The Almost Perfect Aircraft Defeated Only by Time

Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары

As the early morning mist began to lift from the verdant rainforest of Malaya, a trio of de Havilland Hornet DH.103s from No. 45 Squadron RAF vaulted into the tropical skies, their twin Merlin engines roaring in unison as they set off to hunt down their Communist enemy.
While the Hornet had originally been conceived as a high-speed fighter for World War 2’s Pacific Theater, by the early 1950s, it was at the forefront of Britain’s campaign to put down the insurgency that had erupted in their Southeast Asian colony, breaking out from its intended role to prove it was just as adept at ground attacks.
Looking down upon the endless green below as they zoomed over the thick jungle, the DH.103s’ pilots knew they had a difficult task ahead, their target hidden somewhere beneath the dense canopy.
With only their maps to guide them, the three Hornets surged into the marked area before swooping down like the predatory insects for which they were named. One by one, their lethal 1000-pound bombs plummeted through the treetops before shattering the tranquility of the undergrowth below with deafening explosions. Leaving little but a sea of smoke and chaos in their wake, the Hornets disappeared into the horizon, eagerly awaiting their moment to strike again.
---
Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Пікірлер: 266

  • @John..B
    @John..B20 күн бұрын

    the second tail is very well camouflaged

  • @michaeldeering5907

    @michaeldeering5907

    20 күн бұрын

    often referred to as a phantim twin. lol maybe some editting? sheeeeesh

  • @grantmiller6570

    @grantmiller6570

    20 күн бұрын

    The maximum weight of 20,900 feet is also interesting. (5:32)

  • @sidsod1616

    @sidsod1616

    20 күн бұрын

    Early stealth?😊

  • @Mysterybox

    @Mysterybox

    19 күн бұрын

    ​@grantmiller6570 I see you caught that too. Is it just me, or is the quality of these videos declining?

  • @stankygeorge

    @stankygeorge

    19 күн бұрын

    Oh, you didn't notice it either!

  • @whiskey_tango_foxtrot__
    @whiskey_tango_foxtrot__20 күн бұрын

    Its a stealthy twin tail

  • @bootstrapbran6228
    @bootstrapbran622820 күн бұрын

    Threw me with the twin tail part. 😮

  • @GarrettBShaw

    @GarrettBShaw

    20 күн бұрын

    3:00 minute mark for anyone who originally missed it like me 😂

  • @ooloncaluphid

    @ooloncaluphid

    20 күн бұрын

    I don't get how they make videos with such glaringly obvious fundamental errors.

  • @lawerancedodd690

    @lawerancedodd690

    20 күн бұрын

    I noticed that also. I was going to comment but you beat me to it lol

  • @Biffo1262

    @Biffo1262

    20 күн бұрын

    They really blew this one. Embarrassing.

  • @johnsullivan1831

    @johnsullivan1831

    20 күн бұрын

    It’s an AI hallucination.

  • @inglepropnoosegarm7801
    @inglepropnoosegarm780120 күн бұрын

    One Merlin is great, two in such a light and clean aircraft must have been thrilling.

  • @markmogk4814

    @markmogk4814

    20 күн бұрын

    "All in, balls out..."

  • @kiwidiesel

    @kiwidiesel

    18 күн бұрын

    The two Merlin's fitted to the hornet were custom built for that plane.

  • @richardsawyer5428
    @richardsawyer542820 күн бұрын

    Dozens of aircraft? Eric Brown flew hundreds! One of two world records accredited to him. He needs a Dark Skies video to himself.

  • @Tommy-he7dx

    @Tommy-he7dx

    20 күн бұрын

    Totally agree, "Winkle" Browns record of most different types of aircraft flown will never be beaten.....They just don't make enough different craft these days. It blows my mind that even knowing just how mental the Me163 Komet was, he still flew the thing......I could be wrong but i think he was the only allied pilot to do that.

  • @flickingbollocks5542

    @flickingbollocks5542

    20 күн бұрын

    And he is a humble likeable guy.

  • @johnf991

    @johnf991

    19 күн бұрын

    Yep - and his record excludes variants within types, if you see what I mean, so his record is even greater. Others might well have already alluded to the story of the US pilot who tried to beat his deck landings record and had a nervous break-down at the halfway(ish) mark. Brown should have been knighted. A sad loss a few years ago.

  • @johncmitchell4941

    @johncmitchell4941

    19 күн бұрын

    @@johnf991 A Jim Clark of the skies in talent.

  • @rooramblingon895

    @rooramblingon895

    15 күн бұрын

    @@johncmitchell4941 Superb quote. I have to remember than one!

  • @alexguest9937
    @alexguest993720 күн бұрын

    When you think about it, both the Hornet and the Mosquito which preceded it were streets ahead of their time because they were using pre-cursor technology - glued and laminated sheet-wood - to the composite materials used today in modern jets and F1 race-car technology, just to mention a couple of applications. As a cabinet Maker myself, and a Brit, if I'd been alive during WWII it would have been an absolute honour to have been put on the production of a Mosquito or Hornet.

  • @williamjohn4984

    @williamjohn4984

    20 күн бұрын

    I am stunned by the craftsmanship of British wood workers in.. history . I saw a thing about the Titanic engine last night.The low pressure turbine was cast in wooden molds made in house. And imo the mosquito was the best air craft in WW2. The Hurricane was the most important.If Britain lost in 1940.. They Germany might have conquered the Soviets..Bravo Brits our blood brothers.America and the UK is undefeated in war when together

  • @moodogco

    @moodogco

    20 күн бұрын

    ​​@@williamjohn4984 thanks that's nice to hear being the proud brit I am, my grandad was in the raf during the war flying hurricane & was shot down over the south of England losing his arm in the process but unfortunately I never got to meet him as died a year b4 I was born!!! 👍

  • @naradaian

    @naradaian

    20 күн бұрын

    @@williamjohn4984er…afghanistan, Korea, Ukraine and getting their arse handed to them in Gaza where Britain has done 200 flights from Cyprus to help the genocide

  • @IntrospectorGeneral

    @IntrospectorGeneral

    20 күн бұрын

    de Havilland's pre-war D.H.81 Albatross 4-engined passenger transport pioneered those wooden construction techniques. It was a beauty, unfortunately produced in only small numbers before the war. The Russians were the other nation that successfully persisted with wooden composite designs by Lavochkin and Polikarpov using layered veneers with injected phenolic resins, sometimes with a bakelite backing - the techniques are sometimes described as 'Shpon' (which is the Russian word for veneer!).

  • @chipcook5346

    @chipcook5346

    20 күн бұрын

    "Streets ahead." Alright there, Pierce.

  • @mikew2468
    @mikew246820 күн бұрын

    My dad flew Hornets in what was then Malaya during the 'emergency'...I wonder if he's in the footage. He held the record for the astro-nav only race from Singapore to Hong Kong in a piston aircraft flying a Hornet...and, as they were phased out....presumably still does! He said his favourite to fly was the Mosquito though but also that the Gnat was a lovely plane to fly....strange how they're all insects. At a party on holiday in the Caribbean once, my mum was chatting to a woman who said that her husband was a mosquito pilot....my mum said hers was as well....but it turned out the other woman's husband flew the plane that sprayed insecticide on the mangrove swamps...not the DeHavilland. What a life.

  • @jeffreymcdonald8267
    @jeffreymcdonald826720 күн бұрын

    "The Hornet's twin tail design...." Does anybody proof read these scripts before release ??? Enjoyed the vid. Thx.

  • @jtjt210

    @jtjt210

    20 күн бұрын

    They proofed them twice! 🤣

  • @franksizzllemann5628

    @franksizzllemann5628

    20 күн бұрын

    I call them Easter eggs, wouldn't doubt by now they're deliberate, some anyway

  • @jeffreymcdonald8267

    @jeffreymcdonald8267

    20 күн бұрын

    @@franksizzllemann5628 Could be some new fangled AI thing.

  • @plumtube01

    @plumtube01

    5 күн бұрын

    Also, " it had a weight of 29,000ft"

  • @dennisleighton2812
    @dennisleighton281219 күн бұрын

    1:40 Mosquito wasn't actually conceived as a FIGHTER, and only ever got used as one in dire emergencies. Mosquito was primarily a bomber, and sometimes a fighter-bomber, but seldom deployed in pure fighter mode. It was not quite nimble enough to counter German single-engined fighters, but would routinely best just about anything else they came across, til jets arrived! 2:50 " twin-tail design..." Huh? Hornet had a single vertical stabiliser just like the Mosquito. 3:30 By the later years of the war Allied resourcing would have been able to release more aluminium and other rare resources than when Mosquito was being built. Clearly this helped a lot. 5:00 Sea Hornet. Carrier aircraft from the same stable were always slightly more robustly built to withstand the deck landing "mishaps" that often occurred. This is probably what caused the slightly lesser performance, which was still pretty impressive! If Capt Brown says it's the best, then it IS the best! Nobody ever has, or ever will in future, fly more different types of military aircraft as a Test Pilot! His assessments are FACT! Despite not playing an active role in WW II, the Hornet was indeed right at the pinnacle of piston-engined fighters, just as you said. A truly remarkable aircraft from a truly remarkable manufacturer. Salute to De Havilland! Thanks for an entertaining video!

  • @archangelmichael1978
    @archangelmichael197820 күн бұрын

    I love watching these old videos. When you see bombs being dropped, you get to see the blast, but you have to use your imagination for the ground effect. Even if you weren't hit by the blast, the concussive shockwave killed almost everything in the radius.

  • @nicholasbell9017
    @nicholasbell901720 күн бұрын

    De Havilland never made an ugly aircraft. This one was the most beautiful of them all. And a proper pilot's dream, with performance and fire-power, handed propellers, so no swing on takeoff. Good forward vision. I just love the Mossie and the Hornet, sexy little sister!

  • @MrLobstermeat

    @MrLobstermeat

    19 күн бұрын

    I love De Havilland but they definitely made a few Fugly aircraft....Buttt with that said they say beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

  • @KyleCowden

    @KyleCowden

    16 күн бұрын

    I think the Comet was actually sexier. I wasn't a warbird but a racer that, IMHO, secretly served as a test bed for the design that birthed the Mosquito and Hornet come WWII.

  • @robertcaccavalla6469
    @robertcaccavalla646920 күн бұрын

    Wow, I never heard of the Hornets before. Great video

  • @PatousMcGillicuddy

    @PatousMcGillicuddy

    17 күн бұрын

    Neither have I-what the hell? Why was I not informed?!

  • @Bodneyblue
    @Bodneyblue20 күн бұрын

    I was given a photo of a Hornet by my uncle and told it was something to do with his brother in law...But during my research I discovered the brother in law died while a member of a Avro Lancaster shot down by AAA while on a mission attacking V-1 launch sites...So where the Hornet comes in I do not know...The pilot of the Lancaster was a German born Jew who's family had emigrated to Canada. He joined the RCAF. He was also killed. He and the brother-in-law lay side by side in the war cemetery.

  • @hushpuppykl
    @hushpuppykl20 күн бұрын

    29,00 feet in weight???!! 😂 Don't drink when preparing the script!

  • @naradaian

    @naradaian

    20 күн бұрын

    Mallayer was a bit of a shock too never quite sure if its a bot

  • @JayWC3333

    @JayWC3333

    19 күн бұрын

    I guess this another video voiced by a bot.

  • @johnsonrj74

    @johnsonrj74

    17 күн бұрын

    ​@@JayWC3333I've thought that for a while

  • @July41776DedicatedtoTheProposi

    @July41776DedicatedtoTheProposi

    17 күн бұрын

    Scientific illiteracy runs amok!

  • @scotttait2197

    @scotttait2197

    15 күн бұрын

    It's not a bot ...as last two letters would indicate its an idiOT

  • @chipcook5346
    @chipcook534620 күн бұрын

    Thank you, team, for the wonderful summary. And thanks for managing the footage I have never seen before. Although I wondered what happened to this plane, I never looked. I guess I always thought it was one of those marks that the combination of tech timing and national needs passed by. Good to know that it was of practical value. Such a pretty plane.

  • @WorkerDroid
    @WorkerDroid20 күн бұрын

    Thanks for all these videos. Always something interesting.

  • @sheldonaubut
    @sheldonaubut20 күн бұрын

    "Had a maximum weight of 20,900 feet." "Twin tail." Oh my, these little errors sure do feed the KZread algorithm by generating comments. At least now they actually take the time to find video of the actual subject aircraft. I've always viewed the Hornet as an evolution of the de Havilland DH 88 Comet of the 1930s, which I consider to be the most attractive aircraft of all time.

  • @michaelhannah5376
    @michaelhannah537618 күн бұрын

    The Hornet is the prime example of “ if it looks right, it will fly right” Eric “ Winkle” Beowns favourite aircraft. High praise indeed.

  • @philliprobinson7724
    @philliprobinson772417 күн бұрын

    Hi. Not only a twin-tail hornet (3:00-3:10), but it has a maximum weight of22,000 feet. (5:33). An amazing aircraft. Cheers, P.R.

  • @tysonator5433
    @tysonator543317 күн бұрын

    I would love to see a hornet fly at an airshow. This amazing aircraft should not fade away in history, however live on at airshows !

  • @sundancer014
    @sundancer01414 күн бұрын

    Well,that one flew under the radar.I've never heard of it,but will certainly share this with others.Cheers.

  • @shawncarter5619
    @shawncarter561920 күн бұрын

    I have been waiting for a video on this aircraft!!! The de Havilland Hornet is my all time favorite aircraft.

  • @electrogrim
    @electrogrim18 күн бұрын

    Dark Skies posts would be a lot better if archive video was aspect ratio corrected.

  • @michaelpipkin9942
    @michaelpipkin994216 күн бұрын

    6:45 This is a description of a plane that a pilot has got a hold of and appreciates it's tight build.

  • @randallleonard1249
    @randallleonard124919 күн бұрын

    What a beautiful airplane!

  • @drmarkintexas-400
    @drmarkintexas-40020 күн бұрын

    🎖️💪🤗🙏 Thank you for sharing this

  • @benjaminrush4443
    @benjaminrush444319 күн бұрын

    Great Video. There were a few late WW II and Post War piston aircraft from the USA that were quite good, but I don't know if they could "Out-perform" the Hornet. Thank you.

  • @ravenclaw8975
    @ravenclaw897519 күн бұрын

    I really enjoyed this video young man. Could you do one, if you haven't already, on the American "Moonbat?" Thx.

  • @Mysterybox
    @Mysterybox20 күн бұрын

    Some of the obvious errors here (and in other videos) are making wonder if the narrator is a digital voice. Just what the hell is "a maximum WEIGHT of 20'900 FEET"? A human would have caught that one.

  • @JayWC3333

    @JayWC3333

    19 күн бұрын

    Yeah...AI voice. I'm disappointed.

  • @JayWC3333

    @JayWC3333

    19 күн бұрын

    Yeah... I'm disappointed.

  • @Gixer750pilot
    @Gixer750pilot20 күн бұрын

    The mozzy is the most beautiful plane ever made . Sorry hornet , sorry spitfire

  • @chipcook5346

    @chipcook5346

    20 күн бұрын

    Certainly the Mosquito is my favorite of the period, but that Hornet is just dandy. I can't help but think of one when I think of the other.

  • @harrywagner3877

    @harrywagner3877

    19 күн бұрын

    For some reason the vertical stab bothers me.....

  • @deane2974
    @deane297420 күн бұрын

    I normally enjoy the accuracy and information regarding these videos but I have some complaints on this one. They compare the Hornet to the FW 190 and Zero. Both were developed much earlier than the Hornet. If you want a fair comparison then look at the TA 152 variant of the FW 190 or the Do 335 Arrow. Then you will be comparing apples to apples!

  • @Biffo1262

    @Biffo1262

    20 күн бұрын

    Not me it's twin tail and weight measured in feet. 🤣

  • @MrT67

    @MrT67

    14 күн бұрын

    And its flip flaps 😂

  • @paulbantick8266

    @paulbantick8266

    13 күн бұрын

    and both the Ta 152 and Do335 were crap. The Ta 152 never flew a sortie at high altitudesand its in-service performance was less trhat than that attained in development. It also had a crap engine history. As for the Do.335. It was nothing but a flying brick. Again, with no evidence that it could fly at it's development speeds and it too was prone to catching fire.

  • @billrossignon8621
    @billrossignon86216 күн бұрын

    A Hornet vs a ME 262 would have been an interesting dogfight.

  • @Mr.SharkTooth-zc8rm
    @Mr.SharkTooth-zc8rm3 күн бұрын

    What a beauty!

  • @galaxysurfer1122
    @galaxysurfer112220 күн бұрын

    Wow! Literally never seen or heard of this a/c before, even though my fave WWII a/C was it's predecessor, the Mosquito. I think I now prefer it to the Mossie looking at this video. Thanks!

  • @pibbles-a-plenty1105
    @pibbles-a-plenty110520 күн бұрын

    Neither the Mosquito nor the Hornet had "twin tails." Weight is not measured in "feet." That was not a Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star pictured. The P-80 saw very little action in Italy during WW2. You have lots of good historical information in them but try to proof your videos better to get rid of the boob-boos.

  • @petertyson4022
    @petertyson402220 күн бұрын

    Never heard of the hornet. Learnt something new. 👽👍

  • @mickvonbornemann3824
    @mickvonbornemann382416 күн бұрын

    Imagine if the Westland Whirlwind had reached RAF squadrons with RR Merlins instead of RR Peregrines in 1940.

  • @DaiElsan
    @DaiElsan20 күн бұрын

    The American Shooting Star was in fact the British Jet prototype.

  • @jonathansteadman7935

    @jonathansteadman7935

    20 күн бұрын

    No, it was a Gloster E.28/39 in 1941, way before the shooting star.

  • @DaiElsan

    @DaiElsan

    20 күн бұрын

    @jonathansteadman7935 that's exactly what I said. I just couldn't remember what the E number was.

  • @user-uc2ox7fl6x

    @user-uc2ox7fl6x

    20 күн бұрын

    "Да наоборот же!"

  • @DaiElsan

    @DaiElsan

    20 күн бұрын

    ​@@user-uc2ox7fl6xХоу ничего не знает

  • @princea.khamar5037
    @princea.khamar503720 күн бұрын

    What a wonderful video !!!

  • @davidstrother496
    @davidstrother49620 күн бұрын

    Where is this twin tail configuration you claim added so much to its handling? I never saw it on any Hornet.

  • @whiplash8277
    @whiplash827720 күн бұрын

    Sharp aircraft, outstanding performance. What's not to like?

  • @seanbigay1042
    @seanbigay104220 күн бұрын

    Holy Blackhawks, Batman! That is one pretty airplane. Now if only it was painted green ...

  • @DeFilmKater
    @DeFilmKater18 күн бұрын

    What a beautiful plane! 😃👍

  • @LessAiredvanU
    @LessAiredvanU20 күн бұрын

    I don't suppose anyone would consider building one now, with a carbon fibre frame and skinned with a graphene composite - and turbo prop engines...?

  • @nicholasbell9017

    @nicholasbell9017

    20 күн бұрын

    Go on then. Get on with it!

  • @robertpatrick3350
    @robertpatrick335020 күн бұрын

    The early jets did not have superior handling……. Early jet pilots had to use their speed advantage and not get into a turning engagement with the late/postwar prop planes as Mig15 pilots found to their peril in the Korean War

  • @williamsmith7340
    @williamsmith734016 күн бұрын

    With that twin tail slip, it almost sounds like a P-38 snuck into the Mosquito’s woodpile…

  • @cyrillawless
    @cyrillawless16 күн бұрын

    It’s a shame jet aircraft didn’t come twenty years later. The best piston aircraft at the end of the war really didn’t have time to shine.

  • @deanseher2594
    @deanseher259418 күн бұрын

    Aside from the invisible twin tail, since when are weights reported in feet? Who edits these?

  • @FiveLiver
    @FiveLiver17 күн бұрын

    Winkie Brown was the first man to land a jet on an aircraft carrier.

  • @TheFunkhouser
    @TheFunkhouser19 күн бұрын

    Imagine if the RAF had this and the epic Tempest II in their fleet in early 1944! Wow 😮😮❤❤

  • @kiwidiesel

    @kiwidiesel

    18 күн бұрын

    That would be quite the formidable pairing of two very potent birds of prey.

  • @mickvonbornemann3824
    @mickvonbornemann382416 күн бұрын

    Anyone notice the thrust inducing exhaust systems, designed to increase complimentary thrust?

  • @nigel900
    @nigel90020 күн бұрын

    Beautiful airplane. 🫡🇬🇧👍🏻

  • @joshmccoy1522
    @joshmccoy152218 күн бұрын

    It's a shame they weren't able to ship a couple of samples to Davis-Monthan AFB for preservation, but of course nobody was thinking of that at the time.

  • @Idahoguy10157
    @Idahoguy1015720 күн бұрын

    Test pilot Capt Eric “Winkle” Brown RN flew up to a thousand different aircraft types

  • @geebee8547
    @geebee854713 күн бұрын

    I think the horsepower rating was total HP rather than per Merlin. I can't recall any Merlin that exceeded 2000 HP. That's why Rolls Royce developed the Griffon engine.

  • @garybrown4449
    @garybrown444915 күн бұрын

    Bear cat was fast but late . And could still out range my British air craft . But then again 86 and 15 very thirty.

  • @RemusKingOfRome
    @RemusKingOfRome20 күн бұрын

    Goering's ultimate heavy fighter finally revealed.

  • @_od_7825
    @_od_782518 күн бұрын

    Please, stop thing like 45th squadron. It’s 45 Squadron. American squadrons may well have st or th after the number but RAF and FAA squadrons do not.

  • @tvgerbil1984
    @tvgerbil198420 күн бұрын

    Long services in the hot humid tropical climate of Malaya had to be very detrimental to the Hornet airframes.

  • @lawrieflowers8314
    @lawrieflowers831418 күн бұрын

    A true hot-rod version of the peerless Mosquito...

  • @peterback7789
    @peterback778914 күн бұрын

    At 2:57 we are told it has a twin tail design - I wonder why it was that they didn't implement the design ?

  • @williamkirkham7357
    @williamkirkham735717 күн бұрын

    At 3:00 the narrator says the Hornet had a twin-tail design, compared with the Mosquito's single stabilizer. But this is obviously wrong. You can see in the footage that the Hornet only has a single tail, not two.

  • @jasonhesson1030
    @jasonhesson103020 күн бұрын

    Would've loved to have seen an earlier development (possibly alongside the Mossie) as an escort fighter in Europe! Could've helped out the 8th AF before the Mustangs even got deployed!

  • @kenharris5390
    @kenharris539020 күн бұрын

    Alas, the Mosquitos built under licences for the Royal Australian Air Force suffered some pilot and navigator fatalities. The glue used to attach part of the aircraft fuselage could not stand the heat and humidity of Australian operations. After several planes disintegrated in mid-air, the problem was finally discovered. One problem that cost lives was the lack of a jettisonable cockpit canopy. Apart from these problems, planes were one of the distinguished war-winning weapons.

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    17 күн бұрын

    No. Nothing to do with the glue used! It was poor construction practise among Aussie sub-contractors who didn't follow the long-established instructions for bonding joints. Humidity & heat didn't help, but correctly built Mossies did not fall apart in mid air in any climate.

  • @peterk3227
    @peterk32274 күн бұрын

    It is a fine plane , however I would prefer a single engine fighter , as it would snap-role faster in a dog fight . It was the same with the 262 , a great plane but still had the same problem . An engine on each wing . It would depend on the mission requirements .

  • @ARCHAEVS
    @ARCHAEVS20 күн бұрын

    I still prefer the Mosquito, the Mosquito looks better and is more versatile. Also man the Hornet has an excellent cloaking device hiding its second tail.

  • @shinjiikari1021
    @shinjiikari102120 күн бұрын

    I knew it, so thumbnail and knew it was hornet!!!

  • @Biffo1262

    @Biffo1262

    20 күн бұрын

    The twin tail gives it away. 😂

  • @shinjiikari1021

    @shinjiikari1021

    19 күн бұрын

    @@Biffo1262 i play too much Azur Lane, where the Sea Hornet variant is the strongest fighter ingame. although i play the game because i like the historical ships first, waifus second.

  • @normanfawley7379
    @normanfawley737920 күн бұрын

    That voice !

  • @keithdurose7057
    @keithdurose705718 күн бұрын

    The Hornet is what the Whirlwind should have been.

  • @robertpatrick3350
    @robertpatrick335020 күн бұрын

    They did well in defeating the Communists in Malaya along with the Centaurus powered Tempests

  • @DIREWOLFx75
    @DIREWOLFx7516 күн бұрын

    What twin tail design? The Hornet tail was enlarged from the Mosquito, but it was exactly the same kind of design. The Vampire, Sea Vixen and Venom as well as Albatross and Flamingo DID have twin tails, but they have absolutely no connection with the Hornet.

  • @SPak-rt2gb
    @SPak-rt2gb19 күн бұрын

    Brits sure liked those engines out in front of the canopy

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    17 күн бұрын

    It's because the "Brits" used an inline engine quite often & they tend to be slim, but long.

  • @stevec6232
    @stevec623220 күн бұрын

    Looks like a mosquito to me...

  • @lancerevell5979

    @lancerevell5979

    20 күн бұрын

    Developed from the Mossie, but sleeker.

  • @robwernet9609

    @robwernet9609

    20 күн бұрын

    I mean, it's just an improved version of the wooden wonder.

  • @zh84

    @zh84

    20 күн бұрын

    There's a good Wikipedia article on this aircraft which explains their relationship.

  • @mavericmorph5358

    @mavericmorph5358

    20 күн бұрын

    Smaller.

  • @paulm749

    @paulm749

    20 күн бұрын

    ...a Mosquito that hit the gym HARD and got fitted with a trim new suit.

  • @fredericklee4821
    @fredericklee482120 күн бұрын

    Did the tropics (Malaya) and wood surface wings and fuselage produce a deterioration issue for the Hornet?

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    17 күн бұрын

    No.

  • @waltermeeks5357
    @waltermeeks535717 күн бұрын

    This is a good series. If the script was proofed by someone who knew a little basic history or would bother to fact check, it would be a great series. All that said, imagine a Hornet with a pair of PT6 turboprops. I suspect it would be relevant today as a COIN aircraft. Plus, it would be a blast to fly. \

  • @korale174
    @korale17418 күн бұрын

    Thats a weird P80 shooting star.

  • @TadMarko
    @TadMarko13 күн бұрын

    4:3 video looks better letterboxed than stretched.

  • @rhb4455
    @rhb445517 күн бұрын

    Better comparison w/P-38 than 51... But why bring the 38 down to the 103's level, right?!

  • @user-il2nq2nx4u

    @user-il2nq2nx4u

    17 күн бұрын

    F7F would be a better comparison.

  • @MrFlazz99
    @MrFlazz9911 күн бұрын

    I may be mistaken, but was there not a problem with the Mosquito (and presumably also the Hornet) in the Far East, due to the warm humid climate causing the glued wooden structure to fall apart?

  • @dhroman4564
    @dhroman456420 күн бұрын

    Wow a max weight measured in ft?

  • @manricobianchini5276
    @manricobianchini527613 күн бұрын

    The Vought F4u Corsair was still the best fighter of WW2. Twin-tailed?

  • @Porculus
    @Porculus20 күн бұрын

    Twin tail? Erm... nope! How does an error like this happen? You guys really need to proofread the script before publishing.

  • @paulm749

    @paulm749

    20 күн бұрын

    How the heck are they gonna crank out all this "content" if they have to proofread the stuff??? Priorities man, priorities! LOL

  • @loiclaronche5675
    @loiclaronche567520 күн бұрын

    When the Mosquito was envisionned and built, it already was with speed and altitude in mind (PR Mk.I). As for the twin tail, ..... no comment

  • @islandmonusvi
    @islandmonusvi16 күн бұрын

    Winners are Always eager to invest in fighting the last war…

  • @Jagger-uk8ff
    @Jagger-uk8ff19 күн бұрын

    Both the Hornet and the mosquito only had one tail

  • @Titus-as-the-Roman
    @Titus-as-the-Roman20 күн бұрын

    Semi-Quoting Jay Leno, "The Last Use of Older Technology is Always Better than the Use of New Technology", one reason change is sometimes too hard. America had this same problem, the Outstanding designs of later Piston Aircraft came too late and was washed by the new Jets.

  • @Titus-as-the-Roman

    @Titus-as-the-Roman

    20 күн бұрын

    Example; Grumman's F7F Tigercat, Grumman's answer to the Hornet.

  • @TheFunkhouser
    @TheFunkhouser19 күн бұрын

    Sad there's none in good condition left 😢😢

  • @davetheglidingbum
    @davetheglidingbum17 күн бұрын

    With only maps to guide them! god save us!

  • @sufianansari4923
    @sufianansari492317 күн бұрын

    3:02 what twin tail?

  • @BrianJones761-wc4hu
    @BrianJones761-wc4hu15 күн бұрын

    Did the wings delaminate and fall off in the tropics like the Mosquito or did they get that sorted.

  • @MrT67

    @MrT67

    14 күн бұрын

    I've read that they sorted the delamination issue, even for the Mosquito.

  • @tomg6284
    @tomg628419 күн бұрын

    Hint, pre-read what is written. Folks who like aviation or are pilots are very detail oriented. We all make mistakes.

  • @quirkessence9446
    @quirkessence944618 күн бұрын

    I see three tails, why he's saying it has only two?

  • @davidforbes7772

    @davidforbes7772

    16 күн бұрын

    One less scotch for you tonight, my good man.

  • @nathanahubbard1975
    @nathanahubbard197520 күн бұрын

    Yeah, it would be impressive for WW2, but just like the Bearcat, it was a little too late to matter.

  • @jazzandbluesculturalherita2547
    @jazzandbluesculturalherita25474 күн бұрын

    WHERE IS THAT TWIN FOR THE TAIL?

  • @alexandermartincausey7333
    @alexandermartincausey733320 күн бұрын

    5:28 - 5:30 a maximum weight of 20,900 feet?

  • @erintyres3609
    @erintyres360917 күн бұрын

    3:00 "twin tail design" ???

  • @greymann
    @greymann16 күн бұрын

    It ain't no lockheed P-38 but was faster if not as heavy duty as the 38.

  • @vaughnmojado8637
    @vaughnmojado863720 күн бұрын

    It is a goofy looking noseless plane. But damn was it fast and maneuverable. The English had some great equipment,

  • @leximatic
    @leximatic18 күн бұрын

    The best piston fighter was the Do 335. Twin engins, faster, harder to target and ejection seat.

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    17 күн бұрын

    The ejection seat does not make it a better fighter - it was an absolute necessity because of the rear propeller. It was not a good fighter - a complete lack of a rear view & the wide turning circle meant it was suited only to 'hit & run' using its high speed in a straight line. Up at the altitudes where the bombers flew it was not that impressive, climb rate was average/poor, the P-47M & N were more powerful at 30,000 ft & was 2.5 tons lighter & it was faster i.e. up at altitude it would be just a meal for the new Thunderbolts. The Do 335 was just another way for the Nazis to waste their resources of materials & workers. Oh & even on final production models the rear engine overheated [obviously] & it was a bugger to land except on perfect runways due to the weight & extraordinarily long landing gear - a man could stand under the front engine & the rear engine. Absurd.

  • @leximatic

    @leximatic

    17 күн бұрын

    @@nightjarflying Teething problems.

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    17 күн бұрын

    @@leximaticBaloney - so your beloved Do 335 version was some fictional version that never flew! The "problems" are part of the design & were never 'teethed out': climb rate, turning circle, overheating, long legs, poor view, high fuel consumption - these were all bugs in the production models. This is why it was eventually turned over to conversion to a night fighter. It was also under-gunned compared to other fast fighters & thus not much use against daylight US bombers. i.e. the extra speed was essential for getting to the bombers, but without airbrakes it couldn't accurately engage a target in the short time available to it & if it was throttled back for accuracy it became Mustang meat. Pilot had very little situational awareness in Mustang-infested skies. A concept dead on arrival that couldn't get replacement engines & overused precious fuel.

  • @leximatic

    @leximatic

    17 күн бұрын

    @@nightjarflying Claude Dornier was a genius.

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    17 күн бұрын

    @@leximatictherefore his a/c must be wonderful. Right? LOL get out of town - you have no actual knowledge.

  • @mrjockt
    @mrjockt20 күн бұрын

    “Twin tail design”?

Келесі