Why the title " in Canada " ? Is he the head of another country ?
@juancamilorubioarboleda418529 минут бұрын
ni sabía que estábamos en medio de una guerra civil
@ibraheemghani732148 минут бұрын
Cost of housing, unaffordability, illegal immigration and poor management of our borders, crime, compromising national security, and the embracing of woke ideology and policies (including the carbon tax, funding of bureaucracy, and decriminalization of hard drugs/safe supply). That's why Trudeau is so unpopular. Also, he has no remorse for the pain and suffering he has caused the Canadian people.
@nathanbanks2354Сағат бұрын
5:52 Netanyahu did delay the Rafah offensive by over a month despite people on the war cabinet and normal cabinet wanting to go in sooner. Gantz, for example, said he would have gone into Rafah much earlier. Wasn't he waiting due to US pressure to wait for the civilians to move first?
@scythian404Сағат бұрын
Because he destroyed Canada and millions of outsiders come here that outsiders destroyed jobs laws rules and regulations in Canada so many Canadians have not jobs but students and illegal people have jobs because they work on very little amount of money
@the_real_mady1006Сағат бұрын
I am an immigrant and I will vote for PPC
@menzhulСағат бұрын
Trudeau and Freeland=dumb and dumber
@kuyakdey6679Сағат бұрын
They ask you to come in but they still let you feel that you don't belong in there. I am in Japan. It has been my dream country but when I came here, there are just to many stereotypes. Japan is great for travel destination but not a place for working.
@noobplayerhater9159Сағат бұрын
whats wrong with moving right? people think it means your racist and wanna burn CO2 all I want is to afford to live and own a house and raise a family. Trudeau has run billions of dollars of deficit and continues to bury tax payers for decades to come. Far right this far right that what has left leaning done other then create division and debt
@akbarsnack9718Сағат бұрын
Apakah orang Vietnam sekarang mayoritas orang Han?
@ssabi041Сағат бұрын
HazBulAaaaa
@pmreid4262Сағат бұрын
It is NOT a "Conservative coalition". It is just the Conservative Party. We are not like countries that have proportional representation. Trudeau PROMISED to give us some form of proportional representation, and then promptly broke that promise. As well, you have not mentioned the "Foreign Interference" scandal which is unfolding now. Many Canadians have firmly believed, for many years, that Trudeau is closely tied to Beijing. I am one person who believes that.
@jplopez7020Сағат бұрын
What civil war? I think you might be confused about the current situation in Colombia. What we have is a guerrilla problem in some parts of the country that has been ongoing for decades and will continue unless people stop using drugs like cocaine. Our country might not have the strongest economy in South America, but we have managed to endure these difficulties and maintain a democracy and in some way stable economy.
@gipsonjoseph82072 сағат бұрын
China cannot be trusted. Thats the lesson. Sooner countries realise this better they can strategise.
@PearlKing212 сағат бұрын
I'm hoping there will be a housing crisis so I can buy cheaply when I sell a few houses in 2025. As a backup plan, I've been thinking about purchasing stocks. What advice do you have for choosing the best buying time? On the one hand, I continue to read and see trading earnings of over $500k each week. On the other side, I keep hearing that the market is out of control and experiencing a dead cat bounce. Why does this happen?
@AriaLockwood2 сағат бұрын
Investing in real estate and stocks might be a wise choice, particularly if you have a sound trading plan that can get you through profitable days.
@JoshuaDonavan222 сағат бұрын
You're not doing anything wrong; you simply lack the expertise necessary to make money in a bad market. In these difficult circumstances, only really skilled experts who witnessed the 2008 financial crisis can expect to generate a large wage.
@Thomas_danСағат бұрын
Recently, I've been considering the possibility of speaking with consultants. I need guidance because I'm an adult, but I'm not sure if their services would be all that helpful.
@JoshuaDonavan22Сағат бұрын
My CFA, Desiree Ruth Hoffman, is a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.
@AriaLockwoodСағат бұрын
Thank you for this tip. I must say, Desiree appears to be quite knowledgeable. After coming across her online page, I thoroughly went through her resume, and I must say, it was quite impressive. I reached out to her, and I have booked a session with her.
@el_translator24122 сағат бұрын
1:14 so you won't mention that HZB raided Israel amidst rocket fire and killed and kidnapped IDF soldiers? why do you make it sound as if the war just casually started? you guy are some filthy jihadist fanboys @TLDRnewsGlobal
@eastpaw2 сағат бұрын
Looking over from Asia, we've been wondering why Canada has let Trudeau run free all this while.
@YanivSha2 сағат бұрын
Living in Israel, my perspective has changed too drastically to enjoy your videos anymore. This is not true journalism, this is content for the algorithm to appease your target audience. Can’t say I blame you, but I’m out. Unsubscribe 👎🏼
@user-uq2ko4jq2v2 сағат бұрын
Freeland is on the board of trustees for the WEF .. bad idea if she takes over the party
@SithStudy2 сағат бұрын
Trudeau is a part of the globalist ethnic-replacement party, that’s why we hate him so much.
@stevet5992 сағат бұрын
You need to live through all this to believe it. Trudeau is corrupt, lies, and can afford to be a far left socialist (communist or fascist (i.e. WEF, WHO)...at this level, it's the same thing 😢
@vardekpetrovic97162 сағат бұрын
"Spill over into the EU" how? Why is this just glanced over? I get that there is masses of muslims in countries like Sweden that wants the state of Israel not to exist. But full out war? nah. Even the most muslim city in all of sweden, whilst not safe is a LOT safer than lets say Baltimore or St Louis.
@varyyami-animenewscenter82372 сағат бұрын
Americans have baseball.. PH have politics..
@Aldous9442 сағат бұрын
Trudeau and Freeland are equally unpopular in Canada. They are cut from the same cloth and hang out in the same elitist society, while doing next to nothing for Canada and Canadians. Freeland may become Liberal leader after Justin steps down. He won't be happy as an MP representing his constituents. That does nothing for his ego or lust for power. He will leave, and Freeland may step in as Lib leader, but I don't think she will ever become PM. She is another dangerous ideologue.
@osamasalekin20452 сағат бұрын
" 60 000 DISPLACED " and when its about Lebanese its " 94000 FLEE THIER HOMES ". nice work there cz u effectively created this sense that the israelies were forced to displace themselves, while the Lebanese flew away, as if they had a choice. good job, u will receive some more funding this year i hope. keep it up mate. btw, u stuttered a bit while changing the narrative, so please consider practicing a bit more. will you? Time frame: 2:31
@AL-lh2ht2 сағат бұрын
buddy, those are synonyms, it's not that deep.
@osamasalekin20452 сағат бұрын
@@AL-lh2ht yeah bro they are synonyms but synonyms doesn't mean 'same'. If someone tells you why are you fleeing your homes, he means why did you choose to leave your house, while if someone asks why are you getting displaced, it means why were you forced to leave your house. it might not sound deep, but yeah it does change the narrative, just like how media calls Palestinian deaths as ' they died', but zionist deaths as 'they were killed' (yeah, i gave two examples here 🙃🙃).
@Jenna-hu7mp2 сағат бұрын
Arrogent, gaslighting, highly authoritarian president that gave two standing ovations to a literal N*zi, and is very racist, being caught wearing blackface. There are more reasons to not like him than there are to like him.
@mohammedabdullah41112 сағат бұрын
There's a really simple explanation it's because Israel is a settler colonial genocidal project engaged in a televised genocide against the indigenous population of Palestine; all decent human beings find it abhorrent. Young people are unburdened by holocaust guilt and they have access to information as opposed to being entirely reliant on Zionist controlled legacy media. The young also have more courage to speak the truth as opposed to ones who worry about losing their job if they criticise Israel.
@Tmb11123 сағат бұрын
If these measures were instituted last month, how tf are you taking May data as an indicator that the measures the CCP put in place aren’t working. The whole reason they put those measures is because the situation was getting worse in May it sounds like, and you just ignored that. If they just put these measures in last month, then there wouldn’t be results in May. You saying that May data being worse proves that these measures don’t work is just really, really dumb. I’m no fan of the CCP at all. But that was a really weird basis to put this video out. Seems like clickbait tbh
@jonmackenzie91673 сағат бұрын
Fk trudeau Greenlight this ckroach Fkn lineup would be endless
@anthonyhulse12483 сағат бұрын
How has his net worth ballooned to 90 million while supposedly serving the country. Meanwhile people’s ability to pay for housing, food and travel has dropped. Something stinks. 😷 🐡
@vardekpetrovic97163 сағат бұрын
What is a gorilla campaign? Did you mean guerilla campaign? ue in the word is spanish in origin and just like the word "que" the UE saound is a hard E. Noone speaking spanish would say qUe when using the word. In english it is pronounced gerillah according to the oxford standard dictionary. "/ɡəˈrɪlə/"
@vociferon-heraldofthewinte77633 сағат бұрын
Could it be that only 7% of Canadians lived below the poverty line before Trudeau and Freeland and now it’s 25%? Canada has almost become a 3rd. World country under these folk “leadership@.
@TalKessler3 сағат бұрын
That's not Tiberius.
@gilles59743 сағат бұрын
I hope that Poilievre never becomes the Prime Minister of our beautiful country...he lacks diplomatic abilities and is too much like Mr Trump in USA.
@HCIbn3 сағат бұрын
Israel is looking for a fight that they can't win without U.S military aid.
@PomegranateChocolate3 сағат бұрын
One of Indian delusion is the belief that India is a victim of China's aggression. To understand how this perception arises, we must consider the dramatic shift in India's geopolitical viewpoint after gaining independence from British rule. British historian Arnold Toynbee noted that while Indians were subjects of the British Crown, they were largely indifferent to British India's borders and even condemned the British Empire's annexation of distant territories as immoral. In 1921, India's Congress Party went so far as to urge neighboring states not to enter into treaties with the Imperial Power (the British Raj). However, once Indians assumed sovereignty, their perspective underwent a complete reversal. Suddenly, the once-distant lands of the British Indian Empire were seen as sacred Indian territory. Even more alarmingly, India began asserting territorial claims over areas that had never been claimed, let alone controlled, by the British Raj. In essence, aspiring to emulate the British Raj, India became expansionist in its own right. In Arnold Toynbee's words: "It is queer that lines drawn by British officials should have been consecrated as precious national assets of the British Indian Empire's non-British successor states. At the time when those lines were drawn the transaction produced no stir among the . . . Indian . . . subjects, as they then were, of the British crown. If any of them paid any attention to what Durand and McMahon were doing, they will have written it off as just another move in the immoral game of power politics that the British Imperialists were playing at the Indian tax-payers' expense. The present consecration of these British-made lines as heirlooms in the successor states' national heritages is an unexpected and unfortunate turn of History's wheel." With respect to China, the best way is to give a chronological order of events leading to the present stalemate: 1912: In the first full year of the Republic of China after the fall of the Qing dynasty, the United States National Geographic Magazine dedicated an issue to China. Accompanying the issue is a large and detailed fold-out map of China. The map clearly shows that Dirang Dzong (德讓宗) and Tawang (達旺) are within the boundary of China. 1943: British India likely calculated that dealing with the Lhasa government was easier than with the Republic of China's Nationalist Government in extracting land concessions and proposed to the United States to recognize Tibet's right to exchange diplomatic representatives with other powers. The Americans rejected this proposal: "The Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and that the Chinese constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims." 1944: British India annexed Dirang Dzong (德讓宗), a Tibetan-settled area. Dzong means fort in Tibetan. The Chinese Government (the Nationalist Government of the Republic of China, seated in Kunming at the time because of World War II) protested to the British. So did the Tibetan Lhasa government. 1945: British India intruded into the tribal area of South Tibet. February 1947: The Chinese Nationalist Government lodged a complaint with the Indian mission, which was by then newly established in China, on British India's border intrusions into Chinese territory. August 1947: Britain left South Asia, and India was created as the successor polity to the departed British. India's creation means that a country that historically did not exist suddenly appears on China's doorstep. October 1947: The Tibetan Lhasa Government dispatched a formal request to New Delhi, asking the newly independent Indian Government to withdraw all its predecessors' intrusions into the territory between the McMahon Line and the traditional border beneath the foothills and return a wide swath of territory from Ladakh to Assam, including Sikkim and the Darjeeling district. 1949: When the defeat of the Nationalist Government in China's civil war was imminent, the Republic of China's ambassador in New Delhi reminded the Indian Government that China did not recognize the McMahon Line and held the Simla Convention invalid. October 1949: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) took control of the mainland, and its civil war rival, the Republic of China, retreated to Taiwan. December 1949: India recognized the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government, effectively cutting off the diplomatic channel the Republic of China used to deliver its protests to India. February 1951: India annexed Tawang (達旺), the birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to the four-hundred-year-old Tawang Monastery. The Tibetan authorities in Lhasa protested but were simply informed by the Indian political officer that India was taking over Tawang. The Tibetans protested again, accusing the Indian Government of 'seizing as its own what did not belong to it.' The Tibetans went on to ask New Delhi to withdraw its forces from Tawang immediately. The protests were ignored. The Republic of China (which had already retreated to Taiwan by then and had no diplomatic relation with India) also vehemently denounced India's territorial travesty. Curiously the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) made no noise. 1954: India published a new map showing South Tibet as part of India. The map also shows the two neighbors of China, Sikkim and Bhutan, as part of India. Sikkim has been a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years and has enjoyed good relations. In the 18th century, Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas, and the Sikkim king fled to China seeking help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition to Sikkim, expelled the Gorkhas, and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim remained unmolested for the rest of its history until it was annexed by India in 1975. Bhutan is another neighbor of China, and their proximity is evident simply by comparing the flags of Bhutan and the Qing dynasty of China.
@PomegranateChocolate3 сағат бұрын
January 1959: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) commented for the first time on the issue of South Tibet when Zhou Enlai, in a letter to Nehru, offered to concede South Tibet to India. However, India rejected the offer, as it also claims Aksai Chin as part of India. Aksai Chin is located in an area that is very hard to access from the Indian side due to difficult terrain. This is evidenced by the fact that China was able to build a road there over two years without India even noticing, and India only became aware of it when reading an article from China describing the construction project. This clearly indicates that India not only has no control over the area but also lacks visual access to the region. 1960: India started establishing posts (border markers) north of South Tibet (north of the McMahon Line) and proclaiming that it has the right to unilaterally 'improve' the McMahon Line as it sees fit. October 1962: After years of warning, China attacked India's position in South Tibet and recovered Tawang shortly. Three weeks later, in a second wave, China recovered the whole of South Tibet. November 1962: China unilaterally withdrew back to the north of the McMahon line. 1975: India annexed Sikkim. 1987: India made South Tibet a state and renamed it the so-called Arunachal Pradesh. The Republic of China (Taiwan) put out a statement denouncing India. Here is the statement: "In regard to the issue of the Indian government's illegal occupation of our country's territory and the establishment of the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh,' the foreign ministry of the Republic of China issued the following announcement at midnight: India's illegal occupation of our country's territory has been repeatedly stated by the Government of the Republic of China as something it will not recognize. Recently, the Indian Congress unilaterally passed the establishment of 'Arunachal Pradesh' to the south of the so-called McMahon Line. The Indian Government also made it a state. The Government of the Republic of China once again solemnly proclaims that the Government of India intends to legitimize its illegal occupation of Chinese territory. The Government of the Republic of China regards this as illegal, void, and absolutely not recognized." 2008: With the return of Hong Kong to China, Britain effectively withdrew from its colonial involvement in Asia, and Tibet lost its utility as a potential bargaining chip in British negotiations with China concerning Hong Kong. With no remaining interests in Tibet, Britain could afford to be forthright for once. The British government issued a statement acknowledging China's sovereignty over Tibet (previously recognized as suzerainty, not sovereignty). This statement, endorsed by both the Conservative and Labour parties, is notable for its candor in admitting Britain's past territorial ambitions in Tibet and adopts an almost apologetic tone. Here is an excerpt: "...But our position is unusual for one reason of history that has been imported into the present: the anachronism of our formal position on whether Tibet is part of China, and whether in fact we harbour continued designs to see the break-up of China. We do not. Our ability to get our points across has sometimes been clouded by the position the UK took at the start of the 20th century on the status of Tibet, a position based on the geopolitics of the time. Our recognition of China's "special position" in Tibet developed from the outdated concept of suzerainty. Some have used this to cast doubt on the aims we are pursuing and to claim that we are denying Chinese sovereignty over a large part of its own territory. We have made clear to the Chinese Government, and publicly, that we do not support Tibetan independence. Like every other EU member state, and the United States, we regard Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China. " 2014: A Tibetan Chinese named Nido Tania from Arunachal Pradesh (occupied South Tibet) went to Delhi and was beaten to death because he 'looked Chinese.' 2024: In the 1990s, India subtly probed the People's Republic of China (PRC), leading to the inference that China's position on South Tibet had hardened, despite the PRC officially maintaining ambiguity on the matter. It has become evident that China's earlier offer to cede South Tibet is no longer available, as China has explicitly stated that South Tibet is part of its territory. This stance mirrors the positions of both the Tibetan Lhasa Government and its civil war rival, the Republic of China (Taiwan). In hindsight, India had a chance to settle its border with China to its advantage, but it was too greedy because it also claims Aksai Chin, an area that neither British India nor India has ever controlled. However, that opportunity has now passed. It's like they say, "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." It is evident that India is behaving in a manner reminiscent of how the British might have acted if they had not left the subcontinent. No one would argue that British India was a victim of China's aggression, yet this is the narrative India wishes to propagate. One can understand India's current apprehension towards China, given that it holds onto disputed territory while the rightful owner grows stronger. This sense of threat from China is entirely self-inflicted, and India has no one to blame but itself.
@johnmcnab42733 сағат бұрын
All I want to know is, which factions are the characters in Betty La Fea allied with
@loganmystic16763 сағат бұрын
Notice the Arab countries are not directly involved but using proxies like Hezbollah or Hamas to fight Israel. They are still fearing the possibility of another defeat if they directly confront Israel army or they for some strange reason do not want to make this whole war appear to be a religious war.
@mikethornton72633 сағат бұрын
Unpopular is putting it politely The guys a theif and liar Only hete to line his pockets he doesnt vare about Canada or Canadians
@MrMann7033 сағат бұрын
Foreign owned politician
@cheradenine19803 сағат бұрын
5:45 sorry but that’s BS. Bibi is a patriot and seeks only security for his nation. He’s not doing anything just to stay in power and even suggesting such a notion is a poor take for your otherwise respectable channel.
@keterscp10643 сағат бұрын
😂 literally everyone from world leaders to big media to even CIA report support that he was to stay in power by prolonging the war and you want to convince people overwise with trust me bro argument 😂 what a joke
@MichaelThoman4 сағат бұрын
Trudeau’s legacy will be the complete destruction of the LPC when they are defeated in the next election. After long overdue judicial investigations of his government’s track record , they will be labelled a criminal organization for racketeering amongst other charges.
@mtlnascarfan4 сағат бұрын
Trudeau isn't popular because he's shown time and time again that he doesn't give a shit about the country and its citizens and that he's only committed to increasing his own personal wealth. His party is constantly increasing taxes and continuously brings in more immigrants from other countries as well as allowing corruption to run rampant in Quebec without ANY repercussions or criminal charges being filed. He's as corrupt as a politician can be.
@sambanaei29844 сағат бұрын
All for conservatives
@samvarupa29294 сағат бұрын
India was never with China India has deal call quad Australia US England and EU India was on stand by with China for Century’s
@maryparker674 сағат бұрын
We are sick of the corruption and the spending of tax dollars...,he is a disgsuting person ,I will never vote liberal !
Пікірлер
Who likes france?
2:08 a big mistake
Why the title " in Canada " ? Is he the head of another country ?
ni sabía que estábamos en medio de una guerra civil
Cost of housing, unaffordability, illegal immigration and poor management of our borders, crime, compromising national security, and the embracing of woke ideology and policies (including the carbon tax, funding of bureaucracy, and decriminalization of hard drugs/safe supply). That's why Trudeau is so unpopular. Also, he has no remorse for the pain and suffering he has caused the Canadian people.
5:52 Netanyahu did delay the Rafah offensive by over a month despite people on the war cabinet and normal cabinet wanting to go in sooner. Gantz, for example, said he would have gone into Rafah much earlier. Wasn't he waiting due to US pressure to wait for the civilians to move first?
Because he destroyed Canada and millions of outsiders come here that outsiders destroyed jobs laws rules and regulations in Canada so many Canadians have not jobs but students and illegal people have jobs because they work on very little amount of money
I am an immigrant and I will vote for PPC
Trudeau and Freeland=dumb and dumber
They ask you to come in but they still let you feel that you don't belong in there. I am in Japan. It has been my dream country but when I came here, there are just to many stereotypes. Japan is great for travel destination but not a place for working.
whats wrong with moving right? people think it means your racist and wanna burn CO2 all I want is to afford to live and own a house and raise a family. Trudeau has run billions of dollars of deficit and continues to bury tax payers for decades to come. Far right this far right that what has left leaning done other then create division and debt
Apakah orang Vietnam sekarang mayoritas orang Han?
HazBulAaaaa
It is NOT a "Conservative coalition". It is just the Conservative Party. We are not like countries that have proportional representation. Trudeau PROMISED to give us some form of proportional representation, and then promptly broke that promise. As well, you have not mentioned the "Foreign Interference" scandal which is unfolding now. Many Canadians have firmly believed, for many years, that Trudeau is closely tied to Beijing. I am one person who believes that.
What civil war? I think you might be confused about the current situation in Colombia. What we have is a guerrilla problem in some parts of the country that has been ongoing for decades and will continue unless people stop using drugs like cocaine. Our country might not have the strongest economy in South America, but we have managed to endure these difficulties and maintain a democracy and in some way stable economy.
China cannot be trusted. Thats the lesson. Sooner countries realise this better they can strategise.
I'm hoping there will be a housing crisis so I can buy cheaply when I sell a few houses in 2025. As a backup plan, I've been thinking about purchasing stocks. What advice do you have for choosing the best buying time? On the one hand, I continue to read and see trading earnings of over $500k each week. On the other side, I keep hearing that the market is out of control and experiencing a dead cat bounce. Why does this happen?
Investing in real estate and stocks might be a wise choice, particularly if you have a sound trading plan that can get you through profitable days.
You're not doing anything wrong; you simply lack the expertise necessary to make money in a bad market. In these difficult circumstances, only really skilled experts who witnessed the 2008 financial crisis can expect to generate a large wage.
Recently, I've been considering the possibility of speaking with consultants. I need guidance because I'm an adult, but I'm not sure if their services would be all that helpful.
My CFA, Desiree Ruth Hoffman, is a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.
Thank you for this tip. I must say, Desiree appears to be quite knowledgeable. After coming across her online page, I thoroughly went through her resume, and I must say, it was quite impressive. I reached out to her, and I have booked a session with her.
1:14 so you won't mention that HZB raided Israel amidst rocket fire and killed and kidnapped IDF soldiers? why do you make it sound as if the war just casually started? you guy are some filthy jihadist fanboys @TLDRnewsGlobal
Looking over from Asia, we've been wondering why Canada has let Trudeau run free all this while.
Living in Israel, my perspective has changed too drastically to enjoy your videos anymore. This is not true journalism, this is content for the algorithm to appease your target audience. Can’t say I blame you, but I’m out. Unsubscribe 👎🏼
Freeland is on the board of trustees for the WEF .. bad idea if she takes over the party
Trudeau is a part of the globalist ethnic-replacement party, that’s why we hate him so much.
You need to live through all this to believe it. Trudeau is corrupt, lies, and can afford to be a far left socialist (communist or fascist (i.e. WEF, WHO)...at this level, it's the same thing 😢
"Spill over into the EU" how? Why is this just glanced over? I get that there is masses of muslims in countries like Sweden that wants the state of Israel not to exist. But full out war? nah. Even the most muslim city in all of sweden, whilst not safe is a LOT safer than lets say Baltimore or St Louis.
Americans have baseball.. PH have politics..
Trudeau and Freeland are equally unpopular in Canada. They are cut from the same cloth and hang out in the same elitist society, while doing next to nothing for Canada and Canadians. Freeland may become Liberal leader after Justin steps down. He won't be happy as an MP representing his constituents. That does nothing for his ego or lust for power. He will leave, and Freeland may step in as Lib leader, but I don't think she will ever become PM. She is another dangerous ideologue.
" 60 000 DISPLACED " and when its about Lebanese its " 94000 FLEE THIER HOMES ". nice work there cz u effectively created this sense that the israelies were forced to displace themselves, while the Lebanese flew away, as if they had a choice. good job, u will receive some more funding this year i hope. keep it up mate. btw, u stuttered a bit while changing the narrative, so please consider practicing a bit more. will you? Time frame: 2:31
buddy, those are synonyms, it's not that deep.
@@AL-lh2ht yeah bro they are synonyms but synonyms doesn't mean 'same'. If someone tells you why are you fleeing your homes, he means why did you choose to leave your house, while if someone asks why are you getting displaced, it means why were you forced to leave your house. it might not sound deep, but yeah it does change the narrative, just like how media calls Palestinian deaths as ' they died', but zionist deaths as 'they were killed' (yeah, i gave two examples here 🙃🙃).
Arrogent, gaslighting, highly authoritarian president that gave two standing ovations to a literal N*zi, and is very racist, being caught wearing blackface. There are more reasons to not like him than there are to like him.
There's a really simple explanation it's because Israel is a settler colonial genocidal project engaged in a televised genocide against the indigenous population of Palestine; all decent human beings find it abhorrent. Young people are unburdened by holocaust guilt and they have access to information as opposed to being entirely reliant on Zionist controlled legacy media. The young also have more courage to speak the truth as opposed to ones who worry about losing their job if they criticise Israel.
If these measures were instituted last month, how tf are you taking May data as an indicator that the measures the CCP put in place aren’t working. The whole reason they put those measures is because the situation was getting worse in May it sounds like, and you just ignored that. If they just put these measures in last month, then there wouldn’t be results in May. You saying that May data being worse proves that these measures don’t work is just really, really dumb. I’m no fan of the CCP at all. But that was a really weird basis to put this video out. Seems like clickbait tbh
Fk trudeau Greenlight this ckroach Fkn lineup would be endless
How has his net worth ballooned to 90 million while supposedly serving the country. Meanwhile people’s ability to pay for housing, food and travel has dropped. Something stinks. 😷 🐡
What is a gorilla campaign? Did you mean guerilla campaign? ue in the word is spanish in origin and just like the word "que" the UE saound is a hard E. Noone speaking spanish would say qUe when using the word. In english it is pronounced gerillah according to the oxford standard dictionary. "/ɡəˈrɪlə/"
Could it be that only 7% of Canadians lived below the poverty line before Trudeau and Freeland and now it’s 25%? Canada has almost become a 3rd. World country under these folk “leadership@.
That's not Tiberius.
I hope that Poilievre never becomes the Prime Minister of our beautiful country...he lacks diplomatic abilities and is too much like Mr Trump in USA.
Israel is looking for a fight that they can't win without U.S military aid.
One of Indian delusion is the belief that India is a victim of China's aggression. To understand how this perception arises, we must consider the dramatic shift in India's geopolitical viewpoint after gaining independence from British rule. British historian Arnold Toynbee noted that while Indians were subjects of the British Crown, they were largely indifferent to British India's borders and even condemned the British Empire's annexation of distant territories as immoral. In 1921, India's Congress Party went so far as to urge neighboring states not to enter into treaties with the Imperial Power (the British Raj). However, once Indians assumed sovereignty, their perspective underwent a complete reversal. Suddenly, the once-distant lands of the British Indian Empire were seen as sacred Indian territory. Even more alarmingly, India began asserting territorial claims over areas that had never been claimed, let alone controlled, by the British Raj. In essence, aspiring to emulate the British Raj, India became expansionist in its own right. In Arnold Toynbee's words: "It is queer that lines drawn by British officials should have been consecrated as precious national assets of the British Indian Empire's non-British successor states. At the time when those lines were drawn the transaction produced no stir among the . . . Indian . . . subjects, as they then were, of the British crown. If any of them paid any attention to what Durand and McMahon were doing, they will have written it off as just another move in the immoral game of power politics that the British Imperialists were playing at the Indian tax-payers' expense. The present consecration of these British-made lines as heirlooms in the successor states' national heritages is an unexpected and unfortunate turn of History's wheel." With respect to China, the best way is to give a chronological order of events leading to the present stalemate: 1912: In the first full year of the Republic of China after the fall of the Qing dynasty, the United States National Geographic Magazine dedicated an issue to China. Accompanying the issue is a large and detailed fold-out map of China. The map clearly shows that Dirang Dzong (德讓宗) and Tawang (達旺) are within the boundary of China. 1943: British India likely calculated that dealing with the Lhasa government was easier than with the Republic of China's Nationalist Government in extracting land concessions and proposed to the United States to recognize Tibet's right to exchange diplomatic representatives with other powers. The Americans rejected this proposal: "The Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and that the Chinese constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims." 1944: British India annexed Dirang Dzong (德讓宗), a Tibetan-settled area. Dzong means fort in Tibetan. The Chinese Government (the Nationalist Government of the Republic of China, seated in Kunming at the time because of World War II) protested to the British. So did the Tibetan Lhasa government. 1945: British India intruded into the tribal area of South Tibet. February 1947: The Chinese Nationalist Government lodged a complaint with the Indian mission, which was by then newly established in China, on British India's border intrusions into Chinese territory. August 1947: Britain left South Asia, and India was created as the successor polity to the departed British. India's creation means that a country that historically did not exist suddenly appears on China's doorstep. October 1947: The Tibetan Lhasa Government dispatched a formal request to New Delhi, asking the newly independent Indian Government to withdraw all its predecessors' intrusions into the territory between the McMahon Line and the traditional border beneath the foothills and return a wide swath of territory from Ladakh to Assam, including Sikkim and the Darjeeling district. 1949: When the defeat of the Nationalist Government in China's civil war was imminent, the Republic of China's ambassador in New Delhi reminded the Indian Government that China did not recognize the McMahon Line and held the Simla Convention invalid. October 1949: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) took control of the mainland, and its civil war rival, the Republic of China, retreated to Taiwan. December 1949: India recognized the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government, effectively cutting off the diplomatic channel the Republic of China used to deliver its protests to India. February 1951: India annexed Tawang (達旺), the birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to the four-hundred-year-old Tawang Monastery. The Tibetan authorities in Lhasa protested but were simply informed by the Indian political officer that India was taking over Tawang. The Tibetans protested again, accusing the Indian Government of 'seizing as its own what did not belong to it.' The Tibetans went on to ask New Delhi to withdraw its forces from Tawang immediately. The protests were ignored. The Republic of China (which had already retreated to Taiwan by then and had no diplomatic relation with India) also vehemently denounced India's territorial travesty. Curiously the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) made no noise. 1954: India published a new map showing South Tibet as part of India. The map also shows the two neighbors of China, Sikkim and Bhutan, as part of India. Sikkim has been a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years and has enjoyed good relations. In the 18th century, Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas, and the Sikkim king fled to China seeking help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition to Sikkim, expelled the Gorkhas, and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim remained unmolested for the rest of its history until it was annexed by India in 1975. Bhutan is another neighbor of China, and their proximity is evident simply by comparing the flags of Bhutan and the Qing dynasty of China.
January 1959: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) commented for the first time on the issue of South Tibet when Zhou Enlai, in a letter to Nehru, offered to concede South Tibet to India. However, India rejected the offer, as it also claims Aksai Chin as part of India. Aksai Chin is located in an area that is very hard to access from the Indian side due to difficult terrain. This is evidenced by the fact that China was able to build a road there over two years without India even noticing, and India only became aware of it when reading an article from China describing the construction project. This clearly indicates that India not only has no control over the area but also lacks visual access to the region. 1960: India started establishing posts (border markers) north of South Tibet (north of the McMahon Line) and proclaiming that it has the right to unilaterally 'improve' the McMahon Line as it sees fit. October 1962: After years of warning, China attacked India's position in South Tibet and recovered Tawang shortly. Three weeks later, in a second wave, China recovered the whole of South Tibet. November 1962: China unilaterally withdrew back to the north of the McMahon line. 1975: India annexed Sikkim. 1987: India made South Tibet a state and renamed it the so-called Arunachal Pradesh. The Republic of China (Taiwan) put out a statement denouncing India. Here is the statement: "In regard to the issue of the Indian government's illegal occupation of our country's territory and the establishment of the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh,' the foreign ministry of the Republic of China issued the following announcement at midnight: India's illegal occupation of our country's territory has been repeatedly stated by the Government of the Republic of China as something it will not recognize. Recently, the Indian Congress unilaterally passed the establishment of 'Arunachal Pradesh' to the south of the so-called McMahon Line. The Indian Government also made it a state. The Government of the Republic of China once again solemnly proclaims that the Government of India intends to legitimize its illegal occupation of Chinese territory. The Government of the Republic of China regards this as illegal, void, and absolutely not recognized." 2008: With the return of Hong Kong to China, Britain effectively withdrew from its colonial involvement in Asia, and Tibet lost its utility as a potential bargaining chip in British negotiations with China concerning Hong Kong. With no remaining interests in Tibet, Britain could afford to be forthright for once. The British government issued a statement acknowledging China's sovereignty over Tibet (previously recognized as suzerainty, not sovereignty). This statement, endorsed by both the Conservative and Labour parties, is notable for its candor in admitting Britain's past territorial ambitions in Tibet and adopts an almost apologetic tone. Here is an excerpt: "...But our position is unusual for one reason of history that has been imported into the present: the anachronism of our formal position on whether Tibet is part of China, and whether in fact we harbour continued designs to see the break-up of China. We do not. Our ability to get our points across has sometimes been clouded by the position the UK took at the start of the 20th century on the status of Tibet, a position based on the geopolitics of the time. Our recognition of China's "special position" in Tibet developed from the outdated concept of suzerainty. Some have used this to cast doubt on the aims we are pursuing and to claim that we are denying Chinese sovereignty over a large part of its own territory. We have made clear to the Chinese Government, and publicly, that we do not support Tibetan independence. Like every other EU member state, and the United States, we regard Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China. " 2014: A Tibetan Chinese named Nido Tania from Arunachal Pradesh (occupied South Tibet) went to Delhi and was beaten to death because he 'looked Chinese.' 2024: In the 1990s, India subtly probed the People's Republic of China (PRC), leading to the inference that China's position on South Tibet had hardened, despite the PRC officially maintaining ambiguity on the matter. It has become evident that China's earlier offer to cede South Tibet is no longer available, as China has explicitly stated that South Tibet is part of its territory. This stance mirrors the positions of both the Tibetan Lhasa Government and its civil war rival, the Republic of China (Taiwan). In hindsight, India had a chance to settle its border with China to its advantage, but it was too greedy because it also claims Aksai Chin, an area that neither British India nor India has ever controlled. However, that opportunity has now passed. It's like they say, "never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity." It is evident that India is behaving in a manner reminiscent of how the British might have acted if they had not left the subcontinent. No one would argue that British India was a victim of China's aggression, yet this is the narrative India wishes to propagate. One can understand India's current apprehension towards China, given that it holds onto disputed territory while the rightful owner grows stronger. This sense of threat from China is entirely self-inflicted, and India has no one to blame but itself.
All I want to know is, which factions are the characters in Betty La Fea allied with
Notice the Arab countries are not directly involved but using proxies like Hezbollah or Hamas to fight Israel. They are still fearing the possibility of another defeat if they directly confront Israel army or they for some strange reason do not want to make this whole war appear to be a religious war.
Unpopular is putting it politely The guys a theif and liar Only hete to line his pockets he doesnt vare about Canada or Canadians
Foreign owned politician
5:45 sorry but that’s BS. Bibi is a patriot and seeks only security for his nation. He’s not doing anything just to stay in power and even suggesting such a notion is a poor take for your otherwise respectable channel.
😂 literally everyone from world leaders to big media to even CIA report support that he was to stay in power by prolonging the war and you want to convince people overwise with trust me bro argument 😂 what a joke
Trudeau’s legacy will be the complete destruction of the LPC when they are defeated in the next election. After long overdue judicial investigations of his government’s track record , they will be labelled a criminal organization for racketeering amongst other charges.
Trudeau isn't popular because he's shown time and time again that he doesn't give a shit about the country and its citizens and that he's only committed to increasing his own personal wealth. His party is constantly increasing taxes and continuously brings in more immigrants from other countries as well as allowing corruption to run rampant in Quebec without ANY repercussions or criminal charges being filed. He's as corrupt as a politician can be.
All for conservatives
India was never with China India has deal call quad Australia US England and EU India was on stand by with China for Century’s
We are sick of the corruption and the spending of tax dollars...,he is a disgsuting person ,I will never vote liberal !
🗞️📰🇺🇸🇲🇽🖱️🧀🐁