But at which moment did the sequence of events reverse for the guys in the spaceship? They saw the boom, and then the missile in reverse. But did the missile reverse away from an exploded planet? Are they seeing the broken planet and the missile backing away from it? Also, it occurred to me one night I was watching star trek that the warp factor they travel at has to correlate to the distance they have to travel. The maximum possible warp speed would be whichever speed allowed them to arrive at the very moment they departed. Go any faster and they would arrive before they left. Say they were going from earth to vulcan. If they traveled faster than light they would arrive at vulcan, but vulcan would not be there. They would have to adjust their spatial heading to vulcan's position in space at the time of their set arrival. Those coordinates would be off the grid. But how do we know that things like this do not happen? Is this causality an attribute of the universe, or our perception of it? On large enough scales, according to our understanding, space expands faster than the speed of light, which means that light emmitted from one location will never reach any location far enough away that the distance increases faster than the light can traverse it. But negative energy is theoretically real. So there is a possibility that it might exist somewhere, and that it might have effects that might alter space to allow light to traverse it faster. If so, would we have any way of detecting it? Could it be that some distant objects we can observe are in reality the same objects at different times? Seems to me its theoretically possible, in which case the requirement of causality having to be preserved is a requirement of our perception, not what we perceive.
@internetprinting431436 минут бұрын
wrong
@paulpapathanasiou2965Сағат бұрын
The speed is relative. So who is ageing slower when both are moving relative to each other? That doesn't make any sense. There must be something else making clocks to go out of sync and has nothing to do with the speed.
@Logical.Mania963 сағат бұрын
Is it because they act as waves and particles at the same time? The wave has movement that cannot be measured as a particle and the wave could have a reversed amplitude for negative spin.
@threynolds24 сағат бұрын
Wouldn't it be simpler if the speed of light is not constant? How did Einstein figure that out, anyway?
@llhiejen5 сағат бұрын
Hi Sir sorry I am a slow learner.. i am just curious on your last presentation about the people on the Circle spacestation I know this video is about Age and Age is measured by time. My question is If you take Time out of the equation does it mean that the Body Cells of the furthest Person on the spacestaion Changes rapidly compare to the Person on the Center of the spacestation? This is the 1st time I saw your Channel and I like it
@pakparou6 сағат бұрын
She..she..she..her..her..her..we want to see pure science not eurovision, what will come next; it; you chose the astronaut to be a woman for a purpose not related to the content of the video , please..dont become like the others, you seem a good teacher.
@sairindhreesaha71532 сағат бұрын
Dude, go take a shower, have a good meal and then go to sleep. Maybe that will help you see how nuts you sound.
@narfwhals7843Сағат бұрын
He he he. What's next? Choose the astronaut to be a man for a purpose not related to the video content? Ridiculous.
Why do travel faster then light effect understanding? The light is the first step of how chemistry in physical science will adjust itself to Space Galaxy adjustments at the start of the day. If it is traveling faster than light, is the reference of what is happening is not participated with, so anything goes from different angles of views/references.
@rayjasmantas96096 сағат бұрын
If feeling smarter, then explain how the Sun with its size is not instantly spotted to where it is: Help, light is generated, thus could be made to travel at different speeds, one the match Erath's life, another to see the Sun where it is.
@rayjasmantas96096 сағат бұрын
Did Davinci warn against Star Wars?
@rayjasmantas96096 сағат бұрын
So which light speed gives better focus?
@rayjasmantas96095 сағат бұрын
The master skill level question: Why does light travel at the speed of the Solar System'/Galaxy "adjustment of displacement" in empty Space? {A locking mechanism exists!} {On the Atom level, the the reference where light is found!}
@rayjasmantas96095 сағат бұрын
And there is the logic of after light is absorbed, it is change to electricity type of light response, -- or the eye absorption transforming the eel to a electrical eel!
@bentationfunkiloglio6 сағат бұрын
“No más”, Robert Duran, Nov 25th 1980. So simple, even a heavy weight boxer understands it!
@odal67706 сағат бұрын
I had come, a couple years ago, to the conclusion that Gauss's Law was an unnecessary complication that only served to get rid of Maxwell's and Coulomb's "ether" and replace it by the more metaphysically acceptable "(magnetic) field". I was, and still am, convinced that Coulomb's Law is more than sufficient. This is a point where metaphysical considerations are presented in a scientifically acceptable disguise. My forum/blog is not indexed by Google and I am not allowed to put a link to it. My whole reaction would be deleted.
@user-dialectic-scietist18 сағат бұрын
Actually in your explanation you indedifing momentum with preasure and this isn't correct because preasure we invented for diferent explanation.
@user-dialectic-scietist18 сағат бұрын
No, momentum, isn't the mv. This is only one math equation for measuring its value. The physical meaning of momentum is the αbility of something material, to be able to tranfer energy and to give it on something else in an interaction. Light can do that and for that reason has momentum.
@saratht82238 сағат бұрын
@Mahesh_Shenoy, makes sense More Proteins More Mass
@williamwalker399 сағат бұрын
The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *KZread presentation of above arguments: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pZmExqxwpra3prQ.html <kzread.info/dash/bejne/pZmExqxwpra3prQ.html> *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
@veervishalmishra452610 сағат бұрын
Excellent
@shauryagupta750610 сағат бұрын
Hey there! Really loved your ten minute amazing videos.. My teacher told me that the direction of angular momentum,angular velocity ,etc...is perpendicular to the plane....i ask why?they say that its just a convention which makes our calculations get converted to kind of a straight line motion....i was satisfied....but now on seeing the working of a gyroscope i am confused....how can the direction being perpendicular to the plane(which till now was just a convention) have a physical significance...it makes no sense to me that angular momentum has a direction perpendicular to the plane and bcoz of that gyroscopes work. I know that u can definitely clear my confusion 🫡🫡
@veervishalmishra452610 сағат бұрын
How does space know?
@veervishalmishra452610 сағат бұрын
Do virtual particles in space effect?
@superbaddctv11 сағат бұрын
Lmao he definitely hit the spot when he put dragonball evolution in there 🤣
@superbaddctv11 сағат бұрын
I thought the reason there are no events happening from outside the black hole was because at a certain point the photons we see coming from the object entering were overpowered at a specific distance from the singularity
@sree13791811 сағат бұрын
Damn! Subscribed to you! I am 13, and let me tell you, no one , NO ONE ,has ever answered these questions I had in school. I am following your channel since last year and oh boy! Yours is very cool! I am also an indian by the way.
@hondacivc9312 сағат бұрын
Wouldn't we actually be measuring the amount of data transfered by a magnitude of stronger and weaker amounts of light as the "light clock" ticks? Data being usable relative frames between ticks? It's not ticking slower, it's transferring a lower magnitude
@Scamparelli12 сағат бұрын
Wow, in my 40's and that explained it better than anything I've ever seen. Thank you for describing how we got to this position of understanding in a way a 'normal' person can understand!
@timwu632413 сағат бұрын
I'm not understanding why the clock in the plane is slower than one on the earth. Look, from the planes reference frame, it's the earth that is moving and therefore having a slower time. So the plane should have faster clock? I know this process is not inertia frame, and involves general relativity which tells us the surface of the earth is having higher spacetime curvature. But what about if we only talk about special relativity? Time dialation is relative only right? Any two moving objects, they both will see the other party having a slower time? So if one of the twins fly away and come back, who really gets older? Or are they still the same age? Please explain. Thanks!
@kaleijuka853213 сағат бұрын
All inertia reference frame observers are equally valid*
@mohsenbahremand287713 сағат бұрын
Dude that hair doesn't make u look like Einstein Shave it right away
@nextinstead13 сағат бұрын
Does any one have this in english
@doctorzeuss578914 сағат бұрын
Wouldn't it be simpler to conclude that if you are moving away an event then that is just another part of the equation that needs to be added? Not that the effect actually happened before the cause?
@dijik12315 сағат бұрын
Ask jojo
@calvinwelder831015 сағат бұрын
So basically mars time will be slower than earth time
@ronstiles268116 сағат бұрын
I'm not saying flat earth is real, but I just don't agree with space time , it's like saying because of size makes a difference in time, that would mean our sun is In a different time than the earth, and the atomic clocks experiment, is forgetting something, they operate using electricity, witch is a electromagnetic wave, light is a electromagnetic wave, that travels at x speed in a. Vaccum, if we add gravity speed changes,
Пікірлер
But at which moment did the sequence of events reverse for the guys in the spaceship? They saw the boom, and then the missile in reverse. But did the missile reverse away from an exploded planet? Are they seeing the broken planet and the missile backing away from it? Also, it occurred to me one night I was watching star trek that the warp factor they travel at has to correlate to the distance they have to travel. The maximum possible warp speed would be whichever speed allowed them to arrive at the very moment they departed. Go any faster and they would arrive before they left. Say they were going from earth to vulcan. If they traveled faster than light they would arrive at vulcan, but vulcan would not be there. They would have to adjust their spatial heading to vulcan's position in space at the time of their set arrival. Those coordinates would be off the grid. But how do we know that things like this do not happen? Is this causality an attribute of the universe, or our perception of it? On large enough scales, according to our understanding, space expands faster than the speed of light, which means that light emmitted from one location will never reach any location far enough away that the distance increases faster than the light can traverse it. But negative energy is theoretically real. So there is a possibility that it might exist somewhere, and that it might have effects that might alter space to allow light to traverse it faster. If so, would we have any way of detecting it? Could it be that some distant objects we can observe are in reality the same objects at different times? Seems to me its theoretically possible, in which case the requirement of causality having to be preserved is a requirement of our perception, not what we perceive.
wrong
The speed is relative. So who is ageing slower when both are moving relative to each other? That doesn't make any sense. There must be something else making clocks to go out of sync and has nothing to do with the speed.
Is it because they act as waves and particles at the same time? The wave has movement that cannot be measured as a particle and the wave could have a reversed amplitude for negative spin.
Wouldn't it be simpler if the speed of light is not constant? How did Einstein figure that out, anyway?
Hi Sir sorry I am a slow learner.. i am just curious on your last presentation about the people on the Circle spacestation I know this video is about Age and Age is measured by time. My question is If you take Time out of the equation does it mean that the Body Cells of the furthest Person on the spacestaion Changes rapidly compare to the Person on the Center of the spacestation? This is the 1st time I saw your Channel and I like it
She..she..she..her..her..her..we want to see pure science not eurovision, what will come next; it; you chose the astronaut to be a woman for a purpose not related to the content of the video , please..dont become like the others, you seem a good teacher.
Dude, go take a shower, have a good meal and then go to sleep. Maybe that will help you see how nuts you sound.
He he he. What's next? Choose the astronaut to be a man for a purpose not related to the video content? Ridiculous.
-None to@@narfwhals7843: -Narfwhals7843 : blah blah blah blah..ridiculous
Why do travel faster then light effect understanding? The light is the first step of how chemistry in physical science will adjust itself to Space Galaxy adjustments at the start of the day. If it is traveling faster than light, is the reference of what is happening is not participated with, so anything goes from different angles of views/references.
If feeling smarter, then explain how the Sun with its size is not instantly spotted to where it is: Help, light is generated, thus could be made to travel at different speeds, one the match Erath's life, another to see the Sun where it is.
Did Davinci warn against Star Wars?
So which light speed gives better focus?
The master skill level question: Why does light travel at the speed of the Solar System'/Galaxy "adjustment of displacement" in empty Space? {A locking mechanism exists!} {On the Atom level, the the reference where light is found!}
And there is the logic of after light is absorbed, it is change to electricity type of light response, -- or the eye absorption transforming the eel to a electrical eel!
“No más”, Robert Duran, Nov 25th 1980. So simple, even a heavy weight boxer understands it!
I had come, a couple years ago, to the conclusion that Gauss's Law was an unnecessary complication that only served to get rid of Maxwell's and Coulomb's "ether" and replace it by the more metaphysically acceptable "(magnetic) field". I was, and still am, convinced that Coulomb's Law is more than sufficient. This is a point where metaphysical considerations are presented in a scientifically acceptable disguise. My forum/blog is not indexed by Google and I am not allowed to put a link to it. My whole reaction would be deleted.
Actually in your explanation you indedifing momentum with preasure and this isn't correct because preasure we invented for diferent explanation.
No, momentum, isn't the mv. This is only one math equation for measuring its value. The physical meaning of momentum is the αbility of something material, to be able to tranfer energy and to give it on something else in an interaction. Light can do that and for that reason has momentum.
@Mahesh_Shenoy, makes sense More Proteins More Mass
The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *KZread presentation of above arguments: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pZmExqxwpra3prQ.html <kzread.info/dash/bejne/pZmExqxwpra3prQ.html> *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997
Excellent
Hey there! Really loved your ten minute amazing videos.. My teacher told me that the direction of angular momentum,angular velocity ,etc...is perpendicular to the plane....i ask why?they say that its just a convention which makes our calculations get converted to kind of a straight line motion....i was satisfied....but now on seeing the working of a gyroscope i am confused....how can the direction being perpendicular to the plane(which till now was just a convention) have a physical significance...it makes no sense to me that angular momentum has a direction perpendicular to the plane and bcoz of that gyroscopes work. I know that u can definitely clear my confusion 🫡🫡
How does space know?
Do virtual particles in space effect?
Lmao he definitely hit the spot when he put dragonball evolution in there 🤣
I thought the reason there are no events happening from outside the black hole was because at a certain point the photons we see coming from the object entering were overpowered at a specific distance from the singularity
Damn! Subscribed to you! I am 13, and let me tell you, no one , NO ONE ,has ever answered these questions I had in school. I am following your channel since last year and oh boy! Yours is very cool! I am also an indian by the way.
Wouldn't we actually be measuring the amount of data transfered by a magnitude of stronger and weaker amounts of light as the "light clock" ticks? Data being usable relative frames between ticks? It's not ticking slower, it's transferring a lower magnitude
Wow, in my 40's and that explained it better than anything I've ever seen. Thank you for describing how we got to this position of understanding in a way a 'normal' person can understand!
I'm not understanding why the clock in the plane is slower than one on the earth. Look, from the planes reference frame, it's the earth that is moving and therefore having a slower time. So the plane should have faster clock? I know this process is not inertia frame, and involves general relativity which tells us the surface of the earth is having higher spacetime curvature. But what about if we only talk about special relativity? Time dialation is relative only right? Any two moving objects, they both will see the other party having a slower time? So if one of the twins fly away and come back, who really gets older? Or are they still the same age? Please explain. Thanks!
All inertia reference frame observers are equally valid*
Dude that hair doesn't make u look like Einstein Shave it right away
Does any one have this in english
Wouldn't it be simpler to conclude that if you are moving away an event then that is just another part of the equation that needs to be added? Not that the effect actually happened before the cause?
Ask jojo
So basically mars time will be slower than earth time
I'm not saying flat earth is real, but I just don't agree with space time , it's like saying because of size makes a difference in time, that would mean our sun is In a different time than the earth, and the atomic clocks experiment, is forgetting something, they operate using electricity, witch is a electromagnetic wave, light is a electromagnetic wave, that travels at x speed in a. Vaccum, if we add gravity speed changes,
The Indian MKBHD
Truly wonderful videos! Thank you