Wow, this is incredible. Layering the various photos to get the high resolution was mesmerizing, thanks for the great video!

For the idiots doubting, last zoom was from Lunar Orbiter satellite. It's not possible to zoom from earth to see such small objects. It's too far.

@doctormarazanvose4373

7 ай бұрын

and for the other idiots who don't doubt and probably should - how come the resolution is so low considering the same equipment on a satellite orbiting Earth can give higher resolution images through a much denser atmosphere and at a higher orbit?

@ann_onn

6 ай бұрын

@@doctormarazanvose4373 Because the LRO isn't the same as satellites orbiting the Earth to take photos. Its job wasn't to look at the landing sites - that was a small side benefit. It's job was to map out the entire Moon, at a resolution good enough to identify potential resources for future missions. NASA has no great interest in getting high-res pictures of the landing sites. They know exactly what is there, and we _already_ have thousands of good photos taken during Apollo.

@doctormarazanvose4373

6 ай бұрын

@@ann_onn sorry to burst your bubble but the camera equipment used was the same. There are articles about it showing the resolution possible to achieve. As for your reasoning that NASA has no great interest. Do you speak for them? How do you know their motivations? One thing is for sure. For over 50 years they have not put this argument to bed and they could easily have done so. I'll leave you with one question to ponder: Why have they still not managed to design a space suit capable of protecting a human on the moon? We allegedly managed it decades ago and now we can't.

@ann_onn

6 ай бұрын

@@doctormarazanvose4373 Why do you think "the camera equipment used was the same"? I'll happily answer anything else, *after* you answer that. Of course, you will not, because you're just another stupid conspiracy theorist.

@ann_onn

6 ай бұрын

@@doctormarazanvose4373 You claim that "the camera equipment used was the same.". It wasn't. If you think it was, show your evidence. From my side: search for the LRO, and you'll discover its close-up camera had a resolution of 0.5-meters. [1] "Do you speak for them?" - no, of course not. I'm not American, and I've no vested interest in NASA. You'll probably claim I do, because you're paranoid. "For over 50 years they have not put this argument to bed and they could easily have done so." - they have. Via thousands of photos, hundreds of hours of video, moon rocks unlike anything from Earth, people around the world receiving their live broadcasts as it happened, thousands of personal testimonies, full documentation of every nut and bolt, spaceships in museums, more recent pictures of the landing sites from India, Japan, China and Russia, and so much more. No matter how much evidence is given, a few idiots will claim it was fake, with absolutely no evidence. "Why have they still not managed to design a space suit capable of protecting a human on the moon? " - they have. Apollo 11 through to 17. " We allegedly managed it decades ago and now we can't." - why do you think we can't? Of course we can, if someone pays for it. They're going back next year. 1. Arizona State University. "Working with Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter LROC Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) Data".

Who would have thought that as our technology increased 1000 fold from 50 years ago, the population would get so stupid that they couldn't imagine our accomplishments.

@evonne315

7 ай бұрын

Sadly, people reject advancements all the time. My guess is peoples egos cannot handle the fact that others are far more capable than them.

@4faxache935

7 ай бұрын

You only need to look at many of the ancient structures still standing all around the World. There are many people who will balk at the idea that our ancient ancestors built them. They would prefer to say --- it was alien technology.

@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline

7 ай бұрын

​@@evonne315Why did all but one astronaut refuse to put their hand on the Bible and say they went to the moon? Why did all the photos toluene out studio quality when you can't even put unprocessed film through a xray machine at the airport? Where is the magic technology that got them there? Why will nasa not allow visits to these sites from private companies? What about the voice delay mistakes talking to the moon and back? Why was all the telemetry destroyed? What about the film that showed Apollo 11 in earth orbit while they faked a small earth in the capsule window? Answers are appreciated, thanks.

@ann_onn

6 ай бұрын

@@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline "Why did all but one astronaut refuse to put their hand on the Bible and say they went to the moon?" - because Bart Sibrel is an irritating moron, who was hounding them and trying to trick them into false admissions. "Why did all the photos toluene out studio quality" - they aren't. There's lots of bad photos. You don't often see them, because the best are selected. "...when you can't even put unprocessed film through a xray machine at the airport?" - you can, and they'll be fine. "Where is the magic technology that got them there?" - nothing magical about it. Just a huge rocket. Go see one in a museum. "Why will nasa not allow visits to these sites from private companies?" - they will. "What about the voice delay mistakes talking to the moon and back?" - the delay was about 1.5 seconds, which is exactly what you'd expect. That can be seen on all the recordings of the live broadcasts. Some of the footage has been edited to remove the delays, and conspiracy theorists use that to make stupid claims. "Why was all the telemetry destroyed?" - a) it wasn't *all* destroyed. b) Telemetry is a boring list of numbers, such as the temperature inside the cabin every 30 seconds. All useful data was put into the mission reports, so those tapes really aren't important. "What about the film that showed Apollo 11 in earth orbit while they faked a small earth in the capsule window?" - that's Sibrel again, lying about what you're looking at. It shows them closing a blind, not using a faked Earth. If you watch the original footage instead of his silly movie, you can hear them talking about what they're doing. Sibrel removed the sound, of course.

@maladetts

6 ай бұрын

It's always sweet when the feeble-minded project their stupidity and complain about themselves, still having no clue where they live in 2024 and whether spacecraft exist outside of sci-fi stories, while the entire KZread and internet have been for years at their disposal. In the meantime, the only "space accomplishments" can be only IMAGINED indeed. Let's see a single one in real life. Let's see that "space technology" that ""increased 1000 fold". No, still nothing? Who would have thought.

When I was a kid this was my dream and was obsessed with being an astronaut. I was glued to the tv whenever I had the chance during these missions and read every book I could get my hands on. Great and exciting times then.

@ApolloKid1961

7 күн бұрын

I know.

Fun thing to do: compare the shape of the footprints and tracks from this video (LRO) to the shape of the footprints and tracks that can be seen from the Apollo 17 liftoff video, and they are exactly the same.

@DrTWG

7 ай бұрын

There's an idea for a video . Harrison Schmitt , one of the landing crew is still around . He was the only bona-fide scientist to get an Apollo seat . The pilot types hated the idea that the job could be done by anyone other than one of 'the brethren & possessor of the right stuff ' . It's interesting to note that there was virtually no hand-flying on an Apollo mission . The small amount that was done was heavily augmented by the digital autopilot (AGC) and was quite different from controlling a craft under aerodynamic forces - the Lunar Module was the only flying vehicle built without aerodynamic forces in mind , to work in a vacuum (the moon has an extremely tenuous atmosphere only) . Schmitt did a magnificent job - even his commander , Cernan couldn't find fault - and believe me - if fault was there - ol' Geno would have found it.

@mc-fj3fi

7 ай бұрын

U can see the CGI layer if u watch slow enough. Fake

@DrTWG

7 ай бұрын

@@mc-fj3fi LOL!

@MrMome1612

7 ай бұрын

​@@mc-fj3fiYou see it, cause you wanna see it. Your brain is fake!

@maladetts

6 ай бұрын

@@DrTWG Digital autopilot? Moon atmosphere? Cool story, bro.

you must be joking.

@JackFrost008

3 ай бұрын

No.

@RejectOneWorldGov

Ай бұрын

😂 😮😳

@CANDIKONETT

7 күн бұрын

Crazy how many people believe we didn't land on the moon.

@Spongey_bob

Күн бұрын

​@@CANDIKONETTfr

This could be photo shopped easily

@msidc1238

3 ай бұрын

It can also be photographed easily. With the LRO.

I only wish we could have got much closer, as close as to an individual footprint in the regolith itself. Here's to days to come I hope. "As we leave the Moon at Taurus Littrow, we leave as we came and God willing we shall return. With peace and hope for all mankind. Godspeed the crew of Apollo 17." - Gene Cernan, the 11th and last man on the Moon to date.

Wow! But what nostalgia for your wonderful videos! I was thinking but what must have happened because he stopped?! I love your work! I wish you a very nice weekend and I wish you success in everything you undertake! Thanks for your new video!

@Astromagazine

2 жыл бұрын

Oh thank you so much my friend

@deanhall6045

7 ай бұрын

He stopped because there is nothing there. Those tracks aren't even from Apollo. Click baiting.

Ohne eine störende Atmosphäre kann die phantastische Optik ihre ganze Stärke ausspielen! Großartige Aufnahmen!

@SenkaBandit

4 ай бұрын

Völlig Losgelöst Von der Erde Schwimmt das Raumschiff Völlig Schwerelos!!

Thanks a lot for this 😉👍❤️🇨🇵

Great editing

What a great video. Thanks a million!!

1:03 it's hard to make anything out before you superimposed the site on their

@never_give_up90

7 ай бұрын

It's because you have to change the lenses. I have to do that when using a telescope and they cut those parts out.

@son_of_jambo2835

2 ай бұрын

Super imposed

@son_of_jambo2835

2 ай бұрын

It just magically appears 😂

So amazing to have it all put into perspective. ❤ Thank you!

@RonaldMcDonaldface

7 ай бұрын

It's fake.

@mc-fj3fi

7 ай бұрын

Fake

Why are there no astronaut footprints from the moon buggy final parking spot to the challenger descent stage?

@ann_onn

6 ай бұрын

There are, but footprints are difficult to see, unless it's where they walked back and forth many times.

@maladetts

6 ай бұрын

@@ann_onn There are not. The only walks you can take are right here on earth, clueless.

@proto-geek248

4 ай бұрын

There are.

@maladetts

4 ай бұрын

@@proto-geek248 In your dreams, solely.

@ann_onn

4 ай бұрын

@@maladetts So, you think they faked SOME of the footprints, but not others? Jesus, you're deluded. Get help. Conspiracy theorists claim NASA was smart enough to fake it, but so dumb they didn't add stars. They think the Van Allen belts were deadly, but they only know they exist _because_ of NASA discovering them. Come on, dude, get a grip.

Woooow Your work is sooo gooddddd😍

How did you get closer than 0.5m per pixel?

@harishjavvadi9344

11 ай бұрын

A.I image processing developed very well. 😂

@bigdog4574

11 ай бұрын

This is from the lunar reconnaissance satellite that orbits the moon…

@Fe.2024

11 ай бұрын

@@bigdog4574information taken from the ass?

the moon is 2k miles wide roughly, crazy perspective this is. Moon is a lot bigger than people realize, 2k miles is a lot more than people realize.

For a moment I thought "I might be able to see this with the 12" dobs I ordered yesterday" LMFAO not a chance

@never_give_up90

7 ай бұрын

😅 yeah, not a chance. You can zoom in but you'll see a lot of blurr

FYI… the high resolution of the landing site and the tracks were taken by the lunar reconnaissance orbiter…

@seek.l2215

6 ай бұрын

It kinda has to be. Difference of zooming in from 250,000 km to only 50km

@maladetts

6 ай бұрын

The one that exists only in your imagination, while every image you're seeing here was created via computer right here on earth that no one knows how to leave yet?

@seek.l2215

6 ай бұрын

@@maladetts images aren’t “created” via computer they are sharpened. If u knew anything about astrophotography you’d realize this makes literally zero sense

@steveschunk5702

6 ай бұрын

If only Hubble had a 5 kilometer focal length..

@maladetts

6 ай бұрын

@@seek.l2215 Obviously, I know about everything related to the subject more than you ever will. Computer imagery is exactly created with the computer, what else? What you wrote makes zero sense, and so does any clownry that still insists on the infamous moon hoax as real event.

It is a pity Gene Cernan isn't around to see this.. amazing! 👍🚀

Need video in 4k 8k...

My godness....what a beautiful image that was!

You need a telescope the size of earth to see that close 😅.

@bigdog4574

11 ай бұрын

First of all that’s not true… you need a telescope 100m wide… but also can be done with a satellite… in this case this image was taken with a lunar reconnaissance orbiter satellite!

@sinformant

8 ай бұрын

You can buy consumer grade telescopes that you can see Saturn and its rings. Granted not up close, but you can see the colors, shape and the rings. So you would think you'd be able to zoom far enough into the moon which is infinitely closer and be able to see things like tracks from the moon buggy, moon buggy itself, or any one of the 6 moon lander module bases just sitting there.

@never_give_up90

7 ай бұрын

​@@sinformantthat's kinda hard because when you zoom in it gets blurry. I'd say a good telescope matters. I can zoom in to Saturn but have to work hard to get sharp moon zooms and this close is very blurry but yes, it's there.

@montylc2001

7 ай бұрын

Study up on telescope optics before you make a comment that reveals you to be totally ignorant on the subject.@@sinformant

@Thisisjs96

7 ай бұрын

Yet somehow we are able to see millions of light years into the past with the ones we have?

pump up the volume pump up the volume ,dance dance....

If NASA wanted to debunk conspiracy theories that they never landed on the moon, why haven't they just pointed one of their space telescopes at the moon and taken photos up close of the landing sites? 🤔

@JohnHazenhousen

8 ай бұрын

They _have_ taken photos of the Apollo landing sites with the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. That’s where the photos in this video are from. Conspiracy theorists simply dismiss them all as fake.

@bobmusil1458

7 ай бұрын

That's exactly what they did, you dork!

@jackking5567

7 ай бұрын

@@JohnHazenhousen That isn't what they asked.

@JohnHazenhousen

7 ай бұрын

@@jackking5567 They asked about close-up photos of the Moon landing sites - _like the ones taken by the LRO and shown in this video._

@InvictusMatrix

5 ай бұрын

They have, but conspiracy theorists will deny everything to push their agendas.

Basicly they made from something pure acfreakn mess in just 1 day. Question. Why is there not one docu shot by a rover , and share the very very mesmerizing place. It would be the best profiting blockbuster ever. They go to mars but the moon is not possible. Realy?

@JohnHazenhousen

2 жыл бұрын

Are you okay?

Time to go back.

@uttaradit2

6 ай бұрын

2 the studio

@user-co8uy5rb2s

6 ай бұрын

Nah they went and you're triggered. 😂

@ltzLastGuestAnimatez_Studios

3 ай бұрын

Nah Flat Earther are the true idiots here.

The indistinct flag looms dimly...just zoom your android system of smartphone !

this is a just an animation images right?

@nortavon

10 ай бұрын

images taken by the lunar reconnaissance orbiter

@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline

7 ай бұрын

​@@nortavonphotoshopped...

I would like to see India's take on NASA landing sites...

@JohnHazenhousen

5 ай бұрын

Look it up, then.

@Spiderryder-

2 ай бұрын

Humans never landed on the moon. China, India, Russia and everyone else is aware of this.

Right...

Genial. Muy bién logrado, y es clarísimo. 👍👍🇨🇱

That's like a zooming in the water using microscope

Thanks a lot for sharing such amazing things ✨

Guys its easy to clear now if This Mission is ever Been done or not. Indias Chandrayaa 3 is on the Moon and can Maybe visit This places for uns Right? So we can See the fully truth for This Mission 😉

@ApolloKid1961

7 күн бұрын

Chandrayaan-3 did not capture images of the Apollo landing sites. However, previous missions like Chandrayaan-2 did capture images of the Apollo 11 landing site, specifically the Lunar Module Eagle descent stage at Tranquility Base.

Thats So Amazing ❤️

we need more people on the moon

@NZVideoGuy

Жыл бұрын

You? 😎

@never_give_up90

7 ай бұрын

No, we don't. We left a ton of trash on a quick trip to the moon. Its good enough, no need to waste the money and risk lives. Let's focus on a bigger picture.

@ynk-4372

5 ай бұрын

@@never_give_up90celestial travel is the bigger picture, earth wont last forever thanks to capitalism

Wow , how large your objective ? And how far the eyepiece? Very amazing!

@meloney

9 ай бұрын

The higher zoomed in parts are stitched together photos of low lunar orbit :)

Still no satellite orbiting with a live feed of the moon. Or one from its surface. How is that even possible?

@Zubareffstream111

Жыл бұрын

Why would there be?

@truepatriot6969

Жыл бұрын

@@Zubareffstream111 Yeah, totally dude. Why would there be? Like... who would even be interested in seeing something like that? Not me! Boring! Okay, I'm going back to drinking my kool-aid.

@Zubareffstream111

Жыл бұрын

@True Patriot There are a number of satellites that orbit the moon, and they are continually mapping its surface. It would be a complete waste of money to have one of those cameras pointing at our planet. Also, a 24/7 live feed would be impossible because you wouldn't see earth when the satellite was on the other side of the moon. I'm sure you think Himawari-8 is fake, so why would you believe a live feed from the moon? It's more than 10 times the distance.

@PotatoSalad614

Жыл бұрын

@@truepatriot6969 what scientific value does that offer

@PotatoSalad614

Жыл бұрын

@@truepatriot6969 answer me please

Good video

great times of great people...

Let’s take a moment to know this man got a telescope massive enough to see the entire mission on the moon.

@xenicmark

Жыл бұрын

Pretty sure these were taken by the lunar reconnaissance orbiter.

@iplayloud2

8 ай бұрын

​@@xenicmarkLRO back in 2011 exactly. Orbiting about 30 miles above surface.

@user-co8uy5rb2s

7 ай бұрын

Lunar Orbiter images you dim bulb😅

@martinwolfright3183

7 ай бұрын

@@user-co8uy5rb2s😂😅👍

@DrTWG

7 ай бұрын

Take a moment to know that you would need a powerful microscope to find your brain.

Which telescope did you use to capture this??

@Fe.2024

11 ай бұрын

a telescope with a great a.i

@trident8872

11 ай бұрын

@@Fe.2024 which brand??

@nortavon

10 ай бұрын

lunar reconnaissance orbiter

@emreevo8

7 ай бұрын

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

@bobwellman9717

7 ай бұрын

No wonder I can't zoom in that close. Mine is an s21😟 @@emreevo8​

Nice graphs

Amazing CGI👏

@BuildonRock

Жыл бұрын

That's what I was thinking.

@odbo_One

11 ай бұрын

They must spend a lot of money into you, you are amazing for AI android👏.

@wtg93511

9 ай бұрын

amazing brain wash by prosecute envy 👏

@svyatoyaleksnevskiy

9 ай бұрын

Do you have any evidence that NASA scientists and engineers just sit in their offices all day generating fake space pictures, or did you just pull that out of your arse?

Great 👍👍👍👍

No way! That’s great! We landed on the moon!

@TanDJServices

Жыл бұрын

Dumb and Dumber reference

@ajdemipushi567

11 ай бұрын

Have you been there to know ?

@QUIROPTEROHOLLOW

8 ай бұрын

​@@ajdemipushi567Yes I have

@Iveyenahs

7 ай бұрын

Same people who say we went to the moon(but since have lost that technology and just can't do it again), pulled an image out of their ass and said 'here is the footprint taken by orbiter'.Untill we can zoom in like that on our own, then they'll say that it is no longer there because of something the moon goes through every blah blah 100000 years which erases footprints. And you all will clapp in awe again, at utter bs.

@ynk-4372

5 ай бұрын

@@Iveyenahsnobody lost the technology and u grossly misunderstand what was meant when Don Petit said what he did. The saturn v rocket and most associated hardware are still on display at the Kennedy space, center, however they are now defunct ie not a sustainable way of planetary travel as we have evolved and gotten more efficient since the 60s/70s… Ever heard of Concorde? Exactly the same situation, the tech still exists but is defunct because of the economics of their continued operation.

Not very convincing!

@littlesofty01

2 жыл бұрын

Quit doing crack

@ziya396

Жыл бұрын

Me too

@6-dpegasus425

Жыл бұрын

​@Smee Self they really are something else hahahha

@N0RZC

Жыл бұрын

lol

@deemoney1178

Жыл бұрын

JESUS CHRIST is Returning Soon. The Rapture is near. Outer Space is a hoax. The Earth is flat and Stationary with a dome called the Firmament. There are Fallen Angels Imprisoned underground by God. AZAZEL AKA LUCIFER was Imprisoned underground alone in the desert. He is at AREA 51. The Vatican Freemasons came to America to find him years ago. He is where all the Technology, Systems and LIES come from. Info is on my page. God bless.

PURE BS...

@007SS40

Жыл бұрын

​@smeeself Do yourself a favor, investigate the fella who created "2001 A SPACE ODDESSY", his name STANLEY KUBRICK. Investigate him, Wehner Braun(German defector that wound up running NASA after WWII), & your APOLLO MOON MISSIONS. Also investigate Neil Armstrong's so-called famous footprint left on the moon with the sole of Mr. Armstrong's ACTUAL BOOTS that he supposedly wore on his glorious mission. What you find WILL shock you... ...you can thank me for the 'wake up' later... GOD BLESS...❤

@Zubareffstream111

Жыл бұрын

​@speedslave408 Kubrik remained at his home in the UK from 1965 onwards, never returning to the States. The footprint is a hoax, the photo claiming to be from Buzz Aldrins boot is actually from one of the later Apollo missions, 17 I think 🤔

Let me check the tittle. FOOT PRINT. must mean something different on the moon.

@olasek7972

Жыл бұрын

the same comrade

Good graphics

Come on, people.

@ynk-4372

5 ай бұрын

Whats there to come on about, stop being a science denier it happened and Science > You (a nobody). Guaranteed you cant provide a single paragraph to support your beliefs

Not possible!

@msidc1238

3 ай бұрын

With the LRO which is in Lunar orbit it is.

@ronaldmartino2610

3 ай бұрын

@@msidc1238 No, it's not! Check your facts.

@msidc1238

3 ай бұрын

@@ronaldmartino2610 Maybe your the one who should "check your facts".

@ronaldmartino2610

3 ай бұрын

@@msidc1238 Tell me where I can find a legitimate photo along with source information. Just because they say it, doesn't mean they've done it. I don't comment lightly. EDIT: Need a larger telescope or lower orbit. FACT.

@msidc1238

3 ай бұрын

@@ronaldmartino2610 Why don't you look for yourself? KZread doesn't like links anyway. But I'd like to see how you determined that the LRO would need to be lower or need a more powerful telescope.

Yes Finally :)

Can somebody explain if they are footprints why they are long continuous lines and not spaced due to the gravity or lack there of and the bigger leaps? With this they would have to drag a limb there and back but on pictures taken there are hardly any marks?

@bigdog4574

11 ай бұрын

Those are lunar rover tracks individual foot prints hard to make out

Not at all convinced lmao cgi all the way

@montylc2001

7 ай бұрын

Yes, cgi made these images 15 years ago when the technology was still crap,.

@ynk-4372

5 ай бұрын

And what are your credentials in graphics production that we should believe your claims? Gonna presume you have none 😂

@Spongey_bob

Күн бұрын

I bet you think the earth is flat too

What will it take to see this on earth in my backyard?

@bobmusil1458

7 ай бұрын

The largest telescope in the world.

@SciRado

7 ай бұрын

That's easy start by going outside in your backyard. Sit down and watch this video again.

@MrMarkusj

7 ай бұрын

made my day !!! @@SciRado

@SciRado

7 ай бұрын

@@MrMarkusj 😁👍

@fromnorway643

6 ай бұрын

Does your backyard have enough space for a telescope with a 500 metres wide aperture? (larger than the Arecibo radio telescope that collapsed a few years ago)

If we can't capture the flag, how can we capture footprints

@JohnHazenhousen

7 ай бұрын

Huh? The flag is visible in this image as well.

forgot rover

why did astronaut not put a huge American flag lying on the surface of moon, so from the earth we could detect the flag easily?

@jmcd9255

Жыл бұрын

The Russians have used their best equipment and guess what? they cannot find any evidence of the US being there.. and why have they not went back? its all cheek and nonsense..

@PotatoSalad614

Жыл бұрын

Because think about how much extra weight that would add.

coordinats?

Just aint possible to zoom in at such accuracy..the size of the telescope needed to do that would be immense.

@ann_onn

6 ай бұрын

Yes, but this isn't all from Earth. The close-ups came from the lunar reconnaissance orbiter.

dont chase your own shadow

CGI till I can hold the camera and see it myself.

@ynk-4372

5 ай бұрын

Science denier that uses a smartphone 😂😂😂 make it make sense

Google Map est plus net et précis 🤔

Yeah, ok. Cool story bro 😂

@hypanusamericanus9058

Ай бұрын

What fantasy are you living in?

top mesmo

Here comes the flatters!!!

We arent fool.who belives this dramatic in newada desert

@ApolloKid1961

7 күн бұрын

It is not a belief but a fact that people have landed on the moon SIX times.

Nice edit dont be deceived.

not a live piture it zooms all wrong its like google maps

Even nasas telescopes can't see the landing spot

@daleeasterwood2683

29 күн бұрын

But the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter can.

Nice work Hollywood, now we have AI, thanks.

Hoabout they take pictuurs of athee touwers theym have theer ?

Apakah anda sudah minum obat??

What camera lens is this?

@Alien-tu9ib

Жыл бұрын

IPhone 7 plus

@kylet7294

Жыл бұрын

It’s not a camera, it’s an edit

@deathwithcrowbarintheear

Жыл бұрын

190 mm dual system of Newtonian telescopes on board the LRO probe with a scanning matrix of 5000 elements.

@Fe.2024

11 ай бұрын

a.i reconstruction

Cue the Flatearthers….

Nope 😂

Moon Landing Conspirators are SOOOO dumb.

this gotta bet fake right? they say we would have to have a telescope the size of esrth to see the flag

@JohnHazenhousen

11 ай бұрын

Did you not make it past the first fifth of a second of the video?

@nortavon

10 ай бұрын

images were taken from the lunar reconnaissance orbiter

@sebastiannolte1201

7 ай бұрын

The were taken from a atellite that orbits around the moon - only 50 km away from moon's surface.

Taken by a samsung galaxy phone lol

I see no footprints or the flag! We apparently can see billions of light years away, yet, seeing the stripes and stars on the flag is impossible! 😂

@montylc2001

7 ай бұрын

Do some research on telescope optics.

@RonaldMcDonaldface

7 ай бұрын

@@montylc2001 I did and it's impossible to see the flag on the moon.

@montylc2001

7 ай бұрын

Correct. The images were taken by the LRO orbiter from low orbit. The flag is about a pixel or two big. Similar images from the other landing sites actually show the shadow of some of them.@@RonaldMcDonaldface

@RonaldMcDonaldface

7 ай бұрын

@@montylc2001 no photographic proof of a flag on the moon. We do not have the technology to zoom in on a rock on the moon.

@montylc2001

7 ай бұрын

Yes, there is photographic evidence courtesy of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Photos taken from close lunar orbit. From each of the landing sites. The final zoom in this video is from that. You cannot make out any detail but you can tell that they are there. Just google "LRO images of the apollo landing sites" Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 are imaged pretty well.@@RonaldMcDonaldface

I can’t believe y’all think this is real😂😂😂

@sextinaaquafina

Жыл бұрын

@Smee Self Not with all this hair😂😂😂

@sextinaaquafina

Жыл бұрын

@Smee Self Doesn’t change the fact that all NASA footage looks hella CGI. 😂😂

@sextinaaquafina

Жыл бұрын

@Smee Self NASA didn’t release “images from space” until CGI tech was invented. Everything before that was filmed in the high desert at night.

@gregh7457

Жыл бұрын

@@sextinaaquafina doesn't change the fact that you're hella stoopid 😂😂

@jacktyger5436

Жыл бұрын

It's real

Man that's hilarious. I thought you made phone calls there? And you've been 6 times can't you go 1 more time and put an iPhone on stream lmao. SPACE IS A FAKE HOLLYWOOD STORY

@robertcampbell6349

Жыл бұрын

You ate lead paint chips as a child.

@jacktyger5436

Жыл бұрын

I'm not surpriced that you say that anyways Deniers are pathological liars

I told you..AI is great.

@GameStop-li5hp

6 ай бұрын

But Apollo is 100% real why not? Its so cool that we can go to the moon why not?

@ryanpeace3042

6 ай бұрын

You can't even get this quality on Google earth of photos on earth 🙄 😂

WOW. I BELIEVE. RRIIIIIIIIIIGHT. NO. This is NOT a staged comment like all the rest.

Those are clearly and undoubtedly rover tracks Falsely claiming to be foot prints Even a kid can differe between the 2

LOL OK

Nice cgi

@petersearls4443

2 ай бұрын

Yes the zooming in was a process not the actual orbiter. But the final results are real as verified by other countries.

These days care needs to be taken to avoid even a hint if cgi or 'fancy presentation' - all that feeds the myth than the landings were faked. Some layperson technical explanation of what the orbiting camera is and then the photos in the highest resolution, is my suggestion.

This isn't real, neither are the moon landings, nice work though, the flat mooners will believe this though and sing the praise of how 1960s tech got to the moon, and they can't get wi fi to work perfectly yet LOL.

The footprints shows how small we humans really are.

Cool but fake

@acatinatux9601

4 ай бұрын

imagine it being 2024 and there are still people like you, choosing to be fuckin stupid and ignorant

Man that looks super fake look at that Challenger!!! Photoshop Big Time!!!!!🤥

@Bledipr

10 ай бұрын

It shows the exact spot/site in Moon where the Apollo 17 landed.

@mattmatt1426

7 ай бұрын

And you'd know what it should look like? You've been to the moon and seen it looks different first hand? Wow! Can you upload your pics please so we can see how yours are real and better?

@KS-gk8xd

7 ай бұрын

@IKSRTFO I agree. Totally fake. Try watching at half speed and you can witness the formation of the CGI layer while it's being applied to the image.

@mc-fj3fi

7 ай бұрын

Agree, fake.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ai? ai is somekind of FAKE XD

Hahahh CGI at its finest 🤣🤣

@msidc1238

3 ай бұрын

Prove it.

There was never a moon landing. 😉

@hypanusamericanus9058

Ай бұрын

Why do you believe so?

@peacfulearth

Ай бұрын

@@hypanusamericanus9058 they orbited the moon on Apollo missions 8 and 10 to photograph the lunar surface so it could be faithfully recreated.

@hypanusamericanus9058

Ай бұрын

@@peacfulearth Then don’t you think it was a little redundant for NASA to also send the unmanned Ranger impactors, Lunar Orbiters, and Surveyor landers to scout out the surface of the Moon in advance of Apollo?

@peacfulearth

Ай бұрын

@@hypanusamericanus9058 No. Everything had to look professional down to the last detail, otherwise the Russians or Chinese would have become suspicious. 😉

@hypanusamericanus9058

Ай бұрын

@@peacfulearth Well that still does not prove that the landings did not happen; it only suggests the possibility. Is there some other evidence you could share?