Special Christmas deal! Every purchase of a 2-year plan will get you 4 additional months free. Go to nordvpn.com/binkov and use our coupon binkov at checkout.

@pyeitme508

3 жыл бұрын

Cool

@mehmetmetegunes7162

3 жыл бұрын

Well as much as a recall turkey use them on syria and destroy 1 of su25 and the if its true goverment says s400 can't detect it

@christopherhoffer6643

3 жыл бұрын

Usa vs Eu and China(2017)

@christiandauz3742

3 жыл бұрын

Hey Blinky, can you redo your Hypothetical Polish scenario or do another WW2 or WW1 scenario with a big emphasis on Drones?

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

Turkey uses laser weapon technology to shoot down Chinese UAV Wing Loong II in Libya ......... Really important news often goes unnoticed. They occur, no one notices them, but the events mentioned in this news often have consequences that later, having developed to a large scale, make observers gasp - and it’s good, if only out of surprise. Alexander Timokhin explains. www.armyrecognition.com/weapons_defence_industry_military_technology_uk/turkey_uses_laser_weapon_technology_to_shoot_down_chinese_uav_wing_loong_ii_in_libya.html

Binkov: How to stop drones? My mind: *Drone dogfight*

@mustafakiris6985

3 жыл бұрын

That would be cool to watch. 🙂

@edwardchong7212

3 жыл бұрын

@@mustafakiris6985 War thunder sh*t gets real

@rorybrown7632

3 жыл бұрын

Only a matter of time

@ravik007ggn

3 жыл бұрын

Drog fight..

@julianshepherd2038

3 жыл бұрын

A.I. controlled drone fights.

Currently : our missile is almost as expensive as this drone Ww2: our grenade is the most expensive thing we own including ourselves

@ff5eddie400

3 жыл бұрын

Currently: we have very few casualties and collateral damage. WW2 : 85 million casualties and half the world is a smoking hole in the ground.

@Joesolo13

3 жыл бұрын

@@ff5eddie400 Nukes rather raised the stakes for the whole thing. Even WW2 they held off on using chemical weapons for the most part out of fear.

@QualityPen

3 жыл бұрын

@@ff5eddie400 There’s plenty of collateral damage anywhere the enemy puts up a serious fight. Many cities in Syria, Ukraine, and Chechnya were reduced to rubble during constant fighting. Iraq mostly fought out in the open and lost there, sparing a lot of collateral damage. The ongoing insurgencies have been easier to deal with without heavy ordinance. I think Afghanistan was more or less counter insurgency from the start. The potential for mass casualty wars exists, but the proper mix of diplomacy and deterrence have kept larger nations out of direct conflict with one another since WW2.

@ff5eddie400

3 жыл бұрын

@@QualityPen 85million casualties ??? And what drone has specs to carry 8,000lb of ordinances like the hundreds of b17 of ww2. As bad as war is today, it holds no candles to ww2 so far in all wars since....Cheers

@taranamock9512

3 жыл бұрын

@@ff5eddie400 Ww2 was a real benchmark in technological advances and mass destruction. Since then people have been trying to curb war away from total destruction. Only countries that can afford to make this expensive compromise in tech vs lives do it. And even when less lethal tactics are carried out by world powers that could end their adversaries easily in total inhalation, the rest of the planet chides them for being more advanced and thus saving lives in the combat by using high tech weapons. People don’t recall the mass distractions that crippled the planet as a viable tactic against the enemy. Imagine if carpet bombing was still a tactic. Less countries may be at war today if they knew this was the end option.

Drones alone is not everything. It has to be used in coordination with other systems and forces. Turkey and Azerbaijan, backed by Turkey, uses the drones in combination with Turkey's own EW (Electronic Warfare) systems. There are tens of footages of Turkish drones destroying ACTIVE (you can see their radar spinning etc.) pantsirs, S-300 and other AA systems, to the point it has become a meme. However, i think it would be fair to point out that Haftar, assad and the armenians did/do not have a multilayered AA defense net backed with other defensive EW systems, experience and professionalism. However, the drones have proven that they can be DEVASTATING, slowly whittling down an exposed enemy. During the Armenian-Azerbaijan war alone you can easily count up to ~1500 casualties for the Armenian side through drone footages alone. It's crazy.

@pacus123

3 жыл бұрын

Can you please provide a link. I have not seen a single video of any S300 system being destroyed. I've seen 1 video of a Panstir being hit (NOT DESTROYED) by Israeli drones but that's it.

@AKIN180

3 жыл бұрын

Europes whas laughing at Turkish TB2 drones they called him cheap Turkish drone,

@Home0653

3 жыл бұрын

@@AKIN180 no they are on the Line lol

@Mustafa-wc1gb

3 жыл бұрын

@@pacus123 kzread.info/dash/bejne/dWSkxcSeg9CWg9o.html&bpctr=1608543011 In this video, Azerbaijan shooted firstly Harop secondly Bayraktar and then Su-25 missile. Also you can watch : kzread.info/dash/bejne/Zn2GpaZ-pc_ef7w.html&bpctr=1608543299

@user-lc7jy4jd4y

3 жыл бұрын

@@pacus123 Man are you serious? there are a lot of videos on the internet You don't know anything or don't want to know You must be Armenian, your pain is great.

Drone's are so terrifying Binkov's voice shakes on the beginning : D

If the Armored Core series has taught me anything, it's that giant mechs with quirky pilots are a hard counter to drones in any situation but a sequel hook.

@nobodyherepal3292

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed

@Errorcutive

3 жыл бұрын

P U L V I L I Z E R

@CoffeePotato

3 жыл бұрын

@animationeer Gotta reach deep sometimes.

@samualking636

3 жыл бұрын

Back to the Nest Raven

@zippyparakeet1074

3 жыл бұрын

yesss!! weirdly designed mechs piloted by high school teens are easily the hard counter to any modern weaponry

I just tried to find this topic and BOOM this was uploaded video 2 minutes ago.

@rajatdani619

3 жыл бұрын

This happens a lot of time. There's a scientific term to this phenomenon I forgot its name.😅

2020 BC: Is Iron changing Warfare? And how to stop it?

@VashtheStampede007

3 жыл бұрын

Much of the world was still in bronze or Stone Age in 2020BC lol

Armenia: *Sweats nervously*

@mark-1rc502

3 жыл бұрын

America Used Drone Swarming in the 80’s Iraq war I think to confuse Iraqi Radar and allow some appache to Blow up a Radar site to give the Jets a Corridor . Just because you don’t hear much about what they have or have not amd don’t parade it on a truck In public dosmt mean they ain’t got nothing. Others like China and Russia are Catching in tech or Stealing tech but you should never dismiss them .

@nickdimopoulos4052

3 жыл бұрын

@@mark-1rc502 he said armenia. Not america

@mark-1rc502

3 жыл бұрын

Nick D 😱🤗 Sorry Should have gone to specsavers 😇

@ChadSimplicio

3 жыл бұрын

Armenians should have every right to sweat nervously, especially if the Azeri takes advantage of their newly gained territory to further bolster their military, & plan to take Southern Armenia to connect their enclave to the mainland. Not even "System of a Down" can save Armenia.

@TTTupload

3 жыл бұрын

@@mark-1rc502 they did by apache helicopters not drones as far as i know

If i had a penny everytime something was meant to end Tanks...

3 жыл бұрын

What was the last war decided by fighting between tanks? 1973 Yom Kippur War? In just about every war since then the deciding factor was high-tech air power, low-tech third world infantry/technical warfare, or how good the occupying side was at counter-insurgency (usually terrible).

@michealbloomington4767

3 жыл бұрын

Tanks don't need to be ended, they are already irrelevant.

@TheDinofan2

3 жыл бұрын

Drone are just an other element of air superiority, tanks were always weaks against air force and artillery. Beside that tanks are still use in modern conflicts even in urban warfare

@ardagurbuz6924

3 жыл бұрын

@@michealbloomington4767 They are still pretty solid infantry support vehicles if you have sufficient air cover.

@freddyd1783

3 жыл бұрын

You could buy a tank im sure

Saw a concept video once for a small, flying drone equipped with a camera, sophisticated facial recognition software, and a small explosive charge. The assassination possibilities are terrifying.

@XimCines

3 жыл бұрын

Nicolas Maduro has thumbs down on your comment.

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

its not concept, turkey use for a long time KARGU-2 kamikaze drones with facial recognition and artificial intel. Just google it

@bocadelcieloplaya3852

3 жыл бұрын

small drone dropping small heat-guided anti-personnel munition. take out enemy individually.

@bezahltersystemtroll5055

3 жыл бұрын

not if you wear a mask and chicken wire around your head :D

@pogo1140

3 жыл бұрын

Problem with facial recognition software, it works best with white males, if you're target is black or better yet an asian woman, the drone will never find it's target or has a 50% chance of targeting the wrong person.

Is that really hard and imposible to use bayraktar tb2 footage for thls video? Speaks about Turkish drone systems and use predator footage lol

@Hermania_

3 жыл бұрын

Biz Irkçı değiliz , sen KÜRTSÜN

@emre5339

3 жыл бұрын

@@Hermania_ Hayır sen ırkçısın.

@Hermania_

3 жыл бұрын

@@emre5339 adamın pfp sinde yazanı söyledim

@asker9172

3 жыл бұрын

@@Hermania_ ne diyon oglim.... i gelip cahil cahil yorum atiorsunuz.....git önce ingilizce ögren, anlamadin seylerede sebze olma

@nissangtrnismo512

3 жыл бұрын

@@emre5339 mal

i am terrified when Drone are going to fully use AI and the only defence between life and death is the degree of correctness on their IFF

@gamehacker2801

3 жыл бұрын

They are already in use . Some drones automatically chose target

@ANWRocketMan

3 жыл бұрын

It's too late for that. IFF in hum,ans isn't too great either TBH. I don't think it will change much. Counter-drone tech will be developed and deployed in greater and greater numbers. The war in the Caucasus I think showed they can have a good impact, but they are not impervious. And to the nations who paid attention, they will likely learn a lot from that and other conflicts going on where drones are used. Almost like the Spanish Civil War served as a big learning tool for many nations like the USSR and German Empire/Reich(they mean the same thing essentially) whatever you prefer calling it when it came to armoured vehicles and co-operation with air support. I suspect we will see a larger proliferation of CIWS-like system for ground use. AAA guns essentially with shorter range targeting system that can quickly and effectively engage incoming drones. p.s. I made this comment at the start of the video. Will update soon. Turns out the video pretty much says what I thought, just in far more detail and a more entertaining method of delivery :D

@justanotherlegend3315

3 жыл бұрын

American drones chose target selected by an algorithm

@ANWRocketMan

3 жыл бұрын

@@justanotherlegend3315 Algorithms are notoriously unpredictable, sometimes they behave very strangely under certain conditions. Although when they are used within design parameters they are quite stable. Humans are very good at not following instructions and limitations though.

@cyrilchui2811

3 жыл бұрын

Drones are already flying on pre-set flight path, so they just continue even when jammed. I guess the only device that need human control is the camera. As for targeting, if you are driving a Toyota land cruiser, better switch it into something more fancy, such as a Porsche or Ferrari, because AI or human would simply assume you are a drug dealer, not worthy of a missile....

Turkey is now moving on to developing warship drones.

@themengene1132

3 жыл бұрын

Bro you are everywhere is someone talk about Turkey :)

@bob-wo3ir

3 жыл бұрын

Didn't all the drones came from Erdugan ass ?

@miraith_2341

3 жыл бұрын

@@bob-wo3ir yes yes brother from our precious Erdogun arms factory

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

@@bob-wo3ir they came from your mothers puzy

@a.b1651

3 жыл бұрын

@@bob-wo3ir no , from Macron shithole

Armenia: I can give spoilers on this subject!

@sockaccount8116

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, spoilers are to have strong allies and that we should all nuke Turkey

@DeadManRising36

3 жыл бұрын

@@sockaccount8116 sour loser

@dwightdayne4932

3 жыл бұрын

@@sockaccount8116 lol I'm pretty sure Armenia is the only country in the world who is ally with US and Russia at the same time and getting free weapons from both sides. But they were so in the wrong in this case and nobody had a swing to help them. Just understand this, every country in the world recognises Karabakh as Azerbaijani land except Armenia. Even Armenia doesn't say it's their land.

@turancbirgenc4963

3 жыл бұрын

@Hello There I think Turkey also has the nukes

@usa_bruce4295

3 жыл бұрын

@@turancbirgenc4963 They cant produce their own, they lack the Infastrcture

You know, I don't know how exactly, but I strongly believe in the resilience of good old Flak cannons!

LOVE your videos. Have a great Christmas Binkov!

Each Bayraktar TB'2 drone costs just 1.35 million dollars..

@rorybrown7632

3 жыл бұрын

Source? $5 million according to the source I read

@lottintv3518

3 жыл бұрын

@@rorybrown7632 no it's 1,5 million. Because Ukraine ordered 50 of them.

@efthymiosanagnostos7427

3 жыл бұрын

@@rorybrown7632 5 million is export cost

@rorybrown7632

3 жыл бұрын

No sources? Because the below source says Ukraine made a deal with Turkey to buy 6 TB2 systems with ammunition for $69 million... And even if $5 million is the export cost and domestic cost is $1.3 that would mean it is a rip off and Turkey is overcharging everyone... www.defensenews.com/unmanned/2019/01/14/turkish-firm-to-sell-drones-to-ukraine-in-69-million-deal/

@MrAizatazmi

3 жыл бұрын

@@rorybrown7632 can get cheaper per unit if buy more

the problem is Pantsir is not able to see TB2 drone on top of it...

Love this format!! Thank you for doing all the research.

What good are they anyway, you need a 8 kill streak to use one

@apotato6278

3 жыл бұрын

Seriously man, real life isn't like Call of Duty. The servers are much bigger so 8 kills shouldn't be any problems. If an American High Schooler can pull it off then so can a trained soldier!

@conservativedemocracyenjoyer

3 жыл бұрын

@@apotato6278 had me in the first half,, ngl

Armenia: My army is invincible. Azerbaijan: Yeah, for sure. Hold my TB-2

Nothing is unstoppable, and there are no permanent "one size fits all" or "I win" solutions in warfare. This has always been and will always be the case. However, there are kind of golden ages for certain weapon systems and drones may enjoy some of that right now. Counter- measures are well on the way though, e.g. lasers (and high rate of fire AA- guns are making a slow comeback, too).

@dijdave8584

2 жыл бұрын

Jamming, emp & DEW weaponry will cheaply & easily delete these drones, any aerial attack in fact. Microwave lasers are the best. Drones are only useful against civilians & poor & incompetent govts. Drones are also only deployed by war criminal regimes.

@pultsari9036

2 жыл бұрын

@Lake I don't disagree with everything, but I kinda disagree on the counter measures being totally parallel to conventional anti air capabilities. There are totally capable AA systems in use already, but they are not cost effective. It doesn't make much sense to launch a 500000$ missile against a 50000$ drone, even if you hit every time. In my opinion what is coming is close range systems with very low cost per downed drone, like lasers and new hi- tech AA- guns. These are not very effective against conventional air power, mainly because of the low range.

@pultsari9036

2 жыл бұрын

@Lake Well that's where we disagree, I don't see that coming at all. Short range anti drone measures yes, but in my opinion they are of very limited use against conventinal air power.

@pultsari9036

2 жыл бұрын

@Lake No I'm not saying that, modern conventional air power has to evolve as well (and it is). Of course it's possible there will be game changers in anti air in general, but I just don't see them being the same ones that are going to provide cost effective counter to drones. In addition to lasers, for example Bofors and Rheinmetall are already providing high rate of fire AA- guns that not only have computerized fire control, but also automatically programmable shells shot per shot. Mode of fuse (delay, proximity, impact, delayed impact), submunitions angle of cone (tungsten pellets) etc. Great and relatively economical against drones, but hopelessly out of range for anything else than ground attack jets and helicopters. As for lasers, no matter how high power lasers you build and how well you manage to fight the dissipation in the athmosphere, it's still a line of sight weapon that requires a linear connection between the source and the target. Earth's curvature will set a hard upper limit for it, unless you fire it from... an aircraft :) Both conventional planes and drones will be around for the foreseeable future (and integrating already in 5th gen fighters like F- 35), and so is anti air in a constant race with them. My point really was only that no matter how novel the drones are right now and how successful they seem to be, they are not invincible, not even close. Summa summarum; since WW2 at the latest, combined arms has been the way to go and that's the way it's going to be for our lifetime at least.

@pultsari9036

2 жыл бұрын

@Lake Before you accuse me of constructing a strawman, take a look at the text on the thumbnail of this video. "Are drones unstoppable?". I think I have made many reasonable arguments why this is not the case, yet you don't seem to acknowledge hardly any of them. Like I said, drones will be around and integrated into conventional air power via networking, but they are not going to replace fighter-bomber jets during our lifetime. This conversation has been getting circular. If I may I would like to accuse you too of some fallacy that I cannot prove, like you couldn't prove the one you accused me of. You seem to be so heavily invested, more likely emotionally than economically in drones being "the great equalizer" between strong and weak airforces and negating the whole power of balance, that you don't want to see the points against it. So my guess is you are ideologically against a strong air power, likely the strongest one there is i.e. NATO and just can't let go of your wishful thought that drones will negate their superiority. Drones will be bigger and better equipped in the future, and finally autonomous, but at that stage they are not really drones any more from the particular point of view we have been discussing them here; they won't be cheap and easy to produce and maintain.

Small conflict with poor Electric warfare and AA capability : Yes Major power conflict such as East Asia Quad Alliance , NATO : No

3 жыл бұрын

Russia-provided Syrian air defence is showing zero ability to stop Israeli and Turkish airpower in Syria.

@rhodium1096

3 жыл бұрын

@ How many drones and cruise missile have been shot down?....no system is 100% reliable...there are many factors included crew operators...I have seen palestinian rockets fell in Israel despite Iron Dome..

3 жыл бұрын

@@rhodium1096 Drones are stupidly cheap, so what if some of them don't get through? That's the point - losing a bunch of drones is just some numbers in military budget nobody cares about; losing actual soldiers in large numbers makes wars politically toxic. Even for non-democratic countries like Russia, they can't afford to keep losing soldiers (and so it has been lying to its public about loses, but you can only hide so much).

@rhodium1096

3 жыл бұрын

@ Not so cheap..a Harop Loitering drone cost 10M, TB2 cost 5M, Orbiter 2M-7M...Predator 15M...Global Hawk 200M

@enderiskender2977

3 жыл бұрын

@@rhodium1096 They are price performance kings. TB2s destroyed much more then their worth even if few of them were shot down. And if you add moral and trained personel cost to already weaker opponent it makes it clearer how op drones are against manned systems.

This video should be a 20 min compilation of AAA and SAM firing

@Edin116

3 жыл бұрын

It's Ironic that Drones are such a threat that the US Military is considering using SPAAGs (Self Propelled Anti-Air Guns), for Company/Battalion defense, which they have considered obsolete since the use of the Patriot Missile System.

@Its_shiki_time4876

3 жыл бұрын

@@Edin116 they what?!

@TheNicestPig

3 жыл бұрын

@@Edin116 Yep. The US had no SPAAG since the what? M247? While the Russians still operates the Tunguska Hybrid SAM/AAA system.

@VisibilityFoggy

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheNicestPig - Yeah, the Sgt. York would have had to be the last one. It was made by Ford Defense, if you want a nostalgic view, ha. Anywho, for the poster who wanted a compilation of AA guns firing, here's one of my favorites: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fGRsmbeRhdeccrA.html

@eastsouth9548

3 жыл бұрын

@@Edin116 USA has Lasers now, to deal with drone. USA has always been screaming Drones are a threat since the 2000. Russia has never taken the drone threat seriously, has paid the price. Russian air defense system put to shame in syria and armenia.

if drones are gonna make the army of the future one grounded on spam techniques, the zerg-rush will be reinvigorated.

@houghwhite411

3 жыл бұрын

I'm sure Russia with they "Rush B" drone will be superior in warfare

@RAiNfORAiNbOW

3 жыл бұрын

yeah thats basically why people who say mbts are useless are wrong. Balance is the key

I think the biggest problem with AI-directed drones is that they have little to no ability to determine the difference between friend and foe. Sure, IFF systems may be vital in modern air-to-air combat but they have malfunctioned before even though it was never on the scale of the IFF malfunctions shown in Ace Combat 7. However, AC7 has shown that the biggest advantage humans have over drones is that they are able to adapt to IFF malfunctions while drones have no such capability. This became especially important as the conflict in the game became an absolute CF with very few people knowing who's on whose side but the drones taking this handicap especially hard. While the game may be an artificial construct, the point still stands that any belief in a "clean" war is little more than a fantasy and while drones may make it easier to kill that thing over there, human judgement is always necessary to decide whether or not you should.

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

Ai directed drones can detect and the final decision can be left to an operator

@user-bl3si3kq6x

Жыл бұрын

Doesn’t matter after the first shot either way. There’s a video of a blue on blue air strike. The pilots rarely miss their shot AND have a chance to correct for FF

@Atmatan_Kabbaher

5 ай бұрын

That can detect between friend and foe just fine. What they can't determine is between foe and civilian.

How about Libya, where the LNA had much more and more modern equipment, lots of foreign suppliers (France, UAE, Egypt), more manpower but still lost to the people that only had turkish drones as outside support?

@thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361

3 жыл бұрын

France is not even in Libya lol And if you say France is in Libya proof ?

@chraman169

3 жыл бұрын

@abdo abdo Yes, noticed that.

@cemyurdakul1128

3 жыл бұрын

and LNA had drones too...

@patnutoris4054

3 жыл бұрын

@@thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361 So you mean a crashed french plane with soldiers is not proof enough for you?

@QWERTY-gp8fd

3 жыл бұрын

@@patnutoris4054 where is the crashed french plane??

the ability to have loitering munitions in the area for hours and hours with the ability to easily overwhelm air defenses on the cheap is scary as a war fighter.

9:54 I guess the russian/ukrain war changed that. It especially showed the defencive role of drones.

@gabrieljoseph6310

2 жыл бұрын

UAV interceptor kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZZaTxpaAgsLUeKw.html

@WraithMagus

2 жыл бұрын

I was wondering how many people were also shown this one in the recommend bar at this point, not realizing this was over a year old when I clicked. The part about how drones could all be jammed by a modern military and therefore lose all effectiveness, or how the Bayraktar could be shot down too much to be worth the price didn't age too well.

Very topical, crucially important topic, well done Binkov!

That missile launch at 19:18 looks so darn cool. It always surprises me how much the "small inexpensive" drones cost. A drone which costs one million dollars is supposed to be inexpensive. I'd think it would be possible to make a drone with reasonably good capabilities for a few tens of thousands of dollars. Of course I only have experience with hobby drones so I must be missing some important features which drive up the price.

@wpww3343

2 жыл бұрын

The optronics and communications systems are on a whole different (cost) level. That, and the engines, I assume..

@ddegn

2 жыл бұрын

@@wpww3343 I'm guessing the it's hard to get the exact specs for the million dollar systems so it's hard to do a direct comparison with hobby grade stuff. I'm just amazed at how good hobby grade stuff is these days. One example is the transmitted video from the DJI FPV drone. It's pretty darn amazing. The way the drone will just sit in one place in the air is also really amazing. I flew the thing in a 45 mph wind and it hardly cared. Compared to the tech I used 40 years ago, this new stuff seems like science fiction.

@wpww3343

2 жыл бұрын

@@ddegn Absolutely agree. My Parrot Disco blew my mind when I bought it. And I can absolutely see "hobby" enthusiast drones get close to the military stuff if one would throw enough money at it

@ddegn

2 жыл бұрын

@@wpww3343 I just watched the video *"(NSFW) Ukrainian Quadcopter Makes Direct Hit On Russian Proxy With Mini Bomb (FNN 13)."* The video talks about how consumer drones are being weaponized. I'm sure you've seen things like this, I just thought it was interesting to see this video right after our exchange about the topic. I wonder how the bomb was able to hit so precisely in the video. I'd be surprised if the bomb was guided. I think it's more likely it was a crazy lucky shot or it's also possible the video was faked. Warning, the video is kind of disturbing. Have a good new year.

@alexburke1899

2 жыл бұрын

@@ddegn it could have been a thermal warhead as soon as it was activated it would head for a heat source. That’s just a wild guess though because I remember seeing that video. In theory if you had the mount off of a plane or helicopter and the drone could lift it you could probably rig it to that and remotely deploy it with a button.

Turkey combined electronic warfare and drones to win across 3 regions.

@aslanmikail1504

3 жыл бұрын

@Julius Caesar The problem with the Taliban is that you cannot differentiate between Taliban and civilian. Taliban hide as civilians between civilians. They conduct guerilla hit and run tactics before returning to a civilian state. Conventional armies move in formation and settle in as a unit. It is clear who is who. So it is also easy to hit them with drone strikes. Also, military vehicles are easier to identify than civilian vehicles. Thus, the comparison you make with the Taliban is like compring apples and oranges. What makes drones very good is their cheapness. You can make a lot of them making it impossible for anti-air systems to shoot them all down, unlike airplanes, which are big and expensive. Armenia didn't only lose due to being poor and having poor leadership, Armenia lost because there is no defense against a swarm of drones, especially if you combine the fleet with Israeli kamikaze drones which have the purpose of distracting anti-air.

@aslanmikail1504

3 жыл бұрын

@Julius Caesar Oh yeah, exactly.

@veyselkerematak9897

3 жыл бұрын

@Julius Caesar you are talking about other drones. İn afganisthan US use mq predators. İn syria Ankas in it

@mikebar42

3 жыл бұрын

Who did turkey use drones on?

@veyselkerematak9897

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikebar42 armenia libian hafter forces syrian regime

Bayraktar TB2 injured Russia. That's what I understand of this video.

@srikrishna2561

3 жыл бұрын

Really ? eurasiantimes.com/russia-shot-down-a-total-of-nine-turkish-bayraktar-drones-near-its-armenia-military-base-russian-media-reports/

@TayTay-fn6cx

3 жыл бұрын

@@srikrishna2561 And shooting down 9 drones is a big accomplishment? After losing so many AIR defence systems? Don't make me laugh

@enderiskender2977

3 жыл бұрын

@@srikrishna2561 even if its true and i am not saying it is compared to what is lost it terible deal for Russia and Armenia anyway.

@turancbirgenc4963

3 жыл бұрын

@@srikrishna2561 propaganda

@user-lc7jy4jd4y

3 жыл бұрын

@@srikrishna2561 Liar hahahahahahahaha LOL🤣🤣🤣🤣 Only 1 Bayraktar drone fell during the Karabakh war That Drone suicide drone was flying at low altitude in search of satellite enemies. So if they want, they can't hit I guess you are Armenian, your pain is too big, you liar.

Judging by what's going on Ukraine the most feared weapons are surveillance drones and artillery.

Speaking of Armenia/Azerbaijan, Binkov should do a video analyzing how accurate his video last year was in light of the recent war

@tolunaybas227

3 жыл бұрын

Was not accurate at all actually.. Azerbaijan had a much easier win that he did not estimate

@stafer3

3 жыл бұрын

@@tolunaybas227 At the start of all those videos you have always disclaimer about “no allies allowed”. So this situation isn’t comparable with his scenario. Pay attention next time.

@tamerlanagayev785

3 жыл бұрын

@@stafer3 its a war. Alla neighbours gets involved. Turkey backed Azerbaijan. Iran and Russia backed Armenia. Georgia closed its borders woth Armenia to stop military aid from Russia so Russia used Iran instead. And Armenia wasnt ready for drones and they underastimated Azerbaijani special forces who took Shusha in 1 day. Never underastimate your enemy. And I forgot to mention that Israel backed Azerbaijan bcs Iran backed Armenia.

@stafer3

3 жыл бұрын

@@tamerlanagayev785 But you do understand how such video would be just speculation on what allies you get in that hypothetical conflict and not comparison between actual countries, right? 90% of his videos would be “oh, they are in NATO so they would win”. That’s why he always have those conditions at the start “no nukes, no allies, same morale etc.”. Like in this particular example. Russia announced they will protect official borders of Armenia. So from that wording alone was completely clear that Armenia will lose since their main ally didn’t want to back them up. Delete just one word “official” from that sentence and suddenly Russia’s position would change and with that outcome of that conflict. But that would no longer be video about Armenia/Azerbaijan. It would be video about Russian and Turkish coalitions. And you can just copy paste that to all hypothetical scenarios. Who would win Syrian civil war? Depends on Russian and Turkish involvement. Who would win in Libyan civil war? Depends on Russian and Turkish involvement.

@theunfortunate2597

3 жыл бұрын

His videos are never accurate...

Well Turkey is sending satillite data link with Gokturk 2 and it will has (Synthetic Aparture Radar) satiltle next year Gokturk 3 so the Drone jamming will be even more complicated task

The USS Enterprise was able to destroy Borg drones why didn’t you bring that up

@neolord50pro77

3 жыл бұрын

If it were not ex-drone Picard nothing they could do. Whole USS Enterprise would be assimilated.

@CivilWarWeekByWeek

3 жыл бұрын

@@neolord50pro77 And Binkov didn't even mention it

@Binkov

3 жыл бұрын

Got to save something for the sequel.

@user-lc7jy4jd4y

3 жыл бұрын

I guess you must be Armenian, I understand your pain. I guess lying makes you happy The drones were flying at low altitude to detect the enemy, they were suicide drones, so they could not shoot those drones if they wanted to. S-300 air defense system could not stop Will the USS missile be able to stop it?

@CivilWarWeekByWeek

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-lc7jy4jd4y What does this have to do with start trek

Modernized FLAK artillery could work. A shell explodes in the sky with a lot of shrapnel that rips any drone nearby apart. After all, drones usually arent really armored.

@gameoflife9576

3 жыл бұрын

Could cause a lot of collateral damage with all the shrapnel falling if it's used in an urban environment but it could work.

@missk1697

3 жыл бұрын

@Omar Khurshid thats why i said modernized

@mickeyg7219

3 жыл бұрын

@Omar Khurshid It doesn't have to be that accurate, since it use flaks after all. And modern airburst ammunition can be made really small, Rheinmetall Oerlikon Millennium Gun use 35 mm programmable airburst round, and has a rate of fire up to 1000 rounds per minute, and they found it to be a good candidate for future anti-drone weapon. Most drones, especially quadropter type aren't fast.

@conservativedemocracyenjoyer

3 жыл бұрын

@@mickeyg7219 so wouldn't something like a CIWS be quite effective then?

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

Idiot, FLAK artillery is for low altitude. These drones fly at 25.000 + feet. Even a Stinger missile does not have that reach

I like this, Ive frequently thought about how this is changing warfare and what to make of the entire question. Good stuff

Starlink constellation might make the bandwidth problem a non issue, US military has been interested in it for a whole lot of purposes it seems

@silverhawkscape2677

2 жыл бұрын

So that's what Starlink is for.

@maxklinger1494

2 жыл бұрын

@@silverhawkscape2677 No, but that's (also) why the military is interested. Another use is to use the Starlink satellite bus to build a large missile warning constellation for ballistic missile defense.

If Ace Combat has taught me anything, it's that taking a hit in a non critical area can help you take down drones.

Actually during the Nagorno Karabakh war Azerbaijan destroyed tactical ballistic OTR-21 Tochka, Scud B and even S300 surface-to-air missile systems of Armenia. Azerbaijan used cheap and very old self-flying planes like the Antonov An2 (kukuruznik) to detect the radar systems of S300. Later overwhelmed drone attacks launched and all these Turkish made Bayraktar TB2 drones, Israeli made Elbit Hermes 900, IAI Harop and Azerbaijani made light suicide drones like Zerbe used in collaboration to accomplish the missions.

you are also undermining the unit cost of these drones. Comparable drones are; IAI Eitan unit cost is almost 35 million us dollars. General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper unit cost is 16 million us dollars Bayraktar TB2 unit cost is 5 million us dollars.

@johnr797

3 жыл бұрын

Nothing like seeing military hardware prices to remind me how silly humans are

@darthvader4899

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnr797 Exactly why are they even talking about how fucking F-35 getting expensive lmao. Fucking stupid

As call of duty taught us, use EMP gernades.

@randomthot125

3 жыл бұрын

If you can throw it 10000m up then sure.

@aurathedraak7909

3 жыл бұрын

@@randomthot125 XD, *EMP readdy*

@XimCines

3 жыл бұрын

Just a random nuclear bomb in the upper atmosphere and you can even take out half the country's energy (electricity, internet, water pumps, engines) with it. I just gave you something to think about. Have a good night.

@Archer89201

3 жыл бұрын

Cold blooded is the answer

@serdarkayadelelen609

3 жыл бұрын

@@XimCines Its in only game physics. 1 nuke can only effect like 20 km diameter as a emp thats all

Wish you’ve talked more about Turkish drones.

Love your videos they are funny and smart at the same time and it helps to learn about future technologies

Love these videos. Thank you and keep em comming.

"The enemy cannot push a button, if you disable his hand... Medic!" -Drill Instructor Zim.

binkov: aermenia and azerbaijan are nearly equal *azerbaijan beats the shit out of aermania binkov: ok, lets back drawing board...

@ddx2112

3 жыл бұрын

Binkov analasis was if armenia and azerbaijan went to full war without other support witch means armenia attacking nakchivan but in reality it was just azerbaijan with turkish support against artskah republic, there was no regular army from armenia and there were not attack from armenia

@steppenwolf5956

3 жыл бұрын

@@ddx2112 This is bullshit. Armenian army was fighting in Karabag Turkish army was not there at all

@steppenwolf5956

3 жыл бұрын

Bu the way we consider the army of Azerbaycan 🇦🇿 as a Turkish army

@ddx2112

3 жыл бұрын

@Someone Unknown i just said that there wasnt direct confrontation between armenia and azeris because than armenia would attack nakchivan and btw armenia itself cant be defeated as long as it is member of CSTO and under russiam protection

@ddx2112

3 жыл бұрын

@Someone Unknown exactly, only in karabah region, thats my point, its also interesting how u turks have double standards, u recoginse karabah as part of azerbaijan but u not recgonise kosovo as part of serbia as it is said in UN

brilliant video. thank you for your analysis! you will be very useful in the war sir!

Drones are not necessarily perfect weapons, they just line up so nicely with a tank-heavy Russian juggernaut. Although confirmed drone kills on state of the art anti-air is ironic, and maybe indicates to me a level of disrespect for the danger posed by drones

Two drone videos I've seen stay with me. First is a terror weapon involving a small drone with camera and a single large caliber round. Drone flies up to target for positive ID then BAM! Second is a drone the size of semi. Roof and sides fall off, drone unfolds and lifts off. Did I forget to mention it's full of rocket pods😀? You can deploy it anywhere you have freedom of travel. Also usable on a container ship for ports

@oliverwalters9533

2 жыл бұрын

That second one is fake, I've seen the video you are talking about, it's just a concept artist's idea, not a real weapon

on this video i just got an ad who had binkov on it(WARPATH ad). for a second i tought than binkov changed the subject of the video 🤣

Yes there is counter measures against drones, use reflecting Mico- particle airborne dust. Like a haze of dust spreading over an area.

Drones can never match the effectiveness of manned air or ground forces, however their advantage lies in the fact they are expendable and keeps your own people out of harms way.

@jonathanryan9946

3 жыл бұрын

Plus loitering time

@randomthot125

3 жыл бұрын

I see missiles replacing kamikaze planes though?

@robbiejames1540

3 жыл бұрын

Well, actually AI now beats actual pilots in one-on-one fighter combat in simulations, so I think that soon we'll see squadrons of mostly unmanned fighter pilots, maybe with some real pilots for decision making.

@XimCines

3 жыл бұрын

Never is too much time. You assume technology won't evolve?

@XimCines

3 жыл бұрын

@Matthew FORBES true... Millenial 7 has something to say about ir.

I imagine that one day or already in progress there are Drone Fighters built to engage other drones, maybe small scale versions of actual warplanes. So imagine a future war where 1,000 drones flight in altogether just WWII Bombers, backed by 250 Fighter Drones as Fighters support.

@umutberkorhan9579

2 жыл бұрын

Bayraktar Akıncı drone can shot down other drones but lacks the manuever capability of fighter jets. Not that cool yet, but wait for Bayraktar MIUS unmanned fucking fighter jet

Binkov: Technically that is a very good analysis.

This was a very informative video. Thank You.

Any serious drone can function independently of external comms. Although there are non-RF comms that can be used without giving away position, these are generally just used to communicate with a local swarm or relay, not long range. The US has already demonstrated the basic counter to drones when an F35 was used as a data relay for a Paladin to shoot down a drone. Obviously the Paladin is overkill but any Link16+ enabled system could be used.

To defeat drones gotta use tons of realistic fake targets plus use hit and run tactics with Toyota’s and dshks

I think logistics and training also enter the equation. Logistics from a protected base should be easy and cheap but a single point of failure. Drone operator training is much cheaper vs training for armoured crews. Maintenance of drones is also easier and cheap vs maintenance of armoured forces. Adding the necessary air defence to protect against drones is an added and huge expense to put in the field. Drones are primarily defensive weapons greatly increasing a countries defence. Armour is primarily offensive. Drones make it very expensive to initiate armour offences. Any offensive against a well armed drone advisory will need a good strategy to neutralize the drones first or risk having your armour units destroyed.

i imagine as air power switches over to be mostly drones laser communication would become the norm, near immune to jamming, and sidestepping bandwidth limitations.

I'm sure small drones integrated into small units will happen. Keeping them small and frolific will likely prevent expensive countermeasures being used against them. And I' sure they'd give a massive advantage to any small force. Be it a 24/7 birds eye veiw, or in the case of weaponized drones the ability to directly attack/suppress hard to reach opponents. Not to mention that having a weaponized drone would probably prevent any opponents from feeling safe in any open-air cover

Honestly I consider the Goliath Tracked mine to be the first combat usage of drones

@ArtyomCCCP

2 жыл бұрын

The first usage of drone is the TT-26 a russian variant of T-26 guided with no crews and which had an bomb inside in case it not operational,used during winter war.

"There are two ways of [controlling] drones: satellite or gound-based". Could the drones also be controlled by awacs?

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

Yes. Turkeyś drones can co-operate with other land-air and ground systems. Do you remember when Turkey attacked Assad and shot down 2 SU-24's ? LEt me explain how they got shot down: Turkish AWACS, did detect the Syrian fighter jets, The AWACS than gave information to Turkish F16's and they did shoot out of visual range, guided missiles by the radars of the AWACS

Hi, I liked the video. However, I felt like it lacked structure. Maybe you can work with some kind of TOC and chapter numbers in the future?

A good topic to revisit now

There isn’t going to be a clean war, the entrance of drones into combat won’t be for the better but it would be a game changer of course but hopefully it will never replace manned aircrafts, having your entire combat force as drones won’t look god when the technology gets leaked or its source codes exploited. There should be a mix of both like what we have now. They all have their place in warfare, should that stability change, the threats change too .

They are changing the "morality of war" I will explain: Wars are fought with piloted planes (directly). planes drop bombs, strafe, and fight other planes. Men get hurt, killed, or injured directly. Thus, a direct link to injury is present. Soldiers fight personally. They get killed, injured and maimed. But, it is a personal injury. When you introduce an indirect method of warfare, you introduce "a video game morality". This morality breeds "I am safe from harm and injury. Thus, I am invincible and can not be harmed if my drone is shot down. I simply will "reboot and another drone will take its place.". This is what I call "video game morality". In a piloted plane, the pilot actually feels the pain and potential death. To him, morality of war is direct and painful. This would be like if every soldier were assigned a War bot. The soldier would not feel the pain, injury or death. The War bot would simply be "video game" - "life replaced" with another one and the soldier would not care if that one gets "killed". The soldier could then (after a long hard day on the battlefield) go back to his room, pop a fresh beer, stretch out and play Call of duty. To him the "morality and consequences of war" are nothing more than a video game. An excellent example is the SS and orders: the SS were very much part of the extermination of the Jews, poles, and "enemies of the state" at first, they would put them in a trench and shoot the people. But, this did not last long. The psychological effect directly killing people soon took its toll. SS Soldiers would become PTSD(d) and refuse to shoot anymore. At first, it was a small minority (quick Mil justice - shot dead SS Soldier ) happened. As said extermination continued, far too many refused, "we can not handle the psychological effect of directly killing them anymore and refuse to continue.". The Officers could not shoot an entire Company of SS Soldiers. So, poison gas was created. A group of SS soldiers "escorted" them into "their last and final shower on earth", closed the doors, the gas dropped, and people died. The gas "did the killing" and the SS were absolved of direct murder and or killing. Thus, they could go on living and not be concerned about the indirect method (the gas did the job - they only escorted them into the room and closed the doors). This gas turned out to be extremely efficient. The same is for drones. It is easy to "disassociate one's self from the act and psychological effect of one's actions" if one does not see the direct effect directly or remove the actual feelings attached to the act of killing.

@timebrain3188

2 жыл бұрын

This. I hope that the usage of drones ends up becoming restricted... but I have doubts in that'll happen for a while.

@Sarlacc53

2 жыл бұрын

The drone operator also doesnt pit as mich effort in keeping the drone alive as a pilot, because his life isnt at risk. Also, war could become just smashing toys together until one side runs out.

@timtrewyn453

2 жыл бұрын

Star Trek, original series, "A Taste of Armageddon".

I think it helps to look at loitering munitions as the extension of air-to-ground missiles or guided artillery. Air defenses are meant against aircraft, not individual missiles or artillery. That's the domain of CIWS. I think we'll see the resurgence of ack-ack and CIWS as loitering munitions improve alongside guided artillery rounds, like how we've already seen systems like Pantsir or Phalanx succeed in combat situations, backed by a heavier emphasis on integrated air defense systems and stronger data links between radars and fire control systems.

@MrChickennugget360

2 жыл бұрын

best way to counter is to give IFVs ability to counter loitering munitions.

Drones started as aerial recon then became a weapons platform. Now it's both but it is still easy to shoot them down using lasers, EMP, AAM, SAM and AAA and possibly electronically disrupted by EW systems and particle beams weapons. It could become obsolete very quick. That would leave just satellites and hypersonic aerial vehicles.

Before Turkey: Russia anti air defence systems After Turkey: Russia AINT air defence systems

@blbaggdt

3 жыл бұрын

and yet we (as turkey) bought russian anti air defence systems

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

@@blbaggdt So? we do not know why they are bought. and the S400 is developed to use against long range high altitude targets, not against drones.

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

@@Prizrak-hv6qk That sucks for Russian defence industry. Hey world look: i sell export stuff but like you can see a drone can destroy them. Good marketing :D ha ha ha...why dont you but hurt mother fuckders just accept the fact that Turkey owned Russia ?

The main problem is that most anti drone weapons include missiles which, while effective at too expensive to engage drones

A rocket similar to the Starstreak is under development, but the 3 sub-missiles each receive a proximity fuse. The weapon is laser-guided and does not require radar. Range of over 8000 m .

Active protection system is the key, like Trophy but a more potent one. Each vehicle will have one so they can shoot but could not be shot at.

Micro-drone swarms could be horrendous and demoralizing to ground troops and civilians alike, no doubt they are in production now.

@silverhawkscape2677

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, if they can start looking like Locust swarms then good luck. We can't even beat real swarms with force

@hibiskus828

2 жыл бұрын

Drone swarms are still pretty expensive, and have basically no payload capacity or range, and their guidance/targeting systems are still in early stages of development, and they can be defeated with man-portable EW kit that even civilians can easily access I mean don't get me wrong, drone swarms will definitely perform some useful tasks and even combat tasks on near-future battlefields, but I don't think it's gonna be like that slaughterbots movie either

@wpww3343

2 жыл бұрын

@@hibiskus828 ew kit accessible to civillians? Source?

@Crosshair84

2 жыл бұрын

@@wpww3343 A microwave oven with the door switch disabled, turned on, and pointed at the swarm will fry the $10 of electronics at sufficient range.

@wpww3343

2 жыл бұрын

@@Crosshair84 sounds like an urban legend... got any link?

Bayraktar Akıncı / Turkey

Great video! thanks!

This is without a doubt the best channel on KZread. Also, really want to see a series on the various branches of military intelligence like the NRO, how surveillance sattelites work and what they do, etc

Kurds: Turkey is Kurdistan Armenians: Turkey is Armenia Greece: Turkey is Greece Turkey: *laughs in drone language*

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

You forget the Iranians they claim Persia. And of course the Asyrians. They also claim ownership. I am sure the Romanians and Macedonians would also want to claim it

Title: Are combat drones Me: Ace combat drones

Very interesting..analysis..!

and optical sensors can be jammed too, all modern fighter jets have specific CM to jam missiles, specifically the IR sensors and guidance RF link.

You go underground. Tunnels and hidden bunkers are the way to beat them. You only pop your head up strike then disappear again.

You should do a video on unmanned tanks, like the new Estonian Type-x, what can be motyfied to it's need because it's a total open architecture tank.

Military vehicles simply must return to having machine guns for anti-aircraft role. It may also be a good idea to issue out shotguns, perhaps one per squad, for eliminating small drones. Have the soldiers practice sporting clays and skeet shooting to develop skill at hitting flying targets.

Binkov! Where's your puppet?? Excellent video.

Turkish Drones have entered the chat: Russia left the Chat.

@user-ho8dj2np6v

3 жыл бұрын

Turkey's drone used to defeat a small country armenia doesn't make turkey's drone better. Russians have way more better technology than turkey.

@lagamiyaight7581

3 жыл бұрын

Russian 7200 nuclear rockets entered the chat.

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ho8dj2np6v Thats why Russia 'allowed' Turkey to HUMILIATE the Russian anti air defence systems in Libya, Syria and Karabakh. Russia could have stopped the Turkish drones, but did not do that. Russia allowed Turkey to destroy Russian systems so it can be humiliated in the world, right? ha ha ha :))

@oghuzkhan5117

3 жыл бұрын

@@lagamiyaight7581 Turkey has Nuclear weapons as wel. And you do not need 720000000000 , just 5 is enough ....Incirlik Air base has 90 Nuclear bombs of whom 20 is Turkish property.

@user-ho8dj2np6v

3 жыл бұрын

@@oghuzkhan5117 why would Russians involve in libya and Syria. S300 is designed as anti-aircraft missile not a anti-drone weapon. Of course turkey is still better than many other countries. But if compared to top global powers it's not a big deal.

You don't attack the drone. You attack the dance club where the drone's controllers party.

Great video !! 👍👍👍

Belka, Gründer, what did you make this time and whose flight data did you use?

My information is some turkish drones already have AI. Milsoft technology is still working to improve the AI even more. I am afraid of Skynet from Terminator movies 😅

@verden2323

3 жыл бұрын

Also the AI from Ace Combat Hugin and Munin they are worst they can copy ur movements

What makes drones so dangerous, is the dramatically lowered threshold of force, when the operator incurs no risk.

@BoleDaPole

2 жыл бұрын

Not exactly true, some of these drones are worth more than soldiers.

@JulianSildenLanglo

2 жыл бұрын

On the other hand, when the operator is not at risk he can in theory keep his head cool and double or triple check before shooting since he won't die if the drone is shot down.

best drone amalysis i have ever found

Exelent film!thx

Have they ever tried building the drone chassi out of wood or the like?

@jc.1191

3 жыл бұрын

Hmm. Interesting.

So basically what you are saying is that the spamming tactics from RTS games is now a viable military tactic.

@silverhawkscape2677

2 жыл бұрын

(0_0)

Personally I think we might get armored suits in the future because they'd be a light tank that can walk (or duck) through a door.

thank you