Alec Baldwin Attorney Drops Bombshell While Grilling Crime Scene Technician
While cross-examining a crime scene technician, Alec Baldwin's defense attorney, Alex Spiro, dropped a bombshell saying that a retired officer went to the police station and dropped off live ammunition that killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins after convicted armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed's trial. The officer is reportedly a close friend of the armorer's father. The prosecutor refuted the claim under redirect, stating the ammo brought into the station doesn't match the live ammo on the set of "Rust."
Subscribe to Law&Crime Trials for More Courtroom Coverage: bit.ly/LawAndC...
Watch More Alec Baldwin Trial Clips: bit.ly/AlecBal...
Famed actor and movie producer Alec Baldwin was indicted on one count of involuntary manslaughter in January for the death of 42-year-old cinematographer Halyna Hutchins. Hutchins died on Baldwin’s “Rust” movie set. Armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for Hutchins’ death. She was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
#AlecBaldwin #HalynaHutchins #LawandCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on KZreadTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK KZread CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
Пікірлер: 2 400
Watch More Alec Baldwin Trial Clips: bit.ly/AlecBaldwinTrial
@rollbamaroll6518
Ай бұрын
Always considered myself pro-law enforcement but this investigator has ZERO credibility. Defense absolutely destroyed her in my opinion. Proved she is there to regurgitate what the prosecution prepped her to say. She expects this jury to believe she doesn’t recall being told the ammunition was what killed the victim and also exactly what kind it was in terms of matching the live ammo that was in the firearm. “I don’t recall”🤥🤥🤥what a joke. She would have clung to every word regarding that ammo that they were looking for to find the source of how it got on the set. This investigator has zero desire to tell the truth and the whole truth and more so interested in convicting Baldwin and being the prosecutor’s puppet. I think it’s a joke Baldwin is being charged honestly. Had a responsible armorer and this doesn’t happen. Period. .
@BlackStump172
Ай бұрын
@@rollbamaroll6518She sounds just like the witnesses in your Congress ! 😂
@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307
Ай бұрын
Strange how nearly everyone who does this with their own firearm which they are responsible for loading and unloading never gets charged! He should be charged as a person responsible for running everything!
@sallygard63
Ай бұрын
@@rollbamaroll6518I totally agree 👍
@words.Of.Truth.
Ай бұрын
Why would anybody want to watch it It's not newsworthy on a national level
Hot Tip: don't smirk in the witness box when you're appearing professionally, with the rare exception that the court laugh first...And nobody was laughing, least of all the judge
@markieffmorris9263
Ай бұрын
7:28 her smugness is positively suffocating.
@kimmileusnic3249
Ай бұрын
She was being evasive and snarky. She intentionally mentioned a bullet that killed
@rustshoo5068
Ай бұрын
It’s just a way of controlling one’s nerves.
@Gravy_Master
Ай бұрын
Wow Drew - thanks for that “Hot Tip.” 🤢🤢🤢🤮
Her evasive memory, movements, and smirks conjure suspicions beyond any testimony she gave.
@MC-oh1ju
Ай бұрын
And because of that he’s free
@MikeRivNY
Ай бұрын
😂 the body language expert over here
@rizzomatt
Ай бұрын
Totally sus BS evasive answers.
@dayinthelifeofmycat
Ай бұрын
Exactly!!!!
@rhgamecock1
Ай бұрын
Yes, along with how she kept looking at the prosecutor when the pressure was turned up.
My husband and mother were police officers, I’m embarrassed watching these police officers evading the questions from the defense. This is a case that the whole country is watching and the prosecution’s misconduct is disgraceful
@anoldgryphon
Ай бұрын
Worst police in the nation.
@Catherine-oe4tp
Ай бұрын
The world was watching, not only America. Quite frankly when anything happens and "America" happens to be mentioned, it's automatically treated as a joke
@My_Crazy_Neighbor
Ай бұрын
I also have law enforcement family members. One day one of them was telling a story about how one of her coworkers did something wrong that got an innocent person in a casket. She was telling the story from the position that this poor coworker now had to deal with being investigated.... Family or not, they are all in the same corrupt system helping each other do corrupt things.
@andrewellington9503
22 күн бұрын
@@My_Crazy_NeighborWow. That is some next level narcissim/main character syndrome type ish. Sure, an innocent man lost their life and an entire family lost a son who could've have also been a husband, grandson, father, uncle, grandfather, etc... but the only important part that matters is how bad the cop felt about being the reason it happened.
She should lose her job. She ABSOLUTELY buried the report.
@fernandaolivares7926
Ай бұрын
She was the ONE person from those 3 witches that actually saw the bullets looked the same. She should get fired, charged with perjury and sued by Alec. That will erase that disgusting smirk we had to endure.
@charisepfahl7778
Ай бұрын
She is done!
@cynthiarowley719
Ай бұрын
She was told to bury it, yes
@MaybeitsclusterB
Ай бұрын
Meh, I think Hancock is more responsible
@lorir5728
Ай бұрын
That's messed up. Tragic
Love the "selective" memory. Not suspicious at all....
@loisfolk5492
Ай бұрын
Agree she is edging on the answers. Probably just wants a conviction and not the truth.
@Charlie-lu1jn
Ай бұрын
She was so well rehearsed from the prosecution, that her sudden memory loss and glancing at the prosecution after every response after the defense questions her looks like she is panicked that "their" story is falling apart.
@Emily89420
Ай бұрын
And it's only when the defense is questioning her 🙄
@premierpollo
Ай бұрын
Yeah! Well you only got five subs, no thumbnail and fancy emojis. BIG DEAL! 🙄
@mothersgauri4137
Ай бұрын
@@premierpollo Nice trolling. No point made.
This witness seems very pleased with herself, she should be investigated to see if she was deliberately losing evidence
She just acts smirky,defiant and shady as heck.
Hiding evidence to get a conviction must never be tolerated. It is more common than we may hope.
@actual_doge3221
25 күн бұрын
Does this possibly mean Hannah should be let go? Because police kinda botched her case?
@frankhoffman3566
25 күн бұрын
@@actual_doge3221 Hannah? Who?
@samsschool3639
14 күн бұрын
@@frankhoffman3566 The Armorer, the girl responsible for the guns
@frankhoffman3566
14 күн бұрын
@@samsschool3639.... Sorry, I really don't follow celebrity trials. I really don't know the players or the charges against them.. It would be a situation where conduct would have to be analyzed in detail and I haven't done that.
Its called chain of custody, lady. She seems rather hostile if u ask me thoughout her testimony. Selective recall for sure
@mikeshoults4155
Ай бұрын
Boom, you nailed it. Chain of custody.
@appleblows1
Ай бұрын
She's hostile because she and a few others are about to lose their jobs and possibly lose their freedom.
@philliptaylor5386
Ай бұрын
“I don’t recall anything that makes me look guilty…” 😂
@crowevil4658
Ай бұрын
She the kind of lesbian nobody likes.
@geroutathat
12 күн бұрын
@@philliptaylor5386 his questions were designed to get "I dont recall" answers, she cant lie so he asked a bunch of stuff that she says on a daily basis and asked did she say any of it to him. He knows she doesnt hand over evidence to the defence its not her job but he asked it anyway to get her to say no. He knows her job is to just take the evidence and document it, and pretended he didnt know what that meant. He knows the error happened further up the chain of command but those would be too slick. So he asked a bunch of vague questions to get i dont know responses. Lets say her version is true, someone walked in, gave her some bullets said they were linked to the case, she called out a superior, they said document it and move on. She documented it, and moved on. Lets say while standing there she made idle chat, like she does with everyone, and now you ask her "did you talk about the weather?" "I dont recall", because if she says "no" and you have a recording then shes messed up big. "you told him youd get it rushed?" youd think "No" but cant be sure, because you know you have said that in past, so "i dont recall".
"I don't know - i don't recall" annoying, she knows she's getting away with this by smirking, contempt.
@MikeRivNY
Ай бұрын
You should be defending Alec.
@christinaeckhart2784
Ай бұрын
I think that's her normal face....
@dayinthelifeofmycat
Ай бұрын
I find her overall demeanor and appearance annoying. Now that the charges have been dismissed, this woman needs to be charged with perjury.
@Meoffjackk01
Ай бұрын
What is she getting away with. What did she do wrong
@shaunwalley
Ай бұрын
@@Meoffjackk01 Oh im sorry I don't know - i don't recall
She’s being so profoundly evasive. She’s so exposed and so is every corrupt officer involved in this case.
She lied under oath.
I don't trust what this lady is saying at all. She seems to have an agenda and selective memory.
@crinklecut3790
Ай бұрын
I’m just now figuring out that she is NOT Rosie O’Donnell, although the resemblance is striking.
@Notorious236
Ай бұрын
Her body language is showing so many lying red flags.
@ElisaExplores
Ай бұрын
Agree. Red flags going up!
@raphaellavictoria01
Ай бұрын
And I am convinced her agenda is in cahoots with the prosecutor 's DA) office. The DA wanted a HIGH PROFILE trial, for their own career. It is certainly a godsent to have such a trial, and very sad to have to say goodbye to it bc of a thing such as evidence. Never mind accusing a man and stressing him and his family for months, and possibly convicting him. All that, whatever, this is a career making trial .. or it would have been.
@fanofjohnmellencamp
Ай бұрын
There was a crap show for law enforcement but she followed orders. CTE’s collect thousands of things for this case so them not remembering something from years ago is not surprising. The decision to fill it separately was HUGE (but not her decision). Also the attorney need to not call it a voucher. The judge was right in dismissing with prejudice.
She answers her questions so smug and sure of herself with an attitude. Although,…..Her chest is red with embarrassment
@rogerc23
Ай бұрын
So?
@RcPlayer-tt2vw
Ай бұрын
It means she’s not well liked
@ytsm
Ай бұрын
@rogerc23 *So?!* So she just derailed the trial and gifted Baldwin a mistrial.
@rogerc23
Ай бұрын
@@ytsm No the judge did that. But she’s been trying to do that for months so it was of no surprise.
@kingandgod
Ай бұрын
@@rogerc23 the judge wasn't the one who withheld the evidence, son.
She may be smirking but her demeanor suggests she is about to burst into tears.
@FunkyMonk_96
28 күн бұрын
Yes she was extremely anxious and on the verge of tears.
She is so clearly lying and evasive.
@geroutathat
12 күн бұрын
no, he was entering ideas into the evidence by asking her questions she didnt know the answer to. Lets say you're in the box, and you had a conversation with a stranger, now lying will get you sent straight to jail, so only say yes and no when you are sure, now I ask "Isn't it true he asked you the time of day?" "Didn't you tell him it was a nice day?", you just answer "I dunno", but the jury starts getting ideas. So you and everyone else now think someone came in said to her "Look I have the bullets" and she said "Oh thats amazing I will get them to the lawyers right away, trust me" and then buried them, when her stance might be correct someone came in with some bullets, she documented it, and got on with the day with only making small forgettable talk with the person. When she says "No i didnt say that", she isn't remembering the conversation, she is saying "I have never in my life said that", but she cant be sure she didnt make small talk with the guy and say standard cop stuff to them. Its how an exepnsive lawyer turns a missing label on a book look like a conspiracy against their client. Seriously none of the lawyers questions made any sense at all, and had no evidence value. He just had to sell it as a conspiracy.
Awful witness.
@rbell7666
Ай бұрын
never stopped smirking
@fernandaolivares7926
Ай бұрын
@@rbell7666the perjury charges will erase that smirk for sure 😂
@JimNortonsAlcoholism
Ай бұрын
She's just nervous
@NctsfeAlpha
Ай бұрын
@@JimNortonsAlcoholismshe was rather combative even during the evidentiary hearing outside the presence of the jury
@user-ln9bk7mo3l
Ай бұрын
NOPE.... she's exactly as she should be. The male attorney is poorly skilled in trial procedure and questioning of witnesses (especially for the defense). Knowing how to lay basis for new evidence, and then asking questions that DO NOT get "surprise" answers is something HE is pretty bad at.
That is not ok if it’s true. Everything should be disclosed to defense in order for a fair trial.
@laurenurban3942
Ай бұрын
Tell that to the judge in the Karen Read trial.
@katherinechatham9032
Ай бұрын
I agree completely.
@kingsmitty2043
Ай бұрын
@@laurenurban3942that trial is over. And karen will ride off into the sunset soon
@kenlieberman4215
Ай бұрын
The case was dismissed over it.
@megashedinja9700
Ай бұрын
Man oh MAN do I have news for you!
The fact she has to continually look over to someone to determine what to say is very suspect.
@jonathans.972
Ай бұрын
Exactly. She has been trained and it is gross especially because she works in law enforcement.
@warpedweirdo
Ай бұрын
I haven't been watching the trial so I'm not familiar with the layout of the court room. Are you? If not, wouldn't a simpler, better explanation be that she was looking at the jury when answering, as is common practice?
@whitelobster1ify
Ай бұрын
@@warpedweirdoThat’s exactly what it is.
@jc6087
Ай бұрын
@@starrystarrynight6281 The prosecution were accused of making hand gestures to the witness in the dock... There was a photo they claimed showed it but I never saw it..
The smirking on a case where someone lost their life... reads Liar as well as psychopathic!
She’s getting redder and redder….
@Meowser186
Ай бұрын
I bet you would get pretty red on the stand as well. Not a fun place for most people.
@odysseydiagnostics
Ай бұрын
Most ppl I see only get that red when they’re LYING or if they just got back from running a fkn mile! Ffs the real question is why is she lying? I don’t get it
@tetsuoshima7385
Ай бұрын
@@odysseydiagnosticsNot true
@odysseydiagnostics
Ай бұрын
@@tetsuoshima7385 I don’t believe u. Prove it
@tonyawhitten5199
Ай бұрын
@@odysseydiagnostics I get red if I am having a hot flash, but she is too young for that. lol No doubt she was nervous or angry or both.
There's a lot of ' convenient amnesia ' going on here
@Physics072
Ай бұрын
Does not matter its all a red herring he has almost ZERO to work with his client is guilty. All smoke and mirrors. It worked on you maybe it will work on the Jury. But NM residents are more up on guns that the average state.
@carolinesmercantile4290
Ай бұрын
Because lines of questioning are so awful. The point he tried to make was just blown out of the water by the State. This clip ended too early. The next few minutes/hours are golden!
@xxPageProxx
Ай бұрын
Well she didn't pull the trigger Alec did.
@nickblum1016
Ай бұрын
Except for the withhekd you might have right...lol@@Physics072
@Charlie-lu1jn
Ай бұрын
And the jury will notice.
Wow, someone who is incapable of remembering anything should not be permitted to be a police officer.
Strange how her memory goes when questioned by the defence but not the prosecution
Her memory seemed flawless when Morrissey questioned her. Hmm 🤔
@carma459
Ай бұрын
Too bad they NEVER go to jail for perjury.
@cruisinguy6024
Ай бұрын
Right? Suddenly during cross all of a sudden she doesn’t know / doesn’t recall anything
@Bubba__Sawyer
Ай бұрын
She's not doing any favours for the prosecution or the jury for that matter
@larsvonrinpoche1229
Ай бұрын
Because they go thru the questions before hand. When I was questioned by my lawyer years ago, she told me what would be asked.
@raphaellavictoria01
Ай бұрын
They made a joint decision to try and bury it, im sure. A high profile trial is a godsent for a prosecutor's career. Now they missed out, look at that, how sad, lol.
What’s so funny and why so smug? WOW DESPICABLE !!!
@sherryweems8579
Ай бұрын
DITTO! SMUG faced Alex or Alec Baldwin!
Oh man this woman was sickening…. The smirk and they way she kept looking for approval from prosecutors 🤬🤮
When you're using language like hers, it's obvious to everyone that you're fighting for your life cause you know you did something wrong.
Doesn’t recall things for the defense, but remembers everything for the prosecution. Selective
Whoa... witness is being super sketchy. This is BAD for prosecution
@BlackStump172
Ай бұрын
She is disgusting . I loathe liars .
@lindavergata8207
Ай бұрын
That is Soooo true!!! Very bad in jurors eyes!
@EmitOcean20
Ай бұрын
It means nothing. State law is clear. Can't gun people down. Maybe next trial it will help,but not here.
@markstevens1729
Ай бұрын
Turns out you were very accurate. Case dismissed with prejudice.
This Crime Scene Technician is realizing she's been caught out!
She’s such a snarky witness!😂
How do you remember the shape on a bullet, but not looking for the box of ammunition in the armors room.
She should have worn a turtleneck sweater. Her body gives away her stress in red flushes😏
@bellalugosi5853
Ай бұрын
Put a turtleneck on her and she’s Velma Dinkley
@kitty_cato
Ай бұрын
then she would sweat red and melt away. 😂
@robin3
Ай бұрын
but she doesn't want to look even more like a man. she needs feminine attire.
@waitisthattrue8351
Ай бұрын
I get the same way. A lightweight scarf is more effective since it's less smothering than a turtleneck, and less likely to cause overheating 😅
@TheBeardedAtheist
Ай бұрын
My wife just turns red when talking about the weather. She has Rosacea but the issue if on the stand should be addressed to explain the condition. My wife turns red during any convo for any topic 😂
There should NEVER be live rounds on a movie set.....PERIOD!!!!
I'm surprised this woman is able to work, she doesn't recall anything at all....She should get herself checked out by a professional.....
I don't like this lady's smirk.
@janetmcdonald2572
Ай бұрын
there is a lot of smirking in general
@saylorbay2000
Ай бұрын
It’s egregious and the judge should address her smug look and attitude. She isn’t even hiding the fact that she’s trying to help convict Alec. And who does she keep looking and grinning at? She apparently has the cognitive competency of Biden. She is making everyone associated with LE on this case look shady. I don’t even like Alec but truth is truth and a sloppy case is a sloppy case.
@uschurch
Ай бұрын
Almost as unpleasant as Baldwins smirk.
@sharonrynne2242
Ай бұрын
Isn't she totally smug and indignant? Get real. Hope she isn't purgering herself.
@lesant7659
Ай бұрын
@@uschurchI know right! Girl think that it's not of her concern. She got that " whatever " mentally
Usually law enforcement is much better at lying than this
@eeayquetting5963
Ай бұрын
And here I thought Alec was the worst actor in the room
@Bloodhound_Dogg
Ай бұрын
@@eeayquetting5963 ..thank you!!! someone with some sense!! this has crooked written all over it! The prosecutor did not forget to hand over a box of bullets. They didn't even argue against it really...
@Susanna1953PC
Ай бұрын
😅
@debswatching
Ай бұрын
I know - amateurs!
@userbosco
Ай бұрын
LOL
She hates the word "seek".😂
The more she doesn't recall the redder she gets!
This isn’t a cold case from 20yrs ago. Saying i do not recall every other question is mind boggling.
@whitneymarie4007
Ай бұрын
The witnesses did the same in the Karen Read Case
@Physics072
Ай бұрын
@@whitneymarie4007 Karen read had a case Baldwin has no case.
So random People were Dropping off Rounds at the PD as Evidence ? What ? 😅
@Can-vd3we
Ай бұрын
It was fake evidence from a friend of Hannahs father
@DavidLLambertmobile
Ай бұрын
Seth Kenny, the Rust FFL guy was more deeply involved than some people know. He may not of wanted to harm or kill any crew, actors BUT I think Kenny did want to make Reed, producers look bad. Show the lapses, safety issues on set. OSHA or IATSE 📋 would review the set, complaints at some point. Somehow the .45LC loads got into AB's single action revolver.
@premierpollo
Ай бұрын
If anyone handles evidence before investors, it's not admissible in court.
@Evocati-Augusti
Ай бұрын
NO, somebody he said their name, who was there on set hid the real ammo box the round that killed her came from during the trail, the person handed it off to a family friend during Hannah Gutierrezs trial, who owned the same gun, as every gun collector has this gun, the Sherriffs office had this information and the original box of ammo, and they not only didn't tell the defence team, they hide the whole event from everyone, so at the end of the day , there was a box of real ammo on set...which changes everything.
@RcPlayer-tt2vw
Ай бұрын
And should probably let the kid go too
Those withholding evidence should face prison for perverting the course of justice.
She behaves like a guilty person that is fully aware of their own implicit bias.
HIDING EVIDENCE!
@Rise-UP1969
Ай бұрын
Its clear :)
She is the most incompetent employee and should be terminated. And instead of having some self awareness, showing embarrassment at her incompetence, she sits there smug. "I dont reacall" is all she's got. 😔
@APackOfHungryGhosts
Ай бұрын
She works for the sheriff's department. Cops always say "I don't recall." when on the stand. They've been coached too in court for decades. This isn't anything new.
@jody7214
Ай бұрын
Sounds like anyone, ever that’s been called before congress…I don’t recall, I don’t remember, blah blah blah…
@lilmamalove1623
Ай бұрын
@@jody7214💯
@janeferguson1246
Ай бұрын
THANK YOU ! YOU are the only person in addition to me that sees what is Really going on here!!!!
@laurenurban3942
Ай бұрын
I had to testify in front of a group of lawyers regarding a serious car crash that my friend was in. My friends lawyer told me if I’m asked a question that I am not sure of the answer…. Say that you don’t recall…. And I was to never guess and to be honest if I’m asked a question, such as what type of car a certain person drives. The car was definitely dark blue but im not sure if it was a Toyota or an Acura…. I was to just say I don’t know.
They wanted to win this "big case" and that was it. They didn't care about the law. That woman on the stand was so rabidly cronyish that it was absolutely cringe. She wasn't even trying a little bit to hide her glee at "getting one over" by saying, "heh heh, I dunno? Y u ask dum quesh-chun?" She embarrassed herself horribly, and isn't intelligent enough to realize it. The sheer level of unprofessional mannerisms she displayed, and glee in trying to destroy someone's life and career for giggles, is horrifying.
That smug smirk...as if to say "look how clever my answer was".
Why does she "not recall" so much? Is that a tactic and why use it?
@owenswabi
Ай бұрын
Frustrates the defense. Doesn’t allow them to build on initial questions
@Jellybeans630
Ай бұрын
She doesn’t want to lie under oath because if she says the truth, it’d be pretty clear that they suppressed evidence
@soleknight3212
Ай бұрын
@@owenswabi Leads to dismissal of cases
@pillettadoinswartsh4974
Ай бұрын
Yes, it is a tactic. And it is used to bolster a weak prosecution case, and to avoid perjury charges.
@soleknight3212
Ай бұрын
@@Jellybeans630 Saying 'I don't recall' is one of the worst approaches to use. Look what happened in the Fani case
Can't stand her smug smirking!
@geechis8883
Ай бұрын
Me either 😮really don't like her and I can't stand the blond prosercuter
@lindavergata8207
Ай бұрын
Its like she's so proud of herself
@lindavergata8207
Ай бұрын
I HOPE she reads these comments
@nwicconsultants6640
Ай бұрын
@@lindavergata8207 Even if she does read these comments she undoubtedly will "not recall" reading these comments if she stays in character of the totally useless and lying crime scene tech. Her smug denial of the specifics of the case will only lessen her credibility in the long run. In the short term she simply comes across as pathetic.
@nwicconsultants6640
Ай бұрын
@@Mikeycrescent1952 Which happens to be 14 minutes and 45 seconds longer than her attention span!
“I don’t recall any of the facts in this case that make me look guilty…”.
This Judge did the right thing. I am so relieved that she dismissed this case. Like him or not the Judge has integrity.
That was a lazy investigation by this crime scene investigator imagine how she conducts investigations on other cases.
@hilberryable
Ай бұрын
She is NOT the investigator but the lab technician.
@ColSandersLives
Ай бұрын
You really aren't keeping up...
@tonyawhitten5199
Ай бұрын
She is not a crime scene investigator.
@siksk8r77
Ай бұрын
She's a technician and they called her because she has less information, knows way less, and is easier to discredit. Keep up.
@bordereau1
Ай бұрын
It's been posted over and over....she was a crime scene tech NOT the lead investigator.
Funny how she remembers everything when the prosecutor asks her questions...
@gwilki2
Ай бұрын
Because the prosecutor was asking her questions relevant to her actual duties. Can’t believe how dense this comment section is. This wasn’t a bombshell. This was another red herring.
@Alien_Observer_
Ай бұрын
@@gwilki2 Unfortunately, True Crime attracts a lot of low I.Q. and critical thinking challenged people.
@joshuaDstarks
Ай бұрын
@@gwilki2its always so painful in the comments.
@bordereau1
Ай бұрын
@@gwilki2the defense attorney couldn't differentiate between a valid question from the Prosecutor bc he was making up his own scenario.....his objections were pretty much overruled
@kellyalvarado6533
Ай бұрын
😂😅 She couldn't recall the dates of the previous trial nor the name of the guy who brought the ammunition in. Both things the prosecution asked.
“I don’t recall that” reminds me of a lot of oh I remember but I don’t want you to know I do🙌🏽🤦♂️
Her body language is hilariously transparent 😂
I am retired law-enforcement. He's presenting his questions to the wrong person. She is not a law enforcement officer. She is a crime scene technician and does what she is told to do. This defense attorney needs to be asking the law enforcement officers that directed her work.
@hilberryable
Ай бұрын
Totally agree. Unfair to ask her all those questions as though she is responsible for the investigators job,
@forpeace1580
Ай бұрын
Hopefully, he is leading up to that for later...if not, he is a weak lawyer.
@ChickenJoe12
Ай бұрын
Ex-cop doesn’t equal lawyer.. Most cops don’t even know what the law actually is.. if these questions weren’t proper you don’t think Baldwin’s attorneys would be objecting..?
@user-kn5kl4dr2e
Ай бұрын
I think it's called putting down a foundation.
@S.K.Smith-Green
Ай бұрын
She’s the lead investigator. She should know this crap.
This witness is lying, obfuscating and betraying her mission. Disgusting.
@patricias5122
Ай бұрын
And you know that how?
@SonOfNone
Ай бұрын
@@patricias5122 Look, I came into this thinking AB was at least guilty of recklessness [click/tap my name and see my history], but c'mon. Just watch the video. It's obvious this witness is trying to reframe the question and answer in a less than straightforward manner. Some bs is afoot here
@asmrtinglestop4794
Ай бұрын
Her chest goes normal to a frying red. That's a fact. That is a classic physical symptom of someone embarrassed and lying!!!!!!!!! Yes I am a qualified health professional. If she told the truth the prosecutor she answers to would fire her
@jondra1693
Ай бұрын
@@pennylane8318what about the smirk, rolling of her eyes & side-eyes. The change in attitude between defense & prosecutions line of questioning is glaringly obvious.
@cherylg46
Ай бұрын
And she keeps looking over at the Prosecutors
She should be held in contempt for that smug smirk on her face
Prayers to Ms. Halyna Hutchins and her family. 🙏
Crime scene tech is not telling the complete truth. She is too smug!
They handed Alex a gun " loaded", presumably safe. A loaded gun is loaded. He probably wouldn't known the diff between the amo...he trusted the expert. It was an accident
“ I don’t recall” , the staple of a liar.
Why would they have live lethal ammunition on a movie set or movie production , I think this goes a whole lot deeper than people think!
@JeffreyEpstein-f6y
Ай бұрын
Some of the crew were shooting cans after hours at the set.
@jimmypenrose1401
Ай бұрын
Because the armorer that was hired for the production was an adolescent kid who was irresponsible - as adolescent kids are - and unqualified for the job. She made personal use of the prop weapons and didn't adequately inspect the weapons after she used them; with disastrous results. The notion that Baldwin bore any criminal liability in this situation is a stretch; a pretty BIG one if you understand how a film set works. Especially since Hannah Gutierrez was rightfully convicted of manslaughter. Responsibility for those weapons was HER JOB. It's the only reason she was on the set at all. BUT, as a producer of the film, Baldwin certainly bears civil responsibility for hiring her. He should and probably will be sued by the Hutchins family, I'm sure. The production insurance should cover whatever settlement is reached, though; that's what it's for. It won't come out of his pocket personally.
witness keeps looking at the prosecutor for clues as what to say
I’m so tied of these cops being deceptive.
@deborahoneillmccarthy7032
Ай бұрын
She’s a technician
@LynetteA68
Ай бұрын
You mean straight up liars?? ALL LEO are straight liars!!!
@JeffreyEpstein-f6y
Ай бұрын
@@deborahoneillmccarthy7032 They all work together as one, including the DA as well.
Will she be charged with a crime? A man's freedom was on the line here.
Ladies and gentleman, meet Karen! Alec Baldwins attorney exposed her for what she is.
I knew it! Seth Kennedy and Sarah Zachary provided the live rounds. Why else would Sarah Zachary throw away the ammunition?
@ccjdis
Ай бұрын
Sarah Zachery instantly destroyed evidence.
@poodee9395
Ай бұрын
Kenny should have been arrested
@eatsleepv
Ай бұрын
Wow. Do you know if they took plea deals or got immunity?
@bunnygaffney2765
Ай бұрын
I felt this from the very beginning. They set up Hannah
@bunnygaffney2765
Ай бұрын
@@poodee9395absolutely as should Sarah
This witness is obviously biased. The smug attitude is really irritating. She is in forensics? She can't remember what she had for breakfast, let alone any "work" that she's been involved in during the investigation.
@tonyawhitten5199
Ай бұрын
She is just a tech who appears as though she feels she is being blamed for something. I have been on the stand many many times as an expert witness on drug testing and it is very easy to get emotional if you feel as though you are being blamed for something you had nothing to do with. As she said, she has nothing to do with turning over evidence to the defense. She has a boss and the boss told her what to do with what some man off the street brought in. Witnesses like her are used to having their words be twisted by attorneys and she was on guard. As far as remembering every detail, you have to understand that this is not the only case she is working on. If she does not recall every detail then that is understandable and she said so. It is nerve wracking to be on a stand.
@isaiahlaitinen
Ай бұрын
@@tonyawhitten5199All she had to do was tell the truth.
@cherylann8538
Ай бұрын
So smug! And arrogant. Not a great combination of personality traits. Someone died here!
@brandybiscoff9685
Ай бұрын
She gives strangely contradictory answers at times, too. Never seen a crime scene tech come across this sketchy/questionable.
@cherrywavez99
Ай бұрын
and now we learned she wouldn’t even complete her reports on time. 😅
She knowa exactly what he said. Semantics is not for us a life was lost. One injured.
I absolutely LOVE that the Case was DISMISSED!!!
@user-wc5xt5od9r
Ай бұрын
BS Whole Thing He never meant to hurt anyone
Gosh, law enforcement "buried" evidence that may help the defense. Never seen that before!
@kmjjbj
Ай бұрын
Never happened. (Note the sarcasm)
She's in on the set up.
She smirks. She can’t remember anything that was so relevant to the case.
I would go over ALL of her testimony and question her ability to remember any of it to any accuracy...
She sure doesn't recall very much considering the gravity of the situation and her position as lead investigator regarding the ammo. Seems like incompetence by the sheriff's office.
@jdxx59
Ай бұрын
She was asked and said she is not a detective. She’s not lead investigator.
@chrisgast
Ай бұрын
People have the right to a fair and speedy trial. The trials were not speedy and probably not fair.
@jacobbaran
Ай бұрын
@@chrisgast speedy trial doesn't mean they skip over evidence and arguments, it means they don't sit in jail for ten years waiting for it to start. In this case nobody is sitting in jail and it is the victim's family that has been waiting years.
@hilberryable
Ай бұрын
she is a technician not an investigator.
@Brittanyjustgoes
Ай бұрын
Her smirking doesn’t help either
LIAR witness.
@buckfiden1228
Ай бұрын
Not as much as ALEC Baldwin😂
@Tammy_26Irwin
Ай бұрын
@@buckfiden1228 but he is not on the stand and lying under oath like she is big difference 🤷🏻♀️
@bradrock7731
Ай бұрын
He killed her and he's going to jail like anyone else would . Witness makes no difference. Cut & dry case. Not a tragic accident either. Tragic carelesness all around
@buckfiden1228
Ай бұрын
@@Tammy_26Irwin jails are literally full of people who accidentally shot someone….. what world are you living in?
@Tammy_26Irwin
Ай бұрын
@@buckfiden1228 the majority of them pulled a gun and meant to kill that person
She keeps looking at someone and smirking.
She is so smug with her answers as she looks at the prosecutors …lack of memory should require her to quit her job now …outrageous !
*Her smug look frustrates me. She has the “This is my time to shine” demeanor. I pray the jury sees through this Smh…*
@susanshew2373
Ай бұрын
I agree.
@SpicyTexan64
Ай бұрын
Kinda like you had to put your comment in bold face
@lovelight1114
Ай бұрын
@@SpicyTexan64I love you 😂
@leslieacoca5876
Ай бұрын
she is vile. "I do not not recall that I am sitting here".
@HappyGrouch
Ай бұрын
@@SpicyTexan64*How am I supposed to take it off? My font is the same every time I type. Its not a hack hahaha*
Acting clueless when the defense cross examines you just shows the bias in this case. Everybody wants to get a promotion trying to help the state get the big win 🤦♂️ that's the red flustered face of a liar
@goatgal7884
Ай бұрын
She's only a technician, for pete sake, lol.She is NOT the detective on the case.The guy who turned in the bullets, wanted to changed the direction of the case, to accuse someone else....she was NOT aware of this.
@doloreschansey9556
Ай бұрын
Glad you're not a detective. you would get fired on day one.
@ns2110theonly
Ай бұрын
@@doloreschansey9556 oh look the girlfriends in the house😂😂
@cbean0017
Ай бұрын
Boom.💯
@jamaldee2355
Ай бұрын
Preach!!!!!!!
She can't recall if they were live rnds? She's lying. As the lawyer said, they buried it. Wow.
She doesn’t recall anything. How convenient‼️
So does that mean they were hiding evidence or are hiding?
@wolke1955
Ай бұрын
Guess so.
@Paralleljen93
Ай бұрын
No a third party brought in ammo years later no way to definitely say it came from the set
@Zion66666
Ай бұрын
@@Paralleljen93but they should have investigated it AND informed the defence
@banbeocca9451
Ай бұрын
Yes, state withhold potential evidence from the defense. Ammo pertaining to the case was brought to the authorities.
@Naturist_222
Ай бұрын
Yup state being lazy and not wanting to deal with this “new evidence” cost them the trial!
This woman is clearly shady.
What is a live gun doing at a movieset anyway???
Lady was already coached by the prosecution how to answer certain questions, the best answer is always I do not recall
This Investigator is infuriating.
@ccjdis
Ай бұрын
Smug.
@BlackStump172
Ай бұрын
@@ccjdisI just noticed that nasty smirk . She will not be impressing the jury .
@hilberryable
Ай бұрын
THIS IS NOT THE INVESTIGATOR. SHE IS A TECHNICIAN. Infuriating that your facts correct.
@pillettadoinswartsh4974
Ай бұрын
Didn't you hear? She's NOT an investigator. She's a lowly CST. She just does what she's told. ::cough:: ::cough::
“I don’t know, I don’t recall.” Didn’t write a report, didn’t interview anyone, didn’t take a statement. What did she do?
@kitty_cato
Ай бұрын
Maybe she works for the Mafia and not for the police😂 Every suspect is happy about such an investigator
@barbarascott3945
Ай бұрын
Love it I love her she is getting him so mad
@TheLyuen
Ай бұрын
@@barbarascott3945 and all these people commenting ! bahaha
@GlamGam1964
Ай бұрын
None of those things are her responsibility. She collects physical evidence and tests it.
@hilberryable
Ай бұрын
She did not have to interview people. She is a lab technician, NOT the investigator. She did write a report which went to her superiors.
Sheriff's office seems to have had an agenda 😮
You have to wonder what other shenanigans the DA's office was involved in in the other trials with the Rust case.
Why’s NM going after Alec Baldwin? Everyone involved and others in the industry have said that actors have no responsibility whatsoever over weapons and arming those weapons. The judge in the armer’s trial told the armer that she alone was responsible for the death of the poor woman. So WTF is going on here?
@GerdaPeterson
Ай бұрын
My feelings exactly
@mocast0974
Ай бұрын
New Mexicans trying to be more important than they are. Small town mentality.
@EmitOcean20
Ай бұрын
Feelings and emotions isn't grounds to ignore state law. R u paid to pretend not to know state law? Hundreds of videos on NM state law bc this trial and you clowns choose to not watch any of them. Why.
@ScarletBrimstone
Ай бұрын
Alec Baldwin wasn't just the actor in the movie, he was the director. That means he's responsible for EVERYTHING on set.
@janeferguson1246
Ай бұрын
The SCREENACTORS rules gave NOTHING to do with the LAW! Helloooo?!!
If you think you're having a bad day at work. There are few 9 minutes that could ever feel longer.
She doesn't know where the rounds are, but magically produces them when compelled by the judge before the case was dismissed. Perjury
What does this witness recall?
@LauraOC714
Ай бұрын
Did you do your job at all??? “I don’t recall” ugh she irritates me
@dr-fd8zn
Ай бұрын
Whatever the prosecutor wants her to.
@leslieacoca5876
Ай бұрын
Not her name.
@collette6103
Ай бұрын
That she buried the evidence ! OMg unreal.
@Jte336
Ай бұрын
How to obfuscate
Some dude shows up randomly, says " I've got the ammo that did such and such" and they are to take it as true and should put that into evidence? Would someone more educated fill me in onto why?
@DavidLLambertmobile
Ай бұрын
This Troy guy seems like he's trying to stage the case against Seth Kenny & deflect blame away from Reed. Kenny was not some 🌹 in this tragic incident. I think Seth Kenny conspired with others on the Rust crew to create a unsafe set, working conditions to support industry complaints, 📑 grievances. It sounds trite & petty but the film, TV business is full of scummy 🐍. Scams...
@leward7788
Ай бұрын
your last line should be a/my bumper sticker. I'm intelligent enough (I have receipts) but not educated on every topic (who could be!) and I wish somebody could explain thins to me. "google it" my butt
@markgado8782
Ай бұрын
They shouldn't. They were sent to be tested and found to be completely different. The "Testor" fellow that brought them in probably committed a crime by providing false evidence..
@siksk8r77
Ай бұрын
THANK YOUUUU! Reed’s family friend brought in the evidence after her trial. Years after the shooting. The only bombshell is that these ppl will stop at nothing to escape accountability.
@Mr_Rob_otto
Ай бұрын
It’s still “evidence” and should have been disclosed to the defense. Why take the police’s word on it? Defense couldn’t do their own testing. It makes the police look biased or incompetent at worse.
This was deliberate. Really bad.
this needs to be investigated big time... all of these ppl involved with the prosecution of this case need to be analyzed for criminal wrongdoing and they need to be suspended without pay immediately until the investigation is completed.