Unbiased Video's For Filmmakers & Creators.
CVP are Europe’s largest professional video, broadcast & cinema solution provider. Our KZread channel focuses on in-depth camera reviews, lens evaluations, technical analysis, creative examples, professional advice, industry news and much more!
Пікірлер
Main difference is image quality and micro contrast
What about the DZO Arles lenses? 😢😄
What does “decently parfocal” mean? Either they can zoom and hold focus or they can’t
KLMF!
Really looking forward to a video-centric review of the Z8. I'm still not sure if I should go with the Z8 because I love Nikon for photography but prefer Sony for video. I would also be interested in a combined review of the Megadap Sony adapter for dual use with Sony and Nikon Lenses ;)
Is it too late to request the fuji 18-120mm f4 PZ review? It still doesn't have much coverage on KZread. The people who have reviewed it seem to be more photography focused and don't make use of the par-focal powerzoom functionalities in the field. It was the first x-mount lens designed in collaboration with fujinon engineers and I'd hate for it to go down as a failed experiment. Even if it misses the mark, I'd love to see what they come up with for future collaborations.
Would love to see you guys review the Sony BRC-AM7 4K60 PTZ Camera with AI Auto-Framing. Great job with this video and thanks for keeping us up to date!
You need to try z9/z8 compared to other cameras
You will be blown away by the quality of the Nikon S primes
Knocked Loose 🤘
OMG, can I already pre-order the Blazar Remus 33mm T1.9? Pretty please? ❤
Blackmagic have.not heard tbeir fanboys, tbey most certainly desire a flippy screen, they"d love 10G IP, but get only 1, and they want ND aboard such a profi-cam, but the Grant God won't hear 'em.
Canon is also teasing a new cinema eos body for June 5th!
Keep an eye on our channel that day ;) Jake
Love that hoodie 🤘
The Nikon Plena and the Z6iii when is released.
Great to see that you have access to Nikon gear now 🤓! I would like to see your reviews of Nikkor 135mm f1.8 S Plena, 85mm f1.2 S and 50mm f1.2 S 😊
AND the 58mm f0.95 Noct!
Is Logic 2 Pro a free upgrade?
👏🏾👍🏾🙏🏾🏴🇸🇪🇹🇹
13:47 unfortunately, even on 3.01 firmware my a7s3 keeps spoiling the files from time to time via restarting the camera when recording... :x
Did DJI fix the worst interference I’ve ever experienced in a wireless mic?
Just noticed Knocked Loose hoodie
Channel keeps getting better and better 🔥
Never would have expected it but my dude just got even more of my respect
i didnt realize just how big they have gotten
informative content Thanks CVP
I really enjoyed this video, thank you! Have you had an experience with the Zeiss CP.3 cine lenses? I've heard these described as "clean" and they sit at the more affordable end of the cine lens scale.
Does this camera file support in silverstak lab and davinci resolve
Look at that hair 🌊
Nisi Athena or this??
first vid drop got 600views lol keep going bro!
You do have to ask yourself, why did not ARRI make an upgraded version of this camera. total missed opportunity.
can arri alexa's viewer be set for a left eye dominant user?
Thank you for this very informative video! I noticed in your description that you have a set of Otus primes in the studio. I wondered if you could write a word about how you think these compare to the cine lenses you have reviewed, when it comes purely to image quality? I am deciding between the DZO Vespins and the Otus, and I don't need the cine housing, wondering which to go for. Many thanks!
Hey cvp!! Is the Chiopt lens parfocal? Cheers
It's not 60p, that means 60 vertical pixels. It's 60hz, 60 FPS, or p60, as in 1080p60.
awesome job i just subscribed and watch again
In relativity new to cine lenses and I find the technicalities really interesting. Have you got any videos on your channel covering lens basics?? I just find it all fascinating.
The new DZO Arles are looking like another fabulous sharp, compact and affordable set of FF primes with an extra stop of shallow DOF and better CA than the Vespid.
I think one issue with the original sigma was obvious stepping in aperture when it was being changed via auto exposure...unlike lumix lenses which are smooth...do we know if this has changed in the new version?
There's only two sets of glass i've been blown away by and makes my work look really good. Sigma ART (EF w/ HSM)and Zeiss OTUS. Nothing beats them
I preordered one from CVP for the BMCC6K
The best thing about clean footage, is that you can dial in a "look". In post production there are filters, LUTs, stock types and many other tools to give your footage the look that you want. This gives you a choice, before you do delivery. If you use a "character" lens you have basically used a physical "burn in".
I love my c70 it still works all the time, but I only have 1 s35 lens in my whole kit. As much as I love the adapter - give me a DGO FF sensor and I’ll be happy!
Can you recommend a lens shop that is up to CVP's standards in the US? I am looking to have my Canon C500 mark II lens mount properly shimmed as well as my full set of XEEN primes lenses. I would very much appreciate your assistance!
I would check out Duclos Lenses! - www.ducloslenses.com Jake
I would buy this, but the price is too high even used, when someone’s selling a Blackmagic Ursa mini on eBay for $1300. The C70 is under 4K used.
Still no XLR inputs.
Makes you feel less of an idiot using the same E mount G lens for the Alpha cameras onto a Venice I or a Burano...but of course, directors and cinematographers have that look they want to achieve. Seeing how these "still" cameras have rather good video features and performance, their lenses won't be out of place shooting video...
Fantastic video. Can you do one for zoom? Thanks
When Blackmagic introduce the Ursa Mini 12k and claim its nothng to do with resolution but everything to do with have better colours they could not really prove it except when using the Zeiss Otus, clean aterfefact free lens that properly deliver colour seperation from the sensor that vintage and other inspired modern lenses cant do.
Why cinematographers (the best ones like Deakins) use clean sharp lenses? It is because he knows his lightings and create conditions with lights to achieve what he wants. Deakins don't even use diffusion filters. In effect a perfect artefact free lens is liken to a blank canvas. Lens that are soft with artefact and warm cast, etc, full of problems but lend itself to what others describe as "character" to tell a story are useful but cannot be useful for all types of stories or projects.
Zeiss CP.3 Full Frame not in line up?
I’ve noticed strong focus breathing in Hawk lenses. What’s your take on these lenses? They gain increasing popularity and I wonder why…
I think we tend to fixate so much on camera’s and the technology of sharpness that we can forget the other departments. I was at a recent panel and a hair and makeup up deisnegrr was talking about how on the recent season of Bridgerton the swap to 8k (I assume leaping form Sony Venice 1 6k to Venice 2 8k) caused the wigs to look horrible.* Like the hair nets they have always used were suddenly very noticeable so they had to try and relearn their craft and techniques for cheating. And the same thing applies to production design and costuming. Do I think vintage or grungy or character lenses also have the benefit of saving time and money in other departments since sharp 8k, won’t only add to the cost of data storage! Though ultimately as with most things it’s up to the artists involved and the story should come first. I just don’t want to see a whiplash effect where everyone starts saying “only the best DPs shoot sharp and with deep focus.” Like people so often assumes a trend = bad, and the mindset should be more about finding what you need for the specific project not worrying about what other creatives are over using or under utilizing. *bridgerton films on arri signature prime lenses