Roof, roof, the roof is on fire… Drones kill tanks through weak top armor. So, is lighter really better? Active protection systems are a must. Modular electronic jamming systems as well. So are interactive communications with the other elements on the battlefield. This will enable tanks to engage in long range indirect fires, blurring the roles of tanks and SP artillery. That implies a bigger better protected vehicle, able to fire standard artillery sized rounds, think 155mm. Electric transmission is good too. Battery backup would allow fording of rivers. Find a crossing spot with good bottom, shut down the air breathing motor, seal it up, run it across under battery power, no matter how deep. Ok, maybe not the Congo or the Amazon, but you get the drift.
@owbvbsteve6 сағат бұрын
no commentary on what its equipped with?
@FarmerDrew10 сағат бұрын
Put me in one of these Strykers and let me go to town! If it flies, it dies, my guys!
@stratfordqbiswas85311 сағат бұрын
India should steer clear of this jet at the extreme price. It will be completely outdated in about five years. India should buy only two squadron of SU57 or F35. Tejas MK1 and MK2 are as good as Rafale and most importantly the money spent will stay in India and help the economy!! Besides India already has Rafales. Indian HAL should incorporate all the Rafale features on Tejas MK1 and MK2 and make them better than Rafale. Why to make France richer? In this instance India should copy China.
@Alex-no1rb12 сағат бұрын
Дай
@BdogFinal1412 сағат бұрын
The SGT. York didn’t have advanced programmable ammunition and the fire control couldn’t lock on to certain airborne fast movers. These newer systems improve upon the 35 and 40mm systems, making them the most cost effective against today’s drone threats. Each round may cost $1000+, it’s still cheaper than a $100,000+ missile.
@mostsacredstories15 сағат бұрын
I love how the modern Bofors looks just like the old one, just mounted on modern carriage. What's up with their love affair with the flared musket end? There some advantage to that style barrel end?
@jhdix673115 сағат бұрын
I'm not sure about the title. Why would the RAF Eurofighter be more deadly than the versions flown by Germany and Spain? The capablities of Leonardo's ECRS Mk.2 are not that much different from Hensoldt's Captor-E upgrade.
@vladimirtrifunovic936716 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@g3roingrimm7917 сағат бұрын
Stahl auf der Heide :)
@TeraQuad17 сағат бұрын
@1:12 Those are not anti-tank guided missile launchers. Those are smoke launchers, or best drone launchers.
@Husky_Passion18 сағат бұрын
serait mieux d'inventer un camion qui balance un swarm de drones avec IA. Ou un missile qui incorpore ceci
@eltiburonson18 сағат бұрын
More game changer, everything from that side is superior but when it is coming to the battlefield beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
@Alsayid18 сағат бұрын
How many guns can be linked to that Giraffe radar?
@Vaeleagle20 сағат бұрын
Interesting Demonstrator.
@td646020 сағат бұрын
Somewhat questionable for the following reasons: 1) No radar solution on the vehicle. 2) What is the # of ammunition in reserve and how quick is it to reload? IMO the entire point of one of these "gun on civilian truck" systems ought to be the ability to operate independently for long periods of time. Food and water for the crew in the cab, maybe a sleeping cot behind the seats. 3) What is the protection in the cab? Can the system be fully operated from inside the cab? 4) Where is the APS? Low flying drones can still be a threat to this thing, a 40mm cannot tackle tiny suicide drones flying close to the ground.
@denarjan20 сағат бұрын
Well Britain is getting closer and closer to bankruptcy so we'll better get used to seeing Toyota Hy-lux with anti aircraft guns mounted on the back of the trucks. It's the way of the future. It's the way of allies of the United States apparently. Hell maybe we in Europe are going to see the return of the religious wars era, Evangelicals vs the non-believers. Who knows. Wouldn't be surprised, US policies have become so insane, a greater appeal will have to be made to our inner psyche to continue bolstering support. So it's the all seeing eye of god again after failing to do it with CCTV.
@aestradarespeto21 сағат бұрын
Have you ever seen a M247 Sgt York Division Air Defense (DIVAD) System? It was developed in lates 70´s and was cancelled. Gepard 35 mm twin Oerlikon system was also retired, but having a new life in Ukraine against drones.
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm22 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm22 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm22 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm22 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm22 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm22 сағат бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@pitmarkovic4545Күн бұрын
Their it's possible to change the barrel in under 1,5 hour to change from 120mm to 140mm or downsizing that is insane and the right direction but I didn't think the future MGS project to that Time Tanks on modern Battlefield not more necessary in future
@haakonsteinsvaag22 сағат бұрын
Tanks will always be needed to support other ground troops. There will always be an arms race between tank protection and anti tank weapons. At the moment the anti tank weapons in the form of drones are leading, but this will go back and forth for an eternity. Infantry alone can not mount an effective offensive, they will always need support.
@perryallan3524Күн бұрын
There is actually nothing unusual about the size and tonnage when compared to past heavy cruisers: The US Alaska Class cruisers built for WW II weighed in at about 30,000 tons; and the design was to specifically counter German pocket battleships and Japanese heavy cruisers. The Worcester Class (built after WW II) came in at about 18,000 tons fully loaded. Light cruisers typically came in about half (or less) of these tonnage. It's going to depend on the weaponry and defenses mounted on the ships to determine if these larger than normal current cruisers worldwide makes sense long term.
@marccouasnon6973Күн бұрын
La même tourelle sera adaptée sur les "Leclerc", en attendant la relève.
@0marginal0Күн бұрын
Copy of Turkish Kizilelma.
@ENGBriseBКүн бұрын
That's not how the future Tempest will look like. Very old photo the cockpit want be as raised at the front. And want look like as shown. Obviously.
@AchwaqKhalidКүн бұрын
Can it be mounted on the *BOXER* ❓
@user-lx5qf3rd2hКүн бұрын
This is a copy of the Serbian 40mm Pasars-16. The Serbian one is better. There are 4 types of missiles
@SonsOfLorgar23 сағат бұрын
Wrong. Pasars is a copy of the original Bofors TRIDON project that this TRIDON *Mk2* is a development of.
@user-lx5qf3rd2h19 сағат бұрын
@@SonsOfLorgar The Serbian Pasars 16 is better than this one. Both the vehicle and the turret are armored. It is also very small. It shows a higher level of technology. It can be equipped with 4 types of air defense missiles and even 2 anti-tank missiles.
@wandahelmer1038Күн бұрын
Made in USA 10,000 dollars a round any other country 1000.00 dollars a rd. Just thinking out loud. Corruption out of Our military industrial complex.
@vladimirtrifunovic9367Күн бұрын
Serbian PASARS is first....🙂
@SonsOfLorgar23 сағат бұрын
Not even close...😂
@vladimirtrifunovic936723 сағат бұрын
@@SonsOfLorgar Cry like a bitch 🙂
@fergusontimothy71Күн бұрын
Well if they are putting an autoloader in it maybe put a 140 mm or 150 mm gun in it
@jg2072Күн бұрын
How many can you deliver to Ukraine in 48hours. That's the marketing mark.
@kjererrrt238122 сағат бұрын
who's paying?
@JuandediosEspinoza-mg5rbКүн бұрын
Muy bien
@H.A.BleikampКүн бұрын
I'm so sorry,but americans can Not doa commercial
@jayceparkin959Күн бұрын
hide it hide it
@AdurianJКүн бұрын
The reason its mk2 is that Tridon was developed but not bought in the 90s
@SonsOfLorgarКүн бұрын
Iirc, it was used by the Costal Artillery branch for a few years until the whole branch was disbanded and resuced to just a single Amphibious infantry regiment.
@kjererrrt2381Күн бұрын
i'd take the russian pantsyr-2 any time.
@SonsOfLorgarКүн бұрын
Are you sure? It's track records sure is less than stellar😂
@kjererrrt2381Күн бұрын
@@SonsOfLorgar it's way better than anything nato has.
@SonsOfLorgar23 сағат бұрын
@@kjererrrt2381 except it's failures in Ukraine that shows it can't even do what it was designed for 🤣🤡
@kjererrrt238123 сағат бұрын
@@SonsOfLorgar except most part of the uke energy generation system has been destroyed. except uke males are hunted down by the draftsmen and afraid of going outside.
@stratfordqbiswas853Күн бұрын
Rafale is only 4.5 gen fighter jet that is totally unproven except in the cyber world. The fact of the matter is it is not battle -proven fighter jet like F16, F35, Sukhoi or Mig etc. It could be as great as its advertisements or NOT. No one knows!!
@jeromeportier4914Күн бұрын
Totally unproven? What are you on about? They’ve flown combat missions in Iraq, in Libya, in Mali. They’re definitely more battle proven than the F-35, arguably as much as the Mig-29 or Sukhoi 27…
@stratfordqbiswas853Күн бұрын
@@jeromeportier4914 Iraq Libya Mali are no military power to demonstrate fighter skills. It will not last against F35, Su57 and J20. Add that to the huge cost, it is not a viable fighter jet for India.
@jeromeportier4914Күн бұрын
@@stratfordqbiswas853 So which one is it? Is it unproven, or not fit to face more modern jets, or too expensive? Or the three? First it is combat proven. Yes, IS and Libya were not peer adversaries, but who have the Mig-29s fought and come on top? Who have the Su-27 fought? In the 4.5gen, it is the most combat proven jet. Will it last against an F-35? It does not matter, because they will never face each other. How will it fare against a Su-57? Who knows? The Su-57 is totally combat unproven. Its real capabilities are unknown. And we don't even know if Russia will manage to produce it in numbers. The J-20 is a more interesting match. It also totally unproven, but it's almost 20 years younger, so it's not surprising it could be more than a match. But it has engine issues. And the Rafale is regularly modernised, so could have the upper hand in some areas, for example EW. Regarding the cost... The Rafale is expensive, but so are every 4.5 and 5th gen aircrafts. It is cheaper than the Eurofighter, arguably cheaper than the F-35... But whether it is or not does not matter since India is not getting the F-35 anyway.
@stratfordqbiswas85321 сағат бұрын
@@jeromeportier4914 All of these. France with help from India created a big hype!!
@jeromeportier491421 сағат бұрын
@@stratfordqbiswas853 You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about!!! Before the Rafale, the Mirage 2000 was already an incredible aircraft, on par with the F-16 in his hay days, and even better in some areas. The Mirage 4000 showed Dassault could improve the design even further, and the Rafale improved on the design again. In 2000 it promised a lot but was a bit raw, lacking integration of several systems and confined to air-to-air missions, but already promising. By 2011 it was mature though, and surprised a lot of people by flying missions in Libya without NATO support (they flew the day before the U.S. and UK came) and without EW support. That’s where the hype came from. Real combat missions. India only came after.
@jazmaj6417Күн бұрын
Serbian pasars air defense is king in that area
@SonsOfLorgarКүн бұрын
It's an upgrade of the same thing...
@jazmaj641716 сағат бұрын
@@SonsOfLorgar true but high more sophisticated and way better armed for now
@user-lx5qf3rd2h5 сағат бұрын
I used to doubt whether Serbia's design was outdated, but the appearance of MK2 yesterday proved that Pasars16 is still valuable.
@aramisone7198Күн бұрын
Dont know if the Serbian has day/night camera.
@user-lx5qf3rd2hКүн бұрын
Serbia has it. It uses a French thermal imager and is integrated with the French Mistral 3+ air defense missile.
@HayMaker-tv2dmКүн бұрын
The CTA international cannon is the best new auto Cannon in the world right now the ammo is great reduced by almost half the size of current 40mm case ammo! And i hope that the Italian ideas of developing a HVC 60mm cannon with IMI, actually is already developed but they will never enter mass prodution and is superior to the majority of cannons now a days even the Mark 110 57mm the 60mm HVC cannon is capable of defeating almost any body armour at 1500meters and can reach easily 8km max range, but NATO needs is a lighter 76mm light towed howitzer that weights a ton or with wheels and carriage, and start to produce the DRACO armoured IFV version with a 76mm/L62 cannon in a fast IFV with all the types of ammo around the globe would be a great weapon for troop support worked fine in the WW 1 in the French and allied armies and others and will worked fine right now, and NATO needs a 127mm/L58 light towed howitzer with a great range of ammo already in mass prodution and capable of hiting targets at more than 30km to rival the russians 122mm and 130 D-30 cannon that is one of the best worldwide period, why NATO dont start to develop new improve solutions and a more heavier mortar of 166mm and a 40 to 50 kilo rounds that can create true devastation, things have to evolve in WW 2 was develop more weapons that in the latest 85 years its ridicolous, military industrial complex is always great for any economy the Americans now it and the Russians now it to, Europe is the ones who failed to understand and they praticly invented war
@sem_kossКүн бұрын
Why don't the drones move? Questionable air defense!!!
@deki5510Күн бұрын
Serbia produce even better, much better for the 10 years
@robertklimczak5630Күн бұрын
Jezeli strzela w ruchu to ok . Jezeli nie to slabo.
@StefanBlagojevicКүн бұрын
Serbian PASARS-16 brought me here.
@user-ey1ok6ms9rКүн бұрын
Дрон может подлететь от куда угодно и уничтожить. Нету пока лекарства от дронов. 😮 в интересное время живём
@Mercurial.RadianceКүн бұрын
Why not make these systems into a Articulated Lorry. Put it on a trailer so a truck can just pull it, drop it off & pick it up. the Driver can leave the system and seek cover. Keep distance from the system which is bound to be attacked.
@jackdburКүн бұрын
I think it is displayed as a palletised system that looks like the whole gun & power pack is a drop able platform.
@antonmorgan1429Күн бұрын
It can its looks like a drop vehicle to me
@christoffermonikander2200Күн бұрын
*All other arms manufacturers in the world:* _"This is our newly designed combat vehicle and weapons system, with next gen capabilities and all kinds of fancy gadgets. "_ *BAE Systems:* _"We put gun on truck. We put cannon on dump-truck. We put radar on car."_
@b.benjamineriksson6030Күн бұрын
If it works it works
@denarjan20 сағат бұрын
Well Britain is getting closer and closer to bankruptcy so we'll better get used to seeing Toyota Hy-lux with anti aircraft guns mounted on the back of the trucks. It's the way of the future. It's the way of allies of the United States apparently. Hell maybe we in Europe are going to see the return of the religious wars era, Evangelicals vs the non-believers. Who knows. Wouldn't be surprised, US policies have become some insane, a greater appeal will have to be made to our inner psyche to continue bolstering support. So it's the all seeing eye of god again after failing to do it with CCTV.
Пікірлер
любое действие имеет противодействие
16 x Lighte Speed Rote Quadrat
Roof, roof, the roof is on fire… Drones kill tanks through weak top armor. So, is lighter really better? Active protection systems are a must. Modular electronic jamming systems as well. So are interactive communications with the other elements on the battlefield. This will enable tanks to engage in long range indirect fires, blurring the roles of tanks and SP artillery. That implies a bigger better protected vehicle, able to fire standard artillery sized rounds, think 155mm. Electric transmission is good too. Battery backup would allow fording of rivers. Find a crossing spot with good bottom, shut down the air breathing motor, seal it up, run it across under battery power, no matter how deep. Ok, maybe not the Congo or the Amazon, but you get the drift.
no commentary on what its equipped with?
Put me in one of these Strykers and let me go to town! If it flies, it dies, my guys!
India should steer clear of this jet at the extreme price. It will be completely outdated in about five years. India should buy only two squadron of SU57 or F35. Tejas MK1 and MK2 are as good as Rafale and most importantly the money spent will stay in India and help the economy!! Besides India already has Rafales. Indian HAL should incorporate all the Rafale features on Tejas MK1 and MK2 and make them better than Rafale. Why to make France richer? In this instance India should copy China.
Дай
The SGT. York didn’t have advanced programmable ammunition and the fire control couldn’t lock on to certain airborne fast movers. These newer systems improve upon the 35 and 40mm systems, making them the most cost effective against today’s drone threats. Each round may cost $1000+, it’s still cheaper than a $100,000+ missile.
I love how the modern Bofors looks just like the old one, just mounted on modern carriage. What's up with their love affair with the flared musket end? There some advantage to that style barrel end?
I'm not sure about the title. Why would the RAF Eurofighter be more deadly than the versions flown by Germany and Spain? The capablities of Leonardo's ECRS Mk.2 are not that much different from Hensoldt's Captor-E upgrade.
😂😂😂😂
Stahl auf der Heide :)
@1:12 Those are not anti-tank guided missile launchers. Those are smoke launchers, or best drone launchers.
serait mieux d'inventer un camion qui balance un swarm de drones avec IA. Ou un missile qui incorpore ceci
More game changer, everything from that side is superior but when it is coming to the battlefield beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
How many guns can be linked to that Giraffe radar?
Interesting Demonstrator.
Somewhat questionable for the following reasons: 1) No radar solution on the vehicle. 2) What is the # of ammunition in reserve and how quick is it to reload? IMO the entire point of one of these "gun on civilian truck" systems ought to be the ability to operate independently for long periods of time. Food and water for the crew in the cab, maybe a sleeping cot behind the seats. 3) What is the protection in the cab? Can the system be fully operated from inside the cab? 4) Where is the APS? Low flying drones can still be a threat to this thing, a 40mm cannot tackle tiny suicide drones flying close to the ground.
Well Britain is getting closer and closer to bankruptcy so we'll better get used to seeing Toyota Hy-lux with anti aircraft guns mounted on the back of the trucks. It's the way of the future. It's the way of allies of the United States apparently. Hell maybe we in Europe are going to see the return of the religious wars era, Evangelicals vs the non-believers. Who knows. Wouldn't be surprised, US policies have become so insane, a greater appeal will have to be made to our inner psyche to continue bolstering support. So it's the all seeing eye of god again after failing to do it with CCTV.
Have you ever seen a M247 Sgt York Division Air Defense (DIVAD) System? It was developed in lates 70´s and was cancelled. Gepard 35 mm twin Oerlikon system was also retired, but having a new life in Ukraine against drones.
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
Their it's possible to change the barrel in under 1,5 hour to change from 120mm to 140mm or downsizing that is insane and the right direction but I didn't think the future MGS project to that Time Tanks on modern Battlefield not more necessary in future
Tanks will always be needed to support other ground troops. There will always be an arms race between tank protection and anti tank weapons. At the moment the anti tank weapons in the form of drones are leading, but this will go back and forth for an eternity. Infantry alone can not mount an effective offensive, they will always need support.
There is actually nothing unusual about the size and tonnage when compared to past heavy cruisers: The US Alaska Class cruisers built for WW II weighed in at about 30,000 tons; and the design was to specifically counter German pocket battleships and Japanese heavy cruisers. The Worcester Class (built after WW II) came in at about 18,000 tons fully loaded. Light cruisers typically came in about half (or less) of these tonnage. It's going to depend on the weaponry and defenses mounted on the ships to determine if these larger than normal current cruisers worldwide makes sense long term.
La même tourelle sera adaptée sur les "Leclerc", en attendant la relève.
Copy of Turkish Kizilelma.
That's not how the future Tempest will look like. Very old photo the cockpit want be as raised at the front. And want look like as shown. Obviously.
Can it be mounted on the *BOXER* ❓
This is a copy of the Serbian 40mm Pasars-16. The Serbian one is better. There are 4 types of missiles
Wrong. Pasars is a copy of the original Bofors TRIDON project that this TRIDON *Mk2* is a development of.
@@SonsOfLorgar The Serbian Pasars 16 is better than this one. Both the vehicle and the turret are armored. It is also very small. It shows a higher level of technology. It can be equipped with 4 types of air defense missiles and even 2 anti-tank missiles.
Made in USA 10,000 dollars a round any other country 1000.00 dollars a rd. Just thinking out loud. Corruption out of Our military industrial complex.
Serbian PASARS is first....🙂
Not even close...😂
@@SonsOfLorgar Cry like a bitch 🙂
Well if they are putting an autoloader in it maybe put a 140 mm or 150 mm gun in it
How many can you deliver to Ukraine in 48hours. That's the marketing mark.
who's paying?
Muy bien
I'm so sorry,but americans can Not doa commercial
hide it hide it
The reason its mk2 is that Tridon was developed but not bought in the 90s
Iirc, it was used by the Costal Artillery branch for a few years until the whole branch was disbanded and resuced to just a single Amphibious infantry regiment.
i'd take the russian pantsyr-2 any time.
Are you sure? It's track records sure is less than stellar😂
@@SonsOfLorgar it's way better than anything nato has.
@@kjererrrt2381 except it's failures in Ukraine that shows it can't even do what it was designed for 🤣🤡
@@SonsOfLorgar except most part of the uke energy generation system has been destroyed. except uke males are hunted down by the draftsmen and afraid of going outside.
Rafale is only 4.5 gen fighter jet that is totally unproven except in the cyber world. The fact of the matter is it is not battle -proven fighter jet like F16, F35, Sukhoi or Mig etc. It could be as great as its advertisements or NOT. No one knows!!
Totally unproven? What are you on about? They’ve flown combat missions in Iraq, in Libya, in Mali. They’re definitely more battle proven than the F-35, arguably as much as the Mig-29 or Sukhoi 27…
@@jeromeportier4914 Iraq Libya Mali are no military power to demonstrate fighter skills. It will not last against F35, Su57 and J20. Add that to the huge cost, it is not a viable fighter jet for India.
@@stratfordqbiswas853 So which one is it? Is it unproven, or not fit to face more modern jets, or too expensive? Or the three? First it is combat proven. Yes, IS and Libya were not peer adversaries, but who have the Mig-29s fought and come on top? Who have the Su-27 fought? In the 4.5gen, it is the most combat proven jet. Will it last against an F-35? It does not matter, because they will never face each other. How will it fare against a Su-57? Who knows? The Su-57 is totally combat unproven. Its real capabilities are unknown. And we don't even know if Russia will manage to produce it in numbers. The J-20 is a more interesting match. It also totally unproven, but it's almost 20 years younger, so it's not surprising it could be more than a match. But it has engine issues. And the Rafale is regularly modernised, so could have the upper hand in some areas, for example EW. Regarding the cost... The Rafale is expensive, but so are every 4.5 and 5th gen aircrafts. It is cheaper than the Eurofighter, arguably cheaper than the F-35... But whether it is or not does not matter since India is not getting the F-35 anyway.
@@jeromeportier4914 All of these. France with help from India created a big hype!!
@@stratfordqbiswas853 You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about!!! Before the Rafale, the Mirage 2000 was already an incredible aircraft, on par with the F-16 in his hay days, and even better in some areas. The Mirage 4000 showed Dassault could improve the design even further, and the Rafale improved on the design again. In 2000 it promised a lot but was a bit raw, lacking integration of several systems and confined to air-to-air missions, but already promising. By 2011 it was mature though, and surprised a lot of people by flying missions in Libya without NATO support (they flew the day before the U.S. and UK came) and without EW support. That’s where the hype came from. Real combat missions. India only came after.
Serbian pasars air defense is king in that area
It's an upgrade of the same thing...
@@SonsOfLorgar true but high more sophisticated and way better armed for now
I used to doubt whether Serbia's design was outdated, but the appearance of MK2 yesterday proved that Pasars16 is still valuable.
Dont know if the Serbian has day/night camera.
Serbia has it. It uses a French thermal imager and is integrated with the French Mistral 3+ air defense missile.
The CTA international cannon is the best new auto Cannon in the world right now the ammo is great reduced by almost half the size of current 40mm case ammo! And i hope that the Italian ideas of developing a HVC 60mm cannon with IMI, actually is already developed but they will never enter mass prodution and is superior to the majority of cannons now a days even the Mark 110 57mm the 60mm HVC cannon is capable of defeating almost any body armour at 1500meters and can reach easily 8km max range, but NATO needs is a lighter 76mm light towed howitzer that weights a ton or with wheels and carriage, and start to produce the DRACO armoured IFV version with a 76mm/L62 cannon in a fast IFV with all the types of ammo around the globe would be a great weapon for troop support worked fine in the WW 1 in the French and allied armies and others and will worked fine right now, and NATO needs a 127mm/L58 light towed howitzer with a great range of ammo already in mass prodution and capable of hiting targets at more than 30km to rival the russians 122mm and 130 D-30 cannon that is one of the best worldwide period, why NATO dont start to develop new improve solutions and a more heavier mortar of 166mm and a 40 to 50 kilo rounds that can create true devastation, things have to evolve in WW 2 was develop more weapons that in the latest 85 years its ridicolous, military industrial complex is always great for any economy the Americans now it and the Russians now it to, Europe is the ones who failed to understand and they praticly invented war
Why don't the drones move? Questionable air defense!!!
Serbia produce even better, much better for the 10 years
Jezeli strzela w ruchu to ok . Jezeli nie to slabo.
Serbian PASARS-16 brought me here.
Дрон может подлететь от куда угодно и уничтожить. Нету пока лекарства от дронов. 😮 в интересное время живём
Why not make these systems into a Articulated Lorry. Put it on a trailer so a truck can just pull it, drop it off & pick it up. the Driver can leave the system and seek cover. Keep distance from the system which is bound to be attacked.
I think it is displayed as a palletised system that looks like the whole gun & power pack is a drop able platform.
It can its looks like a drop vehicle to me
*All other arms manufacturers in the world:* _"This is our newly designed combat vehicle and weapons system, with next gen capabilities and all kinds of fancy gadgets. "_ *BAE Systems:* _"We put gun on truck. We put cannon on dump-truck. We put radar on car."_
If it works it works
Well Britain is getting closer and closer to bankruptcy so we'll better get used to seeing Toyota Hy-lux with anti aircraft guns mounted on the back of the trucks. It's the way of the future. It's the way of allies of the United States apparently. Hell maybe we in Europe are going to see the return of the religious wars era, Evangelicals vs the non-believers. Who knows. Wouldn't be surprised, US policies have become some insane, a greater appeal will have to be made to our inner psyche to continue bolstering support. So it's the all seeing eye of god again after failing to do it with CCTV.