CXCY誠心呈義

CXCY誠心呈義

我們相信作為基督的忠心信徒,傳揚福音不只是我們要做的事情,而是我們基督徒終生的職志。我們既然被選召為成為傳福音的工人,我們就為傳揚福音禱告、奉獻、裝備自己並且為主做工,因此我們可以活出沒有虧欠的人生。因著這個理念,誠心呈義福音事工秉持著為基督信徒和慕道者服事的態度,競競業業地在這個頻道上致力於製作優質的神學教育節目。

Пікірлер

  • @shingmarahcheung300
    @shingmarahcheung300Сағат бұрын

    如果不看最後3分鐘,前面37分鐘就白看了。信主不容易呀,返教會、看聖經、唱詩歌容易,要以主耶穌為生命的價值觀、時刻愛祂,想念祂,相信祂,討祂喜悅可難了。

  • @user-ny2xn1wy4e
    @user-ny2xn1wy4e4 сағат бұрын

    好在仁慈的神依然創造了許多不把同性戀認為是罪的教會和信徒,讓我們可以有所選擇,感謝主~

  • @yingfengchung7291
    @yingfengchung729116 сағат бұрын

    莊老師:我不覺得馬太10-34及以後的經文有矛盾 耶穌比喻傳福音就是一場革命,傳福音過程艱辛,殉職,逼迫,下監 但信仰的革命帶來重生的喜悅與平安。

  • @chiao2955
    @chiao295521 сағат бұрын

    若不是因著主,誰能有辦法學習饒恕。哭到不行耶....謝謝老師介紹Amish還有槍殺的事件。

  • @maysun6222
    @maysun6222Күн бұрын

    我可以自己回答我刚才自己提出的问题了。我以科学和尊重事实尊重历史的态度了解并继续了解《圣经》的形成之后,我依旧可以成为基督徒,而且是真正的表里统一的基督徒。我信耶和华,我信耶稣,我不信的只是和我在同一个教会的一部分弟兄姐妹或者牧师的部分说词,因为人的理解能力、理性思维能力是不同的,我没有必要在教会里和他们争论。但是,我的内心永远对自己真实,对圣灵感应敞开,我不与他人争论,但我不说谎话。我渴望遇到与庄老师一样,以虔诚但尊重事实的态度去阅读《圣经》并坚持自己的基督信仰的真正的弟兄姐妹,并一起在归向主的道路上前进。谢谢庄老师!

  • @maysun6222
    @maysun6222Күн бұрын

    庄老师:您说得太好了。

  • @maysun6222
    @maysun6222Күн бұрын

    庄老师:我特别希望知道,您以科学的态度了解了《圣经》的来源之后,您还可以成为基督徒吗?

  • @xiaonanwang1491
    @xiaonanwang14912 күн бұрын

    诺亚被儿子含看见下体,咒诅含的儿子迦南。当时迦南还没有出生。迦南这个名字是早就知道的吗?

  • @CXCY
    @CXCYКүн бұрын

    如果當時迦南還没有出生,諾亞咒詛的是含的兒子,迦南這個名字是後來加上去的。

  • @huichen2470
    @huichen24702 күн бұрын

    庄老师请问我家先生没有好好读圣经 也不知道圣经有几卷但他就是想要受洗成为基督徒,因为他自己感受到耶稣的奇妙,但牧师说他基本圣经都不熟悉 不建议受洗,让他熟悉以后再来 ,请问他可以受洗吗?

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY2 күн бұрын

    每個教會都有他們的受洗資格要求,這位牧師的說法没有錯,你先生需要多了解基督信仰再決志信主,免得受洗以後,不明白信仰要義,將來自己絆倒了也絆倒人。

  • @user-dz7gf8ek6m
    @user-dz7gf8ek6m2 күн бұрын

    谢谢庄老师!❤️❤️👍👍👍👍👍非常敬佩您!❤️❤️❤️💐💐💐

  • @JoeLam-iq5bc
    @JoeLam-iq5bc3 күн бұрын

    莊老師曾經說過,聖經有誤但不是全部有誤,最起碼的 主耶穌基督道成肉身,為人類的罪被釘十字架是確實無誤的,莊老師說您以後會做節目說到這個話題,不知道莊老師什麼時候給大家說一下?謝謝您!

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY3 күн бұрын

    以後會說

  • @JoeLam-iq5bc
    @JoeLam-iq5bc2 күн бұрын

    @@CXCY 感恩莊老師。

  • @JoeLam-iq5bc
    @JoeLam-iq5bc3 күн бұрын

    莊老師: 您好。想請教老師一個問題,有很多個案說經歷過瀕死體驗的人曾經經歷過類似隧道的空間,然後到過天堂或地獄,曾經見過 主耶穌基督或其他宗教的神佛。當中有這種體驗的不乏無神論者,不知道老師對這方面有研究嗎?您認為可信嗎?謝謝老師!

  • @waynewong9812
    @waynewong98123 күн бұрын

    感謝主,謝謝分享❤

  • @juanqinzhuang7828
    @juanqinzhuang78284 күн бұрын

    感谢主, 信耶稣。 不凭眼见。

  • @doolores3934
    @doolores39344 күн бұрын

    庄老师,我关注您的节目已经很久了,我十几岁信主至今也有十四年了,但惭愧地说我始终会怀疑。原因也是因为考古,生物学这些专业科目方面的证据与圣经记载的不符。但是我有时候又会在看到某些非宗教内容的文字或者听某些节目的时候体验到感动。所以我很困惑,如果连圣经都存在矛盾,而人类历史发展几千年,总有人为自己的目的能操弄文字,那我要怎么在这些迷障中倾听神的话语,并相信这就是神要告诉我的?先谢谢解答

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY4 күн бұрын

    謝謝你持續關注我的節目,我也是從聖經開始了解神的話語的,但是因為後來在生命的道路上,神帶領我在神學的路上,讓我走了聖經研究的路,我遇見許多人問我:如果聖經有誤,我們如何知道聖經中記載耶穌的話保證確實「無誤」?而不是後人修改、添加甚至偽造的?答案是:没有辦法保證。只能透過分析耶穌一貫的言行教導,再比較其他福音書的記載以及歷史考古佐證,來判斷是不是後人修改、添加甚至偽造的,即使如此,也不是百分之百。但是儘管如此,神依然會帶領我們,藉著聖靈啟示我們,什麼才是神要我們走的道路,比方說:以巴戰爭,我們讀舊約,聖經告訴我們: 神在以色列一方,敵對以色列的都是神的仇敵,而耶穌告訴我們要愛仇敵,你該怎麼做?對我而言,我選擇相信耶穌,因為耶穌是唯一的真理。但我也相信舊約聖經告訴以色列的:所以,你們要謹守遵行我一切的律例、典章,免得我領你們去住的那地把你們吐出。因為神是公義的,不會偏袒任何一方。希望這些話對你有幫助,我在未來節目會特別講這些議題。

  • @doolores3934
    @doolores39344 күн бұрын

    @@CXCY谢谢庄老师的解答!我也会持续祷告!

  • @croissant0329
    @croissant03295 күн бұрын

    謝謝!

  • @user-es3pr6mb8u
    @user-es3pr6mb8u5 күн бұрын

    謝謝莊老師解經!

  • @elijahlaukokchai
    @elijahlaukokchai5 күн бұрын

    庄老师是个学者,能否做实验或研究,或找一找一些类似的资料。就是一群人一同经历一些特殊事情,叫几个人来描述这件事情的经过,尽量描述所有细节,看看有没有矛盾。

  • @lalalalala-fx4dn
    @lalalalala-fx4dn5 күн бұрын

    请问迦南地一开始是含的儿子迦南的吗

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY5 күн бұрын

    迦南本是人名,他是挪亞的孫子,含的兒子(創9:18, 22)。根據代上1:8,迦南是含四個兒子中的小兒子。在洪水之後,挪亞的後代分散在地上,迦南的後代就被稱為「迦南人」,居住在聖經中被稱為流奶與蜜的美地,這塊地也就被稱為「迦南地」。迦南生了西頓(出了舊約中最邪惡的婦人耶洗別)、赫、耶布斯人(佔領了耶路撒冷)、亞摩利人(也是迦南人的另一稱呼)、革迦撒人、希未人等十一個民族(創10:15-18)。後來摩西吩咐以色列人進入美地之後,必須將那裡所住的赫人、革迦撒人、亞摩利人、迦南人、比利洗人、希未人、耶布斯人,共七國的民除滅(申7:1)。

  • @chiao2955
    @chiao29555 күн бұрын

    愛 才是神要我們背的軛。(哭惹,謝謝莊老師QQ 好棒的教導

  • @ChenTanTan-lp3bt
    @ChenTanTan-lp3bt5 күн бұрын

    神会保守使徒们不出错吗,不会。你看使徒们常犯错被耶稣责备。既然这样,神也不会保守写圣经的人记忆无误。记错是正常的。有些圣经错误就是错误。比如说犹大两种去世的说法。很多错就是错。一直坚持圣经没错等于是说写圣经的人都没错,等于说写圣经的人都是完美圣人如同以诺,约伯,但以理,耶稣吗,没那么多完美人。就说人会记错会写错会理解错。解答完毕。执着于错误的神学是很累的。

  • @user-tu3vz2pz9e
    @user-tu3vz2pz9e2 күн бұрын

    那这样就会有另一个问题面对,神经是否无误了,因为现在很多说法就是,圣经没有错的,都是真理

  • @user-ib6il3lk1j
    @user-ib6il3lk1jКүн бұрын

    縱使聖經中,似乎有一些問題,基本上:其教訓,督責,糾正,學義都是正確的!領受,遵行才重要!問題的小部分,可以研究,但不要妨礙跟隨耶穌,順從聖靈,榮耀天父!!!些​@@user-tu3vz2pz9e

  • @user-cn9gi2lv5h
    @user-cn9gi2lv5h5 күн бұрын

    看到庄老师的讲解很有启发🎉

  • @jianboshan5167
    @jianboshan51675 күн бұрын

    感谢神!

  • @ckhckh506
    @ckhckh5065 күн бұрын

    莊老師的節目太難,但我也只能照着教導,憑信心去信耶穌。

  • @ChenTanTan-lp3bt
    @ChenTanTan-lp3bt5 күн бұрын

    @@user-qm6oo9he6r 你认为圣经没错的话,要回答一下吗,耶稣吩咐耶稣去传福音,是否要带拐杖?我就一头雾水了。还有就是犹大怎么去世的呢

  • @loojack6019
    @loojack60195 күн бұрын

    兄弟,你坚持每天祷告,会有奇妙经历。你自己经历的是你的。你听别人说的,毕竟是别人的知识。

  • @user-ig3nq1sq4h
    @user-ig3nq1sq4h5 күн бұрын

    有牧師回答應,怎知道8歲登基不是由父子兩人共同治理?當年口傳難免有誤抄,不管8歲或18歲,並不違背耶穌的真理(約雅斤)

  • @user-ms3dp5cg1g
    @user-ms3dp5cg1g5 күн бұрын

    差10岁差的太多了。

  • @cosdonmai
    @cosdonmai5 күн бұрын

    不能更動的應該是指舊約的希伯來原文及新約的希臘文本,很多版本譯者都在不明原文意時直接從字面翻造成很多誤解,可以從中文合和本是從聖公會欽定版直翻看出,語意己經己和原文十萬八千里遠了;而數字的錯誤應是可原諒的失誤,畢竟有些人對數字並不敏感的

  • @EriksonLiu
    @EriksonLiu5 күн бұрын

    耶穌對他說:「你因看見了我才信,那沒有看見就信的有福了!」

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY5 күн бұрын

    耶穌這句話是什麼意思呢?是說我們要看見證據才相信耶穌?還是聖經?耶穌這句話真正的意思是說:門徒如何相信耶穌已經復活?他們看見了復活的主,才相信耶穌的話。而我們没有看見耶穌釘十字架,也没有看見耶穌復活,我們如何相信耶穌已經復活?我們就是主耶穌所說那些沒有看見就相信的人。使徒們將目擊的事實記錄下來,中間是有矛盾誤缪的,我們能夠讀到這些事,不是叫我們要相信聖經,而是要叫我們相信耶穌。謝謝你的奉獻,但是我願你相信的是耶穌,而不是聖經這本書。

  • @moyeung9920
    @moyeung99205 күн бұрын

    @@CXCY 不好意思, 我一直有個問題, 如果我們信了耶穌, 是不是比門徒們更有福呢?

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY5 күн бұрын

    從耶穌的話來回答你:是的,事實上,大多數的門徒雖然跟隨耶穌多年,但是一直不了解耶穌,後來看見耶穌釘十字架,看見耶穌復活,耶穌從前教導他們的話才對他們產生影響,他們後來殉道證明了這一點。但是我要補充你的論述,我們「信」了耶穌,也就是耶穌所教導的一切,不是相信「耶穌」是三位一體,會賜我們永生這類表面上的話,是你要放棄一切世上的,包括錢財、家庭、個人思維⋯去跟從耶穌,才算「信」耶穌,如果你真的「信」耶穌,你一定會比門徒們更有福,因為你没有看見耶穌釘十字架,也没有看見耶穌復活,但是你相信耶穌,根據耶穌的話,你要比門徒們更有福。

  • @nicoleschowalter2820
    @nicoleschowalter28206 күн бұрын

    我个人的经历 我目前所在的教会 每当有女性教士 上台讲道的时候,证道的内容 讲的乱乱的 整个堂会氛围也感觉软弱. (总之属灵那种氛围很奇怪 我说不上来哪里奇怪.

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY6 күн бұрын

    你們教會邀請的女性講道員,不能代表所有有心服事的姐妹,還有一點,當男性,特別是比較没有經驗的講道員,表達不佳時,往往得到比較多的諒解,而女性講道員表達不佳時,很多人就用女人本來就不可以講道來批評,這算是性別岐視,在教會中不該這麼做。

  • @guokuiqiao7491
    @guokuiqiao74916 күн бұрын

    谢谢庄老师的整理,我还有一个困惑的问题,可耶稣的话也是被人整理过的,我们如何保证这记录确实无误?如果他的门徒可以为他们想要的神学完全编造希律王杀婴的故事,这算不算说谎?我们如何相信其他没有矛盾的地方?会不会耶稣说的话有部分也是删减过或者添加过的?

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY6 күн бұрын

    耶穌的話如何保證確實「無誤」?而不是後人修改、添加甚至偽造的?答案是:没有辦法保證。只能透過分析耶穌一貫的言行教導,再比較其他福音書的記載以及歷史考古佐證,來判斷是不是後人修改、添加甚至偽造的,即使如此,也不是百分之百。

  • @guokuiqiao7491
    @guokuiqiao74916 күн бұрын

    @@CXCY 谢谢庄老师的回复,如果如此,这会不会让遵守神的教导变得很主观?如何保证神说的爱人如己没又被删减过?神可能本意是只爱自己信主的弟兄,要消灭仇敌,和伊斯兰的教导相似。还有一夫多妻,乱伦,同性恋,怎么能保证这些全是犯罪?会不会神对罪的定义并不是大部分基督徒所认为的?如果以现在人的社会观念,大卫王可能要被驱逐出教会,一个杀人犯,而且偷奸的人在现在大部分的教会根本无法被接受去参见任何服侍,是不是我们对神要求我们对圣洁生活的定义也受时代的影响很主观?

  • @guokuiqiao7491
    @guokuiqiao74916 күн бұрын

    我真的很感恩庄老师的教导,那种无比的包容可以说改变了我对基督教各种神学,教派的主观偏执看法,让我更多的去爱,更少的去指责和我信仰有偏差的弟兄姐妹,但同时,也确实增加了很多困惑,比如对罪的定义,让我觉得很多我一直以为是正确的基督徒生活标准都不在那么确定。我和我妻子把初吻留到婚礼,婚前不会单独在一个房间,也不会单独出去约会,我一直以为婚前同居是不荣耀神的,甚至是犯罪,但现在很多罪好像都不一定是罪,比如未婚同居,比如同性恋,现在我真的挺困惑的

  • @user-bt2xw2gm1w
    @user-bt2xw2gm1w6 күн бұрын

    莊老師想請教一下為什麼孔望山壁畫會成為多馬到過中國的證據呢,因為我查孔望山壁畫似乎跟佛道教比較有關,在這一點上不是很懂😮

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY6 күн бұрын

    有一本法文書《多馬奠立中國教會》這本書提到對江蘇連雲港孔望山崖壁上的人物浮雕的研究,揭示了使徒多馬於公元65至68年來到中國宣教,並在中國奠立了中國教會這一事實,比佛教進入中國早了整整一個世紀,卻被後來傳入中國的佛教篡改了,後者也在孔望山崖壁上雕刻了大量的佛教浮雕,企圖掩蓋真相,並將聖母馬利亞抱著嬰孩的浮雕形象篡改為佛教觀世音的形象,欺騙了歷史歷代的華夏子孫,使他們不但偏離了真理,而且還誤以為佛教是本土信仰,基督教是外來的信仰。可以到網上搜索相關研究。

  • @user-mo2yo8qz3s
    @user-mo2yo8qz3s6 күн бұрын

    猶大福音是真是假!然而猶大是否真是為了三十塊錢出賣了主耶穌基督!真是無間道的最好詮釋!一切都要神本身解釋!而不是讓我們這些被造者來說好說歹的!正如猶太人為何如此抵擋主耶穌基督!🙏

  • @frankieyang7826
    @frankieyang78267 күн бұрын

    阿门 感谢主

  • @frankieyang7826
    @frankieyang78267 күн бұрын

    阿门 感恩分享

  • @mingchengwu6986
    @mingchengwu69867 күн бұрын

    謝謝莊老師耐心的講解,獲益良多!

  • @yumwo4413
    @yumwo44137 күн бұрын

    多謝莊老師精彩的分享

  • @jabez1020tw
    @jabez1020tw8 күн бұрын

    感謝莊弟兄費心的整理👍

  • @peter-chou
    @peter-chou8 күн бұрын

    阿門

  • @fengchenchan3583
    @fengchenchan35838 күн бұрын

    老師您好:我有一個疑問?巴蘭是否是神所揀選的先知,因他也貪愛錢財。

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY8 күн бұрын

    請看 CXCY〈誠心呈義〉巴蘭的故事 kzread.info/dash/bejne/q6yYuM6gXdCff5s.html

  • @user-bt2xw2gm1w
    @user-bt2xw2gm1w8 күн бұрын

    雖然已是七年前的影片,但仍然很有說服力的影片,感謝莊老師

  • @user-sj7qm9eq5u
    @user-sj7qm9eq5u9 күн бұрын

    这是有限无误(Limited Inerrancy)的观点吗?就是富勒神学院为代表的福音派的圣经观吧。

  • @user-ev8ms3ek9g
    @user-ev8ms3ek9g9 күн бұрын

    感謝莊老師仔細的分享

  • @PaulsLay-sc2bi
    @PaulsLay-sc2bi9 күн бұрын

    救世主耶稣救贖耶稣完成救贖前和後的所有罪人〔包括主求天父原諒那些不知道他/她們在做什麽的人〕和任何知錯願意悔改的都必能得到救贖之恩 在主神創造天地前都已看到一切善惡 完善的全套計劃都已安排好了 信徒都已知道自己所信的是全能的 神秘的 在帝王之上的主 不要用人的思维去想主的一切, 因為,主是唯一的造物主,除了主神之外,一切都是受主所造的受造物....

  • @mangmaga3559
    @mangmaga35599 күн бұрын

    耶穌的教導與佛教論述毫不相干。

  • @norcolee
    @norcolee10 күн бұрын

    莊老师,谢谢您的分享。是否请您讲诉诺亚洪水和大禹治洪水有没有关联?古代都提到洪水,显然有些关联。

  • @user-yp5or2yt4k
    @user-yp5or2yt4k10 күн бұрын

    The Gospel of Matthew of the New Testament documents Jesus’ genealogy. At the start, it says that Jesus was a descendant of Abraham and of David, and the son of Joseph; next it says that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, and born of a virgin-which would mean He was not the son of Joseph or the descendant of Abraham and of David. The genealogy, though, insists on associating Jesus with Joseph. Next, the genealogy begins to record the process by which Jesus was born. It says Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, that He was born of a virgin, and not the son of Joseph. Yet in the genealogy it is clearly written that Jesus was the son of Joseph, and because the genealogy is written for Jesus, it records forty-two generations. When it goes to the generation of Joseph, it hurriedly says that Joseph was the husband of Mary, words which are given in order to prove that Jesus was the descendant of Abraham. Is this not a contradiction? The genealogy clearly documents Joseph’s ancestry, it is obviously the genealogy of Joseph, but Matthew insists that it is the genealogy of Jesus. Does this not deny the fact of Jesus’ conception by the Holy Spirit? Thus, is the genealogy by Matthew not a human idea? It is ridiculous! This is how you can know that this book did not come entirely from the Holy Spirit. There are, perhaps, some people who think that God must have a genealogy on earth, as a result of which they assign Jesus as the forty-second generation of Abraham. That is really ridiculous! After arriving on earth, how could God have a genealogy? If you say that God has a genealogy, do you not rank Him among the creatures of God? For God is not of the earth, He is the Lord of creation, and although He is of flesh, He is not of the same substance as man. How could you rank God as being of the same kind as a creature of God? Abraham cannot represent God; he was the object of Jehovah’s work at the time, he was merely a faithful servant approved of by Jehovah, and he was one of the people of Israel. How could he be an ancestor of Jesus? Who wrote the genealogy of Jesus? Did Jesus Himself write it? Did Jesus personally say to them, “Write My genealogy”? It was recorded by Matthew after Jesus was nailed to the cross. At the time, Jesus had done much work that was incomprehensible to His disciples, and had not provided any explanation. After He left, the disciples began to preach and work everywhere, and for the sake of that stage of work, they began writing the epistles and the books of gospel. The books of gospel of the New Testament were recorded twenty to thirty years after Jesus was crucified. Before, the people of Israel only read the Old Testament. That is to say, at the beginning of the Age of Grace people read the Old Testament. The New Testament only appeared during the Age of Grace. The New Testament did not exist when Jesus worked; the people after He was resurrected and ascended to heaven recorded His work. Only then were there the Four Gospels, in addition to which were also the epistles of Paul and Peter, as well as the Book of Revelation. More than three hundred years after Jesus ascended to heaven, subsequent generations collated these documents selectively, and only then was there the New Testament of the Bible. Only after this work had been completed was there the New Testament; it did not exist previously. God had done all that work, and Paul and the other apostles had written so many epistles to the churches at various locations. People after them combined their epistles, and appended the greatest vision recorded by John on the island of Patmos, in which was prophesied God’s work of the last days. People made this sequence, which is different from the utterances of today. What is recorded today is according to the steps of God’s work; what people engage with today is the work personally done by God, and the words personally uttered by Him. You-mankind-do not need to interfere; the words, which come directly from the Spirit, have been arranged step by step, and are different from the arrangement of man’s records. What they recorded, it can be said, was according to their level of education and human caliber. What they recorded was the experiences of men, and each had their own means of recording and knowing, and each record was different. Thus, if you worship the Bible as God you are extremely ignorant and stupid! Why do you not seek the work of the God of today? Only the work of God can save man. The Bible cannot save man, people could read it for several thousand years and still there would not be the slightest change in them, and if you worship the Bible you will never gain the work of the Holy Spirit. -The Word, Vol. 1. The Appearance and Work of God. Concerning the Bible (3)

  • @poweiliao2973
    @poweiliao297310 күн бұрын

    感謝主,有您這樣願意說實話的人在,也感謝神讓你如此的有智慧,辛苦你了!要學習聖經,還翻閱希伯來的聖經為我們解答,如果沒有你的細心解讀,我們很難理解神的話語,感謝主,上帝祝福你

  • @phagechuang2493
    @phagechuang249310 күн бұрын

    除了感謝莊牧師,也敬佩您製作如此深度的教學,有幸活在今代,從網上向您受益。這集使我對神學認識的自由更加開闊。 但我的見解是,聖靈默示使徒寫下聖經,在墨水風乾的那刻,即是全然無誤的聖經。 對我來說,我不想當一個理盲。但我總是覺得「基督徒的信心需要更加完全」,即便我們都無以成全這地步,但是上帝是全能全知、完全的愛,祂的完全並不會賜下『有某一小小小部分缺漏錯謬』的啟示給我們。 雖是難解的問題,但都彰顯祂的偉大!

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY10 күн бұрын

    請收看下集節目「聖經中明顯矛盾經文的合集」

  • @phagechuang2493
    @phagechuang24939 күн бұрын

    @@CXCY 謝謝莊老師,能向您學習是一件很幸福的事情!願上帝親自賜福您手上的工作,榮神益人!

  • @user-bo4bb9se4d
    @user-bo4bb9se4d10 күн бұрын

    我们教会认为的顺序是:耶稣降生--牧羊人朝见--四十天后抱去圣殿--留在伯利恒受博士朝见--周岁逃往埃及--希律杀婴--希律死亡回拿撒勒。 每个主日我们教会都会按照这个时间线轮流记念。想请教一下,庄老师为什么不赞成这种叙述?

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY10 күн бұрын

    請收看下集節目「聖經中明顯矛盾經文的合集」

  • @CCCCUMC
    @CCCCUMC10 күн бұрын

    谢谢老师,我相信圣经有很少很少的抄写错误,但如您说所马太和路加为了自己的写作目的杜撰大段圣经的说法,是很危险的。尽管历史上也许没有相关的记载,这并不表示圣经记录有错误。对于马太和路加的记录,我接受的理解是这样的:耶稣降生的伯利恒,天使报大喜的信息,被牧羊人寻见,后受割礼,在耶路撒冷被献给神后回到伯利恒,博士来朝见耶稣(注意马太的记录:2:11 进了房子,看见小孩子和他母亲马利亚), 是在房子里,不是在马厩里面,这也许是希律根据博士的描述要杀害2岁以内小孩的原因,耶稣被带着逃往埃及,后返回拿撒勒。圣经都是神所默示的,我们不应该轻易的说无法考证的大段圣经是杜撰的,但是马太为了14代的分开,的确忽略的一些王的名字,是带有目的性的。

  • @user-wk8vi2ju6r
    @user-wk8vi2ju6r10 күн бұрын

    I agree with you. Many hiding facts were not written in the history books because of specific reasons due to personal or national purpose. God knows and control every thing happening in the world , we don't worry about.

  • @CXCY
    @CXCY10 күн бұрын

    請收看下集節目「聖經中明顯矛盾經文的合集」

  • @poweiliao2973
    @poweiliao297311 күн бұрын

    感謝主❤