Don't be discouraged by the sound level at start, it's much better after ~2min.

@Deipnosophist_the_Gastronomer

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

@dangerdackel

Жыл бұрын

Still can’t get it right

@AraCarrano

Жыл бұрын

Topic for RI: LUFS , Loudness Units relative to Full Scale.

@TheLoudestOfSilences

Жыл бұрын

Bless you lol kept me on a video I was super excited for

@Knud451

Жыл бұрын

I can assure you I realised that as I had turned the volume up quite high 🤣

Outstanding talk, my favorite so far. This has huge implications to me. Please invite Alexandra Olaya-Castro again when she has new developments!

Most interesting talk on this subject area that I have ever heard. I do hope to hear more fromAlexandra Olaya-Castro in the future!

The beauty of these components at the molecular level is amazing. The photon antenna in particular is astonishing.

Could have normalized the audio before uploading to save our speakers.

Fascinating talk. Thank you very much.

Fantastic presentation

Great lecture. Can't wait for Quantam Physiology :D

Amazingly cool talk. I wouldn't be surprised at all if a chaotic critical point in the relationship between separated parts of the chemical structure facilitates energy capture and transfer.

Congratulations to you and your lab team!

Absolutely brilliant lecture!

@alfredadler3328

Жыл бұрын

i hear almost nothing, to quit

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

Жыл бұрын

@@alfredadler3328 If you have 2 minutes of patience then the volume doubles

Andrija Puharich would be thrilled by this talk. thanks

THANK YOU...!!!

Me and my wife have entailed into research, your work inspire us greatly. Thanks.

@dupont7945

Жыл бұрын

The video was just uploaded, how could you make comment 5 days earlier?

@NoNTr1v1aL

Жыл бұрын

They're obviously a time traveller.

@dupont7945

Жыл бұрын

@@NoNTr1v1aL Are you seriously kidding me?🤣

@LarsRyeJeppesen

Жыл бұрын

@@dupont7945 /r/woooosh

So, photosynthesis is only possible because of quantum mechanical effects. This is mind blowing. Inanimate material on Earth 3.8 billion years ago evolved to create life incorporating quantum mechanical processes. So is it possible that consciousness is also a consequence of a quantum mechanical effect?

Topic for RI: LUFS, Loudness Units relative to Full Scale.

Thank you! Best part from 39:00 onward.

Explain the "co-operation" process of these Nana scale quantum entities during chemical photosynthesis. Easy to say.

Very inspiring 👏

How could we benefit from a confluence of biomimicry and quantum biology? Any ideas?

@vblaas246

Жыл бұрын

Directed evolution in presence of different chromophore molecules, for living solar cells or something. The last slide shows chromophore materials too.

How difficult is it to reproduce these results synthetically? Is it plausible that such processes can also occur elsewhere in the universe? What does this say about the origin of life? Thank you, what a great historical presentation. Immediately raises a lot of follow-up questions. Fantastic!

@Tacit_Tern

Жыл бұрын

Are you referring to biomimicry at a production level?

@bad1970muts

Жыл бұрын

Yes, I am particularly curious about the probability that these processes can also arise elsewhere somewhere in the universe.

@RalfStephan

Жыл бұрын

@@bad1970muts You would need life in that place on a similar (carbon) basis as ours, with its vast productivity and coverage of chemical space.

Great talk but better change the slide at 13:26, these wheels won't turn like that.

Logic gate shift with chemical structure tension. Neg pressure Positive pressure Resonate switching? Chirality ?

Wondering if the dual proprieties of light could provide additional insights? Light exhibits dual properties of wave and photon. As a wave, light exhibits properties like reflection, refraction, and interference, while as a photon, it has a discrete energy and behaves as a particle. This duality was explained by quantum mechanics. The wave-like properties of light follow the laws of Maxwell's equations, while the particle-like properties follow the principles of quantum mechanics.

The audio is coming through really quiet for me. Could you reupload a bit louder?

@tjwoosta

Жыл бұрын

Its really quiet for about 2 minutes then it suddenly gets loud.

13:19 Maybe on the quantum level gears can turn like that... but on the human scale I have never seem them behave that way.

@vblaas246

Жыл бұрын

"3 gears are possible" - Numberphile

I am very interested in this subject but found the talk difficult to listen to. I wish she would have spent more time explaining the items in a slide before talking about the whole slide. Also, way too much introduction. The first 25 min could be eliminated. It would have been better to start right off with an example quantum event.

Well, I can't hear this at all. Before uploading, try taking your video, and porting it to a completely different platform/device and seeing if the audio comes out correct. Yes I know often the audio does not always work perfectly, but a instructor who can not be heard clearly is passing no information on to anyone.

@luciususiholo6956

Жыл бұрын

It gets better after 2mins

Audio normalization killed by intro clip.

Wow

👏👏👏👏👏

First slide, picture of Earth 4.8 billion years ago showing today's continents, huh?

If I'm allowed to do nitpicking, I would like them (quantum 'big things' researchers) to specify what exactly they mean by "quantum processes". Are they processes that CAN be explained in the framework of quantum mechanics, or that CANNOT be explained in the framework of classical mechanics? I think only the latter definition is suitable for the term "quantum processes". For instance, pendulum isochronism can be explained in the framework of quantum mechanics, but nobody calls it a quantum process. As far as this video is concerned, I'm not fully convinced that the shift has something to do with the quantum in the above sense. The shift due to an additional interaction can occur in purely classical systems as well. Due to an additional interaction, of course, the energy transfer rate would naturally change. If the increment occurs only in the framework of quantum mechanics or is more significant there, that would be interesting.

Audio is too low

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

Жыл бұрын

not if you listen for 2 minutes then it doubles in volume.

Surrey is the best for this.

AUDIO TOO CAN'T Hear it.

@lmaolmaolmaolmao1234

Жыл бұрын

Give it' a Moment, the AUDIO greatly improves after just about 2-min. in.

Well done, if you can measure 90% photon energy transfer to photosynthesis material, you have cracked the code and relatively free energy solar cells are next. Thankyou.

@thstroyur

Жыл бұрын

The high efficiency of photosynthesis has been known for a while. Between her thick accent and aloof communication, I didn't get why these results are supposed to be a big deal. The big thing seems to be that vibronic coupling facilitates electron transfer, but even that isn't too surprising if we remember BCS superconductivity happens due to phononic coupling. I may be completely wrong in my assessment, but this looks and feels like a nothing sandwich - much like many a colloquium I attended back in uni.

@buendodo

Жыл бұрын

​@thstroyur ​​​how many languages do you speak fluently? she speaks at least two. Can you give an s peech in a foreign language without a thick accent?

@thstroyur

Жыл бұрын

@@buendodo Your whataboutism does not deflect from the validity of my comment; accents per se aren't a problem - but they become one if they render the speaker unintelligible, or otherwise hinder listening - and it's fair game criticizing that. Bearing on my college days, one experiences the full spectrum during one's course; not fun trying to learn something difficult, while at the same time struggling to decipher whatever the person is even saying.

We haven’t figured QM, and we’re talking about it’s connection to the complex field of biology?

@vblaas246

Жыл бұрын

Yes, ~gangnam~ Car-Parinello style

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

Жыл бұрын

study quantum physics Professor Basil J. Hiley - he figured it out.

@iteerrex8166

Жыл бұрын

@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 Unless he has a new model.. Due to its fundamental flaws, there’s no figuring this one, nor is it fixable.

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

Жыл бұрын

@@iteerrex8166 So you don't want to just search his name? hahaha. "Learning how to learn" is the most important step. Hiley relies on noncommutativity. thanks

@iteerrex8166

Жыл бұрын

@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 I may, thanks :)

QM is fundamental. And if we can control this without the use of things like The Large Hadron Collider, we could probably direct energy however we like. On a DNA-level it would mean that we could design cells to cure many diseases, and much more. Thanks for this. Maybe one of the most interesting findings now when we seem to be stuck in theories impossible to experimentally verify.

@adnon2604

7 ай бұрын

You can cure diseased cells without QM. Almost no medical technicians are quantum experts.

@cspreach1963

6 ай бұрын

That’s literally the mRNA vaccines. It uses nanotech lipid particles. It’s literally littered through every US Patent and Contract regarding the Covid-19 vaccines.

Sea alge tu ular green comly with it. They produces noice at nayarambalam kerala a shrimp farm

Shout out to my hero Jim al Khalili for bringing this stuff into public consciousness over a decade ago

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

Жыл бұрын

actually JohnJoe McFadden was before him - around 2006. Also Dr. Mae-Wan Ho - her book, "Rainbow and the Worm"

Jumpscare at 2:03

So is that I doubt it good¥ right to soon ha ha ha ha.\°

2:00 attention grabbing

@nateshrager512

Жыл бұрын

Haha when the audio comes in proper

what?

She sounds kinda nervous (her breathing). And she takes too much time off-topic. Also her explanations don't feel like they're supposed to be understood by laymen.

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

Жыл бұрын

it's basically speaking another language to not use the mathematics, etc. Science is based on the language of mathematics.

AOC?

@georgesos

Жыл бұрын

😀...not that one.

Photosynthesis also relies on CO2. The very thing some -rich- people want to reduce to zero from humans, cattle and other sources. Too little CO2 will lead to plant deaths and plant deaths lead to a reduction in oxygen, a reduction of oxygen will lead to the death of mammals and other life dependent on it. To 'fight' high CO2 levels best would be to plant more trees, not to stop us or any other forms of life from producing it.

@skitzo23

Жыл бұрын

Plants release CO2 by cellular respiration and after they die. You can't sustainably offset CO2 through planting trees while still using up fossil fuels. That is a scientific fact. Also, there will never be 'too little' CO2 just because humans stop burning former organic matter. Life (photosynthetic) on earth managed with all the CO2 available for almost 4bn years. I think it can manage without us burning fossil fuels. And even if CO2 levels got critically low (I felt dumber just typing that), what is stopping humanity to restart burning things at any point? Anthropogenic climate change is real, get over it.

@rolf-joachimschroder917

Жыл бұрын

I'm sorry that's way too simple thought, nature is unfortunately way too complex for it to simply be enough to plant any trees, which usually die when we have too much CO2 in the air and it gets too hot and dry

@FuburLuck

Жыл бұрын

Exactly WHO are you claiming wants to reduce CO2 emissions to zero from all sources? Answer: No one. That's a straw-man argument. People worried about climate change want to REDUCE CO2 emissions, not zero them out.

@nateshrager512

Жыл бұрын

You realize it's impossible to reduce to zero our co2 emissions? They want net zero which is very different from what you are implying. But yes conserving forests (especially rainforests and mosses) is definitely a good thing. But we are also producing wayy too much co2 per person

@FuburLuck

Жыл бұрын

@Nate Shrager All the sane replies to this guy keep disappearing. I think he's reporting all replies as spam or something to hide them. Anyone that calls him on his false argument gets zapped. No one is calling for zero CO2 emissions, but for reduced emissions. Any comments that give a reality check to his strawman argument gets hidden.

1.04 Tiny Brussels sprouts??

In Nature everyting is connected to everything else,,,

Wow the proteins fold and act like quantum antennas and use it to power the molecular machinery, just the sheer amount of nanotechnology and unity is mind blowing. That amount of symmetry proves to me there is a Grand Unifying force, God whatever you want to call it, Theory of Everything Buddha Krishna etc. Each Cubit is full of consciousness, contains the whole of the parts like a fractal hologram film that could be in any state all at the same time.