Imortant Notes from our Audience The Community is great here. 1) "Qasim Mir" It’s important to note regarding driving is that the steering is geared. Meaning with each gear there is a different turn radius, so if you want to do a tight turn you must change down a few gears to be able to do it. Another thing is the steering tillers only control where the front of the tank is pointing. Meaning, if going ahead and you want to turn right, you must ‘come right stick’ pulling the right lever, but, if you’re reversing and you want to turn right you must ‘come left stick’ and pull the left lever. It would be good to touch on the tank’s suspension. Unlike other NATO tanks using torsion bars, Challenger 2 uses hydro pneumatic suspension. The British don’t like suspension that is mounted inside the hull on MBTs so you will never find a British tank with torsion bars. Before on Centurion and Chieftain they had Horstmann suspension. Challenger introduced the outside mounted hydro pneumatic which was easy to service but also performs better at springing and dampening than torsion bar. 2) "Qasim Mir" The firing procedure for a Challenger 2 engagement is as follows (as far as I know): Commander or gunner will acquire the the target: ‘A fin, a tank!’ (‘Fin’ means APFSDS) Operator will load the the relevant round Gunner when he’s brought to target by the commander and adjusted aim will shout: ‘ON!’ or ‘ARMED!’ Idk😳 Operator will report: ‘LOADED!’ Gunner will fire: ‘Firing!’💥 When the round hits, gunner will say: ‘Target!’ If the commander is satisfied with the damage he will reply: ‘Target stopped!’ End of engagement.

@muhammedeminkomurcu1040

Жыл бұрын

Hello, when will Turkish subtitles come to your videos. Because there is no Turkish subtitles even in the automatic translation section.

@qasimmir7117

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for sharing my information.

@seha6391

11 ай бұрын

I LOVE IT THIS ARMOR IS STILL CLASSIFIED AND THIS VIDEO IS BULLSHIT IVE SEEN A BROKEN ABRAMS TANK SKIRT And holy SHIT Chalanger is a slow shooter I could load off a round on an Abrams less than a round every 3 seconds

@Xyb3rTeCh

11 ай бұрын

Please also do one content for the South Korean K2 Black Panther. Thanks!

@zhufortheimpaler4041

11 ай бұрын

Short correction here: 1. Challenger 1 still used the same Horstmann Suspension as Chieftain. 2. The shown weight of the different MBT´s and especcially Challenger 2 are false. Challenger 2 without TES (Theater Entry Standard armor addons) weights in 62.5 metric tons, with TES it weights 75-76 metric tons. Leopard 2A7V and M1A2 SEP.V3 weight in at about 66 metric tons. 3. The L30A1 rifled 120mm L/55 gun is exclusively used by the Challenger 2 (L11 rifled 120mm L/55 gun is the predecessor on Challenger 1 and Chieftain). No other NATO partner uses this gun. Leopard 2, M1 Abrams and Ariete use variants of the RH120 smoothbore 120x570mm L/44 or L/55 gun, Leclerc uses the GIAT CN-26/52 gun, a 120x570mm smoothbore gun with 52 caliber lengths. 4. The Enforcer RWS is not regularly mounted on Challenger 2, even in TES configuration. This was added for the "Street Warrior" upgrade for urban combat. Only one Squadron was fitted out like this. 5. Black Knight, aswell as the other LEP Prototypes were in the end not procured and canceled. The described Challenger 2 would not be used in reality, the regular Challenger 2 does not feature a RWS nor an APS system. 6. The Incident where a Challenger 2 was hit by a Milan ATGM, the Milan used was a Milan 1 ATGM from 1972, wich was sold to Irak in 1982-83 by france. The Milan 1 ATGM had a single HEAT Warhead with about 350mm RHAe Penetration. This was indicently less penetration capability than the RPG-7WN and RPG-7WR used by iraki forces (wich had about 500-700mm RHAe penetration) This is btw not an example of exceptional survivability. If you throw a waterballoon at someone and another one filled with solid ice at another person, you wouldnt say that the person hit with the normal waterballoon is exceptionally tough because he can take the hit. CR2 is a late 1980´s design with armor thickness representing that. 350mm HEAT Penetration wont penetrate the frontal armor and would likely struggle with the side armor too. Similarly the RPG´s have 500-600mm penetration, that wont do much to the front, at the side this would also be likely not enough to penetrate. This would be also the case for Leopard 2A5 and later versions aswell as M1A2 Abrams versions. Other, more modern ATGM and RPG´s, like 9K135 Kornet ATGM with estimated 1200mm Tandem HEAT Warhead would seriously threaten Challenger 2, as it did with Leopard 2 and M1. 7. one also has to mention that the steering tiller system is quite outdated and anachronistic on a vehicle that entered service in 1998, while basicly all other NATO MBT´s from 1978 onwards used steeringwheels and more user friendly controls. 8. in comparison to other NATO MBT´s the Engine of CR2 is quite underpowered and both offroad and on road topspeed of CR2 is about 10-15km/h slower than the competition in both areas. 9. Major Con: Neither Ammunition nor Spareparts are in production for the last 10+ years, the Vehicle itself has basicly no export and is out of production since 2006. This turns the Cr2 into a logistical trap

You miss the most imprtant part, the very core and soul of this tank and all british tanks, the tactical tea maker.

@jac627

11 ай бұрын

That tea reference is so hackneyed

@SeahamV2

11 ай бұрын

Chally of the woods approves.

@mkvenner2

11 ай бұрын

The tactical tea maker was in the Challenger 1. The Challenger 2 has a boil water unit that can do more than make tea but is mostly just used for tea

@davidbridge5652

11 ай бұрын

As an English man I would be offended if it didnt have one

@SeahamV2

11 ай бұрын

@@davidbridge5652 I can tea bag you if you want?.....

One of the few channels which actually point out its 3 part ammo....Well done.

@Aitelly

11 ай бұрын

Thank You

@Maurizio4672

8 ай бұрын

tu saresti il nobile Staminchia?

@Gu1s

5 күн бұрын

Кто-то этого не знает😂😂😂?

In reality, in Ukraine they are kept at the behind the lines on demand of the British, the front is "not safe enough" I wonder what's the point for sending them.

@Zz_Mike-Hawk_zZ

7 ай бұрын

Now we know why.

@overdrivelzma.9219

7 ай бұрын

@zz_mike-hawk_zz True challenger ii lost undefeated in Ukraine against a powerful atgm, only the Abraham m1a2 remains to be seen in action and performance.

@Zz_Mike-Hawk_zZ

7 ай бұрын

@@overdrivelzma.9219 I have made a video about it, it you want to check it out.

@stanmil5495

28 күн бұрын

Send them back then, talk about biting the hand that feeds you

Please Subscribe 🤘

@mathijeba5375

Жыл бұрын

Ok

@mathijeba5375

Жыл бұрын

How does a mig 29 work plzz

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

@@mathijeba5375 Ok after we are done with the T90 Russian tank Autoloader Mechanism

@nuclearwarhead9338

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly please make a video explaining the Fly-By-Wire for unstable aircrafts.

@johaneslerius9943

Жыл бұрын

Oke dokey👍👍👍😁😁😁

Challenger 2 is lovely and is the most beautiful MBT in the world

@qasimmir7117

Жыл бұрын

Indeed she is.

@user-xr5mj4fc7g

11 ай бұрын

Да , красивый...Только поэтому на него и соблазнилась одна страна в мире , кроме Англии.

@pieterveenders9793

Ай бұрын

After the Leopard she's definitely one of the most beautiful.

It’s important to note regarding driving is that the steering is geared. Meaning with each gear there is a different turn radius, so if you want to do a tight turn you must change down a few gears to be able to do it. Another thing is the steering tillers only control where the front of the tank is pointing. Meaning, if going ahead and you want to turn right, you must ‘come right stick’ pulling the right lever, but, if you’re reversing and you want to turn right you must ‘come left stick’ and pull the left lever. It would be good to touch on the tank’s suspension. Unlike other NATO tanks using torsion bars, Challenger 2 uses hydro pneumatic suspension. The British don’t like suspension that is mounted inside the hull on MBTs so you will never find a British tank with torsion bars. Before on Centurion and Chieftain they had Horstmann suspension. Challenger introduced the outside mounted hydro pneumatic which was easy to service but also performs better at springing and dampening than torsion bar.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the beautifully written notes. Learned a lot today

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

We have Credited you for this insightful comment.

@danhodson7187

11 ай бұрын

HAS to have good suspension or the crew might spill their cuppa!

@qasimmir7117

11 ай бұрын

@@danhodson7187 Indeed. Tea is vital for victory.☕️

@realitygaming4088

10 ай бұрын

Great read. My dad spent his career transporting challengers and other vehicles nice to have a good insight into it all.

First Challenger was destroyed today

It runs on TEA 😂

I always wondered how challenger was different from abrams you hear all the time about abrams blow out panel or how it drives. These vids are great very informative and gets straight to the point of how the tanks works that can’t get from a google search easily. I look forward to all the future vids.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Next Russian T90M Autoloader

@deven6518

Жыл бұрын

Can't get from a Google search easily? Lol

@zulfanirich7594

9 ай бұрын

still a coward in ukraine 😂😂

@Maurizio4672

8 ай бұрын

ora hai capito perchè gli abrams bruciano che è una meraviglia?

Challenger 2 just came out on top of a recent NATO exercise beating Leopards and Abrams etc

@raf9826

11 ай бұрын

Yes this was really impressive, I wonder how great the Challenger 3 will turn out to be if they did this well with the Chally 2.

@Robin-sf3gk

10 ай бұрын

Why is nobody mentioning the french Leclerc here?

@overdrivelzma.9219

7 ай бұрын

In the real war with a regular and competent army challenger lost undefeated in Ukraine by the employment of a laser guide ATGM.

You forgot it's most important feature, the water boiler so you can have a nice cup of tea after the battle.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Yes. We thought everyone knew about it

@moongoose2095

11 ай бұрын

Kettle you silly billy

@XIXjlo

11 ай бұрын

@@moongoose2095 boiler vessel

@TheJoyofSix

11 ай бұрын

During the battle, dear boy

So basically, they designed this tank all in defend stat, the attack is based on the elite crews from British

Challenger 2 Tank How it Works: It's on the side of the road. It burns very much. It smokes a lot.

@1maico1

7 ай бұрын

Hit a mine. The crew bailed and sometime later it took a hit from a Kornet. Any tracked vehicle will be immobilized by ATMs. It was noticeable there were no armour modules fitted, they have not been supplied to Ukraine.

@overdrivelzma.9219

7 ай бұрын

@1maico1 The Kornet is very powerful drill 1200 mm of composite armour, it would also have drilled the armour module.

Amazing what engineers can achieve when it comes to weaponry 💥

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

yes

@linuxuberuser

Жыл бұрын

Imagine if engineers were hired to build space ships that ran on rocket-less propulsion. It's already been done.

@komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257

10 ай бұрын

​@@Aitelly 2:20 The Soviets made their bridge capacity 45 tons so that when western tanks passed, the bridge would immediately collapse

Wow! What an amazing machine. Excellent video.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment

The Mk 4 was not just the first British Tank, it was the first Tank anywhere. To keep them secret before they were first used in World War One they were described as "Mobile Water Tanks", or just "Tanks". The name stuck. 😃

I'm glad you're talking about the Challenger 2 here and not the "Challenger 3". The UK government isn't fooling anyone that what is merely upgrade suite is a new tank.

@k-ron7403

11 ай бұрын

Well it’s an entirely new turret, gun, firing system, self defence system, new armour and new engine. So i would hardly call it a light upgrade. It will do nicely and certainly better than anything potential foes have. Just need more of them

@1maico1

7 ай бұрын

The only thing the same between the II and III is the chassis. The gun is switching to smoothbore.

@jpracing893

4 ай бұрын

@@1maico1 Even then it's been changed, the lower Glacis has been up armoured on a chassis level not just add-on, the tank uses 3rd Gen Chobham called Farnham and has add-on armour like the Challenger 2 TES had called EPSOM which is upgraded from current standards (This is how we'd send tanks into battle with the add-on armour) So the Chassis has had a lot of work done, not forgetting APS has been confirmed, specifically Trophy.

This video is extremely helpful for someone that wants to 3D model a game ready tank with an Interior and physicalized damage. Thanks for this video.

to know how it work you just have to ask on war thunder forums and wait until someone give you classified document

@kallanr360

11 ай бұрын

Underrated comment.

Love this video! Great detail and information. Can’t wait to see if you have videos on other MBTs after I finish this!

the challenger 2 just won a NATO tank competition last week. leopard came 2nd and abrams 3rd

@zulfanirich7594

9 ай бұрын

still a coward in ukraine 😂😂

@chrisyoung9653

9 ай бұрын

@@zulfanirich7594 no need to use the good tanks yet. any old tank will do against poor wee russia and their egg cartons🤣🤣🤣

@overdrivelzma.9219

7 ай бұрын

@chrisyoung9653 Already tested it against a professional army, Challenger lost the undefeated were 2 units lost out of 10, I don't think UK will give him more units.

@chrisyoung9653

7 ай бұрын

@@overdrivelzma.9219 no they were only given so Germany would send leopard 2s. Worked great

@overdrivelzma.9219

7 ай бұрын

@chrisyoung9653 It only remains the Abraham M1A2 to make their combat debut in Europe and see if they better withstand a high intensity war, I think France will never send its Leclercs.

the up armoured variant you show is actually pushing 85 tonnes

@paulmatthews2175

11 ай бұрын

no it isn't, the full TES version is 72 tonnes

Such a good tank. One of the best you can have

A positive you failed to mention is the suspension that allows better cross country performance than its competitors even with higher power engines. Coupled with easier repair to the external suspension units when damaged in combat, whereas battle damaged welded torsion bars in the Leopards and Abrams require back to base, torsion bar torch-cutting, disassembly, removal and repair.

The combat weight of the Challenger is is actually 75 metric tonnes. The training weight of the tank is the standard 63 tonnes. For comparison, the combat weight of the M1A2 Abrams with TUSK is 68 metric tonnes.

Stumbled upon the video. Now hooked. Excellent work!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Awesome of you thanks 🙏

Thanks! I've been having trouble firing my Challenger tank

Beautifully animated 🔥

really useful. I am about to break into an armored division's HQ and steal a tank and this is going to be helpful. appreciate the info!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

thanks

@Grimnir_x

11 ай бұрын

Can you grab me one while you're there?

I am very happy to see that your video quality is developing. Hope you get more subscribers soon . ❤ from 🇮🇳.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Better Video as we try to recruit more people

I wish I discovered this channel earlier. Every time there is a country show I never get to go in the challenger because the queue is too long. So it is nice to know how the internals, and periscope work etc

"Its not how it works Its how it burns" -Chadimir Poutine 2023

Chobham armour = developed by DERA ( Defence Evaluation Research Agency) British army department in a village called Chobham in Surrey south east of England. I lived there for 15 years.

@yurkofess3825

5 ай бұрын

They call "Chobham" most composite NERA armour variants, including non-British. Actually, part of Challenger2 armor plating and APS - made in Israel.

Remarkable work. Excellent!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍

My previous favorite was the L2 A7, but I would take this anyday.

Great video, fantastic animation, top notch narrative.

Your videos never fail to amaze me

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍

Bro Can you make a detailed video like this on a apc(armored personal carrier) maybe Boxer

My favourite tank,beautiful

"....the Mark IV. The first battle-tested tank made by British engineers......". In fact the first tank made by anyone anywhere. Called a "tank" because that was the code word for it while under development and the name stuck.

@nordic0815

11 ай бұрын

Spot on… The tank was originally named land ship by British Military in WW1. The name "tank" was initially a code name to maintain secrecy and disguise its true purpose by making it appear to be a water transport vehicle for bringing water to the troops at the front line. Extra Facts: Challenger 2 (CR2) tank can also set a smoke screen by the injection of diesel fuel into the engine exhausts. The secret weapon of any British Armoured Vehicle BV. A boiling vessel (BV) is a water heating system fitted to British armoured fighting vehicles that permits the crew to heat water and cook food by drawing power from the vehicle electrical supply. It is often referred to by crewmembers as "the most important piece of equipment in a British armoured vehicle".

This series is great

Next level video. Good job!

This channel is exactly what I’ve been looking for. Thanks 👍

@loadapish

11 ай бұрын

U plannin on stealing a tank?

@JohnMcMahon.

11 ай бұрын

@@loadapish 😊

So, we have absolutely no idea what its Dorchester armour comprises off. The only reference we have is we know what Burlington arrays No.1 to 4 looked like, which were in fact bulging plate technology using plastic and steel. However, that technology was patented in 1962 and Dorchester is a much newer and advanced development from the Burlington arrays and like how the Germans dropped the bulging plate armour design in their B-Tech armours and started using ceramics in newer armours in C-Tech and the US went with using depleted Uranium in some way with is HAP and NGAP armour over the bulging plate armours in its early BRL armours, it's likely Dorchester has moved onto incorporating more advanced material arrays. However, despite what most people say, there is absolutely no available information that gives us an idea of what Dorchester is made off. I'd be lying to say it didn't bug me to see the composite armour animated right in the front within the 100mm steel plate armour but I know its just for education purposes.

Well done, for sure.

Fantastic! Have just discovered AiTelly channel. It's absolutely great, with so much interesting and informative engineering and technical detail. But - vitally - you explain everything clearly for mechanical thickos like me.

Excellent visualization

Dont forget the brew making facilities 🍵 😭 lol 😂

@awatt

11 ай бұрын

☕

Amazing animations! Very informative! If you guys don't mind leaving references to the litarature on which you are basing your work, that would be fantatistic!

Could be worth to mention that one of the cons is the rifling of the gun, which slows down the sabbot rounds (so less penetration power) but are neccesary for HESH rounds which are less effective because of explosive reactive armor. I think they are considering going smooth bore for their next challenger version.

great job bro👌 thank you 👍

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Always Welcome

I can now operate the tank thank you aitelly

Great video,thank you.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Welcome

Thank you to the channel, interesting information) Thank you to Great Britain for helping in the fight against aggression!

Great as usual

@Aitelly

11 ай бұрын

thanks

no idea how youtube got this suggestion right! it only took 15 or so years for their algorithm lord to figure out what i want to watch !LOL great channel , ill probably watch all your videos in a week!

If memory serves me correctly, the safety switch on the GCP does not isolate the firing circuit it only isolates the Gun Control Equipment ie. turret movement, same for the Commanders Safety switch. The Loaders Control Panel Safety switch does however isolate the Firing Circuit and the GCE.

Nice video! Thanks!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Always welcome

Another detail, with a full system the gunner does not correct for wind and elevation. Elevation is calculated at the point of lasing and acquiring the range to the target. Windage is calculated via data from the MET sensor mounted on top of the turret. Only when all systems have failed does the gunner have to resort to manual correction. Great video though, brought back memories. 👍

Wow thanks another excellent video..... 👍 Mark from UK..... The home of the challenger 2

I am Russian, and I can barely speak English. Much less be polite. First of all, thank you very much. 1. The coaxial chain gun looks much simpler, single barrel. It has features important for a close tank. 2. English tanks are one of the narrowest today. Even in comparison with the Soviet ones. The thing about railroad overpasses. Some decisions of this tank have to do with the width. 3. The hydraulic automatic transmission does not disengage the clutch, but reduces the power of one of the tracks. 4. The Challenger can still fire at a large downward lean angle, which increases its heavy turret. It has relatively high ground clearance, a smooth bottom, and mine protection. This, too, increases the height. 5. The suspension of this tank is unusual: compact and adjustable (located on sides, not on the bottom, which reduces the height of the tank). That is why the tank can withstand unprecedented overloading of the hinged protection. 6. The inclined multilayer armor barrier refracts (as in optics) the shock front of the penetrator many times. This leads to its defocusing (as in optics). In practice it looks like the penetrator is crumbled, by dissipating the energy to fluctuate the layers.

@Aitelly

11 ай бұрын

@ Ernest Awesome point of view

@Ernest-jr

11 ай бұрын

@@Aitelly I was trying to present facts, not opinions. There are too many opinions around.

@robertpatrick3350

11 ай бұрын

Point 5 the suspension system has inspired the new South Korean tanks and it will become more prevalent. Point 4 British tank designers have long valued being able to have a large depression angle, this has proved extremely valuable to them in many conflicts eg Korea and to the Israeli’s where the Syrian forces were at a significant disadvantage.

@kallanr360

11 ай бұрын

"I can barely speak English" delivers a seminar of information on the tank concisely. Please never learn English properly, you will make us look bad.

Being a loader in a tank crew sucks. So you don't have any special features, all you have to do is load the right ammo quickly. When your tank is in battle, you are the most important member of the crew, but unfortunately you are never remembered. In my country's war 60 years ago, a T-34 crossed incredibly steep mountains and got behind our opponent and cornered him. Members of the tank crew were declared heroes, but the presence of the crew member who served as a loader was not mentioned in the monument built for them. If it weren't for him, the tank wouldn't even be able to fire, but it was forgotten. Likewise, this is happening not only in us, but all over the world. I heard that crew members operating Abrams tanks in the Middle East were fighting each other to avoid taking the Loader role.

Amazing animation ❤

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 🙏

Amazing.

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍

Thanks for great video

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Always welcome

Finally, the challenger 2 !

@overdrivelzma.9219

7 ай бұрын

It's a pity that Challenger II lost the undefeated in Ukraine to a semi-professional regular army.

Your channel is great

Excellent video

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 🙏👍

Great work as always! Dang, that tank is a beast! Watching your videos,I'm gaining a bit of knowledge, you know what they say about that.

Very cool video

This video was awesome thank you for your hard work ❤

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

Awesome Guys

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Cosmic

great content❤❤

@Aitelly

11 ай бұрын

Thanks

Great video well done

@Aitelly

11 ай бұрын

Thanks

Im obsessed to your channel.

@Aitelly

9 ай бұрын

we love you Guys so much. Thanks!

Things I learned today: the Brits basically have to put some sort of a rifle clip to ignite the Challenger 2´s main gun 😄 Yeah looking forward for the T-90M animation 👌

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

🙏 thanks 👍

@Kohagaan

Жыл бұрын

And the Leclerc tank animation too 👍

@DH.2016

11 ай бұрын

Amazing to think that the Chally's main gun shares, in effect, a 3 component ammo system with the likes of a rifled musket in the American Civil War some 130 years earlier with the latter's ammo consisting of a cartridge with powder, a Minie ball and a percussion cap.

@kizzyp2735

11 ай бұрын

@@DH.2016 ...the reality is though its no slower than single piece tank ammo.

As much as I love Tanks, I love me some Mighty-Mo! Hope to see some ships!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Coming soon after we are done with Autoloader

awesome!

@Aitelly

6 ай бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

I love how the tank's maid gun reminiscent the 18th century cannon.

The upgrades you mentioned will be on Challenger 3, Dorchester armour, 1500hp engine, Triumph protection system, better third gen optics and the new Rhine metal 120mm smooth bore gun.

Please do other lesser known tanks like Oplot, Al Khalid etc, SR-72 etc.

Thanks!

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thank You so much. We have also credited your name in our last Video

@MohammadAdliadlious

Жыл бұрын

@@Aitelly thanks, I really appreciate that

Great 👍 videos

Additional pro: you can make tea inside the tank

What a great video you have done here very easy how you explain information in this video great video graphics love it. Just to let you know, not long ago, the USA wanted this classified armour for the USA tank's so both the uk and us did a deal to share the technology as the uk got some technology on the us submarine technology so ONLY the USA and UK are the only tank's to have this armour.

@Aitelly

11 ай бұрын

Thanks for the support and Feedback notes

@user-dl3nc4jx7k

11 ай бұрын

you are writing absolute nonsense.firstly, the world's first tank with composite armor was built in the USSR, the T-64.Secondly, the spaced armor in the forehead of the tower of several dozen armor plates with air gaskets and other materials is not a privilege of the USA and England.This has been done on the T-90 in Russia since the 90s

@gonzomuse

11 ай бұрын

@@user-dl3nc4jx7k He didn't say "spaced" armour or "composite" armour. He was referring to Chobham armour specifically, which was used on the Challenger 1 and shared with the US for the M1A1. Dorchester is the upgraded Chobham variant on CH2, while the Americans developed their own variant for the M1A2.

Very good technical animation

I like the commander and gunner animation. They looked more alive than other videos

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks- we try our best

That's very very informative

@Aitelly

9 ай бұрын

Thanks 🙏👍

What is the maximum firing rate (rounds per minute) of the main gun? How much pressure do the tracks exert on the ground? How do these parameters compare to other main battle tanks?

@TheVonJagger

11 ай бұрын

8 rounds in 42 seconds I think is the record.

👨‍💻Excelente una vez mas .tienes mis saludos .⬜🟦🟥 👏👏👏

this is really nice video ,please more

@Aitelly

9 ай бұрын

But we did not get any views 😔

Good job guys, please Leclerc tank !

No one has ever destoryed a Challenger 2. I wonder if Russia can be the first to destory a Challeneger 2 in battle. I hope this is not the case but if it is, It shows the level of skill the british army have when using the Challenger 2

@hushpuppykl

11 ай бұрын

It has been … by another Challenger 2, friendly fire 😬

@Troll73778

11 ай бұрын

@@hushpuppykl only the British have destroyed one

@JC-gl7ee

10 ай бұрын

It’ll likely happen, they’ve never been fighting a proper power before. Yes Iraq was hairy but it wasn’t a superpower, Ruzzia for their faults is. They have the capability

@Robin-sf3gk

10 ай бұрын

But in how many battles has it been yet compared to the Abrahams, Leclerc and Leopard?

@facts9538

10 ай бұрын

@@Robin-sf3gk Does the fact it hasn't been destoryed bother you? Just wondering why you take my comment ( about a single tank ) and turn it into your own so you can compare. I don't know how many battles, i dont think any goverment is going to tell us the true number. But enough to known it's the best performing tank in Nato. But seeing as you wanted to compare tanks. Can you name a single tank from any other country that has in a single battle been hit with 15+ RPG's plus bullet, granades ect And still drove away? I don't know how many battle i dont think any goverment is going to tell us the true number. But enough to known as the best performing tank in Nato.

They really improved so much

please make a video on how to control and use drones like MQ-9, shaheed, and other drones just like you tell us in this video in detail

should been comparing the T80s which were the main heavy tanks. the T72s and T90s were the medium tanks but heavy fire power

Very good

@Aitelly

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍

the laid back driver position in the forward hull of the Challenger 2 needs a proper steering wheel, instead of two levers . . . the hydro-pneumatic suspension in the Challenger 2 can be upgraded with a additional variable coil spring setup that'll function in tandem with the tank's torsion bar suspension . . . the Challenger 3 could seriously do with a lightweight hull made of anti-ballistic high strength steel alloys & lithium composites . . . this should limit the overall mass (without the add on Chobam® armour & ERA) of the tank to less than 46.35 ton . . . one piece pressed/moulded hull sections is another weight saving feature . . . the 360° deg rotating manned turret needs to be lighter as well . . . a turbocharged 20.0 in-line-8 & a iSmartHYBRId® power pack . . . the turret top mounted 360° deg rotating Enforcer RWS next to the gunner's could be armed with a 25 MM GAU-12/U six-barrel rotary cannon & the standard 0.50 Cal . . .

Mistake on 1:54. T-72 is a russian tank (T-90 prototype) which is produced on Urals manufactories and is presented in a very small amount in the ua forces, while the main ukrainian army tank is T-64 made in Kharkov.

@overdrivelzma.9219

7 ай бұрын

T 90M Provy3 vs T 84 Oplot. This encounter will never happen Ukraine does not send its oplot to the front only owns 10 units.