Пікірлер

• 
  @MCDainter29 минут бұрын

  Have you heard of the new glueball partical? Links to the furst ever formations of matter at the start of the universe. Love the video!

• 
  @AlexanderTomato-ic2vg54 минут бұрын

  The only controversy is him saying controversy wrong💀💀💀

• 
  @BradleyLayton2 сағат бұрын

  I would love to look at how to apply these concepts to pulling rare earth elements and critical elements from coal fly ash quantitatively. Thanks in advance for sharing technical resources.

• 
  @kisho26796 сағат бұрын

  why do we want at all want to know WHERE just a single electron might be, if we only can controll the bunch of many many many electrons?

• 
  @kisho26796 сағат бұрын

  since orbitals are energy levels in space (stable in time), do electrons kind of "create/stretch" space itself?

• 
  @notconnected3815Күн бұрын

  Is it actually possible for a reaction to stop completely? Or does it just react verry verry slowly? Because by pure chance there will always be a few molecules reacting, even on low temperature, right?

• 
  @notconnected3815Күн бұрын

  Choleric people also have a low activation energy 😉

• 
  @AutisticThinkerКүн бұрын

  It’s just physics not chemistry, but I like liquid nitrogen for energy storage. New SciShow talked about this.

• 
  @MahendraVikramGaurme23d010Күн бұрын

  Definitely 😊

• 
  @easteregg-ch5jgКүн бұрын

  I wish and tjink you would grow exponentially on this channel

• 
  @th0harКүн бұрын

  Never had this subject explained quite so simply and elequently before. Someone buy that homeless man a cup of tea!

• 
  @aleccoles5557Күн бұрын

  This was really well explained, especially with the animations. Thanks

• 
  @arbordianae2 күн бұрын

  i would enjoy an equilibrium video :)

• 
  @winstonsblues2 күн бұрын

  Thanks so much for the elnightenment!

• 
  @john-ic5pz2 күн бұрын

  come now sir.... invisible matter? no mechanism proposed for why it can't be detected = bad science. that it is also unfalsifiable is also terribly convenient. ignoring electromagnetic force, 36 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity, is a lot of missing force. see what that is? ...a proposed mechanism/driving force to account for all the "missing matter" in your models. and honestly, sir, "very dense matter" that doesn't scatter x-rays is pretty unlikely isn't it? 🤔 gravity sucks, what blows? the standard model, my friends. "ONE THING that is (also) repulsive is called the electromagnetic force." * can anyone explain how black holes form....how does a collapsing star's gravity overcome the repulsive Coulombic force that becomes overwhelmingly large as the matter heats (ionizes) and comes extremely close in the compressing matter? even neutral matter follows the Leonard Jones potential curve. the curve gets awfully steep the closer the two particles approach one another! ty in advance, I am sincere in my curiosity 🙏🏻

• 
  @amigomurcho73212 күн бұрын

  Good video

• 
  @russeil2 күн бұрын

  Wow wow wow! I feel so lucky to find this channel in my finall year of highschool, never thought I could understand orbitals this perfectly..Amazing work!!

• 
  @hypatia-du-bois-marie2 күн бұрын

  So like a gauge boson except you don't need perturbative alchemy to compute the scattering amplitude (multiple pun intended).

• 
  @deepdusto2 күн бұрын

  I love your thinking style (very few have that) but then you use some extra vocabulary like 'casual knocks', 'external knocks' and some more ... that I and many readers would not know ... so it becomes a bit of struggle to understand.

• 
  @prins19912 күн бұрын

  Whichever has a greater vapor pressure deficit dries wet clothes faster.

• 
  @SaturdayCrunch3 күн бұрын

  Buick gang

• 
  @erikzachar41873 күн бұрын

  I'll be so glad if you made a video about volatility or about topics like fluorescence, phosporoscence, non-binding interactionst

• 
  @Grateful923 күн бұрын

  The past is full of smoothed surfaces 😅

• 
  @DeVibe.3 күн бұрын

  M + F → MF is a very low activation energy reaction

• 
  @LiborTinka3 күн бұрын

  Thanks! You could also make a video about self-ionization (autoionozation) and homoassociation - I am struggling with understanding this and there is little information on encyclopedia. For example, the salt called sodium diacetate (the "salt & vinegar" flavor from Pringles) is a solid of two molecules of acetic acid and one (!) molecule of sodium. The "complex" is neutral because the two acid molecules share hydrogen atom. But how is that possible? I don't understand the dotted line - how can hydrogen be stuck between two molecules of acid like that? Another typical example is hydrogen fluoride and I think iodine does that, too (the triiodide ion). I think this topic can make your video interesting as you can show how the fluoroantimonic acid (the superacid) works, as it's one such "complex" - the dihydrogen fluoride cation and hexafluoroantimonate anion - it's not just hydrogen bonded to weak nucleophile as in normal acid, but this weird fluoride cation. Thanks for your videos, these are very informative and helful for self-learners like me - especially for revisiting the fundamentals.

• 
  @user-vq4hu7bx9g3 күн бұрын

  Good🎉🎉

• 
  @jonmcmahon902923 күн бұрын

  thank you

• 
  @galaxybidhan10343 күн бұрын

  It does have three orbitals by including one sigma bond and excluding the pi bond at the bottom. A lone pair also makes an orbital.

• 
  @sherwinganpatt25603 күн бұрын

  Wow, your videos are incredible! Thank you so much for your amazing teaching....truly grateful sir

• 
  @newrran3 күн бұрын

  Que aula incrível! Could you make a video telling us how to make those animations used along the video?

• 
  @Bartosz40074 күн бұрын

  Damn i wish i was smarter

• 
  @versus_x4 күн бұрын

  Electron spin video please 🙏

• 
  @tamilbiology50784 күн бұрын

  How enzymes lower the activation energy? Kindly explain

• 
  @babynautilusКүн бұрын

  when a substrate binds to a protein, the whole thing can undergo a conformation shift pushing molecules together in the orientation that is favorable for a reaction. the amino acids that make up the protein will also have certain side chains exposed in the active site, that influence the chemical and charge environment right where it needs to be!🤯

• 
  @DemiImp4 күн бұрын

  Friction can include elastic deformation and isn't always from bond destruction

• 
  @maxime3648Күн бұрын

  Elastic deformation is bond destruction

• 
  @DemiImp8 сағат бұрын

  @@maxime3648 No, that's plastic deformation.

• 
  @maxime36485 сағат бұрын

  @@DemiImp plastic deformation is bonds breaking up and forming back with other atoms, as opposed with elastic deformation where the bonds are streched but not broken

• 
  @ShivamSoni-uz5xw4 күн бұрын

  0:58

• 
  @LucasVieira-ob6fx4 күн бұрын

  The (re)action that haves the highest activation energy is getting up in the morning

• 
  @siglec14 күн бұрын

  I'm really grateful for your videos! Thanks for delving a bit deeper while still explaining topics so clearly. We'd love to see a video about reversible reactions.

• 
  @chaoticrampage41604 күн бұрын

  Around 10 yeas ago I provided 200 grams of black powder in a closed ball mill jar the activation energy to deflagrate by shaking it in my hands.

• 
  @ElectronFieldPulse4 күн бұрын

  This always confused me because electrons act like waves in every way until they are measured the wave function collapses. So, until measure I would always think of them as waves, and really don’t it makes me think they must be waves that have a peculiar property when measured, like the wave deposits a quanta of energy or something.

• 
  @Richardincancale4 күн бұрын

  Friction is chemical energy? Where would you put van der Waals forces (as beloved of geckos feet) - would you put that in a chemistry book or a physics book? :-)

• 
  @ThreeTwentysix4 күн бұрын

  That's an excellent point. Personally, I'd categorise van her Waals forces as a chemical interaction, and therefore, a form of chemical potential energy but others might disagree.

• 
  @jonathanazenon87314 күн бұрын

  Please a video on reversible reactions! Honestly this is my favorite channel to keep learning about topics we touched in undergrad. Keep up the amazing content

• 
  @lautaromorales29035 күн бұрын

  Excelent video. I can't wait for the N2 video! Is there a way to obtain the Activation Energy besides the K from the velocity law? (v=K[A]....)

• 
  @ThreeTwentysix4 күн бұрын

  You can predict it with computer modelling, but experimental evidence is always king.

• 
  5 күн бұрын

  You asked me to click the like button, but I can't, as I already did it earlier! (This comment was left for the algorithm 😄)

• 
  @akarshpandey61355 күн бұрын

  Bruh broke glass for us😊

• 
  @ThreeTwentysix4 күн бұрын

  I'll let you in on a secret - the glass didn't break. I really like this glass, so I was crouched by the table, pushing it along with my right hand, while my left hand was under the table ready to catch it. All while trying to keep my head out of shot. This was not an easy shoot.

• 
  @MadScientist2672 күн бұрын

  I figured there was a pillow on the floor lol

• 
  @NotSure4165 күн бұрын

  A video on the mechanics of electrolysis would be awesome.

• 
  @13calin5 күн бұрын

  I just discovered you channel and quickly fell in love with your videos. You really made me want to learn more about chemistry and physics. Thank you very much!