point to the right team - interference

point the the team on the right because the foot of the player of the left team is over the line.. I love your video's!!

fault because there is an interference with the player of the other team even if the foot is not completly over the line.

The point was given to team USA, but I say it is controversial. Although there are cases where the challenge system is wrong, the player’s foot was STILL touching the centre line. It counts as a fault when the whole foot crosses the line and not half of the foot.

@Timi116

5 жыл бұрын

or when the player causes interference, which in this case happened.

Is it foot fault if the Italian player's foot INTERFERED with the American player as can be seen in the video even if the foot didn't go all the way over the line? I thought if there's interference it is a center line fault.

@hamedsepehr

2 жыл бұрын

Being dangerous is irrelevant. Only criterion is that the whole foot should be on opponent side for a centerline violation. Here, it is not clear if the heel of the Italian player touches the line or not. If it touches the line, legal play; If not, illegal play.

@moujik2253

2 жыл бұрын

Check rule casebook (specifically 3.12) and you can make your own opinion

Need another 2 seconds of this video. Did the blockers on the right land on the foot of the player from the left or did they not make any actual contact? That might make it more definitive.

@hamedsepehr

2 жыл бұрын

It is totally irrelevant. Only criterion is that the whole foot should be on opponent side for a centerline violation. Here, it is not clear if the heel of the Italian player touches the line or not. If it touches the line, legal play; If not, illegal play.

Though decision. But i would not considered fault. At 0:22 you can see just a bit of the foot in contact with the center line.

@idless83

5 жыл бұрын

Sometimes the challenge system is wrong itself. But yes, only like 90% of the foot was over the line.

@sadhgurusfunniestandwittie3620

3 жыл бұрын

But it interfered with opponent's landing

@hamedsepehr

2 жыл бұрын

@@sadhgurusfunniestandwittie3620 it is totally irrelevant. Only criterion is that the whole foot should be on opponent side for a centerline violation. Here, it is not clear if the heel of the Italian player touches the line or not. If it touches the line, legal play; If not, illegal play.

@moujik2253

2 жыл бұрын

@@hamedsepehr casebook ruling 3.12. Rules state "provided that it does not interfere with opponent's play". Landing on or under the foot interferes with the blocker's ability to land and move back so actually yes it is relevant

@hamedsepehr

2 жыл бұрын

@@moujik2253 I know the rules because I am a referee. Landing on opponent's foot is not considered interference. If you watch international games, you see that happens many times (even leading to an ankle injury to the attacker himself) but it is not called. The reason is that there are lots of other factors should be considered to call it a fault. That makes refereeing an art.

dangerous situation - so point team right

@hamedsepehr

2 жыл бұрын

Being dangerous is irrelevant. Only criterion is that the whole foot should be on opponent side for a centerline violation. Here, it is not clear if the heel of the Italian player touches the line or not. If it touches the line, legal play; If not, illegal play.

It's afoul..bc he interfered with the opponents team inside their side of court