Incredible, the amount of coughs and sneezes! Somebody count them - this has to be a record!

@user-pr6sb9ix3y

2 ай бұрын

Ahahaha !!!

La gente con afecciones pulmonares NO DEBE ASISTIR A NINGUN CONCIERTO.....!! Bellísima versión del "violín concert"....Bravo por pianista y orquesta!.....Grande genio Beethoven!

Finally somebody who plays this magnificent concerto in the correct tempi, as Beethoven's student Carl Czerny reported them! Especially mentionable is the second movement! Everything makes sense like this! BRAVISSIMO! Why do I only discover this nine years after publishing? This recording should be made a compulsory listening task for violinists!

Il n'y en a pas beaucoup de personnes qui connaissent ce concerto qui est une transcription de son concerto pour violon ...magnifique

Beethoven sapeva bene quel che faceva. Lui è il Maestro dei Maestri.

@miriamallemand2343

2 ай бұрын

Hai ragione, caro Giorgio !

Roberto e' sempre un pianista per me che da' grosse emozioni, ogni pezzo che esegue e' pieno di sentimento e di pathos, una totale full immersion. Bravissimoooo, orgogliosa poi di collaborare con lui.

@manuelflamencoyolvera7343

Жыл бұрын

El concierto en si es precioso y en cada versión se superan

1st movement: 0:01 2nd movement: 23:22 3rd movement: 35:22

This is Opus 61a, Beethoven's arrangement of Opus 61 (Violin Concerto in D major) for piano. It is not the (Hess 15) Piano Concerto No. 6 in D major (which Beethoven only partially finished). They are two completely different and distinct works.

it was Beethoven himself who transcribed this for piano so it can be legitimately be called his 6th piano concerto.

@noneofyoubusiness4895

6 жыл бұрын

Given that it was written between his 4th and 5th piano concerto, no, it can't legitimately becalled his 6th. Simple logic.

@matthewgrubb8826

5 жыл бұрын

Well if you fancy re numbering his concertos feel free. But as he only wrote 5 piano concertos and then transcribed his violin concerto for piano at a later date, no this is regarded as his 6th piano concerto and is always called such, simple logic.

@nickjgunning

4 жыл бұрын

@@matthewgrubb8826 it goes by the order of publication. Hence the muddle over the numbering of Dvorak's symphonies. Liszt wrote about five piano concertos but two weren't published and have no numbers.

@germangarciamartinez4097

4 жыл бұрын

It was Beethoven himself who transcribed this for piano so it can be legitimately be called by its own name. OP 61A. Even if he transcribed a Piano concerto for violin doesn´t mean he wrote a second Violin Concerto. Man.

@christiant8590

4 жыл бұрын

Noneofyou Business The 2nd piano concerto was written 10 years before the 1st one

Plus connu pour son interprétation pour violon, il reste un chef d'œuvre, transcrit par Beethoven lui même.

Хорошо,что стали,наконец,чаще играть этот концерт..Все таки сам Бетховен переложил для фортепиано

@chariyabrockelman7791

4 ай бұрын

24:30

C'est de la très bonne musique: Un grand Merci!

BRAVO !!!!!!!

A piano es maravilloso y a su original violín es sublime

Me ecanta recordar que la he escuchado ,este bellisimo concierto ,Buen dia

Formidable concierto del gran maestro Beethoven y en mi instrumento preferido!

splendido😄

As many have pointed out, this is NOT Beethoven's 6th Piano Concerto, was never called that by the composer who published the piano transcription BEFORE the publication of his 5th Concerto. And he NEVER called his one and only opera "Leonora " : it was always called Fidelio from it's first performance in 1805. It was only after Richard Strauss conducted a revival of the original version in 1905, that the publisher decided to call the original version in "Leonora " to distinguish it from the definitive version of 1814.

Greetings. This is a right-hand Piano concerto after a great piece of Music (Beethoven’s). It might be a great Piano work doing changes in piano tecnique. However, it is interesting audio to hear.

Super

特屬音樂值得聆聽

Beethoven is always Beethoven, always brilliant. But it does seem strange that such a master of the keyboard didn't do more to make this dynamic and pianistic. He certainly knew how. And it is certainly dynamic on the violin. The pianistic texture is thin and treble-heavy throughout.

@mirrors1

2 жыл бұрын

Quando a suonare era lui non suonava mai la parte scritta, perché, come hanno scritto tutti quelli che l'hanno ascoltato, nessun essere umano poteva suonare come suonava lui. Non poteva scrivere ciò che nessun altro sarebbe stato capace di suonare.

Ecoutez l'original interprété par Zino Francescatti, et oubliez la transcription pour piano...quelle maestria...

@STEPHANM0ELLER

Ай бұрын

En fait, les deux versions sont originales et étaient publiés simultanement!

This performance is awesome. I'm a huge fan of your compatriot Vincenzo Maltempo but you're on the same skill level as he is.

@STEPHANM0ELLER

Ай бұрын

And this maestro could be called "Bontempo", because that is what he has: The right tempo!

Hi, Christopher and thank you. There seems to be confusing regarding the opus numbering in relation to ‘61a’. Google indicates that this numbering relates to his piano transcription of the wonderful violin concerto so more confusion. I have been listening to the great man for over 70 years and never heard of a sixth concerto per se. I am sure this topic may continue to be debated for many years yet (at least by those of us who care!!🤨

@christophevans1494

6 жыл бұрын

Hello - yes, I quite agree that Beethoven would NOT have wanted this concerto to be known as his 6th. The fact that everyone generally thinks of "the five piano concertos" is reasonable - Beethoven published five..but of course there exist ELEVEN distinct effort that feature the piano interacting with orchestra...these are in chronological order: 1) the youthful Eb concerto (WooO4); the Bb rondo (Woo6). (which was the original rondo to the Bb concerto); the Bb concerto (op 19); the concerto in C (op 15), in C minor (op 37); the concerto for Piano Trio (op 56); the concerto in G (op 58); the adaptation of the D major Violin Concerto (op 61a), the Choral Fantasy (op 80); the Emperor Eb Concerto (op 73) and the SUBSTANTIAL fragment of his last venture into the concerto form - the concerto in D for piano and orchestra begun in 1814 (known as Hess 15). The publisher of the Violin Concerto (Clementi in London) asked Beethoven to supply a version for the piano soon after the violin version was received and published. It may in fact be true that early on there was MORE interest in the score for piano and orchestra than for the initially unsuccessful violin version. And a trivia question: for WHICH concerto did Beethoven provide a cadenza that featuresTHE TIMPANI as well as the piano solo? :)

@wotan9630

6 жыл бұрын

Christopher, I take my hat off to you and thank you for your very erudite and wonderfully knowledgeable answer. You have given me a lot to think about and research. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

Is a violin concerto!!!!!

@markwalker2952

5 жыл бұрын

Tell Beethoven. He wrote the piano version of his violin concerto. Apparently the violin reviews were not great.

@nickjgunning

4 жыл бұрын

He wrote the piano part for a student, apparently. Beethoven was a fully trained violinist and the concerto seems to have been successful. The piano version just doesn't seem to have been performed much, but it doesn't look technically difficult.

@STEPHANM0ELLER

Ай бұрын

@@nickjgunning He wrote the piano version on demand of the publisher Clementi. That got him an extra fee. However, both versions are authentic Beethoven! However, he was not a "fully trained violinist". In his early years, he played the viola in the opera orchestra in Bonn. That's why he did not compose a cadenza for the violin version; only for the piano version we have Beethoven's original cadenzas!

Where the first and second movement are clearly better for the violin, the third sounds obvious for a piano concerto third-moevement. Not to say it is brilliant as well for violin-and-orchestra as well. But most of Beethovens works are very good.

This is NOT Beethoven's 6th piano concerto. Such is very different this. This is a transcription of his excellent violin concerto for a piano. Get your facts right.

@GabMelonius

8 жыл бұрын

It's all in the video description

@paulogazola553

7 жыл бұрын

At the Timpani tum-tum-tum I've realized that too... sorry

@Pleyel204

7 жыл бұрын

In the description "original" means that the transcription has been done by Beethoven himself. So it is definitively an original Beethoven work. As far as I remember he did it because at the beginning his violin concerto was not very popular. I think it is a very interesting work that should be played more often.

@wotan9630

6 жыл бұрын

Yes, he did the transcription himself, I suspect for commercial reasons. - to get it heard more often. BUT as far as I am aware he never classed it as his “6th”. It is not for us mere devotees to muck about with his cataloguing. We must accept the work as his product and not to give it a false description.

@bierjip1

6 жыл бұрын

Beethoven apparently made two versions at the time and considered them equal. The violin version is better known, but the other version is known as the 6th piano concerto.

Is the transcription for piano of the violin concert op.61.

Could be a model for violinistic interetation concerning tempi, (2. Movement a little too slow) but why the small changes in the Cadenza of the first movement? And the orchestra often too loud and the dynamics in Solo not always following Beethoven?

@germangarciamartinez4097

4 жыл бұрын

So, let me understand. Is it the original piece or not? (talking about the cadenza supposedly written by composer himself) I want to know the small changes you refer to. It´s my first glance at the piano version.

Must be an misunderstanding! Are we talking about the same piece? Are you talking about the piano version of the Violin Concerto Op. 61? There is an original piano version of it in the first english edition. Beethovens Cadenza is a huge and not so fitting piece of rough music., that violinists since 100 years try to play transcribed for violin. My last try seems acceptavble to me.

No se indica el director ni que orchestra es, como asimismo, donde se grabo. Todos esos datos son siempre muy importantes. Beethoven escribi solo 5 piano concertos. Esta es una transcripcion efectuada por el mismo Beethoven ant el requerimiento de su agente en Londres que le exigia otro piano concerto y no encontro nada mejor que hacer estra transcripcion, en la que las notas para la mano derecha casi permanecieron identicas a su obra de violin.

@germangarciamartinez4097

4 жыл бұрын

Leí que no tuvo éxito en la Premiere con Clement y la transcribió para ver sin tenía mejor aceptación. Por cierto, no sé si has visto la descripción del vídeo la cual es bastante detallada. Perdona si ya lo hiciste. "Live, unedited recording. Palermo, Teatro Massimo, April 2, 2015. Orchestra del Teatro Massimo, conducted by Aziz Shokakimov."

ベートーベンの中期の作品の立派さを、音楽とオケパートは持っている作品である。但し、ピアノはもっと多彩な響きを作りたかったと思う。四番とは似ている気がする。どちらもソロは音階が中心となっているからである。四番はチェロ協奏曲になれば良かっただろう。そしてこの曲は狙い通りバイオリンの協奏曲になって良かった。

Ojala que Beethoven no esté sufriendo con esta transcripción.

@CarlosMendoza-zn5fu

4 жыл бұрын

Él mismo la transcribió a petición de Muzio Clementi

Et il a composé ça en étant malentendant??

17:38 cadenza

Mr Prosseda, thank your for sharing and my admiration towards you as an artist. Forgive my harsh words now, but the sound is unbearable. Like someone playing behind a door of a closet or through a thick towel. Not a good idea to promote you or classical music as such. Please provide a higher quality with 192kbps as the lowest possible bitrate. Yours sincerely.

huh????

He specifically counted in his numbering. Logically, things like harmony, accompaniment and dynamics are radically different from the violin version. This winning is just nit picking.

Trascrizione dell op.61(concerto per violino) in 61a non e concerto no.6 per pianoforte! Il titolo e sbagliato! Concerto no.6 di Beethoven e un altra cosa ( Hess 15/ Unvollendete 6).

@Gabrimedde

11 ай бұрын

in realta pensaci bene, il concerto per pianoforte hess 15 non è stato completato, abbiamo solamente 200 battute sparse in 30 pagine di manoscritto, ed anche se è il suo sesto concerto in ordine di scrittura, non abbiamo la possibilità di suonarlo dall'inizio alla fine. questo concerto op. 61a, invece, è completo dalla prima all'ultima battuta, e si, è una trascrizione del concerto per violino, si, è "inferiore" a quello per violino, ma è sempre scritto e pubblicato da lui per pianoforte, quindi si può considerare come "sesto concerto per pianoforte e orchestra" di Beethoven.

Per favore, silenzio , ecco .... la voce di Dio .....

I dont like the tempo. What is the hurry if we have all the life to hear to Beethoven?

@germangarciamartinez4097

4 жыл бұрын

Maxim Vengerov. Marek Pijarowski. I can´t agree anymore. I APPRECIATE the work though.

@STEPHANM0ELLER

12 күн бұрын

This is the only recording of this version at least close to Beethoven's original tempo, as being reported by his pupil Carl Czerny!

As Beethoven only wrote 5 piano concertos this is either a world premiere of a newly found work of him or the 6 is just a mistake. Which one is it?

@Gabrimedde

11 ай бұрын

Beethoven didn't wrote only 5 piano concertos. we have the piano part of a "piano concerto no. 0", written at the age of 14. when he was already deaf he started the writing of a piano concerto, but he died before complete it, so we have only 30 pages. we have the choral fantasy op. 80 and the rondo for piano and orchestra in b-flat. and then, we have this piano concerto, completed from the first to the last bar, published along the violin version. so this is technically a piano concerto, written in 1808 along is piano concerto no.4, so we can call it "piano concerto no.6 in D major op.61a, after the Violin concerto".

Bethoven superva benre !

Encuentro esta versión muy ruda y brusca. He oído otras mucho más suaves, sin renunciar a la energía que desprenden siempre las obras de Behetoven. Por otro lado, parece que el auditorio estaba formado por un grupo de enfermos de pulmón.

This is not Beethoven Piano Concerto Nr. 6!!! There are 5 Beethoven-Piano-Concertos and BASTA!!!

@Gabrimedde

11 ай бұрын

this is technically a piano concerto, written in 1808 along is piano concerto no.4, so we can call it "piano concerto no.6 in D major op.61a, after the Violin concerto". PUNTO.

Все таки не зря не играют это переложение. Много неудобного и плохо звучащего.

L'orchestra l'ha eseguito in modo bandistico; i timpani esagerati, sguaiati. Le cadenze del pianoforte, inappropriate. Risultato pessimo.

@STEPHANM0ELLER

12 күн бұрын

The timpani are very essential in this work (e.g. in the beginning and the cadenza); you could almost call it Beethoven's timpani concerto!

The great man may have transcribed the violin concerto but he has never been recorded as calling it his sixth Concerto and NOBODY has the right to say that it is. Such arrogance to claim you know better than the composer 👿👿👿👿👿👿

@christophevans1494

6 жыл бұрын

Peter, alas there is a long history of this work being informally referred to as "the 6th" so you may be a bit unfair in chastising Matt; one thing is certain: Beethoven PUBLISHED six concertos for piano solo and orchestra: op 15, 19, 37, 58, 61a (this one) and 73.

@matthewgrubb8826

5 жыл бұрын

Bit of an arrogant reply to be honest wotan, I may be wrong, but I don't think Beethoven ever got a recording contract and told the record company what he wanted to call this. "Beethoven's violin concerto transcribed for piano which I did because I was feeling in a good mood that day when I was asked" is a bit of a of a mouth full don't you think.(to be clear I'm being sarcastic, before you also inform me that records weren't invented then). He wrote 5 piano concertos and transcribed his violin concerto for piano himself. So when played with piano it gets referred to as above. I bet you like correcting people's pronunciation of foreign words too don't you.

@denniszerance4214

4 жыл бұрын

In

@nickjgunning

4 жыл бұрын

Absolutely wrong. He rewrote it specifically for one of his students. Calling people arrogant because they have different information from you is just lazy and ignorant. There are so-called music lovers who are as fanatical about the publisher's notes as the score and the composition. You see them at concerts with a miniature score ready to write a complaint to a musical journal if the performer misses a hemi-demi-semi-quaver. We know Beethoven's playing was 'rough' and certainly the piano instructions for his broadwood of the time would not be suitable for a modern instrument.