I’m 500 and even I find this stupid. (I actually am 1500+ based on performance, but elo system is stupid, only +8 elo for winning a game)
@thegunnednoob17 сағат бұрын
the bishop hanging:
@trews121 сағат бұрын
Time to question my sanity again then I guess: 0:36 Ah, Damiano's Defense. It is actually very bad, because you can actually sac the knight for the pawn here: *3. Nxe5 fxe5 4. Qh5+ Ke6* 4...g6 would blunder the rook: 5. Qxe5+ and then whatever black does 6.Qxh8 *5. Qxe5+ Kf7 6. Bc4+ d5* Immediate Kg6 would lead to mate in a couple of moves after 7. Qf5+ Kh6 8. h4 Qe7 9. d3+ g5 10. Bxg5+ Kg7 11. Bxe7 Bxe7 12. Qf7+ Kh6 13. g4 d5 14. g5+ Bxg5 15. hxg5+ Kxg5 16. Qg7+ Kf4 17. Qg3# This is with perfect defense of black. Other moves by black lead to quicker mate. After 6...d5 the bishop covers f5, so Qf5+ isn't possible *7. Bxd5+ Kg6 8. h4 h6 9. Bxb7 Bd6* The bishop can't take back on b7 because he has to cover f5. Now after moving the white Queen to b5 (where it still threatens to go to f5) to save it white wins the rook next move. The moral of the story being: Don't move the f-pawn early, if you don't know what you're doing. There are a couple other variants for black, but none of them are good. The best black can do is not take the knight and be down a pawn (but up the tempo, because white has to move the knight again) 3:14 But they don't have to. Could have taken with the knight 4:47 I agree. Giving up control of d4 is a mistake, because it gives the opponent a nice outpost. 5:22 Sometimes you just need luck to win, even if it comes in the form of a bad internet connection. Wait, or did he abandon the game willingly? Game two: 5:50 I'd prefer to block with the knight, developing and preparing to castle swiftly. 7:01 Oopsie... 7:17 The last remaining bishop locked away is not the best situation for sure. Should have gotten him out of there quicker. 7:37 Well, I guess it is true that the side with the second to last mistake wins.
@trews122 сағат бұрын
Hi there. You probably were already wondering where I was. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten about you: 0:25 It's the Queen's Gambit. The main responses against it are dxc4 (Queen's Gambit accepted), e6 (Queen's Gambit declined [QGD]) and c6 (Slav Defense)]. 0:34 On your level (and probably mine too) it is not that important, but this is a slight strategic mistake here. One of the most important resources for black in the Queen's Gambit is the pawn move c5 to attack and undermine the white center. Developing the knight normally here blocks this pawn. Therefore it is better to either wait until you could get c5 in (without blundering that pawn obviously) or develop the knight to d7, where the knight supports the c-pawn once it is pushed. As I said, not so relevant on lower levels, where most games are decided but blunders in the middlegame, but maybe good to keep in mind still. 1:50 and there is the decisive blunder I was talking about that makes these slight mistakes not really important on the beginner level. Good find with the sacrifice. 2:51 This is presenting a problem for your opponent, but much like in real wars it is better to present your enemy a dilemma, because problems have solutions (here it is moving or defending the pawn) while dilemmas force the opponent to choose between two (or more) unpleasant possibilities. So Qg2 instead of Qh5 to attack both the rook and the pawn. After Rf1 you can take the pawn. Second Game: Not much to say here that you didn't already talk about. Stop moving your f-pawn so early. At least until you're a couple hundred elo points higher. Congrats to 100 subs btw even though I'm a bit late to the party, It is almost 150 already.
@traditionalutopianКүн бұрын
one of your videos appeared in my recommended and i cant get enough of them lmao
@IdiotChess1Күн бұрын
@@traditionalutopian thanks and glad u like em 😁
@ivan3230Күн бұрын
as an even lower than 600 elo player this hurts to watch T-T
@globd8625Күн бұрын
indian players up to 1300 always play like this
@ronanconley2595Күн бұрын
This is pretty much how it goes
@JasonMitchellofcompsciКүн бұрын
I too am an idiot. We should play some time.
@IdiotChess1Күн бұрын
Hello fellow idiot 🤣 for sure!
@Tzizenorec2 күн бұрын
It used to be (idk how many years ago) that a Brilliant move was when you briefly played even better than Stockfish. Nowadays it just means you made a move that looked terrible at first glance but was actually kind of good.
@keaton7182 күн бұрын
low elo chess is pure chess
@obiwanfisher5372 күн бұрын
Is that you explaining both sides or are you playing like that?
@IdiotChess12 күн бұрын
I'm playing myself, bumtsipum is my name on chesscom
@obiwanfisher537Күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1 Ah okay, it wasn't exactly clear because you rip on yourself so hard, too lol But fair. We can try and play, I am in a similar bracket.
@IdiotChess1Күн бұрын
@@obiwanfisher537 Yeah it's nothing too serious I just like to joke around 😂. You can add me and we can play sometime for sure !
@caroline76482 күн бұрын
as a 1600 I must say I enjoyed this a lot! I think you had some solid thought processes, some good tactical oversight and you show lots of potential. I think you're gonna be improving fast!
@IdiotChess12 күн бұрын
glad you enjoyed it Caroline! thanks for the positive comment 😁
@SweetDream23462 күн бұрын
This is high quality content
@IdiotChess12 күн бұрын
Thanks !
@ChessMates-nl1wj2 күн бұрын
Brother you are brilliant. Just not at chess, but keep it up! I will share this with all my worst students
@IdiotChess12 күн бұрын
🤣🤣 thanks! Yes, It's probably good to show your students a good example how to NOT play chess.
@baltstop27022 күн бұрын
you're not an idiot just because you're low elo, we all have been there
@LeoLau-ip9bv3 күн бұрын
that guy is higher elo then me man
@MSLChessmemes8462 күн бұрын
What's your rating
@songoku38483 күн бұрын
I'm below 600, I'm a tard
@IdiotChess13 күн бұрын
tards unite 🤝
@BegginerEsp3 күн бұрын
As a 1k elo player, u give me headaches. New sub here!
@IdiotChess13 күн бұрын
Glad you can still enjoy the video even with all the pain I'm causing 🤕. Thanks for the sub!
@BegginerEsp3 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1 Ima show this to my 2k elo father. He might go crazy
@IdiotChess12 күн бұрын
@@BegginerEsp I'm doomed 💀
@BegginerEsp2 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1I will tell u his opinion.Also I can add u if u wana play some chess!
@IdiotChess12 күн бұрын
@@BegginerEsp Sure, I might make some videos in the future playing against subs and stuff if people are interested in something like that 😛
@voquangminhnguyen31933 күн бұрын
4:30 I would be surprised if they knew en passant.
@darkacer.694 күн бұрын
hi brother, you're really good, but if I had to say one weakness, it's a little bit of more tactics and strategic chess, sometimes your moves are "null," meaning it either has no threat, or has one but can be easily avoided, in <1000 elo chess, really doesn't matter, but as you ramp up the elo ranking, you need more opening, middlegame, and endgame knowledge, just a tip, thanks:)
@IdiotChess14 күн бұрын
hello darkacer and thanks for the tip! 😄
@arielaspera95884 күн бұрын
4:04 missed the rook takes knight with check
@kirbydaclan42854 күн бұрын
In all honestly what kind of opponents you getting 😭 mine keeps playing like 1200s in their game rating
@IdiotChess14 күн бұрын
paid actors 🤡
@IcicleiceXD4 күн бұрын
0:36 I am 600 elo and whenever the opponent defense there e5 pawn with the f6 pawn, you need to take the pawn with the Knight (the e5 pawn). And it would be a brilliant move for me whenever I do it, It’s always a brilliant move. If the opponent captures your Knight (with the f6 pawn) put your queen to h5. And it would give a check to the king and you will also attack the e5 pawn. If they block with g7 pawn, take the e5 pawn with your queen. (I will explain later if they move the king.) and you’ll give another check to the king when you take the e5 pawn. And you will fork the king and the rook. If the block with the bishop or queen don’t take it, just take the rook and you’ll be up material. Now I will be explaining if the king moved instead of blocking with the H7 pawn. King goes to E7, take the pawn that’s in e5, you will also give another check. The King will go to F7 (force) And then, after the king moves to F7, move your bishop to c4 another check to the king, and then the king will need to go to g6, (unless they want to lose more material because they can move the pawn to d5 and just lose one point of Material.) after the king moves to g6, put your queen to f5 and well check the black king, The king is forced to go to h6. After the king goes h6, move the d pawn two or one squares. (I recommend going 2 squares.) in case the checkmate fails. Your Bishop will give a check to the king, After that, the black king needs to move the g pawn 2 squares. It is force. And then you need to move the h pawn two squares so this could make the checkmate faster. They can’t take your H pawn because it’s pin to the bishop. Although they could put the bishop to b4. This will give a check to your king, and the best move is to block the check with the c pawn. Black has a illegal king square but instead, they will probably take your c pawn to make the checkmate last longer just take the bishop with your B pawn. You’re up material, but you still need to checkmate the king, it’s very weak and I think the best move is to try to offer a queen trade for black. They will put their queen on F6 Don’t take, and take the pawn on g5. A double check on the king and also a king and queen fork. The king is forced to go to g7. Take the queen with your pawn. Another check to the king. If they take the pawn with to Knight, move your black squared Bishop to h6 and checkmate to the black king, and you win. Almost the same if they move their king to f6, move your black squared Bishop, to a3 they could block with the c pawn but they will lose material. so that is not most likely. So they will move there d pawn to block the check. Your queen got discovered attack since they moved the D pawn. Take the bishop. On c8 and it is checkmate.
@IdiotChess14 күн бұрын
Damn, thanks for this full breakdown on the position. I will definitely (not) remember this next time when they make this mistake and punish them 😎 But I'll try 🤣
@sleepyheadmemes2 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1 it's a fairly common mistake! You are likely to see it again and again. Just remember: F=Fail. Push F pawn to Fail. It opens a direct check from your queen to their king, which can be exploited in many ways
@kirbydaclan42854 күн бұрын
Was it a good idea to take the knight with your rook at 4:00
@IdiotChess14 күн бұрын
Looks free to me 😆. I think that was my original idea when stacking the rooks but that idea disappeared somewhere, not unusual in my games 🙃
@kirbydaclan42854 күн бұрын
Haha same@@IdiotChess1
@misterfister61934 күн бұрын
3:06. I missed it when I first watched this part but you could have taken with your knight to avoid the doubled pawns.
@IdiotChess14 күн бұрын
Ah shiet, that would have been nice actually 🤔
@misterfister61934 күн бұрын
3:24 Idk if it’s the right move, but I would have played Rd6. Puts pressure on the king and lets you play Rad1 later on. I think the king move was a bit too passive and didn’t really accomplish anything.
@plateterminator99944 күн бұрын
my man, there was a knight hanging in thet game for like 2 moves, major strategical oversights and you are worried about a king move?
@misterfister61934 күн бұрын
@@plateterminator9994 I hadn’t gotten to the hanging knight yet.
@ChangTheDestroyerOfficial4 күн бұрын
Put a low pass filter on your mic, NOW!
@IdiotChess14 күн бұрын
Sorry 🤣, I have a new mic now, should be better for the future videos 👍
@pontierent7345 күн бұрын
not trying to be mean, but next time make ur voice a little louder so the music doesnt go over your voice.
@IdiotChess15 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! I'm still a little noobie when it comes to this stuff but I'm trying to improve every vidya 😀
@pontierent7344 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1 not a problem hope things go great :).
@72lucious6 күн бұрын
It is interesting to see chess at lower levels. The good old days of chess. I am at a point where even bullet requires a lot of effort to just to match and outplay your opponent and all the moves being played in 3 seconds max. The rating is 1500. Anyway, you can get higher than 1000 elo, definitely. I got through from 200 elo
@IdiotChess16 күн бұрын
Yeah, I can just blunder couple moves and still make a comeback 😂. Not gonna happen in your elo probably. Thanks for the nice comment!
@unnamed42196 күн бұрын
As a washed 1900 (1500 now 💀) I felt the pain of every move in the first game. Even after you traded the rooks you could’ve blocked the king getting around your pawns and gain time or at least get a draw.
@IdiotChess16 күн бұрын
I'm sorry for making you go through all this... 😵
@SnailBeast8 күн бұрын
1st game wtf was that play from white? 1 e4 e5 2 f4 f6 3 ef ef 4 Qh5+ and black are fucked 2...f6 is the worst move possible in this beginning
@IdiotChess18 күн бұрын
I agree, fcking idiots 🤣 especially that guy playing black, wtf is he doing...
@SnailBeast8 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1 well f6 was the worst move from black side. Idk why white continued like this
@IdiotChess18 күн бұрын
@@SnailBeast Full confused from the shitplay 💩
@batatah9 күн бұрын
Why couldn't he just Qxa5?
@IdiotChess19 күн бұрын
I thought I could fork his king and rook by going knight to c2 if he took the bishop, seems like I accidentally cut out that part of me trying to figure it out on the video 😩
@batatah9 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1 yeah you are right. I am blind
@IdiotChess19 күн бұрын
@@batatah no worries, I usually don't see these either, I was just having good random 1 game I guess 🤣
@Durta_idk4 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1Oooohhh ok, thanks for explaining. I was staring at my screen so confused, but now I understand it really was a brilliant move!
@sam27254 күн бұрын
@@IdiotChess1The fork would probably only lead to an equal position, but b6 is a nice queen trap which is why it was marked as brilliant
@oupwo74689 күн бұрын
KEEP THE GOOD WORK By the way, the brilliant move thing is sometimes a bit broken. I had one for a sequence both me and my oponent saw and my oponent (who got the sacred move) lost few moves afterwards.
@amaryllis09 күн бұрын
Why play without increment? Increment means you don't have to worry about time as much. You still have to manage it, but it's not an auto loss if you run out, you just run into a buffer of a few seconds Much easier to get better if time has some renewability to it and you're not burning it every second you spend thinking
@IdiotChess19 күн бұрын
I like the idea that it's auto loss when you run out of time. I've never enjoyed playing with increment idk why. Prolly bcs it's more intense I guess 😅 but like you said probably not the best for learning and becoming better...
@matwith2teas9 күн бұрын
I don't know if he saw his bishop was hanging, but I'd taken it's a fork, that's why it was brilliant
@formerlyknownaseasrob9 күн бұрын
Yes, it’s a check-rook fork
@letsmakeit11010 күн бұрын
It makes me uncomfortable how pop culture equates being good at chess with being smart. I was at the bar the other day and this bloke was doing card tricks in front of me. Blew my mind he'd obviously been honing this for years. But nobody's going to be like 'wow this guy's really smart look at these card tricks.' 'I tried to do a top cut but i messed up i guess im too dumb.'
@rapidtechhelp45089 күн бұрын
Yes, doing card tricks (requires sleight of hand and experience) and playing a game that requires high intelligence and logical thinking are exactly the same thing. I hate pop culture also but i dont think you are right
@letsmakeit1109 күн бұрын
@@rapidtechhelp4508 the point is that chess requires experience more than anything else theres a reason every grandmaster started when they were children. nakamura has an average iq
@blobthekat10 күн бұрын
_"If you don't know what you are doing, then neither does your enemy"_ - Sun Tzu, The Art of War
@IdiotChess110 күн бұрын
facts
@lshadowSFX10 күн бұрын
since you had a pretty good first game i can tell your problem is not that you are horrible at chess but your impatience, I can clearly see that you get lazy mid way of the thinking and take the worst possible choice that wasn´t even in line with your previous line of thought lol
@IdiotChess110 күн бұрын
Yeah, sounds pretty accurate... ADHD kicking in or something 🙃
Пікірлер
I’m 500 and even I find this stupid. (I actually am 1500+ based on performance, but elo system is stupid, only +8 elo for winning a game)
the bishop hanging:
Time to question my sanity again then I guess: 0:36 Ah, Damiano's Defense. It is actually very bad, because you can actually sac the knight for the pawn here: *3. Nxe5 fxe5 4. Qh5+ Ke6* 4...g6 would blunder the rook: 5. Qxe5+ and then whatever black does 6.Qxh8 *5. Qxe5+ Kf7 6. Bc4+ d5* Immediate Kg6 would lead to mate in a couple of moves after 7. Qf5+ Kh6 8. h4 Qe7 9. d3+ g5 10. Bxg5+ Kg7 11. Bxe7 Bxe7 12. Qf7+ Kh6 13. g4 d5 14. g5+ Bxg5 15. hxg5+ Kxg5 16. Qg7+ Kf4 17. Qg3# This is with perfect defense of black. Other moves by black lead to quicker mate. After 6...d5 the bishop covers f5, so Qf5+ isn't possible *7. Bxd5+ Kg6 8. h4 h6 9. Bxb7 Bd6* The bishop can't take back on b7 because he has to cover f5. Now after moving the white Queen to b5 (where it still threatens to go to f5) to save it white wins the rook next move. The moral of the story being: Don't move the f-pawn early, if you don't know what you're doing. There are a couple other variants for black, but none of them are good. The best black can do is not take the knight and be down a pawn (but up the tempo, because white has to move the knight again) 3:14 But they don't have to. Could have taken with the knight 4:47 I agree. Giving up control of d4 is a mistake, because it gives the opponent a nice outpost. 5:22 Sometimes you just need luck to win, even if it comes in the form of a bad internet connection. Wait, or did he abandon the game willingly? Game two: 5:50 I'd prefer to block with the knight, developing and preparing to castle swiftly. 7:01 Oopsie... 7:17 The last remaining bishop locked away is not the best situation for sure. Should have gotten him out of there quicker. 7:37 Well, I guess it is true that the side with the second to last mistake wins.
Hi there. You probably were already wondering where I was. Don't worry, I haven't forgotten about you: 0:25 It's the Queen's Gambit. The main responses against it are dxc4 (Queen's Gambit accepted), e6 (Queen's Gambit declined [QGD]) and c6 (Slav Defense)]. 0:34 On your level (and probably mine too) it is not that important, but this is a slight strategic mistake here. One of the most important resources for black in the Queen's Gambit is the pawn move c5 to attack and undermine the white center. Developing the knight normally here blocks this pawn. Therefore it is better to either wait until you could get c5 in (without blundering that pawn obviously) or develop the knight to d7, where the knight supports the c-pawn once it is pushed. As I said, not so relevant on lower levels, where most games are decided but blunders in the middlegame, but maybe good to keep in mind still. 1:50 and there is the decisive blunder I was talking about that makes these slight mistakes not really important on the beginner level. Good find with the sacrifice. 2:51 This is presenting a problem for your opponent, but much like in real wars it is better to present your enemy a dilemma, because problems have solutions (here it is moving or defending the pawn) while dilemmas force the opponent to choose between two (or more) unpleasant possibilities. So Qg2 instead of Qh5 to attack both the rook and the pawn. After Rf1 you can take the pawn. Second Game: Not much to say here that you didn't already talk about. Stop moving your f-pawn so early. At least until you're a couple hundred elo points higher. Congrats to 100 subs btw even though I'm a bit late to the party, It is almost 150 already.
one of your videos appeared in my recommended and i cant get enough of them lmao
@@traditionalutopian thanks and glad u like em 😁
as an even lower than 600 elo player this hurts to watch T-T
indian players up to 1300 always play like this
This is pretty much how it goes
I too am an idiot. We should play some time.
Hello fellow idiot 🤣 for sure!
It used to be (idk how many years ago) that a Brilliant move was when you briefly played even better than Stockfish. Nowadays it just means you made a move that looked terrible at first glance but was actually kind of good.
low elo chess is pure chess
Is that you explaining both sides or are you playing like that?
I'm playing myself, bumtsipum is my name on chesscom
@@IdiotChess1 Ah okay, it wasn't exactly clear because you rip on yourself so hard, too lol But fair. We can try and play, I am in a similar bracket.
@@obiwanfisher537 Yeah it's nothing too serious I just like to joke around 😂. You can add me and we can play sometime for sure !
as a 1600 I must say I enjoyed this a lot! I think you had some solid thought processes, some good tactical oversight and you show lots of potential. I think you're gonna be improving fast!
glad you enjoyed it Caroline! thanks for the positive comment 😁
This is high quality content
Thanks !
Brother you are brilliant. Just not at chess, but keep it up! I will share this with all my worst students
🤣🤣 thanks! Yes, It's probably good to show your students a good example how to NOT play chess.
you're not an idiot just because you're low elo, we all have been there
that guy is higher elo then me man
What's your rating
I'm below 600, I'm a tard
tards unite 🤝
As a 1k elo player, u give me headaches. New sub here!
Glad you can still enjoy the video even with all the pain I'm causing 🤕. Thanks for the sub!
@@IdiotChess1 Ima show this to my 2k elo father. He might go crazy
@@BegginerEsp I'm doomed 💀
@@IdiotChess1I will tell u his opinion.Also I can add u if u wana play some chess!
@@BegginerEsp Sure, I might make some videos in the future playing against subs and stuff if people are interested in something like that 😛
4:30 I would be surprised if they knew en passant.
hi brother, you're really good, but if I had to say one weakness, it's a little bit of more tactics and strategic chess, sometimes your moves are "null," meaning it either has no threat, or has one but can be easily avoided, in <1000 elo chess, really doesn't matter, but as you ramp up the elo ranking, you need more opening, middlegame, and endgame knowledge, just a tip, thanks:)
hello darkacer and thanks for the tip! 😄
4:04 missed the rook takes knight with check
In all honestly what kind of opponents you getting 😭 mine keeps playing like 1200s in their game rating
paid actors 🤡
0:36 I am 600 elo and whenever the opponent defense there e5 pawn with the f6 pawn, you need to take the pawn with the Knight (the e5 pawn). And it would be a brilliant move for me whenever I do it, It’s always a brilliant move. If the opponent captures your Knight (with the f6 pawn) put your queen to h5. And it would give a check to the king and you will also attack the e5 pawn. If they block with g7 pawn, take the e5 pawn with your queen. (I will explain later if they move the king.) and you’ll give another check to the king when you take the e5 pawn. And you will fork the king and the rook. If the block with the bishop or queen don’t take it, just take the rook and you’ll be up material. Now I will be explaining if the king moved instead of blocking with the H7 pawn. King goes to E7, take the pawn that’s in e5, you will also give another check. The King will go to F7 (force) And then, after the king moves to F7, move your bishop to c4 another check to the king, and then the king will need to go to g6, (unless they want to lose more material because they can move the pawn to d5 and just lose one point of Material.) after the king moves to g6, put your queen to f5 and well check the black king, The king is forced to go to h6. After the king goes h6, move the d pawn two or one squares. (I recommend going 2 squares.) in case the checkmate fails. Your Bishop will give a check to the king, After that, the black king needs to move the g pawn 2 squares. It is force. And then you need to move the h pawn two squares so this could make the checkmate faster. They can’t take your H pawn because it’s pin to the bishop. Although they could put the bishop to b4. This will give a check to your king, and the best move is to block the check with the c pawn. Black has a illegal king square but instead, they will probably take your c pawn to make the checkmate last longer just take the bishop with your B pawn. You’re up material, but you still need to checkmate the king, it’s very weak and I think the best move is to try to offer a queen trade for black. They will put their queen on F6 Don’t take, and take the pawn on g5. A double check on the king and also a king and queen fork. The king is forced to go to g7. Take the queen with your pawn. Another check to the king. If they take the pawn with to Knight, move your black squared Bishop to h6 and checkmate to the black king, and you win. Almost the same if they move their king to f6, move your black squared Bishop, to a3 they could block with the c pawn but they will lose material. so that is not most likely. So they will move there d pawn to block the check. Your queen got discovered attack since they moved the D pawn. Take the bishop. On c8 and it is checkmate.
Damn, thanks for this full breakdown on the position. I will definitely (not) remember this next time when they make this mistake and punish them 😎 But I'll try 🤣
@@IdiotChess1 it's a fairly common mistake! You are likely to see it again and again. Just remember: F=Fail. Push F pawn to Fail. It opens a direct check from your queen to their king, which can be exploited in many ways
Was it a good idea to take the knight with your rook at 4:00
Looks free to me 😆. I think that was my original idea when stacking the rooks but that idea disappeared somewhere, not unusual in my games 🙃
Haha same@@IdiotChess1
3:06. I missed it when I first watched this part but you could have taken with your knight to avoid the doubled pawns.
Ah shiet, that would have been nice actually 🤔
3:24 Idk if it’s the right move, but I would have played Rd6. Puts pressure on the king and lets you play Rad1 later on. I think the king move was a bit too passive and didn’t really accomplish anything.
my man, there was a knight hanging in thet game for like 2 moves, major strategical oversights and you are worried about a king move?
@@plateterminator9994 I hadn’t gotten to the hanging knight yet.
Put a low pass filter on your mic, NOW!
Sorry 🤣, I have a new mic now, should be better for the future videos 👍
not trying to be mean, but next time make ur voice a little louder so the music doesnt go over your voice.
Thanks for the feedback! I'm still a little noobie when it comes to this stuff but I'm trying to improve every vidya 😀
@@IdiotChess1 not a problem hope things go great :).
It is interesting to see chess at lower levels. The good old days of chess. I am at a point where even bullet requires a lot of effort to just to match and outplay your opponent and all the moves being played in 3 seconds max. The rating is 1500. Anyway, you can get higher than 1000 elo, definitely. I got through from 200 elo
Yeah, I can just blunder couple moves and still make a comeback 😂. Not gonna happen in your elo probably. Thanks for the nice comment!
As a washed 1900 (1500 now 💀) I felt the pain of every move in the first game. Even after you traded the rooks you could’ve blocked the king getting around your pawns and gain time or at least get a draw.
I'm sorry for making you go through all this... 😵
1st game wtf was that play from white? 1 e4 e5 2 f4 f6 3 ef ef 4 Qh5+ and black are fucked 2...f6 is the worst move possible in this beginning
I agree, fcking idiots 🤣 especially that guy playing black, wtf is he doing...
@@IdiotChess1 well f6 was the worst move from black side. Idk why white continued like this
@@SnailBeast Full confused from the shitplay 💩
Why couldn't he just Qxa5?
I thought I could fork his king and rook by going knight to c2 if he took the bishop, seems like I accidentally cut out that part of me trying to figure it out on the video 😩
@@IdiotChess1 yeah you are right. I am blind
@@batatah no worries, I usually don't see these either, I was just having good random 1 game I guess 🤣
@@IdiotChess1Oooohhh ok, thanks for explaining. I was staring at my screen so confused, but now I understand it really was a brilliant move!
@@IdiotChess1The fork would probably only lead to an equal position, but b6 is a nice queen trap which is why it was marked as brilliant
KEEP THE GOOD WORK By the way, the brilliant move thing is sometimes a bit broken. I had one for a sequence both me and my oponent saw and my oponent (who got the sacred move) lost few moves afterwards.
Why play without increment? Increment means you don't have to worry about time as much. You still have to manage it, but it's not an auto loss if you run out, you just run into a buffer of a few seconds Much easier to get better if time has some renewability to it and you're not burning it every second you spend thinking
I like the idea that it's auto loss when you run out of time. I've never enjoyed playing with increment idk why. Prolly bcs it's more intense I guess 😅 but like you said probably not the best for learning and becoming better...
I don't know if he saw his bishop was hanging, but I'd taken it's a fork, that's why it was brilliant
Yes, it’s a check-rook fork
It makes me uncomfortable how pop culture equates being good at chess with being smart. I was at the bar the other day and this bloke was doing card tricks in front of me. Blew my mind he'd obviously been honing this for years. But nobody's going to be like 'wow this guy's really smart look at these card tricks.' 'I tried to do a top cut but i messed up i guess im too dumb.'
Yes, doing card tricks (requires sleight of hand and experience) and playing a game that requires high intelligence and logical thinking are exactly the same thing. I hate pop culture also but i dont think you are right
@@rapidtechhelp4508 the point is that chess requires experience more than anything else theres a reason every grandmaster started when they were children. nakamura has an average iq
_"If you don't know what you are doing, then neither does your enemy"_ - Sun Tzu, The Art of War
facts
since you had a pretty good first game i can tell your problem is not that you are horrible at chess but your impatience, I can clearly see that you get lazy mid way of the thinking and take the worst possible choice that wasn´t even in line with your previous line of thought lol
Yeah, sounds pretty accurate... ADHD kicking in or something 🙃
Great video! You got a new sub
Thank youu!