Пікірлер

• 
  @shoppapa72384 сағат бұрын

  If i was using a fin capture svt 40 i wouldn't be upset. 🎉 Plus the fins had enough small arms to make a faction in the game

• 
  @TF2Scoutfan2020 сағат бұрын

  I think having a Pacific Theater war front would be nice, saying as most of the maps are huge, so you could do entire islands as the map, or a large chuck of it anyway.

• 
  @JamboudaКүн бұрын

  FINLANDIA SUOMI PERKELE!! 🇫🇮🇫🇮👱🏻👱🏻👱🏻🍻🍻🍻

• 
  @Ch33kclappaКүн бұрын

  Aside from new factions, I would also like to see map-specific uniforms and loadouts. They’ve done this but it’s been so inconsistent. You see it with El Alamein. The units/loadouts are true to the time period. Yet you don’t see it with every single other one. It would be nice to see 29th ID and 2nd Rangers on Omaha, 101st Airborne and Fallschirmjägers on Carentan, etc. And don’t get me started on the new DLC they just put out. Shit makes me wanna puke.

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_Күн бұрын

  @@Ch33kclappa I was about to say….😂

• 
  @ShockTroop93Күн бұрын

  Mg42 and mg34 are 3 hit kill. In the past they were 2hk. British update changed this

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_Күн бұрын

  Noted

• 
  @RamboArminius1Күн бұрын

  Yes it would

• 
  @isaacfoster-do7rl2 күн бұрын

  good idear

• 
  @andrewstich46142 күн бұрын

  What if instead of tanks, the finish faction got dedicated AT gun squads, with a squad lead, a gunner, and a loader. Squad lead builds the different guns, gunner guns, loaded loads, and they have to work together to surround and destroy Soviet tanks. More cooperative AT tactics than run at tank and explode.

• 
  @iamgamernoob41212 күн бұрын

  I think the faction that could be added that makes sense would be the Finnish; during the continuation war. 1. They had there small arms are basically what Soviets and the Germans had. Mosin nagant for their main rifle, the Sumi varients and Mp40 for ther automatic and the Ls-26 and Sampo L41 for bi-poded weapon. For anti-tank the Lahti M39 rifle and if Team 17 is willing to add the pazerfaust. 2. Armor support they didn't have much so that could be a problem. For light tank you could the Finnish made B2-assault gun, for medium if Team-17 has the capability to do the none turret ring Stugg III , which was lend lease by th e germans, for the heavy tank I guess do whatever the Finnish stole from the soviets(Idr) and for recon I guess the Landsverk Anti-II. Maybe switch the B-42 with the Landsverk with each other. 3. Uniforms you could use the German helmets ww2 and ww1 helmets and whatever there hat was, and for Uniforms the winter and their coat, which all these should be similar enough to what Germany has. 4. Maps we could do the Manerheim line, around murmansk and Karlia So in theory this faction would the most cost effective one to make since over half the assets are reskins and slight remodels. Except for the maps

• 
  @Bellee7022 күн бұрын

  ITALY! WHY THE HELL HAS NOBODY SAID ITALY! BATTLE OF SIDI BARANNI! THEY’D BE ON PAR WITH THE UK! RAHHHH

• 
  @chrisjones23123 күн бұрын

  No one gonna mention Monte Cassino?

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_3 күн бұрын

  @@chrisjones2312 I have seen that/heard that, I’d be fine with it. I know it was more of a US operation with help from basically the entirety of the Allies and could work for the UK or US

• 
  @bruhism1733 күн бұрын

  The dev team are being paid by the Rothchilds to ruin the game

• 
  @sss1111ify3 күн бұрын

  An Eastern Front map featuring the Siege of Sevastopol or Leningrad would be cool.

• 
  @pocketchange18714 күн бұрын

  German main need new German maps we kicked your bucks operation overlord to operations Barbarossas

• 
  @pocketchange18714 күн бұрын

  No

• 
  @piotrmontgomerytv77864 күн бұрын

  Hell Let Loose basically relleased El Alamein and Driel(good maps) and then the game stalled completely it stands in place for a year now. It is a good game but not gonna lie there is a massive lack of updates.

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_4 күн бұрын

  The one thing I’ll say is that I think last years roadmap scared them. They are trying to figure out what they can deliver on. In terms of the roadmap, they have done a lot better in actuality putting out what they said they would. At least compared to last year. Not saying they have done a perfect job, plenty of issues but not entirely bad either like people make it out to be

• 
  @dinosaure_jr45954 күн бұрын

  Play Squad 44 and shut up. It features everything you want is stable, better playerbase that actually talks nearly always etc. And has more content

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_4 күн бұрын

  That’s ok, I’ll play a game that actually can play on console and PC that isn’t actually dead. But thanks for the “kind” input. Such a great way to try and get people to play that game 🙂

• 
  @dinosaure_jr45954 күн бұрын

  @@ChaoticHammer_ That hate was not intended for you but greedy team17. They destroyed my favorite game. Now I found a better one that features everything you call for. And the Argument "playable on Pc and Console only counts if you are a console player since theres no crossplay. Or at least ther wasnt as i still cared. And its very shitty on console too

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_3 күн бұрын

  @dinosaure_jr4595 I wish that had been stated. The comment without mentioning T17 makes it look like it’s on going to us and not that, just saying. I am console player and yes there isn’t PC and Console crossplay with each other (which I’m glad because then console is screwed lol) playing with a clan makes games a lot more bearable (clan matches bring out the best of HLL imo) and it’s not every time that I go by myself is it crap. Yes there are bad games in HLL, but that’s every game if we are being honest. Has t17 been perfect? hell no, the running speed debacle, update 14 trailer, and the issues with update 15.1, (the main big ticket items) but Black matter wasn’t super great either, they had a good game but couldn’t maintain their content well and communicate that to the players. No UK faction even though mentioning it in roadmaps, and just failing to overall deliver, T17 delivered and eventually got it right with the UK and are the verge of being console server browsers, something never thought of with black matter. The game has been functional in most aspects and besides occasional hiccups, it’s been pretty smooth on my end, but I know everyone’s experience is different. In the end, i want both games to succeed for competition sake, but at the same time, I’ll stay where I’m at with HLL, if Squad 44 works for you better, cool! Best of luck to ya. That’s just my take on the matter.

• 
  @shychi904 күн бұрын

  I’m super new to the game, like just hit lvl 40. Straight up in loved with it nd had this much fun in a min💯. Ngl I would be down for new maps, but i don’t like the idea of restricting or removing certain actions bc of said map😵‍💫. Adding in something unfair elements like that would give players a reason to think more.. but since im new I don’t really know yet😅🤝🏾

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_4 күн бұрын

  Understandable, it’s kind of why I put this video up, give your opinion, just as much as I have mine lol. I’m curious about what everyone has to say, so thank you!

• 
  @slugshell29014 күн бұрын

  Pacific would save them

• 
  @Kingdom_Of_Dassogne4 күн бұрын

  When most people think of Poland in WW2, they think of the 1939 invasion. What about uprisings? Imagine a Warsaw 44 Uprising map, where Polish forces have to scrounge for German, Polish, and Russian weapons around the map, while German forces patrol the city. Could be an interesting game mode. Maybe the Poles have to capture objectives in the city, or even just try to survive the German forces.

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_4 күн бұрын

  It would be an interesting game mode, many different ways you could do that could work

• 
  @marcdonkervoort19804 күн бұрын

  New content?? Fix the f*** game first

• 
  @naiopiaio71254 күн бұрын

  When you think about how you can make two factions balanced all the focus goes to weapons and vehicles, but it's often overlooked things such as commander abilities or simply the way the faction functions in general. I believe that in a pacific front scenario where you have americans with automatic and semiautomatic guns against japanese soldiers with bolt actions and bayonets, a good idea would be to make the japanese faction work completely differently. Japanese soldiers should have a lowered spawn time so that it compensates the kill/death ratio caused by their lack of superior weaponry against the marines. Japanese outposts and garrisons should be tunnel exits (like those from Rising Storm 2) that not only are hard to see, but emit little to no sound at all. Soldiers from the japanese faction should be allowed to perform banzai charges (Either the banzai scream should cause american soldier's view to be blurry to encourage people on the japanese side to perform those charges, or make being killed by a banzai charge cost 3x of manpower to your team). And last but not least, these underdog factions should have unique commander abilities that fit with their unique playstyle. It's true that it's also important, from a game developing point of view, that these playstyles should not be boring to the players, which may happen when you see that dying might be way too common on the Japanese faction.

• 
  @shamansshermans4 күн бұрын

  no

• 
  @gerardolara25644 күн бұрын

  Falta una facción canadiense

• 
  @neegoperez-lo5hw4 күн бұрын

  bruh they want even more players?, get some new servers thei're at the top of them capacity

• 
  @williammiller87435 күн бұрын

  Give the Finns Molotov cocktails and snow skees. This would be both historically accurate, would give the finns an interesting AT weapon which could be given to all and would give them greater mobility compared to the Soviets greater fire power.

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_5 күн бұрын

  @@williammiller8743 the Molotovs would have to be changed to damage vehicles since I don’t believe they do right now, but I’m all for it, now a snow ski mechanic…that would be interesting to see

• 
  @MaximusCaseyeus5 күн бұрын

  I don’t want to see the Finn’s until later, as almost all of their stuff was captured/bought. This means it will be a reskin and this is boring and lame. Japan and Italy would be better. After big original factions, smaller niche factions like Australia, India, Canada, Romania, Hungary and Finland later on when there are more maps to the bigger factions.

• 
  @selametas-salafi37265 күн бұрын

  Killed a tiger with a recon tank, on Alamein, we snuck up behind it under its nose while it was on top of a hill. Took like 6 shots straight to the rear at 15 meters away, but we killed it

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_5 күн бұрын

  @@selametas-salafi3726 best feeling in game, i will die on that hill lol

• 
  @nobodyimportant16005 күн бұрын

  Bro... Polish would be the best idea IMO. Because then you could have Polish vs USSR or Germany A not always Allies vs Germany, it is boring. Having some other faction to play against "allies" would be nice. Idk if pacific would be great idea anyway. Like playing on mortain is hell, cant imagine fighting in some "jungle" that they would put in there. Anyway, Polish or French for me it is.

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_5 күн бұрын

  @@nobodyimportant1600 the problem is Poland just can’t stand up to either faction, (Germany or USSR) at least in the tank department, which is what dominated the Polish theatre of war in 1939. I’d have to do more research on this, but I just don’t see a Poland vs Germany or Poland vs USSR being balanced unless it’s Infantry only, and that changes the game a lot. Even then I’d have to see if it would be balanced with that. (Probably could be but just unsure) That’s just my take on the subject. If it can be done right, I’m for it

• 
  @nobodyimportant16004 күн бұрын

  @@ChaoticHammer_ I believe if somebody wanted, they could balance it out somehow. For example, improve other parts of a Polish faction that would help compensate for the lack of tanks. For example cheaper cost of spawning a tank, more antitank ammo, mines for AT, the engineer, or maybe some mine or smth for other roles even though Allies and Ger don't have that. So maybe they would have less tanks, but more personel with antitank weaponry and other items. That would complicate things for heavy and slow Tiger/Panther or IS-2 quite a lot I think. Yes, might not be super realistic, but I doubt it would be such a problem if it would be able to solve the imbalance between the factions. It would allow us to have one faction that will be able to fight Germany and USSR as well. Sorry for my bad english, not my native language.

• 
  @nobodyimportant16004 күн бұрын

  For the sake of the game I don't see it as something that would take so much of the realism out of it, if I could get to fight a match without the German faction

• 
  @moonshinemike54105 күн бұрын

  All they need to do is add the Japanese. They could easily do Japan vs Russia and Japan vs USA. They would be able to finally give the Germans a break. I know I’m tired of playing as them

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_5 күн бұрын

  @@moonshinemike5410I’m not sure how they would do a Japan vs USSR, at least the 1945 battles, Russia dominated those battles, the border skirmishes could be battles. US vs Japan or the allies vs Japan, I kind of outlined my ideal battles that could be good in my opinion

• 
  @KidDynamite20165 күн бұрын

  Just vault older maps and put them on rotation

• 
  @casino_bandit14905 күн бұрын

  look, you can't advocate for balanced factions and maps while also advocating for historical accuracy. its not possible in regards to WW2 and the eastern europe, pacific theaters. Historically, different doctrines and inferior equipment are what made these factions successful or unsuccessful in the first place. What made the Japanese, as an example, so resilient is because of theire defenses and outdated look on warfare, when compared to Western ideas. But in the game, much like the Soviets, they'd be miserable to play as. Is what it is. Can't have everything.

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_5 күн бұрын

  @@casino_bandit1490 the game itself has a balance of historical accuracy and balance in game as is right now…so why can’t we ask for both? is it perfect? No, but it’s good enough I would say. I talked about two scenarios regarding Japan and the allies as a whole that could work that could play to both things asked for. There some factions that you could balance both historical accuracy and actual gameplay balance (namely Japan and maybe Finland) others are a lot harder though (Italy and France)

• 
  @G41wal5 күн бұрын

  PACIFIC THEATER ! I remember it was on their original Kickstarter road map. If they want to compete with S44 then I think a pacific theater expansion would be the best option

• 
  @jimmy123476545 күн бұрын

  Aussies vs Japs in the jungle similiar level of weaponry for the most part

• 
  @mr.bruh69355 күн бұрын

  squad 44 Driel is SO MUCH better than HLL Driel also we need Arnhem

• 
  @charliebrown46975 күн бұрын

  Squad 44 is going to be a flop.

• 
  @Gewalt19845 күн бұрын

  I think Hell Let Loose should add every possible front from world war two Make it different than every world war two shooter. They should also add uprising factions

• 
  @alexvisser59135 күн бұрын

  Dunno im just sick of most normandy maps. The british maps suck ass. The Russian maps are nice but charkov and kursk are very similar. Id love something more bold like a bew faction though

• 
  @iVETAnsolini6 күн бұрын

  We need more maps related to the Stalingrad front. So many moving battles took place there. They could even copy the campaign style that Rising Storm series has

• 
  @turbofox236 күн бұрын

  There's little sense in adding more content if they aren't going to fix the bugs and optimize the game with these updates.

• 
  @dja16476 күн бұрын

  Just play battlefield this game looks like battlefield

• 
  @93tallman16 күн бұрын

  Great video I’m new to he’ll let loose so I’m trying to get the hang on logistics of the game awesome info thank you.

• 
  @clarksmith4946 күн бұрын

  I want a japanese factoon, and then campaign modes.

• 
  @eeeewidner6 күн бұрын

  New fronts would be very nice. Getting new ones developed from a programing team other than Team 17 would be even better.

• 
  @MrCYCLINGD6 күн бұрын

  Are their enough people playing hll to justify the introduction of a whole new map and faction? It seems like T17 are just doing their very least and anticipating the games gradual demise.

• 
  @ChaoticHammer_6 күн бұрын

  I think if squad 44 wishes to try with way less of an active fan base than HLL…way not? Especially since people have been begging for it

• 
  @GenuineHeather6 күн бұрын

  One of my favorite WWII movies is A Bridge Too Far, based upon the book of the same name. Highly recommended if you haven't seen it. I always enjoy playing Driel because of this.

• 
  @luhxifyy6 күн бұрын

  would love new maps, but i would also love for them to fix the bugs first.

• 
  @tacticaloil61966 күн бұрын

  I'm still waiting for Poland that they announced along side Finland and just completely forgot about.No one wants to see night maps added because no one asked for them.Everyone wants a new factions/maps because WW2 was more than just USA VS Germany in France.Media focus too much on France.Yes it is historically important and interesting but when it comes to entertainment in the form of games and movies then the western front in France is overused.What about Belgium,Poland,Italy,Japan,Finland and all the other countries that had big or small roles?Obviously as a Pole I want to see Poland the most but from a entertainment/buisness pov its a no brainer.We Poles love our FPS (so the player base would go up as no WW2 FPS really has Poland or our weaponry/uniforms) and adding Poland allows for unique weapons, Urban warfare (That is not France) and allows Team 17 to add Poland from 1939 and the Uprising of 1944.The battle of Berlin would also be a great start (as u mentioned) as it wouldn't change any features but would add a new map (especialy for the soviets that I rarely see being played) that players care about and again would introduce more Urban warfare that a lot of FPS are missing out on.