Imagine if at the end of inception Leonardo decaprio thought he was in a dream because the top never stopped but in reality it turns out that someone had replaced his top with this battery powered one.

@Oyabu...

Жыл бұрын

At least that would be an end

@ashes1895

Жыл бұрын

Then 1st thing he wud hav probably done was, to find and shoot every Free energy youtuber

@kiranrajkp

Жыл бұрын

So that he dies and wake up. Plot twist: top was replaced with battery powered one within his dream.

@fridgers

Жыл бұрын

But he would realize it weighs different because he is supposed to know the weight of it

@mrkitty777

Жыл бұрын

Blast 😎 we're not even in a cute matrix or dream world, but inception is a great movie 🍿

Thanks for giving more and more knowledge everyday man 👍🙂

@shanibres

Жыл бұрын

do you know where can I get the top in the video?

1:32 Minute error but the torque applied to the ball isn't at the center of the sphere but at the point of contact with the ground.

@TheActionLab

Жыл бұрын

you are correct

@anonamemous6865

Жыл бұрын

@@TheActionLabHi is our galaxy rotation flat or is it 3d?

@DrakonIL

Жыл бұрын

The reason the ball will roll, even if you push at the center is that the table/ground resists your push, applying a second torque at the bottom.

@mike1024.

Жыл бұрын

@@anonamemous6865 I once wondered about this too. It's mostly flat, because for some reason 3d things collapsing due to gravity tend to collapse in 1 dimension first. One example of something in a clearly different plane is Pluto, but its plane of rotation is just angled somewhat from the rest of the planets.

@SHOW_Films

Жыл бұрын

@@TheActionLab Where can I buy this top? I WANT IT

Your KZread channel may be the most brilliant in all of KZread. Your videos are amongst the most fascinating, while at the same time the ideas are shown, and filmed, in such clear and simple ways. You have a very special talent in this regard. Thanks so much for continuing to make your amazing content.

When 'Life could be dream' comes true

@konoveldorada5990

Жыл бұрын

Tuuuuuuu ruuuuuuu Tu tut Tu ruuuuu

@cybernerd7492

Жыл бұрын

Sh-boom, if I could take you to a paradise up above

@jacob.rausch

Жыл бұрын

If you would tell me I'm the only one that you lo-ove

This is the same principle used in spacecraft to allow them to rotate without using fuel

@CraftyF0X

Жыл бұрын

They look a bit differently but yea, reaction wheels.

@furious-vengeance

Жыл бұрын

Some have seen and described unknown craft that actually look this.

@jazermano

Жыл бұрын

So... You could rephrase it as: Spaceships vibe out in space to maneuver. I like the mental image that this conjures, as imprecise as it may be.

@Makes_me_wonder

Жыл бұрын

No. There's nothing in space to provide the friction. It's a slightly different mechanism.

@g3netixmg36

Жыл бұрын

@Makes me wonder Alot of spacecraft use gravity as its source of friction.

There is a real way to find out if you're dreaming. It's called reality checks. What you do is ask yourself these questions: "am I dreaming?" Do a few teste to see like counting your fingers, trying to breathe through a plugged nose, reading and/or looking at time and then looking away to see if it changes. The other question: "How did I get here?" Try to remember when you woke up and retrace your steps on how you got where you currently are. If you can't you're in a dream. After all this is done, if it turns out you're nit dreaming ask yourself what you would do if it was a dream. Doing these daily consistently and keeping a dream journal basically guarantees a lucid dream. Lucid dreaming is an incredible skill so many people are missing out on but anyone can learn

@cherryangel4u

Жыл бұрын

How can we authentically learn it?

@shekki3192

Жыл бұрын

I also heard, that try look yourself from mirror. Mirrors show weird stuff in dream I once looked mirror in the dream (accidently, I wasn't controllling dream) and my eyes had black triangles, I realized immediatly that I was in a dream.

@parkerb9262

Жыл бұрын

you should check out explore lucid dreaming, it has a lot of tips on stuff like that (also it’s belugas old channel if you watch him haha)

@MetalJohnZn

Жыл бұрын

I always dream lucid, it's the best thing there is. But it'll always be just a dream..

@_profile

Жыл бұрын

I think if you have to wonder if you're dreaming you're most likely dreaming lol

Isn’t 15,000 galaxies way way way too small of a sample size to be close to get an accurate assessment? I’m not sure why the universe would need angular momentum when that small of a percentage could just be chances or odds of what they measured. Not to mention we don’t even know how many galaxies are beyond the observable universe

@christianlabanca5377

Жыл бұрын

Yeah I don't know. I would like to know if those researchers took into consideration the statistical assumption they were making but 7% is not that much and 15.000 is a very very very small sample. Also I think there could be a lot more places of concentration of angular momentum, not only individual galaxies, also the clusters and super clusters could and probably are spinning in some way but it is completely undetectable

@matthewnardin7304

Жыл бұрын

Not even remotely close to a good sample size. That's less than 0.000015% of the low estimate of galaxies.

@missy1806

Жыл бұрын

Plus the added variables of black holes, gravity of the galaxy suns, planets etc. Everything needs to be included to get a proper picture of how things work.

@MisterPatel

Жыл бұрын

The universe is identical in every direction so it might just be a big enough sample

@Avisha_Jain

Жыл бұрын

Yeah that's what I thought

Except we can't conclude that more of the universe is spinning in one direction than the other because we are limited by the distance that we can observe (the observable universe) so it might actually be 50/50, or way off from that.

@mike1024.

Жыл бұрын

I wonder if the actual paper he cited discusses the sampling error possibility? Statistics is strong enough to say that the likelihood of their proportion representing the whole universe is more than 95% or even 99%, if they've sampled well enough.

@Nekzuris

Жыл бұрын

Btw how do you measure the spinning direction of a galaxy? (I mean from what reference) Does it have pole like a planet?

@3zdayz

Жыл бұрын

but things falling towards a gravitational source are following a gravity point that is lagged from the actual moving thing, they will always hit off-center and impart a angular momentum.... Only if everything was exactly still in the universe would they hit on-center, but then they will impart a linear momentum, which will cause them to move, and subsequent collisions happen off-center. There is no initial torque in the universe.

@BobAndGlueSticks

Жыл бұрын

@@Nekzuris yeah thats what i was thinking

@edwardblair4096

Жыл бұрын

@@Nekzuris Answering the frame of reference question is important. In a single telescope view, you could use an "as seen by the observer" reference. Galaxies that are not exactly edge on can be assigned into "left" and "right" bins. But if you take an image in exactly the opposite direction, do you invert the "left" and "right" categories? At any viewing angle between them, do you also try to compensate?

the vacuum chamber gets a cameo in every Action lab video

i really enjoyed

Thanks if I was not already experiencing enough existential dread about the nature of reality already LOL

@westonding8953

Жыл бұрын

There are galaxies that we will never see because they are blocked by the view of our own galaxy.

@BJL2142

Жыл бұрын

Don't sweat it mate, everything will be as it always has, fine. No matter what happens friend

@liu3chan

Жыл бұрын

@@BJL2142 Not really. Since humans showed up everything went downhill.

@BJL2142

Жыл бұрын

@@liu3chan my comment meant once your dead, because death is a break in continuity Even still humans aren't sh*t in the grand scheme of everything ever Gl

@boethiah12

Жыл бұрын

If you really want some dread, there is technically a 50-50 chance we live in a simulation.

I just finished watching inception, so this is pretty fitting

@ImigrentfromMars

Жыл бұрын

fits because this is a dream and its time to wa

@rollomaughfling380

Жыл бұрын

@@ImigrentfromMars Underrated.🖕

This was one of the most fascinating discussions of angular momentum I've ever seen. I loved how you took a simple example of a spinning top to explain conservation and then extended it to the net angular momentum of the universe

Thank you so much for all the knowledge you have given so far. I am always waiting for your following videos to drop.

"The Water is applying torque to the ball." More like the the center of mass is ofset to the balance point or the center of buoyancy and gravity is using this distance as a "lever" to apply the torque.

@F_L_U_X

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, that statement didn't sit right with me either. I guess he was trying to simplify things...but he shouldn't have stated it this way just for arguments sake.

@FelanLP

Жыл бұрын

@@F_L_U_X the video is a bit too over simplified. Is is the rotation of the motor that induces a rotation in the opposite direction or is it some gyroscopic effect similar to that spinning ball that spins faster when you shake it? The explanation is so over simplified that I don't understand it anymore.

@WeighedWilson

Жыл бұрын

The water is irrelevant. It would spin in a vacuum without gravity.

@victortitov1740

Жыл бұрын

yeah, and actually i still do not understand how is the top sustaining the spin. It cannot utilize gravity in the same way because its spinning axis is fairly accurately vertical.

Btw that spinning motor can also be found in many phones, which provides the vibrations for notifications and haptic feedback

For me this is the coolest experiment until now on this channel! Always wanderd about inertia mystery! This gives some answers but also new questions! For shure something to think about more. Keep going Mr Action Lab, you are the best!

It’s possible that while the OBSERVABLE universe has net angular momentum, parts of the universe far enough away to be beyond the horizon of what we can see might have the opposite angular momentum.

@sawik5

Жыл бұрын

This is a good comment.

@snteevveetns

Жыл бұрын

You are ignoring the obvious answer.

@snteevveetns

Жыл бұрын

@@sawik5 it’s not a good comment. It’s wishful thinking. Circular reasoning… SETI has been listening to the universe since 1984 (other work was going on for nearly 90 years before it) and they’ve come up with: nothing. Oh it’s out there we just need to keep listening… the problem is compounding, the more you listen, nothing is heard… same with peering to the “edge” of the galaxy… yet there is more and more out there. “Just given more time we’ll find something.” No, they will not. Our universe is elegantly designed. Evidence of design is all around. DNA is the greatest/most complex computer code… bill gates said something along this.

@DuckStorms

Жыл бұрын

@@snteevveetns who said anything at all about aliens??

@sawik5

Жыл бұрын

@@snteevveetns yeah dude, in my original comment i agreed with the actual reasoning value and quality of the comment, it's nothing about aliens, nothing about keeping looking, its just a factual statement that this angular momentum might be local to our local observable universe which has a definitive border, and I know we will never find other data. Your comment is valid but just seems kinda like not really on the subject we were talking about. Tho, I get you man, sometimes i also got wrongly triggered with normal stuff after some too long sesh with some "belivers" or other antivaccers. It's easy to get paranoid, It's just we are not spreading any misinformation, just pointing out a valid thing that was missed in the video. However I do see how in wrong hands this argument could be turned around and used by crazy people for screaming "Aliens!!!", i just hope there are none here xd.

Are we living in a dream? *Tanjiro searching katana in his basement..*

i kinda want to buy that spinning top to troll some people

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

We'd sell it to you if you'd wanna buy them

@Crytum

Жыл бұрын

@@fearlesstoys3474 Sure where would I go to get one?

@shanibres

Жыл бұрын

@@Crytum look at their channel, they make them

@Crytum

Жыл бұрын

@@shanibres i have checked their channel and i cant find any way to purchase it there. no links other than a broken link to an old kickstarter page on one of their videos

Apart from the rest part of this video, the information provided at the last part is amazing. Thanks.

You start the video at end of inception and still blow our minds. You are awesome!

15,158 is too small a sample size out of hundreds of billions in the visible universe, it's entirely possible that LOCALLY there are more clockwise spinning galaxies while there are more counter-clockwise spinning galaxies in another region.

@xpndblhero5170

Жыл бұрын

Exactly, so what he's saying is that in the "Observable Universe" there's more left handed spinning galaxies but I'm w/ you on the sample size..... That's like looking at 1 grain of sand and determining that all sand is that size and shape whenever we haven't even been on another beach or taken a single step away from the spot we're standing on.

we're not living in a dream, we're living in a nightmare!

Thank you for the video! ☺♥

my dreams are not as spectacular as my life itself

Wow! That is such a cool gadget. Nice video, I enjoyed it. I’ve been subbed for a while now, and I’ve learned a lot. Thank you, you never fail to make my day.

I NEED ONE OF THESE

@gevat1

Жыл бұрын

it's called LIMBO Top

Awesome video man! Really got me thinking, thank you.

Amazing episode!

I have two main thoughts on this subject: the first one is that we are always limited in our field of view of the universe by the speed of light and therefore we have no way of knowing whether more will be revealed once that light has gotten to us and/or our instruments for measuring it have gotten better and the second one is much more absurd and, if you've live as long as I have, you realize that the absurd is often reality and that is that perhaps this explains why so many humans and animals are right-handed/pawed. Observe your own cat, dog, and/or other mammal to observe that they have at least a slight predominance toward being right-handed/pawed.

I say shenanigans because it’s gotta be the most painful and most beautiful dream ever.

Great episode!

It wasn't his top. The top belonged to his wife. He had a diferent totem. The ending becomes completely diferent, if you remember that.

@1gorSouz4

Жыл бұрын

How, do you mean?

@toms7693

Жыл бұрын

@@1gorSouz4 Cobb's (Leonardo Dicaprio) totem was his wedding ring, Mel's (his wife) was the spinning top.

Correction: It's not that the top won't fall if in someone's dream. It's that Leo is the only person who knows HOW it falls. I've always felt the end of this movie was misleading, but the "feel" of the item being what's important is supported by another character's totem being a die. That character won't even let someone else hold it, because they may sense how the die is weighted. And Leo always makes sure to pick up his totem if someone walks in while it's spinning so that they can't see how it falls.

This episode made me ask more questions than what was answered!

I like your point about the "torque of the Universe" ; the way I personally see it, it's one of these fundamental imbalances we need to investigate, like for example why there was more matter than antimatter. Perhaps these two are related somehow? If they annihilated in an asymmetric manner, it could explain the torque "from the inside", without any need for external forces?

The reason the top stops in Inception is because his is special, it's made to stop on purpose, but he'll know he's in a dream because the dreamers conscious would not know the difference between a normal top and his special top. So in the dream, his top will keep spinning like any other top.

@bluethunder_

Жыл бұрын

🤓

@Dr.JustIsWrong

Жыл бұрын

Normal tops normally stop..

Can we just take a moment to appreciate how action lab went back in time to this dream to record this video?

What a mic drop at the end, ill be thinking about that all day!

Every Lucid Dreamer laughing knowing he can just count his fingers

Great episode. I'd like to hear more about the 7% galactic rotation direction difference. Did that study include rotation speed, galactic mass and dark energy?

@westonding8953

Жыл бұрын

Same. I am curious to know of potential errors and “missing” knowledge. For example, we cannot account for the galaxies that we cannot see due to being blocked by the plane of our own galaxy.

@goodfortune6399

Жыл бұрын

I think a sample size of 15000 out of trillions is probably not quite enough

@turolretar

Жыл бұрын

Act of god probably

@3zdayz

Жыл бұрын

just flipping the galaxies over changes their spin direction... doesn't mean that there was more torque in one direction, they've have billions of years to flip over and be in different alignment than their first inception.

@edd4310

Жыл бұрын

also, did they take into acount the unobservable part of the universe?

Great timing! Apparently, recently earth's rotation has sped up even though our moon is constantly slowing us down. One hypothesis is that the wobble may have evened out like what we see at the beginning of the video.

@son_of_hiskingdom5092

Жыл бұрын

I thought it was a funny idea to see what happens when I pray it happen. So I spoke to it like Jesus did the universe, and bam the earth is spinning faster.

@MadDragon75

Жыл бұрын

@@son_of_hiskingdom5092 😁

@MadDragon75

Жыл бұрын

@@son_of_hiskingdom5092 Stephen Colbert says it was because everybody pulled their arms in close to their body like when we're spinning on a office chair.. lol.

@son_of_hiskingdom5092

Жыл бұрын

@@MadDragon75 oh ok, well i dont know who Stephen Colbert is. but the chair thing sounds kinda fun.

@MadDragon75

Жыл бұрын

@@son_of_hiskingdom5092 He's a Late Night talk Show Host. I found it relatable and thought that was funny.

Ohhhh damnnnnn. It's so interestinggggggg. Thank you for making these videos, they are awesome!

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This applies to a weight moving off balance inside of a container. The weight is moving relative to the container, thus the container is moving relative to the weight. When gravity is involved and the friction of the container with an external surface is negligible, as it is when placed in the water, gravity holds the weight down to its point of lowest potential energy (or close enough) and the container rotates in the water instead because it would take more energy to lift the weight to a higher potential energy than it would for the container to rotate.

If it really works as shown it’s incredible. Where can I get one?

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

You can get one on our website, fearless toys, we make them. What do you make?

I'd love to see a graph of summed up angular momentum of galaxies in relation to z-score i.e. redshift - does it even out the further we look or does it stay roughly the same? I hope those scientist accounted for mass of the galaxies and not summed only their number.

One of the best channels on KZread!

If the universe is infinite there should be areas with higher or lower gradients of left or right angular momentum. Not only was their sample size small, it was focused on a portion of our presentation of the universe. This could be like looking at one country to get an average for skin color instead of the whole planet.

Even though it is often said that "The Universe is Isotropic and Homogeneous," it obviously is not. And that indicates it's initial condition was not, or there had to be a cause to bring about a change in state to account for the irregularities in the Universe.

@ilikewaffles3689

Жыл бұрын

Not you trying to make this about your god 😂

@jetison333

Жыл бұрын

It's isotropic and homogenous at big enough scales. It's similar to how water is isotropic and homogenous, even though it's made out of very dense atoms. Your correct that there needs to be some small initial instabilities for galaxies to form, and I believe thise can actually be explained by quantum mechanics.

@picksalot1

Жыл бұрын

​@@ilikewaffles3689 I invoked "causality," not god.

@ilikewaffles3689

Жыл бұрын

@@ryancairns2099 I don't have one, my guy. But that doesn't mean that your god is real.

@ilikewaffles3689

Жыл бұрын

@@ryancairns2099 no, no it doesn't. Like, not at all

James, do you have a link to your inception top? I've looked around for one that works really well, but haven't been able to find one.

@mthedemonhunter

Жыл бұрын

I agree! I have been looking for one as well. Where do we get them?!? *EDIT* Fearless toys makes them and it's $80.

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

@@mthedemonhunter Spot on!

Your best yet. Now I won't be able to go to sleep. My mind will be "spinning" on the universe's external torq idea. Good stuff Sir!

It's good to have science being explained in detail to me in my dream right now . 😊

I think the big bang was a result of a previous universe collapsing, which would also explain the angular momentum being precent from the start

@joonyjun7861

Жыл бұрын

But how would the first universe start?

@WeighedWilson

Жыл бұрын

@@joonyjun7861 starting fluid

Thanks for that video, but does anyone know where to buy that top? I realy couldn‘t find one.

@shanibres

Жыл бұрын

it's called LIMBO Top by Fearless Toys

Thank you for making me want to buy a top for $76 when I could’ve lived very happily never knowing it existed.

Very educational. Thanks!

Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather.

How do you tell the difference between a "right" and "left" spinning galaxy when there's no correct frame-of-reference?

@tim40gabby25

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely.

@hugofco2037

Жыл бұрын

With their "arms" aligned the same way, you can look for it at the example in the video at 5:01, with the video paused, both look the same but when you press play again you will notice.

@F_L_U_X

Жыл бұрын

@@hugofco2037 but if you were on the other side of the galaxy, it would be spinning in the opposite direction. Since there's no up and down in space, what frame-of-reference do we use?

@rollomaughfling380

Жыл бұрын

@@F_L_U_X Obviously, we use the frame of reference from the point where these measurements are taken, on (or near) Earth.

@Dr.JustIsWrong

Жыл бұрын

5:22 see figure 1

Cool vid thanks for posting !

I love your content!

This guy isn't a person.he is a Legend!

How did the big bang get angular momentum? God: It's all in the wrist.

Thank you for the video.

Such an intersting topic to discuss!

Nice :-) Where can I get a top like this?

@gevat1

Жыл бұрын

Ma Nishma Igal? Fearless Toys is the company that makes them, local guys.

Wouldn't you also have to account for differences in the mass of each galaxy? If the left hand rotating galaxies are les massive then wouldn't it make sense that there would be more of them?

@chdcris

Жыл бұрын

I guess with a small sample size you would. But with a sample size of 15000 the mass should average out over the samples... right?

@MagneticSyncopation

Жыл бұрын

@@chdcris Maybe it was for all galaxies of nearly equivalent mass?

@tolik75x

Жыл бұрын

Also, how certain are we that the sample taken for analysis accurately represents the rest of the universe? Maybe we're in a localized pocket where there are more of one kind than the other and the JWST will reveal others we haven't been able to see before.

@westonding8953

Жыл бұрын

I thought so too. But also we cannot account for the galaxies we cannot see due to being blocked by the view of our own galaxy.

@benner1320

Жыл бұрын

@@chdcris If I remember correctly 15000 galaxies is about 1/1000 % of the total amount of galaxies that we can see, let alone the amount of galaxies that there actually are. If the study was truly conducted as presented in this video, it's a useless study with bogus conclusions.

I would also like to know where to get one.. like everything in James's videos

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

We make them, look us up, Fearless Toys.

I'm still waiting for my top to arrive, but good to see that some backers already got theirs.

That is really interesting. That being said, did the study try to account for the galaxies on the plane of our galaxy which we can never see?

@schmarcel4238

Жыл бұрын

that shouldn't matter

@chriswebster24

Жыл бұрын

@@schmarcel4238 It matters to me, dammit! It matters to me 😡

@westonding8953

Жыл бұрын

@@schmarcel4238 statistically are you sure? There might be 7% more that spin right in aggregate.

@schmarcel4238

Жыл бұрын

@@westonding8953 but why would the galaxies in our plane be so special as to spin in the opposite direction of all other galaxies? They should most likely show the same distribution of angular distribution as the rest of the universe

@westonding8953

Жыл бұрын

@@schmarcel4238 There is the "Axis of Evil" which he explains in another video. That is unexplained. This could possibly be involved in that. They totally could have a different distribution of angular momentum.

Do you have a place I can buy this?

@gevat1

Жыл бұрын

I can't tell you where, but can tell you that it's made by Fearless Toys. You'll find it there.

Gaznfeld experiment, lucid dreaming + reality checks, wbtb tech - you’re welcome for this rabbit hole. Amazing stuff.

The little motor pulled apart at 2:00 looks like the haptic feedback/vibrating device common in phones and cheaply available on ebay etc.

@Dr.JustIsWrong

Жыл бұрын

Because it is.

Can you give me a Link to one of These, since i want to make Sure to buy a real one

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

We make them! They are called LIMBO, check out our channel or simply go to our website you can get them there.

Are we living in Leonardo DiCaprio’s dream?!?!

HOORAY! I can now watch it!

You Sir are excellent!

Where can i buy one

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

On our website, we're Fearless Toys and we make those. James must have forgotten to mentino that...silly guy. It's called LIMBO TOP.

If we are then i guess my nightmare finally ended 🥹

Thanks for the great videos, theyre informative and fun to watch. The following questions are genuine and not intended to be snarky or disrespectful . That being said. Pertaining to the Top, isn’t it the same phenomenon that causes a spinning egg(raw, in shell)to start rotating after it is abruptly stopped and released? How many levels of motion are taken into account when figuring angular momentum. I think you touched on two in the video but aren’t there much more? The Earth spinning on its axis, the Terra/Luna binary system “spinning” around the Sun, the Solar System “spinning” around the center of the Milkyway, etc…. All of this motion has to have an effect, right? Also, by the rules of the movie, don’t you have someone else’s Top?

Once I saw those wired, I was like “oh it’s motorized”

I need to buy this top. Where can I get one

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

You really do need to! you can get them on our website, it's called LIMBO by Fearless Toys

@phs125

Жыл бұрын

@@fearlesstoys3474 wow. At that price id rather not know if I'm truly awake. Sorry, but it's wayyyy out of my budget...

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

@@phs125 shoot us a msg on the website chat

If you have energy inside you can trade one speed for another. Like what satellites do with reaction wheels. So you could be inside a non-rotating container and use an engine to spin something you have thus generating a reaction force on the container making it begin to rotate. Likely what happened in the first pico-seconds of the big bang. (if there was a big bang, not so likely now!)

Sometimes,you just have to let go & embrace what you've become

Wow the final conlcusion was very thought provoking.

I never knew being too smart can lead you to lose your damn mind! No we are not in a dream.

@Dudleymiddleton

Жыл бұрын

Nightmare, more like! That's if I can even watch the bloody video.

@rollomaughfling380

Жыл бұрын

"No we are not in a dream." Bullshit. Eliphalet Oram Lyte published a scientific paper in 1852 conclusively proving otherwise. If you'd taken the time to do your research before spreading this misinformation, you would have found his seminal proof on the simulation hypothesis. But I guess it's up to others to do your legwork for you, and I'll give you this, this one time only so you can find it in your university library. The title of the work is "Row, Row, Row Your Boat," and it proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that "life is but a dream." Damn the lengths I have to go to bring some sense into the world . . .

@Dr.JustIsWrong

Жыл бұрын

@@rollomaughfling380 then what's a dream?

I want to buy this to fool people …

Loving the bun!

Interesting video! Do you have a link to purchase one of these Inception tops?

@fearlesstoys3474

Жыл бұрын

We make them! Fearless Toys 🥒🫐🥝🥬

This topic is strong evidence of the Creator's existence, because randomness like the Big Bang does not create an accurate cosmic system, and thank you very much for your effort and explanation on various topics. I learned a lot from you

@WeighedWilson

Жыл бұрын

This is strong evidence that cheese is good.

That's cool! :D Too bad you can't buy this thing anywhere. There's a gadget called "limbo" somewhere, but that's a kickstarter thing where you have to pre-order and wait a year...

@gevat1

Жыл бұрын

Yup seems like it's LIMBO. It's available on their website.

@snapsna3567

Жыл бұрын

@@gevat1 I can only find a pre-order and I don't want that. I hate waiting.

@gevat1

Жыл бұрын

@@snapsna3567 The one I'm looking at is not pre-order, search for fearless toys it's the name of the company it'll bring you to the right place

@NewEra90000

Жыл бұрын

Scam/ comment ad warning. Please don't fall for the comment and replies above. Its a scammy marketing strategy in which the main goal is to create fake hype for the product they're trying to sell and by redirecting you to their own brand as if it's unique, when there are actually millions of other brands selling the same thing.

BRUHS, I NEED THIS! where do i get one? I cant find one that doesn't need a base

This video was more interesting Loved it axn lab❤❤

I feel that the sample of galaxies was too small to draw meaningful conclusions when considered as a percentage of the total number of galaxies in the known universe.

@JarutheDamaja

Жыл бұрын

Thought the same but probability theory would say no.

The study sample size is biased to the area we inhabit, it's a flawed study.

@sebastianb1910

Жыл бұрын

Exactly what I was thinking

@Dr.JustIsWrong

Жыл бұрын

Okay, go count a different area..

@jaredhouston4223

Жыл бұрын

@@Dr.JustIsWrong Did you just take offence to something factual?

@Dr.JustIsWrong

Жыл бұрын

@@jaredhouston4223 _"Did you just take offence to something factual?"_ Nope but it sure sounds like you did. "OMG! they had the audacity to begin studying cosmology without waiting for FTL with hypergalactic range exceeding 13Gly, then they could just drive there and look and not be lying to everybody all the time!" "Flawed" is comparative word. Usually used as a pejorative. *_Nothing_* is perfect. "Best possible" isn't perfect.. If 'best possible' = flawed to you, then you're in for a long, boring, sad, life rejecting knowledge..

@jaredhouston4223

Жыл бұрын

@@Dr.JustIsWrong The study is flawed, your emotions are getting the better of you. I'm allowed to disagree with the the study, it's healthy for the process. However, if you're implying that I'm discrediting the work to even bring up the problem, you don't have to continue to argue with me. The work that has been done is greatly appreciated.

Interesting !! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 Awesome video 👍🏻

This is so amazing and then tying it to space is even crazier haha

With only 15,000 galaxies observed out of the hundreds-of-billions galaxies throughout the observable universe, I would be very surprised if the numbers came out to be 50/50. With only a 7% difference, I would say it's extremely likely that the other 7% can be found in galaxies not observed. 15,000 out of the 200 billion galaxies is only 0.0000075%. To claim this is any type of scientific anomaly is greatly misrepresented- in my opinion anyway.

@redryder3721

Жыл бұрын

I agree, it's like flipping a coin 100 times and expecting it to be heads exactly 50 times.

@billr3053

Жыл бұрын

With a population size of 200,000,000,000 and a sample size of 15,000, the margin of error is 0.8%, 95% of the time where opinion is evenly split. From an online Margin of Error Calculator. Don't ask me to explain it all. I failed statistics class miserably. But it had to do with how many samples one needs to test (let's say light bulbs) to be confident about the failure rate. So according to the above numbers, this IS a scientific anomaly. Or at the very least, highly significant rather than randomly wrong.

@pwill4real855

Жыл бұрын

@@billr3053 I see your overall point. But usually sample sizes needed to be done randomly and without bias. But I think if you're only sampling nearby galaxies that we are able to see and measure- that introduces a bias based on proximity. It's like taking a sample of a population from only one part of a country and calling it statistically accurate. But that's just my opinion-- as i could be very wrong. I guess I should actually read the paper.

@billr3053

Жыл бұрын

@@pwill4real855 Very good point. I had not considered that the sample was likely & unavoidably "nearby". It's the best we can do.

@pwill4real855

Жыл бұрын

@@billr3053 completely agree. It’s all we have. The study is definitely interesting. They should repeat the study with 15k new galaxies. It’d be interesting to see. I love this stuff. I hope they keep going

Please make an another hindi channle in which you can dub yours videos in hindi Please