Numberphile

Numberphile

Videos about numbers and mathematics. Videos by Brady Haran since 2011.
Our thanks to Jane Street.
Thanks also to SLMath, the Simons Foundation, and our Patreon supporters.

The Hydra Game - Numberphile

The Hydra Game - Numberphile

Pi is Evil - Numberphile

Pi is Evil - Numberphile

Пікірлер

  • @StellarFireflyGaming-rm2xu
    @StellarFireflyGaming-rm2xu20 сағат бұрын

    You've linked the GeoGebra file, but you really should also provide a link to the Python code. I would really like to play around with that version.

  • @Necrozene
    @Necrozene20 сағат бұрын

    Why didn't Hercules chop the body off? That doesn't grow back.

  • @uncletiggermclaren7592
    @uncletiggermclaren759221 сағат бұрын

    Math. A complicated way of making EVEN the Legend of Heracles boring AF.

  • @_-_-_-_-_
    @_-_-_-_-_21 сағат бұрын

    I love this

  • @SDAMIT10M764ib
    @SDAMIT10M764ib21 сағат бұрын

    Ght

  • @darkenblade986
    @darkenblade98621 сағат бұрын

    yay!

  • @microwave221
    @microwave22121 сағат бұрын

    I'm surprised this doesn't attract more attention, if only because it would imply there are trajectories that can flawlessly avoid primes without being a trivial sequence of multiples. If there are numbers that trend to infinity, then the patterns they follow would be another insight into the patterns that primes follow

  • @QuantumPotPie
    @QuantumPotPie21 сағат бұрын

    this feels very similar to the 2n+1/Collatz conjecture

  • @BroMi-fn2ib
    @BroMi-fn2ib21 сағат бұрын

    ❤❤❤❤

  • @roccov3614
    @roccov361421 сағат бұрын

    Infinitesimals might be useful, but infinitesimals are NOT the opposite of infinity. There is nothing larger than infinity. There is nothing smaller than zero. Zero is the opposite of infinity, if that could be defined at all.

  • @Timmmmartin
    @Timmmmartin22 сағат бұрын

    Given that the divisors are paired up and the number itself isn't included, why is 1 always included as a divisor? If it were ignored, the whole theory would change.

  • @sillygoofygoofball
    @sillygoofygoofball22 сағат бұрын

    some of these numberphile videos genuinely shock me to my core well done

  • @Doeniz1
    @Doeniz122 сағат бұрын

    If those truely are counterexamples, so computing power ever will help us recognize them as such, since the sequence would go on foreever. We would have to recognize patterns in the sequence, that let us prove that the sequence has to go on forever.

  • @huffs-by6xq
    @huffs-by6xq22 сағат бұрын

    kon kon shorts dekhe aaya😂😂😂

  • @YuvrajSingh-rd9tw
    @YuvrajSingh-rd9tw20 сағат бұрын

    😂😂

  • @soulfulhouse318
    @soulfulhouse31822 сағат бұрын

    Can you run 318, 273 and 747 for me if bored please!

  • @appa609
    @appa60922 сағат бұрын

    This problem has more structure than it needs

  • @Expo-og3kk
    @Expo-og3kk23 сағат бұрын

    But how?

  • @LeoStaley
    @LeoStaley23 сағат бұрын

    I like to imagine that 276 goes all the way up straight to the first and only odd perfect number, and that number also happens to be the first number to start a loop that disproves the collatz conjecture.

  • @anjaliagnihotri7476
    @anjaliagnihotri747623 сағат бұрын

    Hi

  • @mdoerkse
    @mdoerkse23 сағат бұрын

    138: is that the Bitcoin price chart?

  • @slashloy
    @slashloy23 сағат бұрын

    its not just 276, its all the numbers that are in that graph that are still unknown!

  • @rproyecto
    @rproyecto23 сағат бұрын

    Maybe it is hidden a secret to reveal something great about prime numbers

  • @Little_Man152
    @Little_Man15223 сағат бұрын

    Why

  • @EHMM
    @EHMMКүн бұрын

    30030 is fun

  • @johndoe-sh6bi
    @johndoe-sh6biКүн бұрын

    Is there any money it to solve one of these?

  • @moveabledo
    @moveabledoКүн бұрын

    Back to your true numberphile roots! Integers are cool!

  • @caseytwill
    @caseytwillКүн бұрын

    His mistress has 296

  • @tommoffitt4813
    @tommoffitt4813Күн бұрын

    "So WHO is it with this 296 heart, hmm??"

  • @reubenkriegel7639
    @reubenkriegel7639Күн бұрын

    C is even better than Python.

  • @Bluedog3000
    @Bluedog3000Күн бұрын

    Wouldent it be 49 steps at 18:56?

  • @AbdulHaseeb-me9mh
    @AbdulHaseeb-me9mhКүн бұрын

    Aesa kese ho sakta Hai like comments itne zaida aur views sirf 301 why KZread

  • @a22226565
    @a22226565Күн бұрын

    276 is my stock.

  • @youtubersingingmoments4402
    @youtubersingingmoments4402Күн бұрын

    138 should be called a "Cryptocurrency Number" due to its striking resemblence to a BTC/USD graph.

  • @CatherineKimport
    @CatherineKimportКүн бұрын

    How remarkble would it be if 276 eventually lands on an odd perfect number?

  • @AaronHollander314
    @AaronHollander314Күн бұрын

    log base 10... it's how many digits that number has...it's so simple

  • @ATG19534
    @ATG19534Күн бұрын

    The importance of attacking is to get a card every turn. Card sets cause huge shifts as the game progresses.

  • @lucromel
    @lucromelКүн бұрын

    The next number could be prime! Straight down to 1.

  • @GFkilla17
    @GFkilla17Күн бұрын

    number 138 gives us the prototypical meme coin chart.

  • @shawnfromportland
    @shawnfromportlandКүн бұрын

    How much coffee was this man on

  • @JonKloske
    @JonKloskeКүн бұрын

    This feels like just the collatz conjecture with extra steps! :D

  • @matthewmines5855
    @matthewmines5855Күн бұрын

    Interesting that three of those five unsolved numbers are multiples of 138. (2, 4, and 7?). Is that a recurring thing with the mystery numbers over 1000?

  • @JohnDoe-ti2np
    @JohnDoe-ti2npКүн бұрын

    I first learned about amicable numbers from Martin Gardner's Scientific American article. It is reprinted in his book, "Mathematical Magic Show," in the chapter entitled, "Perfect, Amicable, Sociable." That chapter does not contain the term "aspiring"; this omission may partially explain why so many people (including myself) know the terms "amicable" and "sociable" but not "aspiring."

  • @guru0503p
    @guru0503pКүн бұрын

    Camera work was all over the place towards the end of the video

  • @TimSorbera
    @TimSorberaКүн бұрын

    I spent a few years factoring aliquot sequences with my computer in its spare time. It can be a lot of fun to see the sequences progress and learn the math of the ups and downs as well as the factoring algorithms and tools.

  • @edward6902
    @edward6902Күн бұрын

    6300 + 168 is divisible by seven … no trick required for that one

  • @edward6902
    @edward6902Күн бұрын

    420 + 14 is divisible by seven…. no trick required for that one

  • @TexasEngineer
    @TexasEngineerКүн бұрын

    So what is -0! ?

  • @wesleysays
    @wesleysaysКүн бұрын

    10:40 Sutac silelf.

  • @MaxsonyteOG
    @MaxsonyteOGКүн бұрын

    Does that mean if the aliquot sequence of 276 is a counter-example, there are infinitely many counterexamples, as the infinitely many terms in the aliquot sequence of 276 would also be a counter-example?

  • @hyperbaroque
    @hyperbaroqueКүн бұрын

    I conjecture that these will only run on finitely. You will find longer runs and extraordinarily longer runs, but not one that runs one infinitely with also the characteristic of unpredictable peaks and trends. Therefore, this function will never prove to be a stochastic generator. Therefore, this function is by niche studies excluded from the hyporthetical headers and libraries (ANSI-C, of course,) of seudo-scientific-deity "Roko's Basilisk".