Beautiful! And I like that it kept the stock displacement. Stroker kits may increase power, but the larger stroke also increases piston speed, which isn't the most desirable thing for high-rpm applications. Even though there are some engines with long stroke out there that rev pretty high, a short stroke one still achieves smoother operation and revs more freely when combined with a head design with plenty of airflow.

@euroconnex2712

13 күн бұрын

@@Roddy_Zeh great points / that’s precisely my thinking. The higher revs will also shorter final drives, in this case, 3.91 will keep very similar top speeds to 3.62. I’m eager to see the final GPS times later in July.

@Roddy_Zeh

13 күн бұрын

@@euroconnex2712 It actually makes me imagine a de-stroked S85 revving past 10-11k rpm...maybe the closest to an actual F1 V10 for the street we'd ever see... Don't forget to keep us updated, please. 🙌🏻😁 And keep up the great work! 😎👍🏻

@euroconnex2712

13 күн бұрын

@@Roddy_Zeh smart man! That is the way I want to further explore these engines.

@Roddy_Zeh

13 күн бұрын

@@euroconnex2712 S85 the world!!! 👏🏻😂 And let the mayhem begin...😈 Thanks a lot!!! 😎🤜🤛😎

@dabrula

11 күн бұрын

​@@Roddy_Zeha 4.5 liter S85 would be ideal, in my opinion. In fact, Gordon Murray initially requested from Honda to make a 4.5 liter V10 for the McLaren F1, before switching over to the BMW V12 that exceeded the power and torque requirements. Naturally, the only issue with +10k RPM's is valve float.

Much more smart thing to do than a Supercharger kit. Dont have to worry about heatsoaking. power as a stroker build almost.

Amazing work. Will be needing these at some point soon.

So 627 hp on 91 oct right? Anyway the result is outstanding! Congratulations!!

@euroconnex2712

15 күн бұрын

That's right! Thank you.

@dronamashina4875

15 күн бұрын

@@euroconnex2712 how much do you think can be gained with 93-94 oct? Couple hp? Or maybe more… 640 hp would be crazy with pump gas.

@euroconnex2712

15 күн бұрын

@@dronamashina4875 probably, the next step isn’t necessarily octane, it’s gearing. The extra revs will allow a 3.91 final drive, while retaining the top speeds per gear of the original 3.62. More torque multiplication should improve real world performance as we are not currently traction limited.

627ps is insane figures , fantastic work on the camshaft bro and tuning. Why didnt you use 95 octane?

@euroconnex2712

15 күн бұрын

Unfortunately, 91 octane is all we have around here. Still, it gives a very realistic take on what is achievable with relatively conservative tuning.

@salmaniftikhar6583

15 күн бұрын

@@euroconnex2712 bro it means 95 ron right ?

@euroconnex2712

15 күн бұрын

@@salmaniftikhar6583 Yes, we can find 94 octane, but I can't get to that pump in any consistent manner, because.. well, V10 :D

🔥🔥 video

Does the car still jave the infinity headers on it?

@euroconnex2712

11 күн бұрын

Yes

Pistons, conrods and cranshaft stock?

@euroconnex2712

14 күн бұрын

Yes.

Is that Reqr Wheel HP?

@euroconnex2712

14 күн бұрын

Hey Michael! This is weather adjusted, rear wheel horsepower on a Powerdyno Mustang dynamometer. I’ll explain the differences with a Dynojet, inertia type dynamometer in upcoming entries. In short, this reads around ~5% to 8% less than a Dynojet. This car would probably read closer to 530-540whp on a dynojet. Take this as a 0.02$, I hate making up numbers.