Discover how INCREDIBLY beautiful and fascinating the Bible really is and learn how YOU can dig deeper and find AMAZING and DEEPLY MEANINGFUL things every time you study this masterpiece. Start reading the Bible with new eyes and get EXCITED about this book like never before!
Interested? Hit that SUBSCRIBE button, grab your Bible and let's go!
DON'T MISS ANYTHING. SUBSCRIBE HERE
👉🏼 bit.ly/masterpiece_bible
MORE FREE RESOURCES
👉🏼 www.masterpiece.bible
GERMAN CHANNEL
👉🏼 kzread.info
MASTERPIECE ON INSTAGRAM
👉🏼 instagram.com/masterpiece.bible
Пікірлер
I saw someone say 1st Enoch interpretation is that they were angels?
Jesus is a son of god, so he must have been there too.
Aaaaaah let us think about this. Genealogies The torah was written between the 7th and 3rd centuries BCE By a people who were shepherds 600 years prior. And they know who existed thousands of years ago I can't name my great grandfather.
You did not do a good job Explaining the original language that phrase sons of god only shows up two other times in the old testament and all three, including genesis six are referring to angelic beings
I want to point out the Adam is called the "son of God" in Luke 3:38 which that the Genealogy of Adam is the godly line called the "sons of God" as you point in Matthew 5:9 and Romans 8:14.
Satan being a woman knew Eve better and could manipulate her.
The Sons of God are Fallen Angles. If you want a full explanation, I will be more than happy to lay it out. You may not like it but it’s the Truth. It will explain the Flood, the Virgin Birth of Jesus, and where we are right now in history. As in the days of Noah. If you don’t understand Genesis 6, and what was happening in Noah’s day, you won’t understand what’s happened after the flood leading up to today.
First the santen serpent (devil) it's very mysterious never explained where he comes from so idiots who write the bible was all men and for them women was Rong most of the time
If you REALLY want the TRUTH read The Urantia Book....
YOU don't make sense. What possessed God to introduce SEX into Eden's garden? Why, if He and the "heavenly host" are sexless, would he have made Adam male and the woman female? And why did she remain without an identity until they were kicked out of the garden? God actually introduced the sex act before he made the woman - the animals were indulging and producing offspring, which did not go unnoticed by Adam. He got it into his head that he could possibly make something similar to himself if he indulged with the animals - so God put him into a state of suspended animation for the duration of the growing of his modified clone. When she saw the animals with babies, SHE wanted some, but Adam couldn't impregnate her, so SHE tried the animals. It's a simple story, but most Bible bashers can't see it because they can't think straight thanks to their indoctrination. Eventually she turned to the custodian of the museum/library ("Tree of Knowledge") in Eden proper, which was off limits to the gardeners and HE impregnated her. Cain was thus the "serpent's" son.
Satan does not exist, Where does the bible use the word satan or devil? It is an old folks tale used to intimidate people. The word Satan is the English transliteration of a Hebrew word for “adversary” in the Bible.
To make sure that everyone understands that Genesis is mythology, not history.
Why Adam is a Man and Eve is a Woman.. this alone is full of temptations, So is the Animal Kingdom you have male and female and it is always male or female fighting over one or the other. BUT there is also a She Man and a He Woman, and also a Hermaphrodite, a male and female at the same time.. is this part of God's Creation too? Doesnt' make sense?
This story is a lie....and it is only told to create a sinful image of sex...saying that it is so bad that...bka bka bka
Would you sleep with your daughters to keep your lineage going? Hopefully everyone says NO!
The serpant in Hebrew is Naha. It doesn't mean literally snake.
Have you ever wondered why patriarchal religions have to demonise women?
This was absolutely revolutionary for me, thank you for so carefully outlining the Bible passage and then making personal application for practice from it like this. So inspirational
My pleasure! Glad it was helpful. :)
Nasty 🤢
The Bible was written by the he-man woman haters club . And Jesus said become wise as serpents but gentle as lambs and teach .... Explain that ! 🤡
Nope. But kudos for trying to resolve the mystery with a literary approach - I haven't seen that done before.
They were royal descendants, human men and its generations of men "taking" women. Which ones? Their patriarchs are mentioned in the genealogy before, i believe
Terrible explanation
Talk about speculation! Not sound exegesis, rather made up ideas.
How about this, Adam was right there the whole time, it was Eve that responded but Adam was right there, she gave to Adam with her.
Awesome study, beautiful revelation. Thanks. God bless you
Eve was the primary target because she was not present when God gave Adam instructions and did not know the truth making her vulnerable and gullible to the serpent’s tricks. She was not cursed in any way, and was not subordinated in any way - by God. Man did this.
Wow, this was extremely helpful.
Great tip! I have learned so much by paying attention to these details in the text. Especially in the narratives.
This is a fascinating topic, one we can agree to disagree on without being rude or nasty. Here is what two of my favorite scholars have to say on this topic. The term "sons of God" (Heb. beney' ha- Elohim) is used in the Old Testament of either angels or men who were true believers, committed to the service of God. Passages that refer to angels as beney' ha- Elohim include Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7 Psalms 29:1; 89:6 (89:7 MT). The Masoretic text does not contain this phrase in Deuteronomy 32:43, but a fragment of a Hebrew text found in Qumran cave 4 reads: "Shout joyously O heavens, with Him, and worship Him O sons of God [beney' ha- Elohim] and ascribed to him might, all you sons of the mighty [bênê 'Ēlîm]. Shout joyously, O nations, concerning His people, and accord strength to Him, all you angels of God [malakhey Elohim]." This is considerably more expanded than the received Hebrew text (MT) of this verse, but it may possibly be the original wording. It was probably the passage quoted in Hebrews 1:6--- though Psalm 97:7 may also be the source for that verse. But the occurrences of beney' ha- Elohim referring to men standing in covenant relationship to God are fully as numerous in the Old Testament as those referring to angels (cf. Deut. 14:1; 32:5; Ps. 73:15; Hos. 1:10 [MT=2:10] ---and we believe Gen. 6:2 as well) The reasons for understanding Genesis 6:2 as referring to members of the covenant family, descendants of the line of Seth, are quite compelling. Scripture clearly teaches that angels are spirits, "ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation" (Hebrews 1:14, NIV) While they may on occasion appear in bodily form in the semblance of men, they have no physical bodies and are therefore utterly incapable of carnal relations with women. The rabbinic speculation that angels are referred to in Genesis 6:2 is a curious intrusion of pagan superstition that has no basis at all in the rest of Scripture. The fact that some children of gigantic stature (v.4) resulted from these marriages offers no evidence whatever of angelic paternity. No one claims that the sons of Anak, Goliath and his brothers had any angelic forebears because of their great stature; nor is there any reason to suppose that of the antediluvian giants had supernatural forebears. What Genesis chapter 6:1-2,4 records is the first occurrence of mixed marriage between believers and unbelievers, with a characteristic result of such unions: complete loss of testimony for the Lord and a total surrender of moral standards. In other words, the "sons of God" in this passage were descendants of the godly line of Seth. Instead of remaining true to God and loyal to their spiritual heritage, they allowed themselves to be enticed by the beauty of ungodly women who were "daughters of men"--- that is, of the tradition and example of Cain. The natural result of such marriages was a debasement of nature on the part of the younger generations, until the entire antediluvian civilization sank to the lowest depths of depravity. The Lord saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time" (v.5, NIV). The inevitable result was judgment, the terrible destruction of the Great Flood. Perhaps one last comment regarding angels would be in order here. If we were to concede that spirits could somehow enter into sexual relations with human beings---which they cannot---then they could not even so be fitted in with this passage here. If they were minions of Satan, that is, fallen angels, then they could not have been referred to as "sons of God." Demons of hell would never be so designated in Scripture. Nor could they have been angels of God, since God's angels always live in total obedience to Him and have no other yearning or desire but to do God's will and glorify His name. A sordid involvement with godless young women would therefore be completely out of character for angels as "sons of God." The only viable explanation therefore, is that the sons of God were descendants of the godly line of Seth. Dr. Gleason L. Archer, Jr. Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties pp. 79-80 Some interpreters claim that in the Old Testament the phrase “sons of God” always refers to angels. The phrase is used in Hosea 1:10 to refer to humans, but advocates of the angels view argue that this phrase cannot mean the same thing as it does in Genesis 6 because Hosea used the singular form of the word “God,” El, whereas the writer of Genesis 6 used the plural form, Elohim. The assumption here is that because these passages do not use precisely the same terms, they are not referring to the same thing. This assumption is incorrect, however, because different words are often used to refer to the same thing. The words El and Elohim are frequently used interchangeably in the Old Testament, and there is no doubt that both passages refer to God. It is not the case, therefore, that “sons of God” always refers to angels. Most advocates of the angels view point to Job 1:6 and 2:1 to support their claim that “sons of God” refers to angels. They argue that since it refers to angels in Job, then it also refers to angels in Genesis 6. In this case the assumption is the opposite of the one above; that is, these passages must refer to the same thing simply because they use the same terms. This is not necessarily true, however. Words or phrases often mean different things or are used differently in different contexts. The phrase “Son of Man,” for example, refers to Ezekiel in the book of Ezekiel, but in the Gospels it refers to Jesus. One must demonstrate from the context of the passages in Genesis and Job that “sons of God” means the same thing in both passages and not simply assume this is the case because the words are the same. The passages in Job are also used to argue that “sons of God” refers to fallen angels. There is nothing in these passages, however, that indicates that they are fallen angels. Job 1:6, for example, says, “the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.”1 Satan was not one of the sons of God, but came in “among them.” In Job, the reference to the “sons of God” does not include fallen angels such as Satan. Additionally, it seems very unlikely that the expression “sons of God” would be used to refer to fallen angels. This argument incorrectly assumes that the two passages are referring to the same thing simply because they use the same terms. Other commentators appeal to Jude 6-7 to support their contention that the “sons of God” were unfallen or heavenly angels who then fell because they had sexual relations with female humans. They argue that Jude compared the prideful fallen angels to the sexually immoral people of Sodom and Gomorrah. The problem with this assertion is that it assumes what it must prove. Proponents of this argument use their interpretation of Genesis 6 to understand Jude, and then use their understanding of Jude to support their interpretation of Genesis 6. This is circular reasoning. The angels view also assumes that angels can have sexual relations with female humans. Bruce Waltke points out, however, “This interpretation…contradicts Jesus’ statement that angels do not marry (Matt. 22:30; Mark 12:25). It is one thing for angels to eat and drink (see Gen. 19:1-3), but quite another to marry and reproduce.”2 Some interpreters respond that Jesus was referring only to the marriage contract and not to the marriage bed, but this makes Jesus’ statement nonsensical in its own context. Jesus was responding to the question about having a marital relation resulting in children, and He clearly denied that heavenly angels can have sexual relations. Other defenders respond that Jesus is referring to angels in heaven, whereas Genesis 6 is referring to fallen angels. The problem with this explanation is that prior to having sexual relations with female humans, these fallen angels must have been unfallen, heavenly angels; but Jesus said heavenly angels could not have sexual relations, and, therefore, they could not have committed the very act that is supposed to have caused them to fall. Furthermore, this view not only assumes that unfallen angels can have sexual relations with female humans but also that it is necessarily sinful. No commentator has attempted to prove this assumption. Dr. Thomas A. Howe Professor of Bible and Biblical Languages, Southern Evangelical Seminary
Thanks for sharing those quotes. Some good points.
@@MasterpieceBible Thanks for the video... and channel.
Why did god not realise she was tricked and forgive them ; bit merciless of him
7:50 İs the serpent female? Why "her" and not "him" or "it"?
Check the video description.
@@MasterpieceBible Ach so! Du bist auch deutschsprachig! 😃 Btw, when İ learned Chris Tomlin's song "İs He worthy" a couple of month ago, there's these line: Does the Father truly love us? (He does) Does the Spirit move among us? İ instinctively responded with "SHE does" because apparently the Holy Spirit has been feminine in my understanding/experience. İ didn't even realize it until İ sang that song. All these year İ've been thinking that way despite der Heilige Geist being grammatically masculine. But then again in my native language there's no grammatical genders whatsoever, not even in the pronouns, and as we know English has such distinction only in the pronouns.
The Good Lord who blessed Solomon with His wisdom...bless you too Sir.. in the same way to understand the depths in God's word... Many many thanks for spreading this message.
in some parts of the bible angels take human form
The treacherous Hezekiah sent his treacherous men in the dark of night and slaughtered 185,000 peacefully returning soldiers while they were sleeping even though they had not fired a single arrow at Jerusalem. What God can accept such, you fanatic? No ridiculous angel of the Lord with a two-edged sword. Your fundamentalism is terrifying, but of course every tongue and every pen speaks in favor of its own owner. You are full of hatred for the Assyrians who gave you Judaism and KhaShem and the language, Ktav Ashurit - "Sennacherib's envoys refused to speak any language but Hebrew with Hezekiah's mediators." So Sennacherib was in Nineveh, and thus Hezekiah and Isaiah are lying.
Jacob didn't "steal" ANYTHING. Esau "sold" his birthright. You have not done your due diligence.
Salute to You, good job 👍
Tell it like it is That’s why society is going down the wrong path No sugar coating
Wenn Adam bereits vorher weise gewesen wäre hätte er den verdammten Apfel nicht gefressen.
Adam hatte mehr Rippen
I love this explanation... spirituality must go together with knowledge of how and why certain things occurred.
If Seth's people married Human women, this would not be unusual. Their genes would be compatible with each other. They wouldn't make a Nephilim. The heavenly beings in heaven didn't reproduce and couldn't create the Nephilim. The Nephilim would only come about by breading with another being outside our planet or the Annonaki ( Those from the heavens or the universe that came down to earth). Their genes wouldn't match the human genes and would create the Nephilim. In other words, we were visited by aliens from another world.
Complex, compacted, deep but also very clear. Thank you for the invitation to look for Jesus.
My pleasure! Good to hear from you.
God/s and his family walked on earth with men that's how they created us in the first place. His sons saw the human women and had children with them not spirits or angels etc...
why is ur book so scripted. ur prophet slept with his daughter. gtfoh
Although not as directly, I see this pattern (Men/wo-men, Question, bring out, goes out, convince, urge, rescue ) as also possibly recurring in several other places: The Garden, Abraham & Isaac, Abraham & The angel of the Lord, Jacob and the angel of the Lord, and ultimately Jesus (as you mentioned). Perhaps it is a recurring theme throughout history: - "Men" (Every human ...Adam=man/woman), - The "Question" of Identity (Son of God, or selfish beast), - Request to "bring out" (choose which side you're on), - The choice / action of "going out", - "Convince/Urge" (Call to repentance), - "Rescue" (by hand - Matt 3:2) before Judgement.
Interesting. It would fit well with the idea that every story is retelling the big story. Thanks for sharing!
I believe 27 will always repent Abraham isaac Jacob .. thought indigenous eyes are not it spot on ...its wilde amazing how their related to Labon family... Indigenous reseving his rights to native sovereign people and family sovereign rights as natives...
Genesis 1: 26-27and 28.already a creation there which John 1:1 confirmed. Genesis 2:7 is the ruler.adam could be a messiah and lord of lord.just because he fall into temptation .second adam came which is call JESUS CHRIST Our savior today. My question is if first adam didn't fall into temptation. Do you think Jesus will come.? and what will adam be.? Thank you. Be spiritual inspired...
Jesus was created before humans, so Adam was not the messiah. In Genesis 2:7 And God formed Man from the dust of the ground , and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. God bless you
Brilliant. You are a very fast speaker..try to slow down a bit...remember you are speaking to some whose first language is not English. Receive this in good spirit. Thanks l was blessed
@@abigailmpofu4210 Appreciate the feedback 👍