One day religion will give up.

@devuniquedev1

19 күн бұрын

😅 underrated comment 💬.

@jack76thegamer30

9 күн бұрын

No they will not, its not because they are relentless or correct or something like that, but its a simple mix of stupidity+ignorance+arrogance.

The caller had a very rough idea about creation. He doesn't know that the world was created by the 'Flying Spaghetti Monster'... or as he may call it 'a conscious being'.

@tpb1006

2 ай бұрын

Dawkins

@nachiketadesai4188

2 ай бұрын

Hail our Lord FSM! R'Amen!

@tide7107

2 ай бұрын

@@nachiketadesai4188 Pastallelujah

@nachiketadesai4188

2 ай бұрын

@@tide7107 Pastallelujah!

@carldsonmarb2826

2 ай бұрын

Dont you think that all the universe and every living creature in it is an Evident in itself that there must be someone as God who created all of these complex things?

A hypothesis is not just a guess - it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

@JKBEAST

3 күн бұрын

Bro, I have a question. I do believe hypothesis should be based on some kind of proved theory and logic but i dont think it has to be testable. I mean if it would be testable, it might just become a theory or a disproven claim. dont get me wrong, I am not trynna argue, just genuinely discussing.For example, many world's interpretatuion is certainly based on the fact that wave function collapses and breaks the superposition but the existance of 'multiverse' cant be concluded from this alone. Yes, it has a strong mathematical basis but its not "testable". I hope you are getting my point. Do let me know if I said something inaccurate.

@14debanjan

3 күн бұрын

​​@@JKBEASTyou didn't say inaccurate. Often what happens with rationalists is that they become so tired arguing with idiots that while trying to refute them they often choose somewhat wrong line of arguement and also, they often have to forsake logical imagination. But rational imagination is very important to Science, that's how many hypothesis came to existence and Science progressed.

@JKBEAST

2 күн бұрын

@@14debanjan fair enough bro

Being controversial on its own existence for thousands and thousands of years and still prevails, is itself the best possible method to deny God existence. If still under exploration, which Infact never ends so discussion may be carried out till next asteroid impact and again the issue will vanish out with us unresolved.

i was there on the stream , really liked your stream , btw i joked that ai is gonna replace the artists lmao

Sunday morning premiere

Happy to see the cosmic duck fart universe hypothesis is getting some mainstream attention. Soon this will be proved as the true origin of the universe.

After watching this I forgot the meaning of hypothesis 😢😢😢 can someone explain please 😅

Very logical interesting debate Excellent 👍👍

I liked your debate with that guy

Sir with due Respect i want to participate in a debate with you on the matter and i believe it will be a great experience and indeed knowledgeable Thank you 🙏

Sab kab apka next podcast hai and aap hindi me bath karte ho kya!

This person on the line was a really rational being and provided great rebuttals and responses. I salute this man. I have very rarely found someone approach someting with such a neutral and objective stance. He even beat Vimoh at this.

@saintpixie2765

8 күн бұрын

Are you crazy ?? That guy was a massive idiot.

Vimoh, though i am an atheist as well, but talking about hypothesis only, Aryan said first there was god and then god manifested in various forms, to which you said he cannot base his hypothesis on utternaces of one or more persons on one planet. Similarly, since before the big bang there was singularity, which we all believe, why should we believe on what one/many scientists from just one planet say. AThat was a tie for you and Aryan. good debate though.

hypothesis is an assumption that is made based on some evidence...."SOME EVIDENCE"

Hypothesis is an assumption based on 'some' evidence.

@user-bq8ok6pz2n

Ай бұрын

No A hypothesis is an assumption made before any research has been done. It is formed so that it can be tested to see if it might be true.

Khayali Pulav Very tastey 😋

वैदिक ऋषि मुनि कहते हैं कि सच किसी के पास नहीं है क्योंकि इस मायावी संसार के अनुभव जो इंसानो को होते हैं वो अनुभव इस आधार पर होते हैं कि हम सभी प्राणी किसी खास आयाम मे, एक निश्चित समीकरण पर, किसी खास समय मे, किसी एक स्थान मे, किसी एक ग्रह पर, गुरुत्वाकर्षण की वजह से और वहाँ की तरंग आवृति और हमारी अपनी खुद की उन सभी तरंगों को ग्रहण करने की शक्ति पर ही सेट, फिक्स, टयुन्ड होते हैं और यहा तक कि वैज्ञानिकों के उपकरण भी इसी हिसाब से सेट व फिक्स होते हैं l हमारे ये अनुभव उन प्राणियों से अलग ही होंगे जो दूसरे अन्य किसी और अनुभव वाले बिंदुओं पर सेट हैं यानी इन अलग अलग बिंदुओं पर सेट तरह तरह के प्राणियों का अनुभव और फिर नजरिया अलग अलग ही होगा तो फिर किसका अनुभव सही और किसका गलत ये तय करने वाले हम, आप, वो, ये या अन्य कोई भी कौन होते हैं - समझो इसको गहराई से l देखिये ये दुनिया जैसे हम इंसानो को अनुभव होती है वैसी एक मच्छर को, एक कीड़े को, एक हाथी को, एक चींटी को, एक बैक्टीरिया को या फिर अन्य दूसरे ग्रह और ब्रह्मांड मे रहने वाले प्राणियों को नहीं होती है यानी ये दुनिया सबको अलग अलग रूप मे दिखती है और अनुभव मे आती है l इस एक दुनिया को सब अपने अपने हिसाब से अलग अलग तरीके से अनुभूत करते हैं और फिर वैसी ही राय बना लेते हैं और उसी को सच मान लेते हैं l उनके अनुभव उनके लिए तो सच हो सकते हैं मगर औरो के लिए वो सच बिल्कुल भी नहीं हैं l तभी तो वैदिक ऋषि ठहाका मार कर कहते हैं हे मुर्ख आदमी तू किस प्राणी के अनुभव मे आई हुई दुनिया के अनुभव को सच मानता है जो कि सबको अलग अलग रूपों मे अनुभव हो रही है l ये दुनिया मायावी और महाठग है जो हम सभी को भ्रम मे डाल कर उलझा दे रही है l तो किसी भी धार्मिक नेता, धर्म गुरु, वैज्ञानिक, मीडिया, राजनेता, प्रोफेसर, बुद्धिजीवी की बात का भी विश्वास मत करो बस अपनी खोज जारी रखो और दिमाग को हमेशा खुला ही रखो l कुदरत ने सबको अपना अपना प्राईवेट दिमाग इसीलिए दिया है कि लोग अपने का दिमाग इस्तेमाल करें और किसी के पीछे बिल्कुल भी ना चलें l यहाँ सच किसी के भी पास नहीं है फिर भले ही वो कोई भी तुर्रामखां हो l सब झूंठे अनुमान को अपने दिमाग मे लिए ढो रहे हैं l ये दुनिया ऐसे ही बनी और विकसित हुई है जहाँ सच एक बहुत ही गहराई मे जाकर के मिलता है और वो गहराई क्या है वो ही अभी तक किसी को मालूम नहीं है तो सच को क्या और कैसे खोजेगा कोई l सच किसी को नहीं मालूम है लेकिन अपनी पूँगी सब लोग बजाकर बड़े दावे करते हैं सच को खोज लेने के l तो सच ये ही है कि सच का किसी को भी नहीं पता l तो हम कह सकते हैं कि हर कोई सवाल पूछने वाला तो जिज्ञासु है मगर जवाब देने वाला ज्ञानी बिल्कुल भी नहीं है l दुनिया मे किये गए अब तक के सारे के सारे सवाल वाजिब हैं मगर दिये गए जवाबों मे से एक भी वाजिब और सही जवाब नहीं है l परमात्मा, ईश्वर एक तत्व है बिल्कुल खाली पड़े आकाश की तरह l ये कोई महामानव या सुपरमैन की तरह बिल्कुल भी नहीं है l ये कोई अज्ञान पुरुष (unknown person) की तरह से नहीं है जिसको कि हमको ढूँढना है ये तो बल्कि खाली पड़े आकाश की तरह से हर जगह मौजूद है l यानी ये कोई अज्ञात पुरुष नहीं है बल्कि ये अज्ञात स्थान है जो एक जगह केंद्रित ना हो कर सब जगह है, हर जगह है l और इसी अज्ञात जगह और खाली पड़े आकाश मे से ही सब कुछ अपने आप ही उत्पन्न होता है और नष्ट या विलुप्त होता है l उत्पत्ति मे से उत्पत्ति हो रही है यानी creator और creation दोनों एक ही हैं और ये ही अजूबा है जो समझ मे नहीं आता l यानी मैं अपने पिता की creation हूँ और मेरी संतान मेरी creation है l तो इस लिहाज से हर व्यक्ति खुद ही एक creation है और साथ ही साथ creator भी है - ये ही एक नियम है l

Sabine has a book on this. He calls such claims ascientific as opposed to anti-scientific.

Caller: "i like to think i am opened minded" ... you know exactly where this is going ... and, yep, exactly

Keep going Vimoh. What's your blood pressure after such streams? Please I need data.

@vimohlive

2 ай бұрын

Watchiing is harder than the discussions. My blood pressure remains fine during streams.

@doitwithnick501

2 ай бұрын

I was high while watching this stream😂

@vikassaini7485

Ай бұрын

​@@doitwithnick501What did you smoke to get high?

Aryan's definition of god is definitely logical contradictions. Omnipotent God leads to paradox of can God create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it. Such contradictory definition of god cannot exist

Bro went went with no data is hypothesis and take it as hypothesis but don't shame me with some other hypothesis on aesthetic basis. Bhai Many World has Measurable Notations to make it hypothesis and it isn't even science yet.

NO! existence of God cannot be a hypothesis because it is not falsifiable. Other than that the god that religions around the world taking about has been disproven many times like the phenomenon of lightening, raining , waves etc all were thought to be caused by a supreme deity is every religion and culture and is explained by science. So the question should be why science should we take religion seriously when it have been proved wrong multiple times.

@user-fx1mm7wf5z

Ай бұрын

Not really, There is always possibility of a god (may be a higher civilization ) & we are just npc like characters with memories, as much as I have seen universe feels and acts like a programmed game with good physics engine 😂

Fine tuned universe.??

The headache of this video trying to decipher what the caller is trying to say

Are you from odisha ??

Vimoh bhaii.... he is right... me God he baat kr rha hu😂😂😂

background Comics Poster =MAST

People need to really know about fallacies and cognitive biases before debating.

Vimol is doing a great work towards removing stupidity from our society.....

Sir Madam This body is made of 4 billion cells live. Dr Brian Cox in Rajasthan 🐪 camel verified live cells of the camel is the same as Dr Cox.

Hello Vimoh, could you dispel the superstitions surrounding Mount Kailash? Numerous people assert that Lord Shiva resides there, and they believe the mountain is unclimbable and that one ages rapidly while there. Thanks 🙏

@vimohlive

2 ай бұрын

anything asserted without evidence can be rejected without justification

@electrondynamics9721

2 ай бұрын

@@vimohlive "claims without evidence can be discarded without it" -Christopher Hitchens

Just say few words for God and religion are they same or different Maybe be I can debate with you😅

❤❤❤❤❤❤

This is a case for Scotland argument. ‘It’s my invention’. The national animal of Scotland is a Unicorn, so it’s officially backed by authority, tradition and perhaps ‘a constitution’ (or whatever). Now, is it up to us to disapprove it? because not all the nations of the world put together can prove that a unicorn doesn’t exist. So Scotland can continue to believe in Unicorns or Gremlins or Chupacabra, and give them exalted positions, but the rest of the world will wink, smile and joke about it. Lesson: No one is stopping you from calling a Unicorn your national animal or another animal as your favorite relative, but please do not expect the rest of the world to indulge in your fantasies.

@13:51 .... there are many hypothesis we make in scientific world also *"on the basis of observation "* So मेरे भाई तुम्हारे सृष्टि करता कि व्याख्या में क्या और कौनसे ऐसे *" observation "* जिसके आधार पे ये दांवा कर रहे हो कि *"मनुष्य जैसे किसी सजीव ने इस सृष्टि का निर्माण किया"* what are the *observation* on which you draw a conclusion that there was a living being which create this universe *You are making only claim, without any observation

Aaj Eid hai aur maine bhi khayali pulaw khaya😂😂

my man is rock hard to prove that his hypothesis is best for next netflix series.

Good line ...Bro...in min 6:29 God in side us.. God in mountain... God in space ... Sab check kiya sab jhut nikla.. ...... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Rashad khalifa advanced 19 hypothesis.

Vimoh: You made a huge jump there.😐 Him: Yes

I proud to be muslim☪️️☪️️ Allah hu akbar❤❤❤❤❤

👍

13:18 ☠️

First best thing I watched on Sunday morning 😅❤

The human body has five main sensory organs through which we perceive the world. These are: Eyes, Ears, Nose, Tongue and Touch. So, if things, such as God and Ghost eyc. are not perceived through any of these senses, how can we believe in the existence of those things? For thousand years, nobody found any evidence of God's existence. Therefore, believing in God's existence without any evidence totally blind faith!

इसमें आप हिंदी वाले कैसे सुने साहब कैसे समझे हिंदी वाले

@doitwithnick501

2 ай бұрын

Learn English😂

@user-ey8ki3xc4j

Ай бұрын

Bhai sunta rah samjh me aane lagegi

@adityaagrahari5997

Ай бұрын

Not funny but ok​@@doitwithnick501

Evolution and cosmology are two things every religion got wrong, including Hinduism. No need to such sofisticated arguments.

@johnconstantine8574

2 ай бұрын

Not exactly ancient greek and hindus actually talked about evolution. Main problem here is that we tries to unify each of hindu philosophy under one umbrella religion. Philosophy of spanda shavaism is different from advaita vedanta yet believer of both spiritual philosophies are classified as hindu. We don't say platonism and stoicism are same religions.

@electrondynamics9721

2 ай бұрын

@@johnconstantine8574 watch science is dope ......video on evolution they didn't talked about evolution.....

Sir apko jabab nhi de pate 😂

The person asking question has some confusions ParamBrahma is NOT God. God means Devata. The god of The Abrahamic religions is a devata. In these religions, the followers are monotheists. So, they are not allowed to worship any other devata. Many Hindus get confused by monotheism and mix up Param Brahma with the god worshipped by Abraham

Why are you eager to bring this down to such quantifiable level?

@vimohlive

3 ай бұрын

To understand it

@akash3june

3 ай бұрын

Then we'll try and control it, to make it corruptible... as it already is.

@vimohlive

3 ай бұрын

@@akash3june It's even easier to corrupt things one doesn't understand

@akash3june

3 ай бұрын

Only if the fear and greed is used for it...and to understand it, it's a never ending process, you keep learning and practicing, just like science.

I created god😂

@sonuaryan5287

3 ай бұрын

😮 🙏

@KADAMBA_SANATANI_02

3 ай бұрын

I am god Aham brahmasmi

@user-rv4vr6jm7o

3 ай бұрын

@@KADAMBA_SANATANI_02 👌

@ramanprajapati675

2 ай бұрын

U R damm right

@spuriusscapula4829

2 ай бұрын

​@@KADAMBA_SANATANI_02 sounds like a whole lot of mental gymnastics tbh. I don't mean to be rude. Just an observation.

sir hanuman chalisa me kaise earth to sun ki distance correct kaise likhi gyi ye to proof valid lagta hia na? what do you say?

@hemachandrak3799

3 ай бұрын

'Science is dope' has a nice video on that topic, watch it.

@rohitmehra87

3 ай бұрын

@@hemachandrak3799 on vimoh channel?

@yenaremadun7184

3 ай бұрын

It's not correct

@sumitkumar-gs2nc

3 ай бұрын

nahi likhi gyi. Ye ek myth hai. Andhere mein chhode gye 50 teer mein se Kabhi kabhi ek nishaane pe lg jata hai, lekin jb inspection kari jae to pata chlta hai k case to kuchh aur hi hai.. For more, visit the science is Dope channel like suggested here.

@rohitmehra87

3 ай бұрын

@@sumitkumar-gs2nc sir actually ye channel science is dope englsih me h aur mai jyda english me comfortable nhi hu. isley deep meaning samjh ni aata. aur han ek teer nhi ek aur fact ki 84 lakh yoniyo ka wo bhi almost correct h as per science almost there tak kaise pahuch gye the sant gyani log wo bhi bina kisi tech ke.

to make claim about religion first read enough literature from the best possible source and INTERPRETATION that is accurate. to come with flawed argument and shameless to admit their theory as wrong. The conversation otherwise is a dead end.

can anyone name things that don't have a creator?? just a question out of curiosity.

@sumitkumar-gs2nc

3 ай бұрын

If one assumes a creator, than that creator won't have a creator, unless you want to go back to an infinite number of creators creating subsequent creators.

@hemachandrak3799

3 ай бұрын

Water, rocks, soil

@akshayde

3 ай бұрын

frogs

@SupaHotFire776

2 ай бұрын

Yes the god you claim to exist.

@animechannel5938

2 ай бұрын

The universe 🤷‍♂️

“you Knoooww?!”

@SHANSHOW-

2 ай бұрын

😂

God is par Brahma, this hypothesis is from a late period , (perhaps from Upnishad) God in earliest Hindu texts (Vedas) are Indra, Varun, Mitra etc.

I'll add a bit more detail to the conversation for better context. a hypothesis is actually the 2nd step of the scientific method. there needs to be some observations before one can even make a hypothesis, what Vimoh was referring to as data. based on observations we make a falsifiable statement, the hypothesis. we should remember that for physical realities, we can never prove a negative. the statement is always positive and evidence either proves the statement or leaves it in the hypothesis state. the many world interpretation is one way of explaining why quantum mechanics (QM) is the way it is. it is not the same as saying "there might be a god" which is based on subjective experiences. QM as a theory has been well established and the many world interpretation, along with other proposed theories, are proposing hypothesis based on the reality of QM. as long as we don't have any way of verifying the "other worlds" caused by wave function collapse, such theories will not be proved.

God is the favourite imagination of humans to do irrational actions.

Bro is tryin hard💀💀

Aap debate karte raho badalne bala to kuch he nahi upar se aap ka channel bhi to debate kar ke hi chalta he. aap ka aur kuch kaam to hoga nahi. god he ki nahi issi par bat kar te raheteho.

I am not interested😂

Is shit in conflict with biryani

Rigidity all around.😂

Aise logo ko hi shashtro me andh bhagat kaha gaya hai 😅

Jai bhim jai Bharat sir