Go to ground.news/redeffect to stay fully informed on breaking news, compare coverage and avoid media bias. Try it out or subscribe through my link for 30% off unlimited access before August 4 and get it for as little as $5 a month.

@alexnderrrthewoke4479

9 ай бұрын

Red effect will you talk fully about t-80bvm you say it's trash but it's being produced in mass and confirmed by Russian authorities and it's performing good in combat. Your assessment of the tank was rather underestimated

@gregorykalashnik4434

9 ай бұрын

Ka-52, Ka-52M Performance analyzation?

@MegaGoran333

9 ай бұрын

Why are you gae RedEffectChannel? To su vaše rvatske i europske vrline. Hahahahahahahahaha 😂

@steveosborne2297

9 ай бұрын

I would suggest you refer to the local newspaper by the UVZ factory because in May 2022 they stated that virtually the entire workforce had been laid off because there was no work for them to do ; they were not rehired until about October 2022 when they received the order to refurbish T 62s and T72s . I seriously believe any T90s we have seen since May 2022 are probably T90AMs at best as they were 200 T90As in Storage .

@MegaGoran333

9 ай бұрын

@@steveosborne2297 Do you really think that Russian MOD must inform you or any of us about what they are doing?!? Wake the fk up kid ....

Regardless of whether you're pro-Russian or pro-Ukrainian, let's appreciate the fact that the T-90, T-14, Leopard (2A-6 and -7), and Abrams tanks are undeniably impressive in terms of, at least, their striking appearance.

@stranger6797

9 ай бұрын

T90m and Abrams are good looking, t14 is very ugly in my opinion

@Just_A_Random_Desk

9 ай бұрын

@@stranger6797 The T-14 is so fucking massive

@UBEChoca

9 ай бұрын

I respect these vehicles only wish it to be admired and not used.

@MGZetta

9 ай бұрын

NAFO bots gonna come after you for mentioning Russian tanks next to their "invincible" tanks. Lmao.

@stephenhartley2853

9 ай бұрын

i support neither. both sides are conscripting their prolitariat so some rich people can stay rich. supporting imperialism is cringe.

I think that the Leopard 2 and the T-90M are in the same boat, both are great tanks but when there are so many ATGMs and artillery in a large war they are going to get destroyed, no tank is invincible whether Western, Russian, Chinese, or any other.

@90enemies

9 ай бұрын

One day there will be a tank that's truly invisible You can't shoot what you can't see 🤓

@panzerschiff9805

9 ай бұрын

​@90enemies The Armata is already the invisible tank Nobody has ever seen it in combat, with 0 combat loses.

@improperamoger

9 ай бұрын

​@@panzerschiff9805 Same with Abrams X or KF-51. What's your point?

@adamwu4565

9 ай бұрын

@@90enemies Anti-tank mines will work just the same on an invisible tank as on any other tank.

@basharalassad1073

9 ай бұрын

leopard tanks design belives storing 80% ammo in the hull is save with only 3 armor paltes on the side protecting the side armor cant be compared to a tank that has ERA mounted on mudguards to avoid weakspots

Both russia and ukraine are lucky that new zealand hasnt unleashed the mighty bob semple tank on them.

@AsukaLangleyS02

9 ай бұрын

That meme was never funny, please off yourself.

@devoidoverlord1836

9 ай бұрын

Fear the perfect box that is bob semple

@EmperorEdu

9 ай бұрын

Overused

@AlreadyTakenTag

9 ай бұрын

​​​​@@EmperorEduIt may be overused but it's still very much the truth. The Bob is coming...

@TheRealGazebo

9 ай бұрын

@@AlreadyTakenTagunfunny

"Emperor protects" Love that reference.

@theriddler6994

9 ай бұрын

He indeed does.

@gomongoose

9 ай бұрын

Proven Protection compared to Swastika .. 😉

@notworldwarthunder2035

9 ай бұрын

Only in death does duty end

@zhenoob

9 ай бұрын

I WILL EASE THE MACHINE SPIRIT'S PAIN

@araizex

9 ай бұрын

Even in death i still serve.

In an era where Anti-tank weapons have evolved to incredible levels and kamikaze drones are most lethal, it is impossible to say one tank has performed badly, especially when most of the tanks were taken out when they were least expecting it. Cause the same arguments made about T-90s performance can be said about Leopard 2s performance. Both advanced tanks that have been taken out by weapons they really have no guaranteed defense against

@ineedapharmists

9 ай бұрын

Find me a video of a Leopard 2's turrent joining the space program

@chanut5678

9 ай бұрын

​@@ineedapharmistsi dont have a video but you can go search destroyed turkey leopards

@agentc7020

9 ай бұрын

@@ineedapharmists I'll find you a video of a leopard burned down.

@Jameslockheeart

9 ай бұрын

@@ineedapharmists One lol, 2 leopards tend to like burning idk why though? maybe it's fun for the tank lol

@Tonixxy

9 ай бұрын

​@@ineedapharmiststhere is a video of at least 1 turret detonation

Doesn't matter what the tank is, it's all fodder to artillery, helicopters, missiles and now drones. Tanks are not meant to operate in isolation with just ground forces. They are all sitting ducks to weapons designed to counter them. We informed people knew that the Leopard 2 was not "game changer" like media claimed. Nor would the Abrams be game changing.

@M18Hellcat-17

9 ай бұрын

1. That depends if Russian anti tank weapons works 2. Tanks are very much not sitting ducks (the Russians just used tanks stupidly). With the amount of air defenses and man pads, Ukraine has almost eliminated any threat from helicopters and aircraft. In this regard, introducing new and better tanks to the Ukraine battlefield will give them a huge advantage in combat. Ukraine should settle for nothing less than their entire territory liberated.

@Drxyz-tk6le

9 ай бұрын

​@@M18Hellcat-17you are stupid troll aren't you. Russian korent systems and Lancet systems are causing havoc on the battlefield. The Kamov Choppers are a bug pain in the ass and have been the centre point for supplying Ukraine with F16s. Doesn't matter how many 'game changers' you give them. They will all burn on the Ukrainian plains. As for Russian weapon systems not working. Well Atleast you accepted that they have weapon system. Last year you were saying they just have rusted shovels.

@OurAshX

9 ай бұрын

Ground support melts during artillery strikes as well… both sides are heavy on cluster munitions now… tanks will be alone 😢

@OurAshX

9 ай бұрын

@@M18Hellcat-17what is going in Robotino now?

@user-dp4ok9ox5w

9 ай бұрын

Mines too.

After the priest blesses the tank, the crew parameters all max out and their qualifications level up from expert to ace upon entering the tank

@MaxMTTpm

9 ай бұрын

i wish my tanks were priest certified 😔

@user-uc4vg4rg9e

9 ай бұрын

Got that crusade feel

@tigertankboy2439

9 ай бұрын

maybe gajin can add the priest as a modification to russian tanks (survivability +10)

@AugustSchroif

9 ай бұрын

@@tigertankboy2439 only for golden eagles

@harishadzibulic6603

9 ай бұрын

I dont know, but i feel like he is a bishop.

They must be new, surely, if the priest hasn't buffed them ever before. +5 holy damage is standard I thought.

@rick7424

9 ай бұрын

Why not employ a thousand priests to convert the enemy with a "whololo"?

@red-if2xl

9 ай бұрын

@@rick7424 bless buff is not stack.

T-90M Proryv-3 design is just beautiful 😍

@gfgffdd

9 ай бұрын

Those tanks look so beauteful. I absolutly agree.

@MoskusMoskiferus1611

9 ай бұрын

I agree

@CruzHackett

9 ай бұрын

Agree,the turret shape better than abrams for me

@majed8192

9 ай бұрын

The most beautiful and elegant looking tank in the world!! I mean I love Abrams, Challengers and Black Panther, but still nothing compares to the T-90M, it hits that sweet spot between a Soviet looking tank - a look that I love - and a modern one with it's turret design and chain armour and it's beautiful side skirts

@user-fq1uw3qw9b

9 ай бұрын

Merkava

These tanks have +25% damage vs undead and 25% resistance vs magic

@nimay13

9 ай бұрын

+10% resistance against Holy magic

@alexanderwolf8766

9 ай бұрын

25% damage against elves and 25% defense against lgbtq+

@bennittotheburrito9606

9 ай бұрын

@@alexanderwolf8766cringe lol

@MrKersey

9 ай бұрын

@@alexanderwolf8766 don't forget +50% damage against the famous world movie industry location groomers as well.

@kingping3933

9 ай бұрын

SAINT JAVELIN 😎😎

Most of us here love MBTs and so on. The best thing might have been if the conflict never happend. Peoples lives would not have been lost nor any thing else for that matter.

@timyrabbit

9 ай бұрын

Wow thanks, did you say this as well in 2014?

@ayumalani5631

9 ай бұрын

​@@timyrabbitshould be said in 2003 as well

@hobbypriester2252

9 ай бұрын

@@timyrabbitich habe auch 2014 darüber geredet. War 2014 in Odessa, kurz bevor dort ca 50 Menschen hingerichtet wurden😢

@fabik805

9 ай бұрын

@@timyrabbit Yes maybe the Russian backed separatists should have said this before they started the war in 2014.

This topic has literally bothering me whole day, to know how many t90m were really destroyed. And here you are, tnx bro!

@billhanna2148

9 ай бұрын

Yeah he has to be the only channel that has done ANY due diligence on what is or is Not a tank loss .. kudo's 👏👏👏

Holy dam the T 90M is soo dam badass

@Jameslockheeart

9 ай бұрын

I want one for xmas!🥰

@adoptedveryishungry

9 ай бұрын

Bro, you should look at it with open tracks. Kinda cool looking

Yeah YOU have to be the only channel that has done ANY due diligence on what is or is Not a tank loss .. kudo's sir 👏👏👏

@osmacar5331

9 ай бұрын

yeup the propaganda machine is saying athrown or ditched tank is a loss... even though it is recovered and out the next day XD

@devendoffing7004

9 ай бұрын

@@osmacar5331because a crew loss/bail or mobility kill is still a kill in battle. Some can be repaired later sure, but in the battle they’re still kills.

@weybye91

9 ай бұрын

if your crew leaves the tank, its a dead tank, since its not operational

@nemiw4429

9 ай бұрын

​​@@osmacar5331 where are ur Aserbaidschan vs Armenia comments? Nowhere, ur brain needs to be steered where to parrot arround. I know its hard for u to realize ur a bot. But at least... ur alive, good job at breathing.

@tetispinkman9135

9 ай бұрын

​@@osmacar5331or the propoganda machine shows 5 different angles of single leopard and says it's 5 leopards destroyed

3:05 tech priest performing pre battle rituals to calm the machine spirit, I see.

@Kristof1

9 ай бұрын

Sounds so like warhammer 40k

You are the first person I have seen since the war started to put this much research into the performance of Russian T-90M since all of the spotlight is on Leopards and western IFVs

@jakubw.2779

9 ай бұрын

Partly because as said there's not that much of them and there's not that much of footage of them in Ukraine. Also soviet/russian tanks are literally EVERYWHERE where there's active conflict, western equipement not so much and if it is it's rather in professionaly trained hands with full air, intel and artillery support, so they are usually performing very effectively. That's why everyone was much interested how will they perform in hastily trained hands with almost no air support and limited artillery support against equal opponent.

@carwyngriffiths

9 ай бұрын

Covert canals did a video o; this days ago.😊

@fabik805

9 ай бұрын

@@jakubw.2779 I mean T90m tanks are quite rare. But you are kind of right, Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams just sounds more exciting for the media than T90m. It is just another "Russian tank".

@cdgncgn

9 ай бұрын

@@fabik805 who owns media ? those who produce western tank.

@NeoxitBG

9 ай бұрын

Братле защо си го сложил този нацистки символ на знамето ни? 😀🤦‍♂️

Let's go! Whenever you upload I know it's gonna be great

I’ve read some news and they working on making a new transmission that would change upgrade reverse speed up to 15 km .

@MichaelK1710

9 ай бұрын

Can you provide a link?

@larryfoulke1596

9 ай бұрын

Well if that true that a good thing, because 4KM/H IS JUST STUPID

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

9 ай бұрын

@@larryfoulke1596it’s not. I was a former T-72 tanker with the 6th guards motor rifle regiment, the reverse speed is slow because in order to have a high gear ratio, speed must be sacrificed. Therefore, all soviet tanks have superior torque in reverse compared to western tanks (and thus are easier to get themselves unstuck from mud/ditches). It’s not like there wasn’t a good reason for the reverse speed to be low

Regarding the last point about the Russians not wanting everyone to see where they're deploying T-90s, I'm reminded of a problem created by having both a cheap kind of tank for general use and a more capable one for important operations. Namely, that the enemy knows the main effort is wherever those pricier tanks show up. Now, you could use the higher end tanks as a distraction, but that's hardly the most efficient way to use them. In WWII, if Panzer IIIs and IVs were attacking one place, and Tigers were attacking the other, the Allied commander knew where he should send reinforcements. The Red Army created the same problem later in the Cold War with T-54/55s, T-62s, and T-72s send to most units, with T-64s and T-80s sent to breakthrough formations.

@AugustSchroif

9 ай бұрын

When you are hit by a HE shell the last thing you are going to care about is what tank launched it.

@tigerpanzer8220

9 ай бұрын

@@AugustSchroif the grunts on the front line probably don't but the higher ups in the war room does care for reasons that the dude has elaborately explained

@rat_king-os2lp

9 ай бұрын

Idk if I agree with that. I recall seeing a video on telegram of both a T-54 and a T90 fighting within the same location. It seems that the tanks are probably just used for different purposes on the field.

@arnyarny7991

9 ай бұрын

Leopard 2a4 was in Yugoslavia against t55 some of them was damaged t55 t54 can shoot on 10km !

@arnyarny7991

9 ай бұрын

Leopards was use in in counter offensive few times today attack was from few places massive

This isnt an analysis of the performance of the T-90M, this is just a look at how many have been in the war and how many have been destroyed, nothing else.

@KashtanGreg

9 ай бұрын

comparing to leopard tanks, 20 T90M lost in 1,5 years and 10+ leopards lost in 1,5 month, T90M would be having a better survivability thanks to era stopping artillery/tandem charges

@nixles2577

9 ай бұрын

​@@KashtanGregПолностью уничтожено 5 леопардов и кучка машин разминирования на их базе, я понимаю что наверняка многие леопарды которые выглядят снаружи нормально могут быть уничтожены изнутри, но это не факт. Откуда информация про 10 уничтоженных лео?

@KashtanGreg

9 ай бұрын

@@nixles2577 sam avtor skazal, shto ih uzhe mnogo unizhtozheno, da i on razborki nekotoryh delal.

@eliasziad7864

9 ай бұрын

@@KashtanGreg There is actually 29 lost leopards.

@aimxdy8680

9 ай бұрын

@@KashtanGregRussia doesn’t send much T90s yet still losses them Eben then those leapords lost are Old leapord 2A4 Export models against russians newest T90M. Now let’s see iraq, where Iraq lost 3000 russian tanks while there is only 10 lost leapord tanks.

I'd love to see Red Effect create similar video on Leopard 2s Performance as well. We don't know the exact count of T-90s in battle field but we know exactly how many Ukraine got. The combat effectiveness of the Leapards at the hands of AFU, importance of crew training and the tank's high rate of casualty at the hands of cheaper drones.

@Texo333

9 ай бұрын

True we have 2 confirmed leopard 2A6 tanks destroyed from 21 delivered and like 7 or so damaged... i think Training plays a huge role here as well

@Tonixxy

9 ай бұрын

What performance all tanks that got into field of battle were BTFO by either drones/ATGMS/artillery/mines

@donaldtrumplover2254

9 ай бұрын

Are Russians even really using the t-90 at the moment? From what I’ve heard they’re mostly just repairing and modernizing t-80, t-72, and t-64 tanks.

@Tonixxy

9 ай бұрын

@@donaldtrumplover2254 they have around 100 on the field

@vojtechpribyl7386

9 ай бұрын

@@donaldtrumplover2254 They probably do, but they are not numerous compared to the older tanks and thanks to the better electronics overall they probably have them screened by less valuable units and thus less exposed.

I think the Russians have been very careful with these, we rarely see them in combat. They probably deploy these at the best spots on the front with the best conditions for tank movements. Ukraines leopards and Russias T90m are both in a very tough spot. They can’t use their best weapons very much for fear of losing their limited numbers. There are simply to many mines, atgms and artillery batteries for them to be used ideally now in this static fase of the war. Any assault by these things are met with mines beneath, rockets in front and drones/ artillery from above. It’s just super risky to use these.

@nihluxler1890

9 ай бұрын

The T-90 still has an advantage. It’s significantly cheaper and easier to produce, which is ultimately what success in war boils down to. If loosing a single leopard is equivalent to loosing 2 or 3 T-90s then you’re better off with the latter.

@Jameslockheeart

9 ай бұрын

agreed!

@jgw9990

9 ай бұрын

​@@nihluxler1890War production also includes people. If 3 T90 crews are lost but only 1 leopard is, then that's a loss for Russia. Especially if the better designed Leopard results in crew survival, to fight again in a new vehicle with more experience.

@notmyburner3225

9 ай бұрын

"we rarely see them in combat" correct, YOU rarely see them in combat & when you do its from a heavily edited video. It's likely used a lot cause its a tank bro.

@notmyburner3225

9 ай бұрын

@@nihluxler1890Leopards offer better crew protection. T-90's not so much. If your crews are losing tanks but surviving & those tanks can be replaced/recovered you are suffering less attrition. Also the cost vs cost strategy has been proven wrong time and time again. Its all about attrition.

BRADLEY GO BRRRRRRRR

The point about russians being aware of the poor reverse speed issue and addressing it with cheap solutions, like ERA instead of the root cause, the transmission is valid, but redesigning it and refitting the entire fleet even of just T90s during a very hot war is simply not realistic. If after the war ends they refuse to fix it, especially now that they are way more liberal about spending money on military equipment, then we can criticise them for it.

@MrZlocktar

9 ай бұрын

Yet they actually did it. Some tank crew even mentioning this aspect in their reports. About reverse speed of 15km. Which is not much, but infinitely better than before. Probably last batches had this issue fixed, but it's hard to tell. I would still put ERA there regardless. It's just smart thing to do. These tanks are not heavy, they can put a lot of ERA on them.

@MatoVuc

9 ай бұрын

@@MrZlocktar guess that's possible. I'll wait for visual confirmation though, as i don't think the logistical burden of two different transmissions on one type of tank is a smart thing to do in the middle of a hot war.

I don’t think the performance of any tank can be based in confirmed tanks in the conflict or losses. Most of the time we don’t know the work that tank has done before getting destroyed, it maybe did an amazing job and even if its destroyed it might have paid is debt short of say, or maybe was destroyed at the first moment it saw battle. Also the crew and tactics matter a lot so I don’t think the title of the video is correct. But good video anyway.

@notmyburner3225

9 ай бұрын

ding ding ding

@notmyburner3225

9 ай бұрын

Force employment is more important

@somebody7889

9 ай бұрын

@@notmyburner3225 that’s inside the tactics department I think. Very important indeed.

@nateatheon9191

9 ай бұрын

I agree

Great update as always, definitely one of my favourite channels

I love you RedEffect! Your new outro absolutely slaps! You should let it play the full song😂

@alexanderp8037

9 ай бұрын

Old outro was more satisfyimg

To me, its doing what it must do, doing TANK things on the field

@notmyburner3225

9 ай бұрын

This is honestly a better analysis. It's a tank meant to do tank stuff. A better thing to focus on would be an analysis of how Russia and Ukraine employ & use tanks in Defensive & Offensive operations and how well they execute according to doctrine.

@joebidome1445

9 ай бұрын

​@notmyburner3225 mostly as fire support with NLOS fires due to a lack of shells and inadequate counter-battery fire. Also a lack of SPAA's, both Pantsirs and Geoards are protecting cities from drone attacks, not the troops on the ground.

@KBKriechbaum

9 ай бұрын

It kills its crew when hit by cheap drone munitions. Its a flaw you cannot change with the T-72. And fundamentally, a T-90 is still a T-72.

good work, thank you for keeping us updated

@TheArklyte

9 ай бұрын

Video: posted 28 minutes ago Comment about good work: 27 minites ago. Channel with no activity that posted the comment:

@ashtray1786

9 ай бұрын

@@TheArklyte this is wrong buddy i just wanted to give him credits generall, english is not my motherlanguage if this was confusing or something i apologize

@billhanna2148

9 ай бұрын

Yeah he has to be the only channel that has done ANY due diligence on what is or is Not a tank loss .. kudo's 👏👏👏

Dang, this is a really good video, well done! You just got yourself a new sub. Seriously, man. Great work!

red effect you should really talk about a lone russian tank destroying 2 ukranian tanks and 5 mraps just after a tree line its really interesting and it was prety close

@biejaleslol1225

9 ай бұрын

@@mikes989 thank you for the correction, do you have the video of the similar case last year? perhaps a link

Great video as usual, bro

Love the "Emperor Protects" reference.

decades of "war on terrorism" had dampened our understanding of how deadly conventional war truly is.

Flawless segue into an applicable ad. Nice work.

Great video, always appreciate your neutral and pragmatic methods.

For me the issue is the number of images and videos that the Russians show of the tanks they destroy and the little or no amount of videos that Ukraine shows of the tanks they destroy. Zelensky would show these videos at any time if he had them, because he is a propaganda expert, since he doesn't show them, he leads me to believe that the number of tanks that Ukraine destroys is much lower compared to that of Russia.

U deserve more subscribers amazing unbiased videos keep it going

In my opinion this is a great performance of a modern tank. Especially considering how many ATGM's and anti tank tech there is in this war. Of course there is also what you brought up, the fact we don't know how often they get used on the front. But regardless these numbers are not super duper bad.

It would be interesting to compile and compare % loss rate of each tank throughout the war accounting for delivery and production number

@user-hm8eh6be8c

9 ай бұрын

Лучшим танком окажется Челленджер. Ни одного танка не удалось подбить. Правда и в бою ни одного пока что не видели ;))

@reddyforlenny9389

4 ай бұрын

A challenger was destroyed not long ago actually ​@user-hm8eh6be8c

As for the size of a "batch" of newly delivered vehicles: early in the war I read news that called a delivery of 25-40 Russian vehicles a batch. I read this first when a batch of T-80BVMs were delivered to fighting troops but i might be wrong about the vehicle type as it was over a year ago.

@andreasfjellborg1810

9 ай бұрын

Yeah the deliverys are larger if you count all tanks, updated T72B3, T80's and so on.

@user-me5oq3kl4h

9 ай бұрын

There is also a possibility that some batches just not reported being delivered

@dmitrypoletaev7478

9 ай бұрын

The batch can consist not only of T-90M's. Also modernising a T-80BV to the BVM standart is much easier than producing a brand new T-90M or modernising older T-90's to T-90M level, because a completely new turret has to be produced for such a modernisation. Therefore it's reasonable to expect that T-90M-only batches are smaller or that T-90M's are only a part of larger tank batches.

@stevebuckley7788

9 ай бұрын

Maybe I'm just swallowing Russian MoD and Ural tank factory BS but about a year ago they claimed to have 800 partially built T-90s in storage and claimed they were aiming to produce 100 a month, firstly by depleting the reserve stock and also by reopening all of their workshops. I genuinely think you are grossly underestimating their production levels although the majority of tanks are not being shipped directly to the front.

@grudgebearer1404

9 ай бұрын

​@@stevebuckley7788As other said, T-90M is a T-90 that is a T-72 on a slightly modified chassis and a new turret, this means that "partially built" can mean absolutely anything, too... So, not necessarily a lie, but most probably some embellished words, just like the US can only built 12 Abrams a month but can upgrade already built ones way faster...

>The standard transmission of a t-90m is five forward and one reverse. >It could be upgraded to 3 forward and 3 backward for best all terrain. >Or the french specialty 1 forward 5 backward. Yes all of that for a french joke.

@eliasziad7864

9 ай бұрын

So why dont they do 4 foward 2 reverse?

Your statistics are great! It's great to see someone with academic spirit make such a detailed and unbiased video!

Oh boy I cant wait to read all the intelligent and sain comments on this video with no political agendas whatsoever. 😑

@juliuszkocinski7478

9 ай бұрын

That comment section is suprisingly civil so far

The problem is that those tanks are very rarely seen in actual combat, I strongly believe that a T-90M in a tank to tank combat would prove much more effective then a T-90M used as support

@panterka.f

9 ай бұрын

in a ww2 style scenario t90's would steamroll Leo2's

@Armoredcompany

9 ай бұрын

The biggest issue is that they aren't DESIGNED to be support tanks. The T-series was developed for the doctrine of "throw giant walls of tanks at the enemy and overwhelm them as fast as possible". They were never intended to be used 1-3 at a time supporting infantry from a distance. They were designed to just charge like old-time cavalry and get as closed as possible as fast as possible where infantry-operated anti-armor weapons become far less effective (believe it or not, there is a point where the tank is TOO CLOSE and it is farther away than you would think). Sitting back at 100m+ only plays into the tank's weaknesses, not it's strengths.

@adane1520

9 ай бұрын

@@panterka.fbased off what exactly?

@Stan-oc1nu

9 ай бұрын

@@Armoredcompany you are incorrect. Russian doctrine for example dictates usage of tanks as an anti-tank weapon in defence, where t90 can utilise its supposed range advantage over western tanks caused by usage of guided missiles shot through a barrel. As for minimal ranges go - arming distance of rpg-7 rocket is around 15-25 meters and could be less depending on the rocket. minimal range for t90 to engage a target on the ground is at least 100 meters. Charging the enemy is done not to get into the minimal range of the AT weapons but to achieve the breakthrough which is the ultimate goal of any armour attack. What they are indeed not designed to do - is to play a role of artillery and fire from closed positions. that is a complete deviation from a doctrine and caused by the lack of SPAs.

@Armoredcompany

9 ай бұрын

@@Stan-oc1nu ah yes, fire an RPG at a tank 25m away and let me know how that ends for you... The guided missile doesn't really provide much of a range advantage when an APFSDS round can be shot basically the same range and will arrive long before the missile does. There is a reason the US didn't pursue the Starship and Sheridan concepts any further.

"The tank was blessed by a priest, the Emperor protects" that line killed me lmao

I always look forward to your videos o7

red effect can you make a video on the VT4? I think VT4 is on the same level of T90M, some area its weaker, some area its better...but overall, I would take a T90M over VT4, especially after T90M has experienced high intensity combat and getting upgraded. But i find it interesting that VT4 is priced slightly more expensive than T90M, but again, depends on the contract details, unti price is affected by number of tanks, whether ammo included or not? whether crew training included? and whether repair center included? so again, it might not be what it seems. thanks.

@life1042

9 ай бұрын

VT4 is better. Russian t90 can't even drive backwards fast. Also thermal and night vision are much better on VT4.

@timothy1949

9 ай бұрын

@@life1042 T90M backward is a pain in the ass. but protection T90M wins easily, vt4 doesnt have that much ERA coverage and the UFP is covered with a rather old and thin ERA (not sure why)...also T90M has multiple cameras (unless i mistaken) but im not sure i seen those on vt4. VT4 "might" have better engine and hp/t but i cant confirm. also its hard to find info on optics stuff, i think they are quite comparable and VT4 might have slightly better given china's advancement in electronics.

@life1042

9 ай бұрын

Thanks for the information will look into it more 😃 any idea why russuan us producing tanks so slowly ? Why no mass production ?

@timothy1949

9 ай бұрын

@@life1042 my info might not be right, so im hoping red effect can make a video on it, he gives opinion based on sources instead of emotion (like many youtubers out there), but since he hasn't made one, probably he is finding it hard to find credible info on VT4. actually russia is mass producing T72B3 and T90M, also BMP3...you can check on youtube, the factories keep handing over batch after batch of these vehicles...now T90M is no longer a rare tank in ukraine war...ofc T72B3 always the backbone

@RainlineX

9 ай бұрын

Vt4 it’s a T-72B3 lvl , btw T-72B3M>VT-4

Respect to the amount of time and effort you put into these videos.Informative and very detailed.Thanx for doing tanks justice.

great video, balanced as always. THANKS!!!

Is this supposed to be one of those pro-R fanboy videos that LazerPig accused you of making?

@definitelyfrank9341

8 ай бұрын

Yeah. By the way, the only reason he made this video was to prove to the Russian fanboys that Russia hadn't yet reached the 200 T-90Ms produced milestone, yet. He clarified this in his response video.

did you see that 2v1 10 minute tank on tank battle, there were some, what i believe to be some Maxxpros around 7 but they contributed very little to the overall outcome of the battle

It seem like the T-90M has made significant improvements in survivability.

@twirlyturd4364

9 ай бұрын

One just obliterated a column of Ukrainian armoured vehicles including two T64BVs and 4 APCS, Ghost of Kiev ain’t nothing but a ghost 😂

@Joaquin546

9 ай бұрын

source: trust me bro

@WorshipinIdols

9 ай бұрын

@@Joaquin546 ya that other guys is full of BS. But if u were talking to me, the T-90m has made enumerable improvements to the old design that has vastly reduced the odds of munitions cool off, plus a 360 degree panorama, 3rd gen thermal imagining seeker, commanders cupola is huge in terms of situational awareness. Etc.. just watch any video on the subject of your choice.

@WorshipinIdols

9 ай бұрын

@@twirlyturd4364 I’ll believe it when I see it.

The era of tanks is gone. Today you get a 500 dollars drone and tell a nerd to fly it on a tank

I think that yesterdays video about T-90 facing ukraininan military column puts the end to all shit against this tank. T-90M - is one of the best tanks ever.

T-90m is best looking tank regardless....

@nattly6340

9 ай бұрын

na i think the challanger 2 looks the best... but each their own

@mrmadmax4523

9 ай бұрын

​@@nattly6340challenger 3 will look even better soon

@sogerc1

9 ай бұрын

Better than the Leopards but I'm afraid I have to give the title to the Abrams.

@haaxeu6501

9 ай бұрын

IMO the best looking tank is the Type 10, T90M still has that very janky soviet look

I know how hard the feeling is when losing an advanced tank, that is why I switched back to T-34-85 and Is-1 tanks instead of T-44-100 and IS-2 in War Thunder.

@M4_Sherman587

9 ай бұрын

thats a pretty flawed comparison, since in WT you can repair your tanks for a few silver lions…

@pavel-makarov777

9 ай бұрын

@@M4_Sherman587 i forgot to say that I will switch back to tier 5 when I finish researching tier 4 using tier 3 tanks, i just want to make my research easier

Thank for your analysis.

Salute to your research

I've heard there was a video out there of a T90M taking 19 hits from various AT weapons and keeping going. Anybody know anything about that, maybe got a link?

@andrehahn8006

9 ай бұрын

Yes but it was deleted idk why. I saw it took 4 good hit and still moving.

@mirzasufi9204

9 ай бұрын

dafuq if that true there should be a video on the telegram

@pilotman9819

9 ай бұрын

It got deleted. But it was a T-90M Obr 2023.

@ulforcemegamon3094

9 ай бұрын

@@pilotman9819 i wonder why it got deleted

@Bren.nto6971

9 ай бұрын

​@@ulforcemegamon3094because its against CIA & western media 💸 narrative

+5 holy protection :)

@alexnderrrthewoke4479

9 ай бұрын

Yes can't wait for next civ update or new civ 7

What about the t-90 sm or Ms or whatever it was called that was all techy, how does it compare

The holy water armor upgrade improves the side armor protection against heat rounds by 0.000000000000000815%

@KonradvonHotzendorf

4 ай бұрын

I laughed so much at that upgrade 😅

Hi RE, will it be reasonable to change the tank's transmission ?

@ThickestKYLE

9 ай бұрын

Not without a complete redesign of the hull and engine

@gheetza14

9 ай бұрын

​@@ThickestKYLEremove a gear, remove the reverse gear, and you have enough room for a reverser. same forward and reverse speed

@rick7424

9 ай бұрын

Finally a legitimate comment!

@MatoVuc

9 ай бұрын

On one example or test tank, no problem. Has already been done by some western companies for east european T-72s, without radical hull redesigns. Practically, not while the war is still going. Aint nobody shipping the hundreds of tanks back to factories to be refitted, especially when said factories have a more important task of producing new vehicles 24/7.

@auzk2js71

9 ай бұрын

@@MatoVuc Why not modify the tanks which are still being produced

A 90s config Bradley made one shit its pants with just 20mm, not even the ATGM...

@xyxy1631

4 ай бұрын

*25mm

No matter which side you are on, we must always seek for the truth. And this channel represents the truth in the best of their ability. Respect to RedEffect.

@RaNc0R

9 ай бұрын

Yeah but I wouldn’t count on oryx

I think that 200 T-90MS production number is from an interview, But that one mentioned 200 new produced PER YEAR. We are just 2/3 of a year in, so 120 PRODUCED seems about right, if we consider deliveries in batches. That same Interview mentioned 800 "refurbished" Tanks in the same time period though, which to me, was the actual astonishing part. The T-80 is no slouch either.

It depends on what the tanks are doing. Tank on Tank battles are very unlikely, it is more reasonable to expect a tank to use direct fire to pierce entrenched positions over rough terrain. If a tank is out looking to hunt another tank, it will most certainly not perform well

@froschreiniger2639

8 ай бұрын

Tank vs tank is very badass and the highest level of tank combat, the real deal, a proper fight.

Hello Redeffect. would you like analysis about the newest video on battlefield where 1 Russian tank (most likely a T-90M) Vs 5 armored vehicles (maxxpro) + 2 tanks from ukranian.

Hey, RedEffect can you do videos about future tank weaponry

Good vid mate keep it up

Just wanted to quickly say Red Effect, I don't believe the ERA on the back of the T-72 and T-90 are purely intended to cover for if you turn around and drive away, but more likely to try and cover from FPV drones and other such rear attacks given their ever increasing frequency with the added protection incase of turning around as just a small side bonus.

Visually confirmed losses are not all losses. NOT every lost tank is photographed or filmed!!

@haaxeu6501

9 ай бұрын

True but you better believe if Ukraine can take footage of a destroyed T90M they will, and they will release the footage. It's the same with Russia and the Leopards or Bradleys, if the can take a picture and post it they will, and with today's technology and the amount of drones, phones etc taking pictures is very easy.

@treycotter

9 ай бұрын

Yes but how are we supposed to analyse losses of tanks that are not photographed? Lo

@imrekalman9044

9 ай бұрын

Makes me wonder if all deliveries are confirmed, or are there more batches not caught on camera.

In the latest update of the T-90m tank, it received an anti-cumulative factory visor and an electronic warfare system against drones, I think this is the best solution for modern wars.

Being a former soldier in an armoured infantry battalion, i must say its the tactics and traing of the troops which is a huge factor. From what footage have seen, the Russian are abysmal in terms of wepons handling and tactics. If the brits had the T-90 in a Ukraine type scenario I guarantee you we wouldnt have the losses the Russians have had.

Another EXCELLENT video RedEffect! Thank you!

One thing people forget when comparing crew survability of T-90M and Leo2a6 is the fact that Leos have not been exposed to direct ATGM fire all that much. At least compared to T-90M. So while we can clearly see what happens when T-90M gets hit by ATGM, we have no idea how would Leopard2A6 fare against modern ATGMs. Only video of Leopard getting hit by ATGM i have seen is that turkish one getting blown to pieces but that was 2A4 at best and it’s single video that might have been a lucky shot into hull ammo compartment.

@scatterlite2266

9 ай бұрын

There is a video of a leopard getting hit by atgm from the front. Its low res but the tank clearly survives it.

@martinlapin4064

9 ай бұрын

@@scatterlite2266 Yep, there are for sure few videos out there, but not enough to make any conclusions. Though i do believe that leo2 is very resilient tank.

@trololoev

9 ай бұрын

Leo2 being hit by ATGM is Syria and lost dozen tanks in one day, because additional ammo can be hit easily even from the front

@kruppclass613

8 ай бұрын

​@@trololoevThe TOW has a massive warhead which is common in syria, that's why there are so many lost Leopard 2 variants

@SpinoDude88

7 ай бұрын

Especially top attack ATGMS which the leo has probably never been exposed to cuz there used by their allies, but the T-90M is and a lot of them too.

Hey redeffect what do you recommend for someone wants to know about tanks from detail to detail ?

@burningphoneix

9 ай бұрын

Depends on what tank you want to know about.

@saudisoviet702

9 ай бұрын

​​@@burningphoneixlike I said detail from detail like from the ground up protection, fire power, Armament, Mobility like everything in a tank because in the future l'm thinking about to design my own tank design

3:08 Indeed the emperor protecs brother.

One thing that's interesting is that western tanks and Russian tanks seem equally vulnerable to mines and ATGMs, so it seems like the Russian doctrine of making lighter, cheaper tanks in larger numbers is better in this environment where losses are expected.

@captainhellhound7451

7 ай бұрын

Except you can’t replace the crew. NATO tanks are heavily focused on survival of the crew. Russian tanks, as are known, aren’t focused on crew survival. In all likely hood if they get penned (they do) they are gonna lose multiple crew. NATO tanks usually will have the crew live with injuries. Yet the skill they’ve learned is so extremely hard to learn that a new tank is cheaper.

@definitelyfrank9341

6 ай бұрын

@@captainhellhound7451 I'll bet you my dignity that you have nothing to suggest that in this era of combat, NATO tanks have higher chances of the crew surviving than a Russian T-90M. I'm serious. There's quite literally nothing to substantiate your claim. Dead NATO tanks look just as dead as dead T-90Ms; turrets blown off, charred-black exteriors, fire and smoke shooting out of tiny cracks in the body, etc.

@KonradvonHotzendorf

4 ай бұрын

Comrades joining the Space Program

Interesting video. Nevertheless the whole analyze regarding production capacity is based on considering all the batch produced have been announced and recorded when delivered... which is imho, very unlikely.

3:04 How much RHA does the blessing add and what other bonuses does it have?

@trololoev

9 ай бұрын

pray at soul of machine

Less t90m have been destroyed in the entire war than leo 2 in just 2 months lol

@trololoev

9 ай бұрын

less t-90 was lost in Syria in 6 years that leopards in one day (or similar numbers)

@ThorSuzuki1

9 ай бұрын

You didnt watch the video?

Last week Shoigu visited the production plant again and the plant manager said that they solved their production issue and they can expect to see more T-90s and bmp3s being produced

@rick7424

9 ай бұрын

Source?

@crazymachinima1

9 ай бұрын

Of course the plant manager said that. Admitting otherwise would lose him his job.

@treycotter

9 ай бұрын

Well I certainly wouldn’t expect him to say he cant produce them

@FelipeCH-fn7sc

9 ай бұрын

And wasn't there news that they we're stopping BMP-3 production to focus on BMP-2s? The FAR worst ifv in every aspect?

@prfwrx2497

9 ай бұрын

Well, if the thermals are capping production rates, then 5 extra T90Ms with sensors of a T72B for every 1 T90M that is up to spec is better than no tank extra at all.

"The Emperor Protects" Holy shit, that's where my mind went too. Ridiculous and sad

@cdgncgn

9 ай бұрын

why sad ?

@jakeg3733

9 ай бұрын

@@cdgncgn Because while I am a huge WH40k fan, it depicts a degraded, oppressive, and backwards human civilization. I mean the lore was deliberately written to be a tragedy. In 5000 years we went from arguably the most advanced species in the galaxy to have existed for millions of years, to a bunch of ignorant religious zealots that cower in the face of even the slightest technological advancement or change. On the verge of extinction no less, and The Emperor ended up creating this mess, despite noble intentions and incredible effort, precisely because he tried to avoid it. It's as sad as it is compelling 40k is probably the truest franchise to human nature I've ever encountered, so when I see a connection drawn between something in the real world and that universe, my heart kind of sinks. I love playing the games and reading the books but I'd never want to actually live in that world. And the connection the video made, while funny, was also pretty spot on... and it's costing young men their lives

@trololoev

9 ай бұрын

@@jakeg3733 war is always sad, but in WH it help, so why risk and not bless?

How do you flip a tank?

All this tech but still a 4kmh reverse

@user-yd6ft9ko3o

9 ай бұрын

15 km/h. : )

@Joaquin546

9 ай бұрын

@@user-yd6ft9ko3oI doubt that greatly

@trololoev

9 ай бұрын

@@Joaquin546 google yourself

Russia knocked out more leopards in a couple weeks than ukraine knocked out T90s in 16 months? 😢

@AaronThePony

9 ай бұрын

Nope, Looks like about 11 Leopards knocked out and 26 T-90Ms currently. Though that's changing every day. Numbers as of 7-25-23, Also as he pointed out not all the T-90s or Leo2s listed are destroyed and many are probably recoverable. 16-18 T-90Ms definitely destroyed and 4 Leopard 2s definitely destroyed are the "Solid" numbers we have. You really should just watch the video, he goes over this.

@lanceb7288

9 ай бұрын

@@AaronThePony any proof of ukrainians recovering a leopard from a pre sighted, continually observed, artillery/drone trap minefield? I mean I could see this still being extremely difficult if they were advancing. But a couple leopards and a few Bradley's just sitting there in a minefield in the gray zone with the Russians just waiting patiently?

@pjdu5yifutd

9 ай бұрын

@@AaronThePony 26 ? source ?

@X-jn87ybt

9 ай бұрын

@@pjdu5yifutdTrust in LGBTQ west bro

@hbalint1000

9 ай бұрын

​​​@@X-jn87ybtand in porn-and-prostitution-addled Russia too, bro

Ukraine uses the T series tanks much better than Russia even with older models

@user-uw1ij4jw2l

9 ай бұрын

Bruh

@Joaquin546

9 ай бұрын

I doubt that a t72 could preform any worse than what Russias been trying.

@trololoev

9 ай бұрын

and Ukraine lost most of their tanks while Russia still have it

@Joaquin546

9 ай бұрын

@@trololoev I doubt that heavily comes from anywhere but "source trust me bro".

Its a damn good tank

It’s still a tank so artillery and anti tank can kill with ease like any other tank leopards challengers and Abrams it’s just tactics the commanders use which make these deadly

@KashtanGreg

9 ай бұрын

depends whether you get a second/third chance or not, after being hit. The T90M will be having higher chances at surviving a tandem/artillery hits, thanks to all-side heavy era coverage

@Rono99

9 ай бұрын

@@KashtanGreg😂arty is a no chance to live round

@Rono99

9 ай бұрын

@@KashtanGreg😂arty is a no chance to live round

@KashtanGreg

9 ай бұрын

​@@Rono99 its possible, Putin even praised the T90M in one of his interviews, saying the tank survived a direct hit of the artillery, and it simply drove away like nothing happened.

@Rono99

9 ай бұрын

@@KashtanGreg i don't know why it posted the same thing twice, any way back to the arty thing , no i need video proof to see a tank live an arty round

Its such a shame russians dont add those reverse gears, cuz I LOVE how Tseries(72,80,90) tanks look. And ofc different ammo storage solution would be cool. Ahh, I can dream...

@vladimirnikolskiy

9 ай бұрын

In fact, now a new transmission is being installed on the T-90M, the reverse speed of which has been increased to 14 km/h.

@taelorpickel2830

9 ай бұрын

@@vladimirnikolskiy Source?

@ThorSuzuki1

9 ай бұрын

@@vladimirnikolskiy Damn, that's almost half of western tanks reverse speed!

Fr so many people are so quick to scream „Destroyed“ when the tank has literally just been tracked and abandoned and not actually destroyed.

5:50 would the rear and the engine deck be strong enough to survive Relikt intercepting the incoming warhead? Considering K-1 has been cracking BMP-1s on exploding... Wouldn't this hit be likely to damage the engine anyways? I suppose the damage would be more minor and would allow the tank to get to at least some safety.

@trololoev

9 ай бұрын

relikt better that K-5, so i think it possible, especially against drones

Russian TV showed a new model of the lancet, for group blows

If your a Russian tank commander would you rather have 1 modernised and expensive T-90M or a group of old cheap T-62/T-64's equipped with thermals,range finders and good ERA ? But keep in mind that all of the tanks mentioned above are not immune to artillery,ATGM's,mines...ect and Ukrainian tanks apart from the westren made ones lack better sights

@user-sw7ry5kh6b

9 ай бұрын

Russia doesnt use t 64, and uses t 62 as small range artillery

@dimakalashnikov6866

9 ай бұрын

@@user-sw7ry5kh6bRussia uses T64 tank removed from storage or captured by Ukrainian,besides according to intelligence ,Russia had more that 2000 T64 tanks in stock

@user-sw7ry5kh6b

9 ай бұрын

@@dimakalashnikov6866 no it doesnt

T-90M is good stuff, but with poor combined arms tactics it´s just another tank waiting for an artillery strike, a drone dropping something, a guided missile or a landmine in the middle of a field. So basically a T-90M or even western heavy tanks are pretty fucked.

Can you do a video on the T-80 BVM please

@RedEffect The video is great, as allways. Just change the name of the video. You are saying nothing about the performance of the tank in Ukraine :D

@alexnderrrthewoke4479

9 ай бұрын

Exactly he just doing dance salad politics.

@subjectc7505

9 ай бұрын

Because the Ukraine bots are gonna be crying

@___KpuTuK___

9 ай бұрын

Украина не производит на данный момент танки. Может что-нибудь ремонтирует, но не делает новые