I had once asked a friend of mine who believed in Karma about how do they account for kids who are born horribly disabled or kids with extremely dire diseases (like kids going through cancer). My friend replied that those kids must have sinned in their previous life. You can justify a lot of crap based on the concept of Karma (like discrimination on the basis of birth as well).

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed. And it seems to be the primary purpose to which the doctrine is put by those who claim to believe it. Always someone else's Karma, never one's own.

@shenoyenterprises

Жыл бұрын

Again "REBIRTH" has it's Origin in the Buddhist Scriptures. According to the Buddha, every moment an emotion rises, and bust, like bubbles in a boiling water. You are born every moment, and You die every moment, and you are born again. If you create Good Thoughts, you'll give birth to More Good Thoughts, which will Make You HAPPY. If you create Bad Thoughts, You will give birth More Bad Thoughts, which will Harm You FIRST.

@YV-2000

11 ай бұрын

​@@shenoyenterprisesok but that must be interpreted in this current life, we are living now. It should not be extrapolated that Buddha believed in the next life, in reincarnation.

@shenoyenterprises

11 ай бұрын

@@YV-2000 That's a Big Myth. "Siddharth Gautama the Buddha" was born in 564BCE(approximately), it's 2500. His language was Pali. Lot of his words are Lost in Translation. Also like the Chinese Whisper things have altered/ interpreted from generation to generation. Many Cultures have adopted the Teachings of "Siddharth Gautama the Buddha" as per the convience of their Culture. The term "Karma" is mostly attributed to Bhagwat Geeta which is intrinsic part. Mahabharata (compiled in 4CE). According to some Historians Bhagwat Geeta was separate book written in 3-2 BCE. It was included in Mahabharata in 4CE.

@YV-2000

11 ай бұрын

@@shenoyenterprises Whatever you wrote in this comment about Buddha I agree. I know lots of Buddha teachings have been lost. You yourself claimed rebirth is the phenomenon talked about in Buddhism. If lots of teachings are lost how are you claiming the fact about rebirth then.

I think it is good that your channel has only a few subscribers. One you are able to make videos like this boldly. Secondly you are able to have discussions with the commenters which always feels so good to the few people who see your videos and take time to engage with them. Quality is always better than Quantity.

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

So nice of you

@slumpsalot

4 ай бұрын

i would prefer him to have more subscribers tho, it not only spreads his opinion to more people but also supports him financially. Also, small bubbles tend to get a small spectrum of people, would be cool to get more ideas contrasting his to really get the full picture.

Wow, just wow. I was not even aware about this line of thinking, that morality is a social/human construct. It surely makes sense!!! Thanks a lot man❤.

Absolutely great explanation...smoothly explained and easy to understand... Agreed with you Vimoh

This is the best atheist channel. There are some Atheist channels where they insult only Hinduism and Hindus but indirectly promote Buddhism.

Deep deep shit. Totally agree. You gave words to my scattered thoughts. Love & peace.

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Kalpit. Not too deep I hope. My aim is to make things accessible and understandable.

@-logic6654

2 жыл бұрын

@@vimoh you’re doing a beautiful work at it. Keep it up! Also those comic posters are dope!

Eagerly waiting.

This is what happens when someone from arts thinks he is master in science😂😂

Man you deserve million subscriber 👍

@Kartik-it2qc

5 ай бұрын

Heere ki kadar sirf johri ko hoti hai

That was a very nice way to think. Very simple but no-one thinks like that. I don't know why.

महाशय आप कर्मा का सिद्धांत हिंदी में भी बनाइये ताकि जिन्हें अंग्रेजी नही आती तो वो इस सिद्धांत को समझ सके धन्यबाद🙏

I respect that title. It says what many refuse to admit for some odd reason. Perhaps because no specific god is named? Eastern religions have been a go-to for many Western religious drop-outs who want something a little less rigid. But, to me, the theory of Karma & reincarnation is just as frightening as any of the rest. Personal or impersonal makes no difference when it comes to god (or any supernatural intelligence that judges, etc.). It actually gets very little attention when you look about online. Atheists tend to address personal gods. So who's dealing with this less defined, but just as potent, material that you've brought up here? Not many at all. Thank you for this upload.

Absolutely brilliant👍👍👍.... What you just said is said by gaudapada in karika... Upanishads doesn't believe in karma either. I read that on ramkrishna mission library. Ashtavakra also says this and also shankara.

We’re projecting an anthropic view upon everything. I know atheists who do the same to nature.(not necessarily consciously)

Very well explained 👍🏼👌🏼👏🏼👍🏼❤️😊

We need more people like you

Theists can't question god.Atheist can.

Atheist is someone who doesn't believe in claims of existence of any god. Does it matter whether the god is personal or not?

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

No. That's the point.

4:58 japan and nordic countries are example that morality has nothing to do with religion or god,, difference is that different relegions give different type of understanding of morality and immortality and by the time religion eventually ends up in blind faith

Buddha believe in ' IMPERMANANCE OF THINGS '

The modern idea of Karma as a moral law is quite new and really is from the influence of post Mahavira Jainism. Older ideas are based on action and causality but early Advaita philosophers already had the idea that the bird flying at the same time as the coconut falling from a tree is a false causality (superstition).

The Concept of Karma pre dates Bhagwat (which was written in 2-300 BCE), its original are found in Buddhist Scriptures 500 BCE. The Original Concept of Karma is very different from the current context. According to Buddha, when a person gets angry, he/she creates so much anger within him/ her it effects him/ her first.

@meghannagvekar60

Жыл бұрын

Yes sir that what it is.,

@meghannagvekar60

Жыл бұрын

@@human_being6969 Yes indeed and practical toothan logic . seed has also effect but blind believing focus on fruit. which is not true always

@hithasrivatsan3940

Жыл бұрын

That's how I understand it too: Karma means consequence. It appeals to one's intuitive thinking, what with the butterfly effect now being a well known concept. I can see the benefit of thinking through long term consequences, but the problem with that is that Karma encourages reductionist thinking. Kind of like The Secret encouraging people to think that if I don't get what I want, I must not be putting enough energy into manifesting it by belief.

@anurag.21_

8 ай бұрын

Wrong.

Sir hindi m bhi veido banaye. Is topic par

Please refer to Jataka Tales by Buddha

2:25 real actions has real consequences. There is nothing like karma as explained in any religious philosophy. But there are actions and reactions.

💯

Chrvaka ka koi saboot nahi hai phir bhi vo nastik darshan hai.

Sir hindi me bhi iss topic ko laiye

I thought the word Atheist meant the person who does not believe in any form of God.

When someone does something bad already is suffering out of ignorance. The fact that someone has a capacity to do something bad I the result of being detached from God. This person is already paying their karma. This person must realise the cause of this suffering and make a choice to set himself free from karma, or keep in the cycle.

Simple and lucid.....Keep it up. Nice one🌹❤️

I'd recommend you to make a collab video with @The Indian Atheist . This is their youtube channels name they made some good videos..

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

I have actually messaged them. Their channel is on a hiatus. When they come back, we will see what can be done.

@kunalkatariya3046

2 жыл бұрын

@@vimoh 👍🏾

@billybutcher6504

2 жыл бұрын

@@vimoh Heyy, talk with Science Journey

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

@@billybutcher6504 Already have

@billybutcher6504

2 жыл бұрын

@@vimoh Seriously???? Please send me the link of that video.

But I thought karma is just cause and effect so karma is real, right?

@vimoh

Жыл бұрын

Justice doesn't exist in nature. It's a function of human society.

If karma is real then why god form the beginning not tell all humans i am the god and follow karma and why he didn't stop other religions and make all people follow karma

Bro...u should write books.

What do you think about the current wave of 'Indic Wingers'. They are claiming that Varnashasram is the best system a society should be based on. At some of their materials(Sangam Talks, Jaipur Dialogues, Rajiv Malhotra) have claimed that Karma. which is one of the basis of deciding your Varna, isn't based on your actions on previous birth, just your actions on current birth.

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

In every age, there have been people who have sought to provide modern legitimacy to casteism. These people are no different. As for Karma not being based on past lives, that's pretty much in contradiction to their own religion. While these guys present posh arguments in favour of caste, their less peaceful counterparts kill people for the same. It's a well-oiled machine.

If karma is correct then why god come to dream and tell our past life

Ok explain to me a person like hitler who killed millions of people and made them suffer. And all there agony and sadness would have created so much of negative emotional energy right? So he doesn't gets affected by all of his work?? Who will assume the outcomes of these results?

Morality isn't unique to humans. You are right in saying that humans developed morality as a way to maintain order in society. But so do any other social animal(eg. other primates, elephants) . Social bonding is present in many other animals, and so is morality. Besides that, completely agree with you and love the video :)

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

They have the appearance of altruism and other social behaviour. But that's not morality. Morality, as humans practise it, has a supernatural angle. Thanks for liking the video.

Athirst means doesn't believe in god, karma , sprit right then spend the one whole day and night in most haunted place in india .

@vimoh

9 ай бұрын

Send money and tickets.

@cloudless_night

8 ай бұрын

​@@vimohyou see man, first these people use logic to justify their religion When that fails, they resort to the fear element. When that fails, he will resort to threatening. When that fails, there is a fair chance that he will become an atheist😂.

Please sir in Hindi

Theist atheist don't know karma defination:- कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन । मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भुर्मा ते संगोऽस्त्वकर्मणि ॥. It was never mean do good you will get good or do bad you will get bad. But logically if we will keep on abusing people will abuse us . if we keep on kindness we will get kindness. It not true always hence above definition is valid but even such thing won't happen the anger that we will generate will harm us. So call the expecting to happen anything good will also cost us. What you mention if that way people will take then it is not karma it is foolishness.

then how murdering a animals for food is justified

@vimoh

2 жыл бұрын

Who said it is justified?

@biswajitnath804

Жыл бұрын

Why need justification?

Why can't materialist be used instead. Atheism by definition relates to the non-existence of god/gods, does not mention about rejecting divine machinations. If others thinks materialists are amoral people that's their dumb prerogative.

@HolyRamanRajya

9 ай бұрын

Also I dislike the usage/movement of atheism as someone's sole identity. That attracts religious mosquitos that atheists are spammy like vegans etc. A person can be materialistm, or could be communist, or could be nihilist and that person by virtue will implicitly be an atheist, as one of many effects of having one of those overarching ideological identities..

Buddha ne kon sa ishwer diya thaa ? Koi nahi kya aap Buddha ko nastik nahi mante ?

I may be making a video and countering your points in future, as you took the concept of karma more in a religious way rather as universal concept. You actually missed the whole big thing bro BTW tq for being a responsible Rationalist

@vimoh

Жыл бұрын

Please send me a link when you do. Hope it's in English.

@kannadafactstar

Жыл бұрын

@@vimoh brother I thought of making in hindi, hope you understand cuz I need to reach more people. According to me if the person is already watching English content he is more likely to be Rationalist and doesn't believe it shitty things anymore. But in rural and hindi belt people should be educated about rationality where kattar believes exist.

@vimoh

Жыл бұрын

@@kannadafactstar Hindi is ok. I thought you'll make it in Kannada.

@meghannagvekar60

Жыл бұрын

Looking forward

Sirf buddha Tathagat hai.nastik ki shurvat hi buddha se hui hai. Jiska koi saboot nahi vo charvaka ko aap nastik bulate ho aur buddha ka name nahi lets kyu

हिंदी में दो आप तो

I think you have reached a stage where you are convinced yourself that what you think is an absolute truth and that what you think is the only perspective that should exists. Regarding Karma, it is a very wrong translation that if you do good karma good will happen to you and vice versa. Its bullshit explaination. The verse from Geeta says "karmanye vadhikaraste ma phaleshu kadachana" Meaning you have right or control over your Karma but not its fruits/repercussions. It never said that if you do good will will get good and vice versa. What the philosophy says or means is you have control over your actions, so choose ur actions wisely as u do not have control of its aftermath.

@vimoh

9 ай бұрын

wrong translation

@SonuThakur-801

4 ай бұрын

Hindi me jada achhe se samjh me aata please tell hindi

@SonuThakur-801

4 ай бұрын

Am also atheist

I think you have not basically understood the concept of Karma it doesn't stress too much just on morals but on the duty. Lion eating a deer is basically not wrong because it is doing what it is bound to do and thats the law of nature. Thus you can infact people who told you or where you heard it to be moral is ofcourse in its standard. But humans have civilized and thus they have different set of duties. Deer trying to escape is its duty and at the same time it might some time stay back to protect its kid and thats what the nature and this creation made them. Can you find an immoral animal? I am not sure as of now I haven't researched. But we can research on it by few things. Every common cuckoo steals other birds nest and that is its nature and thus it cannot be called immoral. And in case if only few common cuckoos steal other birds nest for no reason then it is immoral which you won't find. Karma is a complex concept tho.

@kingcorwin1006

9 ай бұрын

According to your logic, same can be said for humans.

I believe In Karma, but not in the traditional sense, science says every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This is a very oversimplification to explain how I interpret Karma.

@omdubey9570

2 ай бұрын

I think you are just talking about some kind of domino effect. Is it?

@purescam

2 ай бұрын

In a small way maybe but to be a dominos effect the reaction would have to grow or continue, so not really the same as my belief but I see your angle.

Really Sorry to say but YOU & Many didn’t understand the concept of Karma, and oversimplified it

@rocky3850

3 ай бұрын

Bro, karma isn't real, get over it, there are many people who do bad things but don't get karma for it, that's the truth. What karma did Hitler get for all he did??

@ApoorvSaurabh

3 ай бұрын

@@rocky3850 read my statement again

@tide7107

3 ай бұрын

@@ApoorvSaurabh there is nothing else to be inferred from your statement except for a potential ad hominem unless you elaborate further

@ApoorvSaurabh

3 ай бұрын

@@tide7107 alright, let me elaborate a little… Kamra theory doesn’t mean that your karma would come back to you i.e. if you did something good/ bad to someone, same would occur to you. It talks about the kind of aura you create within the world because of your karma, if you did something good, it’ll have an impact & the vice verse It might or might not come back to you, but it’ll surely have a rippling effect

@ApoorvSaurabh

3 ай бұрын

@@rocky3850 Kamra theory doesn’t mean that your karma would come back to you i.e. if you did something good/ bad to someone, same would occur to you. It talks about the kind of aura you create within the world because of your karma, if you did something good, it’ll have an impact & the vice verse It might or might not come back to you, but it’ll surely have a rippling effect What hitler did will effect the Jews for a long long time now, neither they will forget it nor will they let the world forget. In order to avoid the same they’ll do a lot of good and bad thing, then some other people community will be affected then they would retaliate, then so on and so on… Hope you got my point