America's Most Ambitious Interceptor with an Insane Past

Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары

In the mid-1950s, the deck of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier came alive as the Douglas F4D Skyray's engines roared. With delta wings inspired by German Luftwaffe designs, the Skyray catapulted off the deck and soared into the sky.
The aircraft's Westinghouse engines didn't disappoint. The Skyray rocketed to 50,000 feet in just 2 minutes and 36 seconds, all while maintaining a pitch angle of 70 degrees. Built for speed and agility, this interceptor was America's Cold War answer to potential aerial threats.
As the Skyray pierced through the clouds, it joined the ranks of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD. It became the only Navy aircraft in a command usually filled with U.S. Air Force and Royal Canadian Air Force planes, solidifying its role as a key player in the defense of North American skies during the Cold War."
---
Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Пікірлер: 213

  • @frankmercer7009
    @frankmercer70093 ай бұрын

    My father was a F-4D Skyray pilot and squadron commander of VF-13 aboard the aircraft carrier USS Shangri-La, out of Mayport, FL. As a kid, I got to sit in the Skyray. I still remember it.

  • @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe

    @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe

    3 ай бұрын

    Amazin.

  • @lostinpa-dadenduro7555

    @lostinpa-dadenduro7555

    3 ай бұрын

    Nice! 👍🇺🇸

  • @Richard-od7yd

    @Richard-od7yd

    3 ай бұрын

    I was stationed in Mayport back during the SKYNARD era . Was it as much a dump back then as it was in the 70s 🤔😉😂

  • @Tiagomottadmello

    @Tiagomottadmello

    3 ай бұрын

    Awesome 👍🏻

  • @elroyfudbucker6806

    @elroyfudbucker6806

    3 ай бұрын

    The USN actually named a ship, Shangri-la? Isn't that Tibetan for paradise?

  • @captainsalty9022
    @captainsalty90223 ай бұрын

    At the age of 11, I watched one crash atMCAS Cherry Point. We were in the family car, stopped at the end of the runway. As the jet lifted off and began to climb. The aircraft began a roll to the right. Just past 90 degrees of roll, the pilot popped out, his chute opening Justin time to slow his descent into rising ground on the side of the runway. The jet continued to roll as it passed over the road ahead of us. Reaching inverted flight, it nosed over and plunged into the slough off the end of the runway, making a big splash. Pretty dramatic stuff to see at 11 years old.

  • @craigkdillon

    @craigkdillon

    3 ай бұрын

    Damn. I bet you talked about that at school for a year. That's exciting at any age.

  • @teamgonzo9289
    @teamgonzo92893 ай бұрын

    My father flew F-9 Panthers, before the Marines got this. Their very first super sonic aircraft. F-4f Skyray. VMF-115;out of El Toro. (Intercepters) My father was the pilot who bent the main frame on this aircraft. Pulling way too hard out of a dive. Showing the brass what it could do. So, yeah. This is the coolest episode ever, to me. Too bad he didn't make it this far. He would have loved this podcast. THANK YOU FOR THIS ONE. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💔 Apache Grunt.

  • @johngalt2506

    @johngalt2506

    3 ай бұрын

    I grew up living in El Toro in the 70s and 80s. Loved it! The Air Show was the high light of the year.

  • @teamgonzo9289

    @teamgonzo9289

    3 ай бұрын

    @@johngalt2506 I was there in the 60s and 70s. Racing home to see speed racer every afternoon. The good old days!!! 👍

  • @johngalt2506

    @johngalt2506

    3 ай бұрын

    @@teamgonzo9289 it was such an amazing place to live back in the day.

  • @teamgonzo9289

    @teamgonzo9289

    3 ай бұрын

    @@johngalt2506 Amen brother 👍

  • @zeus-mt7wx

    @zeus-mt7wx

    3 ай бұрын

    He bent the air frame. 🙏🙏🙏🙏 Would have loved to hear what the top brass & manufacturers had to say about that. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @larryweitzman5163
    @larryweitzman51633 ай бұрын

    I thought this comment was posted, So here it is again. My dad was the leadman in Douglas prototype at El Segunda and built the first F4D Sky Ray and the F5D supersonic SkyLancer which had an area rule (boundary layer/coke bottle) fuselage which was about 8 feet longer but used the same J57 with AB. My dad worked directly with Ed Heinemann on those programs. Only built about 4 F5D.

  • @mothmagic1
    @mothmagic13 ай бұрын

    One of the most beautiful fighters of the era.

  • @AugustusLarch
    @AugustusLarch3 ай бұрын

    This machine, the F4D Skyray, was more of a lightly built sport machine than a naval fighter. Operationally is was not deemed 'squaddy proof' by maintenance chiefs. It acquired many dents and other minor damage just being handled on the deck and in the hanger. But it was a better performer than the Grumman F-11 but slightly harder to handle for inexperienced pilots. It took the F-4 Phantom to replace it fully in the performance envelope. Just a machine way ahead of its time.

  • @SoloRenegade

    @SoloRenegade

    3 ай бұрын

    F11F-1F was far better

  • @lancerevell5979
    @lancerevell59793 ай бұрын

    One of my alltime favorite jet aircraft! Over the last five decades I've built many models of the Skyray. 😎👍 It's a good thing they were able to switch engines, with the debacle of the failed J-40 engine.

  • @richardsawyer5428
    @richardsawyer54283 ай бұрын

    What a handsome aeroplane. I remember seeing a kit in a model shop in Somerset some time back. Keep mining that rich seam of Cold War aircraft, you're finding some gems.

  • @mauricio-wq5lu
    @mauricio-wq5lu3 ай бұрын

    Aircraft designers with bold and innovative ideas.

  • @alanh7495
    @alanh74953 ай бұрын

    A beautiful looking aircraft and held the world speed record for a while, one of my favourite jets

  • @rudolphpyatt4833
    @rudolphpyatt48333 ай бұрын

    The Skyray has always been a favorite of mine. Thanks for posting this.

  • @lancerevell5979
    @lancerevell59793 ай бұрын

    NASA also used the F5D Skylancer, and one pilot was Neil Armstrong. 😊

  • @taproom113

    @taproom113

    Ай бұрын

    Didn't Neil use the Skylancer to work up the flight profile for the experimental Dyna-Soar re-entry vehicle? ^v^

  • @LuciFeric137
    @LuciFeric1373 ай бұрын

    My favorite model as a kid

  • @Horsefingerandthetaintwrights
    @Horsefingerandthetaintwrights3 ай бұрын

    This aircraft appears to be the first area rule blend type of design. Amazingly beautiful.

  • @JSFGuy
    @JSFGuy3 ай бұрын

    This is the one we were waiting for

  • @davidhauton7643
    @davidhauton76433 ай бұрын

    Truly elegant shape and beautiful to watch.....from a time when anything in aviation was possible.

  • @Wobblybob2004
    @Wobblybob20043 ай бұрын

    Good looking aircraft. Looks like it would fit right between an Avro 707 and a Vulcan.

  • @Airsally
    @Airsally3 ай бұрын

    Having built a few RC models of the skyray....they have all flown great.

  • @dlkline27
    @dlkline272 ай бұрын

    I had totally forgotten about this unique aircraft. Many thanks for this great video.

  • @Wideoval73
    @Wideoval733 ай бұрын

    I have always liked this Delta Wing design. A beautiful aircraft!

  • @asyik6
    @asyik63 ай бұрын

    One of beautiful fighter aircraft's design

  • @KDFRxpo2
    @KDFRxpo23 ай бұрын

    Beautiful aircraft.

  • @draconian6692
    @draconian66923 ай бұрын

    Such a beautifl aircraft

  • @harveydenver8348
    @harveydenver83483 ай бұрын

    Good information and excellent vintage visuals.

  • @myperspective5091
    @myperspective50913 ай бұрын

    That was always my 3rd favorite aircraft. The SR71 being my first favorite and the F4 Phantom being my second favorite.

  • @ronaldbyrne3320
    @ronaldbyrne33203 ай бұрын

    Love these Cold War jets. 😍 Another interesting video, thank you.

  • @thudthud5423
    @thudthud54233 ай бұрын

    Beautiful plane. If it had different paint, it almost would look like a modern design.

  • @CorrieBergeron
    @CorrieBergeron3 ай бұрын

    One of the first models I ever built. It still looks futuristic.

  • @alunjones2550
    @alunjones25503 ай бұрын

    One of the prettiest fighters, ever.

  • @dzv8799
    @dzv87993 ай бұрын

    Thank you for Kazimir Semenovich! Really nice!

  • @pauld6967
    @pauld69673 ай бұрын

    This has always been one of my favorite aircraft. Right alongside the F7U Cutlass and F2Y Sea Dart.

  • @jjeung624
    @jjeung6243 ай бұрын

    Had a model of this jet was I was a kid. Good times.

  • @einautofan6685
    @einautofan66853 ай бұрын

    Beautiful Aircraft! Delta Wings and Flying Wings are my favourite Aircrafts!😎👍

  • @corujariousa
    @corujariousa3 ай бұрын

    Nice aircraft. It looks like a mix of the Vulcan and the Phantom.

  • @leonnardsd6865
    @leonnardsd68653 ай бұрын

    Great video. I specially liked the retro music towards the ending, I thought I was watching Agents of UNCLE from Guy Ritchie again...

  • @michaeljerauld9757
    @michaeljerauld97572 ай бұрын

    Great video! I love Dark Skies!

  • @jetvalmonte6574
    @jetvalmonte65743 ай бұрын

    What a gorgeous aircraft, it was a clean design. I’d love to have an RC EDF one day.

  • @jamesjacocks6221

    @jamesjacocks6221

    3 ай бұрын

    I built a Comet, or some other kit, a long time ago and it would hand glide nicely. It’s a stable design.

  • @edutaimentcartoys
    @edutaimentcartoys3 ай бұрын

    nice video 😍and very informative

  • @barrybarlowe5640
    @barrybarlowe56403 ай бұрын

    I like the skyray. I would have liked to see it further experimented with. The F117 nighthawk, vaguely resembles a skyray made from cardboard cut-outs.

  • @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe

    @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe

    3 ай бұрын

    From what aspect?

  • @draconian6692
    @draconian66923 ай бұрын

    Would have been cool if they continued to develop the airframe

  • @stanspeight9638
    @stanspeight96383 ай бұрын

    I Really Love This Plane I Would've Loved To See What It Could've Evolved Into

  • @larryweitzman5163

    @larryweitzman5163

    3 ай бұрын

    It did evolve into the supersonic F5D which was a very similar design with an area rule fuselage that was slightly longer. The F4D later received the J57 which was used in the F5D of which only 4 were built. My dad, a leadman at Douglas Prototype worked with Heinemann in the building the prototype F4D and F5D.

  • @conservativemike3768
    @conservativemike37683 ай бұрын

    Y'know... that's a damn fine looking airplane. I wonder if I can whip one up on my 3D printer...?

  • @viperdriver82
    @viperdriver823 ай бұрын

    Why aren't there any flying examples of this wonderful bird ?

  • @RaymondKarlVeasey75
    @RaymondKarlVeasey753 ай бұрын

    I've Always Liked The Delta-Wing Configuration.

  • @liepalind616
    @liepalind6163 ай бұрын

    It was so beautiful fighter.

  • @whalesong999
    @whalesong9993 ай бұрын

    The F117's control was configured like a delta wing. Can't help but think that the Skyray's design data was incorporated into it.

  • @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe
    @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe3 ай бұрын

    I did not realize th USN had this many Skyrays in their inventory. Good to know.

  • @rproxide977
    @rproxide9773 ай бұрын

    I haven’t gotten past the first ad. I’m excited to watch this about the f4-d and read the comments and learn more

  • @alancranford3398
    @alancranford33983 ай бұрын

    The Ford got its nickname from its F4D type designation (Eff Four D = FORD) much like the Bone getting its nickname from B-1 (B-ONE). I liked this airplane a lot even though it left service before I was able to build scale models.

  • @gilbertpaul6154
    @gilbertpaul61543 ай бұрын

    I would of like a comparison with the Canadian Delta wing Arrow, that was ready to be operational in 1959, skipping the prototype testing, but destroyed by the Canadian government of John Diefenbaker the same year for no good reason, that had no vision. That was an outstanding performance Aircraft.

  • @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe

    @JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe

    3 ай бұрын

    More in common with that huge RAF thing that was canceled as well.

  • @WingedTRex333
    @WingedTRex3333 ай бұрын

    Best jet of the 1950s

  • @truthboomertruthbomber5125
    @truthboomertruthbomber51253 ай бұрын

    Many of the mid 30s film clips shown in this video show tailless designs not deltas. The Me163 was also a tailless design not a delta. The YB35 and YB49 and B1 are some examples of tailless designs. The main drawback to tailless designs are their pitch sensitivity. It’s possible for them to tumble out of control. Edwards AFB is named for a pilot who died from this .

  • @glhx2112
    @glhx21123 ай бұрын

    Fun fact: They shoved a J-79 into at least one Skyray at Edwards. I cant remember what the test was, but. It was discussed in a book titled: The Killer Rays.

  • @christopherflemister8424
    @christopherflemister84243 ай бұрын

    Cool jet aircraft

  • @patrickradcliffe3837
    @patrickradcliffe38373 ай бұрын

    That's a good thumbnail someone took a lot of care building the freeflight model!

  • @billgund4532
    @billgund45323 ай бұрын

    My foggy memory seems to recall an experimental program where a GE J-79 was fitted to the F-4D. True?

  • @unclesmrgol
    @unclesmrgol3 ай бұрын

    It looked far more modern than its peers.

  • @MrShaneSunshine
    @MrShaneSunshine2 ай бұрын

    The balsa and tissue thumbnail is cool!

  • @skydiver1013
    @skydiver10133 ай бұрын

    For the US Navy the McDonnell F3H Demon was the big dog until it was replaced by the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II.

  • @taproom113

    @taproom113

    Ай бұрын

    You're forgetting the Vought F-8 Crusader ... which flew rings around the Demon and the Phantom. The Phantoms kill ratio in Vietnam was 2.5:1 ... The Crusader's KR was 6:1 despite many more Phantoms being deployed in the conflict over a longer period of time. 90% of the first Top Gun instructors were Crusader jocks who were well trained in ACM (the F-8 was designed as an Air Superiority Fighter)... where the Phantom guys were 'missile launching interceptors' first, and ACM guys second. ^v^

  • @davidhayes7596
    @davidhayes75963 ай бұрын

    That's a gorgeous bird.

  • @Wolverines77
    @Wolverines773 ай бұрын

    A very aesthetically designed aircraft. It looks like it was eventually turned into the A-4 Skyhawk (though the A-4 did have two smaller tail wings...

  • @johnchristopherson6970
    @johnchristopherson69703 ай бұрын

    IMHO, one of the most beautiful fighters ever built.Clean and sleak. I wonder why no one has copied this design in a homebuilt microjet.

  • @nathanschaefer5148
    @nathanschaefer51483 ай бұрын

    I'm surprised that there's no mention to it's tendency to porpoise when pulling into a climb or pancaking on landings. The former tended to ripple the skin of the aircraft while the latter made landings more difficult. The later version of it had thinner wings, thicker skin, and an extended nose. It's one of my favorite aircraft, just odd not to hear about some of it's major issues

  • @frostyfrost4094
    @frostyfrost40943 ай бұрын

    Love the English Electric Lighting....did not know it was a delta wing

  • @kingoftadpoles

    @kingoftadpoles

    3 ай бұрын

    Lol I saw that too. 1.11 or thereabouts.

  • @johnjohnon8767
    @johnjohnon87673 ай бұрын

    That's a sharp aircraft, never did build a model jet. But plenty of propeller driven models from ww2.

  • @brealistic3542
    @brealistic35423 ай бұрын

    My father wrote to Lippish about circular wings. Lips was a wonderful man and wrote back about them and also his work. KZread has a series of Lippish tv shows on aerodynamics. Great series.

  • @mitchellkaye9619

    @mitchellkaye9619

    Ай бұрын

    Lippisch was actually a hard core Nazi

  • @GK_Squid
    @GK_Squid3 ай бұрын

    Anyone else glad this thing no longer wong rips super easy on War thunder?

  • @michaelbeloff3505
    @michaelbeloff35053 ай бұрын

    I worked for Westiinghouse (you can be sure if it's Westinghouse), but it was not... It was Pratt&Whitney that powered the ford (F4D)... Better check your facts...

  • 3 ай бұрын

    At the same time Canada built a delta wing interceptor with twin J79 pratt and whitney engines that tested in one of the first flights at mach 1.9 at 50000 feet

  • @beverlychmelik5504
    @beverlychmelik55043 ай бұрын

    One of my favorite Navy birds.

  • @Franky46Boy
    @Franky46Boy3 ай бұрын

    Heinemann, a great but almost forgotten, aircraft designer.

  • @bobharrison7693

    @bobharrison7693

    Ай бұрын

    Forgotten? Hardly!

  • @Franky46Boy

    @Franky46Boy

    Ай бұрын

    @@bobharrison7693 You know him. I know him. And a few thousand other aircraft nerds know him. But he is not as well known as R. Mitchell, Willy Messerschmitt, Jack Northrop and Sidney Camm. And I forgot Kelly Johnson...

  • @andrewowen7705
    @andrewowen77053 ай бұрын

    While I love this channel's videos and content, I'm constatntly surprised at how so many clips don't match the subject, or what's being talked about at that moment.

  • @g.h.9117
    @g.h.91173 ай бұрын

    Not only are our modern aircraft designs taken from the old Luftwaffe hence F86 looks alot like the Mig15 which both came from the Messerschmitt P1101 jet. Also dual axial flow jet turbine engines are also directly sourced from German turbines designed by Dr. Ohain. No body uses the English Frank Whittle centrifugal jet engine anymore.

  • @michaelburke5907

    @michaelburke5907

    3 ай бұрын

    More Nazi fetishism...

  • @Oldbmwr100rs

    @Oldbmwr100rs

    3 ай бұрын

    Centrifugal are still common on smaller utility engines, like GPU's, as well as smaller turboshaft engines, so they're still viable at least. Simple design.

  • @bobharrison7693

    @bobharrison7693

    3 ай бұрын

    The Whittle centrifugal flow design was the right engine at the right time. Little compressor development was required at the time as the centrifugal compressor was already well developed and in wide use in both mechanical and exhaust driven superchargers. On the other hand, axial flow compressors were much more complex, harder to build and still in the early stages of development. Centrifugal units are still in use today in tandem with axial flow compressors in many turboprop engines.

  • @danapicray9040

    @danapicray9040

    3 ай бұрын

    P1101 looks more like a bell and yak 9

  • @RobertL.JonesJr-hz8vl
    @RobertL.JonesJr-hz8vl3 ай бұрын

    Please do something on the Cutlass also?

  • @craigkdillon
    @craigkdillon3 ай бұрын

    Interesting how the current move towards blended body designs look like they are mimicking the thick wing designs of old. That is how the NGAD is supposed to achieve greater range with more fuel, I believe.

  • @Schlipperschlopper
    @Schlipperschlopper2 ай бұрын

    Looks like a mini Avro Vulcan!

  • @tomwheeler9244
    @tomwheeler92443 ай бұрын

    If they let us know they have this...what do they have we don't know about?

  • @auro1986
    @auro19863 ай бұрын

    and here at 1:57 who is inventor? pilot or that who is resting on aircraft?

  • @martineastburn3679
    @martineastburn36793 ай бұрын

    I have a large official photo of a 101 or 102 ? 6682 tail number. R&D version I suspect. The Engine is huge!

  • @miket2120
    @miket21203 ай бұрын

    Heinemann designed the plane to accommodate different engines, in case the projected engines came up short in specs. Engines that didn't meet design power were a major source of failed aircraft during that time. While the F4D could go supersonic, it drank prodigious amounts of fuel because of it's fuselage shape; she was designed before the area rule of fuselage design was developed which greatly reduced drag. The Navy decided not to go with the newer F5D, as it's capabilities nearly matched the F8U Crusader already in service and that there were worries that McDonald Douglas would have the monopoly on naval aircraft.

  • @ThePressurizer
    @ThePressurizer3 ай бұрын

    I think it’s interesting how the Americans used delta wings relatively rarely on their fighters, while European engineers used them all the time. Is cost a reason? European developers probably didn’t have the same resources.

  • @draconian6692

    @draconian6692

    3 ай бұрын

    The us often gets stuck in tradition when it comes to the military

  • @shorthand1121

    @shorthand1121

    3 ай бұрын

    Other than the variable geometry era the F-4 F-15 f-22 and f-35 are each true deltas just with elevators and the F-16 and F-18 are double deltas. I mainly think that the F-14 just looms large in the imagination. I do wish the F-16xl had gone to production though.

  • @ThePressurizer

    @ThePressurizer

    3 ай бұрын

    @@shorthand1121 Ah, thank you. I admit, I don't know nearly enough about wing geometry. But the European jets like Mirage always seemed more, well, triangular.

  • @RobertWilliams-ox4hz

    @RobertWilliams-ox4hz

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@ThePressurizerI think you're thinking of Europeans using deltas with canard. Like the Eurofighter, Rafale, and Gripen.

  • @ThePressurizer

    @ThePressurizer

    3 ай бұрын

    @@RobertWilliams-ox4hz Yes, exactly, that was what I had in mind.

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart41723 ай бұрын

    Theres no doubt. Ed Heinemann knew what he was doing!

  • @44hawk28
    @44hawk283 ай бұрын

    So when McNamara decided to take the f110 and force the Air Force to call it the f4, he was read designating an aircraft who's designation already existed. And would probably have been a better aircraft for Vietnam in the first place. I remember years ago seeing the flight characteristics of this aircraft, and it would probably have eviscerated migs. By the 1960s it would have been engine to be able to go up at faster than it dead in the 1950s. It's agility was probably much superior to the make 17 or the 21.

  • @joseveintegenario-nisu1928
    @joseveintegenario-nisu19283 ай бұрын

    All american Delta aircraft are based in the work by Alexander Lippisch, who, as video points, was in Langley during the NACA tests of his DM-1/ L-13, seized after UK-USA attacks to Germany and other European nations. Just the tailor Roy Scroggs had patented a Delta Wing Planform aircraft before the studies by Alexander Lippisch and CharlesT Jones.

  • @matewansid
    @matewansid2 ай бұрын

    A tail-less delta wing design was never a great idea as a carrier fighter ! But one off the deck it was quite a hot ship !

  • @Tiagomottadmello
    @Tiagomottadmello3 ай бұрын

    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @bassetdad437
    @bassetdad4373 ай бұрын

    The Westinghouse engine was a failure and was replaced with a Pratt and Whitney J-57 jet engine. Several other Navy aircraft were put at risk by Westinghouse and rescued by P&W.

  • @proteusnz99
    @proteusnz993 ай бұрын

    What was secret about the Douglas F4D Skyray? The J-40 (one of Westinghouse‘s rubbish follow ons to the J-34 (the J-46 was the other) that handicapped several US Navy programs (Douglas F4D-1, Douglas A3D, McDonnell F3H-1, Vought F7U Cutlass). However even with the J-40 the prototype F4D took a world speed record. Replacing the J-40 with the reliable J-57 redeemed the F4D (and the A3D), though low speed handling gave some rather alarming looking carrier landings. The lightweight airframe somewhat compromised it’s naval service, the F5D Skylancer was better, but by then it was competing against Vought’s F8U Crusader, McDonnell’s F4H Phantom.

  • @MAGAman-uy7wh
    @MAGAman-uy7wh3 ай бұрын

    If the development had not been delayed, it would have been interesting how this would have competed against the MIG-15. Are there any gaming portrayals of this type of encounter?

  • @jacksavage7808
    @jacksavage78083 ай бұрын

    Never heard of this craft.

  • @hifi6638
    @hifi66383 ай бұрын

    The N.A.C.A. was never called nA’kuh People did not pronounce organization initials as words back then. My father was Chief Aerodynamicist for the agency and I grew up in the core circle of families in leadership of the agency. The people who, when the agency changed its name to N.A.S.A would become the core of the new agency. For which he was also the Chief Aerodynamicist, before reordering the research structure and becoming the director of space vehicle research. Known as N-A-S-A or “the space agency” it would not be pronounced as a word until the very late 1960s. Hearing nA’kuh is like fingernails on a hundred blackboards.

  • @joemalonski5004
    @joemalonski50043 ай бұрын

    What about the tr3 Astra?

  • @jsfbr
    @jsfbr3 ай бұрын

    👏👏👏👏👏

  • @microy
    @microyАй бұрын

    Burgess-Dunne 1910...Delta 1(x2)

  • @user-tm6nq3ou1v
    @user-tm6nq3ou1v3 ай бұрын

    Look's a bit like the F-7U Cutlass as so many other planes of today do as well .

  • @drlong08
    @drlong083 ай бұрын

    @7:08 was surprised that sparks didn't come out on that high angle-of-attack take off....Guess the A-4 was a tail dragger?

  • @craigwall9536

    @craigwall9536

    3 ай бұрын

    Wooden deck.

  • @drlong08

    @drlong08

    3 ай бұрын

    @@craigwall9536 🤦‍♂️

  • @michaellinner7772
    @michaellinner77723 ай бұрын

    This does remind one of the F-16 a little bit.

  • @PhilipFear
    @PhilipFear3 ай бұрын

    Jack Northrop was experimenting with the Delta Wing in the 30's and 40's with his flying wing.... Northrop was just too far ahead of his time is all.... But Northrop got to see his dream become reality when they wheeled him in his wheelchair into a Top Secret hanger to show him the B-2 Spirit shortly before he died.... The proof Jack was right all along.... RIP Jack‼️🇺🇲‼️

  • @draconian6692
    @draconian66923 ай бұрын

    They could have thickened the wing and had a bunch of individual bomb bays. Could have been a great overall small fighter bomber

  • @Idahoguy10157

    @Idahoguy10157

    3 ай бұрын

    See the A-4 Skyhawk

  • @None-zc5vg

    @None-zc5vg

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@Idahoguy10157The Skyray and Skyhawk are essentially the same: the 'A4D' was a Navy designation for what was retitled the 'A4' in 1962.

  • @richarddumont5389
    @richarddumont53893 ай бұрын

    Interesting topic and overall a very good video but 1) should be more focused on the topic 2) video footages do not always match.

  • @None-zc5vg
    @None-zc5vg3 ай бұрын

    Designed as a successor to the Douglas AD 'Skyraider' by the same designer, Ed Heinemann.

  • @bobharrison7693

    @bobharrison7693

    3 ай бұрын

    The A-4 ne A4D was the successor to the A-1 ne AD.

Келесі