The video you have the comments turned off on the like a 50 versus the like a 50. Why is it constantly dinging? You can't watch the video because of the audio dings in the background. I thought it was a warning chime on my car driving. Well it looks like could be a good video you can't pay attention to because of the constant dings. Try to take it down and redo it. I bet it would be a hit
@dedskin1Ай бұрын
you only shoot close ups , lenses have different quality depending on how far the subject is , some or most Zoom lenses even change Focal Length with focus so if you focus close you get 100mm say , and if you zoom out you get 150mm lens , so 2 different lenses . This is why is say testing it only close up is insufficient , things can change
@pggrootde67262 ай бұрын
Please cut that distracting lounge-music….😢!
@univenpecalipre2 ай бұрын
Great device
@florresinc30912 ай бұрын
I got mine for 4€ out of my trustie second hand shop ;)
@DethronerX2 ай бұрын
Slowest talking, with longest breaks after every 3 words, is driving me insaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaane
@sacardevos2 ай бұрын
The shots were all with max aperture? I think if you step up a bit, you would get no vignetting and better sharpness.
@karim2k2 ай бұрын
The main question is it worth buying today?
@QUANTUMJOKER3 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video guide. I performed the glowing Apple logo mod on my clamshell iBook earlier tonight, but also did the translucent screen bezel mod. ;)
@theadamloose3 ай бұрын
Soll ich mir das deutsche Englisch jetzt 12min reinziehen? Dann bekomm ich partielle Einseitige, Lähmung und gesichtskirmes auf der anderen Seite. Toll, dass sie englisch können, aber beschränken Sie es bitte auf die zwischenmenschliche Kommunikation. Videos müssen echt nicht so kommentiert werden.
@eliedelorme99454 ай бұрын
I have the aus Jena DDR with the minimum focus distance 0,18m and it is a fantastic and real macro lens that I cherish and use on my Contax D and on my Canon 6d with amazing results. Thanks for your review
@Island-pool5 ай бұрын
When shooting portraits, you don’t want to be close.. makes the subject more comfortable
@Island-pool5 ай бұрын
Old soft lenses are best for portraits
@KobusGevelspar6 ай бұрын
Do you write the text, translate and talk at the same time ?
@peterandrews82236 ай бұрын
This lens is NOT the same as Dr Rudolph's original double-Gauss Planar design. It has an asymmetrical design of 7 elements in 6 groups. There are 4 separate elements in front of the iris, and 3 behind it, with one group being a cemented doublet. The optical performance of this revised Planar is far better than the old 6 element/4 group design.
@ThunderSilence7 ай бұрын
Oh Gott😱 Ei kaant bälief id ☝ wäll dann 👍
@simoncheng96318 ай бұрын
Hi, my pentagon 200 f4, the aperture is no working, it is in wide open and cannot be adjusted.it stuck in the wide open position, can you show me how to sort it out for problem.
@kpn948 ай бұрын
One of the most beautiful apple mouse, Also the worst one to fix. Nice work doertpen!
@yxx_chris_xxy9 ай бұрын
I use this lens to document my hits from my BF109, so the 2.5m minimum focus distance is not a problem for me.
@samd323111 ай бұрын
Even if Apple makes good products sometimes we wonder if the engineers took their breakfast in the morning before going to work because to change a hard drive you have to disassemble everything until you remove the screen must still not laugh We can criticize the PCs nevertheless we just have a hatch to open to change the hard drive and the ram ... And in addition you will notice that at that time he put the apples upside down because when the Mac is turned on the apple is found upside down for the person in front MDR but hey we will say that it was still the beginning of the Apple epic .... Même si Apple fais des bons produits des fois on se demande si les ingénieurs mon bien pris leur petit déjeuner le matin avant d'aller bosser car pour changer un disque dur il faut tout démonter jusqu'à enlever l'écran faut quand même pas rigoler On a beau critiquer les PC néanmoins on a juste une trappe à ouvrir pour changer le disque dur ainsi que la ram ... Et en plus vous pourrez remarquer qu'à cette époque il mettait les pommes à l'envers car quand le Mac est allumé la pomme se retrouve à l'envers pour la personne en face MDR mais bon on va dire que c'était encore le début de l'épopée Apple.....
@AnimusNitra-X Жыл бұрын
The list of lenses by Isco seems not to be complete because there is also the westrogen lens from Isco that was not mentioned. Its rare but its there ;)
@bryanoliveira9513 Жыл бұрын
my friend, are you selling on avito?
@davidjenkins8009 Жыл бұрын
I am surprised you have a copy with no play in the focus rack. I have had at least three of these and all three have had play when you change rotation of the focus ring. At one time, back in the early 1980's I had a Rolleiflex sl35E with seven Rollei Zeiss and Carl Zeiss lenses and all the Rollei Zeiss lenses suffered this play. I have had the same in the SLX lenses I have had. I used to think this was only a Rollei problem as I have never noticed this with Canon or Pentax lenses. That is until I purchased the later versions of the Pentax 67 lenses which have similar issue. However, I have to say the performance of all Rollei lenses was always good. Sadly I do not have any of these lenses today, I wish I had not sold them in the 1980's. The HFT coating was developed with Zeiss and for all purposes is the same as their T* coating. People should remember that by the time your lens was made, quite an old lens design but it still produced a competitive performance with more modern designs of the 1970's. So well done Zeiss. I did enjoy the video.
@davidjenkins8009 Жыл бұрын
My apologies, Zeiss started manufacturing it in 1968 (in the Voigtlander factory) so it was not all that old a design but some of the Japanese manufacture's did come to the market with lenses after and the point I was making was the design of the lens was a really good one, it stood the test of time. Rollei started manufacturing the lens in 1974.
@janflieger4004 Жыл бұрын
Deutsch mit engl. Untertiteln wäre besser.
@robertocristianbobubrc1759 Жыл бұрын
here s an interesting thoght, first of all i d like to say than
@williamcurwen7428 Жыл бұрын
I have the Jupiter 9, it is a superb lens faithful to the Sonnar design. Soft at full aperture, then at f4 it suddenly starts to become really sharp with increasing contrast down to f22. I use mine with a very deep lens hood and have no problems with flare from off axis lighting. If you look at the Mir (Flektagon) Helios (Biotar) and Jupiter (Sonnar) they all have similar characteristics with individually beautiful bokeh. I have all three as part of my permanent collection.
@ast3663 Жыл бұрын
this double-CF adapter would be more usable if it would show up two separate partitions, not one.
@MrDegsy69 Жыл бұрын
That dark spot on the image is really annoying! Is it something on the lens? I thought was my phone screen for a time.
@genestassov3845 Жыл бұрын
It is not "Key zero" ) It is Kino Objective USSR made (LOMO, Leningrad Optical- Machanical )
@MCmix64 Жыл бұрын
Самый поганый перевод, ну и чурки же вы безмозглые...
@MrStoneMen Жыл бұрын
Hi, I have an old version with 12 blades looking for a lens hood. Which lens hood do you use exactely ? Greetings from Germany
@doertepn Жыл бұрын
Ich habe bei EBay diese Leica Sonnenblendenverschnitte gekauft. Die sind extrem billig und tuen den Job tatsächlich sehr gut
@Ed.Focuss Жыл бұрын
Nice
@rv31416 Жыл бұрын
Muchas gracias desde Mexico, muy ilustrativo tu video
@cybermees Жыл бұрын
Merci, thanks, I have this lens! QBM old version, before 1975, all metal (it's not marked HFT in red on the front),, it is not a formula 7 elements in 6 groups? I don't like to use full open optics! I always close a one stop, even 2 stops, the photos are often much sharper and more homogeneous at f2.8, there is still bokeh (I'm not crazy about bokeh, as long as it's smooth) and I prefer sharpness, otherwise why use Zeiss?.I did a test at f2, very surprised at the quality already! ,, sorry for my English
@janflieger4004 Жыл бұрын
Er hätte lieber deutsch sprechen sollen.
@DominikMarczuk Жыл бұрын
How do you tell it was made by Chinon? I have one of these lenses and can't seem to find a way to identify the actual manufacturer.
@mogbaba Жыл бұрын
While I confirm it's short comings, I have a very special feeling about the images it produces. I mean, like looking at the whole picture. It's very nice, indeed. I have the original Chinon brand, which is exactly the same as this one, and I won't trade it. I have also the FA 35 f2, that is a very good lens, but still, they produce different type of images. Thank you for the review
@JamesOversteer Жыл бұрын
I didn’t realise they were IDE inside. Explains the crazy prices for these drives.
@magik8566 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your review, I have a silver 2.8 as well - Tell me, do I start from the front or from the back to reach the helicoid to re-lube? No screws are showing anywhere... So should go front the front removing the nameplate etc, or from the back, there are 2 marks for inserting a calliper but... The aperture ring is turning fine, focusing is stiff.
@creepyoldhouseexplorersclub Жыл бұрын
Do a review of the Voigtlander zoomar
@firman_adams Жыл бұрын
May I know what type of adapter are you using? I'm using a jupiter k3 50mm f1.5 the focus is really bad. Please help
@Itchybiscuit Жыл бұрын
Thanks very much for the review. You appear to have version 2 of this lens. It focuses between 0.36 (1.2ft) and 10m (30ft). It has 9 aperture blades. I have version 1.2 which focuses between 0.35 (1.15ft) and 10m (33ft) - that’s how it’s marked on the lens. My lens also has 9 aperture blades. Another strange marking is the vanity ring. My version says Jena F 1:2.8 f = 35 Nr. 4425011 and it’s in Exacta mount. I also own the modern 35mm f2.4 version. It’s a completely different animal. 😊
@dlyon9673 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this review. I recently discovered these cameras and really like them. The lenses are particularly beautiful in design and manufacture, and can be adapted to digital cameras, which provides some relief from concerns about developing problems with the camera body itself, which is as you noted, complex, and will likely become increasingly difficult to repair.
@XrFilms_ Жыл бұрын
No offense but I think that that's a second generation because the first ones had a different type of font
@newemphasis Жыл бұрын
does anyone know what film i need to use with it?
@doertepn Жыл бұрын
35mm Standard film
@newemphasis Жыл бұрын
@@doertepn my lever is stuck and i am not able to wind, would you know how to fix it?
@AndriusMaciunas Жыл бұрын
KO, not K0(zero). :)
@ArminHirmer2 жыл бұрын
were these early models with uncoated glass? looks great to me
@doertepn2 жыл бұрын
No it should have a Single coating. It shimmers bluely… it is a Great Lens. I am using it right now in my Holiday. And i am Realy happy with the results
@moeskido2 жыл бұрын
"Hideous process," indeed. I'm about to attempt this same upgrade. Raising a glass to you. Also, Carbon Copy Cloner is great and deserves support. I use it every day, and I'm happy to pay its developer for that.
@maikpasedag2 жыл бұрын
be creative instead of searching „bad things“ it’s vintage 🤦🏼
Пікірлер
This is 2nd not 1st mate
The video you have the comments turned off on the like a 50 versus the like a 50. Why is it constantly dinging? You can't watch the video because of the audio dings in the background. I thought it was a warning chime on my car driving. Well it looks like could be a good video you can't pay attention to because of the constant dings. Try to take it down and redo it. I bet it would be a hit
you only shoot close ups , lenses have different quality depending on how far the subject is , some or most Zoom lenses even change Focal Length with focus so if you focus close you get 100mm say , and if you zoom out you get 150mm lens , so 2 different lenses . This is why is say testing it only close up is insufficient , things can change
Please cut that distracting lounge-music….😢!
Great device
I got mine for 4€ out of my trustie second hand shop ;)
Slowest talking, with longest breaks after every 3 words, is driving me insaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaane
The shots were all with max aperture? I think if you step up a bit, you would get no vignetting and better sharpness.
The main question is it worth buying today?
Thank you for this video guide. I performed the glowing Apple logo mod on my clamshell iBook earlier tonight, but also did the translucent screen bezel mod. ;)
Soll ich mir das deutsche Englisch jetzt 12min reinziehen? Dann bekomm ich partielle Einseitige, Lähmung und gesichtskirmes auf der anderen Seite. Toll, dass sie englisch können, aber beschränken Sie es bitte auf die zwischenmenschliche Kommunikation. Videos müssen echt nicht so kommentiert werden.
I have the aus Jena DDR with the minimum focus distance 0,18m and it is a fantastic and real macro lens that I cherish and use on my Contax D and on my Canon 6d with amazing results. Thanks for your review
When shooting portraits, you don’t want to be close.. makes the subject more comfortable
Old soft lenses are best for portraits
Do you write the text, translate and talk at the same time ?
This lens is NOT the same as Dr Rudolph's original double-Gauss Planar design. It has an asymmetrical design of 7 elements in 6 groups. There are 4 separate elements in front of the iris, and 3 behind it, with one group being a cemented doublet. The optical performance of this revised Planar is far better than the old 6 element/4 group design.
Oh Gott😱 Ei kaant bälief id ☝ wäll dann 👍
Hi, my pentagon 200 f4, the aperture is no working, it is in wide open and cannot be adjusted.it stuck in the wide open position, can you show me how to sort it out for problem.
One of the most beautiful apple mouse, Also the worst one to fix. Nice work doertpen!
I use this lens to document my hits from my BF109, so the 2.5m minimum focus distance is not a problem for me.
Even if Apple makes good products sometimes we wonder if the engineers took their breakfast in the morning before going to work because to change a hard drive you have to disassemble everything until you remove the screen must still not laugh We can criticize the PCs nevertheless we just have a hatch to open to change the hard drive and the ram ... And in addition you will notice that at that time he put the apples upside down because when the Mac is turned on the apple is found upside down for the person in front MDR but hey we will say that it was still the beginning of the Apple epic .... Même si Apple fais des bons produits des fois on se demande si les ingénieurs mon bien pris leur petit déjeuner le matin avant d'aller bosser car pour changer un disque dur il faut tout démonter jusqu'à enlever l'écran faut quand même pas rigoler On a beau critiquer les PC néanmoins on a juste une trappe à ouvrir pour changer le disque dur ainsi que la ram ... Et en plus vous pourrez remarquer qu'à cette époque il mettait les pommes à l'envers car quand le Mac est allumé la pomme se retrouve à l'envers pour la personne en face MDR mais bon on va dire que c'était encore le début de l'épopée Apple.....
The list of lenses by Isco seems not to be complete because there is also the westrogen lens from Isco that was not mentioned. Its rare but its there ;)
my friend, are you selling on avito?
I am surprised you have a copy with no play in the focus rack. I have had at least three of these and all three have had play when you change rotation of the focus ring. At one time, back in the early 1980's I had a Rolleiflex sl35E with seven Rollei Zeiss and Carl Zeiss lenses and all the Rollei Zeiss lenses suffered this play. I have had the same in the SLX lenses I have had. I used to think this was only a Rollei problem as I have never noticed this with Canon or Pentax lenses. That is until I purchased the later versions of the Pentax 67 lenses which have similar issue. However, I have to say the performance of all Rollei lenses was always good. Sadly I do not have any of these lenses today, I wish I had not sold them in the 1980's. The HFT coating was developed with Zeiss and for all purposes is the same as their T* coating. People should remember that by the time your lens was made, quite an old lens design but it still produced a competitive performance with more modern designs of the 1970's. So well done Zeiss. I did enjoy the video.
My apologies, Zeiss started manufacturing it in 1968 (in the Voigtlander factory) so it was not all that old a design but some of the Japanese manufacture's did come to the market with lenses after and the point I was making was the design of the lens was a really good one, it stood the test of time. Rollei started manufacturing the lens in 1974.
Deutsch mit engl. Untertiteln wäre besser.
here s an interesting thoght, first of all i d like to say than
I have the Jupiter 9, it is a superb lens faithful to the Sonnar design. Soft at full aperture, then at f4 it suddenly starts to become really sharp with increasing contrast down to f22. I use mine with a very deep lens hood and have no problems with flare from off axis lighting. If you look at the Mir (Flektagon) Helios (Biotar) and Jupiter (Sonnar) they all have similar characteristics with individually beautiful bokeh. I have all three as part of my permanent collection.
this double-CF adapter would be more usable if it would show up two separate partitions, not one.
That dark spot on the image is really annoying! Is it something on the lens? I thought was my phone screen for a time.
It is not "Key zero" ) It is Kino Objective USSR made (LOMO, Leningrad Optical- Machanical )
Самый поганый перевод, ну и чурки же вы безмозглые...
Hi, I have an old version with 12 blades looking for a lens hood. Which lens hood do you use exactely ? Greetings from Germany
Ich habe bei EBay diese Leica Sonnenblendenverschnitte gekauft. Die sind extrem billig und tuen den Job tatsächlich sehr gut
Nice
Muchas gracias desde Mexico, muy ilustrativo tu video
Merci, thanks, I have this lens! QBM old version, before 1975, all metal (it's not marked HFT in red on the front),, it is not a formula 7 elements in 6 groups? I don't like to use full open optics! I always close a one stop, even 2 stops, the photos are often much sharper and more homogeneous at f2.8, there is still bokeh (I'm not crazy about bokeh, as long as it's smooth) and I prefer sharpness, otherwise why use Zeiss?.I did a test at f2, very surprised at the quality already! ,, sorry for my English
Er hätte lieber deutsch sprechen sollen.
How do you tell it was made by Chinon? I have one of these lenses and can't seem to find a way to identify the actual manufacturer.
While I confirm it's short comings, I have a very special feeling about the images it produces. I mean, like looking at the whole picture. It's very nice, indeed. I have the original Chinon brand, which is exactly the same as this one, and I won't trade it. I have also the FA 35 f2, that is a very good lens, but still, they produce different type of images. Thank you for the review
I didn’t realise they were IDE inside. Explains the crazy prices for these drives.
Thanks for your review, I have a silver 2.8 as well - Tell me, do I start from the front or from the back to reach the helicoid to re-lube? No screws are showing anywhere... So should go front the front removing the nameplate etc, or from the back, there are 2 marks for inserting a calliper but... The aperture ring is turning fine, focusing is stiff.
Do a review of the Voigtlander zoomar
May I know what type of adapter are you using? I'm using a jupiter k3 50mm f1.5 the focus is really bad. Please help
Thanks very much for the review. You appear to have version 2 of this lens. It focuses between 0.36 (1.2ft) and 10m (30ft). It has 9 aperture blades. I have version 1.2 which focuses between 0.35 (1.15ft) and 10m (33ft) - that’s how it’s marked on the lens. My lens also has 9 aperture blades. Another strange marking is the vanity ring. My version says Jena F 1:2.8 f = 35 Nr. 4425011 and it’s in Exacta mount. I also own the modern 35mm f2.4 version. It’s a completely different animal. 😊
Thank you for this review. I recently discovered these cameras and really like them. The lenses are particularly beautiful in design and manufacture, and can be adapted to digital cameras, which provides some relief from concerns about developing problems with the camera body itself, which is as you noted, complex, and will likely become increasingly difficult to repair.
No offense but I think that that's a second generation because the first ones had a different type of font
does anyone know what film i need to use with it?
35mm Standard film
@@doertepn my lever is stuck and i am not able to wind, would you know how to fix it?
KO, not K0(zero). :)
were these early models with uncoated glass? looks great to me
No it should have a Single coating. It shimmers bluely… it is a Great Lens. I am using it right now in my Holiday. And i am Realy happy with the results
"Hideous process," indeed. I'm about to attempt this same upgrade. Raising a glass to you. Also, Carbon Copy Cloner is great and deserves support. I use it every day, and I'm happy to pay its developer for that.
be creative instead of searching „bad things“ it’s vintage 🤦🏼