watch the moon landing, bastards. I’ve always believed we went to the moon and your explanation/satire is seriously best and most straightforward explanation I have ever seen. I will be sharing this for the rest of my life. And yes we got out of jail. Our actual lawyers name was Dean Martin. May I hope to shake your hand someday.

@shockingguy

4 жыл бұрын

Uncle Freddy first of all I was not in prison I was in jail. I’ve never been in prison. Why, well luck and good lawyers..That and I don’t engage in juvenile trolling. Grow the fuck up and go away

@kenkaneki1398

4 жыл бұрын

@@shockingguy well said

@sl4983

4 жыл бұрын

@Uncle Freddy do you like being a loser?

@steveameling2718

4 жыл бұрын

@whodannywho Hey there. Watch the recently released documentary Apollo 11. It’s not a traditional documentary in the sense that it doesn’t have a narrator. Instead, they coupled original 70mm footage with original sound from various sources. They don’t tell the story but instead let the story tell itself. As one reviewer said, “Go. Rush out. Find this film now. Find it on the biggest possible screen, accompanied by the best, loudest sound. And sit back and marvel.” I rented it on Vudu then was so amazed I luckily found it in the theaters still and went and saw the last showing locally. It’ll make you feel like you got to witness it. I’m sorry you didn’t get to back then. I wasn’t born yet so it was a gift getting to watch this. Here’s a link. www.amazon.com/Apollo-11-Todd-Douglas-Miller/dp/B07RDY2QF1

@steveameling2718

4 жыл бұрын

@Etypeman I’ll ignore your partially veiled insult. And am not going to get into an argument about it. I’ve done my own thinking. The radio signal from the lunar module was independently verified by Larry Basinger with homemade equipment. You can listen to it here. observatory.jctcfaculty.org/APOLLO11/Default.htm And that’s all I’m contributing to a discussion on this branch of the subject. Oh, and this. kzread.info/dash/bejne/qpdltdygd8uze8Y.html Cheers.

I love the whole multiple light source argument for the photo showing the backside of the astronaut being lit up, as if people disappear when they walk in the shadow of objects. COME ON

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

? Where are you going? You astronaut or talking about earth experience? You do know there is barely atmosphere on moon, right? You may think rock or sand are reflecting light but no. Just because MOON "reflects" light from darkness of space down here like a projector.... doesnt mean dark shadows can not exist, look closely at those craters.

@nickrose8733

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. In any case, the Chinese lander Rabbit, had a rover that took a picture of the lander, and the areas that are supposed to be in darkness were lit up like a Christmas tree, confirming that the moon does indeed reflect enough light to light up dark areas. What is more, NVIDIA simulated the moon dust reflecting 10-12% light and found that this would have in fact lit up Buzz in that famous picture. So we have both a computer simulation, and independent confirmation from another countries lander confirming what we saw in the Apollo pictures. Game over. Everyone needs to move on from that ridiculous argument.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

Irrefutable fact with definitive evidence : China is currently our largest goods trading partner with $559.2 billion in total (two way) goods trade during 2020. Goods exports totaled $124.5 billion; goods imports totaled $434.7 billion. The U.S. goods trade deficit with China was $310.3 billion in 2020.

@patinthechat6452

2 жыл бұрын

@@narajuna @Nick Rose: ok so I may need to clarify what I stated but I'm on the moon landing was real side. From what I understand the deniers say that we shouldn't have been able to see Buzz because he was in the shadow of the lander so there MUST have been two light sources, which I know is ridiculous. I was making the comparison to being in a shadow on Earth, people don't disappear because they are in a shadow of an object. Trust me fellas I get why he was lit up in the photo.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

@@patinthechat6452 Seem obvious to me, real it is :) Not too sure, if invisible black, but well lighted up as he was. #11 landed in flat lands, no hills nearby. Yes we know you know ridiculous, seen a lot of that with Accepters 👍

Still waiting for the Artemis Radiation Suit Data to be released.

@narajuna

7 ай бұрын

"As NASA leads the way for human exploration at the Moon and beyond, space radiation is one of the biggest hazards crews face. The investigation, called the Matroshka AstroRad Radiation Experiment (MARE), will provide valuable data on radiation levels during missions to the Moon while testing the effectiveness of the new vest. When astronauts leave Earth (orbit?), they’re exposed to the full spectrum of radiation present in deep space." - make a deal of extra 40,000 miles, Moon surface has Neutron punch also....

@narajuna

7 ай бұрын

NASA's new multibillion-dollar spacecraft successfully returned from the moon Sunday, taking the agency one step closer to getting U.S. astronauts back on the moon by 2025. December 11, 2022. >> 10 months and no: "still very safe"?

His sarcasm ("Excellent! My check came from NASA") is a wonderful touch, but I am afraid the people who most need to learn from this video are also those who don't get the sarcasm. It also made quite a contrast to the very serious words of warning he had for us all starting at 11:08, why it is so important NOT to believe the Moon hoaxers. These are my favorite words in the whole video.

@tiehocarpediem6271

7 жыл бұрын

hhahahhaa I know he kills me!

@SpectatorAlius

7 жыл бұрын

***** You have failed to follow the argument. His argument is that it is the technology to FAKE the landings on film and video that did not exist. The technology to do the landings DID exist. It is a surprising argument, but quite sound. There is another point he could have made, though, even more convincing: look at the difference between the way scifi films, even Kubrick's sci fi, faked zero gravity, and the way the astronauts really did move in zero gravity. The two are VERY different. Only the latter looks realistic. Kubrick just make it look like they were wobbling at the knees. Star Trek just gave up on zero gravity completely, inventing the convenient fiction of artificial gravity even when the Enterprise was having power failures due to being attacked.

@SpectatorAlius

7 жыл бұрын

***** He is the film maker, not you. He says based on his expertise, that that technology did not exist. If you believe otherwise, then show it to us.

@SpectatorAlius

7 жыл бұрын

***** No, that is not what I do. You are just talking nonsense in your failed attempt at a straw-man fallacy. What he says is easily _confirmed_ with a Google search. You cannot READ if you think it is refuted with a Google search. Besides: I have an even better proof that it could not be faked: the video of the Apollo 17 astronaut dropping a feather and hammer at the same time proves not only is he in a vacuum, it also proves he is in low gravity: the hammer took 2S to fall about 4 feet, which is impossible in Earth gravity.

@SpectatorAlius

7 жыл бұрын

Chris Hansen By now you must have seen the video, so where is your retraction?

This is my favorite moon hoax debunked video. It’s original and very well done. Love it.

@PayDroV

5 жыл бұрын

NASA had billions of dollars to work with at the time of making the landing on the moon look real, although they had men orbit around the earth for 8 days, they never landed on the moon, that was staged with lots of money like I said, NASA had billions of dollars to worth it, and at that time it was a RACE TO SPACE and if they couldn't make it, they faked it to beat the Russians or anyone at the time. that's what won the war!!!!!

@occhamite

5 жыл бұрын

Monosetopia cozisedso

@user-tt5js4bh2v

5 жыл бұрын

Tom Dallis: _"moon hoax debunked"_ The *APOLLO HOAX* was perpetrated by the tens of thousands of sheeple employed by various sub contractors, sponsors, commercial partners and obviously directly by NASA themselves. They were completely in the dark and to this day still, for the most part, believe in this ludicrous fairytale. Those few who were _in the know_ (including the 104 murdering nazi scum) made a final decision to increase simulation integrity levels to a point where they could pass off the film and *VIDEO* of these super expensive simulations, as reality. So really, your phrase couldn't be less accurate.

@itsMe..GaryLee

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, it proves the moon landings were absolutely faked!

@yamatocannon1

5 жыл бұрын

@shillslayer Sad to see the conspiracy theorist NPCs haven't got an update since 2005.

So... they had technology to send people to the moon, but no technology to fake a video?

@apolloskyfacer5842

Жыл бұрын

Correct. Watch the video again, and this time pay attention to what S G Collins is telling you.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

According to this bozo, he obviously way more knowledge than Bill Kaysing in rocketry and a master of scifi special effects.

@narajuna

Жыл бұрын

Have you notice non of these sheeples or shills militate against *real* Conspiracies? Only side with big Gov, Pharm, Industry, Media, rant and rave like madmen against poor mom basement Dwellers but not a peek against Giants👎 Laptop dog cowards ☹

@apolloskyfacer5842

Жыл бұрын

@@narajuna ◁==== keep in mind that this Bozo troll is a 'closet' adherent of the Flat Earth and Magical Dome Cult. It only 'outs' itself as such when the comments indicate that it's safe do do so. Go on Mr WO. Tell us all about how you believe the Earth is a flat disc. We all know you want to. 🙃

Remember: 50 years ago NASA send 12 people to moon on 7 occasion over 3 years period. Now, in 2017, they launched Artemis program and predict they need 7 years to moonlanding again. And who know if they'll succeed. I wish them best. If so, it'll be the biggest achievement in human history.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

About half a century ago there was Apollo episodes on TV, 9 trips with 6 landings series, all the Preps and sites were done, 3 more near ready to go, small budget at that point, but Nasa Studios ended the series because People were not interested. The New Scooby-Doo Movies / Moonbase 3 / The Starlost had better ratings. ps: That's it? Easier-to-do then film faking would be Our greatest achievement? What about getting rid of pesky Viruses? Peace?

@Cod4Wii

3 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 Was World War 1, World War 2, the Cold War, and the Space Race all made in NASA studios? Because all these events are all connected. If you don't believe in history, science, math, and LOGIC, than this doesn't apply to you.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

@@Cod4Wii All connected??? Dam that sound a lot like *conspiracy* talk!!! Did Nasa show footage of those? Afraid no I dont have faith in those... creatures, Logic a little, but not that a billion people involved in Apollo Project so proof 12 disciples landed on the MOON. 6 times, Group 6, recuperated by helicopher 66, 21 days of cleansing. NASA 666 Satan kzread.info/dash/bejne/apicrrmgaNqdlM4.html What is the significance of 21 days in the Bible? The Bible says that the last day of the Feast of Tabernacles is on the 21st of the *7th month,* according to the Hebrew calendar. This day was important because it also represents the end of the reign of Christ on earth that lasted 1000 years. What Does the Number 21 Mean in the Bible and Prophetically Who prayed for 21 days in the Bible? Daniel Fast - 21 Days of Prayer - 'U POWER UP.

@wildboar7473

3 жыл бұрын

After the Apollo 8 crew had read out the Genesis creation account in orbit, Aldrin's hushed-up communion on the "Moon". Aldrin had received permission from the Presbyterian church's (the spiritual home of many astronauts). The NASA logo has a Compass & a circular Snake on it; Free masons, Nazis, and magicians?? The compass is obviously the Masons[1], the Snake circle was adopted by the Nazi Ahnenerbe[2], member of the inner circle of the Thule (circle formed by a snake biting its tail) And the eye of horus?[3] Or the Eye of Ra: is a being in ancient Egyptian mythology that functions as a feminine counterpart to the sun god Ra and a violent force that subdues his enemies. Now why would a "Christian" or 'none religious' (aka none supertitious /occult) government agency get so much into roman /greek mythology? (Apollo, Gemini , Mercury, Morpheus, Artemis etc.) The first Administrator and fonder of "NASA" was Dr. T. Keith Glennan: His earlier career was as studio manager of Paramount Pictures, and Samuel Goldwyn Studios.... (member of the Chi Phi Fraternity, "Twelve Apostles", like the 12 astronauts like the 12 Olympian gods...) Freemasons in Space: The following is a short and incomplete list 1 of Brethren who have contributed to the exploration of outer space. Administration Kenneth S. Kleinknecht Manager, Apollo Program Command and Service Modules. Deputy Manager, Gemini Program. Manager, Project Mercury Fairview Lodge No. 699 Fairview, Ohio Clark C. McClelland ScO, Space Shuttle Fleet 958 - 1992 Lodge 301 Venus, Florida James Edwin Webb b. October 7, 1906 Administrator, NASA 1961-1968 University Lodge No. 408 Chapel Hill, North Carolina Astronauts Edwin E. "Buzz" Aldrin, Jr b. January 20, 1930 Gemini XII, Apollo 11 Clear Lake Lodge No. 1417 Seabrook, Texas Leroy Gordon Cooper, Jr. b. March 6, 1927 Mercury 9, "Faith 7", Gemini V Carbondale Lodge No. 82 Carbondale, Colorado Donn F. Eisele b. June 23, 1930 Apollo 7 Luthor B. Turner Lodge No. 732 Columbus Ohio John H. Glenn, Jr. b. July 18, 1921 Mercury 6, "Friendship 7" Concord Lodge No. 688 New Concord, Ohio Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom April 3, 1926 - January 27, 1967 Mercury 4 "Liberty Bell 7", Gemini 3, Apollo 1 Mitchell Lodge No. 228 Mitchell, Indiana James Irwin 1930-1991 Apollo 15 Tejon Lodge No. 104 Colorado Springs, Co Edgar D. Mitchell b. Sept. 17, 1930 Apollo 14 Artesia Lodge No. 28 Artesia, New Mexico Walter M. Schirra, Jr. b. March 12, 1923 Mercury 8 "Sigma 7", Gemini VI, Apollo 7 Canaveral Lodge No. 339 Cocoa Beach, Florida Thomas P. Stafford b. Sept. 17, 1930 Gemini VII, Gemini IX-A, Apollo 10, Apollo 18 Western Star Lodge No. 138 Weatherford, Oklahoma Paul J. Weitz b. July 25, 1932 Skylab 2, Challenger (STS-6) Lawrence Lodge No. 708 Erie, Pennsylvania Scientists Vannever Bush 1890-1974 computer pioneer and internet visionary Richard C. Maclaurin Lodge, Cambridge, Massachusetts? The story of the secret communion service only emerged after the mission. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2012/sep/13/buzz-aldrin-communion-moon?

@randyschissler5791

3 жыл бұрын

@@wildboar7473 How do you guys come up with such nonsense of the NASA logo showing an image of a snake? That's just stupid and childish really, as there is no basis whatsoever for it. I know it's easy for conspiracy theorists to just sit around and make stuff up all day long, but come on, that's ridiculous.

Loved this video. This man knows his stuff and has a black belt in sarcasm. Love it

@happystance9able

5 жыл бұрын

...but the taxes we continue to pay to NASA are real.

@deedee6799

5 жыл бұрын

@@happystance9able nasa doesn't make money they spend it.....

@nicsandee123

5 жыл бұрын

@@happystance9able So are the taxes that pay for drones trikes in Waziristan. Sure some Al Qaeda guys get it in the neck but so do women and kids...yet u have no problem with that it seems

@BarnegateBoys

5 жыл бұрын

@@happystance9able How about the billions the Military spends? I don't hear anyone complaining about that. Policing the world? And their product is death.

@nicsandee123

5 жыл бұрын

@@happystance9able Socialists...really they(Stalin and Hitler) might have said that but tinpot dictators would be more accurate. Exterminating large numbers of people is not part of socialism. Has there ever been a truly socialist country on this planet...no is the short answer. Socialism- a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. Ring any bells? I can't hear any. Socialism is a dream of the far left and will never be realized.

“I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond - the problem is that we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again.” - Don Pettit

@TheCyrix1

5 жыл бұрын

do de "Joel Harris lol do you think that the ppl will believe the bullshit that you're saying?" Why not ? Same are stupid enough to believe in talking snakes and virgin birth...

@TheCyrix1

5 жыл бұрын

shillslayer "Joel Harris guys Joel is one of many fake accounts made by a paedophile" You mean like your gurus Eric Dubay and Phuket World... why do you beleive they moved to Thailand ?....

@TheCyrix1

5 жыл бұрын

do de "Joel Harris yeah yeah crazy keep fooling yourself about the fake ball😁" Keep fooling yourself by believing your father is not also your mother's one...

@TheRisky9

5 жыл бұрын

If I were to take your modern computer and I decide to pull it apart and put in a Pentium Pro processor in it, how well do you think my efforts will work out? Not at all, because your modern computer's architecture won't support it. Not without some serious modifications that are going to be mostly trial and error. Could I build a computer with a Pentium Pro processor? To be real, I don't think I could. I could build you a superior quad core computer. That's easy! I could build you a duel core computer. Piece of cake. But I couldn't build a Pentium Pro. Why? First, I have to actually find a Pentium Pro processor that actually works. Then comes the issue of finding a motherboard that will support it. Then you have the issue of the motherboard not supporting new technology, so I would have to find a hard drive, fans, power source and RAM cards that will fit in that motherboard's sockets. I hope you don't plan on doing much with it, because those graphics and sound cards? Those aren't there either. That's not even getting into the OS system yet. Hope some Hipster has a Windows 5 disk lying around somewhere otherwise I'll have to build my own OS system from scratch! Lenux people will probably laugh in my face if I ask them... So when coming to a Pentium Pro computer, you could say we lost the technology to build one, because, well, we did. Just because we know how it was built, doesn't mean we know how to build one. The Apollo technology is even harder than a Pentium Pro computer. Because as computers upgraded, at least most of their basic architecture stayed consistent. Despite not going to the moon, technology for space travel didn't just sit still. We don't have space craft that's going to support the old Apollo computers and they don't know how to make it compatible. So it's gone. It's destroyed.

@rowdyyates4273

5 жыл бұрын

Money would not be a problem the black buget has an unlimited suppyl---they say they have put a rover on mars but why not the moon with some nice film of the area and nice film of the moon rover and landing area???

The image processing laboratory (IPL) at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory began in 1966 to retrieve and process video images from spacecraft. Software called VICAR (Video Image Communication And Retrieval) was developed to process the images on an IBM 360 computer. VICAR was written by Howard Frieden, Bob Nathan, Stan Bressler, John Campbell, Tom King and Ed Efron. This was a batch oriented system with data input from magnetic tape, command input from punched cards and output to magnetic tape. Images were displayed on a video film converter which was built by LINC.

@narajuna

2 жыл бұрын

Dam so many film experts here and not One commented? May be confused on point /side. Yes the faking could be a little easier than that doing as claimed by Science Knowers.....

@Schmidtelpunkt

2 жыл бұрын

@@narajuna Because repeating a single image several times isn't really groundbreaking technology nor does it solve the problem mentioned in the clip. Which by now even you should have understood but apparently still did not.

That's right, NASA asked Stanley Kubrick to direct the fake moon landings. Upon taking into accountvwhat needed to be done, Stanley Kubrick decided it was easier to film on location then in a studio. Plus why haven't we been back, simple, I think this quote from the Right Stuff answers it, "no bucks, no Buck Rogers."

@narajuna

9 ай бұрын

.....hardly get that, how could ANYONE know what was needed with no MOON Experience? Just nasa talk, EVERYTHING; size, distance, gravity, dustyness, is mere conjecture. Now contrary to many Excusers WE is going back, yet so many Fans keep defending the won (mountain) proven Tale despite uncoming landing.

@jsmmacdld3519

5 ай бұрын

It all fell apart because of what happened to Armstrong and Buzz what they saw and Buzz is picked up when they were having trouble with radio sir these things are huge there sitting on edge of crater whatching us there's other craft hear and why was that said picked up by experts on ham radio so they had alien ships there huge he says in excited voice and what ever else happened obviously traumatized these guys then people saying they didn't go why did Buzz say that they called it the silent 2minutes

He's absolutely right. I was nine years old and just glued to the television, but it was BORING outside of 20 minutes or so. Not much chatter, just Armstrong and Aldrin doing some bounding around. Setting up experiments is not very interesting. As a kid, the excitement was there for the achievement, but the actual business of collecting samples, setting up reflectors and all that other stuff was not exactly riveting stuff. Nice touch with the NASA check at the end... hilarious.

@khemikora

5 жыл бұрын

What you watched as a nine year old was footage taken from someone filming a screen in the NASA mission control. The feed was never direct from the moon. It was second hand film (the feed went to NASA with broadcasters filming the screen to broadcast to the public). This was to disguise the fact they were filming it in a studio. I never used to believe the conspiracy either till I grew-up, woke-up and realised it was all bullshit. They were all freemasons who were in on it. Why do you think we have never been back? We should have had moon-bases decades ago. It's incredible people still believe everything they're told.

@ninomaeputanginanis-kfp

5 жыл бұрын

@@khemikora Have you actually watched the video and seen how these theories of yours were debunked?

@lancer525

5 жыл бұрын

@felix mendez The fact is, there is no claim that has ever been made that hasn't already been debunked. Just because you're too ignorant, uneducated, and ill-informed to know that, doesn't mean it is so. Every claim ever made in the last 50+ years has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. Most of them long before you ever heard of them. Science is not magic. They landed. Six times. Q.E.D.

@lancer525

5 жыл бұрын

@felix mendez As soon as you can provide some valid, factual, independently-verifiable, documented, scientifically-accurate, legitimate, mathematically-sound evidence to back up your claim, you might be on to something. Until then, we're going to have to watch you flounder around coming up with these lame attempts at ad hominem insults. There is no claim you can make that hasn't already been debunked before you ever heard of it. I'll wait for you to come up with something, but it's a near-certainty that I've already debunked it somewhere. They landed. Six times. Deal with it.

@lancer525

5 жыл бұрын

@felix mendez If the only claim you're making is that the "technology was destroyed" then you're even more ignorant, uneducated, and ill-informed than I originally thought. You're saying that since the tooling to build B-17 bombers from 1942 was destroyed after the war, that it is impossible to build one today? Are you really that ignorant? To confirm, it is your position that obsolete, outdated, surplus, and unnecessary equipment for a program that is no longer active, should have been maintained in operational condition, just to prove to you that the program existed? Seriously? How vain and arrogant of you. Of course, I wouldn't expect you to accept any facts, since you clearly don't know that most of the documentation of the program, (over 20,000 box-feet of documents) is in the Ellenwood, Ga. National Archival Storage Facility. There are another 150,000+ box-feet of documents spread among the other National Archives Storage Facilities, and tens of millions of other ancillary pages of prints, film, memos, etc. that are in other storage archives around the country. Those are hard documents. First-level sources that outweigh, override, and completely refute any claim you might make. And if you try to say that they're fake, then you have to prove they're fake. Your say-so isn't enough. To inform you, so that you'll be less ignorant than you are, only about 3% of the documentation of the program has ever been scanned and released on the Internet. That includes the 170,000 + box-feet of documents that you didn't even know existed, because they've never been scanned for the Internet. The fact that you didn't know they exist and are stored in archives across the country, doesn't mean they don't exist. It just means that you are ignorant of their existence. For the record, a "box-foot" is the amount of documents it takes to fill up a box that is 1 foot (12 inches) deep. According to International Paper, 500 sheets of standard 8½ x 14 in (216 x 356 mm) Legal size, 75 g/m sq, sheet of paper has a measured thickness of 51.5 mm, or about 2.027 inches. Multiply 500 x 6 (because 500 sheets is roughly 2 inches, and 2 x 6 = 12) and you get 3000. Three thousand sheets of paper is roughly one box-foot. There are 60 million sheets of Apollo documentation stored at Ellenwood alone. And another 450 million sheets in storage around the country. To verify this, all you have to do is, contact the National Archives, ask if they have any Apollo documentation, and ask how you can personally see it. You can contact any one of the other Archives Storage Facilities, the Library of Congress, or similar archival institutions, and see for yourself. That would require intellectual honesty on your part, and you have demonstrated that you have none. Who knows, you might actually learn something. But since you're so sure, why don't you get the New York Times, Washington Post, or some other big newspaper to do an article on this fakery for you? I'm sure you can convince them of it. Before you do that, however... You still haven't made a legitimate claim. You've provided no evidence, no facts, no documentation, and no proof of your claim. In other words, you fail. They landed. Six times. Deal with it. Q.E.D. .

I love when conspiracy theorists say I have seen no evidence of the moonlandings but when they are shown evidence they assert it is fake based on how they feel and what they believe.

@SnowWalker1

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly!

@occhamite

5 жыл бұрын

cjfilmproductions Not only that, but they use NASA data to try to disprove NASA claims! So NASA is 100% reliable when they Moon Hoaxer thinks the data from NASA agrees with him, but 100% unreliable otherwise.

@granddukeofmecklenburg

5 жыл бұрын

It's ironic that There's more evidence for the moon landings, than most other historic events

@yabester63

5 жыл бұрын

OK, that's enough cool-aid for you!

@jamiefrangos9233

5 жыл бұрын

What evidence???

How did the camera even function in space what about the Allen radiation belt the surface of the moon would also be way to hot no stars snd what about the flag

@narajuna

4 ай бұрын

Well surprise not cowed down inhouse shill manifestation yet, well after me i think they will be triggered :) It is a mystery, All-Good Nasa magic, worst then the VABs Moon surface has been classified very dangerous radiated. Was Morning but that low Sun still hits full blast in vacuum, so quick to heat rock & metal.

@Jan_Strzelecki

4 ай бұрын

@@narajuna In other words, you don't understand it, therefore it's fake. Got it.

@narajuna

4 ай бұрын

@@Jan_Strzelecki ....rather *embarrassing* 🥴 again ignoring the master comments full of content and good english.... just addressing (2 Years!) Me!? You kind of been ranting that for a while, nothing new, but you had to specify here again..... o well thanks again for showing off your *J* mattering understanding, impressive I may say. 😯

@marksprague1280

4 ай бұрын

Yawn. The usual ignorant drivel from a scientifically-illiterate conspiracy nut.

@narajuna

4 ай бұрын

@@marksprague1280 you been yawning for some time (years) now, with so very original knowledge.... well this fine HOMOsapien cared enough bout Nuts to create /sell this 'pretty sure' long rant. And even went more scientifically-literate with Nut Jarrah White,

If you want more photographic proof we landed on the moon consider what you do not see. - The "flapping flag" is often cited as evidence of a hoax because there's no air, hence no breeze, on the moon. - If a breeze caused the flag to flap that would mean the landing was filmed outdoors; there's no wind in a studio. - So, if there was a breeze strong enough to flap the flag why don't we see any blowing dust? Or anything else blowing at the same time the flag flapped? - What if a bee or other insect flew across the scene? Or a spider climbed on the LEM? The people who edited the film might have seen it and edited it out but they could have missed it. After 50 years no hoaxer saw it? - What if a small animal poked his head up for a frame or 2? Again, an editor could have missed it but 1000 hoaxers studying these films for 50 years wouldn't have. To say the least, this is unbelievably unlikely.

@therealzilch

3 жыл бұрын

You're forgetting that NASA's technology was at least 50 years ahead of what we know. Or maybe they had access to alien technology. Or demons. Or something. Anything, but that the Earth is a globe and NASA landed on the Moon, because that's what the Government says, and whatever the Government says is wrong. Or something.

@narajuna

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah we want dust blowing in wind (all we are...), moon stuff is super dry as the atmosphere.... heard Spacewinds rounded the rocks off. I see a mouse run around the moon videos.

@nicsandee123

3 жыл бұрын

The body of the mouse in the SpaceX video is clearly dwarfed by its enormous ears, leading to only one conclusion, it’s a long eared mouse. The problem here is that the long eared mouse is brown whereas as the so-called space mouse is most definitely dark gray. Perhaps more baffling is that if the video in question is said to be CGI, so why would the mouse be there in the first place? A prank maybe, but then the ‘footage’ would have to be viewed over and over by its creator to find any errors. Then you have the rotoscoping, another person involved. And then the big boss man in charge of the ‘faking department’ would have to approve its release. I’m pretty sure the prankster would be rumbled at this point. The likely response from the boss would be, “How are we expected to sell this if there’s a frikkin mouse in there?” And then there’s the problem with the artists, after the prank they would need to be placed under surveillance surely? NASA must be running low on nondescript blue sedans at this point? Of course they could be ‘train crossinged’ but then you would need to hire new artists, more headaches, more blue sedans. Round and round we go......,

@lance3748

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicsandee123 . Ha ha. You're all funny, but guess what, if you take 10 seconds to think about it you'd know I'm not wrong. And smart people only need 2 seconds not 10.

@therealzilch

3 жыл бұрын

@@nicsandee123 I suspect the mouse is there for the same reason that NASA admitted that the Earth is flat in all those flight manuals: Satan made them do it, so that anyone who still believed in the Moon landings even so would have had a chance to see the truth, but rejected it, and thus rendered his soul forfeit. The Devil is very cunning.