German tank in WW2 -> must be a Tiger More than one tank in frame in Ukraine -> must be a tank battle

@kommutron2443

Жыл бұрын

-> must also be destroyed

@kreol1q1q

Жыл бұрын

Watch the russians call anything remotely tank shaped a "Leopard 2"

@ulfenburg7539

Жыл бұрын

@@kreol1q1q brother already happening with the amx 10s and what not.

@williambrasky3891

Жыл бұрын

I don’t get why you thought this was warranted here? They made a pretty decent case here, and they even explicitly communicated this was to be understood as speculators.

@cbhlde

Жыл бұрын

@@kreol1q1q😁😅

People are so obsessed over tank battles and label anything as them

@gusramos3620

Жыл бұрын

They want to see ShitThunder battles in real life

@saucyinnit8799

Жыл бұрын

​@@gusramos3620 Commander: "YESS, A HIT!" Meanwhile: Machine gun turns yellow

@eklhaft4531

Жыл бұрын

@@saucyinnit8799 Sometimes they say "It seems we missed" after target is destroyed 🤯

@MrMr-ws3tv

Жыл бұрын

I read in the WW2 battle in Kursk tank's that ran out ammunition rammed into other tanks. That sounds crazy

@saladdressing2781

Жыл бұрын

@@saucyinnit8799 its more impressive that the penetration managed to give the machine gunner jaundice

2:10 That's an awesome camera angle.

@alphanomad511

Жыл бұрын

Commander periscope

@edwardcardozo8325

Жыл бұрын

Gamer moment

@eotorpex2694

Жыл бұрын

BfV moment

As TheEpicCowboy said before I could: WW2 - Every enemy tank is a Tiger Gulf War - Every enemy tank is a T-72 Invasion of Ukraine - More than one tank in a frame? Must be a tank duel.

@Mygg_Jeager

Жыл бұрын

MOST Iraqi tanks in the Gulf War were T-72s, as the vast majority of T-60-Whatevers and T-55's were wiped out in the DECADE long Iran- Iraq War that immediately preceeded it.

@rogue__agent5884

Жыл бұрын

@@Mygg_Jeagernu uh

@rafail2303

Жыл бұрын

Making a logical jump every tank in Ukraine is a Leopard 2

@Mygg_Jeager

Жыл бұрын

@@rogue__agent5884 What's your source. Cause the wreckage left in the wake of the "Sadam Line" was pretty self evident. It's a common Ruskie cope to pretend "If SaDdAm AcTuAlLy HaD T-72's ThE UsA wOuLd HaVe LoSt." And lol, no. Turret Tossers go FWOOOOOSH. A10's go BRRRRRRT.

@Mygg_Jeager

Жыл бұрын

@@DrunkbearZ And your source for that is? :P

This is the first time ive ever seen on video the expansion of the "jet" created by this sort of anti tank roud and I had NO IDEA how "large" it actually got. Its a miracle the crew survive these rounds, when they penetrate that is.

@meskalin64

Жыл бұрын

Its not a heat round its an EFP.

@lutherburgsvik6849

Жыл бұрын

@@meskalin64 sorry, what's EFP?

@meskalin64

Жыл бұрын

@@lutherburgsvik6849 Its kinda like heat. EFP= Explosivly formed penetrator.

@bradenhagen7977

Жыл бұрын

EFPs is just ied heat.

@lutherburgsvik6849

Жыл бұрын

@@meskalin64 right. Cheers.

given the footage at 2:10 sows a commander sticking his phone into the vision port, this was clearly not done in the heat of the action. This could possibly mean that there *was* previously a tank duel, and the commander is recording them finishing off the already disabled tank because, well who wouldn't want to record that, but yeh its far from definite.

@user-ew2xh5ij1y

Жыл бұрын

A reasonable thought. And if you were shown the end of the battle, then you would see that the next shell in the enemy tank explodes ammunition. But the idea, I repeat, is reasonable.

I love how RedEffects sees two pixels and really be like hm yes must be a T64

@michaelswagson4457

Жыл бұрын

T64BV Obr.2022 V2.3

@towarzyszbeagle6866

Жыл бұрын

He's judging T-64 or T-72 based off of reverse speed. Which is a fair assessment. Both those tanks have a single reverse gear and basically go backwards at a walking pace.

@agentusm7871

Жыл бұрын

you can see there's line on back, which is 5TD diesel engine that T-64 uses

@Darth_Barnaby

Жыл бұрын

@@towarzyszbeagle6866 yeah i know, but he's just generally good at identifying tanks from just a few pixels

@nanab256

Жыл бұрын

@@towarzyszbeagle6866 every tank can go slow, they doesn't play on keyboard using arrows to control, they have proportional controllers

This guy looks at 240p video and tells the exact tank model and which side it belongs to..amazing

@gerfand

Жыл бұрын

240p is easy what about 144p?

@kieffer9705

Жыл бұрын

​@@gerfand He can still identify it check his previous videos

@gerfand

Жыл бұрын

@@kieffer9705 that is the joke

@uthopia27

Жыл бұрын

​@@gerfand use magnifying 🔍 duhhh

@ZafrielDante

Жыл бұрын

actual video is 1080 but for defence measure its convert to 180

I strongly suspect, based on the smoke in the treeline, that the weapon in question was a recoilless rifle.

@phunkracy

Жыл бұрын

Could be an EFP anti tank mine.

@jugganaut33

Жыл бұрын

@@phunkracy whatever it is. You don’t want to be a tanker in this war.

Thank you as always, for your non biased videos. Nothing but pure information

@TheStaniG

Жыл бұрын

Sure isnt Denys or LazerPig thats for sure...

@slavcity406

Жыл бұрын

@@TheStaniG ^^

@bonda_racing3579

Жыл бұрын

They’re pro Ukrainian so they have a bias. Same with kremlin bots. It’s war of information

@Harro99

Жыл бұрын

I actually used to like Lazerpig's takes on various subjects. But his Ukraine videos are incredibly soy inducing.

@sindrome303

Жыл бұрын

🤣

The original hit could have started the fire which spread to the ammo causing the conflagration, a tank does not always brew up the moment it is hit!

@edwardrichtofen611

Жыл бұрын

That could be, but then the crew would have jumped out. But the driver was cleary not harmed, since he drove around, after the hit.

@SonaNerikov

Жыл бұрын

It's possible that the round hit the turret ring and ignited the auto loader magazine, where most of the ammunition is stored, detonating it.

@edwardrichtofen611

Жыл бұрын

@@SonaNerikov You really think the crew would have drove on after witnessing it?

@VompoVompatti

Жыл бұрын

@@edwardrichtofen611 It is possible that the turret crew was out of action after the hit but the only the people present know what actually happened.

@SonaNerikov

Жыл бұрын

@@edwardrichtofen611 you're right because they're dead already

Did that cope cage actually work somehow?

@poes1314

Жыл бұрын

No

@rogue__agent5884

Жыл бұрын

Yes

@poes1314

Жыл бұрын

@@rogue__agent5884 no

@bluefordpickup

Жыл бұрын

No

@mrhonkhonk6116

Жыл бұрын

@@poes1314 yes

People desperately want to see a modern tank battle. So i don't blame them for labeling everything a tank battle, even if it is annoying

@daddyrabbit835

Жыл бұрын

I don't... it's disgusting. No one seems to take into account that every time one of those tanks is hit, men are getting burned alive. I'm a Gulf War Veteran (3rd Armored Divison) and this war is heartbreaking to watch.

@_omniZ_

Жыл бұрын

​@@daddyrabbit835 🤓☝️

@CatWithAOpinion

Жыл бұрын

@@_omniZ_ dude don't disrespect veterans, they've been through more shit than you

@ikmalrashad4122

Жыл бұрын

@@CatWithAOpinion based Dan Vaught virgin omniZ

@froschreiniger2639

Жыл бұрын

@@daddyrabbit835 Doesnt that only apply to those with the carousel autoloader?

The most logical answer to the puffs of smoke at around 1:23 could be sabots from another UKR tank more to the left. Considering the seen UKR tanks distance to the treeline and the fact that sabots fly about 100-200m meters before hitting the ground it would be a likely position for a third tank of the platoon. (EDIT: Also the fact that the puffs of dirt appear slightly at different times matches APFSDS sabots landing.)

@NocKme

Жыл бұрын

yeah people on reddit were saying that there is a video where you can see that there was a third ukr tank that is not visible in this video.

@crforfreedom7407

Жыл бұрын

There's no doubt in my mind the 'puffs' around troop positions were Javelins. I saw this SAME SCENARIO play out a year ago. This is the exact same tree-line tactic that drove RU out of the center of UA. I saw this exact same scenario play out a year ago. RU seems to have learned NOTHING about the new modern battlefield.

@orue5499

Жыл бұрын

Looked like it couldve been shrapnel landing after the detonation

@JABelms

Жыл бұрын

​@@crforfreedom7407 That tank crew panicked as soon as the first rocket hit the cage and they tried to seek out cover in the forest. Nowhere to hide in an open battlefield against conventional weapons.

@crforfreedom7407

Жыл бұрын

@@JABelms Exactly. They were screwed the minute they opened the throttle. Why RU hasn't figured out that armor can't advance without artillery or rocket support just is mind-blowing to me. The UAF has no fear, no concern over simply standing up in an open field and firing a shoulder AT rocket. Madness.

One of the smartest and forward thinking decisions regarding the KF 51 Panther was adding an additional crew member as a drone operator, situational awareness is the biggest weakness of any tank, they could have properly scanned that tree line with a drone with thermal camera before even advancing into range of any potential hidden infantry with AT weapons then take them out from stand-off distance with the main gun, I guess another tank crew will have to learn that lesson for them

@Welterino

Жыл бұрын

Imagine when they make the drone capable to send target info back to the tank so the gun can automatically aim at the target trough the foliages without even actually seeing it, that will be some next level shenanigans right there.

@zemog1025

Жыл бұрын

Check out the Chieftan's take on a tank with a drone operator.

@Rake3577

Жыл бұрын

@@zemog1025 a link would be much appreciated señor

@user-tv7fg7wt2d

Жыл бұрын

@@Rake3577 TL;DR They didn't mean that drones and those fancy equipment are silly and shouldn't be in the modern battlefield. They meant that the drone and dedicated drone operator being integrated with / inside the tank is silly. The drone and operator can just be in an other vehicle, like a troop transport vehicle instead of unnecessarily taking up an unnecessary amount of valuable internal volume. (anyways) I will save you the time. Basically, Nicholas and Bernhard thought that the drone and dedicated operator is completely silly and shouldn't be in the tank. They said something along the lines of "Get the nerd out of the tank. I want space for extra ammunition and other necessities."

@Rake3577

Жыл бұрын

@@user-tv7fg7wt2d might as well get rid of drones, maps, GPS and IFF on the squad level, extra ammo and water are more important

still crazy that tanks are within a few hundred meters of each other. Really unprecedented compared to Desert Storm.

@iMost067

Жыл бұрын

hills and tree lines tend to do that.

@falcon6329

Жыл бұрын

wonder how usa would have handled in the same scenario

@maka6134

Жыл бұрын

@@falcon6329 probably obliterated the tanks with hellfire missiles from a drone and then committed a bunch of war crimes by dropping napalm all over the tree line killing any squirrel foolish enough to cross the Americans path

@panterka.f

Жыл бұрын

​​@@falcon6329 likely the same as Russia. Very limited air support, due to insane amounts of stingers and the like, back echelons full of AA. No side can get clear air superiority in a traditional sense, since then both are limited to using guided bombs, radar missiles and fucking unguided missiles, last one turns jet into a fucking grad system...Very high insurgency capabilities, here americans would have an advantage, since they look more distinct, and ukrainians are basicaly russians speaking on a slightly different dialect. Russian army is plagued in bureaucracy, thats their main weakness atm.

@oldfartgaming148

Жыл бұрын

@@panterka.f "Russian army is plagued in bureaucracy, thats their main weakness atm." very true, exactly why wagner has been so effective.

Thank you for your analysis

Hmmm that was a fast notification

Consider this alternative scenario. The weapon hitting the russian tank is an 'nlaw' or similar, and penetrates the tank. We can't see the inside of the tank so it looks unphased but is infact burning on the inside. Finally it ignites and blows up from the first hit. The 'smoke puffs' are debrie being flung of the exploding tank at high speeds, maybe only small peices of metal.

@Volodymyr_SVD

Жыл бұрын

No, because we see that it is maneuvering just fine and follow #1 RU tank. It's quite strange to continue driving tans while you are burning alive.

@Swoiny

Жыл бұрын

My first thought was NLAW

@mrshambler23

Жыл бұрын

@@Volodymyr_SVD Perhaps, Ofc I may be wrong. However, I have seen several videos from the Ukraine war when tanks are hit and only explode after a while. Regarding the driver, I imagine that the drivers compartment is not set on fire right away; it may be several seconds or so before that happens. Also a dead or injured driver may cause the tank to keep driving with the weight of feet/hands. I found a video showing another RU tank being hit with an NLAW. It keeps driving for a bit although 2 crew members can be seen escaping. The tank then starts to 'cook' after a minute or so. kzread.info/dash/bejne/e5qGxc-DhKTVpbA.html

@brandonlevy8680

Жыл бұрын

@@mrshambler23 the tank turned after the first rocket attack. so the driver was not dead.

@Volodymyr_SVD

Жыл бұрын

@@mrshambler23 "it is maneuvering just fine and follow #1 RU tank." After hit tank is MANEUVERING which shows that driver is fine and doing it's job. And nope. There isn't enough space inside tank to ignore any sign of fire. Don't forget that ammo storage in RU tanks is situated under the turret so if fire manage to burn down till that ammo it means that at least two crew members were sitting right in it's epicenter. So first blow didn't do a shit to it. RU crews (which is correct to do) are living tanks after any medium damage. There is no point to lost entire crew to do a one or two additional shots. There are plenty of tanks in storage so it is better for skilled crew to leave damaged tanks and return to base for new one.

So the "cope cage" worked?

@alphanomad511

Жыл бұрын

Not the second time, unfortunately

@dragonace119

Жыл бұрын

Doubt it, probably from a direct attack AT missile aimed too high. The Cope cages we do see have gaps that wouldn't even stop a javelin or NLAW or at least not enough to stop it from going through the roof.

@102ndsmirnov7

Жыл бұрын

@@dragonace119 aren't they made to deflect grenades dropped from drones primarily?

@NocKme

Жыл бұрын

not realy. It was not top down attack. If there were no cage projectile would have missed.

@al1sa920

Жыл бұрын

He did a video on cope cages. If executed correctly, they do work against vertical attacking ATGMs. Both russian and ukrainian tanks are covered in cages, because it works against cumulative jets. Fun fact: cerosine bottles also perform very good at dispersing cumulative jets, Israelis use that in their tanks

The cope cage actually worked 💀

@bluefordpickup

Жыл бұрын

No it didn't.

@littleface7060

Жыл бұрын

@@bluefordpickup just because it got destroyed in the end, doesn't mean it didn't work...

@YourSocialistAutomaton

Жыл бұрын

​@@bluefordpickup it stopped the artillery, so yes it did. 😅

cool, logical, detailed breakdown of vid. nice work, keep it up!

A short and a video sweet as!

Yeah... I knew you'd over this video so I was looking forward to your commentary.

Those small puffs of smoke / dirt could also have been impacts of sabot petals. Might have been a tank off to the left of the screen that fired an APFSDS round at the tank through that gap in the trees.

It actually got hit by an offscreen tank, because in no frame can you see a missile or projectile prior to impact. With a 30 fps video the projectile has to easily go 1000 m/s or more, which only a tank can

@psbs1

Жыл бұрын

a heat round can

@orue5499

Жыл бұрын

Came in from the left for sure, whatever it was. Could've been AT weaponry that doesnt have an active rocket throughout its entire flight, or a HEAT projectile, or APFSDS. Im no expert, at all, but the black smoke makes me consider it to be a chemical penetrator of some sort, obviously hit high

@crforfreedom7407

Жыл бұрын

@@orue5499 I think the 1st round was a HEAT round from that UA tank. But that didn't knock the tank out. It survived that hit. The 'puffs' at the tree-line from troops I'd bet every penny I have that they were Javelins or some such anti-AT rocket. They killed the tank. The RU tank survived the 1st hit. I've seen this same UAF tactic of hitting RU armor from tree lines for a year now. Why ANY RU armor is advancing ANYWHERE without rocket/artillery support just blows my mind.

@SnafuWT

Жыл бұрын

@@psbs1 yeah heat rounds that TANKS use. only the long barrel cannons of a tank can accelerate a HEATFS projectile close to 1000m/s

@DerDrecksack87

Жыл бұрын

Who would fire HEAT at an ERA covered russian tank with all the foliage around that could prematurely detonate the round? It was either a shoulder fired AT rocket or an APFSDS from a tank out of frame.

I already saw the video on twitter and was just waiting for your follow up :D

Love your new Outro

I think the plume of smoke we see right after the Russian tank gets destroyed is actually shrapnel, looks like it's skipping across the ground

I think it's side shot anti tank HEAT mine... It's a perfect spot for that thing. Some forest with opening for vehicle to pass

@Nathan-jh1ho

Жыл бұрын

Yhea, the back blast is way too small for a anti-tank recoiless gun/rocket

Hey, great video as always, could you bring a review of the centauro B2?

Since the heat round appeared to come from the right side of the screen id say the dust being kicked up infront of the treeline is probably over penetration, shrapnel or spare ammo being cooked off

anybody got a link to the original video and what happened next? because the second russin tank is clearly still there and moving. what happened after this footage?

Thanks for the analysis

It appears from the first explosion that the projectile is cumulative and according to the trajectory of the jet, as you can see that the projectile was fired from point A to point B, I mean from the left and the right. But the location of the first launch is not shown in the video.

It's also possible the first hit penetrated into the turret (and set the ammo smoking) but he/they kept driving forwards as they were right next to enemies, hoping to get to better possible before bailing? Though those launch smokes just before the explosion seem very likely cause as well. They would hit the tank on the vulnerable sides / back.

Good redsplaination from RedEffect

Did the first tank get it at 0:58? If I look at x0.25 speed, I see the explosion at the tank BEFORE the light caused by what it has hit it. I really got the impression of something going away from the tank, and not to the tank. Can it be a missile that the tank shot... before being hit a few seconds later?

@xisotopex

Жыл бұрын

its a dm22 mine

absolutely your videos and explanations very nice bro

the exxplosion from the tank behind the trees was most likely as a result of the earlier attack. Often tanks are seen attacked, they carry on whilst parts of the surface burn before the entire tank explodes as the fuel and weapons get affected by the fire

Right before the two small dust plumes theres is a really slight glint that flies from left to right. Could be a sabot round with the plumes being the actual sabot.

Nice outro song selection

WOW Red Effect is so good..

Thanks for the objective analysis.

the first hit could also be the killing blow and just some delyed explosion while the tank was going on... samller fire inside whicht then detonated a charge later

Well I don't think this are Russian tanks , I mean at the end one tank has no cover from the tree lines and still moves on foreward . This T64 or whatever had a line of sight at him and could engage him , but we see nothing and the video is over after that . Min 2:33 , both have drones up in the air and they should know what's at the other side of that tree line . But this tank still does'nt turn it's gun in that direction and just keep's moving on . Ukraine also uses this cope cage's , strange video if you ask me .

@tomk3732

Жыл бұрын

Yep, exactly - both sides have drones and both have thermals - distances are TINY. Incoming "Russian" tanks have the supposed Ukrainian tanks right in front - within maybe 300 - 400m or less. They do not engage but TURN.

@graphics_travelers

Жыл бұрын

But don't Ukrainians usually tend not to have top-attack cages on their tanks? Unless, of course, they've employed a captured Russian tank.

@fabik805

Жыл бұрын

I don't think I have seen a Ukrainian tank use "cope cages".

@5co756

Жыл бұрын

@@graphics_travelers Maybe a captured one , you really can't tell what tank and what nation it is . Russian T72/80 should have thermals , they must have seen this other tanks down there . But the first one still keep's moving on with the gun pointed in front , looks more like a counter attack of Ukraine at Russian trenches . They made a few larger attacks the last day's , as we heard .

This war is still better managed than the Middle Eastern wars we used tank as artillery to hit targets 20 km away

@ahmadsaadi2196

Жыл бұрын

@Russia Bro Z (You know, like Dragonball Z lol) both armies couldn’t fight in modern era battles they were old schools but Iranian army were suffering a lot even before start of war most of elite generals and pilots were killed or imprisoned then got released to go to war the Iranian Air Force were the only one who could fight in good manner

First video of something hitting the infamous cope cage I ever saw and it worked.

@lutherburgsvik6849

Жыл бұрын

Ditto. Thought they were useless at defeating ATGMs. That's what the world and his wife said when they first appeared.

@bradenhagen7977

Жыл бұрын

Looks like the missile was going to be a miss high and just hopped to snag it.

@SergeantF8

Жыл бұрын

@@bradenhagen7977 Thats how NLAWS work, they go above the tank, and so do Javelins. NLAWS detonate when above a tank, and the rocket hit the cage before it could detonate above the tank

@gerfand

Жыл бұрын

@@lutherburgsvik6849 okay, I don't really get what you saying but why 3x?

@gerfand

Жыл бұрын

@@SergeantF8 hence working

It could also be that the "Original" ATGM shot that hits the "Cope Cage" actually penetrated into the tank, but crew didn't realize it or the small fire it cause on something other than Ammo, which eventually causes ammo to ignite..?

Comrade RedEffect is that song at the end a version the cyborgs soundtrack?

Alright, seems legit information. Thanks.

Incredible how fast the tank combusts

Might be over thinking it a bit. The atgm probably penetrated, but it took a little time for the tank to go up with the 'puffs' just being shrapnel.

Cope cage working well in action as long as you aim for it XD

good analysis!

Good analysis as usual

Tanks should always have ground support. Seems this worked out super well. Also seems that the disabled tank may have been there for awhile since the ground isn't tore up like with the one that is moving is.

Heat hit just next to the target, otherwise it doesnt do any dammage. EFP can form further away like the NLAW. What we see there is an EFP that exlodes some 30 meter away. EFP doesnt ignite ammo like heat does. So even if it hits the tank might not blow up. This round hit for sure and the tank stopped. Then a second round or a delay from the first hit blew up the tank.

it was either a drone or a cook off from the earlier hit

Rare instance of the cope cage actually working. Lmao

@iMost067

Жыл бұрын

They work more often than people think, just not against threats that people think. Usualy drone dropable munitions.

@gerfand

Жыл бұрын

@@iMost067 what I never saw was the contrary, but its not like there is many footage of it

@TheNicestPig

Жыл бұрын

@@iMost067 people look at them and think "lmao that can't possible stop a Javelin" Most things aren't Javelins, drone dropped HEAT warheads, RPG from the windows, heck, even some guy throwing a grenade, there are many things they can stop.

@bluefordpickup

Жыл бұрын

It worked? DId you not see the tank light off seconds after the hit?

@lunaticcultist9741

Жыл бұрын

​@@bluefordpickup Are you blind? The tank lit up after getting shot on the side armor by another tank, completely irrelevant! We are talking about the top turret slate armor!

That's some proper combined arm's warfare

Hi; can I ask you what the ending song s name is? Thanks in advance

Those are t64s, you can see it from the exhaust grill on the back.

To be fair though counting the same already knocked out/ vehicle abandoned vehicles multiple times is keeping in the best military traditions. Why it was confirmed after action around a French village that around 4 panther tanks that were knocked out, by tanks, air attack and an AT gun near a French villiage turned out to be a single vehicle that was abandoned after being knocked out by artillery before the battle even began.

WarThunder withdrawals makes a car collision seem like a tank duel

First shot seems to be German directionnal anti tank mines. I saws a couple a video of this mine and it looks like it.

Betting the infantry fired either a recoil-less rifle AT round or probably a disposable AT rocket launcher like AT-4 or SRAW

Is the video longer? Or was it CUT just after the tank ignited? If was cute i wonder WHY?

what is the song at the end of the video?

Finally after all these years we finally have a sequel of the movie fury!

looks like one of those wierd german mines hitting it.

This mostly looks like smoke being dropped on the area. Judging by the direction it came in and the explosion and NLAW hit the Russian tank, which managed to keep going until most likely its ammunition cooked off. The "puffs of smoke" id hazard a guess are just shrapnel. Spitballing but this fight was probably well underway before the video started.

another marvel from red effect

I think the two burst are mg fire and the cope cage while was likely not enough to prevent penetrating fragments would entering the turret and set off a blast/blaze. The mg fire could be the crew being shot at.

@dankmaster4542

Жыл бұрын

are you saying that machine gun bullet hit the cage and fragments penetrated the armored tanks turret top

@gamedude412

Жыл бұрын

@@dankmaster4542 Im saying fragmention from that cope cage hit There plenty of visible fragments that the commanders hatch appears to be open. 4-6 secs would be about the time need for a ember to smolder and catch something a propellant casing lets say... its hit 114 and 120 it gone

@dankmaster4542

Жыл бұрын

@@gamedude412 if the hatch was open, maybe. sorry i didnt look that closely you might be right but i think its very unlikely

bro love from serbia!!! snimaj više bratee!!

From the video wouldn’t the tank have been hit with a penetrating round that probably went straight through the turret perhaps? Would not that have caused the flame streak going from the stricken tank?

Hell on earth, would rather be anywhere but on that battlefield. I feel for all the men who are forced to fight.

Hypothetical question couldn't they upgrade the T80s by mounting the T90m turret on it or are they of different diameter

@sectero9450

Жыл бұрын

Cause T80(most of them BV and B) can only be repaired after 40 yers of rusting in 2-3 facilities 2 of which in far east, then its uses expensive turbine and have no improvments againts t72 hull and last there is no difference between t62 and t90m in russian tactics, they rather use them as SPA or as SPG.

@brendancrummey5723

Жыл бұрын

@@sectero9450 makes sense when you add that all together

@sectero9450

Жыл бұрын

@@brendancrummey5723 After USSR collapse, 90s with shutting most of facilities, cause u building democracy and don't need fucking 30k tanks, and 20 years of Putin policy builded by corruption and ignorance of any problem. They are making all they can from T90M to T55 everything that left from USSR is currently are in work, but its grains of what was, like "new" tanks are only produced in UVZ as most T72B upgrades, you have dying for 40 years Omsk and Kirov tank factories, which can repair T80 as T62 , then somehow alive repair facilities in far East for example they sre contacted to make 60 T62 and 8 T80BV per month and that's all of them. Also don't forget they don't get any cash , like NPZ , who produce optics for tanks didn't get paid like for 10 years now , Russian army have a lot of internal debts, which strict expanding of facilities.

Looks like it was hit by an NLAW

the only tank duel is that one earlier this year with t72 vs t80

Where did this happen?

I hope we get to see some proper tank duels, perhaps even with Leopards

@LarryPigeon1

Жыл бұрын

When they make it to the lines

Can you talk about the claimed abandoned amx 10s?

@02suraditpengsaeng41

Жыл бұрын

In youtube Short

@samsniper2000

Жыл бұрын

@@02suraditpengsaeng41 ah i didn't see that thanks bro

They're starting to make those cages with ERA on them I think that's a good idea

They're getting closer though.

Damn, that must be 0% survival chance for the crew members. Hurts to see casualties from both sides. People get too carried away with politics and forgets that it is people who get hurt or die in wars 😢

@ni9274

Жыл бұрын

yes but one side is invading so it's harder to have compassion for them, but I agree many Russians soldiers were endoctrinated or forced in that conflict and doesn't deserve to die like that.

@CreDFull

Жыл бұрын

⁠​⁠@@ni9274 you’re indoctrinated to love the west, so what? Wave your rainbow flag and remember you have no voice

@the_babbleboom

Жыл бұрын

if you put a wolfsangel on your tank i'm not loosing any sleep over watching you go up in flames

@Memovox

Жыл бұрын

@@ni9274 You care for neither.

@ni9274

Жыл бұрын

@@Memovox I assume you're pro-Russian ? Sorry to tell you but Ukrainians are choosing to fight, the narrative of "Zelensky is forcing Ukrainian to fight" is false.

honestly...i got no problem with cope cages long as they don't restrict the crew's ability to get out or see. yeah its cheap, it likely wont stop anything. but in the 1 in a million chance it does...its paid itself off for a literal scrap cost. so...why not.

@Nyxcha

Жыл бұрын

@Russia Bro Z (You know, like Dragonball Z lol) double so when ukraine has been shown using quad copters to literally drop grenades on top of russian positions this cage, even sloppily made, would be perfect to remove the risk of that causing trouble with the tank optics

Nice a analysis.

seemed like a tow 2b hit on the cope cage.

Could the small gusts of dust be the parts that are discarded from APFDS shells after firing?

@crforfreedom7407

Жыл бұрын

No, those were Javelins being fired and destroying RU armor. Same tree-line tactic I saw a year ago. Why the hell troops can just stand in the open with NO FEAR from RU rocket/arty is just mind blowing to me.

@Procrastinater

Жыл бұрын

@@crforfreedom7407 Javelins being used within 50 meters of the target? Doubtful.

@crforfreedom7407

Жыл бұрын

@@Procrastinater There were legion of video from a year ago that decimated RU armor with this same tree-line tactic. I saw it over, and over, and over again.

@crforfreedom7407

Жыл бұрын

@@Procrastinater This is also why RU can't take Vuhledar or Avdiivka: They let UAF troops just stand in the open with no fear of rockets or artillery, and lob Javelins. Madness.

@mbtenjoyer9487

Жыл бұрын

@@crforfreedom7407NLAW perhaps ?

Tank battles rarely happen these days because they get taken out by artillery long before they can even see another tank.

I'm betting it was a third tank and that those are sabot petals hitting the ground.

Rip crew :(

Methinks it's a squad of Ukr infantry with NLAWs and Carl Gustavs and/or AT4. Also saw the possibility the first blast with the visible jet may be an off-route AT mine placed by the infantry. Whatever it was, 3(+?) shots at the enemy tells me they really wanted him to rapidly disassemble.

@gerfand

Жыл бұрын

Nlaw for first hit and something with possibly Tandem warhead for second. Nlaw at that distance is possible but its close to its safe distance possibly was a RPG-7 since they are used more often... Albeit not with Tandem, but its not like the other ones there have it

@meskalin64

Жыл бұрын

Yeah it looks like NLAW with the EFP.

@rogue__agent5884

Жыл бұрын

More likely NLAW than AT-4 or Carl Gustav

@tomk3732

Жыл бұрын

Friendly kill? Clearly these tanks and what is known as UA tanks do not engage even later on. All 4 tanks are thus Ukrainian.

Looks like this is the last year video.

0:57 WTF the cope cage worked ???

Looks like a directional AT mine

Tanks vs tank is very uncommon in this war. Inmobilisation and then kill by another weaponsystem seams to be more common.

Something like a dm22? At least for the last 2 hits.

What if it was a sabot round from a yet another Ukrainian tank "intercepted" by some sort of an APS? The puffs of dust could be sabot petals...The firing tank could be hiding on the other side of the treeline. With the sabot fired from this distance the APS probably didn't do all that well, hence the tank finally caught fire a few moments later.