When you can casually test your new weapon just over the borders.

@EtoumanGuillaume-qp6rz

Ай бұрын

They learn from America last 70 yrs of war abroad. Thanks Uncle Sam

@Djkommode

23 күн бұрын

@@EtoumanGuillaume-qp6rzI mean our war tactics are online and they can’t defend against us still.

@joostesselink2780

23 күн бұрын

You misspeld as far away from nato awacs planes as possible

The wingman concept is just amazing.

@professorg8383

10 ай бұрын

Yeah because operating one advanced aircraft, is just too easy!! if they build a dozen of these that will give them about two for each serviceable SU-57!! Sorry, but I just can't imagine this being a remotely logical tactic. Russia has already proved that their "advanced technology" is 2 decades behind the West. None of hs fancy stuff works with out western supplied electronics. They are robbing processors out of imported refrigerators and microwaves, to put in weapons! Russia only has one real electronics supplier and it's a state run company that isn't very good. They do have a few small high tech private businesses, but they can't make anything without western supplied electronics. More Russian make believe hype!

@doofyler

10 ай бұрын

It's just cgi

@davidburke5782

10 ай бұрын

Moskva

@_Coffee4Closers

10 ай бұрын

It's almost like you think they came up with the idea or have that capability or something. 🤣

@professorg8383

10 ай бұрын

@@_Coffee4Closers They didn't and they don't!! Although the "wingman" idea probably is Russian. And if you play out that idea in a practical sense, it's really a dumb idea. The Russian military designers are dreamers, putting concepts that look good on paper, but that they are incapable of producing. Think Su-57, T14 Armata tanks and of course the "unstoppable" hypersonic missiles that have proved to be easy pickings for Patriots! They probably executed some engineers over that failure to deliver!

OMG ... so many "military experts" here that live in Star Trek and think stelth automaticly means it have Romulan cloacking device or something ...........

@HideeyeeL

10 ай бұрын

So it doesn't 😧

@FerNando-ys5hc

10 ай бұрын

They're been fooling around but still you know how kids are lol

@zulfanirich7594

10 ай бұрын

cloak engaged

@avengerpz

10 ай бұрын

@@zulfanirich7594 "warp core breach is immenent"

@neolord50pro77

10 ай бұрын

⁠@@zulfanirich7594”Red alert! Load the torpedo bays, ready phasers!”

One thing is for sure . This conflict has not been good for the mercenaries fighting for Ukraine... they just not accustomed of being shot back at.

@Stephen-bq4nq

10 ай бұрын

Yeah Wagner has certainly had a tough time 😂

@tedrow70

10 ай бұрын

You mean the Russian mercenaries 😂 ex western vets are not running from them

@Titoscudd

10 ай бұрын

​@Stephen-bq4nq they cleaned Ukraine's and NATO's clocks! Took Bakhmut in spite of the massive investment of resources and manpower to secure and defend it

@Stephen-bq4nq

10 ай бұрын

@@Titoscudd it took months and tens of thousands of dead to take a small city and that was with superiority in artillery and airpower. And after all that they can't even advance past it because their flanks aren't secure. The icing on the cake is the boss of Wagner had a meltdown after seeing all his casualties and turned on Putin and now Wagner isn't even in Ukraine. Keep coping🤡

@pogo1140

10 ай бұрын

@@Titoscudd in about 5 months and another 5 months before that. Meanwhile, the Ukrainians are moving around the city to surround it.

The Russian have always been good at building beautiful formidable fighter jets

@rharris4736

10 ай бұрын

Their "beautiful, formidable fighter jets" have been getting shot down by spare parts and scraps for the entire length of the war.

@Republic3D

10 ай бұрын

@@rharris4736 Let me guess, Ghost of Kiev was real 🤣

@rharris4736

10 ай бұрын

@@Republic3D 128 terrabytes of video footage and around 3.2 million eyewitnesses confirm that the answer is yes. And while we're at it, the Earth is round and dinosaurs were real. It's called science, child. Borrow a book from someone who actually made it out of the fifth grade, and look it up.

@yastyman

10 ай бұрын

@@rharris4736 so you found out that planes are shot down in combat? Awesome, looks like you actually read the book.

@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab

10 ай бұрын

Nothing very stealthy about that jet nozzle...

Onother state of the art Shovel. Ukraine should prepare for a peaceful end to this conflict.

@IKnowWhereYouSleep--3

3 ай бұрын

looks like the first 6th. Generation shovel!

@bobbybeeman7280

2 ай бұрын

Ukraine has no say so over this mater. US Pres Biden and the Super rich who run this world are controlling it. There are to many USA hidden Bio chemical plants and Pharma plants involved to let it go. The owners of these plants make billions off of their products so will fight to the bitter end. They use there bio chem plants to feed people unknowingly food and medical additives to get people hooked on their drugs and have many tools for their trade like the World Health Organization being the chief tool of distributors.

@stanleylexxtweedle3555

Ай бұрын

Do you have authority or knowledge to tell what Ukraine should do? Did you noticed Kremlin regime openly declared elimination of Ukrainian identity as a goal?

@LordWyrda

Ай бұрын

@@stanleylexxtweedle3555 Every day of war that the Ukrainian Nazis refuse peace will cost more territory. The Russians will win no matter what. It's all about how many people mass murderer Zelensky sends to die and how much he wants to destroy his country.

@RochefortTrappist

Ай бұрын

All 2 of them are very scary!!

"The delicate balance of the conflict" is essential to keep this long-term money laundering operation going…

@paulskopic5844

10 ай бұрын

BINGO

@saeedmustapha1334

10 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍

@oriontukal

10 ай бұрын

​​@@The_Funguseatero such thing as freedom..... ur government shows that 😢😢😢😢😢😂😂😂😂😂 plus karma

@robertmontgomery3892

10 ай бұрын

Amen. You nailed it.

@roberthaines4221

10 ай бұрын

You're referring to _Russia,_ of course...

Русские настолько брутальны, что подбивают Брэдли и Леопард ради микросхем для своих стиральных машин.

@zigbeegooblesnort125

10 ай бұрын

Yep the Soviets are Klingons.

@maksimluzin1121

10 ай бұрын

@@toliklisiy5868 , Klingons is a Civilization of cyborgs from one old computer game...

@maksimluzin1121

10 ай бұрын

@@toliklisiy5868 , I'm 50+ as well, I don't play computer games for 20+ years, as I can remember it, but _that_ game I remember very well, it's _very_ old, the first release, if I'm right, was on the black&white variant of monitors (even without graphics, but with pseudo-graphics)...

@beastlegion2965

10 ай бұрын

Katsapu kykarekayut I sobirayut rakom kliukvy v kokoshnik v kotorui ya vchera nasral

@beastlegion2965

10 ай бұрын

@@toliklisiy5868 skolko vchera kliukvy nasobiral? Any priznavaicya laptenogii katsapelo. Skazhu po bratski a...

Combat proven even before mass production wtf lol

@PeterLamin-bw5rs

10 ай бұрын

😂 F 35 the flying submarine with Chinese brakes 😁😁😁

@muhammadridwan-yb3vq

10 ай бұрын

@PeterLamin-bw5rs And Chinese magnet too 😂

@andrew_koala2974

10 ай бұрын

It was done on WEDNESDAY - THURSDAY - FRIDAY You have to understand that there exist TEST simulators

@miked9260

10 ай бұрын

Going through speed track 😊😊😊😊😊

@laughingbuddha1926

10 ай бұрын

It was already tested … don’t you heard that on June month this same drone damaged Ukrainian ammunition facility centre.. plz check your ears from doctor 😂😂I think there is some issue 😅😅😅

The SU-57 drawback so far has been the round thrust vectoring engine nozzles, which make the aircraft easier to detect. But they've now developed square thrust vectoring engine nozzles and begun installing them on the aircraft which should significantly increase the stealth capabilities. As you can see in this video, the S-70 also currently has a round nozzle, while the schematics of the same drone feature a stealthy nozzle. It might be that the same design as on the SU-57 will be implemented on the S-70 as well.

@tarkgundogdu8940

10 ай бұрын

I think they should do it in elliptical shape to suit the shape of the air plane.

@lukewhitehouse4103

10 ай бұрын

And the new Su-57 gen 2 has completely smoothed surfaces and a RAM coating reducing RCS and reducing detection distance head on.

@teicangigi559

10 ай бұрын

Duzele rotunde într-adevar sunt dezavantajoase, dar vectorizarea în conncepția rusească pleacă de la ideea twin engines. În fapt este vorba despre o vectorizare independentă pentru fiecare motor. Astfel, fiecare motor are o vectorizare independentă, fiecare motor poate direcționa jetul în mod circular la un unghi de 15 grade fața de linia orizontalei. În asemenea condiții, avionul are o semnătură termică mai mare, dar compensează cu o excepțională manevrabilitate, care depășește anvelopa alpha de zbor (cea sigură pentru pilot), fără să intervină sistemul fly by wire ca la aparatele occidentale.

@davidburke5782

10 ай бұрын

​@@lukewhitehouse4103- Do they have more than ten ???

@lukewhitehouse4103

10 ай бұрын

@@davidburke5782 I don't know the exact production number, but I would say do they need them? They are not in a war with the West (yet) and against Ukraine their Gen 4 Flankers are more than enough. Russia cant produce the Su-57 to the numbers of the F-35

There are a lot of comments that miss the real point of stealth. Stealth does not mean undetectable. Low detectable to some extent, but all stealth aircraft are detectable by radar. Specifically, stealth technology does not work particularly well against low frequency radar. So the real advantage for stealth aircraft is that it is very difficult to get a radar lock on them. Radar lock needs high frequency radar and stealth works pretty well in reducing radar returns to high frequency radars making radar lock difficult. The question then is how stealthy do you need to be. Russian stealth technology is definitely inferior to US stealth but Russians emphasize building planes that are highly maneuverable while US expects to win in BVR engagements. We’ll see which works out better at some point, perhaps.

@thewedge8823

10 ай бұрын

American stealth has never been tested against brand new Russian air defense systems... particularly the S-400, and the upcoming S-500. Stealth will not work against those at all.

@jozefhorvat3625

10 ай бұрын

Absolutely true mate 👍👍👍

@Reflect02

10 ай бұрын

​@@thewedge8823US banned all pilot to come near S-400 lol

@ivicamilosavljevic4706

10 ай бұрын

That "Ohotnik" drone is not stealth... Particular problem is engine exhaust, that is mounted just like when kids create r/c plane. It is visible by all usable IC devices, even the oldest ones. I once followed 4 airplanes for kilometers, with my CAT S-60 telephone FLIR camera, while it was operational (using this comment, to mention that it was not water and impact resistant, as it was advertised! Water entered easily, and a small impact destroyed it! ). That UAV has a good weight over engine strength ratio, that allows it to carry a lot of ordinance, and if You attach to it some good gliding bombs or cruise missiles, that can be fired far from the target, that's OK, but there is no way to use it as some deep penetrator to the enemy territory, without air dominance. Let's go back to 1999. Yugoslavia, where we downed one (Grounded on our territory) , and damaged the other two F-117 at a time, 25 yrs ago, state of the art, stealth fighters. There are other planes damaged and downed like F-16, B-2, A-10, and some more... we could have done better, but threats from US military generals, towards retaliation to the civilian population stopped us in our effort, even to prevent extraction of the downed pilots (of course, we wouldn't harm them, as we didn't dose 3 guys captured on the ground, that were released in a few days)...In any case, US has "lessons learned", we do also. Some other countries, And blocks of countries - also... Time will show what is more effective and needed... In my humble opinion, stealth aircraft, with their incredible funding, were usable, and made success during the Irak attack only, after that became obsolete. There showed complete potential, in collaboration with false target drones, launched at the same time during first nights, to prevail in the air. Nowadays, tactics and strategy are way different... time will show, in any case... All of us learned something, so we will see. More important by me is how much all of that costs! Some people don't have to eat, some are in credits, economies are falling, because governments invest in stealth and new technologies, frightening their population, while they are living on the yachts, and private islands... War is not that terrifying! Actually it is, but it's unneeded...I was involved 3 times, but it is easier to go, and finish it in a few years, and continue your life, than to suffer all life long, paying someone, for something that You don't understand, and it's unneeded, just that they could make their way of living... ;)

@alexomar2010

10 ай бұрын

Su-27 and su-35 have intercepted US f-35 so it means US is not ahead from Russia in terms of stealth advancements, f-35 is the US stealthiest fighter aircrafts.

You say using this ohotnik..... Is an escalation. Only the US let's things escalate..... Slava Russia from Belgium.

@giacomoneri1782

10 ай бұрын

The bridge in Crimea was considered a terrorist attack on Russian civil infrastructure. Since it happened before, and Russian response was to bomb Ukraine power facilities, my guess is they could respond with a similar reaction, sending out bombers on Kiev side to destroy power plants and ammo warehouses. By the way, it isn't a deliberate escalation, but a reaction to an attack on Russian soil with Russian civilians dead.

@AMERICANPATRIOT1945

10 ай бұрын

You are from Belgium, really? You literally owe your freedom to write comments here on KZread to US "escalation" that defeated Hitler and his henchmen in WWII and then kept Soviet Russian communists from invading Western European countries including Belgium during the Cold War. It was US "escalation" that defeated the Soviet Russians and saved Eastern Europe from brutal and murderous Soviet Russian occupation. It was the Russians who invaded Ukraine without any provocation whatsoever in 2014 when Russia illegally invaded and annexed Crimea and infiltrated Eastern Ukraine. Think about that fact before you accuse the USA of "escalating" conflict against totalitarian states such as Russia, China, and North Korea.

@regkinsman5429

10 ай бұрын

Correct. Russia was provoked even baited into this proxy war by Joe, Boris Johnson and NATO. The clown,comic or comedian was and is too stupid to see it. Russia is 100%. If this was war from day one it would have been all over on 3 days. Russia/Vladimir Putin did and does not want to demolish Ukraine that is why it's a special operation.... otherwise all tunnels, bridges, railway lines, airports, electricity and water infrastructure would have been history.

@r423sdex

10 ай бұрын

Crimea belongs to Ukraine. They don't want the bridge.

@coltonjoseph1699

10 ай бұрын

Usa is the only tarriost here Slava Russia from 🇨🇦 Canada

Remember don't underestimate Russian military industrial complex and it's capabilities... Look at what happened to Ukraines counter offensive season 2.... It's catastrophically failure 😹😹😹

@danielsnook7362

10 ай бұрын

like how the Russian offensive recently failed when you're the offensive side fighting an entrenched opponent no s*** you can take losses

@ragincajun2446

10 ай бұрын

lets talk about Russia then 3 day special military operation confirmed by RT (Russian Today) as well as Lukashenko (Belarusian dictator) should've been over in 3 days its now day 505+ Russia has confirmed to of lost 11,000 of its armored vehicles compared to Ukraines 3,900 Russia is losing very badly in a war they started yet they complain we send weapons even tho USSR sent weapons to Vietnamese and America didn't give a shit, now u have all these Russians crying like bitches cause they r getting backhanded single handily by Ukraine with NATO weapons that were meant to kill Russians, btw counter attacks such as this 1 haven't started off full they still have 60/75% of NATO weaponry is yet to be used as they r conducting probing attacks trying to find the weakest link which u have no clue how they work look at the ilium offensive or the Kherson offensive the Kherson offensive took back 8,000 sq km of land back from terroist Russia

@dernopenope2005

10 ай бұрын

War is complicated, russian troops are so deeply entranched and they had weeks to prepare. itll be bloody and burtal to get trought the different layers of obstacles, but there is a big fat BUTT russia is not capable to fight back to retake positions (or when only marginaly) because of poor logistics, bad communication, lack of training and moral. Those drones in here are fancy but the numbers will be way to little to make a strategic difference, tactically sure tho. Russia has a lot of projects to hype up support for its armed forces (T14, checkmate, T15, those robot thingis, the cal50 resistant armour etccccc) but its all hype for propaganda. The country has a history of ligitimising its political support via military wins (mostly against low pear adverseries, and even against those they took an insane amount of time and people to be able to claim victory) and those weapons are a small win on the homefront but nothing more.

@DetroitMicroSound

10 ай бұрын

How about the Kerch bridge? How about those big explosions in Crimea, very recently?

@FXGreggan.

10 ай бұрын

If you wanna talk about catastrophical failure just look at the russian invasion :)

This war should end

@karayuschij

Ай бұрын

🤟

@wadopotato33

28 күн бұрын

Yeah, but how?

I wonder if we'll get some sort of drone carrier aircraft in the near future, since small drones could have a much longer range if they were launched at high altitude.

@georgepantazis141

10 ай бұрын

There already Here.

@shresthishigwcivpadt9713

10 ай бұрын

@@georgepantazis141 No

@stradorious4467

4 ай бұрын

Russians want to turn some of their SU-57s into drone carriers. (Irl arsenal bird be like)

@Chimnaay

3 ай бұрын

Like in Starcraft….a giant floating aircraft carrier that unleashes thousands of small drones. That paired with a EW asset to hide its signature as it hunts targets would be a scary sight.

@ClaudeMagicbox

Ай бұрын

It's to me pretty clear that the future of combat aviation are high-flying fast and stealth "mothership platforms", like an evolution of todays AWACs planes with a dozen of drone operators on board + SigInt and Comm personnel to network battle information from satellites and ground radars. The "motherships" don't necessarily deploy the drones themselves but rather manage swarms of large ground based Okhotink style drones (and possibly also can deploy a certain number of smaller defensive drones to protect themselves while in flight).

Radar can't detect but it was spotted ! Mindblowing !

It would be interesting to know if the Okhotnik carries an onboard radar, and if so, if it can effectively extend the detection/engagement range of it's parent Su-57.

@globalterroil3208

9 ай бұрын

"...During the flight, the UAV interacted with the Su-57 to test extending the fighter's radar and target designation range for long-range air-launched weapons outside enemy air defence coverage, the MoD reported...." (Jane's 360, Sep 27, 2019, _Russia’s Okhotnik UAV makes first flight with Su-57_ )

@pravindahiya719

6 ай бұрын

a 25 ton drone - without a radar ? how can you even imagine that ?

Every radar with 10cm wave lenght can detect stealth or stealthy aircraft. Problem is to pin point it. Thats why mm wave lenght radars have been invented and stealth works in minimising the reflextion of such radars

@stevannikolovski

10 ай бұрын

Yes it was old soviet shortwave radars that saw F-117 in 1999. With reduced reflection, but you cannot have flock of birds flying 700-800Km/h so it was obvious to trained radar operator.

@andreiminin4738

10 ай бұрын

Yes, you have to put 1/4 or better 1/2 of wave length thick coating to consume wave energy. Mm radars were popular on the West while Ussr used sm and ever meter radars. There is also 120 degree reflection, as additional factor, but it doesn't work with long wave radars. keep in mind passive location systems - you must shutdown all radio emitters

@Leader977

10 ай бұрын

Same valid for U.S. F22 and F35.

@dorange_

2 ай бұрын

the only smart guy in the room

IRST systems placed in various locations around the countryside is how to "see" it. That large open nozzle on the back of this Russian drone is a big Heat signature "Howdy". If you will Notice, our drones similar to this, like the RQ 180 and others, we defuse the exhaust and/or hide it from being seen from below, in where we orient it on the A/C. The exhaust will be on top of rear of aircraft, on the most stealthy planes, with any exhaust having a piece or shelf of extended fuselage underneath it hiding it. A ground heat seeking missile system won't get a lock on it that way.

One up for Russia, agany US says their technology is useless. They were the first to gointo space , walk in space ,first Satellite, First nuclear power plant. First, nuclear submarines., And on and on.

@yugbe

Ай бұрын

Russia has no doubt proven they can get to the finish line first a lot of the time, but rarely can they complete the marathon over time. But, this system poses a new kind of threat. Imagine a very large mass production and the utilization of 10 drones per one manned aircraft. This is a big jump for them.

@wadopotato33

28 күн бұрын

First Nuclear Sub was the USS Nautilus...you are mistaken there.

Never underestimate the enemy

@anonydun82fgoog35

2 ай бұрын

Unless of course you ARE the "enemy" in which case oh yes please keep underestimating us!

Let's see, it's too early to know it

Very nice combination SU57 and SU70. Great buddy.

@32167BD

10 ай бұрын

planned - one SU and two drones under AI control

Geezzz.....it looks so familiar

The Horten Ho 229 was the first winged aircraft developed in 1943 Germany

@briann2399

2 ай бұрын

Nie był pierwszym. To bardzo stara koncepcja.

@anonydun82fgoog35

2 ай бұрын

Confirming that before 1943 aircraft didn't have wings! I think you meant "flying wing". Pretty much all aircraft have some sort of wing!

@wadopotato33

28 күн бұрын

Not at all true. American wasnt first either, but had a flying wing plane called the Avion experimental 1 (Northrop) which flew in 1929. The Horton is the mozt famous...but not first. And anyone who knows about flying wings will also recognize that the American love affair with the design didnt come from Germany as the the B-2 is actually almost exactly the same dimesnions of Northrop's flying wing.

Ну прям телеканал "Звезда" =)))

Why does the bomber look like it always has it's landing gear out?

I like the sound you use in your vidios. The tone is fantastic ❤❤❤

Spotting a stealth plane isn't a big deal completing the kill chain is. Detect, track and kill.

I stand to be corrected, I believe the Serbs shot down a stealth 117A in the ninety’s by triangulating cell phone towers and detecting a void in the signal and firing. If this is true the technology cannot be that complex to identify an S 70 drone and shoot down a drone.

@joytibloom293

10 ай бұрын

Perhaps, but then again, its unmanned, so no loss in manpower and can do whatever manoeuvre that might be hard for a human pilot on board?

@pogo1140

10 ай бұрын

Nope, the SAM commander said they got lucky. Their long range radar saw something at less than 20 miles but the fire control radar of the SA-2 did not see anything until the F-117 was inside 12 miles. the plane was at around 10-11 miles when the missile reached it. Same radar, only F-35, the SA-2 operator would be able to see the plane with his naked eyes before the guidance radar does.

@somaday2595

10 ай бұрын

Fluke- F-117's bay doors were open when radar detected it.

@andrewaustin6369

8 ай бұрын

Yeah the F117 that got shot down was because the pilots routinely flew the same route against procedure and didn't activate all the stealth features and as someone else said the bay doors were open it was a fault of the aircrew not the aircraft.

@pogo1140

8 ай бұрын

@@andrewaustin6369 also if the EA-6B that normally provided jamming had been on station, the radar would have never seen it at all

Man that thing sure looks like another thing I've seen.

@Matt-yg8ub

2 ай бұрын

The physics are the same regards who produces a stealth airframe… they pretty much all look alike

Vertigo bomber, standing by!

Russia should use what he have the best,US n Europe always manipulate situation nd under estimate the other countries.even US n Europe promised Russia not expanding toward eastern europe but time by time now NATO expansion reached at Russian borders nd now Ukrain going to be use in hand of America.

@Corbin97

Ай бұрын

Sorry, we cannot help that countries want to join NATO. We will not bow to any country that dictates they can't either.

Interesting idea. So the Okhotnik is intended to deeply penetrate enemy airspace undetected and deliver a payload against its target. It will have the ability to fly in tandem with the Felon who while having stealth like capabilities is not fully stealth. This means that while harder to detect, enemy radar would still be able to detect the SU-57. However, the Su-57 is equipped with the technology to allow it to find and engage both the F-22 and the F-35. So the picture I see is as follows: Russia decides to hit a target, in this case protected by American assets. So they launch their S-70 towards the target. As their S-70 approaches enemy airspace (or just before or sometime after depending on the mission) they launch their SU-57 and send them toward the enemy airspace. If everything works as desired the S-70 delivers its payload undetected, however the payload itself is evident the drone is in the area. As the S-70 makes its way back to Russian air-space, the SU-35 enters enemy airspace where somewhere along the way it meets up with the drone and provides coverage against the F-22 or F-35. Not a bad plan at all... If it works.

@anchorread68

10 ай бұрын

Opponent might be able to spoof or jam satellite that communicate with a drone, so in my opinion it should always be deployed with SU-57. Peer-to-peer communication between jet will be hard to spoof or jam from the ground.

@majorian4897

10 ай бұрын

Stealth is largely a meme as soon as ANYONE turns on their radars it's ogre it's like trying to hide a flying broadcasting cell phone tower.

@adityagajjar3118

10 ай бұрын

It is tandem flight of manned aircraft and loyal wing man . While wingman will enter enemy territory and deliver the payload . Get out of enemy airspace and will join its defender on their way back.

@joshuaalistair3193

10 ай бұрын

@@anchorread68 Hmm, we did that with drones and the Longbow back in Afghanistan. At the end of the day if you can spoof or jam a satellite signal, you can do the same with a plane to drone signal.

@joshuaalistair3193

10 ай бұрын

@@adityagajjar3118 Yes, I get that. But go back and read what I posted and then think it through a bit. The SU-57 can be picked up by radar, the S-70 cannot. So if the SU-57 escorts the S-70 to the enemy airspace then the SU-57 just alerted the enemy radar to start looking for a S-70... see how the wingman logic doesn't always pan out?

this is the future clearly I would think also to a stealth drone interceptor But stealth is more important than everything really

If their still just barely gettin out of testing how many of these could be actually operating?

WHY SHOU;D THERE BE A BALANCE IN A CONFLICT?

@RickyJr46

10 ай бұрын

To protect the long-term interests of money laundering.

@SeaJay_Oceans

10 ай бұрын

Genocide takes time, comrade... Russia now conscripting men up to 70 years old... who needs social security programs, when Putin sends all the elderly to fight on the Front lines ?

Его не корпус делает невидимым, а установленная в него система РЭБ...

It’s an interesting looking drone…but it’s thermal signature will be massive with that nozzle at the back..

@dailyindopak

10 ай бұрын

Russia is testing a flat nozzle engine for su57,the same can be used for s70

@christianschellbruck9788

5 ай бұрын

if thats a big problem, than every stealth fighter in the world would have the same problem. So i guess its not such a big deal if you are not directly behind the aircraft. Or how could the Amercian F22 or F35 even work?

@volatilecolon

Ай бұрын

@@christianschellbruck9788 F-22 has a reduced IR signature due to its clamshell nozzle design.

When you buy your stealth plane from Wish.

@BigSmartArmed

10 ай бұрын

Russian physicist developed the equation that is used to model RCS, the only "Wish" here is you knowing anything about anything.

@dfloper

10 ай бұрын

When you waste time on youtube instead of doing your homework.

@kudalkarshadab

9 ай бұрын

​@@dfloper😂😂😂😂😂😂

@kristianpahe4639

Ай бұрын

@@BigSmartArmed What is the Russian physicist's name?

@Corbin97

Ай бұрын

​@@BigSmartArmedinteresting, using a Scottish physicist work.

that thing looks very similar to the RQ-170, I wonder why?

@lunazero433

10 ай бұрын

All I see is the horten..

@operamini6

10 ай бұрын

Iran managed to force landing RQ-170 in 2011. Probably reverse engineered by Russian later.

@bl8danjil

10 ай бұрын

Stealth designs are pretty generic right now.

@ViceCoin

10 ай бұрын

Stealth design is limited.

@anatoleondulet4881

10 ай бұрын

Nothing to do with RQ-170, S70 is based on a shovel shape.

Make sure that all information is true. I am your sbscriber.

Real test on the Battlefield!

They've been in service since 2019 and Russia is expected to have a 4.5% GDP this quarter.

@wadopotato33

28 күн бұрын

Russia has a little bump from putting their economy into a wartime footing. Those sorts of bumps are artifical and not sustainable long term. Russia is fucked.

@jasondotson6287

26 күн бұрын

@@wadopotato33 Just the opposite pal. Their economy is kicking...bootlick the MSM all you want dude. Ukraine will be in negotiations with Russia before the end of the year.

All 2 of them are sure gonna make a huge difference

@serdgeedgerunner

10 ай бұрын

:)

@lubodishlqnov9454

10 ай бұрын

Man the mass production is ready!They just w8 for testing

@gasdorficmuncher9943

Ай бұрын

like hitlers Vonderweapons ww2

@Corbin97

Ай бұрын

​@lubodishlqnov9454 considering they are drones, I sure hope so. Everyone has drones. Some choose not to show them.

Some fancy flying shovels that ....

nice prototype..some people afraid of ghost even there was no ghost place

A big thank you to Walter and Reimar Horten .

@timper4326

10 ай бұрын

Don't forget Jack Northrop, his worked.

@markiobook8639

10 ай бұрын

You bet

@wadopotato33

28 күн бұрын

Only if you believe that Germans were the only ones working on flying wings designs. The stealth bombers the US made come from Northrop work on the flying wing and that work predates the Hortens. Avion Experimental #1 flew in 1929 and happens to be the same company that made the B-2. If fact, the B-2 was the same rough dimensions as the Northrop flying wings.

What delicate balance?!?! Russia is kicking butt.

@whatfreedom7

Ай бұрын

They have really only made small ground in over 2 years against a poorly equipped military. They aren’t kicking butt at all but they aren’t loosing either. It’s honestly more of a stalemate lately.

@volatilecolon

Ай бұрын

What war have you been watching?

@Corbin97

Ай бұрын

I learned today, that the definition of kicking butt is, barely being able to occupy half a country that borders you, and is a 30th of your size.

@wadopotato33

28 күн бұрын

They occupy 20% of a cou try they tried to invade 3 years ago...where's the ass kicking? Dumb.

maybe has a radar signature of a vw bug cause the su57 has the signature of a truck.

@starikanleks3198

10 ай бұрын

И только f 80000 не видем, даже для нло потому что он сделан в демократически свободном сша да?😂 или тебе так сказали CNN?😂

The wing man drones are a game changer. The US is doing this as well

I am sure it will work as well as the T-14 tank.

@scrubvision5652

10 ай бұрын

it will work better then destroyed bradleys and leopard 2

@militaryfall5147

10 ай бұрын

The T-14 is used to repel counterattacks at Kremennaya. Engine problems have been fixed for a long time.

@thewedge8823

10 ай бұрын

no need to even deploy the T-14..... T-90m is killing it now.

@ibitefingers3380

10 ай бұрын

​@@scrubvision5652What about the thousands of destroyed Russian tanks before the Bradley's and.leopards got to Ukraine? Or does thag not count since it doesn't fit your propaganda

@scrubvision5652

10 ай бұрын

@@ibitefingers3380 it doesnt matter how many tanks get destroyed mate russians lost like 83 thousand tanks in ww2 what matters is who will win and so far russians look in better shape regardless of what your bs media is pushing war of attrition russians have more shells more manpower and more tanks and other equipment

It was inevitable that with the Russian military budget being smaller than the West, they would have to resort to robotic Stealth aircraft rather than manned. The questions are how many can they make, and how vulnerable will they be to interference? Interesting that the footage of the aircraft in flight shows conventional engine exhausts, not the slotted ones of the drawings. Will it have a more advanced version later, or was that just a mistake?

@coshyno

10 ай бұрын

It might be smaller but the US with its massive budget has a lot of corruption. People think Russia is corrupt but imagine the US, being a democracy does not mean that it is not a corrupt country. Russia, when ever it invests money on new weapons system, tends to get the same result for a lot less money. More money does not mean better, not always.

@Neoblades

10 ай бұрын

From what I read in the Russian forums of military affairs this is the first prototype, they are using and testing it and if it is shot down the problem will not be so great

@user-xk9jw6gh2j

10 ай бұрын

​​@@coshynoв США нет ни демократии ни свободы слова а в России есть демократия и свобода слова смотри Такер Карлсона

@MrKasugano

10 ай бұрын

@@coshyno Oh brother, the corruption issue has in any country in any industry, it depends solely on the personal traits to serve your country and your countrymen. No ideal country exist on that topic. Wasted US military budget is that only because USA prints $ itself so they can invest more, be it in Euro currency the outcome would be different.

@andreiminin4738

10 ай бұрын

There is flight simulator from M$ inside - no need to reinvent wheel - added arduino, joystick, wifi router and it is working! Forgot couple chips from loundry machine (coffee maker will work too)...

How many of these are there ? Oh yeah not very many ! Actually an obscenely small amount. It's an important device but not at scale.

Amazing state of the art radars can't pick them up but Joe Bloggs walking his dog can see them with his naked eye 😆👍

Diante dos meios aéreos utilizados, esta pode ser chamada a guerra dos drones. Com a preparação dos robôs de combate, eles podem operar simultâneo com os drones de reconhecimento e ataque ao solo.

Não esquecam quê os russos ja derubou o poderoso storm shadow,deus abençoe o sistema de guerra eleteonica russo 🇷🇺🇧🇷

@damonburroughs5283

10 ай бұрын

Crimea disagrees

@victorpeixoto5792

10 ай бұрын

Sempre tem um Brasileiro retardado defendendo o errado. certeza que fez o L. carniça!!!

Damn it looks similar to b-12 bomby

Ahh, I love this channel, it's full of nuance and objectivity, it reminds me RT news...

Not likely to see them ever (I mean with all the stealth and shit) Guess the T14 Armata also is super stealth cos we havn´t seen them either as of yet

@scrubvision5652

10 ай бұрын

repeat the same thing over and over again you sheep cant come up with something new ? all energy wasted in picking up dresses as a man ?

@benchapman2210

10 ай бұрын

Imagine a prototype has already seen action than F22 which is good at shooting baloons😂

@scrubvision5652

10 ай бұрын

@@benchapman2210 if f22 enters combact i bet it will be the biggest fraud in the history of military just like f117

@Reflect02

10 ай бұрын

T-90M are killing ur leopard boy right now, cri cri

@Reflect02

10 ай бұрын

​@@benchapman2210even second time lmao... For a fcking balloon

Time will tell

gratitude to the collective West for giving impetus to the development of Russian military technologies.

@Corbin97

Ай бұрын

Still subpar.

A game changer: 16 mini R-77 AAM (similar to CUDA/Peregrine) or 2 Kh-50/ Kab 1500 etc.

Wow N 1 stelth Drone

Wow impresionante bravo Rusia 🇷🇺💪🇦🇷

There are only two S-70 Okhotnik Stealth Bomber Drones in existence.....

@tu1469

10 ай бұрын

And neither of them have been detected to shoot down what more can one ask for😂

@crazygamingyt7245

3 ай бұрын

@@tu1469yeah they are gonna start mass producing them in 2024 buddy….

@aardvarkbiscuit2677

2 ай бұрын

and Russia has only two missiles left in their arsenal.

@gasdorficmuncher9943

Ай бұрын

funny how it gets used during victory day month then they will put it away like the t14 tanks

@Corbin97

Ай бұрын

​@@crazygamingyt7245it's 2024, so where is the mass production? Sure hope yall can keep it a secret like the U.S does. Not great to unviel a "drone" and not have more than 2.

Even if it were true, we don’t send our latest and greatest over there. We have the tech for sure, we just aren’t sharing it.

A competition no doubt

funny how it looks very similar to US stealth bomber in shape .

@anatoleondulet4881

10 ай бұрын

Wrong ! it's based on shovel shape.

@dannysema6786

10 ай бұрын

But not funny why this works so well.

@anchorread68

10 ай бұрын

same shape since WW2, Horten Ho 229 prototype, year 1944. The shape follows some physical law, cannot change, only the internal component can be changed.

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

9 ай бұрын

Physics is the same for everyone

@abderahmandj3845_muslim

8 ай бұрын

So the american looks like the nazi one

I love this channel than watching milley speeches

@roshanwadasinghe7294

10 ай бұрын

Nato troll detected

Which ringtone is this. Kindly let him know. I want to listen l

Or picture tracking or sound tracking... to target them

@blackgalaxy901

10 ай бұрын

That is if you see it on the radar screen first, when you see the picture or hear the sound, you are done.

You say this may be a changing factor in the delicate balance 😂 There is no delicate balance Russia is in total control over the battle.

I am no expert on stealth but this craft has a lot of things sticking out on the top and front that would not help with keeping the radar signature low. Also the engine sticking out of the back as far as it does can`t be good for a low heat signature.

@Brutus-hv5ql

10 ай бұрын

Funny how that stealthy graphic design doesn’t match that actual, real world structure. We can see it.

@maksimluzin1121

10 ай бұрын

Do you see a difference between a Su-57 'test prototype' and 'serial production' one?

@maksimluzin1121

10 ай бұрын

A lot of sensors on a test prototype, just to collect the info as much as possible, from all directions, so a lot of 'antennas'... The serial ones will be 'slim' and 'flat'...😊

@tankconquerer5428

10 ай бұрын

Its specifically designed to protect itself from ground air deffence missiles probably.

@maksimluzin1121

10 ай бұрын

@@tankconquerer5428 , it is a 'test prototype', not a serial/production one. It Must to have a lot of antennas, sensors, intakes, etc to Collect all the data how it's working! Like a bug, full of the antennas/sensors/acceptors everywhere on its body... The 'environmental awareness', just to collect what is it around you and 'who are you' in the 'environment'... Nothing more.

Just remember those fighter jets are only as good as the pilot in the seat!

Na just ad more heat seeking misels longer range type.

No1

That exhaust is definately not stealthy...

@eeJOKERee

10 ай бұрын

dude the enemy will be using radar not binoculars lmao🤣

@theprotagonist8755

10 ай бұрын

​@@eeJOKEReeyet here you are beating off to it

@ThisIsMyRealName

10 ай бұрын

@@eeJOKERee dude just the heat signature itself will give it away ...lmfao

@umu8934

10 ай бұрын

​@@ThisIsMyRealNameit's already said in the video they only spotted it after it bomb a district in Sumy region... So if the Ukrainian using a air defense radar why they didn't shoot it down immediately 😹😹😹 Sometimes you need to use simple logic and common sense bruh😸🙃🤪

@DetroitMicroSound

10 ай бұрын

@@eeJOKERee many weapons systems can track heat signatures, too.

If western radar can’t see it how was it spotted by the naked eye!

A Horton with a FOAB.

Never mind it has a giant Naked Exposed Jet nozzle Flame Thrower sticking out the rear that glows WHITE HOT on infra-Red.. Just take our word for it, it is stealth lol

@avengerpz

10 ай бұрын

And? How close you have to be to see it? In altitude of 5 kms you cant even see the plane, but you think you will see the flame, yeah right. You barely can see it on video that was shoot some dozen meters away from it, but you gonna see it from 5km or more, good joke, By the way ... did you watched the video on infra red so you know? 😁

@Trebor74

10 ай бұрын

​@@avengerpzcan't be that stealthy if they've got a photo of it and it's been seen.

@sumerbc7409

10 ай бұрын

@@avengerpz They don't use 'eyeballs' to lock onto enemy aircraft with weapons you idiot. Hi technology anti air systems can see it's radar and HEAT signature just fine. silly

@ali-haider5788

10 ай бұрын

The new su57 they changed the engine to a new stealthy kme

@sumerbc7409

10 ай бұрын

@@ali-haider5788 Or so you Hope haha lol.

If it is visible to the eyes it can be shut down by portable anti-tank weapons.

@linux9846

10 ай бұрын

ok, Mr Rambo

@malcolmt7883

10 ай бұрын

@@linux9846 You can also hit it with a hammer if it's on the ground

@linux9846

10 ай бұрын

@@malcolmt7883 Yes, General, Sir General Rambo

@maxmustermann19203

10 ай бұрын

thats like using a 22lr on a anti air canon

@RealJustLaw

10 ай бұрын

A few shots from a Pistol should drop it outta the sky 🤡

Nice!

One creation is making improves over other one. That´s how humanity advanced. Unfortunately this time as many times , for destruction of the same humankind

Western weapons in Ukraine from Leo2 ,himars to stormshadows overall was proven to be ineffective so far against Russian defense hence the failure of the counter offensive by Ukraine, western tech has been captured and their flaws and advantage will surely be scrutinized by Russian experts.

@fgm1197

10 ай бұрын

Every weapon system has flaws don't be so negative. The counter offensive didn't fail it is just going slower than desired. And btw. do you know the kill/death ration of a Leo2(for example) against Russian tanks? .... What do you expect? Do you expect 16 Leo2A6 tanks to win this war? Don't be so negative. patience!

@nasha5292

10 ай бұрын

@@fgm1197 just like the leo2 they considered it as the best tank in the world even the abrams lost to it, underestimating the enemy is the keyword, Germany during ww2 did thesame calling russians as subhumans, that is why Germany was crushed and their soldiers were paraded in the streets of moscow.

@damonburroughs5283

10 ай бұрын

Well the strikes on russian bases today say otherwise don't they lol

@babycannis9667

10 ай бұрын

Put your money where your mouth is . Russian air defences can barely take down HIMARS rockets much less storm shadow . Why do you think so many Russians military bases are bring BBQ’d ? Stop chatting garbage and remember propaganda does not win on the battlefield. Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦

@fgm1197

10 ай бұрын

@nasha5292 Lol no matter how strong their orc army is they are subhumans. They rape, murder and loot. They haven't evolved a bit the last 80 years.

on paper and in their imagination, yes

Looks like a shovel.

Doesn't look like a stealth shovel to me

US sent the switchblade drones to Ukraine in the beginning of the war. Russia took the idea and mastering this idea carving holes in the ukraine counteroffensive

@_Coffee4Closers

10 ай бұрын

LOL... You mean they bought some from 3rd World Iran.

Looks about as stealthy as a drunk 16 year old sneaking back thru an upper story window after partying all night.

Wow I just ignore what a washing machine chip can do , amazing !

Do you need some new crayons to draw your mythical military with ?

B2b was wisible on radar and one was shoted down B2b ( Spirit of Missury) 1999.on NATO agresion on Serbia by Serbian Anty Air Defense with S-125 NEVA, same batery who shoted down F-117 A , this batery of Serbian AAD was shoted down and F-16 C ,plain wich pilot was be David Golfride, now US four star General and chef of staf of U.S.A.F ! Only white nation and only Europin country who defited NATO was Serbia ! No one can shoted down S-70 Ohotnik or Rusian Suhoy and Mikoyan Gurevic airplanes !

@pogo1140

10 ай бұрын

No B-2 have ever been shot down. 1 crashed on takeoff, 2 are undergoing repairs due to damage on landing

@pluffer96

9 ай бұрын

In your dreams, low life!

@Corbin97

Ай бұрын

Think you mean the f-117, which is not in service anymore. Considering Russias drone has only been shown once, and they have less than 5, I'd imagine they are not going to put into the position where it can get shot down. Sorry to say both of your examples have been shot down, though for the third one, I'm not sure what model you are talking about.

Would be funny if they give the A.I text to speech so the okhotnik actually talks to the pilots would probably give some hilarious moments

Why won’t Biden allow Ukraine to negotiate peace?

@PCai2012

10 ай бұрын

Peace ?? Nope..Nahh.. no profit for war monger's..

@jollygreen4662

10 ай бұрын

Won't won't Russian return all the stolen land to Ukraine?

@zero1breaker

10 ай бұрын

money money money hello money in the political world.

@tolabassist3302

10 ай бұрын

Idk maybe nobody wants to lose land

@ztcajun

10 ай бұрын

It's not the US, its Ukraine and can you blame them? If you lost a quarter of your house would you not want it back?

America invented and continues to perfect stealth systems do not underestimate their ability to detect, lock onto, engage and destroy lesser as well as more advanced stealth technologies.

There sure are a lot of protruding surfaces for a stealth drone….

@47486459

10 ай бұрын

Plus there seems to be no effort to minimize the engines exhaust.

@BigSmartArmed

10 ай бұрын

The only RCS angle that matters is the the weapon approach angle.

If my memory serves me correctly, back during the Iraq conflict we had smart bombs that would attack radar installations, seems we could develop a system that would target their jamming systems just just the same in my opinion.

@DODSexualMisconductOffic-ko6ws

10 ай бұрын

It be great if the other party strengthen their technically accum nd upgrade the current system to be more lethal make it sure that you keep on spending substantial amount on toys as the U.S can't stand competition.

@AugustSchroif

10 ай бұрын

It's safe to assume those bombs were smarter than people writing comments on youtube nowadays,.

@thatonedude2228

10 ай бұрын

Antiradar missiles from SEAD aircraft, they target the radiowaves

@pogo1140

10 ай бұрын

It's called home on jam, missiles as far back as the Phoenix missile had them, so does the AIM-120 and all of the US Anti-radiation missiles

@Matt-yg8ub

2 ай бұрын

Just about everybody already has that

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

a swarm of carbon fiber wing with oxygen mask pilot and cheap jet could reach high altitude , still cost less than single fighter seems like they need drones or back to machine guns but the with mg the swarm could take on the expensive jets imo....