Пікірлер

• 
  @user-re3ge1oc6n4 минут бұрын

  شکریہ سر جی شاداب رہیں صوفی محمد اصغر ایم اے فلاسفی گوجرانولہ

• 
  @shilviablog993318 минут бұрын

  Excellent guys u rocked it 😊💗

• 
  @user-rl2cb3os3c33 минут бұрын

  یا اللہ ہمارے ملک پر رحم فرمائے آمین جو لوگوں اس کے دشمن ہے ان لوگوں کو دنیا آخرت میں ذلت رسوائی عطاء فرمائے آمین 🤲💕🤲

• 
  @Maazkhan-py8nr57 минут бұрын

  sir, Maazrat per apki Islam kay lehaz se boht he weak Knowledge hay fiqh kiya hay aur Islamic laws kiya hay? Apnay sb koch Mix kardiya kiya keh rahay hon sir ap ko koch pata bhi hay ye jo 4 kholafa goozray hay us waqt to ek bhi fiqh nahi the lekin uskay laws aur principles kiya thay? asay principles kay abhi tak us jese ek bhi hokoomat nahi ayee hay please sir jb kese cheez kay baray may elm nahi to please kesi se rabta karay

• 
  @Taimur_Laal33 минут бұрын

  Exactly. Good point. I can show that even at that time the laws were changing. See my lecture on Hazrat Umar ra.

• 
  @Taimur_Laal32 минут бұрын

  Have a look at this Maaz. kzread.info/dash/bejne/lmymvLiNaLCbfZc.htmlsi=b4fKS7pZ_biCSF8r

• 
  @hamad_inAI_7Сағат бұрын

  Thats why Sunnah is important which is guided by ALLAH swt so resulting Laws from Sunnah are actually given by ALLAH SWT

• 
  @Harmain57Сағат бұрын

  ***Reproductive Human Cloning***

• 
  @hamidmamdani54322 сағат бұрын

  Great Job To Bring Out So Many Topics Of Early Islamic Age Never Heard As A Common Man Very Interesting,Clearly Knowledgeable Thanks

• 
  @syedwaqifdad11062 сағат бұрын

  Love you Sir your work is just awesome

• 
  @parjanyashukla1762 сағат бұрын

  Whatever be the case, it is not an issue for Punjabis to discuss. Both Hindi and Urdu are standard versions of Khadiboli (with some Awadhi influences) which is a dialect of Gangetic valley. Punjabis shouldn't create useless issues and create headache for the entire world. It's like Japanese speakers discussing whether British and American English are just accents or two different dialects.

• 
  @electronicsurdupakistan91812 сағат бұрын

  Why u did not answer that some laws are complet in quran as u mentioned Ur self...... answer u know it that Ur maktba shaytan ghamdi has failed u , are u even a PhD?

• 
  @Taimur_Laal27 минут бұрын

  I did answer. I said there are a few. Not a complete set. Other laws have to be derived.

• 
  @Ameen114374 сағат бұрын

  My age is 43 my Question is how a common man increase his intelligent wisdom getting knowledge what are resources of increase wisdom

• 
  @Progressive-Discourse4 сағат бұрын

  Abdus Salam's real truth with irrefutable proofs kzread.info/dash/bejne/oneapraQedKvc84.html

• 
  @GhulamMuhammad-vh8up4 сағат бұрын

  Sir hazrat Muhammad sallah o walayhe wasalam k wisal k baad aisa koie Low nahi k muslim ummah ko kon lead karagay tu Quran Ki aik ayaat jis ka urdu turjuma kuch ye hai K "aye imaan waloun jab kisi muskil main pahans jau tu Allah ki rasi ko thaam lu"lahaza iman waloun ny Allah ki rasi Parker Li or Abu. Baker ko apna kalefa bana lia By ishtaq Hussain qurashi former head of history dep Karachi university

• 
  @alirazasyed27636 сағат бұрын

  Very effective

• 
  @bhatsibgatullah44626 сағат бұрын

  You have clearly attempted to demean the "2.45%" of the total āyāt of the Qur'ān by saying that 97.55% of the Quran has nothing to do with laws, state and the related things. I can only lament your understanding. You tell me, there is a single verse in the Quran that says "The only dīn acceptable in front of Allah is Islām, and whosoever adopts anything except Islām won't be accepted from him"..! By applying your understanding of this matter, does it mean this verse is not that important? As it makes just 0.016% of the total verse of the Quran. #Go to the Quran, open and read it by dropping your presuppositions first.

• 
  @alirazasyed27636 сағат бұрын

  Allah bless you Comrade

• 
  @alirazasyed27636 сағат бұрын

  Well done comrade

• 
  @user-qe7di7vm9n6 сағат бұрын

  Excellent way to explain

• 
  @ijazawan78657 сағат бұрын

  How can you make laws form the Qur'anic principles when there are different opinions 180 degree apart. The case of Talaq ki Infront of you. So how to decide on which interpretation we should make law. Apart from this Quran has narrated very very long stories but mentioned no simple procedure for Talaq, Namaz .Hajj which are very basic things

• 
  @hamad_inAI_7Сағат бұрын

  Because it's mentioned in Sunnah

• 
  @ijazawan7865Сағат бұрын

  @@hamad_inAI_7 From the same Sunna books etc different olama have reached opposite results. If Quran ki ambiguous then Sunna etc is also not giving good results it's giving confusion. You did not get my comment. It's self explanatory.

• 
  @ijazawan7865Сағат бұрын

  @@hamad_inAI_7 every olama claim that they have deduced this result from Sunna and hadees and irony is that after great effort they give nothing but confusion

• 
  @hamad_inAI_745 минут бұрын

  @@ijazawan7865 22 points were presented by Ullema in 1950s that we all agree on this, implement this Which means all they need is a Dialogue just like Theodore Hertzel did for all Jews,he simply called Jews from around the world with same problems and brought them on same page!

• 
  @ijazawan78657 сағат бұрын

  Sir point to ponder for you all Quran has principles but the problem is that given the same verse of Quran there are different interpretations for example Talaq ka principle quran mn given hai but is k bawjood bhi different olama and sects different results par pohanchty hn. My point is that k aesay halaat mn Quran ka kia faida jb specific quranic principle sy ik Law par consensus nhi ho sakta

• 
  @Sportshighlightscentral3597 сағат бұрын

  Bechary ko views chahy

• 
  @Sportshighlightscentral3597 сағат бұрын

  Afsoos Dr.Israr aj hothy

• 
  @Philosopher-ey6qg7 сағат бұрын

  Amazing sir brilliant analysis

• 
  @Sportshighlightscentral3597 сағат бұрын

  😂😂😂 Apny barhy achy tareeky sy ghalat information dy kar apny apko Panothi Zaher keya Apky ha illuminati thu bas aam logg hai tera Demagh Allah apni jaga py lay

• 
  @taimoorsheikh92878 сағат бұрын

  The only thing prophet Muhammad left as a succesor is Imam Ali,not even Quran

• 
  @sheheryartalks7 сағат бұрын

  In that case You're Illetrate. The place where Prophet PBUH left MAULA ALI as his successor, at the same moment he Declared QURAN the only source of Light and key to Success (ofc in terms of After Life) 😇

• 
  @EssamExplore7 сағат бұрын

  Delusional

• 
  @taimoorsheikh92876 сағат бұрын

  @@sheheryartalksNo one had the whole Quran except Imam Ali,even Omer,Aisha,Ibn e masood,ibne omer,ibne Abbas considers Quran uncomplete,After the death of prophet Imam Ali brought the full Quran to Abubakr to spread it across but that dumbfook rejected

• 
  @taimoorsheikh92876 сағат бұрын

  @@EssamExplore stop chirping,go read Authentic references ,the topic is Ayat e Rajam and Ayat e Raza e kabeer

• 
  @Sportshighlightscentral3598 сағат бұрын

  Brothers and sisters ye time KZread py followers our views ka chal raha hai Bina kesi famous our Great personality ka name ley baghair Channel kaisay agy barhy ga ye b thu sochna hai

• 
  @Sportshighlightscentral3598 сағат бұрын

  Jo bathy apny ki hai yahi misunderstanding Jews spread karna chahty thy our apny promote keya Sirf aik nahi sari bathy apny Dr.Israr ki ghalat predict ki pehly kaha thy ap Dr.Israr k Zamany mai hothy thu waha crowd mai usko daar ki waja sy sunty ab wo nahi hai thu unky name py followers our views ley rahy hu Apna knowledge share karo without mentioning him and uploading his thumbnail phir dektha hu tujy kue dektha hai ya nahi

• 
  @Sportshighlightscentral3598 сағат бұрын

  Apk sir mai jetny ball hai s sy zyada Dr.Israr Ahmad ko history ka patha hai Followers our views agar chahiy thu musician ya dancer ya v logger bannu

• 
  @A.SMotivation-ii1wk8 сағат бұрын

  ❤❤❤ great sir

• 
  @nowie40078 сағат бұрын

  ❤❤❤❤❤

• 
  @Ahmad-yi6d8 сағат бұрын

  Very Well Explained Sir ❤

• 
  @jerryjohnjoseph9 сағат бұрын

  ❤

• 
  @faisalmeer10739 сағат бұрын

  Well explained.

• 
  @shaha878310 сағат бұрын

  درست بات ہے قرآن صرف اصول دیتا ہے ۔ان پارٹیوں سے اللہ کی پناہ

• 
  @aftab41810 сағат бұрын

  Sir g bohat mushkil krdete ho AP bt samaj nhi ata kch b 😀😀😀😀

• 
  @rafiaansari340610 сағат бұрын

  This is exactly what I have understood after 10 years of studying the Quran and various Islamic subjects.

• 
  @ijazawan7865Сағат бұрын

  Quran Gives a verse (Principle) then using that verse different olama reach a conflicting result and make conflicting laws. After great efforts the olama just confused us. e.g Talaq Ka masla, Wali k bghair nikah, namaz and Hajj Ka treqa even wuzu par bhi ikhtalaaf ha jiski Ayat clearly quran mn ha

• 
  @advocatehafiznasirmahmood598010 сағат бұрын

  Good like always ❤❤❤

• 
  @oyster454511 сағат бұрын

  General principles of God Man's law and Science

• 
  @HammadHaider-oj9pf11 сағат бұрын

  well my captain

• 
  @pakistanstudies569711 сағат бұрын

  Sir please make vedios lect On the history of civil military relationships how it was started the before partaion

• 
  @IbrahimNoorani-ns6ud11 сағат бұрын

  Sir respectfully I would request that u stick to philosophy and not delve into subject of which you've no clue. Ur analysis will only strengthen the misguided beliefs of polemics.

• 
  @Taimur_Laal8 сағат бұрын

  Thanks for your advice. But you didn’t say what I said was wrong?

• 
  @thesphinxfactor11 сағат бұрын

  Sab bas daaway hain aur kuchh nahi. Yeh sab insaan ki soch ki takhleeq hai aur kuchh nahi.

• 
  @shahidsardar105811 сағат бұрын

  وا استاد جی۔ ویڈیو بنانے کا شکریہ۔

• 
  @zarosh88-ul2hv12 сағат бұрын

  Lets say UNIVERSAL LAW (GOD's LAW} and LOCAL LAW (MAN'S LAW). I fail to understand why you take MULLAYIAT and PEERI and MURDI as ISLAM why not you follow IQBAL RA Interpretation of ISLAM that is the basis of the foundation of PAKISTAN.

• 
  @amjadfiaz483012 сағат бұрын

  Sai kaha ha sr g further b keci personality ka 7 v log karay please

• 
  @NinjaThinker13 сағат бұрын

  Am 54 years old and Am your student sir ❤

• 
  @farukchoudhury93413 сағат бұрын

  After studying the Sharia Laws, someone commented -"Not God's Laws, but Man's flaws".

• 
  @Islamicepistemology20 минут бұрын

  If hv no knowledge of islam then better to mouth shut up...what do you know about islamic jurisprudence...

• 
  @junaidakbar873813 сағат бұрын

  تیمور صاحب بالکل صحیح اور صاف بات کی آپ نے. بے شک قانون کی بنیاد اصول پر ہوتی ہے. اسلام نے اصول زیادہ دئیے ہیں اور قوانین کم. مگر آپ سوشلزم کے قوانین کی بات کریں گے جو معاشی سیاسی اور معاشرتی امور چلائیں گے تو وہ کارل مارکس کے جدلیاتی فلسفہ و فکر پر مبنی ہوگا. یعنی جو اصول بنیں گے وہ کم و بیش کارل مارکس کے دئیے گئے نظریہ حیات کی روشنی میں ہی بنیں گے. اب فلسفہ اور اصول بھی کارل مارکس دے رہے ہیں اور قوانین بھی انسان اخذ کر رہے ہیں. تو اصول بھی انسان کے بنائے ہوئے ہیں قوانین بھی انسان ہی اخذ کررہا ہے. جبکہ اگر ایک اسلامی نظام کی بات کی جائیگی تو وہاں منبعِ اصول کسی انسان کا دیا ہوا فلسفہ یا فکر نہیں ہوگا بلکہ وہ اصول اور ہدایت خود خدا تعالى کی طرف سے دئیے گئے ہین. قوانین اپنے دور کے حالات و ضروریات کے مطابق قرآن کی ہی مقرر کردہ حدود کے اندر رہ کر انسان خود اخذ کریں گے. اب اصول خدا دے رہا ہے اور قانون انسان خود اخد کررہا ہے جو کم و بیش انہیں اصولوں کے تابع ہونگے. زمین آسمان کا فرق ہے دونوں میں

• 
  @bravojl13 сағат бұрын

  Dear Dr Sahib, what is the comparison between Hadith codifying by Imam Bukhari and Fiqh ? Shah bukhari isn’t the first Hadith book,its the first Hadith book in “Sahih” movement which is different from earlier compilation of Hadith, Musnaf abi Sheena,Musnaf Abdu Razzaq were written way before that and they survived, there are some other compilations too, so please if you are presenting your argument please check your appropriations of claims before posting it.

• 
  @Taimur_Laal8 сағат бұрын

  yes. Of course. But they are not authoritative. And the principle was not established till Imam Shafi.

• 
  @user-ut7ep7wg8v2 сағат бұрын

  Qanoon insan banata hai isko agr maan lein, tu jo Quran mein qanoon hein agr koi unky khilaf qanoon bnae tu AP ki is bary mein kia rae hai, ya koi halal cheez ko Haram krly, second Jo Fiqh compile hui wo Quran aur Hadith sy rahnumai ligi or iska ye matlab nai Jo Banda uthy Fiqh ko murattab krly, is ke liye qualifications required Hoti thi na ke Har shaks uthy or qanoon bana ly jesy democratic countries mein hota hai

• 
  @muhammadnouman151513 сағат бұрын

  Apko itni smjh na ai, ka agr asool Allah ki kitab sa liya gy han to , un usool sa jo bhi qanoon bnen gy wo Allah ka asool ka mutabiq hon gy. Na ka insan apni marzi Ka asoll (principles) ka according qanoon bnana start kr den. Agr apka hath main mice han, to theek bat agy ponchyn ya farz ha ap pa. There is a hell of difference between laws extracted from principles of Allah and man. Man made principles are selfishly for some particular sector of people nor for all humankind.