I have always LOVED the way Dr. Wise LOVES his WORK! HIS excitement is transferred to the viewer, and instills that excitement in the rest of us! I never get tired of watching him and learning from him! Thank you Dr. Wise, and God Bless you!

@mackjones8934

2 жыл бұрын

His enthusiasm is so awesome

@ghostindahouse2247

2 жыл бұрын

@@mackjones8934 I'm not here for enthusiasm.... I'm looking for answers.... and got very few. The search continues I fear.

@mackjones8934

2 жыл бұрын

@@ghostindahouse2247 well keep thinking you spontaneously evolved from an amoeba then. 😃

@knightclan4

2 жыл бұрын

@@ghostindahouse2247 The most compelling evidence I found for a single catastrophic global flood and rapid plate tectonics is folded mountains. The physics of bending sedimentary rock layers without breaking at the folds and the lack of metamorphosis really is quite compelling. Secular scientists call it an anomaly. I call it evidence for the global flood referred to in Genesis.

@freemind..

2 жыл бұрын

@@knightclan4 - Great call! There is no way to defend the uniformitarian dogma to explain folded strata. No mechanism exists in secular geology that can bend multiple distinct layers of stone without corrupting their crystalline structure and characteristics. The only reasonable explanation is rapid deposition under several kilometers of water, coupled with seismic activity unlike anything ever witnessed, culminating in simultaneous lithification. In short.. During the Global Flood.

I like this guy. You're a good teacher! Brilliant presentation. Excellent! Thank you!

@johnchristianpreus

2 жыл бұрын

Good hearty humor!

Agree with those who applaud your enthusiasm to non-geologists, including me. Am forever grateful !

@appaloosa42

3 ай бұрын

He exceeds ‘enthusiasm’ proceeding to JOY! I LOVE listening to him! In the same class as Chuck Missler!

I love seeing the geological evidence for Noah's flood, it's very interesting

@colinthomson5358

Жыл бұрын

If they brought Catastrophism into Geology think how it would grab childrens attention. They don't even have to give up their uniformitarianism theory just admit that every so often there are periods of Catastrophism. We need both ways to explain what we see. And my God the evidence for global floods or ice ages is so much more interesting especially because there is so much we can't explain! An Iceage happens because of Milankovitch cycles? Hmmm nice theory but it would explain a change of a few degrees at most... nowhere near enough to explain the iceage - neither the start or the end!

The mega-sequences explains it all, and each megasequences tells a story worth "listening" to. This might be the first step in understanding what came about, just few thousands years ago, and this is the brick missing to understand what all this means. It's breathtaking and fascinating, and thank you for listening too.

As always an outstanding presentation from Dr. Wise! I must confess, though, about 10 minutes in I had a strong urge to make a creationist drinking game: take a swig of my coffee every time he says 'lithostratographic column'. 😆

@paxvobiscum9859

2 жыл бұрын

You must have gone through 20 cups of coffee! 😆 Love Dr Wise. What a blessing he is!

@Blitzkrieg137

Жыл бұрын

I’m guessing that you are in your 30’s because of your comment

@KevinB-pd3me

9 ай бұрын

​​@Blitzkrieg137 I was guessing pre-teen. But they seemed to have watched at least enough to pick up one key idea.

An old earth explanation views these distinct layers as evidence of long periods under which different conditions prevailed on the planet. The young earth view is that these layers are evidence of relatively quick processes prevailing during a global flood. Taking the two views on their face, the flood explanation seems to fit the global uniformity of these strata much better than the old earth view. Given how conditions we can observe today lay down sediments in various places, it seems a bit odd to think that these strata would be so uniform across the earth if their formation took many millions of years. Unless one wants to postulate regional floods over ages and ages that just so happened to cover the earth in such a way as to create this global uniformity (which I do not think is something anyone has or would propose) then one is forced to think the uniformity was from a global event, and less likely from a series of events over long periods of time occurring in various locations to the point of the observed uniformity. As for the abundant existence of fossils in these layers, there is some places were the old earth view seems to fit the evidence as well (if not slightly better) than the flood explanation. But even here I have to admit that uniformity of these fossil beds is better explained by a global event in which conditions were fairly uniform worldwide. Fossils are formed under very particular conditions. To think these uniformities and large nature of fossil beds were created in sequence globally over eons of time is a stretch. The caveat for the old earth view is that the layering of these fossil beds matches (to a certain extent) evolutionary expectations among the various classifications of the animal kingdom. Yet this matching of expectations is not without its problems. Given the old earth explanation, the fossil record would seem to indicate long periods of time in which global conditions were fairly uniform and animals arose and died without much in the way of transitions between them, nor much in the way of transitions between later layers. It would be a story of abrupt starts and stops with long periods of stasis in between. I find that to be as much a miracle as the story of Noah and the flood.

@waywardspirit7898

2 жыл бұрын

Stop it. Your being logical again. :)

@remainhumble6432

2 жыл бұрын

@@waywardspirit7898 Yep, using your brain is becoming a luxury you cannot afford in modern science.

@JosiahFickinger

2 жыл бұрын

I think Christian Old Earth believers could say God created the layers like this, but that's just speculation.

@craftypotato4527

Жыл бұрын

@@JosiahFickinger I would disagree because death came into the world only after Adam sinned, before that there was no death, so to say God put the earth under millions of years of death and evolution up until the Garden doesn't fit the Genesis narrative.

@JosiahFickinger

Жыл бұрын

@@craftypotato4527 I'm not holding to the old earth position I'm merely just giving them this tip. I very much hold to the view you mentioned

I applaud the person who made the subtitles and used video chapters. IT HELPS ME SO MUCH

I'm an 1984 alumni of Carson Newman college. I enjoyed a Geology class I took. I brought home rocks form the limestone out crop. One lesson from the class, rocks tell the truth. Thanks for the video.

@tracyavent-costanza346

8 ай бұрын

great, then explain how the strata in grand canyon got there in just 6000 years.

@appaloosa42

3 ай бұрын

@@tracyavent-costanza346 not 6000, * ONE* year.

@tracyavent-costanza346

3 ай бұрын

@@appaloosa42 great, so your version of god is a least a huge practicaly joker if not an outright liar. my standards for gods are higher than that. please notify yours that he/she/they are disqualified.

@appaloosa42

3 ай бұрын

@@tracyavent-costanza346 your comment makes nonsense

@tracyavent-costanza346

3 ай бұрын

@@appaloosa42 I did not expect in your case it would, so don't trouble yourself. and please stop voting. other people actually hold them selves accountable for their own decisions.

I know I never once thought of looking at a lithostratographic column as a child. Love your work sir

Thank you, Dr. Wise. We are Tennesseans and have noticed those rock differences from East to West Tennessee. Nice to have someone to finally teach us why those differences exist. We've always looked at the layers and formations as Flood evidence, such as the giant run-off riverbed we call The Delta, but have had no teacher good enough until now to explain a lot of what we've seen.

@katkit4281

3 жыл бұрын

Sorry but the global flood does not explain how the strata layers are sorted by types of rocks. In floods we see sedimentary layers seperated by granular size not by type of rock. The largest sediments get deposited first with the smallest getting deposited last. Floods do not sort out sediments by type of rock like we see in the strata layers. This is something I notice every creationist ignores like this video did. In the end the fact that the strata layers are separated by types of rocks disproves any notion of a global flood.

@Draezeth

2 жыл бұрын

@@katkit4281 Hey, sorry for the late response, but I have a question. Would the type of rock not affect the size of the particles? And why *do* layers end up separated by type of rock? Where do the different types come from, and why is it different from age to age?

@gaz1tinsley

2 жыл бұрын

What is Raks .....?

@wesleycolemanmusic

2 жыл бұрын

@@katkit4281 If someone hasn't already directed you to Dr. Andrew Snelling's book "Earth's Catastrophic Past" -- it goes through how how hydrodynamic selection of moving water affects the locations of sediments and fossils. That's the best I can do. If you buy it and are not convinced, that's fair enough. At least, do yourself the service of understanding the high-level arguments before making blanket declarations such as you have.

@wesleycolemanmusic

2 жыл бұрын

@@katkit4281 Also, I'm assuming you have an answer to Stubadub's questions by now? Hmm?

It would be pretty cool for your job to be roaming around researching and seeing so much of the planet. Normally if I am driving somewhere its to a destination and then right back and few days later.

I appreciate the scholarship. I’ve listened to amateurs on other videos who offhandedly make the Bible out to be just myth. Many of those people do not present credentials or references. To the listener: exam the presenter and whether he’s done his research and if professional. Wise at least has put in the work to have earned a hearing.

@jeffduggan387

2 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen5961 Everything he says makes perfect sense. The evolutionists are the ones making ridiculous claims.

@randyg.7940

2 жыл бұрын

@@jeffduggan387 SMA!!!!

@stevieh9860

2 жыл бұрын

The Bible isn’t just myth. Genesis certainly is though.

@garymalcomb2882

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, but, his reasoning is, biased. So, that put's it. A tad of the true mark. Actually, this article disproves. The validity of the Biblical version of true reality. 🌠🎆 🌧🌨 ☔ 🎓 🚬🗿

@garymalcomb2882

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, but, his reasoning is, biased. So, that put's it. A tad of the true mark. Actually, this article disproves. The validity of the Biblical version of true reality. 🌠🎆 🌧🌨 ☔ 🎓 🚬🗿

33:30 giant current ripples...like in Missoula , Montana? The amount and force of water must have been awesome 😲

I appreciate that you allow comments to be made. I notice that Answers in Genesis have their comments turned off. I do not think that is very wise of them.

@donniev8181

2 жыл бұрын

There's only so much blasphemy a Christian can take.

@stevieh9860

2 жыл бұрын

Nothing says I can defend my position quite like “ comments are turned off” If you are the sort of person that considers anything you don’t like to be blasphemy, you are lost, there is nothing I can do. You won’t defend your position, because you don’t want to. And because you can’t.Donnie V, try anyway. I won’t be rude.

@VaxtorT

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevieh9860 well, the maker of this video defends his position quite well I would say.....unless you are totally blind to the Truth.

@stevieh9860

2 жыл бұрын

@@VaxtorT the position in question is describing any challenge to your “ truth “ as blasphemy. I’d like to see anyone defend that.

@VaxtorT

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevieh9860 Well, I am not such a person. I will defend the Word of God with the Word of God....and science...as He is the Author of both. My Faith is not a blind Faith.

This was a fascinating lecture. Kurt answered a number of long-standing questions I have had about the rock layers I've informally studied in Grand Canyon and around the world.

Dr. Wise's presentation also dissolves 'evolution time' which began with Steno in the 17th c. Evolution theory has been relying on Steno's superposition to calculate time, but modern sedimentology shows the strata are not isochronous for the fossil record, rather the stratified layers are isochronous.

@cosmictreason2242

Жыл бұрын

Can you explain that last sentence?

@jmmanley

Ай бұрын

What he means is that layers of sediment are laid down at the same time, in the same event, and not very slowly, one layer at a time. Evolutionary theory says the each layer was laid down over a long period of time, and then the next layer was laid on top of it over another long period of time, and so on. The whole “stack” of layers is thus believed to represent very long periods of time. I believe that modern sedimentology recognizes that multiple layers get laid down simultaneously as the varies kinds of matter in the water settle out at different rates. This causes the appearance of layers of sediment.

When I was in school I wanted to major in geology..wound up dropping out before could take more than one class. This presentation is awesome. Really makes me want to go back!

“...we have a history of the earth that’s linear in nature. It’s not cyclical...” (23:15) Interesting detail. Very good lecture.

@Kraflyn

4 жыл бұрын

but why are there 5 very similar megasequences one on top of each other, then?

@generalleigh7387

4 жыл бұрын

Kraflyn Nothing is perfect because of unpredictable variables but the overall is consistent.

@dat2ra

4 жыл бұрын

So? The planet has evolved, the atmosphere developed, the oceans' chemistry evolved, the crust changed through time. Why would you expect all the rocks to be cyclic, although many sequences are.

@AndrewGulickTrueVitalityPlus

4 жыл бұрын

dat2ra There’s no scientific repeatable experiment that proves that anything evolved, including the atmosphere. The Bible says that God took 6 days to create everything made. Now, that can’t be scientifically proven either. But He gives enough evidence that no one has to believe by blind faith.

@AndrewGulickTrueVitalityPlus

4 жыл бұрын

@James Was Here : If you don't think that believing in something, when there is no scientific proof of it, isn't Blind Faith, then you are lying to yourself. Except for when God Himself intervenes, and performs a miraculous event, nothing said in the Bible contradicts science. But rather, what we do know about science points very strongly towards a creator that, created everything and put life in the only habitable place in the universe. The cell is so complex that it is an impossibility that it could have formed on it's own. Any part of a cell not in place, and there is no life in the cell. In fact, what is life? Why does a cell have life in the first place? All of the parts of a cell being in place doesn't give it life. Scientists have constructed cells and tried to give it a small micro jolt of electricity to try to give it life, and it doesn't come to life. So, it's not the parts of a cell that give it life, nor can they give life to it by micro volts of elelctricity. What is life and why doesn't a constructed cell come to life when all of it's constituent parts are there? If scientists can construct a cell and not able to jolt it into living, how could it have happen by blind chance? The chances of life just coming about is much greater than the number of atoms in the universe. It's an impossibility! Did you know that if the earth were just a little closer to the sun, that it would be too hot to sustain life, and we would burn up and die. If the earth were just a short distance farther from the sun, then the earth would be too cold to sustain life and we all die. We are also, located in a small pocket in the Milky-way Galaxy that is not hazardous to life. It is the only place in the entire galaxy that has this small pocket of non hazardous gases. If our so finely tuned Solar System were located just a small distance outside of that small area in our vast galaxy, life could not exist, even with the earth at the same distance form the sun. And, there are many scientific constants that, if they were not inside of the tolerances they are in, again life could not exist. ... And, you say that I'm the one with blind faith and that I am the one that is a fool? God says in the Bible that He will PROVE HIMSELF by showing that He knows the future and by making predictions, concerning the future, before they happen, just to show to mankind who He is. One of these concerns a well known historical figure of Alexander the Great. Also, Jesus birth, lineage, death, and resurrection was all predicted and came to pass exactly as predicted hundreds of years prior. Even if Jesus tried to make some of these predictions come true by planning, there were many predictions that were out of anyone's control, especially the ones concerning His death and resurrection. This has happened time and time again throughout the Bible. In fact there is no other religious book in the world that proves itself the way that the Bible has done, down through history. In fact, every time that there is an archeological find that matches what the Bible says, is a scientific proof of the Bible. Now, not every archeological find has anything to do with the Bible, but, when there is, it ALWAYS shows that the Bible was right. Not once has an archaeological find proven the Bible wrong but rather, has shown us that what man has thought was wrong. Again, no other historical book or any other book written by man is so accurate. To not believe is to go against logic. To believe in evolution is not scientific, but rather a belief. It takes more blind faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in God.

This I believe every bit of this show.

Really appreciate the clarity of explanation provided by Dr. Wise. Fascinating topic!

@peteconrad2077

4 жыл бұрын

Shame it’s all a mass of lies.

@waywardspirit7898

2 жыл бұрын

@@peteconrad2077 Exactly. Why anyone could believe that they came from an ameba is strait up rediculas. Our complexity proves otherwise. It's all lies. Agreed.

@peteconrad2077

2 жыл бұрын

@@waywardspirit7898 how does our complexity prove otherwise?

@waywardspirit7898

2 жыл бұрын

@@peteconrad2077 There isn't enough time or space to list the amount of complexities contained with the human body. One quick example is our vision. There are billions of receptors that must work in perfect harmony in order for us to see. This includes, the eye itself, blood flow, the eye lid, the tears and the brain that can convert the electrical/light energy the eye takes in to covert to an image. Then the question becomes what came 1xst. the brain, the eye. the blood flow to the eye, the tears, etc, etc? As I said, there simply isn't enough space to write it all down. What came 1st ? the Heart or the blood? The stomach or the teeth? On and on and on. All these things must happen at the same time because one cannot function before the other and evolving over millions of years is simply 100% absolutely impossible.The human body came into existence as an intelligently designed species functioning perfectly on day 1. It might take a PHD in genetics and physiology to explain all these things (which I do not have) but any Joe Blow on the street (like me) can see it IF THEY SIMPLY LOOK. (with the amazing and super complex - "minds eye"). God Bless. :)

@peteconrad2077

2 жыл бұрын

@@waywardspirit7898 it’s utter nonsense to claim that these must all have come about simulcast we can’t survive without any one. Just because we can’t, it doesn’t mean our ancestors couldn’t. We once had an ancestor who lived without teeth and they preyed on things they did not have to chew. We had another ancestor who had no ears but was worse off for it as he was preyed upon by not hearing danger. These features developed in our primitive ancestors and we now find them essential he uses we have evolved to live in an an environment that requires them...because that’s what we have.

It Was Really Interesting Traveling Around The Breadbasket Of America And Seeing The Layers Of Exposed Rocks At Different Ground Level Elevations. One Could Look At The Types Of Rock And Track Similar Elevations, Formations, And Exposures, Even Over Long Distances.

Wow, this is mind blowing and edifying!

Excellent video, I learned a lot.

@sodaht2296

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine what you would learn from a credible geologist...

2016 New Zealand The Papatea Fault line supposedly shifted at a rate of 3000m per second leaving fish and coral exposed in a raised ridge of over 1.5m

I found a crinoid, last summer, while digging a garden. When I broke this piece of sandstone a puff of yellow dust fell out, then the fossil was revealed. My thinking is...How did these guts , of some kind..?? ..survive millions of years. ? I am happy to hear you say , our timeline is wrong.

I enjoy and appreciate the videos Dr Wise produces. I studied geology as a second major back in the 80s. I knew back then that the “billions of years” and “incremental change” was questionable. I’ve never stopped.studying and testing flood geology. This is good stuff.

Just a Christian geology geek loving a geology teacher who geeks out as much.

This was very well done and I will definitely subscribe

Scientifically presented research. Thank you for this objective and thoughtful presentation.

@jknengr796

5 жыл бұрын

There is no "science" here.

@PauwMedia-Filmproducties

4 жыл бұрын

@@jknengr796 Right. There is no "science" here but there is science here. Oh, and you didn't watch these 90 minutes, so you can't say anything about it ;-)

@jknengr796

4 жыл бұрын

@@PauwMedia-Filmproducties Good gawd. There is absolutely no evidence for your friggen global flood. none. There is just as much evidence to support it as there is to support a large toy factory in the northern polar regions operated by a large bearded man wearing a red suit.

@alexscott730

4 жыл бұрын

@@jknengr796 Keep using opinion and emotion rather than concrete facts to back up your retorts kiddo...🤣👍

@ivanivonovich9863

4 жыл бұрын

This is not "SCIENCE", this is "woo". As in garbage/make-believe! I.E. He dreamed this up or just pulled it from his a... The tectonics involved in his description would rip the planet apart, not bring about a "global flood". And what is the cause for the plate movements?

Thank you Dr. Wise

Now this is real science, with examples as proof. Why isn't this taught in public schools, it's sooo obvi! I like this kind of science! 👱

Great content on this channel! Thank you!

Best Video on the flood I have seen! It answered a lot of the questions I had. I love videos like this. Keep up the great work!!!

@peteconrad2077

4 жыл бұрын

Did it explain the strange lack of vertebrate fossils in the lower strata and then the lack of mammal fossils in all but the higher star at and the compete absence of human remains in anything but surface accretion. Delusional.

@michaelhughes1480

4 жыл бұрын

in other words i am a creationist

so interesting..wish i could ask some questions

You gotta love a guy that geeks out over chalk and rocks. 😆

One question; where is the source(s) for the sediment contained within the 5 mega-sequences as discussed by Dr. Wise?

@BibleResearchTools

3 жыл бұрын

Pete Chimney, you wrote, "One question; where is the source(s) for the sediment contained within the 5 mega-sequences as discussed by Dr. Wise?" Good question. My guess is the sediment was eroded from the edges of the new continents as they separated from a single continent (Pangaea?) probably at what is now known as the mid-oceanic ridge.The scripture speaks of the "great deep" breaking open: _"In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened." -- Gen __7:11__ KJV_ This video explains an engineer's theory of the origin of sedimentary rock. It also theorizes the origin of the cementing agent for the sediment: kzread.info/dash/bejne/noic0cOQY6i8kag.html That is not so far-fetched. God told us that the land area of the earth -- the "firmament" -- was originally suspended in the earth's water, with water both above and below the firmament: _"And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good." -- Gen 1:6-10 KJV_ When the fountains of the "great deep" broke open, the water under the firmament was released violently into the atmosphere. This is the rest of the story: _"You covered [the earth] with the deep [with water] as with a garment; the waters stood above the mountains. At your rebuke they [the waters] fled; at the sound of your thunder they took to flight. The mountains rose, the valleys sank down to the place that you appointed for them. You set a boundary that they may not pass, so that they [the waters] might not again cover the earth." -- Ps 104:6-9 ESV_ Dan

@foreveryoung5

3 жыл бұрын

@@BibleResearchTools I live near Stanage edge Ridge in the UK. Its amazing to explore. I can now explain to people how the bottom of the sea/river is covering the area 1,503 ft above sea level.

@BibleResearchTools

3 жыл бұрын

@@foreveryoung5, I have never been there, but it looks like a breathtakingly beautiful place: www.bing.com/images/search?q=Stanage+edge+Ridge&form=HDRSC2&first=1&scenario=ImageBasicHover Dan

So fascinating! Thanks for sharing your insights!

This is truly very insightful.....

I live near stanage Ridge in the UK. Amazing to see the bottom of a river sandstone formed on top of the ridge 1,503 feet above sea level.

@UKFishingFinesse

3 жыл бұрын

Gloucestershire by any chance

@foreveryoung5

3 жыл бұрын

@@UKFishingFinesse near sheffield lol

@aaronforsythe9442

3 жыл бұрын

“But that was just formed over time”. I hear this all the time. It takes more faith to believe in old earth then to believe in biblical creation.

@Jeremy9697

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaronforsythe9442 lmao not if you actually study se facts

@aaronforsythe9442

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jeremy9697 Facts? Predicated upon the old earth model of the world? No such thing.

A gifting of cheerful enthusiasm happily reminds of beloved Professor Paganini at UF. Oxygen in the air, and for the soul!

@tanagranack327

4 жыл бұрын

Just none in the head:)

Thank you for this video! I appreciate your wise and Biblical work! Praise our Lord.

@IsGenesisHistory

6 жыл бұрын

You're certainly welcome. Thanks for watching!

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

777THUTH777, you wrote, "The biblical work is fine, Too bad it does Not match what scientists find in nature." There is a lot of bad science out there, and most of the really bad ones work in the mythical fields of evolutionism and "climate change" Wanna hear something funny? In the middle of last century, the "age of the earth", as claimed by evolutionism geologists, had become greater than the "age of the universe" as claimed by evolutionism astronomers. After some "brow-beating" by the "earthly" crowd, the "heavenly" crowd gave in and changed the Hubble Constant to make the universe appear older. This segment by Dr. Tasman Walker provides the nuts and bolts: _"[Cherry Lewis in "The Dating Game"] describes a curious complication that emerged in the late 1940s. As the age of the earth gradually crept up towards 3000 million years, and beyond, the earth eventually became twice as old as the universe (p. 191). As with Kelvin, the issue became a battle of wills across scientific disciplines._ _The age of the universe was calculated from the Hubble constant, assuming the big bang history for the universe. Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) had such standing that no-one seriously questioned his value for the constant. As recently as 1936, Hubble had concluded that any further revision of the constant would only be of minor importance._ _So the blame was levelled at radioactive dating. Even in 1949 it was considered highly improbable that observational changes in the value of the Hubble constant would resolve the timescale problem. Some astronomers were again suggesting that the radioactive decay rate had changed with time (yet modern creationists are castigated for the same suggestion!)._ _But the astronomers eventually gave in. In the 1950s new measurements of the Hubble constant extended the age of the universe and at last it was ‘safely older than the age of the Earth’ (p. 191). This dramatic episode again illustrates that the age issue is a battle of wills and beliefs, and not a scientifically measurable parameter" [Tasman B Walker, "Western culture and the age of the earth." Creation Ministries International, 2000]_ LOL! You gotta admit that is funny. Dan

@mybizzz1738

6 жыл бұрын

Bible Research Tools: you said: "LOL! You gotta admit that is funny." (you are correct :D)

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

my bizz17, That is cool! Thanks for the link. I added it to my Research Library. I particularly liked the end of the video where it was explained how animals in one layer were buried before animals in lower layers because of the slope. Dan

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

Juno Donat, you wrote, "Give it up. The Bible is a book of plagiarized mythology. End of story." That is a common statement by low-information types. Do you have anything in particular in the Bible you object to; or are you merely parroting the ignorance of other low-information types? Admit it, Juno. You have never read the Bible. Dan

I love listening to this guy I don't know why but I keep watching his videos just something I like man being sober is weird

We are all witnessing the brilliance of kurt wise proving the bible is true.

Fantastic presentation. Took loads of notes! 💕

Wow, I really enjoyed this all presentation. I was looking for answers, and I get here. Thank for sharing these knowledge and conclusions.

@Molluskenkoenig

4 жыл бұрын

These answers are wrong tho.

@TheCheapPhilosophy

4 жыл бұрын

Funny how geologists without a religious agenda, will not omit certain facts he completely forgot to tell, somehow...

Great teacher, I learned a lot!

@GreatBigRanz

Жыл бұрын

all the wrong things.

Interesting. Are there such columns from in or near diamond mines?

I love this guy. 👍🏼

Wow, for how tedious it must of been to explain that sure is convincing. Thank you.

Great job 👏

My nephew is living in the precocious era.

@jcmick8430

3 жыл бұрын

I'm stuck in the early pretentious

@jeffduggan387

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I especially like the part about bioturbation! Lamination is strong indication of rapid deposited sediment.

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

Mazman2005, you wrote, "especially like the part about bioturbation! Lamination is strong indication of rapid deposited sediment" The segment on lamination/bioturbation is adequate proof of the flood by itself. I have made notes from this video series of the following geological events that support a global flood (among others): 1. Transcontinental megasequence rock layering 2. Megasequences contain graduated sediments (larger to smaller particles, bottom to top) 3 Laminate layers (very little bioturbation) 4. Little or no erosion between layers, denoting rapid layering. 5. Consistent east-to-west currents (denoting the moon holding the flood water while the earth revolves under it) 6. Sand transported across continents. 7. Rock layers folded, not fractured, denoting soft, pliable rock layering when plate tectonics began to divide the continents. 8. High and dry sea creatures (even in the Himalayan plateau) 9. Fossil graveyards everywhere, even though fossilization is a complicated, rare occurrence under normal circumstances. Dan

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

777THUTH777, you asked a series of questions: "1. Where is the global layer. 2. Name the global graduated layer made by the global flood" What does that even mean? Are you referring to the megasequences? If so, the Sauk extends across North American and into Europe. The Tippecanoe covers North America and extends into Europe and Africa. There are coal layers spanning from the United States, across Europe, and into Russia. Dolomite, a sedimentary rock formed mostly from limestone and lime mud, is found world wide. Chalk beds appear from England to Kazakhstan, and in the U.S. and Australia. "3. We find distinct layers of different kinds of rock which a flood can not make" All rock layers above the precambrian are sedimentary. Watch the video. "4. There is a 250 million year Unconformity [gap in the geologic column] in the Grand Canyon." That is evolutionism hogwash. The earth is no more than 7500 years old. Remember, evolutionists believe the Universe magically appeared out of nothing. LOL! "5. Crossbedding would require the currents to go one way then another." The currents of the sedimentary layering are consistently east to west (actually northeast to southwest post-Pangea) "6. Wind can transport sand and cause cross bedding" Of course it can. The question to ask is, what are the differences between wind-transported and water-transported layering? I believe that that has already answered for you by the IsGenesis staff. "7. Rock can be folded without cracking if it is under pressure" There would be evidence if that occurred in hard rock, such as grain elongation, and/or breaking and re-crystallization of the "binding cement". Those evidences are missing in the Grand Canyon layering. "8. Plate Tectonics pushes up old sea beds into mountains" Nope. Check out this segment for a solution: kzread.info/dash/bejne/oGZ1sLeEg6mYcqg.htmlh16m40s "9. Where are all these graveyards you creatards are talking about? Why are there different fossils in different layers? Why aren't there any graveyards full of mammals?" Evotards are perpetually stuck on stupid. The sedimentary layers are loaded with fossils. One such graveyard -- of the Nautiloids -- is mentioned in this video. Another nearby graveyard is in the Bighorn Basin of Wyoming, where billions of Belemnites (a type of squid) made their final resting place. Those two graveyards imply entire schools were trapped in the ocean currents, and then deposited over land as the currents subsided. And, of course, there is the "Ashley Beds" of the southern U.S. which contain a mix of land and sea animals, including dinosaurs, horses, porpoises, elephants, deer, pigs, dogs, and more. Far away in the Mongolian Gobi Desert is another graveyard containing a mix of dinosaurs and mammals. And don't forget our southern friends, where the massive South African Karoo formation contains billions of animals. Others are mentioned here: isgenesishistory.com/fossil-graveyards/ Dan

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

You posted a video of loony Aron Ra? How did you ever get caught up in his cult? God help you escape. Dan

@howardf5264

5 жыл бұрын

His comments on bioturbation are completely wrong or misleading. First of all bioturbation is extremely common in the stratigraphic record at all levels in marine sediments (which is most sediments). In fact, non-bioturbated strata are the exception for sand and shale. Second there are other ways to get laminated sediments besides the Dead Sea or rapid deposition, and that is just about any sediment deposited in fresh water, such as in lakes. And lastly no marine burrowers go down 30 ft, that is just absurd.

@JennySimon206

4 жыл бұрын

@@BibleResearchTools I want to know more about what you think about the moon holding the water.

Great guy to listen to - love his passion.

@davmus1112

4 жыл бұрын

Ya except he's wrong

@baberoot1998

4 жыл бұрын

@@davmus1112 Of course he is wrong...because YOU say so. Lol.

@davmus1112

4 жыл бұрын

@@baberoot1998 you did hear him say we refer to the bible for science right? Thats rediculous. And oh by the way, he is referring to sedimentology....and thats what geologists do, and they say he's wrong

@zumbinisgm

4 жыл бұрын

@@davmus1112 No, he said that the Bible tells the truth about history of the Earth and origins. A Biblical creationist must interpret the geological evidence in the light of a Biblical worldview. 2 Peter 3:1-17. See also the documentary film Is Genesis History? (and three following DVDs: Rocks & Fossils, Life & Design, and Bible & Stars). You do the same thing when you interpret the geology in light of your evolutionary naturalistic worldview, beginning from the assumption that present "clocks" are the key to the age of the Earth and its layers, and the presupposition that everything came about by natural processes, an unproveable assumption.

And the animals stepped from the Ark and walked back home???

Interesting observation. The water prevailed 150 days over the earth. It is 5 complete moon Cycle's. It correlates perfectly with the 5 sequences of the lithostratigrapic layers. That will surely influence the speed of the water and the sediment.

@Calatriste54

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, very interesting observations..

@interman7715

4 жыл бұрын

Just another Mesopotamian fairy tale.

@rawlity7869

4 жыл бұрын

@@interman7715 You use a tale(which is actually based on reality) to call other things a tale? Research about fairy bones being discovered and other abominations that Satan formed through hybridisation, both pre and after The Great Deluge, the real Cataclysm, in which World of Warcraft was based on: -"Reality is stranger than fiction, for fiction is limitly based on reality, but reality has no limits." -"Truth is hidden in PLAIN SIGHT" -"Question the world" -"Real science is not exempt from error, therefore, the real science is questions after questions, if you cannot question, then it's a dogma that was impulsionated by an indoctrination beast system ruled by the secret societies that work for and whorship the Adversary, Satan" -"Most of modern science is scientism, sudo-science, for the usage of enormous numbers and ridiculous theories that are not observable are the repetition used in the school system." -"Real science proves the creation, and proves how everything has an origin and disorder cannot create order, neither unintelligence creates intelligence, therefore, what proves the creation proves the Creator Himself."

@interman7715

4 жыл бұрын

@@rawlity7869 If you cannot question the Bible is that not a dogma? Science is not perfect nor is religion ,but at least science is free to inquire and study and observe . The worldwide flood myth has been totally dispelled on every point from the timeline involved to the ridiculous notion of housing all the species on the Ark , let alone how you get wombats to walk from Australia to the Middle East.

@amilias1000

4 жыл бұрын

@@interman7715 They didn't walk they where taken there by the survivors of the flood.

This is phenomenal teaching!

Bravo!

i genuinely enjoyed this, but that burp was priceless lololol

@MakiGirl2010

2 жыл бұрын

28:56 :D

Amen, Brother. Great presentation. I was able to follow along, and I am in no way a scientist! Thanks, and praised be His holy name.

@MrWholphin

4 жыл бұрын

Yep, realising you’ve somehow missed a global flood must be pretty embarrassing

@theTavis01

3 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen5961 There is real actual scientific evidence of a global flood, but it's not what these clowns are promoting. There are several pieces of evidence pointing to enormous amounts of ice being melted all at once by multiple meteor impacts, in Greenland and possibly also the Himalayas. This was the end of the last Ice Age, 12000 years ago. In Greenland they just recently found a crater by looking through the ice with radar. It's massive and is only under 12000 years of ice. Likewise, in the Himalayas, there is one ice sheet that dates to 500,000 years ago but all the rest seem to only be only 12000 years old. Then you have geological evidence like the Missoula flood plains, a layer of carbon soot in the strata 12000 years ago, the extinction of the megafauna 12000 years ago, the lack of archeology from before 12000 years ago, etc, etc. Terrifying but true.

@theTavis01

3 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen5961 I'm talking about very recent cutting edge research just published in peer review literature in the last 2 or 3 years. It's very likely that the Ice Age ended all at once, with large portions of the ice in Greenland and the Himalayas melting all at once (the evidence is stronger for Greenland because they found the impact carter, but 12000 years old high temperature residue from a meteor was also found in Syria meaning it was a widespread multiple impact event). The water probably didn't cover literally ever last bit of land, but it's very likely, since humans build on rivers and coats, that it *_did_* flood pretty much every place where people lived. There is very little archeological evidence, anywhere, from humans before 12000 years ago, and there is also a mass extinction event 12000 years ago of the megafauna which happened in North America primarily, not the Middle East.

@theTavis01

3 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen5961 You don't know that there wasn't civilization. If there was a civilization that got destroyed by the flood, by definition you wouldn't have evidence of it. Also, you probably will think this isn't true, but there are powerful conspiratorial forces in this world that seek to keep that civilization hidden, for whatever reason. According to them, Atlantis is real. Most likely in America. Take it or leave it. My personal opinion is that it's incredibly likely that the Egyptian pyramids were from this time, which is why the knowledge of how/why they were made has been lost. All that speculation aside, why do you think this contradicts the story of Noah?

@theTavis01

3 жыл бұрын

@@ozowen5961 "There was no global and devastating flood." Huh? You literally agreed with me about this in your last comment, saying it was "known". Make up your mind. Also, I don't know if you can really say "known" in a scientific sense, as it remains a hypothesis for now. "And lots of civilisations failed to get drenched." Name a single place other than Australia, which would have been separated from any advanced civilization anyways. 1) What do you mean "dry layers"? 2) What do you mean "arial layers"? 3) I have no idea what you are talking about. All of the major sedimentary layers along with the fossils were laid down long before Noah's Flood. You are responding to creationist garbage and not the Bible account.

40:20 The marine bio grad student vs the hurricane...!

@mmoore9954

4 жыл бұрын

But in my own case it was the engineering grad student vs the cyclone (separator).....!!

This is impressive. And more impressive is that he has experience fistfighting underwater. 1:05:23. I like this guy.

@11:40 so if the colors on the lithographic strata of different column samples "do not look the same" then HOW DO YOU CLAIM THAT THEY NONETHELESS ARE SO?

Considering the small remark in Genesis6 about “the sons of God taking human wives…” ans the Fallen ones attempting to contaminate the entire gene pool to prevent “ the seed of the woman” crushing the ‘head’ of the ‘serpent’, this explains the ‘how of why’ of total destruction.

@appaloosa42

9 ай бұрын

Got it in one!

Love this guy! - so enthusiastic ! Great video btw - Love it at 28:30 ..buuurp.! Haha

@kz6713

5 жыл бұрын

Im pooping right now

@jonnykrivan6840

5 жыл бұрын

Good on ya mate !!!👍🏻

On a sufficiently large scale, biofurbation becomes massfurbation!

@Jigglepoke

3 жыл бұрын

This is hilarious

Nautiloid or Naughty-Lloyd? Hmmm Great lecture Dr. Wise Given all of the evidence, I am convinced that Noah’s flood was indeed a real occurrence in the earths history. I’m glad that I wasn’t there to be consumed by it.

What a wonderful presentation! So illuminating!

How thick did he say that chalk layer was? Must of been an awful lot of shelled organisms floating around in the preflood world. I wonder what climate could support life on that kind of scale in the oceans in the 1600 years or so from the start of creation.

@jamesengland7461

3 жыл бұрын

A hundred feet thick

@BlGGESTBROTHER

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesengland7461 The limestone deposits that make up the Cliffs of Dover are over 1300 feet deep.

@jamesengland7461

3 жыл бұрын

@@BlGGESTBROTHER wow!

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

Biological reproduction rates are ridiculously fast. Getting a huge number of organisms in a short period of time is not at all a problem. If people had consistently doubled the population every 100 years (far slower than is actually possible) from the flood until now, there would be over 100 TRILLION people on earth right now.

@jensbasement3862

2 жыл бұрын

@@mmaimmortals exactly. It's not that hard to believe given that ppl bred very fast back then.

Great video. That pronunciation of Tejas hurt my Texan soul, though. It's TAY-hoss. It's the Spanish spelling of the Caddo word for friend.

@BibleResearchTools

3 жыл бұрын

Francisco d'Anconia, you wrote, "Great video. That pronunciation of Tejas hurt my Texan soul, though. It's TAY-hoss. It's the Spanish spelling of the Caddo word for friend." Francisco, A southern machine-shop employee and his wife visited California for the first time. On the flight back, the stewardess ask where in California did they stay. He replied, "San Josey." The stewardess immediately corrected him: "It is pronounced San Ho-zay'. The 'j' is pronounced like an 'h'." He acknowledged her correction, and added, "We also flew down and visited a friend in El Ka-John." Again, she corrected with, "The same rule applies: it is pronounced "El Ka-Hone." He replied, "I think I understand." She smiled and asked if they were planning on visiting California again, to which he replied, "Yea, we were thinking about maybe next Hune or Huly." Dan

Please explain the continuous KT boundary?

This is brilliant. Thankyou thankyou thankyou. This is exactly what I needed for my grand children. Professiona!l God bless. My friends watched the Genisis History film that came up on our youtube feed. Subcribed and then we found this one. A treasure. Thankyou for your generosity of making this available. A blessed Day of rememberence tomorrow . THE CREATOR IS RISEN !! From Australia .

Dr.Wise, Wow! What a great presentation. I thoroughly enjoyed this video! Thank you!

Good video

In a million years from now. I'm guessing we humans will all be gone, but there'll be a layer of coke cans, cigarette butts, plastic bags and Macca's rubbish 50 miles thick across the whole globe. We should be so proud

@shahihamayuun9325

2 жыл бұрын

What is macca?

Does Dr. Wise have any books to read?

The grand canyon was formed very quickly by massive amounts of rushing water, that's why the walls are fairly steep. If it took millions of years, the walls would be more shaped like a wide V.

@freelanceminion7396

2 жыл бұрын

But those walls are not a soft rock that erodes away quickly. Why do we not see it collapsing so quickly today?

@freelanceminion7396

2 жыл бұрын

Every geologist disagrees with you. The people who know the most say this is wrong.

@ronniebuchanan6575

Жыл бұрын

​@@freelanceminion7396 it's very hard rock today. But right after the flood the walls would have been jjust soft enough because the sediment laid down during the flood has enough time to harden up to stand but soft enough to be carved by rushing water. Now with that said the lake that drained through the canyon was massive. inverted Wyoming and several other states. Also look at Mt Saint Helen's the mini canyon carved there is in solid rock. We know the river didn't carve the Grand canyon. Thst little river verses width of canyon. Where the river enters the canyon the top of canyon is 6,000 ft lower than where it exits the canyon. We all know water doe as not run up hill.

@freelanceminion7396

Жыл бұрын

@@ronniebuchanan6575 And what geologist has told you that is how rock works? Because I've spoken with geologists, people who study this stuff their entire adult life from others who study it their whole life, etc, who laugh at that idea. To refute this chain of thousands of people studying hundreds of years you have "I think it might be..."

@aaronfield7899

Жыл бұрын

@@freelanceminion7396 Well Kurt Wise has a PhD in geology. So if "every" geologist thinks he's wrong, use their source against his.

How would the animals have survived after the vegetation being ruined from being submerged for a year or more? And how did the animals unique to Australia get there?

@charlieindigo

4 жыл бұрын

@Jasper Jones I think perhaps one needs to employ a little logicality to your question and indeed, your statements. The dimensions of the Ark were very specific, and can be supported scientifically. According to God's plan, the Ark held enough pairs of animals to produce sufficient offspring to repopulate the earth. The Ark was big enough to hold enough food, not only for the 12-13 months of The Flood, but for some time afterwards. The flood most certainly ripped trees and vegetation from the earth, but in clumps, the billions of tons of vegetation would float, and as the waters subsided, these would take root again quite quickly, so there would have been food galore for the "vegetarian" animals. Noah did not need to house sea creatures, so they would not have been on the Ark. Similarly, enough birds and insects would have survived on the mass of vegetation, so they did not need any help in feeding or multiplying. As for the meat-eating animals, it's a pretty sure bet that all of them could have had lunch, dinner and supper pretty regularly on the carcasses left from the floods, as well as those like bears and cats amongst others that catch fish - and birds for that matter. Do you honestly think that God would have gone to all that trouble, only to "forget" the food necessary after the floods had subsided? As I said, sometimes we need to think logically. To put it in a different perspective; how many street urchins around the world today seem able to survive on the garbage they find in the streets, out of bins and just from plain scavenging? Millions! Animals do exactly the same thing, and when they get beyond normal hunger pangs, they'll eat anything. Noah had plenty of food for the animals - after all, he didn't house full-grown creatures, but only those young enough to be easily fed and would reach maturity within a short space of time after The Flood - enogh time for fresh roots, shrubs, flowers, seeds, nuts and fruit to become plentiful. Animals like dogs, cats, foxes &etc, produce more than one offspring, and more often than humans. Rats and mice can produce offspring at incredible rates, and every one of them - save only two of each kind - can produce enough offspring to feed an entire menagerie. Logical thinking, my friend!

@Dark_Force_Of_Wishes

3 жыл бұрын

Local Flood.

@BlGGESTBROTHER

3 жыл бұрын

@@charlieindigo So you want us to believe that the vegetation got ripped out, clumped up, and then floated in super heated and salinated water for over a year and then somehow replanted itself afterwards? Who’s your dealer and what’s his number because I want some of whatever you’re smoking!

@ndjarnag

2 жыл бұрын

@@charlieindigo lol

@reggriffiths5769

2 жыл бұрын

@@BlGGESTBROTHER Obviously reading English and having a modicum of logic don't come easily to you, but in any event, I don't want you to believe anything you don't want to believe! However, for the uprooted trees and shrubs, nobody said anything about them remaining in the water, although we are talking about a worldwide catastrophe, so the oceans would have been full of floating greenery - and if it were needed, could have been harvested for weeks if not months, but the Ark was built large enough to hold enough food for all - as I stated, and if you had taken the time to read. The small creatures like rats and mice also produced enough offspring to feed the carnivores - as I stated if you could piece the logic. Nowhere is there a mention of superheated water throughout the entire world world flood; in fact, we know that superheated water occurs in only a small number of areas, and not in sufficient quantity to affect other areas. So rather than make insulting comments, why not make an attempt to use what grey matter you have and open your mind to the possible. There is enough scientific evidence to substantiate a worldwide flood, but very little to state otherwise. Perhaps you are one of those Flat Earth idiots who do not accept the obvious, don't like the science, and refuse to accept a Creator. Don't worry though, you are not alone, for there are millions just like you who don't have the ability to think things through. It's why more intelligent people such as Dr Wise take the time to explain.

Could the trans continental sequences (video at 53 min) be related to a Earth reversal and ocean water pouring over the continents? or Earth slowing with inertia of oceans flooding the continents? The Bible has described the Sun stopping, but I don't think the time sequence is matching. These mega sequences may indicate cycles, but you have indicated that cycles are not plausible.

Dr. Wise, wouldn't the Earth's rotation also be a factor in the Flood's flow from east to west?

@johanterblans8266

4 жыл бұрын

It is. In the other longer lecture he mentions that the moon actually 'holds' the water while the earth spins underneath. That's why it's the east west direction.

I have a lithostratic column in the morning.

@baberoot1998

4 жыл бұрын

So...THAT...is why that bump is on your head.

It has been calculated that it would take 4.3 times all the earth's water to achieve the Noah flood levels described in bible. Where did the water come from? It could not come from the oceans because such rapid evaporation would lower the sea level sufficient to accommodate all the flood waters, meaning that the mountains would not have been under water. Next, where could the water run off to? When the sea levels rise above the mountain tops there is no "downhill" for the waters to flow away. Why doesn't he address these issues? Maybe because he hasn't thought this thing through.

@johanterblans8266

4 жыл бұрын

The other longer lecture on this is fascinating. It will address this question way beyond satisfactory.

@zumbinisgm

4 жыл бұрын

Are you assuming mountains and mountain ranges of the 8000 meter heights on the Earth today? If so, you would be right. However, if today's mountains are the *result* of the Flood and its aftermath, and the pre-Flood world had only smaller mountains , if the land was a single continent which was broken up, then the flood waters didn't have to be as deep, by far. The water was also coming from *under* the Earth. The rains from above ended after 40 days, but the waters *prevailed* (kept rising) on the Earth for 150 days and more. See Genesis 7:17-24. Magma added to the ocean floors from would have made the ocean basins heavier, so they would sink. The lighter continents would float higher, and as floodwaters drained off the continents at the end of the Flood and after, they would continue to rise. The tectonic motion we observe today are the continuing after effects of the violent catastrophic of the worldwide Flood, the breakup of an original continent, There would be plenty of room for the floodwaters o drain into the newly deepened ocean basins. *The modern ocean waters, depths and volume, even its saltiness, are the waters of Noah' Flood!*

@JesusIstheNameTakenInVain

3 жыл бұрын

Is that including all the water inside the earth ? There are massive bodies of water in the earth

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

@ Brus No 1 A lot of imaginary things have been calculated. There is still more water in the crust and under the ocean floors today than there is water in the oceans that we can see. The water to flood the continents came from the fountains of the great deep, just as the Bible says. Fountains of water still pour up from beneath the ocean floor. This was (re) discovered in the early 1900s. Later, the ocean floors collapsed, after losing large volumes of water and pressure. This is evident by the fact that here are huge canyons and tens of thousands of guyots in the ocean floor. Those are plained off volcanoes that used to be thousands of feet higher than they are today. A little knowledge of geophysics goes a long way toward dispelling mythological ideas, such as what you imagine to be necessary for a global flood to occur.

I figure that that the hydrothermal vents that jetted water during the flood had a lot of sodium chloride in it. This salt fell like snow becoming many feet thick. Afterwards sediments covered this up. Since the rock sediments are denser than salt, the salt poked up into it, producing salt domes. Did you notice for the salt to do this without fracturing the whole lithographic column had to be like wet cement?

So how did erosional surfaces between the sequences happen? Don't we need time for that?

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

No, you don’t need time for that. Time only complicates things. Had significant amounts of time passed, very random and pronounced erosional patterns would be visible. Not to mention paleo soils should also be visible between the layers, but they aren’t. The erosion that is apparent is planar in nature. Sedimentary layers are placed from left to right, not top to bottom. This means that the very sediments that are emplaced are responsible for the planar erosion while they are being laid down.

@Fordry

2 жыл бұрын

There's an almost total lack of anything like the canyons and gullies we see today in the geologic column. If there were millions of years between there'd have to be more.

The salt water would have killed all of the plants during the flood. Hence all of the animals and people would have died of starvation. Or the people would have survived but no animals, because they ate them or starve to death.

@mastodonxrp5314

3 жыл бұрын

Possible that all the new fresh water raining down onto the Earth during the Flood diluted the salinity of the original oceans and seas. This could have allowed submerged vegetation to survive 30 to 40 days underwater.

@larryvanbarriger6670

3 жыл бұрын

@@mastodonxrp5314 I believe the part of the bible where there was inbreeding, because I see tons of evidence of that. But none to show Noah's flood ever existed.

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

@@larryvanbarriger6670 “...salt water...killed...plants...” This is nonsense and the antithesis of critical thinking. Noah took seed of all that is eaten on the ark with him. And plants, seeds, etcetera can survive just fine in dormancy for a few months until water levels fall. The flooding portion took 5 months, meaning many areas were under water less than that. The draining portion took about 7 months, but within a few days land was already visible again. Not to mention floating debris mats that likely carried seeds and sprouts for when they settled back down to the ground again.

@larryvanbarriger6670

2 жыл бұрын

@@mmaimmortals ok so they reseed the whole planet? And I'm not a critical thinker, that's funny.

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

@@larryvanbarriger6670 Do you have any idea of exponential biological reproduction rates, especially of plants?? Most plants can double their numbers in well under a year on average. Like two pine trees can turn into 40 pine trees in a single year, easily. The rate is so fast, your calculator can’t even compute how many there should be of a given plant (or animal), with a high birth rate and low death rate for a 4400 year time span. So yes, they reseeded the whole planet in a few decades to a few hundred years. Try calculating what the current number of rabbits would be if two rabbits doubled their population size every 20 years - much slower than they are actually capable of - for 4400 years. The fact that there aren’t quadrillions upon multiplied quadrillions of rabbits today tells you that normal birth and death rates have applied for 4400 years. In the evolutionary scenario, rabbits must have had an average doubling time of their population in excess of 1 million years. Which is ridiculous.

His "lithostratigraphic cloumn" ist nonsense in respect that it would mean that there were the identical conditions worldwide under which rocks were formed. Actually a lithostratigrafic unit is also defined by it´s geographic distribution. Considering the model that all continets formed once the supercontinent Pangea in very old sediments you might see similarties but this is absolutely not true for younger formations.

@danielbrowniel

3 жыл бұрын

You've missed the point.

why does the sound drop out?

@goofyskittles

3 жыл бұрын

Satan lol

Another comment. In many interior basins of the US there are shales that were deposited in the Late Devonian- Early Mississippian. These are the Bakken (Williston), Woodford (Anadarko), Antrim (Michigan), etc. These are all dark gray to black and full or organic material and are world-class source rocks for oil. These shales were deposited in anoxic conditions, i.e. lack of oxygen. So answer this, present a model where these shales accumulated in anoxic conditions during an alleged world-wide catastrophic flood that supposedly churned the water column and oxygenated the entire water column.

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

Pay close attention. One global flood does not produce one global uniform result. That is the whole point of these presentations. Water moves and topography varies widely. The flood lasted 371 days from start to finish. That means that a large plethora of scenarios is going to arise. So there is no such thing as oxygenating the entire water column globally.

@petechimney6755

2 жыл бұрын

@@mmaimmortals Oxygenation of the water column has nothing to do with the deposition of evaporite minerals. Some of these minerals include, in increasing levels of salinity: gypsum, halite, sylvite and carnalite. These minerals are found all across the Earth in various basins and in various stratigraphic layers. Some basins have several widely separate3d evaporite units , e.g. Williston Basin, which argues evaporite conditions prevailed, then halted, then returned a number of times. It is impossible to precipitate evaporite minerals when there is a worldwide flood covering the surface of the Earth.

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

@@petechimney6755 “Oxygenation did the water column has nothing to do with...” You’re the one that said the entire water column was oxygenated, supposing it is antithetical to evaporites. I’m pointing out that such global scale oxygenation of the water column isn’t even likely. As far as evaporite conditions coming and going, there is nothing about a global flood that prevents this from happening. Besides that, the term evaporite presupposes a condition in uniformitarian terms that may not even apply. But besides all of that, not every geologic formation has to be explained in the context of a single global flood in one year. There are three major events, as well as thousands of minor (local) events that may be responsible. The three major ones are creation, the flood, and the ice age. The ice age lasted about 500 to 700 years and is characterized by warm oceans. Which means faster evaporation in the summer. It also means continued local floods for an extended period of time while lakes and rivers are forming. You’re arguing against your own imaginary version of world history - ie your own idea of what someone else’s model should entail.

@petechimney6755

2 жыл бұрын

@@mmaimmortals For evaporite minerals to form requires arid conditions, i.e. evaporation rates exceeding precipitation rates. This is why one finds the Bonneville Salt Flats in the desert area of Utah and not in southern Louisiana where rainfall usually exceeds evaporation rates. This condition of high evaporation and low precipitation for the formation of evaporite minerals has prevailed for eons. I still do not see how this scenario can be explained when there was a worldwide flood covering the surface of the Earth for a year or more. And the presence of evaporites in the rock record stretches from the deep Cambrian sediments up to modern day sediments and is present in rock units in between over all of the Earth in various sedimentary basins.

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

@@petechimney6755 Why do you think the flood covered the earth “for a year or more”? The Bible doesn’t say that, and no informed creationist believes that. The flood lasted about 371 days. Nothing about that suggests that the water covered the earth the entire time.

The break up of the Fountains of the Deep is where most of the Flood waters came from. It rained 40 days/nights but the Flood lasted over a year! The big lie is that there is no nice layer cake of sediments.

@angelpabon7667

6 жыл бұрын

There are older layers on top of younger layers and if U think that little river carved that canyon U are bonkers! That was a huge washout after the Glaciers melted, even the secular scientists now see that. Look what Mt.St. Helens created when it blew, all the snow malted and a rushing torrent of water gouged it's own path. Oh wait, u look 2 young 2 remember that!

@angelpabon7667

6 жыл бұрын

U are way older than I but it seems U have your high priests of Science, which are theories. Evolution is a lie, it's a theory, not a fact!

@davidmclaughlin3093

6 жыл бұрын

the glaciers may not have reached that far, but I am sure the waters from them did ….

@mrburns366

5 жыл бұрын

Where did all the water go after the flood? It's not in the atmosphere and it's not underground. The amount of water necessary doesn't exist on Earth. I know why.. the flood is a myth.

@stephenfennell

5 жыл бұрын

To@@mrburns366 : There have been at least 2 discoveries, in about the last 10 or 20 years, of vast amounts of water far below the Earth's surface. New Scientist reported one discovery in 2016, search for "Deepest water found 1000km down, a third of way to Earth’s core"

great presentation the wonders of God are beatiful

Too awesome

I would like to have the contact of Kurt wise

Why is God and the Bible your starting point?

@EmperorHero1

3 жыл бұрын

Cause he is Religious.

@truthsings7

3 жыл бұрын

I think it may be partly to determine if science backs and if external evidence is found that _supports_ the account; perhaps a test if validity, if you will

@tonygarrett7214

3 жыл бұрын

@@truthsings7 I’m a little confused by your comment. I don’t think what you are saying makes much sense. I think he is asserting propositional givens without evidence and his following argument must conform to them. Bias and pseudoscience follows. He has to force his argument into the confines of a creationist account.

@BlGGESTBROTHER

3 жыл бұрын

@@tonygarrett7214 He’s making the age old mistake of starting with a conclusion and then trying to fit the evidence to it. Which, as anyone with an elementary knowledge of the scientific method knows, is ass backwards.

@waywardspirit7898

2 жыл бұрын

@@BlGGESTBROTHER You mean like those that want to prove evolution and go out to find fossils proving their preconceived belief? (intermediate fossils which they never find). Your wrong by the way. ALL science starts with a theory and then moves to experiments and research in order to prove ore disprove the theory. You must have a starting point to work from. God bless.

"The nearly 40 major sedimentary rock layers exposed in the Grand Canyon and in the Grand Canyon National Park area range in age from about 200 million to nearly 2 billion years old. Most were deposited in warm, shallow seas and near ancient, long-gone sea shores in western North America." Wikipedia "The Grand Canyon is a steep-sided canyon carved by the Colorado River in Arizona, United States. The Grand Canyon is 277 miles long, up to 18 miles wide and attains a depth of over a mile." Wikipedia I don't see how a flood could wear a groove this long and this deep in one year. Sorry. Dr. Kurt Patrick Wise is an American young earth creationist who serves as the Director of Creation Research Center at Truett McConnell University. He has a PhD in paleontology from Harvard University. He writes in support of creationism and works for the Creation Museum.

@idahoduckhunter

5 жыл бұрын

James Richard Wiley that’s a good observation. In the case of the Grand Canyon a post flood lake drained out dramatically and created the canyon. So the flood deposited the layers, and later on as the waters continued to recede a lake was created that catastrophically drained through the canyon

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

@James Richard Wiley A river did not carve the GC. The Colorado enters at a point below the highest place in the canyon rim and “cuts straight through” the highest elevation. There is literally nothing about the GC geometry that looks like a river carved it. The huge canyons that come off the sides of the main canyon are another really good indicator that large volume flood waters did this. It’s quite likely the the canyon formed because there was a rift in the sediments just below the high ridge I mentioned. As the water sheeted off the continent toward the south west, the rift in the sediment began to erode. Large volumes of sheeting water pouring in from the sides explains the depth, the side canyons, the fractal nature of erosion, and more. If a river were capable of doing that, it should be a common feature across the globe where rivers exist. But it isn’t.

@mmaimmortals

2 жыл бұрын

@@idahoduckhunter A post flood lake did not carve the canyon. If it did, two things should be apparent. 1) a MUCH wider spill way out of the lake at the high point. 2) evidence of ancient shorelines from a lake above the high rim. Neither are present. Instead, the canyon probably formed because of a rift in the sediment below the high point at the beginning of the canyon. From there, the receding flood waters began eroding the rift, making it deeper and deeper. The water spilled in from the sides of the beginning canyon to finish carving it to the current depth. This is evident from all the side canyons that branch off in a fractal pattern from the sides of the main body of the canyon. The complete GC was almost certainly formed before the end of the 371 days of the flood. Not afterward from later geological / hydrological activity.

I have an honest question... If there were enough water in the Earth to cover all land for a year, why was it only a year? Why did it take only one year for that water to dissipate? And where did it go? And where did it come from? How was there all of a sudden double the amount of water on Earth and how did it just disappear? Within. One. Year.

@tnmonty501

4 жыл бұрын

Water vapor

@brett_gardner

4 жыл бұрын

@@tnmonty501 still waiting for a good answer.

@alexscott730

4 жыл бұрын

@@brett_gardner Buddy...How long do you think water takes to evaporate??...The waters receeded into gigantic crevaces in the oceans and evaporated into the air...what's so mind mushing about that?

@richtomlinson7090

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexscott730 so what your saying is b that it must have been extremely hot and dry, but it just rained for a long time. You're not making sense.

@Fordry

2 жыл бұрын

@@brett_gardner watch the 2 hour video on this channel by Wise. He gives their model for how it all went down and answers this question.

Well, get~down!! Hello Dr. Wise, Brother Wise! This is my second chance at watching your video again, and you are still very interesting 🤔 😉 👍 May Jehovah God Bless You, In The Name Of Emmanuel, Jesus The Christ of Nazareth, Amen 🙏

16:54 Banded Iron Formation. Banded Iron formations occur in Proterozoic rocks, ranging in age from 1.8 to 2.5 billion years old

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

MartinIDavies, you wrote, "Banded Iron formations occur in Proterozoic rocks, ranging in age from 1.8 to 2.5 billion years old" That is impossible, Martin. The earth is less than 7,500 years old. Besides, banded-iron forms in the presence of elevated O2 concentrations. Dan

@voiceofreason162

6 жыл бұрын

Ah, here's a problem. The period of Earth's history this describes, according to the theory of evolution, began 2.5 billion years ago and ended 542.0 million years ago and is known as the Proterozoic: which is subdivided into three eras. The Paleoproterozoic (from 2.5 to 1.6 billion years ago), the Mesoproterozoic (from 1.6 to 1 billion years ago), and Neoproterozoic (from 1 billion to 542.0 million years ago). You might as well say, hey, everything below 10 feet is this period. Given what I know about hydrology and how rocks are formed to have the concentration of a thin band can be achieved two ways: the first, there was a global event to lay it. Second, the mechanism is due to sorting in water particles. If the latter is considered the real question isn't how did it get there but what event created a sediment that thick and arranged it thus. The presence of water notoriously deforms geologic era marks to the extent you can't actually date the strata. That's what fossils are for. We all know the circular arguments: rocks date the strata, and strata by the rocks. So really anyone can say its 7.5 Trillion, Billion, Billion years old at the bottom and a 1,000 years old at the top -- and the beauty of this is no one alive can argue with it because its subjective interpretation of the evidence.

@lukecottrell5657

6 жыл бұрын

Bill Bailey and all of that is wrong, so try again

@BibleResearchTools

6 жыл бұрын

Bill Bailey, you wrote, "We all know the circular arguments: rocks date the strata, and strata by the rocks. So really anyone can say its 7.5 Trillion, Billion, Billion years old at the bottom and a 1,000 years old at the top -- and the beauty of this is no one alive can argue with it because its subjective interpretation of the evidence." Good point! It takes a lot of faith to believe in evolution. Dan

@jimwatts7489

6 жыл бұрын

MartinIDavies, and how did you get those dates?

You are a preacher. Stop pretending to be a proper scientist. You are not. A real scientist does not use the by-bull as a constraint on his conclusions.

@MR-cc7zl

3 жыл бұрын

Too bad you didn't listen to the lecture.

@ewg6200

3 жыл бұрын

@@MR-cc7zl I explained very clearly that I reject the bible as a constraint on conclusions. That would be totally un-scientific.

@LTworkshop

Жыл бұрын

Why not both? A preacher who honestly interact with science, and a scientist who preaches the truth.

Loved it! Great job!

@DavidJohnson-xr2rz

4 жыл бұрын

Christian apologists are better at ideological con games, than the politicians that run whatever political party you hate the most. The political con games constantly have to be rethunked, but Christian apologetics goes back 2,000 years.