It annoys me when someone asks a question and then interrupts the person while theyre answering the question

@infowazz

6 ай бұрын

boo hoo

@michaelreed9805

5 ай бұрын

It's even more annoying when that person doesn't answer the question but eats up the time by turning a simple answer into a story. It's called philabustering! Bobert shut that shite down! next slide...someone needs some milk and cookies

@ayshad3962

4 ай бұрын

@@michaelreed9805 exactly! And its so painfully obvious but they continue to do it and it's a waste of oxygen

@ayshad3962

4 ай бұрын

@@infowazz do you need a tissue?

@ayshad3962

4 ай бұрын

@@rfair541 not sure what makes you think that but ok

Hard to respect someone who shows so little respect for others.

@richardburns-uz7of

10 ай бұрын

J_w Sally Katzen is a very sick woman and needs mental help

@infowazz

6 ай бұрын

not that hard

Why does Bimbert even have a witness there ? She clearly just wants to make a speech and has no interest in listening to the response of the witness.

Why is there so much corruption, I'm aghast, get them out,

@informedchoice2249

10 ай бұрын

It baffles me that you people believe Boebert. It's a sad indictment of your education system.

@jan_phd

10 ай бұрын

And yet there are 4.1 million Marxist Feminist teachers who voted to support Critical Race Theory... no one did anything about that.

@yoyeo1900

10 ай бұрын

​@@informedchoice2249 Critical thought. Give it a try.

@glennlewis835

10 ай бұрын

It's like they don't even recognize their own corruption.

@yoyeo1900

10 ай бұрын

@gypsy Your feelings don't matter.

Some people just love to hear themselves talk.

@alexdlocoa

10 ай бұрын

Ain't that the truth. Honestly, even if you have a good point to make, I think the goal should be to have a back-and-forth with the person you're trying to make look bad until you succeed in getting them to say something stupid, but if you're just there to give a speech you probably shouldn't be there in the first place.

The good people of Colorado must be so proud of "anti public urination crusader" Lareun Boebert. Now I understand why Boebert has so many "spousal abuse" issues with her husband. I don't condone ANY violence. But I understand how she could incite it.

Lmao, asks a question. Won’t let her speak

@patrickburden8257

10 ай бұрын

She was giving her the chance to confess. Parents do this routinely when they KNOW they're child is guilty but you have to have the conversation anyways. The truth is powerful - and quite clearly the witness was not interested in 'getting straight to it' as it were.

@johnhill1888

10 ай бұрын

She knows the right answer to the question. The witness wants to stonewall her and have her lose what little time is given for questioning.

@priscillaphillips3082

10 ай бұрын

Or she is skirting the question????

@roryfleming2320

10 ай бұрын

@@johnhill1888 so you are saying Lauren Boebert knows more about a law than a legal scholar. Boebert playing Reactionary politics at its finest

@roryfleming2320

10 ай бұрын

@@priscillaphillips3082 how can she skirt the question if she cannot answer it?

Nowhere in our Constitutional Republic does it delegate, to any form of government, the power to limit, restrict, regulate or ban anything from law abiding legal citizens, nor create a organization to enforce their unconstitutional laws.

@diegojines-us9pc

10 ай бұрын

what unconstitional law. you mean the patriot act bush passed that took away our civil liberties?

@chadsimmons6347

10 ай бұрын

The USA non-elected gov. employed parasites multiply themselves with no limit in sight. The EPA & Bureau Of Land Management depend on the people for tax revenue, yet consider most of them criminals deserving imprisonment!

@mick8888V

10 ай бұрын

Wasn't there a ban on alcohol at one time?

@tajdvl-advocate6113

10 ай бұрын

@@mick8888V That ban was allowed by the constitution. There was an amendment ratified it to make it so. Miss a civics class in high school?

@karowak1

10 ай бұрын

That lady should have grabbed her smart ass by the hair and made a couple laps around the well

Mr. Chairman we the people ask that non elected officials act with the long standing precedent of not making law.

@tajdvl-advocate6113

10 ай бұрын

Absolutely.

@JasRaymond1

10 ай бұрын

Raskin asking for respect is just mind blowing with all the lies and BS he puts out.

@crlheureux

10 ай бұрын

@@JasRaymond1 for real

@johnquillman785

10 ай бұрын

Take off the scarf ---- Raskin @@JasRaymond1

@ITGuru42

10 ай бұрын

Gun Control Act of 1968 empowers ATF to classify weapons, including determining whether a weapon is a handgun, a “rifle” or “short-barreled rifle." A conversion brace that converts a handgun into a rifle or a short-barrelled rifle is thus as illegal as a sawed-off shotgun, and Klan Shit Barbie Boebert the RepugnantKlan Party Treason Shit knows it. She's just lying her surgically enhanced Klanshit Barbie ass off.

Why is she so confrontational? She should "reach across the aisle" more often.

@jimmitchell1094

Ай бұрын

She was out of hand lotion.

Yeah but bob bart's not giving her any chance to answer anything she's actually being kind of rude

If “nails on a chalkboard” was a person 😫

In fairness, If a question is posed, the witness should be allowed to answer . Poor chairmanship.

@chasenuuhiwa

10 ай бұрын

"Excuse me, it's my time..." So why are you asking me questions without letting me answer... So odd.

@AntPDC

10 ай бұрын

@@chasenuuhiwa She doesn't want answers; she's making a motor-mouth political speech to satisfy her gun lobby sponsors.

@user-dm3qz1bi8r

10 ай бұрын

@@chasenuuhiwa I have never voted Democrat in my life but I have to agree. This witness was just there to be abused as far as Boebert was concerned. Kind of a BS move.

@patrec7638

10 ай бұрын

So after enduring years of "reclaiming my time" from Democrats, apparently Boebert needs to play by the rules suddenly? Considering how much waffle these witnesses manage, instead of providing direct answers, I wouldn't let a single one of them a chance to grandstand.

@Getsen42

10 ай бұрын

all wrong. each yes or no question was answered…the congresswoman just cut off all editorial comment attempts.

Mam the line of questioning wasn't to have you tell me why you can.. it was to tell you to stop it.

Y now THAT is how to SHUT THEM DOWN

Promulgating Regulations is totally separate and apart from legislating th law that governs it. Lawmakers ensure when you legislate that the law has boundaries stipulated in it that must be adhered to during the Regulation process. Regulators - Regulate consistent to the specific provisions of the governing statute legislated

"2nd Amendment Pride Month" I'm a public school board member. Do we get to have 2nd Amendment Pride Month where "Don't Tread on Me flags" are flown on campus, people in battle fatigues reading to school kids, pictures of various weapons on the wall, books supporting the 2nd Amendment in the library?

@lorra4789

10 ай бұрын

Better than sexual indoctrination ! So pedos can abuse them!

@ITGuru42

10 ай бұрын

Shut it Klanshit.

@Dan-sc7us

10 ай бұрын

Is that a joke?? You mean the crazy gun fanatics want a pride month??? Incredible!!

@kristinupchurch906

10 ай бұрын

Maybe we should!

@Camnorand

10 ай бұрын

Idk sounds pretty cool once a month kids and adults shown and taught proper gun safety as well as practice at a range for those old enough to show them how to use firearms would be awesome hell skilled shooting is an Olympic sport another sports program besides football ect ect

Lord help her Grandkids.

@sean9448

10 ай бұрын

Highly doubt she has any.

@YZ250W1

10 ай бұрын

@@sean9448 Her 18 year old son just got a 14 year old pregnant. Bobo is a grandma. She's giving us more idiots.

@tajdvl-advocate6113

10 ай бұрын

Though I doubt the witness ever reproduced any thoughtful or ethical intelligent life.

@robertrankin9130

10 ай бұрын

@@tajdvl-advocate6113 need to take a year to work thak out .

@nomeara2187

10 ай бұрын

Lol that's pretty funny but at the same time, it's a low blow. Be an udult even if others around you aren't......like these women. Lol

Forbes - I can't wait to see the hearing in entirety!

Why ask questions and not let the person answer? Just give a speech.

An insult may not be a substitute for a merit based argument however pointing out the hypocrisy is ny pointing out people who have pulling up the ladder behind them so no one else can climb up is.

@alexdlocoa

10 ай бұрын

The lady said that the person interrupted her, made it a personal thing, so the other girl decided okay I'm going to interrupt you every single time that you speak, and then also point out how expensive your home is. I don't think those two ladies like each other outside of the floor.

@richardburns-uz7of

10 ай бұрын

J_w Sally Katzen is a very sick woman and needs mental help

Those bureaucrats abuse their power violating the law with no consequences.

@diegojines-us9pc

10 ай бұрын

could you say they are weaponizing their jobs?

@walt

10 ай бұрын

Correction - they are abusing power that they don't actually have. Congress never delegated it to them in the first place. People need to learn to ignore the feds. They cannot actually enforce anything without cooperation from state and local authorities. See sanctuary cities for example.

@Dr.Cosmar

10 ай бұрын

Or, in her case, they just don't do their job, get caught, and say "eh, that was always the way it's supposed to be" with 0 regard for what is actually written into law.

@Possessedpappy

10 ай бұрын

Congress loves their bureaucrats. It's their job security and lack of accountability. Mrs.Boebert needs to point the finger back at herself.

@roryfleming2320

10 ай бұрын

You talking about Boebert?

It would be nice if she would be allowed to speak

She asks the question and gives her own answer.

"Are we talking about pistol braces, pistol braces, really, not AR's but we talking about pistol braces....pistol braces"? LOL

@marcsappington419

10 ай бұрын

What do you want to say about my AR?

@travisfoster1071

10 ай бұрын

​@@marcsappington419it's highly suspicious that you have one, and should be illegal.

@gc6888

10 ай бұрын

@@travisfoster1071 - So should giving puberty blockers transgender surgery on minors.

@countrypower3332

10 ай бұрын

@@travisfoster1071 why should they be illegal...... let me guess, your a felon and can't legally own one......I see.

@dutchdna

10 ай бұрын

That's all she could find to whine about.

Good to see raskin come around on impuning witness integrity. Complete 180 since questioning Matt Taibbi. Or maybe integity and decorum only matters to him when it's convenient.

@pickmeasinner

10 ай бұрын

It's not a maybe, hes a Democrat! Therefore, Shameless double standards abound.

@mikefrancis8223

10 ай бұрын

RASKIN : LEADER : “CONSPRACY OF DUNCES” !

@GatesRapes

10 ай бұрын

You misspelled Raskin - I'll fix it,, Ratskin

@Dan-sc7us

10 ай бұрын

What did say, "Can we stick to decorum"?? Wow, how rude!!!

Bureaucratic agencies do not have any Constitutional authority to make Laws/Rules that are enforceable by law. This is power given to Congress only.

@RecordedMercury

10 ай бұрын

Lmao fantasy

@alexdlocoa

10 ай бұрын

Yeah the agencies do pretty much whatever they want. Is it right? No, but they do it anyway. Who's going to tell them no?

@AntPDC

10 ай бұрын

The Parent Act (of Congress) almost certainly gave the Agency latitude to make regulations within the broad umbrella of the Act, otherwise Congress would have no time to make primary legislation at all. This is a feature of most systems of government worldwide.

@corrysmith

10 ай бұрын

@@AntPDC I said Constitutional authority not congressional authority. The power to legislate is that of the legislature only. You cannot legally make laws to subvert the constitution it is the supreme law of the land.

@AntPDC

10 ай бұрын

@@corrysmith Which part of the US Constitution is being offended in this instance? By their nature, constitutions don't deal with the details of law, which is why the US Congress (and legislatures elsewhere) were created.

I wanna see that GED!

Ah, that Boebert is an obviously trained lawyer and knowledgeable Rep. As such she is a great listener. Just joking..

Boebert isn't letting the witness respond in full. I hate when EITHER side does this! What it shows is cowardice. An interrogator unwilling to get into a clean exchange of ideas. Sad.

@sofakingrad3530

10 ай бұрын

When you watch enough of these you will realize that all of these corrupt people never answer a question directly. They know that there is only two minutes and they are trying to run out the clock. They always say stuff that doesn't matter and if pushed they will simply say "I will take that back to my staff and circle back with you".Or like with the FBI, CIA, and DOJ "I am not going to answer that because it is under investigation." That means that they are not investigating it and simply waiting for the clock to run out in four years. That is why congressmen always ask yes or no questions because if they answer directly, you know they are not corrupt and have nothing to hide. If they don't answer directly they are all hiding something like a $2.5 million home that the taxpayers paid for. But at least you said both sides so you are starting to wake up to how corrupt both sides are.

@dutchdna

10 ай бұрын

She doesn't want to give the witness the chance to prove her wrong. She learned that giving speeches brainwashes her crowd better.

@hihosh1

10 ай бұрын

Good I wouldn't either, sick of their excuses, just stop whatever you are doing and do as you are told is the best.

@kawikajones9436

10 ай бұрын

she is responding to the witness opening statement. There was no need for the witness to respond to many of her statements to her. The arrogance of these non elected bureaucrat officials in D.C. is disgusting!

@gregspohn1236

10 ай бұрын

Because she is parroting the same bs response. Boebert knows this. I know this because I heard her myself. Not to mention, her answers were unrelated to the questions and evasive. It doesn't take a criminal lawyer to see that.

Even if Congress wanted to they cannot delegate the powers of one branch to another. There are so many obvious dangers in this. And goes without saying unconstitutional

@idenn3droid2twoo-vy5fd

10 ай бұрын

Well said, they shoot themselves in the foot, then later complains that their foot hurts. In my opinion

@gregspohn1236

10 ай бұрын

Who said they were trying to do that?

@Soggy__302

10 ай бұрын

@@gregspohn1236 whut?

@karenkoontz4509

10 ай бұрын

??

@idenn3droid2twoo-vy5fd

10 ай бұрын

@@karenkoontz4509 what do you not understand?

Questions deserve answers otherwise it is not healthy dialogue but instead monologue, she displayed no class to push her agenda whether right or wrong , the witness shined and kept her composure.

@inezmerz3912

10 ай бұрын

I guess she got just what we the people get and that is we are not allowed to have a say in any of these unconstitutional rules, and changes to our constitutional rights of gun ownership, that government and special political interest groups are trying to take our rights for self protection away from us law abiding citizens and the criminals can run around attacking and killing us everyday Americans that don't have security guards to protect us against them. The summer of love if 2020 showed us who these people protect with their politics and it sure is not the law abiding citizens. Because the criminals are not going to abide by any laws put forth so again who are these gun grabber's attacking but the law abiding citizen.

@kayellis5575

9 ай бұрын

Boebert didn't study how commities work back in 6th grade when she completed her education.. if l was the woman she was grilling l'd give her nothing but gibberish.

She hit every branch on the ugly tree.

@stevecoyle1

10 ай бұрын

Why are you being so kind?

@sexoffendertrump

10 ай бұрын

Boebtch is the tree.

@BuddyNika

10 ай бұрын

@@sexoffendertrump to a moron liberal she would be

@chopper9170

10 ай бұрын

The last time she went to the beautician, she was in the shop for 3 weeks. It didn't turn out well.

@EricFoemmel

10 ай бұрын

Yeah, I agree. Boebert reminds me of a female version of McLovin in the movie Superbad.

When you ask a question expect answer. So be ready to listen. If you are not ready to listen then don't bother and waiste peoples time in the first place . Just continue your monologue blablabla 😮 Well done Jamie ❤ We need more like you. 👍 Courage

Where was the insult?

These agencies can only do what Congress delegates. Unless the agency beurocrats choose their own opinions. In that case, Congress approval is not necessary.

I think you have to let the person being questioned talk, otherwise what is the point of this hearing? The intent is not use this as televised speech but to get information and answers from people

Always expecting Boebert to leap onto the desk and in a screeching cackle say "How 'bout a little FIRE, Scarecrow??????"

Liberal witnesses don't like to be cut off but love it when people like Maxine Waters. Kind of funny.

@skybison_9

10 ай бұрын

They reap what they sow.

@ITGuru42

10 ай бұрын

Gun Control Act of 1968 empowers ATF to classify weapons, including determining whether a weapon is a handgun, a “rifle” or “short-barreled rifle." A conversion brace that converts a handgun into a rifle or a short-barrelled rifle is thus as illegal as a sawed-off shotgun, and Klan Shit Barbie Boebert the RepugnantKlan Party Treason Shit knows it. She's just lying her surgically enhanced Klanshit Barbie ass off.

@Nekulturny

10 ай бұрын

I know, those crazy libs actually thinking right wing congresspeople actually ask questions in good faith and actually want an answer rather than just an opportunity to monologue.

@markfrost2707

10 ай бұрын

at least we dont bring the world people like Boebert. Someone who STRUGGLED to pass a simple GED test. You can whataboutism all you want but the point is...Lauren Boebert is dumb, immature and a hate-filled person.

@UTBDubya

10 ай бұрын

No witnesses like to be cut off, regardless of their politics.

Yay Lauren!!!!

@YZ250W1

10 ай бұрын

She couldn't even make it to the debt ceiling vote on time.

Got to stop this corruption!

Respect is given only where respect is due.

Views and answers are 2 different things. Huge difference lady.

@gregspohn1236

10 ай бұрын

These aren't just views and answers. This is swarn testimony, and she is basically obstructive by omissions and outright lies. The ATF needs to be dismantled, and a new agency formed. End of story.

@JPGR51

10 ай бұрын

Boebert "blah blah blah blah "

@bambam1948

10 ай бұрын

@@gregspohn1236 The witness never had a chance to answer because of BoeBitch's big mouth. No wonder her huband got rid of her!

@Golladan

10 ай бұрын

@@gregspohn1236 Obstructive by omissions and outright lies? She wasn't even allowed to speak!

@fightlikabrave

6 ай бұрын

They already KNOWE what her BS answers will be. She is being told to STOP and not "answer". No one wants to hear a word from her, nor needs to.@@Golladan

First. Get 'em little lady!!

@funfact8660

10 ай бұрын

She's as bright as a broken lightbulb, and truthful as Pinocchio, stereotypical Socialist Proletariat, Democrat Party, bad cheerleader and dingbat

@YZ250W1

10 ай бұрын

I'm surprised she can read. At least she's not whining about public urination today.

@vernonbowling5136

10 ай бұрын

​@@YZ250W1 Lauren schooling the left is awesome and oh so easy .👍

@YZ250W1

10 ай бұрын

@@vernonbowling5136 Good thing I'm not a Democrat sparky. Even a high school drop out can be in Congress when you're a Republican!

@elephantoflight3362

10 ай бұрын

@@vernonbowling5136 Hahhahaaaa….. She has never schooled a soul, ever…. Ever… ever….ever…

Nope. Forget her and move on. Boebert is right

@stevecoyle1

10 ай бұрын

Can't just forget, got to get rid of her and her like.

After the crap she just pulled with Beetlejuice crap it's a joke she's so arigant

Im definitely not interested in the old lady's views!

That old crow would just lie through her teeth anyway

@ITGuru42

10 ай бұрын

Gun Control Act of 1968 empowers ATF to classify weapons, including determining whether a weapon is a handgun, a “rifle” or “short-barreled rifle." A conversion brace that converts a handgun into a rifle or a short-barrelled rifle is thus as illegal as a sawed-off shotgun, and Klan Shit Barbie Boebert the RepugnantKlan Party Treason Shit knows it. She's just lying her surgically enhanced Klanshit Barbie ass off.

@BobSmith-cg6yp

10 ай бұрын

Think she’s had a drink or two.

She just wants to grandstand. She doesn’t want a response.

@rona4851

10 ай бұрын

Duh.

@kellyzarek4073

10 ай бұрын

She was addressing points the witness made in her written statement.

@deezlight2649

10 ай бұрын

@@kellyzarek4073 no. She is just a rude embarrassment that is not seeking change but rather gotcha moments. This is the new face of the GOP…rude and radical.

@iggyschlepp

10 ай бұрын

She wouldn't understand the answers anyway unless they wrote them in crayon and had a picture book.

@gonzo1168

10 ай бұрын

Boebert wasn't interested in her blathering inane nonsense and wasting the time that she (Boebert) was allotted to be able to ask questions to a specific point and purpose. The witness had already made false statements about agencies not overstepping their authority and was continuing to try and defend these agencies and waste time despite Rep. Boebert trying to redirect the conversation back to the questions she had initially asked. That is how these agencies remain free to overstep their authority and strip citizens of their freedoms -- not being held accountable. The sooner people like you realize this, the more freedoms we as citizens will retain.

She treats all of the witnesses as if they are defendants. Not giving them enough time to answer the question without interrupting them. I am a gun advocate that believes law abiding citizens should be able to carry without being penalized by all the redeculous laws that are being implemented.

Just like us I'm 62 been ridin my fourwheeler all over Ouachita national forest for years and now they put a sign on public lands that we pay for not to be able to ride. In peace. Leave us alone

She is the definition of a battle ax 😂

@jessicawalton3497

10 ай бұрын

A very dull battle ax that ran away from battle. You didn't watch her scamper off before the witnesses could answer?

@EricFoemmel

10 ай бұрын

​​@@jessicawalton3497ery dull, indeed. And, a loose battle axe that I would be afraid to swing. The top of the "battle" axe would come flying off the handle.

@MungeParty

10 ай бұрын

Honestly she did poorly here, and I usually like her.

@len8336

10 ай бұрын

I agree that face looks like it's been through a couple battles

@centerpoint643

10 ай бұрын

How would we know her views? She was never allowed to complete a sentence.

It's very impractical to expect any swamp creature to answer questions, especially honestly.

@bgone4265

10 ай бұрын

Plus they drag out their answering to eat up the time allocated so they won't be questioned longer.

@dev0luti0n

10 ай бұрын

Boebert is the swamp creature here...

I'm really liking Jasmine Crockett.. Keep up the good work.

I wish Ted would speak his mind and stop being so subtle.

She ask a question and then she talks over her. This is how congress works,?!? We are in trouble.

@Witless_Prosecution

10 ай бұрын

Yes that is exactly how it works. The member gets very limited time and will interrupt and/or reclaim time if the witness proceeds to speak beyond a yes or no. Also, the committee chairman could have made ruling that the witness did not get to answer a question, but he didn't do that. There is also no rule that am actual question must be asked of the witness, the member can speak for the entire time.

@openallnight2113

10 ай бұрын

The Congress asks questions and it is either lied to or not answered. That's how it works. If you just look at the FBI bozos in the section 702 hearings that's the worst of it. It is actually refreshing to see the bureaucrat mafia bulldozed like that. Show them their place. "We are the ones who make the laws, and you are not".

@UltraGamma25

10 ай бұрын

@Iss Me . Filibustering is blabbering about nothing to waste a speakers time. Pay attention

@johnb2905

10 ай бұрын

I didn't hear a question really . She was stating facts and the nimwit wanted to counter with gobbly gook

@dev0luti0n

10 ай бұрын

@@johnb2905 Boebert was drunkenly stumbling over her own words. She was dazed and confused.

These bureaucrats indicate how they gaslight.

Go Raskin you rock!

WOW,

5:44 raskin crying “dEcORuM” is so scumbaggy it’s unbelievable.

Cancer boy should butt out and let members of Congress ask their questions...just my opinion though 🤷

@user-qs2md4cs3p

10 ай бұрын

At this point, the bandana is simply for recognition!

@lucindabutler7820

10 ай бұрын

What the hell. Now we make fun of those with cancer. Trumptards who respect no one especially the sick and disabled. Now victims of cancer are on your list. Wow no one is immune to cancer. Remember that some day. Maybe they will call you cancer girl. Outrageous

Bobart is 10000% right

They should have told the witness that this is only a stage for congress members to hold a speech, NOT to get answers to questions.

A bureaucrat with a 2.5-million-dollar home... nuf said.

@craigbatchelor6869

10 ай бұрын

No it isn’t.

@KnightTyme

10 ай бұрын

@@craigbatchelor6869 I think I get your drift... we DO need to know more.

I would love her to say that this rule isn’t a rule flat out!She is congress and she needs to!

@richardburns-uz7of

10 ай бұрын

J_w Sally Katzen is a very sick woman and needs mental help

And witnesses just answer the questions and Not give speeches to take up the time .

Agency officials are not "taking it upon themselves" to do anything. Ms. Boebert is seriously ignorant (actually, we could put a pin in my comment right there!) of how the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C Ch. 5) and the Congressional Review Act work. Officials can't "take it upon themselves" to make or change regulations or law. And Congress has pre-notice, and the ability to repeal, any regulation an agency passes. Congress's APA requires every Administrative agency to follow a laborious and ridiculously slow processes when developing and implementing regulations. Agencies have to notice all industry businesses and other potentially effected parties about the possible creation of a new rule; they have to publish the proposed rule; they have to accept submitted comments/ objections/ alternative language proposals; they have to hold open-to-the-public hearings where lobbyists and special interests try to shoot down the new rule or propose alternatives which are in the special interests' favor; they have to write a report which explains why or why not each and every public comment/objection/proposal was either rejected or incorporated into a final rule proposal; then give lobbyists and the public another comment period once the final rule is proposed. The Congressional Review Act empowers Congress to pass a joint resolution (an expedited legislative process), to review, OVERRULE, REPEAL and write specific legislation in lieu of the newly issued federal regulations. Agencies have to give both houses of Congress and the GAO a copy of the newly issued law, and wait a period of time before starting to enforce a new rule. During that time, GAO reviews the regulation, and reports to Congress whether the GAO thinks the regulation is reasonable, sound, workable, etc. If anybody in Congress wants to overrule the agency rule, they can use a joint resolution (an expedited legislative process) to repeal it. Once Congress repeals a rule, the CRA ALSO PROHIBITS THE AGENCY FROM reissuing a substantially similar version of the rule or issuing a new rule that is substantially the same "unless the reissued or new rule is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the date of the joint resolution disapproving the original rule" (5 U.S. Code § 801(b)(2)). So either Ms. Boebert is too damn lazy AND/OR TOO DAMN STUPID to read a GAO report and then sponsor a joint resolution. OR no one else in Congress had a problem with the regulations she's complaining about (or were too busy accepting Corporate bribes, oh let me rephrase -- donor class campaign contributions -- to seek to repeal the regulation). Because if ANYONE in Congress had lifted a finger to stop the regulations she's complaining about, they'd have never taken effect. Either that, or Forbes (or some other Corporation) has given Boebert more bribes -- er campaign contributions because the corporate special interest failed, despite spending a lot of money on lobbyists both during the rule making process and during congressional review, to get any Congressperson to repeal some rule before it took effect. Either way, Forbes shouldn't be lauding Boebert's ignorant, rude, and incompetent Congressional oversight. Their media money would be better spent buying another politician who can get the job done for them.

Exposure is so importance, thank you Rep. Boebert.

@ITGuru42

10 ай бұрын

Gun Control Act of 1968 empowers ATF to classify weapons, including determining whether a weapon is a handgun, a “rifle” or “short-barreled rifle." A conversion brace that converts a handgun into a rifle or a short-barrelled rifle is thus as illegal as a sawed-off shotgun, and Klan Shit Barbie Boebert the RepugnantKlan Party Treason Shit knows it. She's just lying her surgically enhanced Klanshit Barbie ass off.

Listen to Jamie he doesn't like it when Republicans are correct ! Rankings is no good !

@dev0luti0n

10 ай бұрын

Republicans are never correct though.

The guy with the bandana on his head talking about decorum. It's straight out of Idiocracy....

@goldengalsclazy

Ай бұрын

Rep. Jamie Raskin underwent chemo for cancer; hence, his bandana.

What the hell is on that guys head? No, I'm sorry. But I can't fucking take that guy seriously. On the other hand - I applaud and thank Ms. Boebert for passionately seeking accountability for all of the egregious atrocities that the American people have had forced on them for decades. Her example with the clean waters act was powerful.

@mjef3695

10 ай бұрын

Court jesters wear those.

@SilverSergeant

10 ай бұрын

@@jimihendrix1575 He still looks like a court jester.

@OGMCMLXXI

10 ай бұрын

@@jimihendrix1575 he is evil I can see why he has it🤡 it that ok with you?

@jimihendrix1575

10 ай бұрын

@@OGMCMLXXI He is evil. I agree with you 100%. That is definitely ok with me!

@mjef3695

10 ай бұрын

@@jimihendrix1575 Alright with me.

“How insulting of you to notice I’m a VERY RICH BEAURACRAT”-🤣😂🤣

Seers see the great fall of elites. Judgement by The Dead and The Chosen was called. The Most High has sent his wrath upon the earth. Judgement on the world is here👁👁

Im glad somebosy is noticing . In my case the officer changed pinch into punch . After 7 months in a concrete box i took the deal to get out ! How many felons have a similar experience?

2.5 million dollars at that pay akd position ?? Must be nice!! 😂

@richardburns-uz7of

10 ай бұрын

J_w Sally Katzen is a very sick woman and needs mental help

Mercy.... the Senator never let's the lady speak... we want people to answer questions but when individuals try to answer the questions given interrupting then doesn't solve the issue... the Senator from Colorado needs to cool her heels.... I yield back...

@orvilletowner2503

10 ай бұрын

How's it feel

@gonzo1168

10 ай бұрын

Boebert wasn't interested in her blathering inane nonsense and wasting the time that she (Boebert) was allotted to be able to ask questions to a specific point and purpose. The witness had already made false statements about agencies not overstepping their authority and was continuing to try and defend these agencies and waste time despite Rep. Boebert trying to redirect the conversation back to the questions she had initially asked. That is how these agencies remain free to overstep their authority and strip citizens of their freedoms -- not being held accountable. The sooner people like you realize this, the more freedoms we as citizens will retain.

@joec1360

10 ай бұрын

She's a congresswoman, not a Senator. Take a civics class Einstein.

@AntiMasonic93

10 ай бұрын

Boebert is not a senator. She is a U.S. Congresswoman from Colorado.

Decorum? How about some honest answers from a swarn witness instead of parroting the same bs answer over and over again. Holy crap! It's disgusting because they know that they are doing it and don't care.

5 min is not enough time.

Congress has indeed given these agencies the authority to create regulations that do pack a punch (statutory) if they're broken. And there lies the problem because the POTUS whose executive branch manages these 18 or so departments and agencies use them to basically create what amounts to laws without Congress. It it legal to do so but it is clearly an abuse of these powers. Something has to be done by Congress to get this corrected but it won't because both Dems and GOP want their presidents to have these powers.

@lennybob2602

10 ай бұрын

Thank you for this informative input

@mccjoe01

10 ай бұрын

Actually they have expanded the meaning of Chevron defrence by abusing it. This is not what Congress had in mind for it. Also this steps all over the rule of lenity. Which is what should be applied instead of this bastardization of defrence.

Prime example of a self aggrandizing bureaucrat.

She asks a witness a loaded question and interrupts her every single time she starts to answer - and then scolds her for trying to answer the question, and without taking a breath goes on to another - loaded - question. More and more various irrelevant topics and loaded questions that cannot be answered. This is a very deliberate tactic called the Gish Gallop.

The constant moving of goalposts is a loser tactic.. that only losers will need to do

The process is quite a waste of time if you call witnesses & talk over them for 5 minutes!!!!! It’s stupid

That bureaucrat deserved to have her filibustering interrupted.

I don't get it, why do these congressman & women only get 5 minutes. How about no time limits, let them finish. Too bad that those that who have to sit & listen, that's why we put you there.

Not sure how stating that the lady has a 2.5 million dollar home is an insult.

@richardburns-uz7of

10 ай бұрын

J_w Sally Katzen is a very sick woman and needs mental help

@averyjaydeen2929

4 ай бұрын

Agree, and not sure how it's relevant, either.

Hell no

Lauren is such a good representative, we need more politicians to stand up for we the people.

Perhaps Congress should be removing these people, who are taking it upon themselves, to change these rules, regulations, and laws, which they are unauthorized to do! Fire them! This way, you wouldn't have to worry about them, doing that again! Dah It looks like We the People, will have to make our way to DC, and show them, how it's done! This Government has gotten much too large, and it's gotten somewhat out of control! 🇺🇸

@CDWCAULDRON

10 ай бұрын

Hear Hear, second it Congress, should take back their power and remove every one in all agency's that do not follow the law or take it upon themselves, to change these rules!

@Dragonfly9887

10 ай бұрын

Our government has gotten way out of control to ridiculous. I don't even think half them understand how the government works. Elementary school children are more responsible, respectful, do their own homework, and can can read better than half of the people running our government.

@payattnto

10 ай бұрын

the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Congressional Review Act make it impossible for agencies to "take it upon themselves" to make or change regulations or laws. Moreover the APA and CRA empower Congress people like Boebert to repeal any changes in regulations or laws before they take effect. Clearly, Boebert was too stupid, lazy, or isolated in her objection to these rules, because NO ONE IN CONGRESS LIFTED A FINGER TO REPEAL THESE REGULATIONS SHE'S COMPLAINING ABOUT BEFORE THE REG TOOK EFFECT. (See my more extensive comments on how those 2 laws work. Google or wikipedia these laws so you don't mistake Boebert's ignorance for advocacy and effective representation).

@CDWCAULDRON

10 ай бұрын

@@payattnto Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Congressional Review Act make it impossible for agencies to "take it upon themselves" to make or change regulations or laws.

@CDWCAULDRON

10 ай бұрын

@@payattnto Lets make it More clear .. They changed the rules and collapsed section of I-95 in Philadelphia happened.. Or when they changed the rules and did not follow procedure to the law and 8 people were arrested for a having a gun modification, that congress said was ok to have ! or when they said that a grassland was a wet land Because their was a Calvert and fined farmers, their are lots of those in every states where they did that even after it was repealed By the courts and congress as over reach !!!

It’s like she’s talking to herself looking into a mirror.

Laws are changed all the time. Those changes aren't made by bureaucrats.

Lauren really ought to let her witnesses talk ....might help her argument some. Then again, bullies getting bullied always makes me smile

@travisfoster1071

10 ай бұрын

Or, it might EDUCATE Boebert, her knowledge is always woefully lacking.

@gonzo1168

10 ай бұрын

​​Boebert wasn't interested in her blathering inane nonsense and wasting the time that she (Boebert) was allotted to be able to ask questions to a specific point and purpose. The witness had already made false statements about agencies not overstepping their authority and was continuing to try and defend these agencies and waste time despite Rep. Boebert trying to redirect the conversation back to the questions she had initially asked. That is how these agencies remain free to overstep their authority and strip citizens of their freedoms -- not being held accountable. The sooner people like you realize this, the more freedoms we as citizens will retain.

@gonzo1168

10 ай бұрын

​@@travisfoster1071 Spoken like a real intellectual 🙄 That's sarcasm, by the way... I'm sure YOU wouldn't be able to recognize it without a label.

@dev0luti0n

10 ай бұрын

@@gonzo1168 I'm surprised your kids haven't put you in a dementia elderly care facility yet.

They should all be spoken to exactly like that or worse.

@scotta.5681

10 ай бұрын

Really? Behaving in a ignorant arrogant manner is what you think is ok? I truly hope one day you find yourself being treated in such a manner.

dam

Representative Lauren Boebert is representing the American people properly.

@valerieroberts8241

10 ай бұрын

She is my representative! Love her!

@visassess8607

10 ай бұрын

Hahahaha not even close

@cl7700

10 ай бұрын

Ha she's conned her district into thinking she's done something for them despite voting against nearly everything that would help them. CO-3 is in horrible hands. She's an idiot and makes those people look bad. Most are good people. 😊

@Bubba065

10 ай бұрын

She’s a disgusting, disgrace, just a loudmouth!

@ITGuru42

10 ай бұрын

Gun Control Act of 1968 empowers ATF to classify weapons, including determining whether a weapon is a handgun, a “rifle” or “short-barreled rifle." A conversion brace that converts a handgun into a rifle or a short-barrelled rifle is thus as illegal as a sawed-off shotgun, and Klan Shit Barbie Boebert the RepugnantKlan Party Treason Shit knows it. She's just lying her surgically enhanced Klanshit Barbie ass off.

I think I would just sit there and stare at her when she asked me a question and when she says are you going to answer just tell her when you shut up so I can!

FINALLY! I have tried to tell people! CONGRESS MAKES LAW! NOT AGENCIES!

Wow... This yapping chihuahua was totally disgraceful, making a mockery of what is supposed to be a hearing with a witness by acting like an immature bully who just keeps yelling over and interrupting people. This is what passes as an elected official these days?!?

Having watched the blatant disrespect from democrats toward not only witnesses, but republican members of congress, the blatant disrespect of the law by democrats for 7 long years, and the outright smug denial of anything that remotely looks like cooperation from these various agencies, I heartily approve dishing back what they dished out. It is also QUITE refreshing to see them stutter, gesticulate, and grumble while someone 'speechifies' at them instead of letting them drone on about anything and everything except answering the questions they are asked. Truth is not a lack of decorum ~ her house did cost millions ... but it is no more important than the Sackett's home. The truth is that EVERY one of the alphabet agencies was created solely by Congress as an end run around the constitution and the restrictions it places on the government. The truth is that those who question any of these agencies run away power grabs 'now' has only themselves to blame; if the House wants to slow them down they need to defund them. If necessary, defund everything, including their payroll budgets. Take away the very last penny and tell them that Congress is taking back control instead of farming it out, and that the government is going to work within those Constitutional restrictions for the benefit of the American people. It won't happen because the uni-party power hungry love spitting on our Constitution ~ and that uni-party is just about 97% of the 535 sitting right now. I can count on one hand the few who genuinely and consistently work not only for their constituents, but for all Americans ... and for America. Most of these arguments are nothing but lip service and a dog and pony show.

@jayteadesigns

10 ай бұрын

Are you condoning Lauren Boebert's behavior? Shocking! I have never, ever of anyone being so 1.stupid, 2. uneducated, 3. smart-mouth, and feeling so entitled as her except MTG!

What is the point of this woman being on any oversight committee if she doesn't allow the witness to answer the question.