Mustard explores curious and often little known topics and strives to make them entertaining by focusing on beautiful presentations, engaging narratives...and maybe a little humor too. We produce new videos regularly so please subscribe!
mustardchannel.com
Пікірлер
1933
Hello
I love the hydraulic shock absorber, what a funny 20th century solution
It didn't work because the seas are not like glass all the time however land is
Sick from exposure to lead soder. But, don't worry, we deliberately sunk it off the coast of norway. No more problems...see?
L
I’ve always been interested how do you get these cool animations ? So you make them yourself of get them from somewhere ?
Answer: *POP*
This is definition of “how bout we go with everything?”
I'd watch a movie about this, starring Tom Hanks, sure.
It's a well known fact that Russian technology is far inferior to US or western. They are just willing to throw large numbers of men and machines into the fight with no concern for casualties. quantity has a quality all it's own. They possess nuclear weapons. Even if only 50% function....
< mechanical simplicity
I came here looking for captain Nemo, sadly let down
Israel put the F15 into its fire baptism
Navalation
A great idea and a beautiful craft, but tied down by an incompetent commander and technological setbacks. The craft never seemed to work correctly, which is a shame. The aesthetics are top notch. Id love to undergo an expedition such as this, it makes my adventurous heart flutter.
8:20 I don't know much Morse code, but I know that one 😬 very nice touch!
And till this day Airbus cabin doors stay firmly on board of the plane
Politics.
Great video! One thing that doesn't match: the shown map isnt't correct for the time period ;)
Aerodynamics don't change. Technology changes weapons, electronics and engines. This is why the defense industry redefined fighters by generations. They want to sell new products, with more lucrative contracts. Hard to do if new technologies are incorporated into existing airframes. Calling F-14, F-15, F-16, F-18, and F-20 fighters 4th generation fighters. Is all about a new and far more costly contract. The YF-23 was the most effective stealth fighter. Stand off, engage targets, then bug out. Staying away from a dogfight. Stealty and hard to hurt. So the USAF went with the F-22. Basically a stealthy version of the F-15. Able to dogfight. Except that being out of production, means that the F-22 has no future. Once the current airframes are worn out? The F-22 however good it actually is? Will be gone. A few good stealth aircraft are essential. ELINT, SAM suppression, C3I strikes. A few stealth hunters. Call them fighters if you like. Hunting AWACS, aerial tankers, and squadron commanders, as well as wild weasel assets. Not all aircraft can be stealthily. It's too expensive to reengineer a whole new generation of aircraft. Unless aerodynamics have been substantially effected by technical advances. It's possible to build aircraft that maneuver more violently. Only a living body cannot take the extreme G-forces. Currently available aircraft are proven and effective. Needing only advanced technologies incorporated to remain relevant. Iran proudly displayed why drones are not a good answer. When they unveiled a top secret stealth drone, belonging to the Pentagon. Taken over and landed intact in Iran. Electronic warfare is no joke, and flying robots are vulnerable. AI Murder robots flying around are another pit of perfidious problems. Rife for every kind of exploitation, and abuse. Currently available airframes have the advantages of having already been engineered as well as the variety of unexpected issues sorted out. Even if they are currently out of production. This saves a great deal of time and money. The F-15, F,-16, and F-18 currently in production can stay in production with upgrades. Given the cost of operating the F-35. The retirement of the F-14 Tomcat, is quite ironic. The cold war seemed over. Aircraft carriers didn't need a high performance interceptor to drop bombs on terrorists living in caves. F-18 Fighters cost less to operate than F-14 fighters. Washington D.C. was quite annoyed that Iran, managed to keep thier F-14 fighters flying. Inspite of the determination to deny them parts, or any kind of technical support. So more than a billion dollars worth, of some of world's best fighters were scrapped! So Iran couldn't get any more parts. Iran continues to operate their F-14 fighters. What a waste! The F-18, and F-20 have a common ancestor. The F-5 Freedom fighter. The YF-17 was an enlarged version of the F-5 design. Larger nose with more room for electronics, much more powerful engines, a twin tail and leading edge extensions for improved high angle of attack performance. After losing to the YF-16 the YF-17 design was changed to the F/A-18 for the Navy. The F-20, had been conceived as the F-5G. The small twin engines replaced by a single, but far more powerful engine. Also a redesigned wing. Resulting in a fighter so good. The USAF redesignated it the F-20. Smaller and cheaper than the F-16. General Dynamics viewed the F-20 as a serious threat to F-16 sales. Using every political connection to ensure that the F-20 would never go into production. Just so, small effective, hard to see, and extremely dangerous to fly against. The F-20 would have made a great force multiplier. Modernized with new electronics, engines and weapons. This fighter could easily be not just a force multiplier, but a real nasty surprise to a hostile airforce. The genius behind the F-15 and it's companion fighters. Seems to have deserted the DOD today. If there is a successor to the F-22, no one seems to have seen one. Perhaps it, and it's photographs are classified. Perhaps no real affordable successful development has been produced.
mile F^0 feet 🗿 km celsius ✅
A collapsible aluminum rod could've solved the bending wing problem. With today's advanced material's, inflatable planes could be a viable option for budget flight hobbyists.
The waves swept it away did they not go underwater where the seas are calm they rode the whole time on the surface stupid
If they would have done it right now today they would have got 4.5 million dollars
Imagine having breakfast in London, fly to New York and Eat lunch then be back in London for Dinner.
Why don't we go there now days...all technology is improved now days
He ran into the greatest danger of them all, Ego!
8:44 Smart move.
the fuck you mean what happened? the B-21 just came out..
10:56 my guy you cannot write a sentence that begins "without exception everyone..." and then conclude that sentence "...everyone except Wilkins."
Interesting video on near forgotten subject. One technical point- you cannot take a percentage with decibels! The reduction achieved was actually 100x quieter, not '15%'. HTH
Great video , please use the metric system next time. Imperial doesn't make sense.
I wouldn't care how ugly the plane looks if it can carry me from CA to Tokyo in 3 hours, hopefully will see this happening in my life time
nice History Chanel ^^
I wouldn't be surprised to see modernized F-15s flying, when the F-22, and F-35 are retired from service. That's the difference between great thinking, and goofy thinking. Stealth has it's limits, also it's place on the battlefield. Steath everything is goofy. The Eagle is anything but goofy. Electronics change, engines change, weapons change. Aerodynamics do not change. It's the aerodynamics of the Eagle that continues to make this "old design" great! When the current generation of stealth aircraft are defeated by anti-stealth countermeasures? Eagles with improved weapons, electronics, and engines, will still rule the skies. Aerodynamics is also why defense contractors talk about "generation" fighters. The bigger the number, the higher the cost! What good is a bigger number, when you can't afford to build, or operate it? The real reason the F-22 production ended, is clearly classified. Keeping it classified is goofy! As it's not difficult to understand why? As stealthy as it was? It's primary stealth advantage was effectively countered. Making it too expensive to buy and fly. This makes the Eagle, the best fighter flying. When the engines, weapons and electronics developed for 6th generation fighters? Are incorporated into the Eagle? The Eagles will remain supreme!
2 weeks and 7.2 million veiws
Totally remarkable! It's surprisingly engaging and entertaining.
no wonder it's ugly af if it was made by the same person who created 914 porsche.
Absolutely delightful! It's full of pleasant and unexpected surprises.
Couldn't agree more! It's unexpectedly enjoyable and captivating.
If you ever want to succeed in life, in anything, rule number 1 is take your time.
He went 0/8 after missing every hook and lost his team the game
i love how THIS is the vehicle 13 million people wanted to see the most
If can buy i use for tekong
This triggers my OCD
High-quality production with a proper budget for sure, been looking for this type of content for a while.
Bluds playing... (Subnautica, Below zero) But on IRL difficulty.
Please turn the bgm down a bit. It’s a bit distracting. Otherwise top notch content.
“The oblique wing is much more refined aerodynamically compared to the swing wing and had lesser drag. In fact the AD-1 was designed to be as close to the optimal for all the flight regimes. Also, the aircraft was designed to have an elliptical lift distribution to reduce induced drag. on the other hand, the variable geometry aircraft did not offer any significant advantages over fixed wing baseline aircraft. However, the asymmetric stall of the oblique wing aircraft would cause problems as one side of the wing is swept forwards and the other side is swept towards the rear.” Yeah as someone intuitively posted in the comments it has a bad stall and it didnt seem to be a huge advantage compared with fixed wing planes.