Talk starts at 7:25

@greycharles6607

5 жыл бұрын

Heribert Mannigfalt god bless you

@edmatthews2974

3 жыл бұрын

Lectures like this are so needed like the swami years ago at the United Nations for many consecutive years offering a calm center for politicians world wide immediately comes to mind - so this public science presentation takes psychology neuroscience and philosophy and experience of the transcendent into the vanguard of the marketplace and public discourse - There are very few multi dimensional thinkers lecturing - we used to call them metaphysicians ( Dr. Philip McShane calls them meta-metaphysicians ) So this talk was a wonderful example of theory and practice coming together thank you so very much for the presentation

@h9production

3 жыл бұрын

@@edmatthews2974 did u mentioned Swami Vivekanand?

@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices

2 жыл бұрын

@@greycharles6607, to WHICH god are you referring?

@SpiritualPsychotherapyServices

2 жыл бұрын

@@h9production 🐟 02. A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF “LIFE”: Everything, both perceptible and imperceptible - that is, any gross or subtle OBJECT within the material universe which can ever be perceived with the cognitive faculties, plus the SUBJECT (the observer of all phenomena) - is to what most persons generally refer when they use the term “God”, since they usually conceive of the Primeval Creator as being the Perfect Person, and “God” (capitalized) is a personal epithet of the Unconditioned Absolute. However, this anthropomorphized conception of The Absolute is a fictional character of divers mythologies. According to most every enlightened sage in the history of this planet, Ultimate Reality is, far more logically, Absolutely NOTHING, or conversely, Absolutely EVERYTHING - otherwise called “The Tao”, “The Great Spirit”, “Brahman”, “Pure Consciousness”, “Eternal Awareness”, “Independent Existence”, “The Ground of All Being”, “Uncaused Nature”, “The Undifferentiated Substratum of Reality”, “The Unified Field”, et cetera - yet, as alluded to above, inaccurately referred to as a personal deity by the masses (e.g. “God”, “Allah”, “Yahweh”, “Bhagavan”, etc.). In other words, rather than the Supreme Truth being a separate, Blissful, Supra-Conscious Being (The Godhead Himself or The Goddess), Ultimate Reality is Eternal-Existence Limitless-Awareness Unconditional-Peace ITSELF. That which can be perceived, can not be perceiving! Because the Unmanifested Absolute is infinite creative potentiality, “it” actualizes as EVERYTHING, in the form of ephemeral, cyclical universes. In the case of our particular universe, we reside in a cosmos consisting of space-time, matter and energy, without, of course, neglecting the most fundamental dimension of existence (i.e. conscious awareness - although, “it” is, being the subject, by literal definition, non-existent). Just as a knife cannot cut itself, nor the mind comprehend itself, nor the eyes see themselves, The Absolute cannot know Itself (or at least objectively EXPERIENCE Itself), and so, has manifested this phenomenal universe within Itself for the purpose of experiencing Itself, particularly through the lives of self-aware beings, such as we sophisticated humans. Therefore, this world of duality is really just a play of consciousness within Consciousness, in the same way that a dream is a person's sleeping narrative set within the life-story of an “awakened” individual. APPARENTLY, this phenomenal universe was created with the primal event (the so-called “Big Bang”), which started, supposedly, as a minute, slightly uneven ball of light, which in turn, was instigated, ultimately, by Extra-Temporal Supra-Consciousness. From that first deed, every motion or action that has ever occurred has been a direct (though, almost exclusively, an indirect) result of it. Just as all the extant energy in the universe was once contained within the inchoate singularity, Infinite Consciousness was NECESSARILY present at the beginning of the universe, and is in no way an epiphenomenon of a neural network. Discrete consciousness, on the other hand, is entirely dependent on the neurological faculty of individual animals (the more highly-evolved the species, the greater its cognitive abilities). “Sarvam khalvidam brahma” (a Sanskrit maxim from the “Chandogya Upanishad”, meaning “all this is indeed Brahman” or “everything is the Universal Self alone”). There is NAUGHT but Eternal Being, Conscious Awareness, Causeless Peace - and you are, quintessentially, that! This “Theory of Everything” can be more succinctly expressed by the mathematical equation: E=A͚ (Everything equates to Infinite Awareness). HUMANS are essentially this Eternally-Aware-Peace, acting through an extraordinarily-complex biological organism, comprised of the eight rudimentary elements - pseudo-ego (the assumed sense of self), intellect, mind, solids, liquids, gases, heat (fire), and ether (three-dimensional space). When one peers into a mirror, one doesn't normally mistake the reflected image to be one's real self, yet that is how we humans conventionally view our ever-mutating form. We are, rather, in a fundamental sense, that which witnesses all transitory appearances. Everything which can be presently perceived, both tangible and immaterial, including we human beings, is a culmination of that primary manifestation. That is the most accurate and rational explanation for “karma” - everything was preordained from the initial spark, and every action since has unfolded as it was predestined in ETERNITY, via an ever-forward-moving trajectory. The notion of retributive (“tit-for-tat”) karma is just that - an unverified notion. Likewise, the idea of a distinct, reincarnating “soul” or “spirit” is largely a fallacious belief. Whatever state in which we currently find ourselves, is the result of two factors - our genetic make-up at conception and our present-life conditioning (which may include mutating genetic code). Every choice ever made by every human and non-human animal was determined by those two factors ALONE. Therefore, free-will is purely illusory, despite what most believe. Chapter 11 insightfully demonstrates this truism. As a consequence of residing within this dualistic universe, we experience a lifelong series of fluctuating, transient pleasures and pains, which can take the form of physical, emotional, and/or financial pleasure or pain. Surprisingly to most, suffering and pain are NOT synonymous. Suffering is due to a false sense of personal agency - the belief that one is a separate, independent author of one’s thoughts, emotions, and deeds, and that, likewise, other persons are autonomous agents, with complete volition to act, think, and feel as they wish. Another way of stating the same concept is as follows: suffering is due to the intellect being unwilling to accept life as it manifests moment by moment. There are five SYMPTOMS of suffering, all of which are psychological in nature: 1. Guilt 2. Blame 3. Pride 4. Anxiety 5. Regrets about the past and expectations for the future These types of suffering are the result of not properly understanding what was explained above - that life is a series of happenings and NOT caused by the individual living beings. No living creature, including Homo sapiens, has personal free-will. There is only the Universal, Divine Will at play, acting through every body, to which William Shakespeare famously alluded when he scribed “All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players.” The human organism is essentially a biopsychological machine, comprised of the five gross material elements (which can be perceived with the five senses) and the three subtle material elements (the three levels of cognition, which consist of abstract thought objects), listed above. The ANTIDOTE to all mental anguish is to firstly discern pain from suffering, then to achieve complete relief from that miserable state of existence, by abandoning the erroneous belief in personal authorship, and abiding in the primordial sense of being (the unqualified “I am”, which is one's core identity). This is the very same peace which is experienced each night during the dreamless phase of the sleep cycle. This 'resting imperturbably as Flawless Awareness' can be practiced on a regular basis, until it is fully assimilated and integrated into one's life. Every person, from time immemorial, has been either intentionally or unwittingly seeking such causeless peace, most commonly by practicing one of the four systems of YOGA (religion) delineated in the sixteenth chapter of this work, or else in creating wealth and the acquisition of material possessions, or in psycho-physical pleasures. That peace of mind is often referred to as “happiness”, “joy”, or “love”, and often presumed to be a temporal state, since many assume, incorrectly, that continuous peace is unavailable in this life. Fortunately, that is not the case - it is eminently possible to live one's life acquainted with unbroken peace of mind, if destined. Following DHARMA (frameworks of authentic religion and societal duties) is not guaranteed to achieve that desired tranquillity of mind, but even so, it is beneficial for individuals, since it establishes a structure which enables one to more easily elevate oneself beyond the mundane, animalistic platform (i.e. the base pursuits of eating, sleeping and mating). Intrinsic to dharma is the division of the adult male population into the four classes of society and the inherent role of girls and women in society, as fully elucidated in latter chapters of this Holy Scripture. Cont...

“If quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet. Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” - Niels Bohr, a Danish Physicist

@JamesHawkeYouTube

4 жыл бұрын

that's because it IS nonsense.

@suniliyengar8653

4 жыл бұрын

KENOPANISHAD - yasyamatam tasya matam matam yasya na veda sah; avijnatam vijanatam vijnatam avijanatam. To whomsoever it is unknown, to him it is known. To whomsoever it is known, he does not know. It is unknown to those who know it and known to those who do not know.

@7thAct

4 жыл бұрын

@@suniliyengar8653 Awesome. It is because word "known" injects thoughts and ego, it then disentangles from the field/source. Absolute silence, stillness or love cannot be put in language.

@di3486

4 жыл бұрын

Niels Bohr is legend

@MrCTruck

4 жыл бұрын

Fundamentally its un-understandable. It's magic essentially. I think it always will be. There's still so much out there.

7:20 - just putting this timestamp here for easier access each time i watch/listen to it the next time ☺️🤓

@d.r8892

3 жыл бұрын

thank god, I dont care where this people studied as long they have a valid theory

I dropped from a MS program top most US university after booking tickets to US partly due to inner call, went on to study at a top indian university where similar stuff was core part of curriculum. I made it core of my values, but belief in these values (money and success is not everything , altruism till infinity is the one thing to live for) was always swayed during tougher times. Heartening to see likes of stanford atleast partly considering these values and ideals..

@goertzpsychiatry9340

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYOL1pSfcqyXhqw.html

@shakazulu301

3 жыл бұрын

Hero

@chriscurry2496

3 ай бұрын

I am currently on pause in my MS program at a too US university for very similar reasons. I would not associate “spirituality” with my reasons however-I would just say that I came to the realization that students are not graded on knowledge, ability, or effort-they are graded on how well they do what they’re told. In retrospect this makes perfect sense, because they are expected to work in corporate institutions, which of course value workers who excel at successfully completing sometimes complex tasks without questioning the value of that work on society as a whole. Good students and employees are expected not to ask “why?” but to ask “how high?” when the professor or the boss tells them to jump.

"Anybody old enough to remember that book?" Right there with you, brother.

Useful descriptions of meditation, samadhi and enlightenment. Thanks John!

@jeejeekaivei9139

2 жыл бұрын

The guy in the beginning was hot 😂😜

I love this guy... I've known about TM for quite a few years, but I only discovered John Hagelin's lectures over the past few days, and I am very impressed with his lucidity, energy, and fundamental knowledge of both reality and the-self (one and the same from a certain point of view).

@jeejeekaivei9139

2 жыл бұрын

The guy in the beginning was hot...😜

this talk itself is simply transcending. Thank you so much for that, John Hagelin.

the idea that consciousness exists at the smallest, most fundamental, reduced level of physics is quite an assumption. It is just as likely to be an emergent property only visible at the systems level, i.e. a property the comes from the connections between parts of the brain. For instance, you wouldn't say Microsoft Word truly 'exists' at the level of a computer's hardware, since it appears the same whether on a mac or pc, but that it emerges from computer code as a higher level, abstract idea.

@evetsnitram8866

6 жыл бұрын

Interesting analogy. Microsoft Word is really a computer program. Programs or apps are a manipulation of computer assembly language, even the operating system is an elaborate program. Anyway, without programs a computer is sort of in suspended animation awaiting instruction. Its said that consciousness brings everything into being including us. I find it interesting that we are microscopic specs on another microscopic spec called Earth and we are actually aware of where we are and some contemplate it in scientific detail.

@manuelbevand6366

6 жыл бұрын

Posted pretty much the exact same comment as you except your analogy is better :)

I believe that when we die, only the perspective dies but not the consciousness, that is permanent in this universe until its death.

Thank you for an almost poetic lecture...piecing everything thing together: physics, neuroscience, and consciousness.

@asadchoudhrya

2 жыл бұрын

he did no such thing

This is the one of the Best lectures I have attended..

@goertzpsychiatry9340

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYOL1pSfcqyXhqw.html

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

@@goertzpsychiatry9340 So you're familiar with the research on samadhi and TM that has been published: * [Transcendental experiences during meditation practice.](citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1025.8976&rep=rep1&type=pdf) Studies on pure consciousness, AKA "_samadhi_" during TM: * [Breath Suspension During the Transcendental Meditation Technique](sci-hub.do/10.1097/00006842-198205000-00001) [safari may not read this one properly, but the rest work just fine, and other browsers work with all links -4/1/2021] * [Electrophysiologic characteristics of respiratory suspension periods occurring during the practice of the Transcendental Meditation Program.](sci-hub.do/10.1097/00006842-198405000-00008) * [Metabolic rate, respiratory exchange ratio, and apneas during meditation.](sci-hub.do/10.1152/ajpregu.1989.256.3.R632) * [Autonomic patterns during respiratory suspensions: possible markers of Transcendental Consciousness.](sci-hub.do/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02414.x) * [Autonomic and EEG patterns distinguish transcending from other experiences during Transcendental Meditation practice.](sci-hub.do/10.1016/s0167-8760%2801%2900143-x)

i find it quite amazing that scientist who are studying consciousness have come to the conclusion that the mind is a powerful tool and has a major effect on reality around us just as the spiritual world has always known. scientist have no where else to go when they realize that human observation has an effect on experiments. you have people sitting next to machines that average at 0, but when you put a human next to it and tell them to use their mind to change the outcome, it has a a huge impact on that outcome. with no human next to it it will average out indefinitley, the graphs dont lie. human consciousness is powerful. science teahces us that reality as we see it is just an illusion. were in fact finding out that our senses have mislead us. upon closer inspection we realize that reality isnt what we thought it was, and its so much more amazing than we could have ever thought.

@birricforcella5459

7 жыл бұрын

You got anything to support that claim? Where and when did that happen?

@Goettel

7 жыл бұрын

Woo woo.

@Youtubehandle9000

6 жыл бұрын

Nobody has....

@liamc1102

4 жыл бұрын

I agree with you.

@patbaptiste9510

3 жыл бұрын

I've been trying relay the message but most folks chose to reject it...too bad for them

One of the best lectures I have seen on youtube.

Dr.John Hagelin is truly a remarkable speaker and educator.

@goertzpsychiatry9340

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYOL1pSfcqyXhqw.html

I have read Bhagwat Geeta and Shrimad Bhagwat Puran and I can observe that many things that are discussed in this video are already described in this Vedic Literatures. I recommend all to read them.

@siddarthshah1773

Жыл бұрын

yes shiva is the dark matter and shakti is dark energy.. shiva is pure consciousness.. he dance of subatomic particle is the dance of shiva.. bubble chamber experiment has proved that.. CERN is now opening black hole in lab by using shivas nataraja dance.. shivling is in the centre of our galaxy and all the galaxy are in the form of golden triangle which is what our temples made of.. nd OM is the sound of universe as well as of sun

@harresmessi8078

11 ай бұрын

And what about worshipping cows? Is there anything in quantum physic about that.

@Khushi-jk8ud

9 ай бұрын

@@harresmessi8078 it's gratitude towards them.

Thank you Stanford for producing this video. Comfort seems to be the main focus of your project. The universe is still evolving and so are humans. It is not wise to assume we are an intelligent species before we reach that goal. Someday when we realize that we live on a perfect planet, we will then realize that we are still in the early stages of evolution. The main tool in reaching enlightenment is in the phrase "Do no harm" It helps you realize that our genetic reflexes are driven by a survival of the fittest mechanism. If creativity is important to you, try stepping out evolution by doing no harm to anything for a day.

@jackboswell9035

7 жыл бұрын

Bullshit plain bullshit? no extrapolated bullshit. Religion under another name.

an amazing enlightening video and i must say requires a wise man to understand it too, not every one can understand it

@goertzpsychiatry9340

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYOL1pSfcqyXhqw.html

What is the spacing between strings in 3-D space?

Im not sure the video title matches the content.

@bobbyt9431

3 жыл бұрын

SQRT:-1

@AJDOLDCHANNELARCHIVE

3 жыл бұрын

@Biggest Natural Muscle Glad we have someone as intellectually advanced as you to tell this man who has a PHD in quantum physics from Harvard that "it's bollocks".

@AJDOLDCHANNELARCHIVE

3 жыл бұрын

@KelliAnn Winkler Let's just say that when I see John Hagelin, and I see "Biggest Natural Muscle" and hear how they both speak and interact with other human-beings, it's pretty self-evident to me which is the more intelligent of the two, and who I would listen to over the other on this subject.

Love is the quantum particle that every conscious being is.

@peterturley1331

4 жыл бұрын

Pity it is not shown in everyday 'life'!

@mathematicalninja2756

4 жыл бұрын

Peter Turley some decoherence it is

@roye6961

4 жыл бұрын

@@peterturley1331 times change my friend, global peace and unity is inevitable

@manusartifex3185

4 жыл бұрын

Are you deepak chopra ?

@joehinojosa8314

3 жыл бұрын

Love Created. It can't help but to create. It's Evil twin,hate DESTROYS

Surely we can go beyond 'Dark Energy' by now. Let's give Vera Rubin some respect and look into what this quantum field is that holds so much unknown mass within the Galaxy.

Very Interesting. I've also been toying with the idea of taking the Free MIT physics courses available.

@larrylyons9362

8 жыл бұрын

+Brandon Payne Yes! Please do.

@larrylyons9362

8 жыл бұрын

Thanks for drawing my attention to the courses, Brandon .

@toddboothbee1361

6 жыл бұрын

yes, MIT teaches the uses and metaphysics of astrology and tarot card reading.

@goertzpsychiatry9340

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYOL1pSfcqyXhqw.html

@Bpaynes

3 жыл бұрын

@@goertzpsychiatry9340 interesting concept, thank you

Any concepts or ideas about Synesthesia actually being a basic level of perceiving in Samadhi ?

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

It's the exact opposite: Samadhi is the process where perception of internal (mental/emotional) and external (sensory) objects reduces or completely ceases, even as the brain remains alert. The most common form is samadhi is simply the process called TM, while the final stage is simply the [occasional] endpoint of TM: *Samadhi with an object of attention takes the form of gross mental activity, then subtle mental activity, bliss and the state of amness.* -Yoga Sutras I.17 Should the process complete itself, than all mental activity [apparently] ceases: *The other state, samadhi without object of attention, follows the repeated experience of cessation, though latent impressions [samskaras] remain.* THe process of TM is one of increasing inhibition of the thalamic activity that allows the brain to be aware of anything at all, even though the brain remains in an alert mode. Should that inhibition become full, not only does awareness cease, but as a side-effect, another part of the thalamus that helps regulate autonomic functioning also abruptly changes in its activity, so that heart rate and respiration also abruptly go lower. Some people even appear to stop breathing during the awareness-cessation state, and then equally abruptly, all such autonomic functions return to normal meditation levels at the same time that awareness-of activity in the thalamus resumes. This apparent breath suspension guided the earliest research on the state as it is impossible to miss (legend holds that the first lab tech who was present for such a state panicked and actually climbed on top of the meditator, attempting to perform CPR - their reaction when the meditator calmly opened their eyes and demanding to know what the lab tech thought he was doing, apparently almost resulted in another form of autonomic disruption in the lab tech, though he survived): * [Breath Suspension During the Transcendental Meditation Technique](sci-hub.do/10.1097/00006842-198205000-00001) * [Electrophysiologic characteristics of respiratory suspension periods occurring during the practice of the Transcendental Meditation Program.](sci-hub.do/10.1097/00006842-198405000-00008) * [Metabolic rate, respiratory exchange ratio, and apneas during meditation.](sci-hub.do/10.1152/ajpregu.1989.256.3.R632) * [Autonomic patterns during respiratory suspensions: possible markers of Transcendental Consciousness.](sci-hub.do/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02414.x) * [Autonomic and EEG patterns distinguish transcending from other experiences during Transcendental Meditation practice.](sci-hub.do/10.1016/s0167-8760%2801%2900143-x)

From the most finite and simplest particle found in the Quantum level of existence, to the most complex in the material world, a state of/level of consciousness can be observed. Consciousness being " an ability of awareness and observation of the surroundings to form a reaction within the bounds of state of being in the material world and perhaps the non-material world each with it's own distinct limitations.

Amazing lecture !

Nice, anapanasanti and vipasana meditation changes lives. Thank you

From Dr. Max Planck, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist who discovered quantum theory: "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness."-The Observer (25 January 1931)

@frialsharefabdo7715

2 жыл бұрын

Truth ....thank you 💚

@jeffreebailey4464

Жыл бұрын

Profound

@thillaisivapandian4304

Жыл бұрын

Insightful presentation...Very true..Persons who meditate will understand the truth...👍💚

what's the link with quantum physics bro

@AJDOLDCHANNELARCHIVE

3 жыл бұрын

The link is that this guy has a PHD in quantum physics from Harvard.. he is talking about a grand unified field to replace general relatively etc...

@rikkerthindriks3478

3 жыл бұрын

@@AJDOLDCHANNELARCHIVE He doesn't become very concrete though.

@AJDOLDCHANNELARCHIVE

3 жыл бұрын

@Vorname Nachname KZread deleted my reply because of the link I assume. Are you so lazy as to be unable to type "John Hagelin" into Google? Look at his about page on hagelin.org

@AJDOLDCHANNELARCHIVE

3 жыл бұрын

@Vorname Nachname More sad to see someone with such a closed mind as yourself. John Hagelin is pioneering whole new fields of research into the fundamental nature of reality, matter, consciousness, and the Universe. How about you?

Very well worded and expressed talk if we all "United" at once on anything it would be done in simple direct ease. (is actually the solution to all as well: we all think "system is broken" well all STOP at once, well, "system" would be done, ready for a Peacefull world restart/revolution) - after watching this video I realize why my life has been so blessed. . I lived in this state my whole life OTHER than when way too much trauma "broke" it for me - this video pieces together the hows and whys in such way I can in hindsight recognize and doubly thankful for the "challenges" that made me ever in my life reach forward - never know "boredom" - and have such an innate acceptance/love of all things, world included - and I never consciously realized what it was I was experiencing (as I do my best to Remove "labels" from my life. I have lived and called myself "Timeless" for years, it all makes OH so much more sense now,

This was a great talk. I never understood what "enlightenment" was, but now I kinda get it. Thank you.

Consciousness is associated with “Thinking” and is independent of “Thinking”. This thought is understood only by Consciousness.

@nickolasgaspar9660

3 жыл бұрын

Consciousness is not a processing agent. It's just a mental ability biological brains have to direct their attention and reflect on stimuli. Being aware of stimuli of our environment and our self is an essential trait for survival and we'll being. No need to introduce magic in this basic biological ability.

@mike-0451

2 жыл бұрын

@@nickolasgaspar9660 I don’t think that’s what he’s saying. “magic” is not a violation of science so much as it is a violation of we know, which is to say that magic is simply something we can’t explain. I don’t think what you call “magic” is even possible to imagine. A man pulling a rabbit out of a hat is not a violation of the laws of the universe. You understand that you *shouldn’t* be able to pull a rabbit out of a hat, but there is still a rabbit, and there is still a hat. If he were to pull a E̷͔̩̳̱̦̣̟͋͝l̴͎̯̳̞̤̟̮͘ͅd̶͔͖̫̥̥̖͐̊͒̐̄̉͗͆̉ŗ̵̛̠̜͙̟̻̥̮͊̋̽̌̈́͆͑ï̴̢̢̞̫̠͜͜͠͠t̵͎̔̈́͌̋͒c̸̡̢̨̝̣̹̬̞̮̫͛h̷̨̫̆́̀͗̅ ̵̩̈́́̑́͊̈̔̊͜͠ȁ̸̡̻̻̙̯̤̼͈̠̆̌͛b̶̻͇̣̱̮̼̔̑͊̃͛͒͌̍̑̕ͅó̸̪͎̲̖m̷̹̞̞̜̺̻̜̑̋̽̈́́ĩ̵̛͉̫͇̱͍̣̍̀̎ń̷͉̈́a̵̤̖̲̗͉̝͑͗͘t̴̨͚̱̝̱̝̻̜̠̄͆̕͠ǐ̶̘̹̑̔̔̈́͗͋̈́̒͝ò̷̡̹̙̲͈̜͎̩̋̚ǹ̴̝͇̙͍͙̠̤̰̊̑̑̀͊ ̷̎͋̅͋͜ Then that would certainly be magic, because such a thing literally is not decribable. You couldn’t even give it a name except “unknown”. There is no pedestal or foundation you can look back to to understand it. But what we actually call “magic” occurs within the laws of the universe. For example, reversing gravity may not be what we expect, but we are still simply dealing with gravity, and now it is simply reversed. Knowing this, you can simply assume that everything will now fall upwards. See, the structure of reality is the same. Now, assuming that there is nothing beyond the chemical reactions is to forsake even calling consciousness a “biological ability”. “Ability” itself is an abstract concept. Where does the equation to describe the meaning of “ability” exist? It doesn’t make any logical sense to deny the transcendent itself. You may disagree on religion, but the transcendent doesn’t just go away because you don’t believe it. In the same way, you may make a semantic argument that air is not material. In the same way that you define consciousness as a “biological ability”, I may say that air is simply an illusion of the primate brain that requires a consistent mold to fit its own pattern into, therefore, everything that we think we know does not actually exist (or some nonsense like that, could’ve worded it better but this is KZread) however, throw this man off a cliff and let him feel the air against his face, and then he will say “you were right”.

@nickolasgaspar9660

2 жыл бұрын

@@mike-0451 -" “magic” is not a violation of science so much as it is a violation of we know, which is to say that magic is simply something we can’t explain. " -Sure, its only a violation of reason or epistemically dishonest. "Magic did it"(magical entity/substance as a causal agent) is a intellectually lazy way to pretend we understand the ontology of a phenomenon. So as you said , making up magical substances doesn't really explain anything. "Consciousness" in this presentation frame is nothing more than what Phlogiston or Miasma or Orgone energy were for our epistemology....made up artifacts that conveniently happen to "channel" the properties displayed by the observable phenomenon. So this magical approach ( attributing the properties of process/phenomenon to invisible enties/substances) is in direct conflict with the current scientific paradigm which states that Advances properties( chemical, molecular, biological etc) are the emergent properties of complex structures of matter....NOT fundamental properties in addition to matter. -"I don’t think what you call “magic” is even possible to imagine. A man pulling a rabbit out of a hat is not a violation of the laws of the universe. You understand that you shouldn’t be able to pull a rabbit out of a hat, but there is still a rabbit, and there is still a hat. -I think I explained extensively the "magic" in the QM perspective on consciousness. QM deals with fundamental elements of matter and their kinetic properties. IN order to observe more advanced properties(as I said above) you will need to look in larger structures of matter(molecules, biological systems etc). -"Now, assuming that there is nothing beyond the chemical reactions is to forsake even calling consciousness a “biological ability”. -I am not sure you understand the current establish scientific paradigm(product of the last 2000years) or the science behind Mind properties and brain states. I don't have to "assume" anything (or nothing) beyond the observable mechanisms of the brain. First of all ...its not my burden. I am not the one making claims about an invisible ontology. Second....and most importantly, in science we don't assume nothing about an invisible ontology, but we offer descriptions on observable causal mechanisms. What we do is establish Strong Correlations between a phenomenon and a Necessary and Sufficient Causal Mechanism. -"“Ability” itself is an abstract concept. Where does the equation to describe the meaning of “ability” exist? "" -Sure....how is this comment is relevant to the unscientific speculation of this lecture? -"It doesn’t make any logical sense to deny the transcendent itself." -Actually, there is a Logical rule called Null Hypothesis that specifically demands the rejection of all existential claims until evidence can falsify our initial rejection! The Null Hypothesis is how we identify a Default Position and keeps us from holding many conflicting positions OR using special pleading to justify our bias toward a specific one! Again, the burden is on the side making the extraordinary claim.I just reject unfounded claims. By rejecting a claim, that doesn't mean that I believe the claim is wrong. ("I don't accept X "DOESN'T mean " I think X i s wrong"). -"You may disagree on religion, but the transcendent doesn’t just go away because you don’t believe it" -Again what we believe or not is irrelevant to its actual state. We don't even know if it is even possible! We don't have a way to evaluate it, so the only thing we can do is look at the evidence and see whether they provide any justification to believe in it. There is no evidence, so the belief in the transcendent is irrational (not wrong). You are just promoting an irrational belief and a bigger mystery as answer to a smaller one (mind properties). -"In the same way, you may make a semantic argument that air is not material." -That would be ignorant. Air is really low density matter. -"In the same way that you define consciousness as a “biological ability”," -Its not my definition. Science defines all phenomena as "abilities" that matter has to produce advanced properties as the complexity of structures of matter rises. The same is true for hardness, liquidity, wetness,digestion, mitosis, combustion....why should we make up a magical substance for consciousness when we have can directly observe a necessary and sufficient mechanism? -" I may say that air is simply an illusion of the primate brain that requires a consistent mold to fit its own pattern into, " -good luck making something useful with that vague statement. At least our scientific understanding provides us with an accurate description of what we observe , testable predictions and technical applications! -"everything that we think we know does not actually exist (or some nonsense like that, could’ve worded it better but this is KZread) however, throw this man off a cliff and let him feel the air against his face, and then he will say “you were right”." -that sentence doesn't really make any sense. All that we know is through our interactions with what "exists"...and we can use a fan and use technical apparatus to analyze the particles that are pushed by its blades..... What is your point???

@mike-0451

2 жыл бұрын

@@nickolasgaspar9660 I tried to philosophize with you but apparently I missed. It’s a shame your English teachers didn’t train you to think in that way.

@nickolasgaspar9660

2 жыл бұрын

@@mike-0451 when your Philosophy is disconnected from our epistemology then you are just pseudo philosophizing. Philosophy is the intellectual effort of coming up with wise claims in order to expand our understanding of the world. In order for a claim to be wise, it needs to be based on knowledge. You can not say that you are philosophizing without knowing what is science and which framework is in agreement with facts. Aristotle knew that 2000+ ago. Again , we don't see neuroscientists giving talks on which quantum Interpretation , on of 10+, is the correct one. Why physicists think that they can address a biological phenomenon without studying the work and taking in to account the observations and current Epistemology of the field!!!!?

What's is your achievements as student, material aspect and spirituval aspect.

Brilliant! Stanford has done well to open it's doors to consideration of deeper values.

@goertzpsychiatry9340

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYOL1pSfcqyXhqw.html

Unbelievable all the negative comments below, you obviously don't know anything about the systems of eastern philosophy (phenomenological description of consciousness). And are so limited to an exclusive view from a western physics perspective. Hagelin is the ONLY Serious Field Theorist who knows its ancient philosophy, east and west will synthesize in the unified theory, the conceptual ontological framework of ancient scriptures is helpful. They talk about the same thing but using different words and ways of describing.

@jeremymacdonald5584

8 жыл бұрын

+Juri van de Ven people get very offended when you imply that materialistic science is incomplete. They result to defense and negativity pretty fast

@theultimatereductionist7592

7 жыл бұрын

And you and easterners get so offended at materialistic science & atheism & atheists for having a different perspective than yours. You have conjure all sorts of FEARMONGERING & HYSTERIA about some NONEXISTENT MYTHICAL "oppression" by reductionists & materialists that you conjure of STRAW MEN of materialists & reductionists "silencing" all your eastern conjecturing. Eastern philosophy is NOT proof. It is just SOMEBODY'S OPINION. Got that concept?

@jesusissupreme1921

5 жыл бұрын

REDUCTIONIST. dude...you need to go back to school. It is westerners abrahmic church who persecuted those who had different views..Galileo and others are examples....even went on war and killed millions for different views....the reason why scientists regard religions as enemy of science...is because of this western exclusivity constructs..the atheists are looked upon the majority western abrahmic soceity... Whereas the easterners always celebrated different viewpoints...can you provide even one instance where we persecuted a scientist or anyone with different perspective?? Even the pure atheists like Charvakas were held in high esteem... you will not find atheists looked down upon in eastern society....so dtop the crap...

@owencampbell4947

3 жыл бұрын

Any thoughts of your own? just group building through education. Keep on spreading the words and thoughts of others, never having a second to think about a clean mind of your own? meditation, indoctrination, linguistic memorizing, brainwashing to my way. How can there ever be a true understanding if you dont even understand you're not you. You think you are thinking on your own, but all your thoughts are put in to you with loops of repetitions to always the conducted direction. Have you discovered something on your own away from learned stuff? using your senses to feed the brain that configurates the information and projects it to your conscious realization? like a new point of view of your own, without any interference and interaction of influenced material? why do a white man think white, a black man think black, a brown man think brown, and so on?

@nickolasgaspar9660

3 жыл бұрын

because we know the systems of eastern pseudo philosophy....

What's next? Deepak Chopra gives a guest lecture at Stanford?

@tommytamtomo9377

3 жыл бұрын

you are a myopic person!

@BlastinRope

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, this speaker is a harvard phd, what a quack!

@Lalakis

3 жыл бұрын

@@BlastinRope Humanity is desperate for new religions and cults. Let's throw some quantum in there just to make it sound scientific.

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

Actually, CHorpa was quoting Hagelin. Hagelin constantly tried to correct Chopra but it never worked and eventually CHopra set out on his own.

May I know the reference of 5 elements linked with 5 types of spins??

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

That's from Ayurveda...

This should have a different title such as "Meditation, and its benefits".

@jrice135

3 жыл бұрын

Better yet "Meditation: dubious benefits and outright deficits". Meditation temporarily blocks pain receptors; meanwhile pain transmitters remain active. Zombying out on analgesic endorphins is not a prescription for healing.

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

@@jrice135 Actually, TM doesn't do that; that's the effect from mindfulness (which is the exact opposite of TM). Instead, TM reduces stress *reactivity* to pain. One still feels the pain, but it isn't as overwhelming, allowing one to continue to be rational while still appreciating that you are injured.

thanks, sir for presenting Indian ancient yogic culture in a glorious way....

@siddarthshah1773

Жыл бұрын

its shiva who is papa or tau of physics

Great talk! Thank you!

I was under the impression that Buddhist called Samara "suffering" because "desire" exist in this state. What is "desire" if not a yearning for something other than what's present in this moment? What is an unquenchable thirst for "more" but suffering or a state of dissatisfaction?

This is an excellent lecture. He isvery talented in explaining the concepts. Very interesting.

@goertzpsychiatry9340

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hYOL1pSfcqyXhqw.html

27:35 - Wait. I imagine it would be possible to express quantum mechanics without using complex numbers - you'd just use a pair of real numbers in a suitable way. I'm guessing complex numbers just "work in a way" that makes the expression simpler and cleaner (i.e., some things you'd have to manually specify without them becomes "automatic.")

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

The rules of arithmetic of these pairs would simply be identical to that for complex numbers. That's actually how it is implemented in computer languages that have a complex number data type. E.G., in Squeak Smalltalk, the "*" symbol for the class Complex is: * anObject "Answer the result of multiplying the receiver by aNumber." | a b c d newReal newImaginary | anObject isComplex ifTrue: [a := self real. b := self imaginary. c := anObject real. d := anObject imaginary. newReal := (a * c) - (b * d). newImaginary := (a * d) + (b * c). ^ Complex real: newReal imaginary: newImaginary] ifFalse: [^ anObject adaptToComplex: self andSend: #*]

Understanding quantum physics is Understanding ONESELF, i.e., PURE or ABSOLUTE CONSCIOUSNESS. This understanding cannot come from research into the physical (phenomenal) world. It is more an internal journey. One has to turn inwards. It involves a great deal of saadhana (practice). Here is one sample Mantra from Kenopanishad (II:3): "यस्यामतं तस्य मतं मतं यस्य न वेद सः। अविज्ञातं विजानतां विज्ञातमविजानताम्॥ (yasyaamatam tasya matam, matam yasya na veda sah; avijnaatam vijaanataam, vijnaatamavijaanataam). "It is known to him to whom It is unknown; he, to whom It is known, does not know It. It is unknown to those who know, and known to those who know not." That is why Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is also known as the EQUATION OF MAYA.

@jar-jarbinks1777

4 жыл бұрын

i agree 100% with you

@joehinojosa8314

3 жыл бұрын

Gate,gate,para gate,para Sam gate,bodhi swayha, Omani Pad Mayhum.......

This is exactly what Nisargadatta Maharaj teached, with his direct approach and realization

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

Except that it likely was not. Certainly, there's no published research on people in samadhi from this approach.

so this would mean that our consciousness exists in a timeless place that never ends, the release of DMT on death would force the consciousness to go into "the fourth" dimension, it actually makes sense having taken LSD and experienced timelessness and an affinity with everything in the universe and beyond, im going to try these techniques and hopefully find that amazing place once again.

@MrSush8683

4 жыл бұрын

Don't take too much of it your nervous system will be damaged forever ..

@1Hol1Tiger

2 жыл бұрын

Uhh the brain doesn't produce enough DMT to trip off of

I've been on ritalin since I was in second grade and if I had simoty I wouldn't have been so hyper I couldn't read other's minds after the drug was administered .I was so bombarded by other minds it was hard to sit still having a nightmare of everyone else's thoughts I past experiences of others thought a form of remote view it's now a factor of being able to recall their experiences.

Enjoyed the beginning of the video but then I started getting this weird feeling that this guy is a salesman or paid social marketer. The red flag came up when we were shown the graphs with claims about the branded "TM" instead of the more generic "Deep Meditation". Follow the money on this guy. Shame on Stanford.

Thanks for the video.

how about the state under anesthesia or state under drug influence?

home of one of my favs; leonard susskind

@davarph

9 жыл бұрын

Who also believes in the unified field...Strong force, weak force, eletromagnetic and gravity, all unified!

@davarph

9 жыл бұрын

***** It's called M theory. Many different looks at the same type of underlying "force". I wish I knew the math....

The archaic influence of Aristotelian logic pervades the comments of this video. So many seem absolutely sure about what the world "is."

Based on a lot of the comments it is clear that we wold have to do one thing to start: Define "consciousness"... I think we can easily see even a single cell is intelligent, it "reads" or perceives the environment, interacts with it, and learns from it. But what does "consciousness" mean? Have to start with the basics :-)

@davidkincade7161

8 жыл бұрын

I tend to agree with you but unfortunately there are a lot of disagreements as to what the term means, there is tons of "baggage" surrounding "consciousness", we need a generally accepted definition. Sadly there is not one and I sometimes think these guys are part of the problem because a lot of TMers think they know the truth just cause Maharishi told them. If you want agreement you need to interface with with the rest of the world, not go off in your own direction and claim special knowledge, especially about something like a definition. So interesting how "attached" some are to their ideas given the idea of "non-attachment"... LOL

@rservajean

2 жыл бұрын

A system is conscious if there is something it is like to be the system, for the system (meaning: from the first person point of view). And we have no clue of how the brain gives rise to conscious experience (synonyms: first-person experience, subjective experience, phenomenal experience). It seems that we can perfectly describe the brain from the third-person point of view, so have a complete physical and functional account for the brain and still gain no insight on what is called the "hard problem of consciousness", namely explaining conscious experience. Why everything is not just "in the dark" instead (sort of speak) ?

@davidkincade7161

2 жыл бұрын

@@rservajean conscious system definition again? Seems a bit obtuse. Next- not sure a brain is needed for many of the attributers U listed. Finally- we have a perfect description of the brain??? Not. We may know more about the structure, than how it works- but thats all kinda beside the point- full understanding would make sense of both as they are intertwined.

Am searching in this subject can as one help me :") any one can suggest any books/ resources

Pls correct the errors in the text- Mr Hagelin is saying 'Samadhi' and the text reads 'sumati'... and so on - many Sanskrit words are misspelled.

Hagelin believes that his extended version of unified field theory is identified with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's "unified field of consciousness", a view that is rejected by "virtually every theoretical physicist in the world"

@KipIngram

4 жыл бұрын

The scientific community just isn't ready to come to grips with our minds yet. You even have people like Daniel Dennett that completely deny there is such a thing - he claims it's all an illusion. I can't help noticing, though, he doesn't say what it is that's experiencing that illusion.

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

Sure, but that's because there is no measurable evidence that he is right. The internal appreciation f reality that emerges is just what hagelin describes, however, so even though it is merely a brain state, it is still a very *interesting* brain state [As part of the studies on enlightenment and samadhi via TM](www.reddit.com/r/transcendental/comments/7djr03/a_bunch_of_research_on_tm_pure_consciousness_and/), researchers found 17 subjects (average meditation, etc experience 18,000 hours) who were reporting at least having a pure sense-of-self continuously for at least a year, and asked them to "describe yourself" ([see table 3 of psychological correlates study](sci-hub.do/10.1016/j.concog.2004.03.001)), and these were some of the responses: * _We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies . . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this physical environment_ * _It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around here and there_ * _I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . and these are my Self_ * _I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I see, feel and think_ * _When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me_ .: Tradition holds that when that state fully matures, one is able to directly decide what reality is, and so siddhis, such as perfected levitation, are manifest. However, unless and until one can "sit in the air" simply be deciding to do that, you are correct that no-one will take the more controversial claims about the state seriously.

@brad1368

2 жыл бұрын

@@KipIngram...he means your brain is akin to an advanced carbon based computer, with network loops that cause us to have the "illusion" of consciousness. It makes more sense than mysticism. Just because we can't completely understand it scientifically doesn't mean it's magic in the supernatural sense. Humans are very bad at judging complex systems using common sense. Just because you don't believe it doesn't mean it isn't a perfectly logical theory.

What a brilliant lecture, I’ve enjoyed every bit of it. Extra points for addressing “The Secret” fever. Where can I find more lectures by this brilliant educator?

@Skeletor611

4 ай бұрын

In KZread

fascinating! :::)

@QMPhilosophe

9 жыл бұрын

Fascinating only in the sense that a major university would invite this charlatan to speak.

@kayshah64688

2 жыл бұрын

@@QMPhilosophe Unfortunately you still don’t get it. Please take the time to further explore. Nameste

great talk, very important to understand how to combat stress through meditation.

Such a perfect example of quantum and mathematics woo with vastly confusing and confused language.

7:43 starting

All the narrow minds attacking the content of this video are deathly afraid of having their simplistic world view destroyed by those who accept higher thought.

@toddboothbee1361

6 жыл бұрын

I've rarely found people refuting or "attacking" another "scientific" world view because it was threatening, but because they found it unconvincing. This pertains whether the view is later shown to be accurate or lunacy.

@evetsnitram8866

6 жыл бұрын

Some people are so caught up in constantly thinking that the thought of not thinking in meditation is akin to being dead.

@toddboothbee1361

6 жыл бұрын

I'm sure this is true. Some people probably are. I still doubt that most scientists I know, many of whom do meditate and have done so for many years, refute this fellow for the reason you stated. Death itself isn't something that frightens them, either, though they don't believe in life after death. Something about meditation seems to have allowed them, in part, to cease suffering such personal fixations as the fear of death. I am, though, not like these fellows and from time-to-time have a sleepless night over the not just my eventual death, but the already actualized deaths of some of my family and friends.

@Youtubehandle9000

6 жыл бұрын

Yes i am terrified of people who make wild claims without evidence yes you are right

@lewisdazzara1531

6 жыл бұрын

Daitaigenjitsu B

I thought it was Higgs-Boson field that gave particles mass. Hes saying its super-string. What gives?

Absolutely beautiful

If you don't get what this is about try and educate yourselves a little because this is quite profound and more people need to have the intelect to obsorb this message .. I for one appreciate the content especially that everything you view and see is made of things that can't be seen as real ( so that rite there is massive )

this is so similar to five daily prayers , but the vital difference is during namaz its a rule to keep your eyes open and try to focus your gratitude towards your creator , be thankful and and the same time humbled by the greatness and helplessness of human beings.... woo... this realization while typing this , made me realize why prayers calm my anxiety and stress.. embracing yourself and your reality keeps you sane . one might win some or loose some during ones lifetime... yet its a fulfilling feeling .. the constant struggle becomes beautiful and bearable ones your inner core is calm and connected to your reality , that knowledge that its not just the body but a supreme soul within it , a soul which is on a journey .... I am simply mesmerized , a kind of motivation to constantly keep my memory flourishing thorough this practice , which in my case is( 5 daily prayers ) so the light which i guess is the soul can stay unpolluted , until its time for it to return .. THANK YOU for sharing this .. it helped me not to give up on my prayers .. cause thts my way of breathing ....

What if holes are eruption s in space time?

amazing video thank you for uploading it,

Consciousness is not on-off type it is something between. Everything is consciousness in some level otherwise life would never appear.

@HazardousHumorHQ

8 ай бұрын

"...otherwise life would never appear" huh?

I spent 30 minutes listening to this guy and my suspicion got stronger and stronger then I read the comments and then I stopped. Nothing wrong with what he wants to promote but felt cheated by the title.

Thank you. Food for ones thoughts.

1. Consciousness is holding the same place in the universe what it holds in a dream. 2. A dream,Including every body living in the dream is observed by consciousness which is not a part of the dream. 3. The universe, including every body living in the universe is also observed by consciousness which is not a part of the universe.

@brad1368

2 жыл бұрын

Pretty words that have no actual meaning.

Good info!!!

Ernesto Lara is right. And endless worlds emerge as we play self-similar layers and layers of hide-and-seek with Love. We are beautiful, boundless beings of Light and Love, ‘children playing on the seashores of endless worlds.’ - Deep Synergy + Tagore

it is amazing how something discovered thousand of years ago and only today scientists are realizing it and understand what reality is.

Nice talk, I am pretty sure John has been touched by Buddhist - like ideas, I am not saying thats a bad thing at all, so have I been actually. More and more scientists ( particularly physicists ) seem to be heading in this same direction.

From his Wikipedia article: John Samuel Hagelin (born June 9, 1954) is the leader of the Transcendental Meditation (TM) movement in the United States. He is president of the Maharishi University of Management (MUM) in Fairfield, Iowa, and honorary chair of its board of trustees. The university was established in 1973 by the TM movement's founder, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, to deliver a "consciousness-based education". Hagelin graduated in physics in 1981, and began post-doctoral research at the CERN for less than a year, then at the SLAC. He vanished in 1983 in the midst of personal problems and reappeared a year later as physics professor at the Maharishi University of Management (MUM), then became its president. Hagelin believes that his extended version of unified field theory is identified with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's "𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙡𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙘𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨", 𝙖 𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 "𝙫𝙞𝙧𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙡 𝙥𝙝𝙮𝙨𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙩 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙".

@alxmtncstudio2066

Жыл бұрын

I'm impressed and shocked this lecture is still online under the name of Stanford in 2023. It's questioning the integrity of this prestigious school.

Those bubbles, in my experience and in my own words, would represent emerging potentials of an intention or a thought, until you decide to evolve it and expand on it to bring to manifestation, it is not random. Each one of us is God, universal consciousness.

@aqouby

7 жыл бұрын

You win the stupid award.

@justappearances

7 жыл бұрын

very well established point :p

It’s always interesting when scientists get all in-depth on the effects of non-physical concepts. But I wonder if this type of subject matter serves those who think it’s mumbo jumbo. I love science but find myself critiquing certain concepts because I think a lot of the answers we all hold within as is

This is supposed to be Stanford. How did these people even get into the building?

At 22:35 he begins talking about that the human counsciousness is structured in layers, and that this is unknown in western psychological science. Then he basically talks, in my opinion, about the consciousness and the subconsciousness, which is since Sigmund Freud a basic of western psychological science.

@QMPhilosophe

9 жыл бұрын

Face it, this guy knows a little about physics, a little about psychology and neuroscience, and he mashes it all together with a lot of words that sound technical and learned. But in the end, this is all just nonsense.

@LawsonEnglish

9 жыл бұрын

Freud certainly talked about such things, but no research ever verified Freud's theories.

@brad1368

2 жыл бұрын

It's easy to sound enlightened when you don't have to worry about evidence or be subjected to peer review. I'm sure a lot of people back in the day talked about how enlightened and genius the charlatans were that sold snake oil and whatever else people wanted to hear.

Why doesnt this have millions of views?!

@Lalakis

3 жыл бұрын

Because it is a trash talk ?

Closed this one when he started his first sentence with the word "so".

So much hate here the this must question that the physical brain is consciousness. If so, this will be an interesting presentation. Namaste and care, mhikl

Nice Explanation..... :) :) :) Users who plan to watch this video, please don't go by any comments mentioned, as it is purely their experience of watching the video. Please watch yourselves to gain the knowledge and understanding of this video.

@lordjavathe3rd

9 жыл бұрын

Sundar Oblan Don't search for information on google, the answers you'll find on there are only useful to the individuals who suggested them. Everyone's experience in life is different, no matter if it's the length of time it takes to cook chicken or the personal notion of what constitutes lying.

MIT-WPU Where you at?

@rujulwalvekar3301

3 жыл бұрын

Lollll

@riddhiktilawat1270

3 жыл бұрын

@@rujulwalvekar3301 answers?

@rujulwalvekar3301

3 жыл бұрын

@@riddhiktilawat1270 Comments madhun

@yashchanne817

3 жыл бұрын

Aye

@yashchanne817

3 жыл бұрын

@@rujulwalvekar3301 Milale astil tr plz send here

So many people not understanding. Sad to see that by so many the pinal gland got shut off, Turing them in a zombie, not being open for unknown information. In these times all people need to have alteast one psychedelic experience where they have seen the unified field before you die. Or you just wait in ignorance to dead to fall back in the unified ocian of conciousness Alteast I know I'm the collective soul existing forever.

All mediators are seeking the connection of the Platonist?

I wondered why in tm we were supposed to recite sanskrit as though they were magical words. If we want to chant in the most ancient existing language, older than Sanskrit, that should be Basque.

Gold and platinum are thought to be the product of neutron star collisions.

Thanks Universe for bringing me here!

You re sure this is stanford?? Does not look like a scientific talk to me...

@beenaplumber8379

4 жыл бұрын

There is absolutely no scientific content in this talk, not even an attempt to connect quantum physics to consciousnss.

@mrreyes5004

3 жыл бұрын

@@beenaplumber8379 Nope ;) Dr. Robert Lanza (revolutionary biologist) and his associates, Bob Berman and Matej Pasvic (verified physicist and theoretical physicist) have written three books on their theory of "Biocentrism" - in short, the concept that it is consciousness and life that structure our universe, _not_ the other way around. I know it sounds like rubbish at first, but it is all based on actual, legitimate quantum physics and biology and not the crap in movies or sci-fi novels. It's immensely interesting stuff, enjoy.

@beenaplumber8379

3 жыл бұрын

@@mrreyes5004 I did not say there were no qualified scientists talking. My comment was that what was presented in this video was not scientific content. That means something specific. Technically, that means that this video does not present a falsifiable account of evidence to support a properly formulated hypothesis. In practical terms, that means they give little else than their word as authorities. Appealing to authority ("because someone smart said so") is an unreliable way to learn things about the universe, and it is completely outside the scope of science. Sadly, many qualified scientists choose to pursue other enterprises and present their qualifications as scientists as the basis for things they present to the public. I.e., I am a retired neuroscientist. I could start a business selling quack medical products and tell people they should buy them because I, a qualified neuroscientist, say that they will reduce pain. I might even believe that they work, but unless I have followed the scientific method, my authority as a neuroscientist is meaningless. All I have offered is my word, not evidence or citations to evidence I refer to. That is an example of non-scientific content, and it is unreliable. What's worse is that, when qualified scientists do this, as many have, they do so knowing that they can easily mislead many people. Theoretical science is just a bit different though, and in physics, theorists often operate apart from experimentalists. They still follow the scientific method, but the only work product of a theoretical physicist is a good idea (or many brilliant ideas - think of Einstein), either a theory or a hypothesis. Theoretical work does not yield knowledge. It yields a good idea that needs to be tested. Einstein's theories still had to be tested experimentally before they were accepted as consensus in the scientific community. Einstein got a few things wrong too remember. His word was not enough to make something scientifically reliable.

Leonard Susskind... Begging you to tell me if this is worth listening to or not... Thanks.

Consciousness = Electricity ergo we are "Children of Light"...

@sonnycorbi6406

8 жыл бұрын

+Harry Sharma, You give credence to ambiguity Harry - Consciousness utilizes light to manifest form, (words are not things but descriptions of things and subject to connotation at best, hence for lack of better words) :-) - (see my post above to David Kincade, two posts up)

@KipIngram

4 жыл бұрын

Additionally, electromagnetic forces (light) hold every molecule in your body together. So, we are, literally, held together by light.

@iambeing3305

4 жыл бұрын

@@KipIngram your body emits physical light. Look it up

@LawsonEnglish

2 жыл бұрын

@@iambeing3305 But *less* so when you are meditating. Look it up.

Very interesting!! I I suggest to anyone who may be interested,the modern spiritual classic I AM THAT , talks by Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj.

The title of this is misleading even though the material is accurate and enlightening. It rarely touches on quantum physics.

There is a little 'sleight of hand ' in this presentation in that superstring theory is mathematical conjecture and unprovable. As is, I imagine, the idea that consciousness is somehow to be found at the level of vacuum energy. If you're here and do not know of Penrose and Hammeroff, then I would recommend them for a less contentious start.

situation making sense gravitational fields

This vid came up in auto-play, I first half-listened to the introducer who gave a strangely incoherent introduction, then did anyone else notice the huge red flag from the 'Astrophysicist' main speaker regarding the 'ice-world of Neptune' with a pic showing a missized Pluto? Why did he even start talking about planets in this talk? Presumably to establish some kind of 'Astrophysicist' credibility? :D Then I checked the comments after seeing that and realised I better not waste any more time listening to the rest of this talk haha

Brilliant .