German Army information channel!
You will find here information about the German Army in WW2, German Army size, German Army equipment, German Army uniform, German Army ranks and much, much more....
Welcome to War&History.
I'm a military historian and this is a STRICTLY non-political history channel.
NEW videos every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
War&History shows epic battles and military units from the past and present.
Explore what it was like to be in the trenches of the First World War.
Fight in the streets of Stalingrad!
Watch, Learn and Enjoy!
Пікірлер
Moskau =hell !
Dude, I told you in another video that you need to phonetically change the German words so they sound German, not English. It's Pie-per, not Pay-per. You have to change the worded script so the robot can read it and pronounce it right.
AH☠️ was an idiot.. of course. I just watched a video about the German nuclear science program. Turns out that THEY were way ahead of the Allies and with the 'heavy water' concept very well could have developed a small bomb BEFORE the 1941 invasion. Just think of the reaction to the World had he nuked Moscow! You KNOW he would have ordered it! The Japs would take the 'Northern Strategy' and bye, BYE USSR💀
Imagine if people worked on their diplomatic skills as much as they work on creating weapons and wage war.
camp-grop-paper... this is bad.
I HATE AI Voice, why do people feel the need to use that sh*t... The video would be ok if it wasnt for that!
GREAT VIDEO...
Great pilot but a nazie right till the end .
i am not aware of any other books that cover this subject
Interesting video. Thank you!
A couple of points I know: 1/ The Lotfe 7 was not a copy of the Norden. Wolfgang W.E. Samuel, a USAAF Veteran, wrote the book "American Raiders: The Race to Capture the Luftwaffe's Secrets. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2004. ISBN 1-57806-649-2" and in it the Raiders interviewed Zeiss engineers and found out that the engineers had never seen the plans for the Norden or knew about it until they had been presented captured versions in 1942 by which time the Lotfe 7B was in service. If the Norden did influence the Germans it was minimal, perhaps it caused them to start development of their own computing sight. 2/ The Lotfe 7B the optics, gyros and computing was in one combined box instead of Separate units which made it more compact than the Norden and easier to keep maintained and aligned. It also suited the smaller German bombers. 3/ The big problem was the Lotfe 7B was not available till 1942, had it been available earlier perhaps the wasteful investment in dive bombing for the He 177, Ju 288 and even Ju 88 could have been avoided. The USN and then USAAF had the Norden in service for almost 10 years by then. 4/ The Lotfe 7B was very accurate. In 1943 three Fw 200C Condors attacked "Convoy Faith" of the Azores from 15,000ft and sank or burned out 3 over 5 attack runs between them. They also had near misses on warships firing back at them (Sloop, corvette and destroyer) which were firing at the Fw 200 but took evasive outmaneuvers to avoid the falling bombs. After this the allies used aircraft carriers. 5/ The British equal was called the SABS II (Stabilized Automatic Bomb Sight) which came into service a little latter. 6/ The forerunner of the SABS the ABS , Lotfe 7A and Early Norden all didn't have stabilization and thus worked poorly. 7/ The computing techniques and methods used in all these sights were used in Naval Gunner, Anti Aircraft gunnery, Torpedo aiming. They were just reduced in size for bomb sights so there never really was a secret. 8/ At the same time as the Lotfe 7B was entering service the shallow dive bombing sight the StuVi 5B when equipped with the BZA computer allowed Ju 88 to dive bomb at 22 degrees or less with the dive brakes removed. The Dive would begin at 8000ft and bomb release and pull up complete by 5000ft with the bomber at 400mph TAS by that time. The Lotfe 7 was used to measure wind speed and position the Ju 88 and commence the optimal dive point. It was very accurate and bomb hits close enough to disable tanks was common. Often used by Finnish Airforce.
In its Battle of the Bulge Hollywood film 🎥 🎞 in 1965 British born movie 🎬 🎞 🎥 actor Robert Shaw has been guest stared as Colonel Hessler but not Joachim Peiper in its Battle of the Bulge Hollywood film 🎥 🎞.
Joachim Peiper is responsible for the Malmedy Massacre at about 1:30pm on Sunday,December 17th, 1944.As it is portrayed later in its Battle of the Bulge Hollywood film 🎥 25 years later on December 16th, 1965.The 25th anniversary of the real Battle of the Bulge in 1944 during WWII and the US 🇺🇸 Presidential election year which makes Franklin Delano Roosevelt to be relected again on his 4th term. In which Battle of the Bulge Hollywood film 🎥 🎞 has been released by Warner Brothers and Cinerama in 1965.Which is filmed 🎥 on location in Spain 🇪🇸.
Bombs gone
1943 film, Bombardier. @0:27 Co-starred Eddie Albert. I don't get how he was at the battle of Tarawa which also happened in 1943. Clone?
1 year is a long time jan 43 film & tarawa dec 43 everything was speeded up in ww2
Brave Heroes
Well you butchered the names in that video maybe a real human voice next time don't you think
men!!!!! not naziś but GERMANS stop share german propaganda !!!! that was german soldiers ,policman and civilian who atack and after surender murder all resistants, GERMAN who fight for 1000 yers old Rich !!! not for planet nazistan
I miss the Old Narrator .
Thanks to these victims of WW1 and Dr Gillies the influencers today has a lot to be thankful for. I really dislike these superficial influencers. They should have been s*hot instead.
Looks cool.
Centaur has at least 105mm cannon. Not sure maybe 120mm..its cool.
Holy Moly, this guy can't even pronounce the names of places in Germany.
Wow
Colossal disaster.
Why is this so goddamn hard to find
Could becexplainedvbetter#
If you fear WW3, you deserve to live in a world where it never occurs
Super presentation. Thank you
incredible what humans can achieve and also endure. Awesome video.
kzread.info/dash/bejne/a2iL17V8nprKdrg.htmlsi=rSeSsHhoC7WqKidJ Example of a well made ai narratation video
Hey man theres, much beter ai voices available now. I think your one the only youtubers who uses actualy researched sources for these videos instead of the first wikipedia article. I would have no issue sharing your content if the ai voice would be a bit beter quality. Also there seems to be very litlle info on the combat record of the king tigers on the eastern front.
So Joe Chim Paper was defeated at a Save-a-Lot store? I guess they don't sell many bilingual AI voices. I did like the 'Tiger Too Heavy tank.'
Get rid of the AI narration. The mispronounced words ruins the video.
I wonder if these resources were used on the Eastern front, would the Nazis have been able to hold the Russians, allowing the western allies to take Berlin instead 🤔 maybe saving a lot of grief later on.
AI voice should ne illegal
It's artificial, and clearly NOT Intelligent
This is my vibe
HERRVORAGENDES ZEITDOKUMENT❤
BOT can't pronounce the words correctly 🙄😵💫
Good vid but cmon that AI narrative stinks.
It's doesn't Stink it it Suxs. The AI voice has destroyed the Channel.
Peiper, not paper.
AI reader
Logistics is always the "achilles heel" in a war zone.
Achilles heel? No, it's the foundation on which you build a successful campaign and the Germans didn't have any to begin with.
@@PatGilliland So you were there?
What modern army used horses other than Germany? Their lack of standardized mechanized supply lines was their downfall @@flycatchful
@@naciremasti German and Soviet armies relied heavily on work horses to pull artillery and supplies. Horses seemed to be a cheap and reliable transport especially in the spring and fall mud of the Eastern Front but the associated costs of daily feeding, grooming and handling horses were staggering.
@@flycatchful and unsustainable.
I think SS also had panzer divisions; Himmler didn't want to be left out.
Didn´t know that those ships where in the national socialist party......what you learn on videos like this. Wonder how they applied?
Grand Slam was never dropped from the height Barnes Wallis originally intended. He designed the ‘Victory Bomber’, a 6 engined pressurised plane designed to drop the ten ton bomb from up to 40,000’/12,192m. It was never built but a model was wind tunnel tested and the model still exists at The Brooklands Museum. The Lancaster B1 Special, the Lancasters modified to carry Grand Slam could never get higher than perhaps 22,000’/6,705m so it would be interesting to see how the bomb would have performed if dropped from the designed altitude.
if only we had built tanks like this powered with rolls Royce Merlin Packard engines. would have been a devastating combo but no General Lesley James McNair fucked us over and said no to US heavy tanks and what they called a medium tank was really a light tank with way too small of a gun. and then all the excuses of its to big toove across the Atlantic, well build a bigger ship god damnit kick some ass and get it done.
There was an earlier armoured car with just an MG or 20mm cannon, but it looked like it drove facing the other direction (ie: the long nose first). I forget the designation but the chassis looks almost identical. Is the 234/2 just one of those chassis’s, but backwards?? I’m very curious if anyone knows.
Interesting video 👍
A very interesting take on this. However, though I think the Murmansk convoys could have been severed with enough effort from the Germans. I don't think the same of the other two ports/sources - though I found your reasoning very interesting. Obviously, the Soviets would have put large numbers of fighters to protect the railroads east of Omsk and the port of Astrakkan. The He-111 was cut to pieces over Britain in 1940 without fighter escort. I assume the same fate would have befallen them in Russia. And as for mining the port of Vladivostok? I seriously doubt they could continuously mine the port's waters. As obviously each time they did so, the Russians would just clear them with minesweepers. Plus, I assume the Soviets would place large numbers of ASW assets at the port to stop these attacks. Even if the Germans mass-produced the Type X boats, I don't think they could keep that port closed for more than a token amount of time. Now, if the Germans had planned for this scenario and designed/built long range fighters of superior capability to escort their bombers? Plus, much larger bombers to be escorted? Then maybe they could have really taken a bite out of the supplies the USSR was getting. Perhaps is General Wever had removed the aileron gust locks on his plane before his final flight? He would not have been killed and Germany might have developed a great, long range heavy bomber (Ural Bomber). Fortunately for the world - he didn't. Either way, I applaud your ideas and explanations. Thank you for this excellent and thought provoking video. ☮
I love the panzer 4 tbh. Just seeing that barrel and the design looks good. ❤