I’d still go with a Jeep Rubicon…

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

100%. Us too!

@DUNEATV

4 ай бұрын

@@Built2Wander 🍻

@OmarRodriguez-ox4ey

4 ай бұрын

Love my 392! There is no Replacement for it.

@luisfernando5998

3 ай бұрын

Dumb jeep fans

We need a real comparison video. Have the bronco follow your 392. Then have the 392 follow the Bronco and see if you both either not make it or make it. That’s how you’ll truly see which one can do what and which one can’t do what.

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

It would be ideal to have a stock version of each. Maybe we can do that at some point!

where the hell is the 392 footage?

For my use I’d take the 392. Solid axle front, relatively simple V8, and the cheaper cost to modify plus it takes up less real estate on and off road. For the trails I enjoy, even my JKU sometimes feels annoyingly large, broncos are school buses in comparison.

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

Good feedback. I don’t disagree!

Nothing a tune wouldn’t help. The ecoboost is no joke.

Those Bronco Raptor fender flares… 🤢🤮

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

Couldn’t agree more 😂

@DUNEATV

4 ай бұрын

When I first saw that in a photograph when they were new, I thought they built some temporary fenders just so they could test the vehicle out!

@CraigG21

4 ай бұрын

@@DUNEATV yeah, they look like some cheap/cheesy AutoZone accessory.

@DUNEATV

4 ай бұрын

@@CraigG21 “you bet partner we have those flares on aisle seven”

@j.l.5966

20 күн бұрын

2024 models fixed this with color matched flares. Still badonkadonk but much much improved.

Good video 👍. We have a 392

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

392 for the win!

Granted you get more for your money with a bronco but I bet if ford would have stuffed a v8 in it I would bet ford would have skimmed quite a bit of the extras off. If jeep would have but in a twin turbo v6 then I’m sure it would have been loaded with the same extras as the bronco

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

Great point. I think the 392 is worth the money with the 6.4L HEMI

Jeep wrangler 392 is better

@eniorivera9672

4 ай бұрын

Agree! That's why the Jeep Wrangler still selling better than the Bronco

When he says the wrangler doesn’t come with power seats and the red Jeep he is showing has power seats. Lol

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

I said not until 2024 did they come with power seats. I then showed a 2024 wrangler with power seats as a reference. 👍🏻

The longest Bronco Raptor commercial 🤷‍♂️🤣

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

Hopefully you enjoyed it! Appreciate you taking the time to watch and comment.

Hey brother man! I've got a buddy at work who might want to do some crawling with ya! He was asking me if you've ever done Carnage Canyon in Buena Vista?

Got rid of my 20th anniversary 392 for a Braptor - Brap just hits different but that 392 eng is second to none

Both awesome. Im with the 90% that would not be doing hard core rock crawling, maybe some and would go for the creature comforts and the everday driveability of the bronco raptor. Also bronco raptor just won baja 1000, it's a beast at high speed desert racing, whoops, etc.

The bronco also doesnt have the same community the 392 has and its after market options dwell in comparison to the 392

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

You are right about that. I expect the Bronco to catch up but 100% agree.

Why are you not comparing them side by side? And how the F are you spending $25k on suspension on the 392 and it’s not better than the Braptor… that’s absolute insanity! I’d suggest watching the Trail Militia video for a more comprehensive review. While it’s a bit Bronco favoring, it actually shows both in Rocks in Johnson Valley and in high speed dirt passes. The Bronco is an all around great vehicle, but considering you can get a 392 under MSRP while still paying markup on the Braptor, the 392 is a better deal and can easily be better for less money. For the sake of transparency, I am a 392 owner, I have wheeled both vehicles, and am the 392 driver of the aforementioned Trail Militia video. I have since installed 37” Falken Wildpeak RTs, and have proven it does better in the rocks during Winter4x4Jamboree.

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

The 392 is absolutely better in the rocks. That is one of the points we made. But it’s never going to be as stable at high speeds over a independent front axle

@DUNEATV

4 ай бұрын

I watch that video and the two vehicles do about the same over the rocks. You guys chose. If pushed harder on some of the other trails in Moab, I guarantee you that independent front suspension would not have performed as good as your Jeep, and probably started breaking parts like steering racks and tie rod ends…

@mauriceaucoin1368

4 ай бұрын

@@Built2Wander I have to disagree, I think the 392 and the bronco raptor are what and what on the rocks. I do respect your opinion though. Great content btw.

@mauriceaucoin1368

4 ай бұрын

@@DUNEATV Stock for stock i believe both can break parts rather quickly, however modified its a toss up depending on the budget.

Wrangler 392 all the way

Look at all the triggered Jeep boys 😂 stock for stock, the Bronco Raptor outperforms the 392 in every category besides a drag race. Including rock crawling (because it comes on 37’s stock). Still think you look better in the Jeep, though Collin 😅 Thanks for all the love, brother! Great video review, and looking forward to doing an “unbiased” 392 review on Chasing Dust!

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

Haha everyone is triggered!!

@unclesteff

3 ай бұрын

Nope. Rock crawling is ALSO 392 territory all day- IFS will always lose this one. What good are 37's when you can't keep your wheels on the ground?

The bronco is weak in tie rods and other components! I like the look but wouldn’t ever buy one. The rubicon is my choice by far! Been to Moab, broncos are always being recovered. Lol

@Thatgreenbronco

4 ай бұрын

and you think a stock jeep isn't weak? lol come on dude both have weaknesses from the factory that can easily be addressed with aftermarket parts.

@kurtjensen7930

4 ай бұрын

@@Thatgreenbronco it’s very weak, not worth money! If you don’t believe that, you’ve never researched it at all!

@kurtjensen7930

4 ай бұрын

@@Thatgreenbronco why should you pay 60k and have to add aftermarket parts? To just do a simple trail? Lol

@Thatgreenbronco

4 ай бұрын

@@kurtjensen7930i don’t need to research it…i own one that i offroad and overland with and have yet to have any issues whatsoever. Only thing i did was beefed up the tie rods which cost me 300$. Trust me they all have issues including jeeps.

@kurtjensen7930

4 ай бұрын

@@Thatgreenbronco you don’t really off-road it! Or you would know. I think they look great. Doesn’t mean they can compete. Should have had a solid axle and then they would have been something!

Braptor all day

This is not really comparing apples to apples. Yes they are both offroad vehicles, but they are built for different purposes. Here in the desert, we call Jeeps Trail Snails because they are so slow on the trails.

Jeep is way way tougher, way way more capable, way way easier to work on, way way more long term reliable.

@blakemarchand6650

4 ай бұрын

Thanks for saying what we’re all thinking 👍🇺🇸

@Built2Wander

4 ай бұрын

Agreed!

“If you got the coin to drop” It’s going to be the Jeep. It’s more expensive. Also, you can’t compare the Bronco 6cyl Raptor to the 392. With all due respect, no way. I run 37x13.5x18 KO2s and no need for add lift as you may see. Bronco Raptor is a wannabe Rub 392. Sorry. Otherwise, nice review.

Blah blah blah yeah IFS is super nice over whoops and kicker jumps no one cares. JL392 is also over built and smaller and lighter. JL392 all day they scream America 🇺🇸!!’

Jeeps suck