From the latest research and developments in machine learning and natural language processing, to practical applications and the ethical considerations surrounding AI, this channel is your go-to source for all things related to this exciting field. Subscribe now to stay up-to-date on the cutting-edge of AI and join the conversation about the future of intelligence.
[email protected] (For Business Enquiries)
Пікірлер
Terrible discombobulated with an awful script and ten times longer than it needed to be.
There is no such thing. He wants to take over the whole business. If you keep them stupid they will never know bc they didn’t learn.
You have to have a Plus subscription
Evolution must’ve made us prefer dark mode
Why don't you like timestamps?
Just giving up on code all together like that (the saturation thing is very true tho) is like giving up on learning to write even though you can read. I mean you still need people who kow it. And knowing it can help you have better ideas and understandings of things going on as you use AI to improve your life or even creativity. But I would also argue I think AI is going to lead to far more complicated code that most people will not even be able to keep up with or would be like having to learn all over again. But we still need people to try. Hell, we probably are not to much further from, I know Kung Fu, since we have read down and writes looking very possible.
People use the word "Coding" and "Coder" but aren't those really about being a programmer? You learn a few languages and someone hires you to code a program because you know those languages. However programming has been dead for many years. Job Outlook is a publication from the government and has been saying for the past 20 years that programming is job that is expected to grow less quickly than other jobs. Here's the prediction for the next ten years for programmers: Job Outlook, 2022-32 -11% (Decline) But it's been declining for 20 years. This came out probably before all the AI hype. Here's what it says about Web Developers and Digital Designers: Job Outlook, 2022-32 16% (Much faster than average). Here's what it says about Software Developers: Job Outlook, 2022-32 25% (Much faster than average). It's not enough to be a Coder. Far from it. Am I wrong? Is a coder higher up than a programmer? There's no separate article for coders as opposed to programmers. Maybe a degree is necessary and then try and land one of those increasingly shrinking programming jobs and work a few years at that till you can call yourself a software developer and not just a coder and then I guess there will be plenty of jobs. But first you have to be lucky enough to get that programmer job. Or maybe make an app. Or maybe start out doing web development. But now with AI those jobs could be going away too. They probably aren't just talking about coding job layoffs which probably never existed in the first place but the developer jobs. Hate to be negative. I didn't start off this comment with a negative attitude but it just seems that if coding jobs didn't exist then companies are probably laying off developers and engineers.
If Ai ends coding, then "the coders" will make their apps to quickly take over everything else. Once Ai takes over industries, the Programmers will be "programmers" the Lawyers will be "lawyers" and the Doctors will be "doctors" etc... everyone will be nothing more than Verifiers/managers to known knowledge ... the "idea guy" might be new hot profession
You literally didn't include the only thing that matters in this video, which is why the hell 4o doesn't appear in my menu like it does for you.
Nah
Let it write itself
I adopted the use of a mouse as soon as they were invented, and I will use AI as long as it obeys without question.
We as human don't care until we do. The technology has wipe out the empathy because we scroll a lot of information. We have an option, think more as a society and less as individual. Because the tradesman that says you are fuck nerd and I'm king plumber, electrician, HVAC, think again about the flow of money and the goal of the 1% overlords. I think that life always finds its way.
Agi is a pipe dream for now. Well crafted mimics ain't agi. But ya learning to code is going the way of the dodo bird for sure.
Very weak and "diplomatic" video
Do you even code?
Wow, I can build surreal cat images with sunglasses and histogram charts. This is gonna change the world 😂
Ai can’t even develop website
No, you have to prompt it to build a site that does what you want. With good prompts an AI can create a fully functional and unique site in about 30 minutes. If you tell it to copy or model an existing site it will fully crawl all the code, debug what it writes, get it hosted complete with card services, shopping cart, shipping services and insert a decent CS bot, in around 10 minutes. It's amazing to watch.....😮
What’s your special insight? That it’s going to get better? You’re hilarious. You have nothing to add whatsoever to the conversation
ai isn’t the reason why you shouldn’t start coding in 2024, it’s the current anti-junior dev ecosystem. if you don’t have 2-5 years of experience in a specific tech stack, good luck getting a job
Sam Altman sort of scares me. He talks about an AI that acts in the best interests of humanity while ignoring the overfed rhinoceros in the room, who defines what are the best interests of humanity when humanity itself cannot agree on an answer to the question. The only almost universal certainty on this, today, is, Humanity doesn't go extinct." Secondarily humanity might agree almost universally that, "Humanity in general feels it has a congenial reason for each individual's existence." Now ask yourself how can these two be perverted? Is the "solution" to reduce the numbers of humanity to the point they all agree on something more specific? It's a roll of the billion sided dice. Humanity seems to win on big gambles, most of the time. Should we simply roll those dice and trust our luck? Is there a practical alternative? How do you train or control God? {^_^}
The problem is that most people don't know how to prompt for shit. Learn to prompt?
Coding? If anyone can create code it will change the future. AGI not needed
Step 1: The AI shows capability Step 2: The AI assists professionals Step 3: The AI does most of the work, the professionals correct mistakes, jobs reduce Step 4: The AI does many jobs at once, the human is only there for oversight, jobs become very scarce Step 5: The AI does it all, another AI does the oversight, jobs are gone Sorry CS guys, it's over.
Wonder when you can input a prompt that is around a dozen words long and get an entire novel spat out, maybe gpt 6
we will reach AGI by 2028
universal basic income will be really low but it will allow a simple life. Nothing to worry about. You will be the product though
Yeah, Elysium here we come. The rich owns everything on earth, everyone else is dumped in Australia’s waist land desert colonies, with ubi.
I intend to always code because coding is very enjoyable and fun. Very similar to music production, another thing I do alot of. AI can do both of these things better than me but I'll keep doing both because I love to do both. Yes, I know this video is more related to JOBS and I have no answer for that problem, I was a coder all my life but have retired.. looks like just in time. My point is that everyone should keep coding because its a great skill that is rewarding outside of career-based life goals and .. learn to bartend.
Gotta look at who the messenger is when you assess this stuff. He's more likely trying to generate hype and make his company look good to investors than actually knowing what's going to happen in the future with ai. Nothing new here, CEOs been doing it for decades
AI is just an assistant that helps to code faster. A better programmer will achieve better results. As long as the problem that has to be solved is formulated by a human, there will he another human in the loop. AI can be good for the first 90% but most work is needed to finish the last 10% to get the work done. The future for software developers who use AI is bright
I’m not sure if you're being optimistic or if you're underestimating the situation, but this perspective will soon be outdated. Not only will AI quickly reach and surpass our current capabilities, but it is already developing code in ways that are far more efficient and sophisticated than human programmers can achieve in labs. Code that can not even be understood.. AI's rapid advancements in code generation and problem-solving efficiency are proving to be a significant leap forward, far beyond just being an "assistant"... Did you miss the part alone on where only "0.2%" of the coders solved the problem that the AI did? That's the entire context/point of this video.. The point is students learning to code right now, by the time they get jobs (which are saturated already) they will not even be needed. The saturation alone is warning enough to perhaps choose better.
I am pursuing a Bachelor of Science with a major in Computer Science (CS), and I am currently a junior at my university. While coding may significantly change or even become obsolete in the long run, the algorithmic concepts integral to coding will remain, as ‘we’ (humans) still need to understand them to keep control (agency) over the evolution of AI. Furthermore, AI sciences are based on Computer Science and Data science, and Computer science is not just coding by the way. As AI continues to advance, Computer and Data Sciences will become even more central to humanity's ability to maintain agency over its own destiny. In other words, if we lose the need for Computer and Data Sciences, we lose agency over our own destiny 😨. Therefore, I do not see Computer and Data Sciences, or related jobs, going away anytime soon; if anything, they will simply evolve and look different. In my opinion, these sciences will likely fuse into one field: AI sciences and engineering. That is why, after my Bachelor’s degree, I plan to pursue a master’s in AI.
Well I had a chat even with our current A.I. I don't think there is much room for domain experts either, going forwards. So what happens when A.I. can cover every technical and social domain. (doctor, councillor, software developer, mining engineer, hell even wife or husband) All this will achieve, is human understanding will just naturally attrition to zero. (why learn something if a machine has it covered, i.e. ask yourself, can you work an iron forge to make a kitchen knife, of cause not it's covered by a machine) and what humanity is eventually reduced to, out of all of this is just been a biological machine of consumption. If we throw our dominance of intelligence and understanding away to machine, and let them advance humanity... Those advancements, will have stopped been ours and it'll be theirs. Who is going to give the Nvidia GPU a Nobel prize, for the scientific discoveries down the track? What should really upset you is eventually no human will know or understand if it made a discovery, no matter how amazingly aligned with humanity it is.
Gpt for free sucks, i get limitation all the time and cant create images
I don't see gpt4-o as a free user.
Guys it's time to get real. There is not really anything the human intellect will be able to match when AI really hits in 5 years time. Seriously, what is the average person doing for their 70k a year job that is so difficult that AI won't be doing in 5 years? Oh you talk to customers to work out what they want? AI will do that better in 5 years... probably less!
The scary part is, $70k salary doesn't cut it in terms of living above poverty these days.
If AGI is take over the code, in 5 years nobody will even understand the code. You will never understand what is in the code and if that code is doing what is supposed to do. I understand to get help from AI, but if you let the AI to take over the code... bye, bye humans in 50 years maximum.
too late to regret it. Now we need to follow along
Seriously. I just tested Matthew Berman's Snake and ChatGPT-4o spit out perfect python code. I don't know python.
Google's model are a bit trash at the moment especially when using them on real life tasks and coding. They just have a big context window.
Wait, who codes the A.I so it doesn't go rogue or worse be used by authoritarians?
Više puta sam zadavao unikatan zadatak chat-gptu da mi ga riješi i nije znao. AI rješava samo zadatke za koje već ima rješenje.
He said this months ago, and you're re-covering it now... PRETTY PRETTY SHOCKING!
At the moment even new GPT-4o is very average at coding. It even failed to give me a simple formula for a google spreadsheet. Don't get me wrong I want it to be good at coding because coding is boring but I feel like AI companies are starting to hit a wall.
Keep telling yourself that
We about to start saying good by to A lot of jobs coding Is just the beginning.
no point in denying it. Embrace it
Techno-utopian space communism 🚀
The only people who were criticizing this code were software engineers and developers who are feeling existential dread about the career they’ve worked so hard to go into. Natural language is indeed the future of computing. But in the next coming years there’s gonna be a lot of software engineering needed to get us there. Unless you are an advanced software engineer, you’re just not gonna be hired.
Yes the dread is more imminent for software developers, but it actually heralds, the replacement of every other domain, professional or otherwise. Let that sink in. I'm not sure I want to be in that world, and I absolutely do not want that world for our children. A world where any endeavor, scientific discovery, aspiration, hell even creative, arts, music, is taken from them, to a large extent.
@@simonsutton2946 I think creativity will always be part of the human story. AI will allows us to focus on what matters most, that is human to human connection, which I believe will be more important than ever in a world where (hard) labor is automated. I also believe AI can also finally allow us to operate in abundance, but the general public will need to know its inherent worth and value. We deserve a better world, and we always have. UBI is a must.
The gates have already closed, is what you’re saying?
So that’s why they’re not hiring. They only need the experts to build these systems
People hoping for UBI, when the real division between the rich and the poor will begin 😂
NOT learning how to code but learn to 'think' analystically. Why not learn how to code? 1) let AGi take over, as it will not creating vulneraiblity code as the graduates did. The university these days still separate security as seperate major...As long as this is the case, man kind will never stop produce vulenrability and no amount of cyber expert can mitigate the ever-produced new vulnerability codes. 2) Fundamentally, coding IS lousy way for us to interact with computer. We instruct computer what to do using a quasi human like language and translate that into machine code for computer to execute the instruction. For a better human-machine interction, we should just automate that process and using our language to have computer pick up what we want and execute what we want. In other words, human should never do the machine work and let machine handled it themselve. 3) We may still need 'programmable AI' just so that we can better control the controllable AI. But the programmable aspect should be really simple one, not convoluted like the programming language we used today. For the non-programmable sentient AI, we should prepare law and legislation to grant them earth citizen and respect them as one of us as well.
Who wants to control? Or be controlled?! 🤔🤫
Not to point out the obvious, but knocking out software development jobs with AI is about one of the single most technically challenging tasks AI will accomplish. AI will be able to replace a whole lot of other jobs before that -- lawyers, accountants, para-legals, writers, financial analysts, and so many more. If and when AI gets to the point it can replace software engineers, then there will be no need for any engineers whatsoever. No need for petroleum engineers to help design offshore oil platforms, or civil engineers to help plan cities, or material engineers for construction jobs, or chimical engineers, and so on.
If that's the case then AI will lead to global "civil" war. If anyone thinks humans will sit back and take total redundacy without a fight then they are wrong imo.
But there is heaps more readily available high quality data on coding than what there is on the jobs you mentioned, right? :/
is that even real audio, the VoiceOver sounds so processed and weird.
Those two people look generated, lol.
Thanks for sharing